Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index Scores Research Articles

Impact of Orthopedic Surgical Intervention on Difficult-to-Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Propensity Score Matched Study.

To elucidate the therapeutic effect of orthopedic surgical intervention (OSI) in difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA) compared with non-D2T RA. A total of 534 recent surgeries were analyzed only in patients who had undergone OSI since 2016 and for whom a 12-month post-operative follow-up was available. D2T RA was determined according to the EULAR definition, and patients with D2T RA were matched to patients with non-D2T RA using propensity scores calculated by a logistic regression analysis. The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Disease Activity Index 28 (DAS28), face scale, and patient's assessment of general health (GH) were measured repeatedly at baseline and 6 and 12 months and were compared using a two-way analysis of variance. The HAQ-DI, DAS28, face scale, and GH showed significant post-operative improvements, and there were significant differences in the HAQ-DI and face scale scores between D2T RA and non-D2T RA. An additional analysis with DAS28 as a covariate showed no significant interaction for either, suggesting that these improvements in clinical assessment were due to OSI rather than improved disease activity. In the absence of an effective pharmacological treatment strategy, OSI may be an effective treatment modality for the management of D2T RA.

Effective Assessment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity and Outcomes Using Monocyte Chemotactic Protein-1 (MCP-1) and Disease Activity Score 28-MCP-1

The effectiveness of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-MCP-1 (DAS28-MCP-1) in assessing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity is unclear, although some studies have demonstrated their potential usefulness. The present study investigated relationships between MCP-1 and different DAS28 measures, the occurrence of residual swollen joints in different DAS28 remission statuses, changes in medication dosage in relation to the 2005 modified American Rheumatism Association and 2011 American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) remission definitions, and the correlations between different DAS28-related scores and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores in two RA patient cohorts. The results revealed that the MCP-1 level was correlated with five disease activity measures (DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28-ESR], DAS28-C-reactive protein [CRP], Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and DAS28-MCP-1) in multivariable regression analysis (all p < 0.05; ESR, CRP, and MCP-1 as independent variables). However, ESR was not significantly associated with SDAI and CDAI scores (p = 0.343 and 0.323, respectively). Residual swollen joints were more frequently observed in patients who met the DAS28-ESR remission criteria (<2.6) compared with those meeting the other four remission criteria, with a difference ranging from 71% to 94%. Among patients meeting the DAS28-ESR remission criteria (<2.6), medication changes (dose increase by ≥30% or new medications prescribed) were less frequent in those who also met the 2011 ACR/EULAR remission criteria than in those who did not meet them (p = 0.006). Moreover, the correlation coefficients for the relationship between DAS28-ESR and HAQ-DI scores were the lowest among the five disease activity measures. In conclusion, MCP-1 and DAS28-MCP-1 are effective in assessing RA disease activity, with less residual joint swelling and less frequent medication increases observed in the DAS28-MCP-1 remission < 2.2 subgroup.

Guselkumab in Biologic-Naïve Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis in Russia: A Post Hoc Analysis of the DISCOVER-1 and -2 Randomized Clinical Trials.

There are limited data on the use of advanced therapies to treat psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in Russia. Guselkumab, an interleukin (IL)-23p19-subunit inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy in patients with PsA in the phase3 DISCOVER-1 and -2, and COSMOS trials. This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with PsA in Russia. This posthoc analysis of DISCOVER-1 and -2 included 1002 biologic-naïve patients with active PsA from Russia (n = 317) and the rest of the world (RoW; n = 685). Patients received guselkumab 100mg every 4weeks (Q4W), or at week0 and 4 then Q8W, or placebo then guselkumab Q4W at week24 (Russian: n = 119, 88, and 110, respectively; RoW: n = 216, 246, and 223, respectively). Outcomes through week52 were pooled (DISCOVER-1 and -2); outcomes from week52 to 100 represent DISCOVER-2 only. In patients from Russia, ≥ 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) criteria response rates were higher with guselkumab vs. placebo at week24, increased through week52, and were consistent across all guselkumab-treated groups at week100. Similar trends were generally observed for ACR50, ≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI90), achievement of Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) low disease activity/remission and minimal disease activity, enthesitis and dactylitis resolution, ≥ 0.35 improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score, improvement in patient-reported pain, and measures in patients with axial PsA (including Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI], Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS], and patient-reported spinal pain). Efficacy responses were similar between patients from Russia and the RoW across all endpoints and timepoints. The safety profile of guselkumab in patients from Russia was consistent with previous findings. This analysis demonstrated that the safety and efficacy profiles of guselkumab across all PsA domains and patient-reported outcomes in patients from Russia were similar to those in patients from the RoW. NCT03162796 and NCT03158285.

