Behavioral Health Care Research Articles

Implementing and Evaluating a Pilot Interprofessional Training Program to Engage Health Care Teams in Cost of Care Conversations.

This study evaluated the impact of Financial and Insurance Navigation Assistance-Training - a pilot interprofessional training program to facilitate cost of care (CoC) conversations and address health-harming social determinants of health in a pediatric hematology-oncology clinic. A pre-post study design was used to evaluate the impact of Financial and Insurance Navigation Assistance-Training on an interprofessional health care team's (clinicians, social workers, financial navigator, and legal advocates) knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to CoC conversations and screening, referring, and collaborating with interprofessional team members. Data were collected via surveys administered at baseline/pretraining, immediate post-training, and 12-month post-training. Most health care team members (n= 21) reported improvement in their knowledge of available financial (66.7%) and legal resources (86.7%) and ability to address social needs (93.3%), financial needs (93.3%), and facilitate CoC conversations with patients and caregivers (66.7%). Improvements in attitudes and behaviors toward engaging in CoC conversations, screenings, and referrals were relatively improved as a result of the training. However, there was a lower positive rate for actual behaviors around routine screening and initiating discussions on out-of-pocket costs, suggesting a need to address barriers. Study findings highlight the importance of interprofessional education in helping health care teams address social determinants of health through effective CoC conversations.

Improving Behavioral Healthcare Access Disparities by Training Providers in Disadvantaged Communities - Evidence of Strategy Effectiveness.

Inadequate access to behavioral health services disproportionately impacts marginalized populations who live in disadvantaged areas. To reduce this gap, programs dedicated to optimizing behavioral health education and training must focus their efforts to enroll providers who practice in these disadvantaged areas. The Train New Trainers (TNT) fellowship program aims to enhance behavioral health knowledge, skills, and attitudes of primary care providers (PCPs) who deliver care in disadvantaged communities. We evaluate the effectiveness of the TNT recruitment strategy and the use of scholarships for targeting and recruiting PCPs who practice in disadvantaged communities. Observational study. TNT fellows from 2016 to 2023. State/federal classifications of medically underserved counties were used to establish scholarship criteria. Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was utilized to provide criterion validity for the use of state/federal criteria in the recruitment strategy, and to evaluate the effectiveness of the program in successfully recruiting PCPs practicing in disadvantaged communities. Practice location data were available for 347 fellows, 88.8% of whom received scholarships. Of the 347 practices, 300 (86.5%) primarily served communities meeting at least one state or federal criterion for medical shortage areas and/or underserved areas. According to ADI scores, 32.3% of practices served areas classified in the highest ADI (ADI decile 9 or 10), with a progressive increase in the proportion of fellows practicing in underserved areas each year; in 2023, 89.9% of practices met federal shortage criteria and 40.5% served areas with the highest deciles of ADI. The TNT program strategy for recruiting PCPs from high medical need geographical areas is associated with bringing primary care psychiatry education to areas considered underserved and disadvantaged. Equipping PCPs practicing in underserved areas with enhanced knowledge and skills in behavioral medicine has the potential to significantly improve the existing access gap in disadvantaged communities.

Evaluating the Implementation and Clinical Effectiveness of an Innovative Digital First Care Model for Behavioral Health Using the RE-AIM Framework: Quantitative Evaluation.

