Cases In Healthcare Workers Research Articles

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Exposure to COVID-19 Pandemic among Health Care Workers in Babylon, Iraq

Abstract Background: COVID-19 is an extremely infectious disease. Health care workers (HCWs) are exposed to high occupational risk because of Coronavirus. Objectives: To study the prevalence and risk factors of exposure to COVID-19 among HCWs. Materials and Methods: The study design was cross-sectional and consisted of 527 participants of HCWs, Data was collected through direct interviews by using simple Random Sampling) technique, the questionnaire format was built exclusively by the researchers for this purpose and consisted of four axes which included socio-demographic variables, COVID-19 prevalence, vaccination status, and risk factors. Furthermore; Laboratory examinations were used in this study to detect newly infected cases of HCWs, we screened HCWs for SARS-CoV-2 via RT-PCR. The study period started from October 2, 2022 until May 30, 2023. This study was conducted at Babylon Health Directorate, Babylon governorate. Results: The findings indicate that a majority of HCWs participating in this study were in the age group 26–30 years 146 (27.7%), and predominantly females 302 (57.3%), 344 (65.3%) were residents in urban regions, with 228 (43.3%) holding technical diploma degree and nursing professionals makeup 201 (38.1%) of occupational titles, and most of them were working in emergency units 107 (20.3%). The results registered 352 (66.8%) of HCWs were infected previously with COVID-19, and 64 (12.1%) new infected cases diagnosed by RT-PCR, largely among paramedical staff 40 (20.3%), and a highly recorded at Al-Hashimiyah health sector 26 (11.9%). Data analysis reveals that a significant association between infection and some risk variables regards participants who visited epidemiological units, and those who visited physician clinics during the pandemic. Results suggest a significant association between not being vaccinated and COVID-19 infection. Additionally, the participants with chronic diseases were more likely to be infected compared to those without chronic diseases (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The study concluded that COVID-19 was prevalent among HCWs and significantly associated with some health and occupational risk factors.

Healthcare Workers' SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Four Hospital Outbreaks during Delta Variant Prevalence in Sydney, Australia.

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections due to occupational exposure. The use of airborne personal protective equipment (PPE) significantly reduces this risk. In June 2021, an epidemic of the Delta variant began in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Concurrent PPE guidelines, set by the Clinical Excellence Commission (CEC), restricted the use of respirators. To understand the relationship of PPE guidelines with workplace-acquired HCW SARS-CoV-2 infections in different clinical settings and to examine the relationship between rates of community transmission and workplace-acquired HCW infections during the Delta outbreak in NSW. Total SARS-CoV-2 HCW infections between 13 June and 30 October 2021 (first four months of the Delta wave) were estimated from the government COVID-19 surveillance reports and compared with the surveillance reports of community transmission. In the absence of a detailed reporting of HCW infections, open-source data including news articles, media releases, and epidemiological surveillance reports were also collected. Data were extracted on HCW cases of SARS-CoV-2 from four hospitals, including the number of HCW cases (per NSW Health definition), clinical setting, PPE guidelines, and evidence of increasing local transmission. SARS-CoV-2 infections in HCW identified as workplace-acquired infections (n = 177) and those without a known transmission source (n = 532) increased during the period of increasing community transmission (n = 75,014) in NSW. Four hospital COVID-19 clusters affecting 20 HCWs were identified between June and October 2021. HCW clusters occurred in general wards where staff were recommended to wear surgical masks. No workplace-acquired HCW infections were reported in these hospitals from critical care wards, where respirators were recommended during the same outbreak weeks. Differences in PPE policy across different wards may leave healthcare staff at risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. During periods of high community transmission, respirators should be provided to protect hospital staff. Formal reporting of HCW infections should occur.

Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine in Spanish healthcare workers

IntroductionFrontline health care workers (HCW) have higher risk than the general population to become infected by SARS.CoV.2, so they were a priority group for Covid-19 vaccine administration. We compared the incidence and prevalence of HCW infected pre-and post-vaccination with the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Material and methodsProspective observational study carried out between 01/12/20 and 07/03/21 in La Paz University Hospital, Madrid (Spain). SARS.CoV.2 positive cases in HCW after vaccination were collected and compared to those hospitalized COVID-19 patients at the same hospital. ResultsTwo weeks after finishing the first round of vaccinations daily new cases of HCW infections (symptomatic and asymptomatic) decreased substantially and cumulative cases of infected HCW and hospitalized COVID-19 patients started to diverge. No new positive cases of HCW infection were registered seven days after the second dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. ConclusionsBNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine is highly effective in Spanish HCW.