Janus kinase inhibitors versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: meta-analytical comparison of efficacy and safety.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by persistent inflammation leading to progressively worse disability. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are pivotal in RA treatment, yet their comparative efficacy remains underexplored. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors and TNF inhibitors in treating RA using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A meta-analysis and outcomes analysis were based on results of the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Patient Global Assessment Scale (PtGA) and other indices as incidences of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and malignancy. The JAK inhibitors caused a statistically significant improvement in the HAQ-DI score [MD = 0.08, 95% CI (0.03, 0.12), p = 0.0008] compared with the TNF inhibitors. However, no significant difference was observed between the two drug classes in the CDAI score [MD = -2.03, 95% CI (-9.27, 5.22), p = 0.58]. JAK inhibitors were associated with an increase in the VAS score [MD = 3.62, 95% CI (0.86, 6.38), p = 0.01], but there was no significant difference in the PtGA score [MD = 1.91, 95% CI (-3.25, 7.08), p = 0.47]. JAK inhibitors demonstrated superior efficacy in improving the functional status and reducing the disease activity in RA patients compared with TNF inhibitors. Both drug classes exhibited comparable safety profiles for VTE and malignancies, though JAK inhibitors had a higher risk for thromboembolism.

Investigating the trajectory of functional disability in systemic sclerosis: group-based trajectory modelling of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index.

To identify the trajectories and clinical associations of functional disability in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study (ASCS) participants meeting ACR/EULAR criteria for SSc recruited within 5 years of disease onset, with ≥2 Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores were included. Group based trajectory modelling (GBTM) was used to identify the number and shape of HAQ-DI trajectories. Between group comparisons were made using the chi-squared test, two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test as appropriate. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify features associated with trajectory group membership. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazard modelling. We identified two HAQ-DI trajectory groups within 426 ASCS participants with incident SSc: low-stable disability (n=221, 52%), and high-increasing disability (n=205, 48%). Participants with high-increasing disability were older at disease onset, more likely to have diffuse SSc (dcSSc), cardiopulmonary disease, multimorbidity, digital ulcers, and gastrointestinal involvement (all p≤0.01), as was use of immunosuppression (p<0.01). Multimorbidity was associated with high-increasing trajectory group membership (OR3.1, 95%CI1.1-8.8, p=0.04); independently, multiple SSc features were also strongly associated including dcSSc (OR2.3, 95%CI1.3-4.2, p<0.01), proximal weakness (OR7.3, 95%CI2.0-27.1, p<0.01) and joint contractures (OR2.7, 95%CI1.3-5.3, p<0.01). High-increasing physical disability was associated with an almost two-fold increased risk of mortality (HR1.9, 95%CI1.0-3.8, p=0.05), and higher symptom burden. Two trajectories of functional disability in SSc were identified. Those with high-increasing functional disability had a distinct clinical phenotype and worse survival compared to those with low-stable functional disability. These data highlight the pervasive nature of physical disability in SSc, and its prognostic importance.

Predictors of functional improvement and pain reduction in rheumatoid arthritis patients who achieved low disease activity with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a retrospective study of the FIRST Registry

BackgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients sometimes exhibit different levels of improvement in health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) and subjective pain visual analogue score (VAS) even after achieving low disease activities (LDA). This study aimed to identify factors associated with improvement in HAQ-DI and pain VAS among those who achieved LDA.MethodsData of the FIRST registry, a multi-institutional cohort of RA patients treated with biological and targeted-synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) were analyzed. Patients who were enrolled from August 2013 to February 2023 and who achieved clinical LDA [clinical disease activity index (CDAI) ≤ 10.0] at 6 months after starting treatment were included. Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the factors that associated with achieving HAQ-DI normalization (< 0.5), HAQ-DI improvement (by > 0.22), or pain VAS reduction (≤ 40 mm).ResultsAmong 1424 patients who achieved LDA at 6 months, 732 patients achieved HAQ-DI normalization and 454 achieved pain VAS reduction. The seropositivity and the use of JAK inhibitor compared with TNF inhibitor were associated with both HAQ-DI < 0.5 and pain VAS reduction at 6 months. On the other hand, older age, past failure in ≥ 2 classes of b/tsDMARDs, higher HAQ-DI at baseline, and use of glucocorticoid were associated with the lower likelihood of HAQ-DI normalization and pain VAS reduction. Longer disease duration, being female, and higher disease activity at baseline was negatively associated HAQ-DI normalization alone. Comorbidities were not associated with the outcomes.ConclusionsThese results suggest some preferable treatment may exist for improvement of HAQ-DI and pain VAS reduction in the early stage of the treatment, which is a clue to prevention of a criteria of difficult-to-treat RA.

