Health Of The Nation Outcome Scales For Children And Adolescents Research Articles

User satisfaction with child and adolescent mental health services: the association between user satisfaction and clinical outcomes

BackgroundThis study aimed to examine the association between user satisfaction and clinical outcomes with child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) from the perspective of young people and their parents. The evidence bases for CAMHS user satisfaction measures are limited, with few studies investigating the link between user satisfaction and clinical outcomes. In particular, the perspectives of young people are missing.MethodsThe parent and youth versions of the Experience of Service Questionnaire (ESQ), which evaluates the factors of general satisfaction (GS), satisfaction with care (SWC) and satisfaction with environment (SWE), were used to measure user satisfaction. The outcome measures were scores on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), Children’s Global Assessment Scale (CGAS), and Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA). Hierarchical regression analysis was conducted on data collected from 233 young people and 495 parents who utilized CAMHS services.ResultsGS and SWC predicted outcomes for both young people (ΔR2 = 0.08, p <.05) and parents (ΔR2 = 0.01, p <.05), indicating that user satisfaction had a significant impact on clinical outcomes for CAMHS users. In addition, GS and SWC significantly predicted young people-reported outcomes in the interaction model (ΔR2 = 0.10, p <.05), while no significant association was found with parent-reported outcomes (ΔR2 = 0.02, p =.09).ConclusionUser satisfaction, particularly for young people, has a significant impact on clinical outcomes. The causal relationship between user satisfaction and mental health outcomes requires further study.

Obsessive-compulsive disorder in treatment seeking children & adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Few studies have investigated the COVID-19 pandemic's effect on children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This study aims to investigate whether the pandemic is associated with increased referral of young people with OCD, any changes in their symptom severity and treatment offered. Service data were used to investigate 58 young people (8-17years) referred and assessed in the Central and Northwest London NHS Foundation Trust Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS), before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (months March-October 2018-2020). Changes in symptom severity were measured using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA). Patient records were reviewed to assess if COVID-19 had exacerbated symptoms. Type of treatment offered was compared. 26 (5.62%) assessments to CAMHS related to OCD in 2020, compared to 12 (1.30%) and 20 (2.27%) assessments pre-pandemic (2018 and 2019), showing a significant increase in the proportion of OCD cases (X2 (1, N = 58) = 20.3, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in any HoNOSCA dimensions on initial assessment. However, 69.2% of patients in 2020 showed symptom worsening over the COVID-period, versus 46.7% of cases first assessed pre-pandemic. Significantly more patients were discharged without being offered treatment pre-pandemic (X2 (2, N = 58) = 12.7, p = 0.002). In 2020, there was an 8.5% increase in the frequency of medication offered. The proportion of OCD cases in CAMHS increased in 2020 despite the overall number of CAMHS referrals falling. Furthermore, many cases reportedly worsened during the pandemic, and services will need to address the increased burden of more severe cases. Further larger investigation of this subject is warranted.

Routine outcome measurement in adolescents seeking mental health services: standardization of HoNOSCA in Kenyan sample

BackgroundThe evaluation of treatment outcomes is important for service providers to assess if there is improvement or not. The Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA) was developed for this use in child and adolescent mental health services. Outcome measurement in routine mental health services is limited. This paper evaluates the psychometric properties of the self and clinician rated versions of the HoNOSCA for routine use in child and adolescent mental health services in Kenya.MethodsUsing a prospective design, the clinician- and self-rated versions of the HoNOSCA and the Paediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC) were administered at the Youth Centre at the Kenyatta National Hospital in Nairobi. Initial ratings were obtained from adolescents 12-17 years (n = 201). A sample of 98 paired ratings with 2 follow-ups were examined for measurement of change over time.ResultsOur findings showed good reliability with the self-rated version of the HoNOSCA score, correlating well with the self-reported version of the PSC (r = .74, p < .001). Both versions correlated well at follow-up and were sensitive to change. Using factor analysis, the maximum likelihood factoring and Promax rotation resulted in a four-factor structure, which with a Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy of 0.8 explained 54.74% of total variance.ConclusionThe HoNOSCA appears to be of value, and easy to use in routine settings. Our findings suggest further investigation with a larger sample.