Infection and Severity of COVID-19 Infection Among Healthcare Workers: A Report from Egypt.

A cross-sectional study was performed that included one hundred health care workers that were confirmed by PCR to be COVID-19 cases admitted to Assiut University Hospital over six months between May 2020 and November 2020. All participants were subjected to thorough history taking and full clinical examination as well as investigations. Out of the 100 HCWs enrolled in the study, 52% were males, 26% were obese, 68% were doctors, and 38% were from the medical department. Fourteen percent of healthcare workers were admitted to ICU, of which 93% were cured. The predictors for severity of cases were as follows: being a doctor OR (6.804) P=0.037, old age OR (1.179) P=0.000, and hospital stay OR (0.838) P=0.015. Health care workers are at risk for severe COVID-19 infection. Being a doctor, old age, and duration of hospitalization were the predictors for the severity of cases of health care workers.

COVID-19 Cases Among Congregate Care Facility Staff by Neighborhood of Residence and Social and Structural Determinants: Observational Study.

BackgroundDisproportionate risks of COVID-19 in congregate care facilities including long-term care homes, retirement homes, and shelters both affect and are affected by SARS-CoV-2 infections among facility staff. In cities across Canada, there has been a consistent trend of geographic clustering of COVID-19 cases. However, there is limited information on how COVID-19 among facility staff reflects urban neighborhood disparities, particularly when stratified by the social and structural determinants of community-level transmission.ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the concentration of cumulative cases by geography and social and structural determinants across 3 mutually exclusive subgroups in the Greater Toronto Area (population: 7.1 million): community, facility staff, and health care workers (HCWs) in other settings.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, observational study using surveillance data on laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases (January 23 to December 13, 2020; prior to vaccination rollout). We derived neighborhood-level social and structural determinants from census data and generated Lorenz curves, Gini coefficients, and the Hoover index to visualize and quantify inequalities in cases.ResultsThe hardest-hit neighborhoods (comprising 20% of the population) accounted for 53.87% (44,937/83,419) of community cases, 48.59% (2356/4849) of facility staff cases, and 42.34% (1669/3942) of other HCW cases. Compared with other HCWs, cases among facility staff reflected the distribution of community cases more closely. Cases among facility staff reflected greater social and structural inequalities (larger Gini coefficients) than those of other HCWs across all determinants. Facility staff cases were also more likely than community cases to be concentrated in lower-income neighborhoods (Gini 0.24, 95% CI 0.15-0.38 vs 0.14, 95% CI 0.08-0.21) with a higher household density (Gini 0.23, 95% CI 0.17-0.29 vs 0.17, 95% CI 0.12-0.22) and with a greater proportion working in other essential services (Gini 0.29, 95% CI 0.21-0.40 vs 0.22, 95% CI 0.17-0.28).ConclusionsCOVID-19 cases among facility staff largely reflect neighborhood-level heterogeneity and disparities, even more so than cases among other HCWs. The findings signal the importance of interventions prioritized and tailored to the home geographies of facility staff in addition to workplace measures, including prioritization and reach of vaccination at home (neighborhood level) and at work.

A two-ward acute care hospital outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 delta variant including a point-source outbreak associated with the use of a mobile vital signs cart and sub-optimal doffing of personal protective equipment

BackgroundWe conducted a detailed epidemiological investigation of a linked 2-ward COVID-19 Delta variant outbreak to elucidate its source, risk factors, and control measures.MethodsInvestigations included epidemiologic analysis, detailed case review serial SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing of patients and healthcare workers (HCWs), viral culture, environmental swabbing, HCW-unaware personal protective equipment (PPE) audits, ventilation assessments, and the use of whole genome sequencing (WGS).ResultsThis linked 2-ward outbreak resulted in 17 patient and 12 HCW cases, despite an 83% vaccination rate. In this setting suboptimal adherence and compliance to PPE protocols, suboptimal hand hygiene, multi-bedded rooms, and a contaminated vital signs cart (VSC) with potential fomite or spread via the hands of HCWs were identified as significant risk factors for nosocomial COVID-19 infection.Sudden onset of symptoms, within 72h, was observed in 79% of all Ward 2 patients and 93% of all cases (patients and HCWs) on Ward 2 occurred within one incubation period, consistent with a point source outbreak. RT-PCR assays showed low Cycle threshold (Ct) values, indicating high viral load from environmental swabs including the VSC. WGS results with ≤ 3 SNP differences between specimens were observed.ConclusionsOutbreaks on both wards settled rapidly, within 3 weeks, using a ‘back-to-basics’ approach without extraordinary measures or changes to standard PPE requirements. Strict adherence to recommended PPE, hand hygiene, education, assistance from infected cases (interviews and testing), and additional measures such as limiting movement of patients and staff temporarily were all deemed to have contributed to prompt resolution of the outbreak.