In the United States, innovation is needed to address the increasing need for mental health care services and widen the patient-to-provider ratio. Despite the benefits of digital mental health interventions (DMHIs), they have not been effective in addressing patients' behavioral health challenges as stand-alone treatments. This study evaluates the implementation and effectiveness of precision behavioral health (PBH), a digital-first behavioral health care model embedded within routine primary care that refers patients to an ecosystem of evidence-based DMHIs with strategically placed human support. Patient demographic information, triage visit outcomes, multidimensional patient-reported outcome measure, enrollment, and engagement with the DMHIs were analyzed using data from the electronic health record and vendor-reported data files. The RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework was used to evaluate the implementation and clinical effectiveness outcomes of PBH. PBH had a 47.58% reach rate, defined as patients accepting the PBH referral from their behavioral health integrated clinician. PBH patients had high DMHI registration rates (79.62%), high activation rates (76.54%), and high retention rates at 15 days (57.69%) and 30 days (44.58%) compared to literature benchmarks. In total, 74.01% (n=168) of patients showed clinical improvement, 22.47% (n=51) showed no clinical change, and 3.52% (n=8) showed clinical deterioration in symptoms. PBH had high adoption rates, with behavioral health integrated clinicians referring on average 4.35 (SD 0.46) patients to PBH per month and 90%-100% of clinicians (n=12) consistently referring at least 1 patient to PBH each month. A third (32%, n=1114) of patients were offered PBH as a treatment option during their triage visit. PBH as a care model with evidence-based DMHIs, human support for patients, and integration within routine settings offers a credible service to support patients with mild to moderate mental health challenges. This type of model has the potential to address real-life access to care problems faced by health care settings.

Sex differences in outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and epidemiological meta-analysis

Abstract Background Women are at higher risk of mortality from ST-elevation myocardial infarction (1) when compared to men. There is a lack of consensus among studies examining the effect of sex on outcomes from cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) (2-5). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to assess the relationship between outcomes of AMI-CS and sex. Purpose To examine sex-related differences in mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS). Methods Cochrane Central, PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched in February 2023 for studies reporting in-hospital or 30-day sex-specific mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock. Inclusion criteria consisted of observational or randomised controlled trials of adult patients with cardiogenic shock that reported unadjusted or adjusted (by odds or risk ratio) mortality rates by sex. In-hospital or 30-day mortality were treated as equivalent. Data were extracted for study size, number of men and women, unadjusted and adjusted mortality rates, and factors used in multivariable analysis. Studies were assessed for risk of bias and publication bias. Meta-analysis was performed using DerSimonian-Laird random effects model with inverse variant weighting, due to predicted high heterogeneity of included studies. Data are reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). P values were adjusted for multiple comparison using Holm-Bonferonni correction. The primary outcomes were unadjusted and adjusted sex-specific mortality rates due to AMI-cardiogenic shock. Results 4,286 studies were identified and 37 met inclusion criteria, pooling a total of 630,890 patients. Raw 30-day/in-hospital mortality of females with AMI-cardiogenic shock was 41.2% compared to 32.3% in males. Unadjusted OR for mortality in females was 1.42 (95% CI 1.31–1.55, p <0.001, t2 = 0.02, I2 = 70.3%), and the adjusted OR was 1.11 (95% CI 1.04–1.20, p <0.001, t2 = 0.01, I2 = 76.8%). Eight studies included data on use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), which was used in 31.2% of females compared to 39.9% of males. OR for use of MCS in females compared to males was 0.71 (95% CI 0.66–0.77, p < 0.001, t2 = 0.003, I2 = 35.2%). Conclusions Women with AMI-related cardiogenic shock are at greater risk of death compared to male patients and are less often treated with MCS. Potential explanations include residual confounding factors, differences in AMI-cardiogenic shock pathophysiology between men and women, and sex-related differences in healthcare behaviours, but we cannot exclude the effect of systemic bias on outcomes. Further research is required to address the causes of sex disparities in outcomes and ensure equitable management of AMI-cardiogenic shock in women.Unadjusted sex outcomes from AMI-CSAdjusted sex outcomes from AMI-CS

Community Health Worker Service: addressing the needs of Gypsy/Travellers in Scotland

