Health Care Expenditures For Patients Research Articles

Impact of a clinical pharmacist-led, artificial intelligence–supported medication adherence program on medication adherence performance, chronic disease control measures, and cost savings

BackgroundChronic diseases are the leading cause of disability and death in the United States. Clinical pharmacists have been shown to optimize health outcomes and reduce health care expenditures in patients with chronic diseases through improving medication adherence. ObjectiveThe primary objective of this study was to evaluate a pharmacist-led, artificial intelligence (AI)–supported medication adherence program on medication adherence, select disease control measures, and health care expenditures. MethodsThis was a multicenter, retrospective, quasi-experimental evaluation from January 2019 to December 2019 (preimplementation) and January 2021 to December 2021 (postimplementation). This pharmacy-driven service focuses on improving medication adherence and patient outcomes through AI-supported analytics, individual patient case review, and pharmacist-led individual patient outreach. The primary end point was to determine whether implementation improved medication adherence in 3 medication-related measures: medication adherence for hypertension (MAH), medication adherence for cholesterol (MAC), and medication adherence for diabetes (MAD). Secondary outcomes were to evaluate reductions in select chronic diseases control measures and cost savings of this service after implementation of this service. ResultsThis medication adherence service was deployed across 10,477 patients: 60.6% of patients were in at least 1 medication-related measure, generating 2762 actionable medication adherence gaps. After the implementation of this pharmacist-led program, medication adherence improved in all 3 disease state measures (MAH 5.9% improvement, MAC 7.9% improvement, MAD, 6.4% improvement), and Medicare Star ratings also improved. The percentage of patients with diabetes who reached their A1c goal also increased (75.5%-81.7%). Furthermore, reductions in overall health care expenditures were seen per member per month in patients who were adherent in comparison with those who were nonadherent (hypertension 31% cost savings, hyperlipidemia 25% cost savings, diabetes 32% cost savings). ConclusionThis clinical pharmacist–driven service leveraged technology and patient connection to increase medication adherence in patients with chronic disease states and led to improvement in select disease control measures and substantial health care cost savings.

A Scoping Review of the Clinical Utility of Laparoscopic Vasectomy.

Vasectomy is a common procedure performed for family planning. Traditionally, this has been via a scrotal approach. In contrast, laparoscopic vasectomy is a documented but rarely described procedure that may minimise anaesthetic risk, surgical risk, and healthcare expenditure in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic procedures for concurrent pathology such as hernia repair. This scoping review evaluates the clinical utility of laparoscopic vasectomy. It was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Articles were identified with keywords related to laparoscopy and vasectomy. Six peer-reviewed, full-text articles published in English were included in this review. These studies encompass eight individual patient cases of laparoscopic vasectomy performed in the 1990s and early 2000s. All the cases included laparoscopy for concurrent pathology, the most common of which was inguinal hernia. There were no complications associated with laparoscopic vasectomy. For patients requiring laparoscopic surgery for alternate pathologies, synchronous laparoscopic vasectomy improves surgical efficiency by minimising anaesthetic time, operative time, and risk, in addition to lower associated healthcare costs. However, consideration is given to the limitations of this approach, and a note is made of the lack of evidence regarding safety and efficacy given the paucity of cases described in the literature.

Health Care Expenditure of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Bangladesh: A Review

The main objectives of this review are to offer an in-depth examination of the analysis of health care expenditure of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in covering its epidemiology, causes, clinical manifestations, diagnostic techniques, treatment approaches, and prognosis in Bangladesh. Most of the information and data are mainly involved in a critical review of various studies from sample groups of different ethnicities, age groups and genders. This study employs a systematic review and meta-analysis approach to compile and analyze existing research on health care expenditure of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The study follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to ensure comprehensive and transparent reporting of the review process. Results on the basis of various reports showed that the length of diabetes and the number of co-morbidities and complications raise the cost of healthcare. The data confirms the previously reported conclusion that patients treated with insulin monotherapy or an insulin and oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) combination had higher direct costs and overall costs than patients treated with OHAs alone. Overall, it was discovered that the main contributing factors to the cost of therapy were the length of diabetes, the quantity of co-morbidities and complications, and the type of treatment. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is increasing in Bangladesh, where out-of-pocket medical expenses are higher and universal health insurance is not available to the general public. Planning cost-effective diabetes management and prevention measures is necessary. A suitable insurance plan should be created with special services for diabetic patients. To reduce the negative effects of the condition, early detection of diabetes is essential as reported by several studies compiled herein. This can be accomplished through raising awareness and eradicating the social stigma, especially for women in Bangladesh. J. Bio-Sci. 32(2): 93-106, 2024

Understanding racial disparities in health care expenditures for cervical cancer.