Obsessive compulsive disorder in treatment seeking children &amp; adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic

AimsFew studies have investigated the COVID-19 pandemic's effect on children and adolescents with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), who are thought to be particularly vulnerable. This study aims to investigate whether the COVID-19 pandemic is associated with increased referral of young people with OCD in one area of London and determine if COVID-19 has been associated with change in symptom severity and treatment offered in recent years.MethodA retrospective study was conducted using clinical service data investigating 58 young people (8–17 years) referred and assessed in CNWL NHS Foundation Trust CAMHS, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 (months March–October 2018–2020). Changes in symptom severity were measured using the health of the nation outcome scale for children and adolescents (HoNOSCA). Total HoNOSCA and three HoNOSCA items were used; emotional symptoms, family relationships and school attendance. Patient clinical records were reviewed to assess if COVID-19 had exacerbated OCD symptoms. The type of treatment offered (cognitive behavioural therapy -CBT- only vs combined CBT and medication) was also compared. Analysis was carried out using Chi-square, Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests.Result26 (5.62%) initial assessments to CAMHS were related to OCD in 2020, compared to 12 (1.30%) and 20 (2.27%) assessments pre-pandemic (2018 and 2019), showing a significant increase in the proportion of OCD cases (X2 (1, N = 58) = 20.3, p &lt; .001). There was no significant difference in total HoNOSCA, emotional, family relationships, or school attendance scores on initial assessment. However, 69.2% of clinical records in 2020 showed symptom worsening over the COVID-period, compared to 30.8% of cases assessed pre-pandemic.There was a significant difference between the type of treatment offered before and during COVID-19 (X2 (2, N = 58) = 12.7, p = .002), with a higher proportion of patients who were referred to CAMHS for OCD but discharged without treatment before the pandemic (37.5% vs 0%). While CBT only remains the most frequent treatment offered, combined treatment was more frequent during the pandemic, although this difference was not significant.ConclusionThe proportion of OCD-related initial assessments in CAMHS increased during the pandemic despite the overall number of referrals falling. Furthermore, fewer cases were discharged without treatment in CAMHS during this period. Given this, and that many were reported to have deteriorated during the pandemic, services will likely need to address the increased burden of more severe cases. Further research is warranted to assess the generalisability of our findings.

Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics in child and youth mental health; comparison of routine outcome measurements of an Australian and Dutch outpatient cohort.

Although of great value to understand the treatment results for mental health problems obtained in clinical practice, studies using naturalistic data from children and adolescents seeking clinical care because of complex mental health problems are limited. Cross-national comparison of naturalistic outcomes in this population is seldomly done. Although careful consideration is needed, such comparisons are likely to contribute to an open dialogue about cross-national differences and may stimulate service improvement. The aim of this observational study is to investigate clinical characteristics and outcomes in naturalistic cohorts of specialized child and adolescent mental health outpatient care in two different countries. Routinely collected data from 2013 to 2018 of 2715 outpatients in the Greater Area of Brisbane, Australia (CYMHS) and 1158 outpatients in Leiden, the Netherlands (LUMC-Curium) were analysed. Demographics, clinical characteristics and severity of problems at start and end of treatment were described, using Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS), Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA) and the parental Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-P). Routine outcome measures (CGAS, HoNOSCA, SDQ-P) showed moderate to severe mental health problems at start of treatment, which improved significantly over time in both cohorts. Effect sizes ranged between 0.73-0.90 (CYMHS) and 0.57-0.76 (LUMC-Curium). While internalizing problems (mood disorder, anxiety disorder and stress-related disorder) were more prevalent at CYMHS, externalizing developmental problems (ADHD, autism) prevailed at LUMC-Curium. Comorbidity (>1 diagnosis on ICD10/DSM-IV) was relatively similar: 45% at CYMHS and 39 % at LUMC-Curium. In both countries, improvement of functioning was lowest for conduct disorder and highest for somatoform/conversion disorders and obsessive-compulsive disorders (OCD). Overall, 20-40% showed clinically significant improvement (shift from clinical-range at start to a non-clinical-range at the end of treatment), but nearly half of patients still experienced significant symptoms at discharge. This large-scale outcome study showed both cohorts from Australia and the Netherlands improve during the course of treatment on clinician- and parent-reported measures. Although samples were situated within different contexts and differed in patient profiles, they showed similar trends in improvement per diagnostic group. While 20-40% showed clinically significant change, many patients experienced residual symptoms reflecting increased risk for negative outcome into adulthood. We emphasize cross-national comparison of naturalistic outcomes faces challenges, although it can similarly reveal trends in treatment outcome providing direction for future research: what factors determine discharge from specialized services; and how to improve current treatments in this severely affected population.

