Health-related Quality Of Life In Cancer Patients Research Articles

How Do Quality of Life (QoL) and Symptom Burden Evolve in Inpatient Palliative Care (PC) Patients following One Week of Care in a Specialized Palliative Care Unit (PCU)? A Comparison of Two Groups, with One Receiving Specialized Outpatient Palliative Care Prior to Admission.

This study sought to investigate changes in quality of life (QoL) and symptom burden among palliative care patients undergoing one week of inpatient care in a specialized palliative care unit (PCU). The patient population was stratified into two groups, with one group pretreated from pre-admission palliative care (PC) provided by an outpatient multidisciplinary PC team, while the other group did not receive such support prior to admission. Although the average duration of treatment at a PCU in Germany is 1-2 weeks, the question also arises as to whether a significant improvement in symptom burden and QoL can be expected after just one week of PC in a PCU. PC patients with various cancer entities were prospectively included in a non-randomized study. Patients in group 1 received outpatient specialized PC prior to admission, while patients in group 2 did not. Over an 8-month period, we gathered data from one academic cancer center, utilizing the EORTC QLQ-C30, one of the most widely used patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments to assess health-related QoL in cancer patients. Patients completed the QLQ-C30 at T0 (admission or one day later) and T1 (one week later), enabling the assessment of potential changes in their QoL and symptom burden over time. A total of 103 patients (51.5% male) were enrolled (group 1: 42%, group 2: 58%). At T0, there were no significant differences regarding QLQ-C30 scores between groups 1 and 2, except from global health/QoL (group 1 mean 20.7, group 2 mean 25.6, p = 0.026). Over the course of one week several significant and clinically relevant changes were found: Emotional functioning demonstrated an uplift in both groups (group 1: mean 41.5 IQR 33 vs. 53.1 IQR 50, p = 0.014, group 2: mean 48.2 IQR 46 vs. 56.8 IQR 58, p = 0.029), as did the global health status (group 1: M 20.7 IQR 17 vs. 36.2 IQR 33, p < 0.001, group 2: M 25.6 IQR 25 vs. 35.3 IQR 33, p < 0.001). Nausea and vomiting showed a reduction (group 1: M 29.9 IQR 17 vs. 6.8 IQR 0, p < 0.001, group 2: M 22.6 IQR 17 vs. 8.2 IQR 0, p < 0.001), along with a notable decline in pain (group 1: M 67.4 IQR 67 vs. 25.3 IQR 17, p < 0.001, group 2: M 73.1 IQR 83 vs. 29.7 IQR 17, p < 0.001). A decrease was observed in insomnia (group 1: M 63.6 IQR 67 vs. 27.6 IQR 33, p < 0.001, group 2: M 60.1 IQR 67 vs. 27.6 IQR 33, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups 1 and 2 in the extent of improvement in the various symptom scales from T0 to T1. The findings of our study demonstrate that QoL and several symptoms prevalent in cancer patients cared for in the PCU experienced significant enhancement over the span of just one week. Both groups, patients receiving specialized outpatient PC prior to admission and those without, equally benefited from inpatient PC. All mentioned changes from T0 to T1 are considered not only significant but clinically relevant.

Socioeconomic Status Plays a Moderating Role in the Association Between Multimorbidity and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Cancer Patients.

This study aimed to explore the moderating role of socioeconomic status (SES) in the association between multimorbidity and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among cancer patients in Anhui China. A total of 560 cancer patients were recruited for the cross-section study. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Tobit regression analysis was employed to investigate the relationship between multimorbidity and HRQOL as well as to assess the moderating effect of SES. The research findings indicated that 76.61% of cancer patients experienced multimorbidity, with psychological multimorbidity being the most prevalent (45.54%), followed by physical-psychological multimorbidity (20.89%). Moreover, physical-psychological multimorbidity had the most substantial adverse effect on HRQOL (P < .001). The presence of multimorbidity was correlated with a significant decline in HRQOL, with a 17.5% (P < .001) decrease in HRQOL for each additional multimorbidity. Additionally, SES played a significant role in moderating the impact of multimorbidity on HRQOL in cancer patients. (Marginal effect = -0.022, P < .01). The high SES group exhibited a higher overall HRQOL than the low SES group (Marginal effect = 0.068, P < .001). And with the increase of multimorbidity, HRQOL in the higher SES showed a more pronounced downward trend, compared with the lower SES (β = -.270 vs β = -.201, P < .001). Our findings underscore the importance of preventing and managing multimorbidity in cancer patients, particularly those with low SES. Furthermore, it is essential to consider the impact of the rapid decline in HRQOL as the number of multimorbidity increases in individuals with higher SES. It is imperative to explore interdisciplinary and continuous collaborative management models.