Cervical cancer demonstrates a notable efficacy in treatment, evidenced by a 92% 5-year survival rate among cases diagnosed at a localized stage. In 2020, the estimated annual national expenditure for cervical cancer care amounted to $2.3 billion in the United States. Limited real-world data are available for racial disparities in health care expenditures for cervical cancer. To evaluate racial disparities associated with annual health care expenditures among patients diagnosed with cervical cancer in the United States. A retrospective observational cohort study of annual health care expenditures in patients with cervical cancer diagnosed during 2014-2019 was performed using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data. In addition to the descriptive weighted analysis, an unadjusted analysis of the annual health care expenditure was conducted. An adjusted linear regression model with log transformation of the outcome variable was used to evaluate the total annual health care expenditure as well as expenditures by category across the racial groups. Overall, 826 patients with cervical cancer were identified from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey during 2014-2019. The majority were classified as White patients (81.2%) and in the age group of 45-64 years (44.65%). On average, the total annual health care expenditure was $11,537 (95% CI = $9,887-$13,186) among the White cohort, $10,659 (95% CI = $6,704-$14,614) among the African American cohort, and $8,726 (95% CI = $6,113-$11,340) among the Hispanic cohort. After adjusting for covariates, the average total annual health care expenditure for the Hispanic cohort was 35% of the total health care expenditure of the White cohort (P < 0.001) and 46% of the African American cohort's health care expenditure (P = 0.02). Specifically, adjusted costs of office-based and outpatient visits for the Hispanic cohort were 47% (P = 0.009) and 57% (P = 0.005) lower than for the White cohort, respectively. The total annual home health care expenditure for the African American cohort was 49% lower than White patients (P = 0.03), and the Hispanic cohort's total expenditure, excluding prescription medicines, was 57% lower than African American patients (P = 0.02). This study provides valuable information regarding the health care disparities that need to be addressed among certain minority races. Reducing the disparities in health care spending across racial groups should be included as a crucial element in tackling well-established health care inequities.

Does the introduction of an infliximab biosimilar always result in savings for hospitals? A descriptive study using real-world data

BackgroundBiosimilars are biologic drugs that have the potential to increase the efficiency of healthcare spending and curb drug-related cost increases. However, their introduction into hospital formularies through initiatives such as non-medical switching must be carefully orchestrated so as not to cause treatment discontinuation or result in increased health resource utilization, such as additional visits or laboratory tests, among others. This retrospective cohort study aims to assess the impact of the introduction of CT-P13 on the healthcare expenditures of patients who were treated with originator infliximab or CT-P13.MethodsGastroenterology, immunoallergology and rheumatology patients treated between September 2017 and December 2020 at a university hospital in Western Switzerland were included and divided into seven cohorts, based on their treatment pathway (i.e., use and discontinuation of CT-P13 and/or originator infliximab). Costs in Swiss francs were obtained from the hospital's cost accounting department and length of stay was extracted from inpatient records. Comparisons of costs and length of stay between cohorts were calculated by bootstrapping.ResultsSixty immunoallergology, 84 rheumatology and 114 gastroenterology patients were included. Inpatient and outpatient costs averaged (sd) CHF 1,611 (1,020) per hospital day and CHF 4,991 (6,931) per infusion, respectively. The mean (sd) length of stay was 20 (28) days. Although immunoallergology and rheumatology patients had higher average costs than gastroenterology patients, differences in costs and length of stay were not formally explained by treatment pathway. Differences in health resource utilization were marginal.ConclusionsThe introduction of CT-P13 and the disruption of patient treatment management were not associated with differences in average outpatient and inpatient costs and length of stay, in contrast to the results reported in the rest of the literature. Future research should focus on the cost-effectiveness of non-medical switching policies and the potential benefits for patients.