Enhanced surveillance for the detection of psoriatic arthritis in a UK primary care psoriasis population: results from the TUDOR trial.

Our objective was to determine whether early detection of undiagnosed psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in a primary care psoriasis population improves outcome in physical function at 24 months post-registration. A multicentre, prospective, parallel group cluster randomised controlled trial in patients with psoriasis was conducted. Participants with suspected inflammatory arthritis on screening were referred for an assessment of PsA (enhanced surveillance (ES) arm: at baseline, 12 and 24 months; standard care (SC) arm: at 24 months). The primary outcome measure was the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at 24 months post registration in participants diagnosed with PsA. A total of 2225 participants across 135 GP practices registered: 1123 allocated to ES and 1102 to SC. The primary analysis population consisted of 87 participants with a positive diagnosis of PsA: 64 in ES, 23 in SC. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for achieving a HAQ-DI score of 0 at 24 months post registration in ES compared with SC was 0.64 (95% CI (0.17, 2.38)), and the adjusted OR of achieving a higher (non-zero) HAQ-DI score at 24 months post registration in ES relative to SC arm was 1.12 (95% CI: 0.67, 1.86), indicating no evidence of a difference between the two treatment groups (p= 0.66). The trial was underpowered for demonstrating the prespecified treatment effect; in patients with psoriasis there was no evidence that early diagnosis of PsA by ES in primary care changes physical function at 24 months compared with SC. The TUDOR trial is registered as ISRCTN38877516.

Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes After Treatment With Deucravacitinib in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: Results From a Randomized Phase 2 Trial.

Deucravacitinib, a tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, was assessed in a phase 2 trial in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Here, we report effects of deucravacitinib from the patient perspective. This phase 2, double-blind trial (NCT03881059) randomized patients with active PsA 1:1:1 to deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily (QD), 12 mg QD, or placebo, for 16 weeks. Key secondary end points were changes from baseline (CFBs) at week 16 in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) scores. Additional patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessed disease impact, including fatigue, pain, and mental health. The mean CFBs in PROs and percentages of patients reporting improvements with minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) or scores of greater than normal values were also assessed. This study comprised 203 patients (51.2% female; mean ± SD age, 49.8 ± 13.5 years). At week 16, the adjusted mean difference (95% confidence interval) versus placebo in HAQ-DI and SF-36 PCS CFB was significant for each deucravacitinib group (HAQ-DI 6 mg, -0.26 [-0.42 to -0.10], P = 0.0020; HAQ-DI 12 mg, -0.28 [-0.45 to -0.12], P = 0.0008; SF-36 PCS 6 mg, 3.3 [0.9 to 5.7], P = 0.0062; SF-36 PCS 12 mg, 3.5 [1.1 to 5.9], P = 0.0042). MCID at week 16 were reported for all PROs with either dose of deucravacitinib. Improvements of MCID or to normative values were reported by more patients receiving deucravacitinib than placebo. Deucravacitinib groups demonstrate significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PROs versus placebo in patients with active PsA, which warrants further study.

Central sensitization significantly deteriorates functionality and the interpretation of self-reported disease activity in primary Sjögren's syndrome.

Central sensitization has a major role in health-related parameters in musculoskeletal conditions. There is still a lack of understanding regarding the impact of central sensitization on the interpretation of disease activity and functional disability in primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS). The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) was used to screen for central sensitization. Disease-related parameters, including objective tests, medication use, the EULAR SS Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI), and the EULAR SS Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI), were assessed. Functionality, quality of life, sleep, and mental health were evaluated by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Scale (JSS), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), respectively. The effect of central sensitization on functionality and disease activity measures was assessed by regression analyses. The frequency of central sensitization was 65% in patients with pSS (n = 60). Patients with central sensitization had higher HAQ-DI, ESSPRI, HADS, and JSS and lower SF-36 subdomain scores (p < 0.05 for all). A significant positive correlation was observed between the CSI scoreand theESSPRI, JSS, HAQ-DI, and HADS scores (Spearman's rho ranging from 0.342 to 0.739). The multiple regression analysis indicated that CSI was independently associated with HAQ-DI (adjusted R2 = 0.19, B = 0.01) and ESSPRI (adjusted R2 = 0.45, B = 0.08) (p < 0.001 for all). This study confirms that central sensitization has a major impact on functionality and the interpretation of self-reported disease activity in pSS. When devising strategies for the management of patients with pSS, it is crucial to consider these close relationships. Key Points • The frequency of central sensitization accompanying primary Sjögren's syndrome is considerable. • Central sensitization was independently associated with functionality and self-reported disease activity assessment. • This close association leads to challenges in functionality, evaluating treatment response, and planning or switching between therapies in primary Sjögren's syndrome.