Abstract Background Members of the Gypsy/Traveller community in the United Kingdom face significant health inequalities compared to the general population, including lower life expectancy, higher rates of morbidity and suicide and poorer infant and child outcomes. This study evaluated the implementation of community-based lay workers in Scotland - the Gypsy/Traveller Community Health Worker (CHW) service. Methods This multi-method qualitative study (December 2021 to August 2023) included 16 individual interviews, five focus groups, one workshop, two informal discussions, and one site visit. Participants were stakeholders, CHWs, and members of the Gypsy/Traveller community. Additionally, 116 documents were analysed. The framework method, Proctor’s implementation outcomes and thematic analysis were used for data analysis. Results CHWs reached approximately 1,000 individuals across six National Health Services (NHS) Boards. The implementation outcomes showed that the intervention was accepted and feasible. A third-sector organization (Black and Minority Ethnic Carers of People Project - MECOPP), played a crucial role in successfully delivering the CHW service. This innovative intervention employed members of the Gypsy/Traveller community as lay healthcare workers to break down barriers to accessing healthcare and other services (e.g., uptake of cervical screening, vaccination, housing, and sanitation). The CHWs were trusted, ensured healthcare information was culturally appropriate and successfully addressed discriminatory behaviours in health and social care. Limited resources pose challenges to the sustainability of the service. Conclusions The Gypsy/Traveller CHW service enhanced prevention, acted as a bridge between communities and health systems and addressed the wider determinants of health. The Gypsy/Traveller community still faces discriminatory, racist, and stigmatising behaviours, which further impede the quality, delivery, and accessibility of care. Key messages • The Community Health Worker service was acceptable and feasible in the Gypsy/Traveller community, acting as a bridge between community and health systems and increasing access to services. • Community Health Worker Service is an important strategy for delivering healthcare support through their sector organizations to address historical discrimination against minority ethnic groups.

Interprofessional Education Simulation Project Using the Collaborative Care Model.

Integrated behavioral health care (IBH), a team-based approach to care, involves behavioral health providers (BHP) to be utilized in primary care settings. Unfortunately, many BHP and primary care advanced practice nursing students do not receive IBH content in their educational curriculum. This article describes an innovative interprofessional simulation project (ISP) in a virtual IBH setting with primary care nurse practitioner and master's level counseling students. The ISP involved students role-playing using case studies while enacting the roles exemplified in the Collaborative Care model (CoCM). Interprofessional faculty collaborated in developing the project and training facilitators and interprofessional students. Of the students and faculty who completed a postsurvey, 87.7% reported an increase in preparedness in learning the CoCM, and 92.6% responded the preparation time for the project was "appropriate." The ISP project resulted in high satisfaction and perceived increased preparedness for students and faculty to practice and teach IBH. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.].

Quantifiable Cross-cultural Research on Medical Mistrust is Necessary for Effective and Equitable Vaccination in Low- and Middle-income Countries.

Perceptions of healthcare personnel and institutions substantially impact healthcare behaviors. In the US, minority experiences with racist events like the Tuskegee study, alongside everyday experiences of marginalization and discrimination, drive medical mistrust in populations that are already burdened with health inequalities. However, the concept of medical mistrust is rarely applied outside of industrialized contexts. Histories of colonialism, underfunded healthcare institutions, and the enormous cultural and ethnolinguistic diversity present in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) make medical mistrust a likely contributor to health behavior in these contexts. In the era of COVID-19 and emergent malaria vaccines, there is an urgent need to mitigate factors leading to medical mistrust, which impedes interest in novel vaccines. Doing so requires substantial investment in research that examines the causes of medical mistrust across diverse communities, develops methodological tools that can effectively measure medical mistrust across diverse cultural and ethno-linguistic contexts, and applies this data to policy and public health messaging. This commentary highlights the role of medical mistrust in vaccination and argues for its utility in addressing vaccine decision-making in LMICs.

Public and health care provider attitudes, understanding, and behaviors regarding emergency use authorizations: a scoping literature review

BackgroundUnder Sect. 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, when the US Department of Health and Human Services Secretary issues a declaration based on one of four types of determinations, FDA may authorize an unapproved product or unapproved uses of an approved product for emergency use. It is unclear how much the public and health care providers understand about emergency use authorizations and how that understanding influences perceptions or behavioral intentions. The current study aimed to explore consumer and health care provider perceptions of emergency use authorizations and how promotion of emergency use authorizations has been investigated in the literature.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review via PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL for original research published in English from January 1, 2012, through November 10, 2022. We conducted surveillance of the literature through March 2023.ResultsWe identified 13 studies reported in 14 publications that addressed public and health care provider attitudes, understanding, and behaviors with regard to products authorized under an emergency use authorization. We did not identify any articles describing research regarding the promotion of emergency use authorization products. Findings suggest gaps in understanding of emergency use authorizations, both for the public and health care providers. Findings also suggest the public and health care providers have concerns about safety or the lack of full FDA approval that may contribute to decreased willingness to receive treatments and vaccines under an emergency use authorization.ConclusionsFuture research should explore how emergency use authorizations have been promoted and how that promotion impacts public and health care provider perceptions.