Assessment of Anxiety, Depression, Work-Related Stress, and Burnout in Health Care Workers (HCWs) Affected by COVID-19: Results of a Case-Control Study in Italy.

This study aims to investigate whether HCWs infected with COVID-19 may experience potential psychological consequences and a higher incidence of depression, anxiety, work-related stress, and burnout compared to non-infected HCWs. A case–control study with 774 participants was conducted comparing COVID-19-infected HCWs (cases) and non-infected HCWs (controls) from the Occupational Medicine Unit at the Teaching Hospital Policlinico Umberto I, who were administered the same questionnaire including Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Copenhagen Burnout Inventory and Karasek’s Job Content Questionnaire. No differences in the levels of burnout and decision latitude were found between the two groups. Cases showed higher level of anxiety and job demand compared to controls. In contrast, levels of depression in the case group were significantly lower compared to the control group. The results are indicating the need for workplace health promotion activities based on stress and burnout management and prevention. Multiple organizational and work-related interventions can lower the impact of mental health-related issues in the COVID-19 pandemics, including the improvement of workplace infrastructures, as well as the adoption of correct and shared anti-contagion measures, which must include regular personal protective equipment supply, and the adoption of training programs that deal with mental health-related issues.

Sars-Cov-2 exposures of healthcare workers and acquisition of COVID-19

Healthcare workers (HCWs) may be considered at a higher risk given their frequent contact and exposure to patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. As of June 1, 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported 4 626 570 cases in HCWs from 150 reporting countries and territories with cases in HCWs generally following the population pattern waves [1]. The HCWs exposure to SARS-CoV-2 can occur during direct patient care in healthcare settings, during interactions with other HCWs, during work-related travel, and within the community and/or households [2].

The role and relevance of asymptomatic healthcare worker testing in COVID-19 hospital outbreaks

Background: Many healthcare facilities have faced the decision of conducting point prevalence testing (PPT) of healthcare workers (HCW) during COVID-19 outbreaks. As a containment strategy, PPT can identify asymptomatic or presymptomatic cases for isolation. It is less clear how useful testing asymptomatic HCW is in understanding the spread and possible routes of transmission in an outbreak. This study investigated HCW cases identified through PPT during acute-care outbreaks in Fraser Health (FH), British Columbia, incorporating both epidemiological and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data to determine their epidemiological source. Methods: This study was a retrospective review of cases associated with COVID-19 acute-care outbreaks in FH occurring between December 2020 and June 2021, when most of these infections were of the alpha and gamma lineages. All patients and HCWs with a positive COVID-19 test and epidemiologically linked to the outbreaks were included in the study. WGS results supported determination of epidemiological source for cases. The proportion of patient and HCW cases related to the outbreak was compared. All analyses were conducted using SAS version 4.3 software with the PROC GLM package. Results: Between December 2020 and June 2021, 49 acute-care COVID-19 outbreaks were declared. Point-prevalence testing of HCWs, in addition to routine patient PPT, was conducted in 28 outbreaks (57%), with 2,167 eligible HCWs (63%) tested. Testing identified 14 previously unknown HCW cases, representing 12.96% of all HCW cases epidemiologically linked to the outbreaks. None of these HCWs were determined to be the index case for their associated outbreak. There was no statistically significant difference between HCWs and patients regarding WGS failure rate, and all failed samples were removed from further analysis. Patients were 3.8 times as likely as HCWs to present as symptomatic when testing positive. HCWs were 2.2 times as likely as patients to have WGS results unrelated to the outbreak. Discussion: Although point-prevalence testing of HCW identified previously unknown cases, these cases were more likely than patients to be unrelated to the outbreak and therefore less useful in understanding the epidemiology of the outbreak. It is difficult to determine whether HCW PPT was effective at preventing transmission, especially with robust infection prevention measures already in place. Patients were more likely than HCWs to present as asymptomatic, however this may be due to the attribution of symptoms to other conditions. Conclusions: Point prevalence testing of HCWs during COVID-19 outbreaks may assist with preventing transmission but is less likely to contribute meaningful information to the investigation.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Healthcare-associated COVID-19 outbreaks: a nationwide population-based cohort study