Incidence, prevalence and characteristics of multimorbidity in different age groups among urban hospitalized patients in China

The aim of the study was to investigate the incidence, prevalence and characteristics of multimorbidity in urban inpatients of different age groups. This study used data from the National Insurance Claim for Epidemiology Research (NICER) to calculate the overall incidence, prevalence, geographic and age distribution patterns, health care burden, and multimorbidity patterns for multimorbidity in 2017. According to our study, the overall prevalence of multimorbidity was 6.68%, and the overall prevalence was 14.87% in 2017. The prevalence of multimorbidity increases with age. The pattern of the geographic distribution of multimorbidity shows that the prevalence of multimorbidity is relatively high in South East China. The average annual health care expenditure of patients with multimorbidity increased with age and rose rapidly, especially among older patients. Patients with cancer and chronic kidney disease have higher treatment costs. Patients with hypertension or ischemic heart disease had a significantly higher relative risk of multimorbidity than other included noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). Hyperlipidemia has generated the highest number of association rules, which may suggest that hyperlipidemia may be both a risk factor for other NCDs and an outcome of them.

Using Sacubitril/Valsartan to Decrease Health care Costs in Population Health Patients

Value-based care is the foundation of population health. The Health care Economic Efficiency Ratio (HEERO) scoring system is a promising new tool to measure the cost benefits of care in our Accountable Care Organization. HEERO score compares actual costs spent (utilizing insurance claims) and expected costs spent (estimated using the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services Risk score). Scores <1 suggest economic benefit. Sacubitril/valsartan has been shown to decrease readmissions for patients with heart failure (HF) and decrease health care costs. We explored the utility of sacubitril/valsartan in reducing HEERO scores and decreasing overall health care expenditure in patients with HF. Patients with HF in the population health cohort were enrolled. HEERO score was calculated for patients taking sacubitril/valsartan and other HF medications at 3-month intervals up to a year. We compared the average and total health care expenditure and inpatient days for patients on sacubitril/valsartan, spironolactone, β blocker (BB) along with spironolactone, BB and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker. For patients on sacubitril/valsartan, HEERO scores and inpatient days decreased (decreased health care expenditure) as the number of days of utilization increased (p<0.0001). In total, 270+ days of sacubitril/valsartan decreased health care costs by 22%. This cost reduction was mainly attributed to decreased inpatient days. Additionally, the combination of sacubitril/valsartan, spironolactone, and BB showed decreased HEERO score and inpatient days compared with spironolactone, BB and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker in male patients. Sacubitril/valsartan use beyond 270days resulted in decreased health care expenditure in a population health cohort compared with other HF medications. This economic benefit is achieved through the reduction in hospitalizations. Sacubitril/valsartan is an integral part of value-based care providing high-value, cost-effective care, and bolstering the economic wellbeing of patient care. Payor sources should consider this in subsidizing the cost of the medicine.

Addressing Healthcare Utilization and Costs for Older Adults with Limited Mobility Through a Multidisciplinary Home-Based Primary Care Program.

Home-based primary care (HBPC) has shown promise in the management of multiple chronic conditions for patients who are homebound or who have limited mobility. The objective of this study was to implement and evaluate an HBPC program that integrates the services of clinical pharmacists and community aging services providers in a community-based setting. Mountain Area Health Education Center's (MAHEC) HBPC program brought together an interdisciplinary team including medical providers, pharmacists, and community aging services providers to conduct home visits with older adults (age 50+). A single-arm, prepost analysis was conducted to determine differences from the year before program enrollment to the year postenrollment. We examined the frequency of health care visits, high-cost health care utilization (emergency department [ED] utilization and hospitalizations), and health care costs. Descriptive statistics characterized the study population and outcomes. Fisher's Exact Tests were used to determine if there was a significant difference between years. There were 130 home visits with 62 patients enrolled in the program. The Medicare Annual Wellness Visit (AWV) was completed for 32 (51.6%) patients. There were 13 (21.0%) and 12 (19.4%) individuals who had at least 1 ED visit and hospitalization, respectively, pre-enrollment as compared with 8 (12.9%) and 9 (14.5%) individuals postenrollment (p-value = 0.05, p-value = 0.06). During the postenrollment year, patient enrollees had an average per-member-per-month (PMPM) cost of $1567.96 as compared with $3053.21 in the year prior. Pharmacist and community agency services-integrated HBPC was implemented in the community setting. There was a decrease in high-cost health care utilization and total health care expenditures for patients as compared with the previous year.

