Healing Of Venous Leg Ulcers Research Articles

Satisfactory result of great saphenous vein endovenous laser ablation until below the knee on active venous leg ulcer: a case series

Background Active venous leg ulcer (VLU) is the most severe manifestation of chronic venous disease which not only affects patients’ health, but also decreases the quality of life, and delivers economic burdens. Treatment of superficial venous reflux with early endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) has been associated with reducing ulcer recurrence levels and promoting faster VLU healing. We reported three cases of patients with active VLU undergoing EVLA with different approaches. Case illustration Three patients came with complaint of leg ulcer, diagnosed with C6sEpAsdPr, with venous clinical severity scores (VCSS) of 15, 23, and 22 respectively. Severe great saphenous veins (GSV) reflux was found in all patients by duplex ultrasound examination. The second patient had undergone above-the-knee EVLA. All patients underwent EVLA using 1470-nano meter wavelength laser device and ELVeS radial fiber (Biolitec, Bonn, Germany). The laser energy protocol used was 6 W linear endovenous energy density (LEED) 50 J/cm for proximal until media ATK GSV ablation, 5 W LEED 40 J/cm for media ATK until proximal below-the-knee (BTK) GSV, and 2 W LEED 20 J/cm for proximal until distal BTK GSV. The third patient was also treated with EVLA for small saphenous vein severe reflux. Follow-up until 6 months post-EVLA showed significant healing of the ulcer with 14, 16, and 17 VCSS reduction consecutively without any complication. Conclusion We’ve reported three cases of patients with active VLU undergoing EVLA until BTK with significant results. The EVLA of GSV until BTK where there is still significant reflux is safe and provides satisfactory results in patients with VLU.

Dysregulated S100A9 Expression Impairs Matrix Deposition in Chronic Wounds.

Chronic non-healing wounds are characterized by persistent inflammation, excessive matrix-degrading proteolytic activity and compromised extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis. Previous studies showed that S100A8/A9 are strongly dysregulated in delayed wound healing and impair the proper function of immune cells. Here, we demonstrate an unrecognized pathological function of S100A9 overexpression in wounds with impaired healing that directly affects ECM functions in fibroblasts. S100A9 was analyzed in two different mouse models mimicking the features of the two most prominent types of non-healing wounds in humans. Db/db mice were used as a model for diabetes-associated impaired wound healing. Iron-overloaded mice were used to mimic the conditions of impaired wound healing in chronic venous leg ulcers. The skin wounds of both mouse models are characterized by delayed wound closure, high and sustained expression of pro-inflammatory mediators and a substantially decreased ECM deposition, all together the hallmarks of non-healing wounds in humans. The wounds of both mouse models also present a solid and prolonged expression of S100A8 and S100A9 that coincides with a compromised ECM deposition and that was confirmed in chronic wounds in humans. Mechanistically, we reveal that S100A9 directly affects ECM deposition by shifting the balance of expression of ECM proteins and ECM degrading enzymes in fibroblasts via toll-like-receptor 4-dependent signaling. Consequently, blocking S100A9 during delayed wound healing in db/db mice restores fibroblast ECM functions eliciting increased matrix deposition. Our data indicate that the dysregulation of S100A9 directly contributes to a compromised ECM deposition in chronic wounds and further suggests S100A9 as a promising therapeutic target to improve tissue repair in chronic wounds.

Impact of primary dressings on healing of venous leg ulcers: a French cohort study from the healthcare insurance database.

Multicomponent bandages (MCBs) are recommended by the French Authority for Health (Haute Autorité de Santé) as first-line treatment for venous leg ulcers (VLUs). A first analysis of the data collected from the French administrative healthcare database (Système National des Données de Santé (SNDS)) on 25,255 patients with a VLU supported superiority of MCBs versus short stretch bandages when considering the healing outcomes and costs associated with closure of these wounds. The aim of this study was to assess how beneficial the primary dressing (technology lipido-colloid nano-oligosaccharide factor (TLC NOSF) or control dressing group (CDG)) could be, when used in combination with MCBs in the treatment of VLUs. Data from the SNDS were collected for patients meeting the following inclusion criteria: treatment for a VLU with MCBs and with the same dressing type (TLC-NOSF or CDG) during the whole treatment period. Healing outcomes were documented on the global cohorts and propensity score-matched cohorts. The mean healthcare cost and the ecological impact were calculated for those patients healed within the study period. In total, 12,507 patients met the criteria for treatment with both MCBs and TLC-NOSF dressings (n=1134) versus MCBs and CDG (n=11,373); with 1134 and 2268 patients per group following propensity score matching. Healing outcomes were favourable for the TLC-NOSF group in the global cohort and were enhanced in the propensity score-matched cohorts. At every point of the analysis, the adjusted healing rates were significantly higher in the TLC-NOSF group than in the CDG group (p<0.001). In the propensity score-matched cohorts (n=3402), the healing rate at three months was 52% in the TLC-NOSF group versus 37% in the CDG group (p<0.001). The median healing time was 87 days versus 125.5 days in the TLC-NOSF and CDG groups, respectively (p<0.0001). TLC-NOSF dressings significantly reduced the average treatment cost per healed ulcer (€2099) by 23.7% compared with dressings without TLC-NOSF (€2751) (p<0.001), as well as the resources used. This SNDS analysis confirms, in the largest real-life study performed in VLU management, the superiority of the TLC-NOSF dressings versus those not impregnated with the NOSF compound. Better clinical outcomes associated with cost savings and a positive ecological impact support the combination of MCBs and TLC-NOSF dressings and should be considered as an optimal standard of care for the global management of VLUs. These outcomes reinforce the current positions of the international guidelines on the use of NOSF impregnated dressings (UrgoStart range; Laboratoires Urgo, France) in this pathology.