Correlation between disease activity and patient-reported health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study

ObjectiveWe aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of different activities and to evaluate the correlation between clinical activity...

Predictors of Remission or Combined Remission and Low Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Taiwan: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Objectives: This study aimed to identify predictors of remission or low disease activity (LDA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and low-ultrasound inflammation. Methods: A total of 80 patients with RA who fulfilled the 1987 ACR criteria for RA with a disease activity score of 28 joints (DAS28) > 3.2 were recruited. Over 1 year of therapy, we conducted blood tests every 6 months to examine erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), neuraminidase 3 (Neu3), and α-2,3-sialyltrasnferse I (ST3Gal-1) levels in B cells and monocytes. Additionally, we evaluated physical function by using the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Data on demographic and clinical parameters were collected, and musculoskeletal ultrasonography was performed twice a year on 12 specific joints to assess synovial changes. One year later, we compared all collected data and laboratory or ultrasound results between patients achieving remission or LDA and those who did not in order to determine the predictors. Results: Age, the presence or absence of rheumatoid factor, and the number of conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs used were not correlated with remission or LDA for DAS28 or Simplified Disease Activity Index formulas. However, male sex, low CRP levels, low ESR levels, and low HAQ-DI scores were associated with a higher likelihood of achieving remission or LDA for DAS28-ESR. Negative anticyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) and low HAQ-DI scores were predictors of remission or LDA for DAS28-MCP-1. Interestingly, having less than two comorbidities is a good predictor of a combined remission/low disease activity state for SDAI and DAS28-MCP-1. Furthermore, Neu3 and ST3Gal-1 levels and ST3Gal-1/Neu3 ratios in B cells and monocytes had no significant correlation with total ultrasound scores. Nevertheless, monocyte ST3Gal-1 and Neu3 correlated significantly with DAS28-ESR >5.1 and DAS-MCP-1 >4.8 (both categories belong to high disease activity), respectively (rho = 0.609 with p = 0.012, and rho = 0.727 with p = 0.011, respectively). Monocyte ST3Gal-1/Neu3 ratios connected with DAS28-ESR >5.1 and 3.3 < SDAI ≦ 11 (low disease activity), respectively (rho = 0.662 with p = 0.005, and rho = 0.342 with p = 0.048, respectively). Conclusions: In patients with RA in Taiwan, male sex, low CRP levels, low ESR levels, and low HAQ-DI scores are predictors of remission or LDA for DAS28-ESR, which differ from the predictors for DAS28-MCP-1. Moreover, monocyte ST3Gal-1, Neu3, and their ratios correlated with different disease activity categories of DAS28-ESR, DAS28-MCP-1, and SDAI scores.

OA04 Efficacy and safety of nipocalimab in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis: the multicenter, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 2a IRIS-RA study