51.22 USING TELEPHONIC FOLLOW-UP TO ASSESS ADOLESCENT FUNCTIONING DURING THE COVID-19 SHUTDOWN IN HENAN, CHINA

Strict quarantine measures were placed throughout China to prevent the spread of COVID-19. We anticipated that the ongoing restrictions in mobility and daily activities would lead to interpersonal conflicts in families, especially between children and those parents who worked away from home year-round. By using telephonic follow-up, we aimed to assess the impact of the outbreak on the patients’ daily functioning and to reduce relapse rates. The Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA) and the Children’s Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) were administered to families of adolescents with recent mental health admissions at a participating hospital in Henan province, China. Interviews were conducted telephonically at 3 time points during the 3-month lockdown. Paired and unpaired t tests were employed to compare the functionality of children whose parents worked locally and lived with their children (G1) vs those whose parents worked outside the province and do not live in the home (G2). The study cohort consists of 48 adolescent patients in G1 and 93 patients in G2. The re-hospitalization rate was 2.2% compared to 4.5% in 2019 during the same period. CGAS total scores did not show group differences at each of the time points. There were significant changes in emotional difficulty subscores of HoNOSCA between the 2 time points, T1-T3 (p = 0.006) and T2-T3 (p < 0.0001), in group G2. The parent-child conflict scores in G2 between T1-T2 (p < 0.001) and T2-T3 (p = 0.007) were different significantly. On the other hand, group G1 did not experience significant emotional difficulty, but their online learning behavior deteriorated over time, at T1-T2 (p < 0.0001) and T2-T3 (p < 0.0001). Intergroup differences were seen in learning difficulties at T1 between the G1 and G2 groups (p = 0.016). In China, this is the first study providing telephonic intervention to a population of discharged adolescent patients who have no access to follow-up clinic visits. We found a significant change in adolescent emotional control, parent-child conflict, and online learning compliance in those adolescents whose parents left for work outside the province during the extended quarantine. This study can provide reference for future studies on COVID-19–related adolescent mental health.

Measure of clinical improvement in children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders: an evaluation of multiple perspectives with HoNOSCA.