Axial Ablation versus Terminal Interruption of the Reflux Source (AAVTIRS): A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Treatment of reflux has been shown to improve time to healing of Venous Leg Ulcers (VLU). Terminal Interruption of the Reflux Source (TIRS) treats reflux within the plexus of veins around an active VLU using foam sclerotherapy. The efficacy of TIRS in managing VLU has never been tested. We performed a pragmatic, single centre, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial comparing endovenous ablation of the axial superficial veins (Axial Ablation-AA) vs TIRS. Patients of any age with VLU of any duration were eligible. 98 Participants were randomised to AA or TIRS. 39/55, 70.9% (95%CI; 57.1-82.37) healed their VLU in the AA group, while 29/39, 74.36% (95%CI; 57.87-86.96) healed their VLU in the TIRS group, P = 0.45.4 were lost to follow-up. Median time to ulcer healing was 84 days (95%CI; 74.67-93.33) in the axial ablation group and 84 days (95%CI; 73.02-94.98) in the TIRS group. Hazard Ratio for ulcer healing with AA vs TIRS was 0.96 (95%CI 0.59-1.56). There were no significant quality of life differences. The AAVTIRS trial did not show that axial ablation was superior to TIRS in the primary outcome of number of VLU healed in 6 months, or time to VLU healing. This trial is not powered to show non-inferiority. TIRS is a viable option for treatment of VLU. Further investigation is necessary before it can be recommended as an alternative to axial ablation.Trial registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT04484168.

Association of Tryptophan/Kynurenine Metabolites with Healing in Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers.

Objective: Chronic wound healing is a complex process that is still not well understood. The tryptophan (TRP)-l-kynurenine (KYN) pathway has recently been under increased scrutiny with regard to wound healing. The study applied metabolomics to elucidate the TRP-l-KYN pathway associated with wound healing in chronic venous leg ulcers (CVLUs). Approach: This study used a longitudinal comparative design of 60 serum samples collected from 30 older adult patients with CVLUs, receiving weekly sharp debridement at a wound clinic. The serum samples were collected at baseline and week 4 (healed wounds) or week 8 (nonhealed wounds). Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) metabolomics was used to analyze targeted metabolites. A Bayesian approach was used to examine robust correlations between changes in metabolite values and linear healing slope and to compare by group. Results: The mean age was 71.13 (±9.46 years). Half of the sample were female and the minority (17%) were Black. The mean values of evaluated metabolites for the nonhealed group were consistently lower than those for the healed group. The healed group (n = 12) had higher KYN values. Those on a healing trajectory (n = 23) had lower KYN levels and higher TRP levels at baseline and over time. There was moderate support (Bayes factor = 3.70) for a negative association between change in kynurenic acid and linear healing slope (r = -0.35, credibility intervals [CrI] = -0.62, -0.04; probability of direction [PD] = 98%). Results suggest that KYN and TRP may be markers for healing in individuals with CVLUs. Innovation and Conclusion: Gaining a better understanding of the associations between the TRP-l-KYN pathway and the healing of CVLUs may help to clarify the links of inflammation with the rate and success of wound healing. Biomarker development focused on the TRP-l-KYN pathway could be pursued, if the associations are further supported by focused research studies.