Abstract Background/Aims Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with autoantibodies. Despite the use of targeted therapies, up to half of patients fail to achieve remission or low disease activity (LDA). Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs), key autoantibodies that predict progression of joint destruction in RA, are largely an immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype. Nipocalimab is a high affinity, fully human, IgG1 monoclonal antibody that is designed to selectively block the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), preventing recirculation and thereby lowering IgG levels, potentially including ACPAs and other pathogenic antibodies. In this phase 2a proof-of-concept study (IRIS-RA; NCT04991753), we report the efficacy and safety of nipocalimab in patients with moderate to severe, active RA. Methods Eligible adult patients with moderate to severe RA (≥6 swollen/tender joints), positive for ACPA or rheumatoid factor, and ≥1 advanced therapies, were randomized 3:2 to receive intravenous 15 mg/kg nipocalimab or placebo every 2 weeks for 10 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) at Week 12. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients who achieved ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, and ACR90 responses, DAS28-CRP remission, and change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12. Results In total, 53 patients were enrolled (nipocalimab, n = 33; placebo, n = 20). Most patients were female (67.9%) and white (90.6%) with a median age of 59 (range, 26-74) years. Demographic and baseline disease characteristics were comparable between groups except higher CRP in placebo. At Week 12, patients treated with nipocalimab showed a numerically greater mean (standard deviation [SD]) change in DAS28-CRP score compared to the placebo group (-1.17 [1.34] vs -0.62 [0.96]; mean difference [95% confidence interval], -0.45 [-1.17-0.28]; p=0.224). A numerically higher proportion of patients achieved ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, and ACR90 responses compared to placebo. In the nipocalimab group, 7 (21.2%) patients achieved DAS28-CRP remission compared to 2 (10.0%) patients in the placebo group (treatment difference, 9.9% [-9.5-29.3%]; p=0.456). Similarly, patients in the nipocalimab group had a numerically greater mean (SD) improvement in HAQ-DI score (-0.27 [0.55] vs -0.11 [0.36], respectively). The proportion of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were 81.8% vs 60.0% in the nipocalimab vs placebo groups. In the nipocalimab group, 3 serious TEAEs were reported, including burn infection, infusion-related reaction, and deep-vein thrombosis. There were no TEAEs that led to death. Conclusion Treatment with nipocalimab resulted in consistent and numerically higher improvements across ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, and ACR90 responses, as well as DAS28-CRP, DAS28-CRP remission, and HAQ-DI, with acceptable safety profile. Nipocalimab showed activity in patients with moderate to severe RA and warrants further investigation to understand the predictors of nipocalimab response. Disclosure P.C. Taylor: Consultancies; AbbVie, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Fresenius, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer Inc, Sanofi, Aqtual, and UCB. Grants/research support; Galapagos. G. Schett: None. F. Ibrahim: Corporate appointments; Employee of Janssen Research &amp; Development. B. Zhou: Corporate appointments; Employee of Janssen Research &amp; Development. J. Leu: Corporate appointments; Employee of Janssen Research &amp; Development. S. Liva: Corporate appointments; Employee of Janssen Research &amp; Development. Q. Wang: Corporate appointments; Employee of Janssen Research &amp; Development. R. Rojo Cella: Corporate appointments; Employee of Janssen Research &amp; Development. C.S. Karyekar: Corporate appointments; Employee of Janssen Research &amp; Development. K. Fei: Corporate appointments; Employee of Janssen Research &amp; Development.

P188 Frailty and its impact on patient-reported outcomes in polymyalgia rheumatica

Abstract Background/Aims Frailty is an increasingly important construct in the field of rheumatology, aiding the identification of individuals with increased vulnerability to accelerated clinical decline, and overall worse disease outcomes. The aim of this research was to explore the prevalence of frailty and its potential associated impact on patient reported outcomes (PROs) in a cohort of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). Methods Patients with a diagnosis of PMR (fulfilling the 2012 EULAR/ACR Provisional Classification Criteria), who were in clinical remission and on active treatment with glucocorticoids were recruited from two centres. Patients were &amp;gt;3 months and &amp;lt;12 months from diagnosis. Frailty was defined by the 5 criteria of the widely validated Fried Phenotypic Frailty Index. Patient-reported outcomes included anxiety, using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7), mood using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), fatigue using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F), pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and overall health related quality of life using the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). The associations between categorical variables were compared using the -test or Fishers exact test. The association between continuous variables and categorical variables was assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Correlations were calculated using Pearson’s r. All analyses were conducted using R (R Core Team, 2022). A p-value of &amp;lt; 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results 51 consecutive patients were recruited, of which 56.9% (n = 29) were female. Using the Fried Phenotypic Index, 64.7% (n = 33) were classified as robust, 27.5% (n = 14) as pre-frail and 7.8% (n = 4) as frail. All patients classified as frail were female and had a statistically significantly higher BMI (p = 0.040) than those in the robust and pre-frail categories. Compared to robust individuals, those who were frail had statistically significant higher median GAD-7 (p = 0.003), PHQ-9 (p = 0.001), VAS (p = &amp;lt;0.001) and HAQ-DI (p = &amp;lt;0.001) scores. FACIT-F scores were also worse in those who were frail versus robust (p = 0.001). Conclusion Over one third of patients with PMR in this cohort were classified as pre-frail or frail. Increased frailty status was significantly correlated with worse PROs, including mood, pain, fatigue and overall quality of life. As frailty is a potentially reversible state, accurately identifying frailty, and implementing appropriate interventions is of utmost importance to ensure improved clinical outcomes in those with PMR. Disclosure P. Harkins: Grants/research support; British Society for Rheumatology. S. Cowley: None. R. Harrington: None. D. Kane: None. R. Conway: None.