Delays in bipolar depression treatment in primary care vs. integrated behavioral health and specialty care

IntroductionWhile bipolar disorder is not uncommon in primary care, collaborative care models for bipolar depression treatment are underdeveloped. Our aim was to compare initial pharmacological treatment patterns for an episode of bipolar depression in different care models, namely primary care (PC), integrated behavioral health (IBH), and mood specialty clinic (SC). MethodsA retrospective study of adults diagnosed with bipolar disorder who received outpatient care in 2020 was completed. Depressive episodes were captured based on DSM-5 criteria, ICD codes, or de novo emergent symptom burden (PHQ-9 ≥ 10). Pharmacological strategies were classified as 1) continuation of current regimen, 2) dose increase or 3) augmentation 4) switch to monotherapy or 5) a combination of more than two different strategies. Logistic regression was applied. ResultsA total of 217 encounters (PC = 32, IBH = 53, SC = 132) representing 186 unique patients were identified. PC was significantly more likely to continue the current regimen, while combination strategies were significantly more likely recommended in IBH and SC. Mood stabilizers were significantly more utilized in IBH and SC. There were no significant group differences in antidepressant use. LimitationsRetrospective study design at a single site. ConclusionsThis study provides evidence of delays in depression care in bipolar disorder. This is the first study to compare treatment recommendations for bipolar depression in different clinical settings. Future studies are encouraged to better understand this gap and to guide future clinical practice, regardless of care model, emphasizing the potential benefits of decision support tools and collaborative care models tailored for bipolar depression.

How to meet coping strategies and preferences of children during invasive medical procedures: perspectives of healthcare professionals

Children with negative procedural experiences have an increased risk of fear and distress, with psychological consequences for subsequent procedures and future healthcare behaviors. Gaining control and feeling trust are important aspects for children to decrease fear. To enable professionals providing personal care during medical procedures, a systematic, evidence-based approach that supports children in expressing their preferences is needed. This study will gain insight into the experiences and needs of professionals involved in small invasive medical procedures to meet the coping strategies and preferences of children undergoing these procedures. A qualitative design was used to gain insight into professionals’ perspectives. Data were collected through online focus groups with various professionals involved in medical procedures, such as anesthetists, laboratory staff, nurses, and pediatricians. Five interdisciplinary focus groups, with a total of 32 participants, were held. One overarching theme was revealed: “Balancing between different actors within the context of the hospital.” Professionals reported they had to deal with different actors during a medical procedure: the child, the parent, the colleague, and themselves. Each actor had its own interests. They were aware of the child and parents’ priority to gain control and feel trust. Nevertheless, they perceive organizational and personal aspects that hinder addressing these needs. Conclusion: To provide personalized care, professionals experience balancing between the needs and interests of diverse actors during medical procedures. The findings underscore the importance of a policy supporting HCPs in integrating patient-centered care into practice through practical tools and training initiatives such as scenario training.What is Known:• Unresolved pain and stress arising from medical procedures can have significant short- and long-term impacts on children. Empowering children to gain control and fostering a sense of trust are crucial factors in reducing fear associated with medical procedures.• Children and parents expect to receive child-tailored care from professionals including respect for their own, unique needs, and boundaries. Professionals should build trustful relationships and provide appropriately tailored autonomy around medical procedures.What is New:• Healthcare professionals vary in their awareness of children’s needs during a medical procedure. Beside this, the organizational dynamics of the hospital, along with the presence of actors such as the child, parent, colleague, and oneself, collectively influence the conduct of medical procedures.• Providing person-centered care during medical procedures can present challenges. The results highlight the significance of a policy to assist healthcare professionals in incorporating patient-centered care into their practice through practical tools and a culture of self-reflections regarding patient-centered values.