EE121 Marginal Health Care Expenditure of Patients with Viral Hepatitis in the US: Analysis of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2011-2020

Viral hepatitis is a serious public health problem due to the significant healthcare consequences of hepatitis-C (HCV) and hepatitis-B (HBV) in the United States. Since 2009, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a new class of drugs for HCV and two new molecules for HBV. However, limited healthcare burden evidence exists for viral-hepatitis after the introduction of new drugs. Therefore, this study evaluated the marginal healthcare expenditures for viral-hepatitis using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).

Economic burden of nonadherence to standards of diabetes care.

To evaluate the effect of nonadherence to American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines on health care expenditures for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Retrospective cross-sectional cohort design, utilizing 2016-2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data. Patients with a diagnosis of T2D who completed the supplemental T2D care survey were included in the study. Participants were categorized based on adherence to the 10 processes in the ADA guidelines into adherent (≥ 9 processes) and nonadherent (≤ 6 processes) categories. Propensity score matching was employed using a logistic regression model. After matching, total annual health care expenditure change from baseline year was compared using a t test. Further, imbalanced variables were controlled for in a multivariable linear regression model. A total of 1619 patients representing 15,781,346 (SE = 438,832) individuals met the inclusion criteria, among whom 12.17% received nonadherent care. After propensity matching, those who received nonadherent care had $4031 higher total annual health care expenditures compared with their baseline year, whereas patients who received adherent care had $128 lower total annual health care expenditures compared with their baseline year. Further, multivariable linear regression adjusted for the imbalanced variables indicated that nonadherent care was associated with a mean (SE) $3470 ($1588) increase in the change from baseline health care expenditure. Nonadherence to the ADA guidelines results in a significant increase in health care expenditures among patients with diabetes. The economic impact of nonadherent care for T2D is a significant and extensive issue that needs to be addressed. These findings emphasize the importance of providing care based on ADA guidelines.

Costs During the Last Five Years of Life for Patients with Clinical and Pathological Confirmed Diagnosis of Lewy Body Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease.

Little is known regarding healthcare expenditures for patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) during the end of life. This study estimated Medicare expenditures during the last 5 years of life in a decedent sample of patients who were clinically diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease (AD) or DLB and had autopsy confirmed diagnosis. The study included 58 participants clinically diagnosed with mild dementia at study entry (AD: n = 44, DLB: n = 14) and also had autopsy-confirmed diagnoses of pure AD (n = 32), mixed AD+Lewy body (LB) (n = 5), or pure LB (n = 11). Total Medicare expenditures were compared by clinical and pathology confirmed diagnosis, adjusting for sex, age at death, and patient's cognition, function, comorbidities, and psychiatric and extrapyramidal symptoms. When pathology diagnoses were not considered, predicted annualized total Medicare expenditures during the last 5 years of life were similar between clinically diagnosed AD ($7,465±1,098) and DLB ($7,783±1,803). When clinical diagnoses were not considered, predicted expenditures were substantially higher in patients with pathology confirmed mixed AD+LB ($12,005±2,455) than either pure AD ($6,173±941) or pure LB ($4,629±1,968) cases. Considering clinical and pathology diagnosis together, expenditures for patients with clinical DLB and pathology mixed AD+LB ($23,592±3,679) dwarfed other groups. Medicare expenditures during the last 5 years of life were substantially higher in patients with mixed AD+LB pathology compared to those with pure-AD and pure-LB pathologies, particularly in those clinically diagnosed with DLB. Results highlight the importance of having both clinical and pathology diagnoses in examining healthcare costs.

EE232 A Real-World (RW) Comparison of Healthcare Expenditures in Patients Prescribed Aripiprazole Tablet with Sensor (AS) and Patients Prescribed Aripiprazole Alone [Aripiprazole without Sensor (ARI)] in the US

Indicated for treatment of adults with bipolar I disorder (BP1), schizophrenia (SCZ) and major depressive disorder (MDD), AS is a drug-device system comprised of aripiprazole tablets embedded with an Ingestible Event Marker tracking drug ingestion, mood, rest and physical activity. This study compares healthcare expenditures in patients prescribed AS versus a matched ari only cohort.

EE156 Marginal Health Care Expenditure of Patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: 2014-2019

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is one of the most common cancers in the United States, accounting for about 4% of all cancers. This study evaluated the marginal health care expenditures among individuals with NHL using Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).