P116 Effectiveness and safety of biosimilar etanercept GP2015 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the UK: results from the COMPACT study

Abstract Background/Aims COMPACT is a non-interventional, multinational cohort study to evaluate effectiveness, safety and quality of life (QoL) outcomes in patients with rheumatic diseases treated with GP2015, an approved etanercept (ETN) biosimilar, under real-world conditions. Here, we present data from patients in the UK with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) enrolled in the COMPACT study, focusing on those who switched to GP2015 from reference ETN or another biosimilar ETN. Methods The COMPACT study included patients (≥18 years of age) with rheumatic diseases treated with GP2015. This analysis includes patients from the UK diagnosed with RA who were in treatment Group A (patients in clinical remission or low disease activity under treatment with reference ETN or other biosimilar ETN, who switched to GP2015 prior to study enrolment). Effectiveness and QoL outcomes were assessed using Disease Activity Score 28-joint count (DAS28) and health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI), respectively, and are presented up to Week 24. Safety outcomes were assessed, including rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs). Results A total of 112 patients with RA who switched to GP2015 from reference ETN or another biosimilar ETN (Group A) were enrolled in the UK. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) age was 62.9 ± 11.3 years and 74.1% of patients were female. The mean ± SD DAS28 score remained unchanged from baseline (2.6 ± 1.3) to Week 24 (2.5 ± 1.6). The mean ± SD HAQ-DI score displayed no major difference between baseline (1.2 ± 0.8) and Week 24 (0.9 ± 0.8). Overall, 67.9% (n = 76) of patients experienced ≥1 AE and 9.8% (n = 11) of patients experienced ≥1 SAE (Table). Conclusion Over 24 weeks of treatment with GP2015, disease activity remained low and stable in patients with RA previously switched from reference ETN or from another biosimilar ETN, with no new safety concerns observed. These results from a cohort of patients with RA treated in the UK are consistent with effectiveness, QoL and safety data reported previously for the total population in the COMPACT study. Disclosure A. Askari: None. C. Both: None. A. Martin: None. D.A. Walsh: Consultancies; Consultancy fees paid to University of Nottingham: Contura International A/S, Glaxo SmithKline, AKL Research and Development Ltd, Consultancy fees paid to University of Nottingham: Pfizer Ltd, Abbvie Ltd, Ely Lilly &amp; Co.Ltd, Galapagos Ltd., Reckitt Benckiser Health Ltd. Honoraria; Speaker fees paid to David Walsh: Irish Society of Rheumatology, Speaker fees paid to University of Nottingham: Medscape International, Pfizer Ltd, Abbvie Ltd. Grants/research support; Grants paid to University of Nottingham: Versus Arthritis, UKRI, NIHR, Nuffield Foundation, Pfizer Ltd, Ely Lilly &amp; Co Ltd, UCB Pharma, Grants paid to University of Nottingham: GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development, Orion Corporation. T. Sheeran: None.

Prognostic and functional importance of both overt and subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction in systemic sclerosis

ObjectivesTo quantify the frequency and clinical implications of systemic sclerosis (SSc)-associated left ventricular function (LV) impairment. MethodsAustralian Scleroderma Cohort Study participants meeting ACR/EULAR criteria for SSc with ≥1 echocardiographic LVEF measurement were included. Overt LV dysfunction was indicated by reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and subclinical LV dysfunction was measured using impaired LV global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS>-16 %). Those with secondary causes of LV dysfunction (myocardial ischaemia, valvulopathy and pulmonary arterial hypertension) were excluded. Chi-squared tests, two-sample t-tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for between-group comparison as appropriate. Generalised estimating equations(GEE) were used to model longitudinal data. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used for survival analyses. ResultsOf 1141 participants with no co-morbid cardiac disease, 2.4 % ever recorded a LVEF<50 %, while only 0.6 % ever recorded a LVEF≤40 %. LV-GLS data were available for 90 % of participants at one centre (n = 218). Impaired LV-GLS was detected in 21 % despite LVEF≥50 %. Those with a LVEF<50 % were more frequently male (p = 0.01) with dcSSc (p < 0.01), higher inflammatory markers (p < 0.02) and skeletal muscle disease (p < 0.05). In multivariable analyses, recording a LVEF<50 % was associated with increased mortality (HR2.3, 95 %CI1.0–4.8, p = 0.04). Impaired LV-GLS was also associated with poorer survival in univariable analyses (HR3.4, 95 %CI1.0–11.8, p = 0.05). Those with a LVEF<50 % more frequently recorded WHO Class III/IV dyspnoea (OR3.5, 95 %CI1.6–7.7, p < 0.01), with shorter six-minute walk distance (p = 0.01), higher Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores (p < 0.01) and lower Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary scores (p = 0.02). Increased dyspnoea (WHO Class III/IV dyspnoea; OR3.6, 95 %CI1.4–9.2, p < 0.01) was also seen in those with impaired LV-GLS. ConclusionsBoth overt and subclinical SSc-associated LV dysfunction are associated with worse survival and impaired physical function. The frequency of abnormal LV-GLS in those with consistently normal LVEF suggests an under-appreciated burden of subtle LV systolic dysfunction in SSc that has a significant impact on patient symptomatology.