Development and Acceptability of Provider Training to Increase Treatment Engagement of Parents in Their Children's Behavioral Health Care Need.

BACKGROUND: Disruptive, Impulse-Control, and Conduct disorders (DIC) affect 5 million children in the United States and often require comprehensive and long-term behavioral health care for which sustained parental involvement is essential. Our research team is developing an intervention to improve parental engagement in the behavioral health care of their children with DIC. The intervention, which will be a modification of an evidence-based shared decision-making intervention called DECIDE, will include a parent component and a provider component. AIM: To determine the acceptability of the provider component of the modified DECIDE intervention. METHODS: The provider intervention is an asynchronous self-paced online training program made up of five modules: introduction, shared decision-making, perspective-taking, attributional errors, and being a responsive provider. The training was piloted with 41 providers in two public child and adolescent treatment programs. Following completion of the training, semi-structured interviews were conducted with the providers to assess the acceptability of the training. The interviews were analyzed with conventional content analysis. RESULTS: The provider training was well received by providers, and many had made practice changes based on what they had learned. Several offered recommendations for improvement, most notably the need to tailor the training based on provider role, discipline, and level of expertise. CONCLUSIONS: The feedback given by providers will be used to refine future iterations of the provider training component of the modified DECIDE intervention. Psychiatric nurses and other clinicians may draw from strategies incorporated in the training program to improve parent engagement in the treatment of children with DIC.

Influence of Health Insurance Financing on Economic Growth In Kenya

Economic growth positively impacts population health, providing access to quality healthcare, environmental protection, clean water, and better preventative behavior. However, Kenya's declining growth rate affects health financing, causing many citizens to struggle with access to care due to rising medical costs. This study sought to analyse the influence of health insurance financing on economic growth in kenya. The study was guided by the Solow-Swan Exogenous Growth Model. The study was conducted in Kenya. Data used in study was longitudinal data for twenty two years. The study period was from 2000 to 2022. A descriptive and inferential analysis performed where Auto-Regressive Distributive Lag (ARDL) model was used. Analyzed data were presented in the form of tables and discussions. The health insurance financing indicated a positive and statistically significant (b=0.2935; p = 0.0280.05), implying that one unit increase in health insurance financing could result in 0.2935 units in economic growth in Kenya. The study showed that adjusted R-squared was 0.9271, implying that the model explains approximately 92.71% of the variation in the economic growth in Kenya. The study concluded that, health insurance financing, is positively related to economic growth in the long run in Kenya. The study recommends that there is need for enhancing health insurance financing sources and gradually shifting towards sustainable domestic financing sources.

Preventive health-care behavior: a serial multiple mediation analysis

Purpose Preventive health-care behavior (PHB) adoption as a primordial prevention to stay healthy and avoid lifestyle disease risk is a global trend. This paper aims to use the PHB model and stimulus-organism-response theory to empirically examine the role of individual and technological factors in influencing primordial PHB. Design/methodology/approach A sequential mixed-method was adopted to identify the primordial PHB adoption and propose a conceptual framework. The identified determinants and the hypothesized relationships were empirically tested using a convenience sample of 406 urban Indians. Partial least square structural equation modeling is used for data analysis. Findings The derived conceptual framework was empirically tested to assess the role of health literacy (HL), health value (HV) and digital health information seeking (DHIS) on primordial PHB. Findings confirmed the significant influence of DHIS on HL, HL on HV and PHB and HV on PHB. The direct effects of DHIS on PHB and HV were insignificant. HL solely mediated the indirect effect of DHIS on PHB, while the mediation of HV was insignificant. HL and HV fully mediated the relationship between DHIS and PHB. Research limitations/implications The impact of DHIS on PHB adoption and the serial multiple mediating roles of HL and HV are significant in understanding primordial PHB adoption for both academic theory and practice. However, the cross-sectional study on urban Indians needs further validation across geographies. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this pioneering study is among the first to propose and validate a comprehensive model of primordial PHB adoption.