A systematic review of the use of the then-test for evaluating health-related quality of life in cancer patients.

The then-test, also known as the retrospective pre- and post-test design method, is a measurement used to evaluate response shift. The method requires patients to assess their previous healthrelated quality of life (HRQoL) and provide a retrospective judgement based on their current perspectives. The then-test, however, has been criticized for its reliability and validity. The objective of this systematic review is to summarize the current literature for the use of the then-test for evaluating HRQoL in cancer patients and account for potential response shift effects. A literature search was conducted in May 2022 using MEDLINE, PubMed, and PsychINFO dated from 2005 to the time of the search. Studies were included if they (I) used the then-test and (II) involved a population of cancer patients (any cancer site). The literature search resulted in 16 studies, published between 2005 and 2020. All studies used the then-test to detect response shifts. The EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 questionnaires were the most common assessments used to evaluate HRQoL. Of the 16 articles, 5 exclusively reported on breast cancer, 5 reported on prostate cancer, and the remaining included all cancer sites. Most studies looked at patients undergoing a combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormonal therapy. The mean differences between the retrospective assessment at both 3 and 6 months were significant for various quality of life (QoL) dimensions. Patients in some studies recalled their pretreatment HRQoL (then-score) as better than the pretreatment baseline scores and others reported them as worse, both confirming the existence of a response shift. Our review demonstrates that the then-test measurement tool has been commonly used for the detection of response shift. Newer measures for response shift have become more accepted; the thentest, if used, should be used with caution considering its limitations and the emergence of more advanced methods.

The effect of health literacy, self-efficacy, social support and fear of disease progression on the health-related quality of life of patients with cancer in China: a structural equation model

BackgroundHealth literacy (HL), self-efficacy (SE), social support (SS) and fear of disease progression (FOP) are all important factors affecting health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in cancer patients. However, their synergistic effects and underlying mechanisms on HRQoL in cancer patients remain unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to construct a structural equation model (SEM) to explore the underlying mechanism of factors affecting HRQoL. It is hoped that this study will provide a theoretical basis for future interventions.MethodsA cross-sectional design and convenience sampling method were used to investigate cancer inpatients in two general hospitals in Chongqing and Chengdu. Data were collected using structured scales, including HL, SE, SS, FOP and HRQoL. Finally, the SEM was constructed, and P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.ResultsThere were 1749 participants included in this study. Correlation analysis showed that all variables were significantly correlated with one another except for symptoms, physical health (PD) and social family (SF) (p < 0.01). The SEM of the HRQoL had a good overall fit (GFI = 0.943, AGFI = 0.917, NFI = 0.950, RFI = 0.936, CFI = 0.955, IFI = 0.955, RMSEA = 0.072). The model indicated that HL had the strongest correlation with HRQoL (β = 0.398, p < 0.01), followed by FOP (β = -0.364, p < 0.01), SE (β = 0.347, p < 0.01) and SS (β = 0.184, p < 0.01).ConclusionsThe HRQoL of cancer patients is correlated with HL, SS, SE and FOP. HL can directly affect HRQoL and mediate HRQoL through SS and SE. Future programs should consider HL promotion, SE improvement and SS expansion as the breakthrough point when designing targeted intervention strategies. At the same time, the importance of the impact of FOP on the HRQoL of patients with cancer should not be ignored.

Evaluation of a short instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in oncological patients in routine care (HELP-6): an observational study.