BackgroundHealthcare-associated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has significant implications for patients, their companions and healthcare workers (HCWs). Controlling transmission in healthcare settings is critical to reduce deaths due to COVID-19.AimTo describe the epidemiology and characteristics of healthcare-associated COVID-19 outbreaks and outbreak-related cases.MethodsThe investigation data for each healthcare-associated outbreak that occurred between 15th January 2020 and 31st July 2021 in Taiwan were analysed retrospectively. Confirmed outbreak-associated cases were categorized as HCW cases, patient companion cases or patient cases, and the characteristics of the confirmed cases were compared between these categories.FindingsIn total, 54 healthcare-associated COVID-19 outbreaks including 512 confirmed cases were reported. The median number of affected cases per outbreak was six [interquartile range (IQR) 2–12], and the median outbreak duration was 12 days (IQR 4.3–17.0). Only 5.7% and 0.2% of all confirmed cases were partially and fully vaccinated, respectively. Most outbreaks (90%, 48/54) occurred in May and June 2021. HCW cases, companion cases and patient cases accounted for 19.5%, 41.2% and 39.3% of the total cases. Patient cases were significantly older (median age 72 years, IQR 61–83) and had higher 30-day all-cause mortality (37.4%) than HCW cases (median age 41 years, IQR 28–58, 0%) and companion cases (median age 52 years; IQR 42–62, 1%).ConclusionHealthcare-associated COVID-19 outbreaks have a critical impact on patients. Nevertheless, two-thirds of cases in the healthcare-associated outbreaks in this study comprised HCWs and companions. In order to effectively mitigate COVID-19 transmission in healthcare settings, multi-pronged infection prevention and control measures should be implemented and tailored for these three groups.

Clinico-Genomic Analysis Reiterates Mild Symptoms Post-vaccination Breakthrough: Should We Focus on Low-Frequency Mutations?

Vaccine development against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been of primary importance to contain the ongoing global pandemic. However, studies have demonstrated that vaccine effectiveness is reduced and the immune response is evaded by variants of concern (VOCs), which include Alpha, Beta, Delta, and, the most recent, Omicron. Subsequently, several vaccine breakthrough (VBT) infections have been reported among healthcare workers (HCWs) due to their prolonged exposure to viruses at healthcare facilities. We conducted a clinico-genomic study of ChAdOx1 (Covishield) VBT cases in HCWs after complete vaccination. Based on the clinical data analysis, most of the cases were categorized as mild, with minimal healthcare support requirements. These patients were divided into two sub-phenotypes based on symptoms: mild and mild plus. Statistical analysis showed a significant correlation of specific clinical parameters with VBT sub-phenotypes. Viral genomic sequence analysis of VBT cases revealed a spectrum of high- and low-frequency mutations. More in-depth analysis revealed the presence of low-frequency mutations within the functionally important regions of SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Emphasizing the potential benefits of surveillance, low-frequency mutations, D144H in the N gene and D138Y in the S gene, were observed to potentially alter the protein secondary structure with possible influence on viral characteristics. Substantiated by the literature, our study highlights the importance of integrative analysis of pathogen genomic and clinical data to offer insights into low-frequency mutations that could be a modulator of VBT infections.

Coronavirus Disease-19 Testing Strategies for Patients and Health Care Workers to Improve Workplace Safety.

Tests to detect active viral infection and related immune response in the staff and patients attending health care facilities effectively identified positive cases presenting with or without symptoms of coronavirus disease (COVID)-19. Subsequent home isolation of these contagious cases helped curb the chance of the spread of infection at the workplace. Furthermore, serologic tests conducted postvaccination facilitated the detection of individuals with poor immune response following active immunization that would likely require further safety measures to protect themselves from contracting the infection in health care facilities.