Theory-driven assessment of intentions and behaviours related to mobility of older inpatients: a survey of patients and healthcare professionals.

Low mobility of patients during hospitalisation is associated with adverse outcomes. To successfully change behaviours related to mobility of older hospitalised patients, we need to better understand the mechanisms underlying patient and healthcare professional behaviours. In this study, we thus assessed patient- and healthcare professional-reported intentions and behaviours related to mobility of older patients hospitalised on an acute medical ward, based on a theoretical framework - the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) model - and on additional barriers and facilitators to mobility. We conducted a cross-sectional survey in April 2022 among patients aged ≥60 years recently hospitalised on an an acute medical ward of one of three hospitals of different language/cultural regions of Switzerland, and healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses/nursing assistants, physiotherapists) working on those wards. The survey assessed the HAPA model and additional barriers and facilitators to patient mobility at hospital, as previously identified in the literature. The target behaviour studied was "to move as much as possible during hospitalisation" for patients and "to ensure my patients move as much as possible during hospitalisation" for healthcare professionals. We conducted hierarchical linear regressions to determine factors associated with the self-reported intention to perform the behaviour and with the self-reported behaviour itself. A total of 142 healthcare professionals (61 physicians, 59 nurses, 22 physiotherapists) and 200 patients (mean age 74 years) completed the survey. Patients with higher intention to move as much as possible during hospitalisation scored significantly higher on factual knowledge, outcome expectancies and risk perception. Healthcare professionals with higher intention to ensure that their patients move as much as possible during hospitalisation scored higher on action knowledge, outcome expectancies and risk perception. The more the patients reported that they moved as much as possible during hospitalisation, the higher their action knowledge and action control. The more healthcare professionals reported that they ensure that patients move as much as possible during hospitalisation, the higher they scored on factual knowledge, role perception, planning and action control. factual and action knowledge, self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, risk perception, planning and action control were identified as important drivers of patient- and healthcare professional-reported intentions and behaviours related to inpatient mobility. These parameters can be addressed through behaviour-change interventions and should be considered in future interventions to successfully implement practice changes, with the goal of improving mobility of older patients during hospitalisation, and thus the outcomes of this particularly vulnerable population.

Dissatisfaction with working conditions associated with lower vaccine confidence, commitment and behaviors among nurses: A large scale cross-sectional survey in France

BackgroundBefore, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic, doctor shortages led many countries to expand nurses' role in their mass vaccination programs. Nonetheless, nurses often express marked vaccine hesitancy. Simultaneously, their working conditions have been deteriorating. ObjectivesTo study 1) the association between nurses' perceptions of their working conditions and their vaccination-related behaviors (vaccination recommendations to their patients), and 2) the mediating role in this associations of their trust in health authorities, vaccine confidence, and vaccine proactive efficacy. DesignA cross-sectional survey. SettingsSalaried, community (self-employed) and mixed nurses in France. Participants18,888 nurses registered with the French national order of nurses (ONI, registration is mandatory) (N = 439,323). MethodsIn February 2023, this cross-sectional study used an online questionnaire to survey the nurses mandatorily registered with the French national order of nurses. Seven items adapted from models of psychosocial risk factors at work assessed their satisfaction with their working conditions. The international short version of the Pro-VC-Be (health professionals, vaccine confidence and behaviors) a validated instrument measuring psychosocial determinants of health-care professionals' vaccine behaviors) evaluated their vaccine-related attitudes and behaviors. Multiple group mediation analysis with structural equation modeling measured the associations between satisfaction at work, trust in health authorities, vaccine confidence, proactive efficacy (commitment and self-efficacy) in vaccination, and vaccination recommendations (against seasonal influenza for those with a chronic disease and against COVID-19 among adults). ResultsAmong the 18,888 participants, satisfaction at work had generally deteriorated, and only 47 % considered vaccines safe. Among salaried nurses (61 %), satisfaction at work was statistically significantly associated (p < 10−3) with trust in health authorities (β = 0.26 [0.24; 0.28]), vaccine confidence (total effect: β = 0.35 [0.31; 0.38]), proactive efficacy (total effect: β = 0.18 [0.16; 0.21]), and, to a smaller extent, with seasonal influenza and Covid-19 vaccine recommendations (total effect: β = 0.13 [0.09; 0.16]). Trust in health authorities played a statistically significant role (p < 10−3) mediating the associations of satisfaction at work with vaccine confidence and proactive efficacy. These three dimensions in turn mediated the relation between satisfaction at work and frequency of vaccination recommendations. These relations were similar among community nurses. ConclusionsSatisfaction at work appears to enhance nurses' vaccination attitudes and behaviors, which are likely to reinforce their capacity to promote their patients' vaccination. Significant improvement in their working conditions is needed to enable them to accomplish this role serenely.