Patient-reported outcomes have not been sufficiently implemented into the routine care of cancer patients because the existing instruments are often too long and complex or not cancer-specific. The aim of this study is the determination of psychometric properties and item reduction of a newly developed health-related quality of life (HrQoL) questionnaire for use in oncological clinical routines. This observational study with a repeated measurements design included oncological inpatients and outpatients. A total of 630 patients participated at the first point of measurement and 404 at the second point of measurement. To evaluate the instrument, we conducted hierarchical confirmative factor analyses and for further validation correlated the resulting factors with standardized and validated HrQoL measurements. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change were tested. The developed questionnaire "HELP-6" ("Hamburg Inventory for Measuring Quality of Life in Oncological Patients") has a six-factor structure and has moderate-to-good convergent validity (r= -0.25 --0.68). Test-retest reliability was moderate-to-good (r =0.56-0.81, p < 0.001). Indications for responsiveness to change were found for three dimensions. The final version of the questionnaire HELP-6 has six dimensions with one item each. With the HELP-6 instrument for measuring HrQoL in cancer patients, we provide a short and practical patient-reported outcome instrument. Though responsiveness to change could not be confirmed for all dimensions in this study, the HELP-6 includes time-efficient completion and evaluation and is informative in relevant HrQoL dimensions of cancer patients. Therefore, the HELP-6 poses an important addition to inpatient and outpatient routine cancer care. This study was registered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/y7xce/), on 9 June 2018.

Quality of Life in Hematologic Malignancy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: A Systematic Review.

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) indicates patients' overall health and is an essential aspect of cancer care. Although multiple studies have addressed the various aspects of HRQoL in cancer patients, few studies have investigated HRQoL in hematologic malignancy patients in the Eastern Mediterranean region (EMR). This review conducted an electronic search using OVID-Medline to identify HRQoL-related articles involving hematologic malignancy patients in the EMR. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Two studies validated translated QoL psychometric instruments, three were observational studies, and three were interventional studies. Except for the validation studies, all studies discussed HRQoL in leukemia patients. Our review highlighted a scarcity in the number of studies focusing on patients with hematological malignancies in this region. The included studies demonstrated the negative impact of hematological malignancies and therapies on patients' HRQoL. In addition, the studies displayed the association between physical symptoms and QoL of cancer patients, necessitating the importance of addressing these symptoms.The studies were limited by publication year, the number of patients, geographical locations, and disease entities. Future studies in this area are encouraged to help understand factorsaffecting HRQoL in the EMR region and ways to improve it. Consequently, further research is needed to establish translated and validated QoL assessment instruments that target patients in the EMR using the most common tools including the Short-Form 36-item Health Survey and the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire.

A randomized study to measure and enhance the health-related quality of life in patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint modulators (ME-Q).

TPS6603 Background: Existing data demonstrate the impact of Immune checkpoint modulators (ICMs) on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL), but this was from studies that used HRQOL tools developed for patients treated with chemotherapy and/or radiation. To address this gap, we developed a toxicity subscale to cover important immune-related adverse events (irAEs) to combine this subscale with the generic FACT-G to measure HRQOL in patients treated with ICMs, the FACT-ICM. This trial proposes to validate the use of the FACT-ICM as a tool for HRQOL measurement and simultaneously to assess the benefit of remote symptom monitoring and management using a new electronic platform developed specifically for patients receiving ICMs. Methods: Participants will be randomized (1:1) before starting their standard of care ICM therapy to either usual care or the monitoring arm. The ME-Q platform uses a web-based application to enable remote monitoring of patient symptoms and HRQOL, allowing all participants enrolled in both the usual care or monitoring arms to complete the FACT-ICM and other questionnaires (DART, Health Resource Utilization, Decision regret scale, post-study system usability questionnaire) at set time points. Patients on the monitoring arm will have their electronic responses sent automatically, and new or significant worsening symptoms of clinical concern will generate an alert to the advanced practicing nurse (APN) responsible for replying to the patient and acting on responses. Via phone or a video teleconference, the nurse will perform a targeted assessment and provide standardized clinical advice and interventions based on well-established clinical algorithms and international guidelines for the management of irAEs. The APN will inform the patient's clinical team about the patient's responses and obtain the treating team's input and agreement on a proposed treatment plan. Patients enrolled in the usual care arm will respond to the questionnaires; however, their responses are not transmitted to their clinical team. The primary objective will be to validate the PRO tool for HRQOL measurement, and the secondary objective is to improve HRQOL in cancer patients receiving ICMs by remote monitoring and symptom management using the ME-Q electronic platform. We estimate that a total sample size of 266 patients (divided into two arms) achieves 90% power to detect an effect size of 0.4 in mean score changes (from baseline to 4 months) between arms using a two-sample t-test with a two-sided significance level of 0.05. Enrolment is to be completed in 2 years.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy plus Coping Management for Depression and Anxiety on Improving Sleep Quality and Health for Patients with Breast Cancer.