Machine Learning Patient-Specific Prediction of Heart Failure Hospitalization Using Cardiac MRI-Based Phenotype and Electronic Health Information.

BackgroundHeart failure (HF) hospitalization is a dominant contributor of morbidity and healthcare expenditures in patients with systolic HF. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is increasingly employed for the evaluation of HF given capacity to provide highly reproducible phenotypic markers of disease. The combined value of CMR phenotypic markers and patient health information to deliver predictions of future HF events has not been explored. We sought to develop and validate a novel risk model for the patient-specific prediction of time to HF hospitalization using routinely reported CMR variables, patient-reported health status, and electronic health information.MethodsStandardized data capture was performed for 1,775 consecutive patients with chronic systolic HF referred for CMR imaging. Patient demographics, symptoms, Health-related Quality of Life, pharmacy, and routinely reported CMR features were provided to both machine learning (ML) and competing risk Fine-Gray-based models (FGM) for the prediction of time to HF hospitalization.ResultsThe mean age was 59 years with a mean LVEF of 36 ± 11%. The population was evenly distributed between ischemic (52%) and idiopathic non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (48%). Over a median follow-up of 2.79 years (IQR: 1.59–4.04) 333 patients (19%) experienced HF related hospitalization. Both ML and competing risk FGM based models achieved robust performance for the prediction of time to HF hospitalization. Respective 90-day, 1 and 2-year AUC values were 0.87, 0.83, and 0.80 for the ML model, and 0.89, 0.84, and 0.80 for the competing risk FGM-based model in a holdout validation cohort. Patients classified as high-risk by the ML model experienced a 34-fold higher occurrence of HF hospitalization at 90 days vs. the low-risk group.ConclusionIn this study we demonstrated capacity for routinely reported CMR phenotypic markers and patient health information to be combined for the delivery of patient-specific predictions of time to HF hospitalization. This work supports an evolving migration toward multi-domain data collection for the delivery of personalized risk prediction at time of diagnostic imaging.

The effect of frailty on post-operative outcomes and health care expenditures in patients treated with partial nephrectomy

ObjectiveTo examine the effect of frailty on short-term post-operative outcomes and total hospital charges (THCs) in patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma, treated with partial nephrectomy (PN). MethodsWithin the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database we identified 25,545 patients treated with PN from 2000 to 2015. We used the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACG) frailty-defining indicator and we examined the rates of frailty over time, as well as its effect on overall complications, major complications, blood transfusions, non-home-based discharge, length of stay (LOS) and THCs. Time trends and multivariable logistic, Poisson and linear regression models were applied. ResultsOverall, 3574 (14.0%) patients were frail, 2677 (10.5%) were older than 75 years and 2888 (11.3%) had Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥ 2. However, the vast majority of frail patients were neither elderly nor comorbid (83%). Rates of frail patients treated with PN increased over time, from 8.3 in 2000 to 18.1% in 2015 (all p < 0.001). Frail patients showed higher rates of overall complications (43.5 vs. 30.3%), major complications (16.6 vs. 9.8%), blood transfusions (11.6 vs 8.3%) and non-home-based discharge (9.9 vs. 5.4%). longer LOS [4 (IQR: 3–6) vs. 4 (IQR: 2–5) days] and higher THCs ($43,906 vs. $38,447 – all p < 0.001). Moreover, frailty status independently predicted overall complications (OR: 1.73), major complications (OR: 1.63), longer LOS (RR: 1.07) and higher THCs (RR: +$7506). Finally, a dose-response on the risk of suboptimal surgical outcomes was shown in patients with multiple risk factors. ConclusionsOne out of seven patients is frail at time of surgery and this rate is on the rise. Moreover, frailty is associated with adverse outcomes after PN. In consequence, preoperative assessment of frailty status should be implemented, to identify patients who may benefit from pre- or postoperative measures aimed at improving surgical outcomes in this patient population.

Vasopressin in Conjunction With Norepinephrine in Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study From a Low Middle-Income Country.