Routine outcome assessment is helpful to inform decision-making, resource allocation, and health policy design. Routine outcome assessment in the hospital setting for children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders remains limited. The clinical instrument HoNOSCA (Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents), which has recently become available in Spanish and Catalan, allows outcome assessment in this population from the perspective of patients, their parents or legal guardians, and clinicians. HoNOSCA measures 13 areas of health and psychosocial functioning. The aim of this study was to assess mental health outcomes in psychiatric day hospital pediatric patients from three perspectives (patient, par-ent/legal guardian, clinician), using the Spanish and Catalan versions of HoNOSCA. We recruited patients up to 18 years old with any psychiatric disorder at the day unit of the Salut Mental Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari (Sabadell, Catalonia, Spain). We obtained admission and discharge HoNOSCA scores for the patients, their parents or legal guardians, and their clinicians. We recruited 99 patients over the study period (January 2015 to December 2017), 11 of which were lost to follow-up. Among the remaining 88, we found significant improvement in HoNOSCA scores from admission to discharge. Agreement between the HoNOSCA scores for the three different groups of evaluators (patients, parents/legal guardians, and clinicians) was weak at admission but better at discharge. In general, evaluations from patients and their parents or legal guardians had lower HoNOSCA scores (indicating a better mental health status) at admis-sion compared to those from clinicians. At discharge, however, the scores were more homogenous across the three groups of stakeholders. Use of HoNOSCA allows for routine evaluation of mental health outcomes in the psychiatric day hospital setting from the perspective of pa-tients, their parents or legal guardians, and clinicians.

Intensive home treatment for adolescents in psychiatric crisis

BackgroundAdolescents with acute psychiatric disorders are typically treated with long-term clinical admission. However, long term admission may be associated with a variety of negative outcomes. This pilot study presents a new model of care, that is, the combined application of intensive home treatment and the possibility of short term stay at a psychiatric high & intensive care.MethodsIn total 112 referred adolescents with mixed diagnoses participated in this longitudinal observational design. Clinical outcome was measured by the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA) which measures the severity of multiple mental health problems. The HoNOSCA was clinician-rated at intake, after two months and after four months at discharge. Change in HoNOSCA total score was analysed with paired t-tests. Outcome moderators were gender, age, primary diagnosis, clinical admission, home treatment-time, medication and additional therapies. Follow up data were completed for 62 patients after two months and for 53 after four months.ResultsParticipants aged between 11 and 18 years (M = 14.8 years, SD = 0.3; 52% female). Mean HoNOSCA total score at intake was 18.8 (SD = 5.2), after two months 13.0 (SD = 5.0); after four months resulting in a score of 9.3 (SD = 5.2). None of the moderators tested showed a significant effect on HoNOSCA scores. However, a control group could not be used because of the severe psychopathology and high risk for suicidality and the lack of an effective treatment intervention for a comparable study group.ConclusionWith a symptom decrease of over 50% within four months as measured by the HoNOSCA, including less risk for hospitalization, this new model appears promising and of clinical relevance. Nevertheless, further research regarding stability of treatment outcome is warranted and evaluation of long-term effects of this model in follow-up studies is needed.

Reliable and clinically significant change based on the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales

To evaluate treatment outcomes of individual patients based on clinician-rated instruments, the assessment of reliable and clinically significant change (RCSC) is essential. In heterogeneous samples, RCSC underestimates treatment outcome. Therefore, the Reliable Change Index (RCI) was adjusted by a stratification into subsamples. This method was tested on the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA) ratings (n = 12,547) at admission and discharge of youths (age 6-18 years) treated in ten psychiatric institutions. Based on the test-retest reliability of a subsample (n = 397), the RCI was calculated for three severity groups ("very severe," "moderately severe," and "subclinical/mild"). Individuals who accomplished reliable change during treatment and moved to a subclinical score were classified as recovered. Using the traditional RCSC calculation, the large majority (75.1%) of the sample would be considered as unchanged, 2.9% as deteriorated, 18.9% as improved, and 3.1% as recovered. Using RCI cutoff points based on the severity ratings at admission results in a more representative distribution of outcome groups, where 54.6% of the sample was stable, 7.5% worsened, 21.6% improved, and 16.3% recovered. This methodological framework for calculating RCSC for heterogeneous populations is applicable for all HoNOS instruments, making it very useful for mental health professionals.

A profile of adolescents admitted to a private inpatient unit and mental health outcomes.