Cancer-related treatments may lead to side effects that undermine a patients’ quality of life (QOL). Although cognitive behavioral therapy plus coping management (CBTM) may appear to improve health-related QOL in cancer patients, limited documentation exists on the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for patients with breast cancer (BC) during recovery. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of CBTM for sleep quality, anxiety, depression, and health among patients with BC. An experimental study was conducted to assess the efficacy of a CBTM intervention (experimental group = 36, control group = 34). The experimental group received a 12-week CBTM intervention focused on their identity, challenges, the replacement of dysfunctional beliefs, coping skills, relaxation, and rehabilitation exercises, while the control group received usual care. The follow-up evaluations were performed immediately after the intervention (T1), and at one (T2) and three months (T3). The generalized estimating equation (GEE) model showed significant effects from the CBTM intervention over time. The experimental group showed significant improvement in sleep quality, anxiety and depressive symptoms, and significant increases in their mental and physical QOL from baseline, T1, T2, and T3—except for the mental and physical QOL showing no significant change at T3—while the control group receiving usual care showed no changes over time. The results suggest that CBTM increases sleep quality, reduces anxiety and depressive symptoms, and enhances health-related QOL for participants. CBTM is efficacious and can be provided by nurses to enhance patients’ coping skills and consequently improve their QOL.

Evaluating health related quality of life in outpatients receiving anti-cancer treatment: results from an observational, cross-sectional study

BackgroundThe aim of the study was to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in outpatients receiving anti-cancer treatment.MethodsObservational, cross-sectional, single-center study that assessed HRQOL in cancer patients receiving antineoplastic treatment.ResultsA total of 184 patients were included in the study; the median total FACT-G score was 66 ± 12.9; the scores for the physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being and functional well-being domains were 17.8 + 4.8, 19.1 ± 4.4, 14.8 ± 3.8 and 14.3 ± 4.7 respectively. Patients with adverse events had poorer HRQOL compared to those without them (FACT-G score 62.2 vs. 67.3; p < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis the variables associated with poorer HRQOL in the form of a gradient were tumor stage and performance status (ECOG); female sex was also associated with poorer HRQOL.ConclusionIn our study, the neoplastic disease and anti-cancer treatment toxicities had an impact on HRQOL. Patients had poorer scores in the functional well-being domain and higher ones in the social/family well-being domain. Variables associated with worse HRQOL were tumor stage, performance status (ECOG) and female sex.

PMU59 Predictors and Health Related Quality of Life Associated with Renal Diseases in Cancer Patients in United States