COVID-19 post-vaccination in healthcare workers and vaccine effectiveness, Brazil, 2021

ObjectsThis study aimed to describe COVID-19 cases in healthcare workers at a large tertiary hospital, after a vaccination campaign, to understand the individual characteristics, timeliness, symptomatology, and severity of the conditions. MethodsThe COVID-19 reporting files from the hospital's healthcare workers and their records in the vaccine registry were analyzed, regarding vaccination status, symptoms, sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes. Vaccination descriptive analysis was carried out and the impact and effectiveness of vaccination in relation to symptomatic infection and hospitalization were estimated. ResultsIn a total of 696 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients, vaccination coverage for the 1st and 2nd dose was 92.8% and 85.5%. Patients with complete doses had a mean interval of 96.8 days between vaccination and the onset of symptoms. Of the 664 participants with available clinical data, 165 had at least 1 comorbidity. During the study, 12 patients were hospitalized, 58.3% with a complete vaccination schedule. Three of this group died. The effectiveness of vaccination for symptomatic cases and hospitalization was 22.1% and 69.0%, respectively. The impact of vaccination on symptomatic cases and hospitalization was 81.4% and 89.7%, respectively. DiscussionThe majority of COVID-19 cases in the study were classified as mild. The impact of vaccination for confirmed cases was significant, both in reducing the incidence of symptomatic cases and hospitalizations. The presence of comorbidities in approximately ¼ of the patients increased the risk of these individuals. The mean time interval between diagnosis and the 2nd dose of vaccine was longer in the hospitalized group, reinforcing the protective decline over longer periods.

Transmission of COVID-19 among healthcare workers - an epidemiological study during the first phase of the pandemic in Sweden.

Abstract During the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, concerns were raised that healthcare workers (HCWs) were at high risk of infection. The aim of this study was to explore the transmission of COVID-19 among HCWs during a staff outbreak at an inpatient ward in Sweden 1 March to 31 May 2020. A mixed-methods approach was applied using several data sources. In total, 152 of 176 HCWs participated. The incidence of COVID-19 among HCWs was 33%. Among cases, 48 (96%) performed activities involving direct contact with COVID-19 patients. Contact tracing connected 78% of cases to interaction with another contagious co-worker. Only a few HCW cases reported contact with a confirmed COVID-19 case at home (n = 6; 12%) or in the community (n = 3; 6%). Multiple logistic regression identified direct care of COVID-19 patients and positive COVID-19 family contact as risk factors for infection (adjusted OR 8.4 and 9.0 respectively). Main interventions to stop the outbreak were physical distancing between HCWs, reinforcement of personal hygiene routines and rigorous surface cleaning. The personal protective equipment used in contact with patients was not changed in response to the outbreak. We highlight HCW-to-HCW transmission of COVID-19 in a hospital environment and the importance of preventing droplet and contact transmission between co-workers.

Risk of Secondary Household Transmission of COVID-19 from Health Care Workers in a Hospital in Spain.

Hospital health care workers are at high risk of developing COVID-19 and transmitting the disease to their family upon returning home; the aim here is to estimate the secondary attack rate of COVID-19 in household contacts of health care workers and their transmission risk factors. COVID-19 cases in the health care workers of an academic hospital in Pamplona, Spain, from 2 March to 26 May 2020, were followed up. The secondary attack rate (SAR) was estimated from cases in household contacts of index cases and their risk factors by Poisson regression. 89 index cases were studied from 99 notified cases in health care workers (89.0%), excluding secondary cases or those who lived alone. Forty-six secondary cases confirmed by the laboratory were found among 326 household contacts, a secondary attack rate of 14.11% (95% CI 10.75-18.31), and 33 household contacts with acute infection symptoms without microbiologic confirmation 10.12% (95% CI 7.30-13.87). Considering all the cases, the secondary attack rate was 27.3 (95% CI 22.75-32.38). Risk factors were the gender and profession of the index case, the number of people living in the household, and the number of persons per bedroom. When the index case health worker used a single room, it had a protective effect, with an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.493 (95% CI 0.246-0.985); Conclusions: The secondary attack rate found among household contacts of health care workers is high. The preventive isolation of health care workers in individual rooms in their house may reduce the transmission in their families.

The Effects of COVID-19 on Healthcare Workers and Non-Healthcare Workers in Mexico: 14 Months into the Pandemic.