Objectives:Guidelines recommend use of norepinephrine as the first-line treatment for fluid-refractory septic shock and if septic shock persists vasopressin may be initiated. Since there are limited data from low middle-income countries with high disease burden of sepsis, we aimed to compare the outcomes of using vasopressin adjunct to norepinephrine in comparison with norepinephrine alone.Design:Retrospective cohort study.Setting:Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.Patients:Six-hundred fifty-three patients diagnosed with septic shock from January 2019 to December 2019, with 498 given norepinephrine only and 155 given norepinephrine-vasopressin combination.Interventions:None.Measurements and Main Results:Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were duration of vasopressor used, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, and days on ventilatory support. After adjustment by multivariable logistic regression, it was found that mortality was not significantly associated with the norepinephrine-vasopressin combination (adjusted odds ratio, 0.633 [95% CI, 0.370–1.081]). However, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at admission (1.100 [1.014–1.193]), lactate at admission (1.167 [1.109–1.227]), duration of vasopressor used (1.481 [1.316–1.666]), and level of care (3.025 [1.682–5.441]) were found to be independently associated with the adjunct usage of norepinephrine and vasopressin.Conclusions:The use of norepinephrine-vasopressin combination has remained debatable in literature. Our study showed that although there was no difference in mortality between the two groups, admission Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores and admission lactate levels were found to be significantly higher in the norepinephrine-vasopressin group. Hence, physicians from Pakistan used the norepinephrine-vasopressin combination in resistant septic shock patients who were sicker to begin with. Furthermore, duration of vasopressor therapy and ICU admission were also significantly higher in the combination group. Considering the recent hyperinflation of vasopressors costs and that most healthcare expenditure for patients in Pakistan is out-of-pocket, this can consequently lead to unwarranted financial burden for patients and their families.

36,269 patients with chronic cardiovascular, metabolic and renal conditions: impact on clinical outcomes, medical resource use and health-related costs of deranged serum potassium levels

Abstract Background Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) and its risk factors at stage A of the disease are conditions that trends to facilitate potassium (K+) derangements, for pathophysiology mechanisms and medication use than could facilitate both hyper- and hypokalamia. Studies on the associations between potassium derangements and clinical outcomes in these patient populations have yielded mixed findings, and the implications for healthcare expenditure are unknown. Purpose The objectives of our analysis was to asses the population-based associations between hyperkalemia, hypokalemia (compared to normokalemia) and all-cause death, urgent hospitalization, emergency department visits, daycare visits, and a yearly healthcare expenditure &amp;gt;85th percentile, in patients with chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension and ischemic heart disease. Methods Population-based, longitudinal study including up to 36,269 patients from the Public Healthcare Area with at least one of those conditions. We used three linked administrative, hospital and primary care healthcare databases with exhaustive information on sociodemographics, medical diagnoses, pharmacy dispensing and laboratory data. Participants were identified and followed between 2015 and 2017, had to be ≥55 years old and have at least one serum potassium measurement recorded; and were classified as hyperkalemic, hypokalemic or normokalemic. Four analytic designs were used to evaluate prevalent and incident disease cases as well as prevalent and incident use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors Results The majority of study participants remained normokalemic during the 3 months following study entry (ranging 94%–96%) and hyperkalemia was twice as frequent as hypokalemia. In all analyses, compared to normokalemic patients those with hyperkalemia had a worse crude event-free survival for all endpoints, and the worst survival was observed for hypokalemic patients [see Figure 1: prevalent case analysis; Kaplan-Meier cumulative survivor function curves for all-cause death (upper left), hospitalization (upper right), ED visits (lower left) and daycare visits (lower right)]. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, hyperkalemia was robustly and significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause death (hazard ratios from Cox regression models ranging 1.31–1.68) and with an increased odds of a yearly healthcare expenditure &amp;gt;85th percentile (odds ratios 1.21–1.29). Associations were even stronger in hypokalemic patients (hazard ratios for all-cause death 1.92–2.60; odds ratios for healthcare expenditure &amp;gt;percentile 85th 1.81–1.85). Conclusions Experimental studies are needed to confirm whether prevention of potassium derangements reduces mortality and healthcare expenditure in patients with these chronic conditions. Until then, our findings provide further observational evidence on the potential importance of maintaining normal potassium levels in this setting. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): The present study was funded by an unrestricted research grant from Vifor Pharma.