Implementation Of New Mexico's 'No Behavioral Health Cost Sharing' Law: A Qualitative Study.

Out-of-pocket spending is a long-standing challenge for privately insured people. New Mexico passed the first US law prohibiting private insurers from applying cost sharing to behavioral health treatment, effective January1, 2022. We examined the perceptions of key informants, including clinicians, insurers, and state officials, about implementing the No Behavioral Health Cost Sharing law to explore how it might affect downstream outcomes such as spending and access. The law was viewed favorably and implemented without much difficulty. Clinicians noted widespread positive impacts, particularly for those needing intensive treatment. However, they worried about workforce capacity and the exclusion of people covered under self-insured employer plans, which are exempt from state regulation under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974. Insurers found the law to be in alignment with their organizational goals, but they expressed concern about the administrative burden caused by increased reviews of claims, and some were monitoring for unintended consequences (for example, waste and fraud) that could lead to increased premiums. Engagement strategies were needed to inform eligible members and facilitate enrollment in eligible plans. The law provides a potential model for states to improve access to behavioral health care, but impacts may be limited by factors such as workforce, awareness, and federal ERISA constraints.

Disparities in mental health screening for veteran women with a new diagnosis of breast cancer.

222 Background: Compared to the general population, mental health disorders, including depression, are higher for Veteran women. Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in this population and up to 50% of women will experience depressive symptoms after diagnosis, associated with poor prognosis and survival. An increasing number of Veteran women live in rural areas, where access to behavioral health care may be limited. This study sought to evaluate rural disparities in mental health screening and follow-up evaluation after a new BC diagnosis. Methods: Women Veterans with a new BC diagnosis were identified between 2017 and 2021. Data for mental health screenings [Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-2, PHQ-9, General Anxiety Disorder-7] were collected subsequent to the first BC diagnosis. Rurality was defined per the USDA Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes framework to determine rurality based on population density and commuting patterns. Data were abstracted from several large VA and non-VA datasets, including the Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) Outpatient files, non-VA Care Medical and Pharmacy System files, Program Integrity Tool, and VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure for Oncology. Rurality data was specified using CDW designations combined with ZIP-code-level USDA RUCA information. All categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square tests. Means were tested using t-tests. Results: 14,225 Veteran women with a new BC diagnosis were identified. The mean age was 63.4 (SD 11.7). The most common documented race was White (30.6%), followed by Black (15.7%). 59.6% lived in an urban setting as opposed to rural setting (40.4%). In the entire population, only 14% had a mental health screening within 3 months of a cancer diagnosis. Veteran women living in an urban setting were more likely to be screened compared to those living in a rural setting (17.4% vs 9.2%, p &lt; 0.001). For women screened within 3 months, most screened negative, regardless of rurality (76.1% rural, 75.7% urban). Of women who had a positive mental health screen within 3 months, only approximately one-third (31.8% rural, 34.2% urban) had additional screening regardless of rurality. However, for those with a negative initial screen, urban Veterans were more likely to have any additional screening (17% vs 10.2%, p = 0.001). PHQ-2 was the most common mental health screening tool used (73.8%) followed by a combination of PHQ-9 and GAD-7 (9.6%). Conclusions: Mental health screening within 3 months of breast cancer diagnosis is low for Veteran women. There is a significant difference in screening between rural and urban populations. It is critical to both improve mental health screening overall in this population and bridge the disparity gap between screening in rural and urban Veteran women. This may impact not only mental health but also breast cancer outcomes during the period encompassing treatment and survivorship.