Background and Objectives: Healthcare workers (HCWs) play important roles in mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic and are more likely to become infected with COVID-19. Mexico, among other countries, had a high incidence and prevalence of cases and deaths from this disease. Material and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated the clinical characteristics as well as the geographical distribution of cases, deaths, and active cases of COVID-19 in HCWs and non-HCWs using official information from the Ministry of Health of Mexico. Results: A total of 235,343 cases of COVID-19 were reported in healthcare workers, and 2,094,191 cases were reported in non-healthcare workers. A total of 76.0% of cases in healthcare workers occurred in those who were between 25 and 50 years of age, and 71.4% of deaths occurred in those who were 50 to 69 years of age. Among healthcare workers, the most frequent comorbidities were obesity (15.2%), hypertension (10.9%), and diabetes (6.8%). Nurses were the group with the most cases (39.7%), followed by other healthcare workers (30.6%), physicians (26%), and dentists (1.6%). Physicians were the group with the most deaths (46%), followed by other professionals (30%), nurses (19%), and dentists (3%). Conclusion: These findings are likely the result of healthcare workers in Mexico being at a greater risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2.

188. Visualizing the Impact of a Wedding Leading to COVID-19 Outbreaks in Healthcare Settings, Washington State, July – August 2020

BackgroundLarge social gatherings during the COVID-19 pandemic have been linked to extensive community transmission. Healthcare workers (HCW) that engage in these social gatherings pose a risk to the vulnerable patients they serve. Public Health—Seattle & King County identified a COVID-19 outbreak associated with a wedding in July 2020 when the 14-day incidence rate was 105 cases per 100,000 residents. HCW who attended the wedding were subsequently linked to 45 outbreaks in healthcare settings across three counties in the next month.MethodsCOVID-19 case interview data was used to identify HCW cases who reported the wedding as their exposure event. The Washington Disease Reporting System (WDRS), the state database in which COVID-19 cases and epi-linkages are tracked, was queried to identify healthcare outbreaks linked to the HCW wedding-attendee cases and the HCW that they infected. NodeXL was used to visualize the resulting chains of wedding-associated healthcare transmission using a Harel-Koren Fast Multiscale layout where the network visualization’s directed arrows represent putative links and direction of transmission. Numbers of associated settings, cases, and deaths were calculated.ResultsSeven HCW wedding attendees were linked to outbreaks in healthcare facilities that they worked at while infectious; HCWs linked to as many as six subsequent healthcare outbreaks. In total, the wedding was connected to 45 healthcare facilities: adult family homes (N=1), hospitals (N=1), supported living agencies (N=7) and associated group homes (N=38), assisted living (N=1), home health services (N=1), behavioral health (N=2), and rehab centers (N=1). Across the settings, 277 cases were identified, including 15 deaths.ConclusionA series of COVID-19 healthcare outbreaks was traced back to a wedding. Cases worked in multiple homes, agencies, and other healthcare settings which likely facilitated rapid and wide transmission; the structure of these healthcare settings often do not facilitate a single job providing enough hours and income to support an individual. In terms of public health learnings, addressing these outbreaks require effective contact tracing, multijurisdictional coordination, and for supported living, interventions need to be applied across households sharing staff.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Sufficient personal protective equipment training can reduce COVID-19 related symptoms in healthcare workers: A prospective cohort study

BackgroundThe association between inadequate personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic and an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in frontline healthcare workers has been proven. However, frontline healthcare workers with an adequate supply of personal protective equipment still showed an increased risk of contracting COVID-19. Research on the use of personal protective equipment could provide insight into handling present and future pandemics. ObjectivesThis study aims to investigate the impact of the availability, training and correct selection of personal protective equipment on the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection or positive suspect cases in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium. DesignThis was a prospective cohort study involving Belgian healthcare workers: nurses, nursing aides, and midwives working in hospitals, home care services, and residential care services. MethodsRespondents were invited from May to July 2020 (period 1) followed by a second time in October 2020 (period 2) to complete a digital survey on personal protective equipment availability, training, personal protective equipment selection, screening ability, COVID-19 testing and status, and symptoms corresponding with the COVID-19 suspect case definition. The main outcome was a composite of COVID-19 status change (from negative to positive) during the study or a positive suspect case definition in period 2. ResultsFull data were available for 617 participants. The majority of respondents were nurses (93%) employed in a hospital (83%). In total, 379 respondents provided frontline care for COVID-19 patients (61%) and were questioned on personal protective equipment availability and personal protective equipment selection. Nurses were more likely to select the correct personal protective equipment compared with nursing aides and midwives. Respondents working in residential care settings were least likely to choose personal protective equipment correctly. Of all healthcare workers, 10% tested positive for COVID-19 during the course of the study and a composite outcome was reached in 54% of all respondents. Working experience and sufficient personal protective equipment training showed an inverse relation with the composite outcome. The relationship between personal protective equipment availability and the composite outcome was fully mediated by personal protective equipment training (-0.105 [95% confidence interval -0.211 — -0.020]). ConclusionsProper training in personal protective equipment usage is critical to reduce the risk of COVID infection in healthcare workers. During a pandemic, rapid dissemination of video guidelines could improve personal protective equipment knowledge in practitioners.Tweetable abstract: Proper training in personal protective equipment usage is critical to reduce the risk of COVID infection in healthcare workers.