Marginal Health Care Expenditure Burden Among U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis: 2010-2015.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neuroinflammatory disorder with significant health care burden. However, little is known about health care expenditures since the introduction of oral agents for MS after 2010. To analyze health care expenditures in individuals with MS using Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data from 2010-2015. This retrospective cross-sectional study included adults (≥ 18 years) with MS (Clinical Classification Code 080) and those without MS based on the 2010-2015 full year consolidated MEPS Household Component and Medical Provider Component data files. Descriptive weighted analyses were performed to compare health care expenditures between individuals with MS and without MS. The 2-part model involving probit and generalized linear models was used to estimate the marginal increase in total health care expenditures for MS patients. There were 0.61 million patients (95% CI = 0.50-0.72) diagnosed with MS annually, accounting for a prevalence of 0.25%. The 2-part model revealed that the marginal total health care expenditures in patients diagnosed with MS were $20,103.49 (95% CI = $14,516.24-$25,690.73) more compared with those without MS. Further, the mean adjusted prescription medication expenditures for the MS group were $13,092.16 (95% CI = $9,452.20-$16,732.12) higher than the non-MS group and accounted for 65.12% of total health care expenditures in MS. MS is an expensive neuroinflammatory disease with a majority of the burden attributable to prescription medications. High prescription expenditure burden can be a barrier to optimal patient care in MS. No funding was received for this study. Hutton reports grants from Adamas, Biogen, EMD Serono, Genzyme, Hoffman-LaRoche, MedImmune, Mallinckrodt, and Novartis and fees from Biogen, Celgene, Genzyme, Genentech, and Novartis, outside the submitted work. Aparasu reports grants from Novartis, Incyte, and Astellas, outside the submitted work. Earla and Thornton have nothing to disclose. Part of the study findings was presented at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) 2019 National Conference; May 18-22, 2019; New Orleans, LA.

Factors associated with the healthcare expenditures of patients with multiple sclerosis in urban areas of China estimated by a generalized estimating equation

ABSTRACT Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) has a significant healthcare burden. This study examined the medical cost and out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses, and quantified the impact factors contributing to the costs. Methods: This is a retrospective study in 77 Chinese urban cites from 2013 to 2015. The data included the details of the utilization of medical resources, cost, and reimbursement ratio of all patients with a diagnosis of MS. A generalized estimating equation model was used to estimate the factors influencing the direct medical cost and OOP expenses for in- and outpatients. Results: A total of 267 patients with MS were identified. The mean cost per in- and outpatient was respectively 16996.2 and 2294.2 renminbi ($2768.12 and $373.65, €2087.16 and €281.73). Approximately 27% of the expenses were paid by the patients OOP. Factors contributing to high cost and high OOP expenses for inpatients were tertiary hospital admission, length of stay and residence in the east regions of China. Females and outpatients with resident insurance paid more OOP. Conclusion: This study illustrates the medical costs and burden of MS in Chinese patients and provides real-world data on MS that are essential for the improvement of health policies.

Diferencias en la hospitalización por causas infecciosas entre pacientes con hemodiálisis y diálisis peritoneal

Introducción: Aproximadamente el 50% del gasto anual en salud de los pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica en diálisis está relacionada con hospitalizaciones; las causas infecciosas representan la segunda causa de consulta con una alta morbilidad y mortalidad. No existen estudios donde se compare el tiempo de hospitalización por causas infecciosas entre las diferentes opciones de diálisis. Objetivo: Determinar las diferencias en tiempos de hospitalización que se deriva del manejo de patologías infecciosas en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica en diálisis, comparando los pacientes que se encuentran en hemodiálisis vs diálisis peritoneal. Materiales y métodos: Estudio de cohorte retrospectiva, dinámica, de pacientes en hemodiálisis y diálisis peritoneal que ingresan al servicio de urgencias del Hospital Universitario Mayor por patologías infecciosas. Los pacientes que ingresaron al estudio se incluyeron por métodos no probabilísticos. El cálculo de tamaño de muestra se realizó por comparación de medias. Para el análisis estadístico se incluyeron 172 pacientes en hemodiálisis y 85 en diálisis peritoneal. Resultados: El tiempo de hospitalización es mayor en pacientes con hemodiálisis en comparación con los pacientes en diálisis peritoneal, 12 (RIC 8-21) vs 10 (RIC 6,5-13) días respectivamente, p = 0,004. Conclusiones: El tiempo de hospitalización por causas infecciosas es mayor en los pacientes con hemodiálisis que los de diálisis peritoneal, adicionalmente la incidencia de infecciones asociadas a la terapia en nuestra población es menor que lo reportado a nivel mundial.