Cancer survivors are projected to increase from 16.9 million people in 2019 to 22.2 million people in 2030. Cancer patients are exposed to more nephrotoxic agents than general population and are hence at a higher risk of developing kidney complications and renal diseases. Renal diseases in cancer patients are associated with a negative prognostic factor for overall survival, worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL) more healthcare utilization. This study determines the predictors of renal diseases and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) associated with renal diseases in cancer patients. This was a retrospective cross-sectional study with data obtained from 2009 – 2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey for cancer patients above the age of 18. HRQoL is determined by Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) using Short Form 12 item (version 2). Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were done using t-test, chi square tests, multivariable linear and logistic model while controlling for covariates. All analyses were weighted to get national estimates with α=0.05 in SAS v9.4. Out of the 11,820 cancer patients, 1,969 were diagnosed with a renal disease. Significant predictors (p < 0.05) for renal disease were Female (OR = 1.73), Hispanic (OR = 1.84), Black (OR = 2.01), High School Education (OR = 1.43), Living in south (OR = 0.76), Low income (0.91). Adjusted mean PCS and MCS score for cancer patients without renal disease was 49.2 and 47.6 respectively. Mean PCS and MCS score for cancer patients with renal disease was 45.1 and 41.8 indicating worse HRQoL (p = 0.02) Race, sex, education, census region and income were found to be the significant predictors of renal disease in cancer patients. HRQoL in cancer patients with renal disease is worse as compared to patients with just cancer diagnosis.

Predictive role of socio-demographic and chronotype on health-related quality of life of cancer patients from southeastern India

ABSTRACT It is well known that cancer and its treatment produce marked impact on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of cancer patients. Research concerning impact of chronotype on HRQoL in cancer patients is almost not studied yet, but the interests are growing in several diseases. Present study was carried out to explore the impact of socio-demographics, chronotype and consumption of tobacco, alcohol and sleeping medicine on HRQoL of Indian oncology patients. Self-reported Quality-of-Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) were administered to the cancer patients (N = 1000) in the native Hindi language. Results revealed that among the socio-demographic factors, only age exhibited significant negative association with physical, role and cognitive functioning and positive association with symptoms, namely fatigue and pain. Interestingly, chronotype was found to be positively associated with emotional functioning and negatively with nausea-vomiting, dyspnoea, diarrhoea and depression. Patients who consumed tobacco, alcohol or sleeping medicine exhibited lower functioning and higher symptoms. Further, treatment of cancer also produced effect on a few measures of HRQoL of patients. In conclusion, age, chronotype and consumption of tobacco, alcohol or sleeping medicine were found to be important determinants of HRQoL of the patients.

Abstract 5756: Examining the relationship between medication utilization and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among breast cancer patients with comorbidities: A Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results and Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (SEER-MHOS) analysis

Abstract Background The population of 17 million cancer survivors in the US is projected to steadily increase by 29% in 2029. With advancing age, cancer incidence increases; therefore, the increase of cancer survivors aged 65 and older is expected to place undue burden on the healthcare system. Older cancer patients have higher prevalence of comorbid conditions, which contributes to a higher overall illness burden compared to younger cancer patients and may require complex medication management during cancer treatment. Cancer patients with multiple comorbid conditions report lower health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Women with breast cancer (BC) experience noticeable comorbidity prevalence rates (30%) that can negatively influence HRQOL and increase breast cancer mortality by 20-50%. The causes of HRQOL deficits are likely multifactorial, including demographic and clinical factors which require further investigation. Furthermore, research examining the relationship between medication management, comorbidities, and HRQOL in cancer patients, including stratifying the potential role of obesity that contributes to changes in HRQOL, is limited. Further research addressing the medication management of comorbid conditions can improve understanding of HRQOL in BC patients. Objectives To investigate the association of the medication management of hypertension, diabetes, and respiratory conditions on BC survivor's HRQOL. The secondary objective is to evaluate the role of obesity in medication management for these conditions and resultant changes in HRQOL. Methods Patients diagnosed with Stage I-IV BC between 2007-2016 were identified from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) and Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (MHOS; SEER-MHOS) data resource. Descriptive statistics and multivariate models, including demographics, clinical characteristics, and Medicare Part D claims, was used to evaluate medication management and potential underlying associations. HRQOL was assessed using the VR-12. Obesity was calculated from self-reported height and weight at the time of survey. Results The study population for this analysis includes 1,016 breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2007-2016 in the SEER-MHOS dataset with continuous Part D coverage one year before and after diagnosis. Among these patients, 85% reported at least one comorbid condition. Further analysis is in progress. Conclusions Understanding the potential aspects of treatment that influence HRQOL can provide further insights into patient-reported experiences and may improve standards of care to support older BC survivors with chronic comorbid conditions. Citation Format: Melissa A. Bruno, Roxanne Jensen, Catherine Wang, Dannielle Kelley, Erin Kent, Donna R. Rivera. Examining the relationship between medication utilization and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among breast cancer patients with comorbidities: A Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results and Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (SEER-MHOS) analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 5756.