Improvements in Transitional Care Among Medicaid-Insured Patients With Serious Mental Illness.

The Thrive program is an evidenced-based care model for Medicaid-insured adults in the hospital-to-home transition. A substantial portion of Thrive participants live with serious mental illness (SMI), yet Thrive's efficacy has not been tested among these patients. To compare 30-day postdischarge outcomes between Thrive participants with and without SMI and explore Thrive's appropriateness and acceptability among participants with SMI. We conducted a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study of 252 (62 with SMI) Thrive participants discharged from an academic medical center from February 2021 to August 2023. Interviews of participants with SMI were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis. Participants with and without SMI experienced similar rates of 30-day readmissions, emergency room visits, and postdischarge follow-up visits, with these differences being nonsignificant. Participants with SMI were highly satisfied with Thrive's care coordination and attention to social needs, yet participants suggested stronger connections to behavioral health care. Participants with and without SMI benefit equitably from Thrive.

Parent Training for Disruptive Behaviors in Referred Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether face-to-face and therapist-assisted online (i.e., blended) behavioral parent training are effective on reducing disruptive behaviors in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in routine mental health care. Ninety-seven children with ASD (4-13years; 76 boys) were randomized to face-to-face parent training, blended parent training, or a waitlist control condition. We assessed treatment effects on parent-rated child noncompliance (primary outcome) and irritability (secondary outcome). This involved comparing both formats separately to the control condition using linear regression models. Child behaviors at 6months follow-up were also examined. Children in the face-to-face parent training condition improved significantly more on noncompliance and irritability than children in the waitlist condition and improvements sustained to 6months follow-up. Children in the blended condition did not improve more than children in the waitlist condition and attrition was high. Our results extend findings from efficacy studies to routine mental health care and advocate the use of face-to-face parent training for disruptive behaviors in children with ASD. More research into blended parent training programs for children with ASD and disruptive behaviors in routine mental health care should be conducted to draw more definite conclusions about the value of blended parent training for these children. Trial registration number NL4712; date of registration 22-10-2014.

Psychometric Validation of the Brief Outcome Survey: A Transdiagnostic Tool for Measurement-Based Care

ABSTRACT Background Measurement-based care (MBC) is a fundamental component of evidence-based psychotherapy that has the potential to improve the landscape of behavioral and mental health (BMH) care for youth and families. Objective The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability, validity, and clinical utility of the Brief Outcome Survey (BOS) when used as part of a comprehensive MBC approach during a course of evidence-based psychotherapy. Method The BOS is a three-item transdiagnostic tool designed to measure the impact of youth’s symptoms/conditions on functioning. Demographic and clinical data were obtained via a retrospective chart review of 75,000+ unique patient encounters over a period of 15 years. Internal consistency, test re-test reliability, construct validity, validity generalization, and clinical utility were assessed. Results Data were analyzed from 8,665 youth (Mage = 11.8 years; 57.2% biological female). The internal consistency coefficient (e.g. Cronbach’s alpha) ranged from 0.80–0.83 (first and second BOS administration). The single measure intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.66 (p < .001). Intraclass correlations between the BOS and the PHQ-9, GAD-7, and CY-BOCS were moderate. No significant differences were found by age. Cronbach’s alphas for the age groups ranged from 0.79–0.82. BOS scores were higher at baseline for biological females compared to males, t(8235) = 2.29, p < .001. Similarly, BOS scores were higher at baseline for youth receiving public versus private health insurance benefits, t(8032) = 2.29, p < .05. A one-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in BOS scores by diagnosis group and Cronbach’s alpha for the BOS was above 0.80 across all five diagnosis groups analyzed. Conclusions The BOS demonstrated evidence of strong psychometric properties and clinical utility, as a session-by-session transdiagnostic MBC tool.