Performance of hospital-based contact tracing for COVID-19 during Australia's second wave.

BackgroundHospital-based contact tracing aims to limit spread of COVID-19 within healthcare facilities. In large outbreaks, this can stretch resources and workforce due to quarantine of uninfected staff. We analysed the performance of a manual contact tracing system for healthcare workers (HCW) at a multi-site healthcare facility in Melbourne, Australia, from June–September 2020, during an epidemic of COVID-19.MethodsAll HCW close contacts were quarantined for 14 days, and tested around day 11, if not already diagnosed with COVID-19. We examined the prevalence and timing of symptoms in cases detected during quarantine, described this group as proportions of all close contacts and of all cases, and used logistic regression to assess factors associated with infection.ResultsCOVID-19 was diagnosed during quarantine in 52 furloughed HCWs, from 483 quarantine episodes (11%), accounting for 19% (52/270) of total HCW cases. In 361 exposures to a clear index case, odds of infection were higher after contact with an infectious patient compared to an infectious HCW (aOR: 4.69, 95% CI: 1.98–12.14). Contact with cases outside the workplace increased odds of infection compared to workplace contact only (aOR: 7.70, 95% CI: 2.63–23.05). We estimated 30%, 78% and 95% of symptomatic cases would develop symptoms by days 3, 7, and 11 of quarantine, respectively.ConclusionIn our setting, hospital-based contact tracing detected and contained a significant proportion of HCW cases, without excessive quarantine of uninfected staff. Effectiveness of contact tracing is determined by a range of dynamic factors, so system performance should be monitored in real-time.

Explosive nosocomial outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in a rehabilitation clinic: the limits of genomics for outbreak reconstruction

BackgroundNosocomial outbreaks of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) are frequent despite implementation of conventional infection control measures. An outbreak investigation was undertaken using advanced genomic and statistical techniques to reconstruct likely transmission chains and assess the role of healthcare workers (HCWs) in SARS-CoV-2 transmission.MethodsA nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in a university-affiliated rehabilitation clinic was investigated, involving patients and HCWs, with high coverage of pathogen whole-genome sequences (WGS). The time-varying reproduction number from epidemiological data (Rt) was estimated, and maximum likelihood phylogeny was used to assess genetic diversity of the pathogen. Genomic and epidemiological data were combined into a Bayesian framework to model the directionality of transmission, and a case–control study was performed to investigate risk factors for nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 acquisition in patients.FindingsThe outbreak lasted from 14th March to 12th April 2020, and involved 37 patients (31 with WGS) and 39 employees (31 with WGS), 37 of whom were HCWs. Peak Rt was estimated to be between 2.2 and 3.6. The phylogenetic tree showed very limited genetic diversity, with 60 of 62 (96.7%) isolates forming one large cluster of identical genomes. Despite the resulting uncertainty in reconstructed transmission events, the analyses suggest that HCWs (one of whom was the index case) played an essential role in cross-transmission, with a significantly greater fraction of infections (P<2.2e-16) attributable to HCWs (70.7%) than expected given the number of HCW cases (46.7%). The excess of transmission from HCWs was higher when considering infection of patients [79.0%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 78.5–79.5%] and frail patients (Clinical Frailty Scale score >5; 82.3%; 95% CI 81.8–83.4%). Furthermore, frail patients were found to be at greater risk for nosocomial COVID-19 than other patients (adjusted odds ratio 6.94, 95% CI 2.13–22.57).InterpretationThis outbreak report highlights the essential role of HCWs in SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics in healthcare settings. Limited genetic diversity in pathogen genomes hampered the reconstruction of individual transmission events, resulting in substantial uncertainty in who infected whom. However, this study shows that despite such uncertainty, significant transmission patterns can be observed.