Health-related quality of life in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review on reporting of methods in randomized controlled trials.

ObjectiveImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have recently shown tremendous promise in the treatment of diverse cancers. The available data suggests that ICIs are well tolerated in terms of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) compared to other anticancer therapies. However, it appears that instruments currently used to evaluate HRQOL in this context may fail to capture important symptomatology unique to ICIs. This systematic review was designed to assess the adequacy of methods used to report HRQOL in cancer patients treated with ICIs and to identify the quality of life scales used.MethodA systematic review was performed (systematic registration number: PROSPERO: CRD42019121427). A search of the PubMed, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences collection, and SocINDEX databases was carried out for publications in English and in French. Relevant databases were searched from the earliest records through to March 2019. Publications were selected if they reported on HRQOL in patients with cancer treated by ICIs. Risk of bias was scored using the Cochrane Collaboration bias assessment tool.ResultsOur search identified 144 publications between 2012 and 2019, of which 15 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The results suggest that even though the overall reporting of HRQOL was deemed to be of good quality, the data available was marred by methodological aspects such as the lack of HRQOL research hypotheses and the lack of questionnaires validated for cancer patients treated with immunotherapy.ConclusionThis study provides a comprehensive analysis of the current state of the art and identifies gaps in knowledge on HRQOL analysis with respect to ICIs. It also suggests avenues for further research.

The association between health-related quality of life and achievement of personalized symptom goal.

The aim of study was to explore the potential association between patient's self-reported physical symptom management goals as personalized symptom goal (PSGs) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer patients. The secondary outcome was to investigate the relationship between number of physical symptoms not achieving the PSGs and HRQOL in cancer patients. This single-center prospective observational study comprised 140 consecutive outpatients. We evaluated the PSGs and HRQOL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Patients were administered a self-report questionnaire, including reports on their physical symptom intensity and PSGs using Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r) scores. We investigated the correlation between PSGs achievement (ESAS-r score ≤ PSG score) and FACT-G total scores, and relationship between and number of physical symptoms not achieving the PSGs (ESAS-r score > PSG score) and FACT-G total scores. The patients who did not achieve PSGs of pain, tiredness, lack of appetite, and shortness of breath had a lower FACT-G total score (p < 0.05). Multivariate linear regression showed that higher number of physical symptoms not achieving the PSGs correlated with lower FACT-G scores (decreasing by 1.826 points for each such symptom, p< 0.01). Predictors of increased number of physical symptoms not achieving the PSGs were younger age and a higher symptom intensity of anxiety. PSGs achievement was associated with HRQOL in cancer patients. Additionally, the number of unachieved PSGs were independent determinant of poor HRQOL, particularly in younger cancer patients and those with higher symptom intensity of anxiety.

Risk of malnutrition and emotional distress as factors affecting health-related quality of life in patients with resected cancer.

This study analyzes the prevalence of malnutrition, depression, anxiety, and somatization and which factor has the biggest effect on quality of life (QoL) in individuals with resected cancer. A prospective study was conducted among 747 participants. Participants completed the EORTC-QLQ30, MST, and BSI-18 questionnaires. Prevalence for risk of malnutrition, depression, anxiety, and somatization were 36.4%, 35.5%, 35.2%, and 48.8%, respectively. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed that malnutrition risk, somatization, depression, and anxiety accounted for 50.8% of the variance in functional scale, 45.3% in symptom scale, and 52.2% in global health. Malnutrition, somatization, depression, and anxiety displayed high explanatory power on all health-related QoL (HRQoL) scales. The risk of malnutrition and psychological symptoms is strongly associated with HRQoL in cancer patients; thus, medical oncologists should develop effective interventions that contribute to lowering the risk of malnutrition and psychological distress, thereby improving subjects' HRQoL before initiating adjuvant chemotherapy.