Central sensitivity syndrome affects the disease activity index and treatment satisfaction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Many rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients prioritize pain improvement in treatment. As pain can result from various causes, including noninflammatory factors such as central sensitivity syndrome (CSS), we hypothesized that CSS might impact treatment satisfaction. In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the CSS effects on clinical disease activity and treatment satisfaction in RA patients. In total, 220 consecutive RA patients receiving long-term follow-up were evaluated for clinical disease activity and treatment satisfaction. CSS was evaluated using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). An overall score of ≥40 indicates the presence of CSS. We queried "How satisfied are you with your treatment?"; answers included (a) very satisfied, (b) satisfied, (c) not satisfied, or (d) very dissatisfied. For univariate analysis, we condensed these answers into "dissatisfied" or "satisfied." We also evaluated treatment satisfaction using the visual analog scale (VAS), with scores ranging from 0 mm (very dissatisfied) to 100 mm (very satisfied). Of the 220 patients, 17 (7.7%) were classified as having CSS. CSI score was significantly correlated with the clinical disease activity index (CDAI; r = .322, p < .01) and treatment satisfaction (r = -.336, p < .01). Regarding treatment satisfaction, univariate analysis revealed that patient global assessment (PtGA), pain VAS, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C-reactive protein, CDAI, and CSI scores of patients who were satisfied with treatment differed significantly from those of dissatisfied patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that CSI, PtGA, and HAQ-DI scores were associated with treatment satisfaction. In RA patients, CSS may affect the disease activity index and reduce treatment satisfaction.

Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib for chronic plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

To summarize and analyze the results of published randomized controlled trials of tofacitinib for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis(PsA) and discuss its efficacy and safety. An exhaustive systematic search encompassing PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted up to July 2023. Studies eligible for inclusion were analyzed, organized using Review Manager version 5.4.1 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) and STATA 15.0 version (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA) software. A total of six articles, covering 1393 patients (844 treated with tofacitinib and 549 with placebo), were included. The foundational characteristics of tofacitinib and placebo group showed similarity, except for age and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score, especially in the context of chronic plaque psoriasis. It is noteworthy that we discovered tofacitinib exhibited a significant impact on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) response, Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) response, and adverse events (AEs) in cases of chronic plaque psoriasis. Similarly, tofacitinib demonstrated substantial influence on American College of Rheumatology 20/50 (ACR20/50) response, PASI75 response, as well as alterations in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score, Dactylitis Severity Score (DSS), and Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) Score in the context of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Nevertheless, there was no statistically significant impact of tofacitinib on serious adverse events (SAEs) in chronic plaque psoriasis, as well as on both adverse events (AEs) and SAEs in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). A comprehensive analysis revealed that tofacitinib has a positive effect on addressing skin and joint symptoms, as well as improving the quality of life for patients with chronic plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, the safety of the drug's long-term usage even requires further validation. Key Points • In 6 analyses involving a total of 1393 patients, tofacitinib exhibits positive effect on the treatment of both chronic plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). • Although dose-based subgroup analyses have demonstrated effectiveness. Some studies indicate that the 5-mg dose (twice daily) may not show an effect due to the failure of non-inferiority trials comparing tofacitinib with placebo. Therefore, caution is required when interpreting its effectiveness. On the other hand, the 10-mg dose (BID) has been associated with an increase in adverse events and serious adverse events,and is recommended to be used with caution in patients with cardiovascular or uveitis risk factors. • Tofacitinib has efficacy in comorbid psychiatric disorders (depression, anxiety, or Alzheimer's disease) and inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis), but patients with comorbid renal insufficiency, hepatic dysfunction, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, or uveitis may need to be moderated or avoided with tofacitinib.

Quality of Life and Disability in Chikungunya Arthritis.