To characterise adolescents admitted to a voluntary adolescent inpatient unit and investigate treatment outcomes. A retrospective cohort design was employed. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA) pre- and post-admission scores were collected, measuring global functioning. Demographic variables such as age, gender, primary diagnosis, comorbidity and length of stay (LOS) were analysed. Data were collected from May 2017 to April 2018. All adolescents admitted to the inpatient unit were included. The majority of adolescents (n = 72; HoNOSCA data available on n = 57) were 16 years of age (26%), female (82%) and with a primary diagnosis of a mood disorder (57%). Most adolescents improved at the time of discharge. Self-injury and emotional symptoms had greater reductions according to clinician and adolescent-self-ratings (p < 0.01). Mean change (improvement) in HoNOSCA total score was 7.3 (SD 7.5) based on clinician ratings and 7.2 (SD 9.5) for adolescent-self-ratings. The mean LOS was 28 days (SD 15.8). The inpatient unit proved effective at meeting the needs of young people in terms of symptom stabilisation. Further research is needed to describe adolescent inpatient models of care, the operations and philosophies to better examine how these relate to treatment outcomes.

Use of self-report outcome measures in an acute inpatient CAMHS setting.

Outcome measures are increasingly being used to index change in service users' presentation. However, within Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS), these raise questions around what should be measured, who should be asked to rate outcome and what constitutes progress. This study sought to audit the value of two self-report measures within the inpatient adolescent setting. An admission sample of 67 young people completed the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS) and Young Person's Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (YP CORE), with clinicians completing the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) and Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA). A follow-up dataset consisted of 20 young people who completed the measures on two occasions, with clinician ratings completed on admission and discharge. The RCADS and YP CORE measures showed discriminant and convergent reliability and appeared to index change in the current inpatient sample of adolescents. Self-report of symptoms and general functioning were closely related. There was little relationship between self-report and clinician ratings, emphasising the importance of collating self-report in addition to clinician ratings.

Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA): Psychometric properties of the Italian version

The Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA) assesses mental health and social functioning of people <18 years. We explored the psychometric properties of the HoNOSCA Italian version. Dimensionality was assessed by Exploratory Factor Analysis and validated using Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Internal consistency and reliability of the factorial structure were evaluated. One hundred thirty-four subjects were assessed by HoNOSCA, Clinical Global Impression and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for concurrent validity. Intraclass correlation was computed to evaluate inter-rater reliability using eight vignettes assessed by 35 professionals.Exploratory Factor Analysis identified two correlated subscales and Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed good fit to data. Cronbach's alpha was 0.65. HoNOSCA subscale scores increased with Clinical Global Impression severity and correlated positively with Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Predictive power to discriminate between two Clinical Global Impression groups was good. The minimal difference in total score corresponding to a marked clinical change was 9, the clinically reliable change was 10. This should be considered when using the HoNOSCA as outcome measure. Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.71 for the total score. The need for a comprehensive assessment for child mental health and behaviour in Italian services can be met by the HoNOSCA if used as cumulative bivariate subscales.

Validation of the Spanish and Catalan versions of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA)

Outcome measurement in outpatient and day-care mental health facilities for children and adolescents in Spain remains limited, in part due to a lack of validated scales. To address this issue, we translated HoNOSCA (glossary, score sheet, self-rated questionnaire, and parent/legal guardian questionnaire) into Spanish and Catalan using a reverse translation approach. We ascertained the validity and psychometric quality of the HoNOSCA in Spanish by assessing correlation with the Children's Global Assessment Scale (C-GAS). We recruited 64 participants 7–17 years of age in five day-care Psychiatry hospitals in Catalonia (Spain). Two evaluators administered both instruments twice, two weeks apart. Patients and parents/legal guardians completed the corresponding HoNOSCA versions. We calculated Cronbach's alpha for assessing internal consistency, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) for inter-rater and test-retest reliability, and Pearson's correlation coefficients for validity. We found that all HoNOSCA versions in Spanish presented satisfactory internal consistency, inter-rater and test-retest reliability. Concurrent validity for HoNOSCA-Glossary was also acceptable, with Pearson's coefficients of −0.543 and −0.519 for evaluators in the first administration, and of −0.675 and −0.685 in the second administration. HoNOSCA was also successfully translated into Catalan; acceptability was determined using cognitive interviews.