Development of anxiety, depression and health-related quality of life in oncology patients without initial symptoms according to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale – a comparative study

Background: Depression and anxiety are associated with decreased health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The knowledge about the development of anxiety, depression and HRQoL in cancer patients without depression or anxiety, that is initially scoring as non-cases (cutoff <8) according to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), is sparse. The objectives were: (1) to evaluate changes in anxiety, depression and HRQoL over 6 months in two independent cohorts of oncology patients initially scoring as non-cases by the HADS, (2) to compare stable non-case patients with the general population regarding HRQoL and (3) to explore the outcomes using >4 rather than >7 as cutoff on any of HADS subscales.Methods: The study group (SG) included 245 and the validation group (VG), a previous cohort, included 281 non-cases. Patients who were non-cases (HADS <8) at all completed assessments were categorized as stable non-cases (stable-NC); those who were doubtful/clinical cases (HADS >7) in at least one follow-up were categorized as unstable-NC. Questionnaires were completed at baseline, and after 1, 3 and 6 months. Age- and sex-matched EORTC QLQ-C30 data from the general population were used for HRQoL comparisons.Results: One hundred ninety-six (80%) SG and 244 (87%) VG patients were stable-NC and 49 (20%) SG and 37 (13%) VG patients were unstable-NC. SG and VG were similar in all outcomes. Anxiety, depression and HRQoL deteriorated over 6 months for unstable-NC (p < .05). HRQoL for stable-NC was comparable to that in the general population. If >4 had been used as cutoff, most unstable-NC (36/49 and 25/37, respectively) would have been identified at baseline.Conclusions: Most non-cases are stable-NC with a high stable HRQoL, indicating no need for re-assessment. A minority develop anxiety or depression symptoms and impaired HRQoL; for these a cutoff >4 rather than >7 on HADS subscales may be useful for early detection.

Is there a relationship between objectively measured cognitive changes in patients with solid tumours undergoing chemotherapy treatment and their health‐related quality of life outcomes? A systematic review

This systematic review examines whether there is a relationship between objective measures of chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment in patients with solid cancer tumours and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Multiple online databases were searched (including Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, CINAHL, PubMed, and Web of Science) to identify articles published between 1980 and 2016 examining the extent of chemotherapy-related cognitive deficit and its relationship with HRQoL in cancer patients. Of 2769 potentially relevant articles, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria for the current review. Evidence for the presence of cognitive impairment in patients treated with chemotherapy was found in 15 of the 17 studies. Of the 15 studies finding some sort of cognitive impairment, 12 were in female breast cancer patients, 2 in bowel cancer, and 1 each in ovarian and lung cancer. Three of the 15 studies found a significant relationship between various objectively measured cognitively impaired domains and specific HRQoL outcomes. There was, however, only limited testing of the relationships between quantifiable cognitive dysfunction and HRQoL domains. This review suggests that in patients with solid tumours, where there is a relationship between chemotherapy treatment and cognitive impairment, the type and level of cognitive decline does not consistently appear to affect such patients' HRQoL. This could be partly explained by variations in study design, measures used, definitions of cognitive impairment, varying measurement time frames, small sample sizes, and differences in disease severity and type of treatment regimes.

International evaluation of the psychometrics of health-related quality of life questionnaires for use among long-term survivors of testicular and prostate cancer