Single-center clinical experience of cyanoacrylate embolization method for incompetent perforating veins in treating CEAP-6 patients

ObjectiveThe most severe form of chronic venous insufficiency includes venous leg ulcers in the CEAP-6 stage. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between incompetent perforator veins occluding with cyanoacrylate and closure of perforator veins and healing of venous leg ulcers in patients at the CEAP-6 stage. MethodsA total of 187 patients who underwent cyanoacrylate application to incompetent perforator veins due to venous leg ulcers from 2018 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Twelve months after the procedure, patients were evaluated for perforator vein closure, ulcer diameter, and Venous Clinical Severity Scale. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to estimate the probability of postoperative nonocclusion of the perforating vein based on the preoperative ulcers’ diameters and the perforating veins’ mean diameters. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the risk factors associated with incomplete closure of the perforating vein. ResultsAt the 12 months, 87.1% of patients experienced incompetent perforator veins closure, leading to complete healing of venous leg ulcers. Preoperative ulcer diameter significantly decreased from 7.20 ± 3.48 cm2 to 0.28 ± 0.77 cm2 after the procedure (P < .001). On average, 3.5 ± 1.01 perforating veins were treated, with a diameter of 4.09 ± 0.41 mm. No postoperative paresthesia or deep vein thrombosis occurred. Preoperative Venous Clinical Severity Scale scores decreased significantly from 17.85 ± 3.06 to 8.03 ± 3.53 postoperatively (P < .001). Patients with nonoccluded perforating veins had larger preoperative ulcer diameters (13.77 ± 1.78 cm2) than those with occluded perforating veins (6.24 ± 2.47 cm2; P < .001). The mean perforating vein diameter was also larger in nonoccluded perforating veins patients (4.45 ± 0.41 mm) than in occluded perforating veins patients (4.04 ± 0.38 mm; P < .001). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the preoperative ulcer diameter cutoff point of 11.25 cm2 for the possibility of postoperative nonocclusion of perforating veins were 100% each. In contrast, those for the preoperative mean perforating vein diameter cutoff point of 4.15 mm were determined as 66.7%, 79.1%, and 77.5%, respectively. The presence of diabetes mellitus increased the likelihood of incompetent perforator veins, remaining open by 3.4 times (95% confidence interval: 1.11-10.44; P = .032), whereas a 1 mm larger mean perforating vein diameter increased this likelihood by 9.36 times (95% confidence interval: 3.47-25.29; P < .001). ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that occlusion of incompetent perforator veins with cyanoacrylate is effective, safe, and associated with low complication rates in CEAP-6 patients. The findings support that cyanoacrylate occlusion of perforator veins may be a valuable option in the treatment of venous leg ulcers.

Patients with venous leg ulcers can be managed safely in the community ----results of an observational comparison study in Singapore

AimTo examine the healing outcomes of patients with venous leg ulcers requiring compression bandaging in community care versus tertiary care. MethodThis was an analytical observational cohort study. Venous leg ulcer (VLU) patients who required compression bandaging were recruited from an outpatient vascular clinic between May 2021 and August 2022. Eligible patients received two—or four-layer compression bandaging and followed up with the community care or tertiary care centre nurses. The primary outcome was the difference in the total surface area of the VLU after 12 weeks, and the secondary outcome was the patient's quality of life, as measured by the Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule (CWIS). ResultsForty-seven VLU patients were recruited; 27 received compression bandaging in the community care and 20 by the tertiary care centre. Mean age 70 years old (SD 11.04). The two most prevalent comorbidities were hypertension (51.06 %) and diabetes mellitus (38.29 %). Among those who completed follow-up (12 weeks), the median difference of the total surface area of the VLU between community-based care (p = 0.02) versus tertiary-based care (0.003) was significant. However, there was no difference in the healing status between community and tertiary-based care (p = 0.68). There was no difference in the quality of life of patients between groups. ConclusionThis first tropical study comparing VLU healing outcomes between community and tertiary care found no significant difference in healing with compression bandaging by nurses in either setting. However, the small sample size and high dropout rate limit the generalizability of the findings, necessitating a larger-scale study with longer follow-up. Despite these limitations, the study is a crucial step toward improving wound care services in Singapore, and highlights the need for further research to guide future community wound care implementation.

Impact of Area Deprivation Index on the Outcomes of Venous Leg Ulcer Healing and Recurrence

Impact of Area Deprivation Index on the Outcomes of Venous Leg Ulcer Healing and Recurrence

Impact of Great Saphenous Vein Ablation on Healing and Recurrence of Venous Leg Ulcers in Patients with Post-thrombotic Syndrome: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Impact of Great Saphenous Vein Ablation on Healing and Recurrence of Venous Leg Ulcers in Patients with Post-thrombotic Syndrome: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Improved Wound Healing by Direct Cold Atmospheric Plasma Once or Twice a Week: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers.