Outcomes of inpatient psychiatric treatment for adolescents: A multiple perspectives evaluation.

Adolescent inpatient psychiatric treatment was evaluated from the multiple perspectives of clinicians, young people and parents using standardised measures and goal-based outcomes (GBOs). The sample included cases ( N = 128) discharged from a London adolescent unit between April 2009 and December 2015. Measures were completed at admission and discharge, and change in ratings was analysed to assess treatment outcomes. Ratings of clinicians and young people on the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA) were compared. Adolescents demonstrated significant improvement across all measures from admission to discharge. Correlation between clinicians' and adolescents' HoNOSCA ratings was weak at admission ( r = .25) but stronger at discharge ( r = .63). Standardised effect sizes were larger for GBOs ( d = 1.73 and 3.16 for adolescent and clinician-rated goals, respectively) compared to all standardised measures ( d = 0.31-0.93). Improvement was observed across all measures of functioning and symptoms following inpatient treatment. Clinicians and young people developed better shared understanding of the problems from admission to discharge. GBOs are more sensitive to change compared to standardised measures and may be meaningfully adopted by inpatient units for routine outcome monitoring.

Protocol for a cohort study of adolescent mental health service users with a nested cluster randomised controlled trial to assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of managed transition in improving transitions from child to adult mental health services (the MILESTONE study)

IntroductionDisruption of care during transition from child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) to adult mental health services may adversely affect the health and well-being of service users. The MILESTONE...

HoNOSCA-D As a Measure of the Severity of Diagnosed Mental Disorders in Children and Adolescents-Psychometric Properties of the German Translation.

The Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA), in use worldwide, is a 13-item measure assessing the biopsychosocial severity of mental health problems in children and adolescents. This article introduces the authorized German-language version of HoNOSCA, the HoNOSCA-D, and examines and discusses its psychometric properties based on a clinical sample of 1,533 children and adolescents aged 4;0 to 17;11 years. For the HoNOSCA-D total score (severity of mental health problems), internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) was 0.63. The discriminative power of the items ranged from 0.07 to 0.44; the average interitem correlation was 0.11. Due to this stochastic independence, calculation of a total severity index is acceptable. Using factor analysis, the principal axis factoring and varimax rotation resulted in a four-factor structure, which with a Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy of 0.684 explained 30.62% of total variance. The convergent correlations with the German-language parent report version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire were as expected and showed a medium effect size. Gender and age differences in the HoNOSCA-D total score were small. Regarding the 13 items gender and age differences were negligible to medium. The highest severity was found for schizophrenia and psychotic disorders, followed by affective disorders and social behavior disorders. Overall, validity of HoNOSCA-D was clearly supported.

Can the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents predict the necessity of inpatient stay during assertive community treatment?

Understanding the trajectories of youths within Child and Adolescents Mental Health Service (CAMHS) is of primary importance. Our objective is to assess the usefulness of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA) to predict inpatient (IP) stay for youths followed by assertive community treatment (ACT) teams. 82 youths followed exclusively by ACT and 42 who needed IP were assessed with the HoNOSCA at admission to the program. The HoNOSCA allowed the computing of three scores: a total score, an externalizing symptoms (Ext) score and an emotional problems (Emo) score. Logistic regressions revealed that the three HoNOSCA scores at admission of ACT predicted later need for hospitalization. Using ROC curve analyses, we set up cut off scores with appropriate sensitivity and specificity for the HoNOSCA Total and Ext to optimally predict the need for hospitalization. This study revealed that the HoNOSCA may be a useful tool to predict the need for later IP during ACT. Such knowledge is important to set up the best therapeutic strategies.

Clinical Utility of the 2 New Scales of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA): A Naturalistic, Prospective Study in a Psychiatric Unit for Adolescents.