BackgroundUnderstanding of the physical, functional and psychosocial health problems and needs of cancer survivors requires cross-national and cross-cultural standardization of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires that capture the full range of issues relevant to cancer survivors. To our knowledge, only one study has investigated in a comprehensive way whether a questionnaire used to evaluate HRQoL in cancer patients under active treatment is also reliable and valid when used among (long-term) cancer survivors. In this study we evaluated, in an international context, the psychometrics of HRQoL questionnaires for use among long-term, disease-free, survivors of testicular and prostate cancer.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, we recruited long-term survivors of testicular and prostate cancer from Northern and Southern Europe and from the United Kingdom who had participated in two phase III EORTC clinical trials. Participants completed the SF-36 Health Survey, the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, the QLQ-PR25 (for prostate cancer) or the QLQ-TC26 (for testicular cancer) questionnaires, and the Impact of Cancer questionnaire. Testicular cancer survivors also completed subscales from the Nordic Questionnaire for Monitoring the Age Diverse Workforce.ResultsTwo hundred forty-two men (66% response rate) were recruited into the study. The average time since treatment was more than 10 years. Overall, there were few missing questionnaire data, although scales related to sexuality, satisfaction with care and relationship concerns of men without partners were missing in more than 10% of cases. Debriefing showed that in general the questionnaires were accepted well. Many of the survivors scored at the upper extremes of the questionnaires, resulting in floor and ceiling effects in 64% of the scales. All of the questionnaires investigated met the threshold of 0.70 for group level reliability, with the exception of the QLQ-TC26 (mean reliability .64) and the QLQ-PR25 (mean reliability .69). The questionnaires were able to discriminate clearly between patients with and without comorbid conditions.ConclusionsThe currently available HRQoL questionnaires exhibit acceptable psychometric properties and were well received by patients, but additional efforts are needed to ensure that the full range of survivor-specific issues is assessed.

Changes in symptom patterns and health-related quality of life of cancer patients before and after chemotherapy

ObjectiveSymptom patterns are an important diagnostic concept in terms of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Although symptom patterns and health related quality of life (HRQOL) are common diagnostic measures for cancer patients, the association between them has not been studied. This study aimed to describe the changes in the pattern of symptoms of Yang-deficiency, Yin-deficiency, blood stasis, and HRQOL before and after chemotherapy, and to examine the association between the patterns and the cancer patients’ HRQOL. MethodsA panel study was undertaken with 123 cancer patients who were about to begin their first course of chemotherapy at four teaching hospitals in Taiwan. A structured questionnaire was used before and after chemotherapy. HRQOL was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Survey Short-Form 36. The Traditional Chinese Medical Constitutional Scale was used to measure Yang-deficiency, Yin-deficiency, and blood stasis patterns, with higher scores indicating a larger deficiency. ResultsThe patients had significantly worse scores for Yang-deficient pattern, Yin-deficiency pattern, blood stasis pattern, and the physical components of HRQOL after chemotherapy compared with before chemotherapy. The HRQOL scores correlated significantly with Yang-deficiency, Yin-deficiency, and the blood stasis pattern scores. A generalized estimating equation model showed that the HRQOL scores were significantly worse after chemotherapy compared with before chemotherapy for the physical component, but not for the mental component. Blood stasis pattern was significantly associated with a decreased HRQOL in both the physical and mental components. A hemoglobin level < 12 g/dL was associated with a worse physical component of HRQOL. ConclusionThe Yang-deficiency, Yin-deficiency, and blood stasis patterns were all associated with lower HRQOL in cancer patients after chemotherapy.

Performance status and depressive symptoms as predictors of quality of life in cancer patients. A structural equation modeling analysis.

This study aimed to examine whether depressive symptoms and performance status are independent predictors of both the physical and psychological domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in cancer patients. A sample of 4020 cancer patients (mean age 58 years, 51% women) was evaluated. Depressive symptoms were measured with the patient health questionnaire and HRQoL with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30. The impact of the illness on everyday activities was assessed with physician ratings of both the Karnofsky performance status and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The simultaneous effects of depression and performance status on quality of life outcomes were estimated using structural equation modeling. Both depressive symptoms and performance status independently predicted the physical and psychological domains of HRQoL. However, the impact of depressive symptoms on the physical HRQoL was stronger than the impact of performance status on the psychological HRQoL. Our results suggest that comorbid depressive symptoms are independently associated with both physical and psychological HRQoL in cancer patients after controlling for the physician-rated performance status. Thus, comorbid depression should be taken into account when evaluating reduced HRQoL in cancer patients. To support a causal impact of depression on HRQoL, intervention studies are needed to show that improving depression enhances cancer patients' HRQoL.