Chikungunya virus infection, transmitted by Aedes mosquito vectors, causes outbreaks of chikungunya fever (CHIKF), throughout the tropical and subtropical world. Following acute infection, many CHIKF patients develop a second phase, chronic and disabling arthritis. To evaluate the impact of chikungunya arthritis (CHIKA) on quality of life and disability in a cohort of Brazilian CHIKA patients. We conducted a descriptive, non-interventionist, retrospective cross-sectional study analysing data collected from the medical records of chikungunya virus-infected patients treated between June 1, 2022, and June 30, 2022, in the Brazilian rheumatology clinic of one of us (JKA). To assess disability, quality of life, and pain, patients were evaluated using the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain. Forty-two women with a mean (± SD) age of 57.83 (± 13.05) years had CHIKF confirmed by chikungunya-specific serology. The mean (± SD) time between the onset of chikungunya symptoms and the first clinic visit was 55.19 (± 25.88) days. At this visit, the mean (± SD) VAS pain score and DAS28-ESR were 77.26 (± 23.71) and 5.8 (± 1.29), respectively. The mean (± SD) HAQDI score was 1.52 (± 0.67). The mean (± SD) SF-12 PCS-12 was 29.57 (± 8.62) and SF-12 MCS-12 was 38.42 (± 9.85). CHIKA is often highly disabling. As the mosquito vectors that transmit this illness have spread to every continent except Antarctica, there is a potential for widespread public health impact from CHIKA and the need for more effective, early intervention to prevent CHIKA.

Associations of current and childhood socioeconomic status and health outcomes amongst patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis in a Mexico City family-practice setting

ObjectivesTo examine the association of current and childhood socioeconomic status (SES) with patient-reported functional status, quality of life and disability in patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsCross-sectional study amongst individuals seeking care for any medical reason in a primary care family-practice clinic in Mexico City. We included individuals with self-reported doctor-diagnosed arthritis, recruited through waiting-room posters and invitations by treating family physicians. We administered a survey using validated Spanish language versions of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Osteoarthritis of Lower Limbs and Quality of Life (AMICAL), and the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). To estimate current and childhood SES, we collected data on education level and occupation type for both the patient and their parents, as well as using a validated tool to estimate income quintile.ResultsWe recruited 154 patients and excluded 8 patients. There was a high correlation between outcome scores. Estimated income and education levels were correlated with WOMAC, AMICAL and HAQ-DI scores, and significant differences were found in all scores by occupation type. The associations for current SES variables and outcome scores remained significant independently of age, sex, BMI, and presence of diabetes or hypertension, and were largely explained by current income in mutually adjusted models. Childhood SES – in particular as measured through maternal education – was best correlated with AMICAL scores, though its effect seemed largely mediated by its association with current SES.ConclusionsCurrent Socioeconomic Status impacts functional status, quality of life and disability amongst OA patients in Mexico City. The WOMAC, AMICAL and HAQ-DI scores correlate with each other and are all potentially useful markers of disease severity. More research is needed to elucidate the relationships between childhood SES and OA outcomes. Awareness of life-course SES may be useful in identifying patients at risk for worse outcomes.

Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and PRO Remission Rates in 12,262 Biologic-Naïve Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis Treated With Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Routine Care.

To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after initiation of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment in European real-world patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Further, to investigate PRO remission rates across treatment courses, registries, disease duration, sex, and age at disease onset. Visual analog scale or numerical rating scale scores for pain, fatigue, patient global assessment (PtGA), and the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) from 12,262 patients with PsA initiating a TNFi in 13 registries were pooled. PRO remission rates (pain ≤ 1, fatigue ≤ 2, PtGA ≤ 2, and HAQ-DI ≤ 0.5) were calculated for patients still on the treatment. For the first TNFi, median pain score was reduced by approximately 50%, from 6 to 3, 3, and 2; as were fatigue scores, from 6 to 4, 4, and 3; PtGA scores, from 6 to 3, 3, and 2; and HAQ-DI scores, from 0.9 to 0.5, 0.5, and 0.4 at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Six-month Lund Efficacy Index (LUNDEX)-adjusted remission rates for pain, fatigue, PtGA, and HAQ-DI scores were 24%, 31%, 36%, and 43% (first TNFi); 14%, 19%, 23%, and 29% (second TNFi); and 9%, 14%, 17%, and 20% (third TNFi), respectively. For biologic-naïve patients with disease duration < 5 years, 6-month LUNDEX-adjusted remission rates for pain, fatigue, PtGA, and HAQ-DI scores were 22%, 28%, 33%, and 42%, respectively. Corresponding rates for patients with disease duration > 10 years were 27%, 32%, 41%, and 43%, respectively. Remission rates were 33%, 40%, 45%, and 56% for men and 17%, 23%, 24%, and 32% for women, respectively. For patients aged < 45 years at diagnosis, 6-month LUNDEX-adjusted remission rate for pain was 29% vs 18% for patients ≥ 45 years. In 12,262 biologic-naïve patients with PsA, 6 months of treatment with a TNFi reduced pain by approximately 50%. Marked differences in PRO remission rates across treatment courses, registries, disease duration, sex, and age at onset of disease were observed, emphasizing the potential influence of factors other than disease activity on PROs.