The goal of this study was to assess the clinical usefulness of the emotional symptoms (Emo) and externalizing problems (Ext) scales compared with the Total score on the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA). The HoNOSCA was rated at admission and discharge for 260 adolescent inpatients. The primary outcomes assessed were (a) the sensitivity of the 3 HoNOSCA scores to clinical improvement; and (b) the between diagnoses discriminative value of these scores. Analyses of variances [2 (time: admission vs. discharge) × 5 (diagnostic groups)] revealed a main effect of time for the 3 scores, a main effect of the diagnostic group for the Total and Ext scores, and an interaction effect between time and diagnosis for the Emo score. A moderate correlation was observed between the change in Ext and Emo scores between admission and discharge. These 2 new scales of the HoNOSCA demonstrated good clinical utility and the ability to assess different aspects of clinical improvements. A significant discriminative value of both scores was observed. The clinical utility of the 2 new scales on the HoNOSCA was established. These 2 new scales provided a sensitive measure of clinical outcome for assessing improvement between admission and discharge on a psychiatric inpatient unit for adolescents, regardless of diagnostic group, and captured additional information about clinical improvements. Adolescents with psychosis and conduct disorders presented with higher externalizing symptoms than those with other disorders, as rated on the HoNOSCA, at admission and discharge. The Emo score differentiated between clinical improvement in patients with psychosis versus eating disorders. The sample in this study represented a homogeneous population of adolescent inpatients, so that further research is needed before these findings can be generalized to outpatients. In addition, the small number of patients in some diagnostic groups did not allow for their inclusion in some of the statistical analyses.

Inpatient Children and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS): outcomes of young people with and without intellectual disability.

Little is known about the effectiveness of inpatient care for young people with co-morbid mental illness and intellectual disability (ID). This study aims to compare the demographics and outcome of young people with mental illness with or without ID admitted to psychiatric hospital. A secondary aim is to look into the outcome of those with ID admitted to general mental health young people's units. Data were collected on the outcome of young people's admissions to specialist ID and general adolescent mental health units as part of a larger quality improvement project run by the College Centre for Quality Improvement. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA) scores were completed by local clinical staff at admission and discharge on 38 young people with and 113 people without ID from 14 units. Young people with mental disorders significantly improved clinically over the admission whether or not they had ID. There were no differences between the groups in age or use of the Mental Health Act but people admitted with ID were more likely to be male and had longer lengths of stay. Admission to a general adolescent unit was associated with clinical improvement for people with ID. This study needs replication because of the small sample and incomplete data but it suggests that young people with ID and mental disorders significantly improve clinically when admitted to hospital as do their non-disabled peers.

Psychometric Properties of the Revised Chen Internet Addiction Scale (CIAS-R) in Chinese Adolescents

The Revised Chen Internet Addiction Scale (CIAS-R) was developed to assess Internet addiction in Chinese populations, but its psychometric properties in adolescents have not been examined. This study aimed to evaluate the factor structure and psychometric properties of CIAS-R in Hong Kong Chinese adolescents. 860 Grade 7 to 13 students (38% boys) completed the CIAS-R, the Young's Internet Addiction Test (IAT), and the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA) in a survey. The prevalence of Internet addiction as assessed by CIAS-R was 18%. High internal consistency and inter-item correlations were reported for the CIAS-R. Results from the confirmatory factor analysis suggested a four-factor structure of Compulsive Use and Withdrawal, Tolerance, Interpersonal and Health-related Problems, and Time Management Problems. Moreover, results of hierarchical multiple regression supported the incremental validity of the CIAS-R to predict mental health outcomes beyond the effects of demographic differences and self-reported time spent online. The CIAS is a reliable and valid measure of internet addiction problems in Hong Kong adolescents. Future study is warranted to validate the cutoffs of the CIAS-R for identification of adolescents with Internet use problems who may have mental health needs.