Objective: This study compared the effect of two frequencies of direct cold atmospheric plasma (direct-CAP) treatment with standard of care (SOC) alone on healing of venous leg ulcers (VLUs). Approach: Open-label, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04922463) on chronic VLUs at two home care organizations in the Netherlands. All three groups received SOC for 12 weeks or until healing. In addition, treatment groups received direct-CAP once (1× direct-CAP) or twice (2× direct-CAP) a week, at specialized wound care facilities and the patients' residences. Primary outcome was percentage of wounds healed. Secondary outcomes included wound area reduction and adverse events. Results: In total, 46 patients were randomly allocated to receive SOC only (n = 15), SOC + direct-CAP once a week (n = 17), or SOC + direct-CAP twice a week (n = 14). A higher percentage of wounds healed within 12 weeks in the treatment groups 53.3% (1× direct-CAP, p = 0.16) and 61.5% (2× direct-CAP, p = 0.08) versus 25.0% (control). The largest wound area reduction was obtained with 2× direct-CAP (95.2%, p = 0.07), followed by 1× direct-CAP (63.9%, p = 0.58), versus control (52.8%). Absolute wound area reduced significantly compared with baseline in both treatment groups (p ≤ 0.001), not in control (p = 0.11). No device-related serious adverse events occurred. Innovation: Direct-CAP applied once or twice a week could substantially improve wound healing of VLUs in primary care. Conclusion: Together with other clinical safety and efficacy data, these results support the integration of direct-CAP as a valuable therapy for complex wounds.

The Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Compared with Compression Therapy in Healing Venous Leg Ulcers.

Background: Innovative methods of physical therapy delivered via modern medical devices have significantly extended the possibility of applying conservative treatments in healing venous leg ulcers. The primary objective of this study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of selected mechanical physical therapies (intermittent pneumatic compression vs. radial extracorporeal shockwave vs. focal extracorporeal shockwave) vs. standard care in the treatment of venous leg ulcers over a 4-week period. Materials: This study included 69 patients, comprising 45 females (65%) and 24 males (35%), with a mean age of 67.1 ± 8.6 years (range: from 52.0 to 80.0 years). Methods: The patients were allocated into four groups: the IPC group was treated with intermittent pneumatic compression therapy, the R-ESWT group was treated with radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy, the F-ESWT group was treated with focal extracorporeal shockwave therapy, and the SC group was treated with standard care. Results: After one month of therapy, the median percentage decrease in wound total surface area after treatment was as follows: in the IPC group, there was a 52.9% decrease (range: 3.3-100%); in the R-ESWT group, there was a 31.6% decrease (range: 2.4-95.8%); in the F-ESWT group, there was an 18.0% decrease (range: 1.9-76.1%); and in the SC group, there was a 16.0% decrease (range: 1.5-45.8%). Conclusions: All the studied therapies caused a statistically significant reduction in the surface area of venous leg ulcers. The best results were observed with the intermittent pneumatic compression, while the radial and focal extracorporeal shockwave therapies appeared less effective. The standard care alone turned out to be the least effective. Our results did not show statistically significant changes in the values of RBC deformability at the investigated shear rates.

Impact of great saphenous vein ablation on healing and recurrence of venous leg ulcers in patients with post-thrombotic syndrome: A retrospective comparative study

BackgroundThe optimal treatment approach for patients with active venous leg ulcers (VLUs) and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) associated with great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux remains unclear. To address this gap, we retrospectively compared the outcomes of patients with post-thrombotic VLU with an intact GSV vs those with a stripped or ablated GSV. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from 48 patients with active VLUs and documented PTS, who were treated at a single center between January 2018 and December 2022. Clinical information, including ulcer photographs, was recorded in a prospectively maintained digital database at the initial and follow-up visits. Two patient groups—group A (with an intact GSV) and group B (with a stripped or ablated GSV)—were compared in terms of time to complete healing, proportion of ulcers achieving complete healing, and ulcer recurrence during the follow-up period. ResultsThere were no significant differences in age, gender, initial ulcer size, or ulcer duration between the two groups. All included patients had femoropopliteal post-thrombotic changes. Group A had significantly more completely healed ulcers (33 of 34 ulcers, 97%) compared with group B (10 of 14 ulcers, 71%) (P = .008). Group A also exhibited a significantly shorter time to complete ulcer healing (median: 42.5 days, interquartile range [IQR]: 65) compared with group B (median: 161 days, IQR: 530.5) (P = .0177), with a greater probability of ulcer healing (P = .0084). Long-term follow-up data were available for 45 of 48 patients (93.7%), with a mean duration of 39.6 months (range: 5.7-67.4 months). The proportion of ulcers that failed to heal or recurred during the follow-up period was significantly lower in group A (9 of 32 ulcers, 27%) compared with group B (11 of 13 ulcers, 85%) (P = .0009). In addition, in a subgroup analysis, patients with an intact but refluxing GSV (12 of 34) had a significantly shorter time to heal (median: 34 days, IQR: 57.25) (P = .0242), with a greater probability of ulcer healing (P = .0091) and significantly fewer recurrences (2 of 12, 16%) (P = .006) compared with group B. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that removal of the GSV through stripping or ablation in patients with post-thrombotic deep venous systems affecting the femoropopliteal segment may result in delayed ulcer healing and increased ulcer recurrence. Patients with an intact GSV had better outcomes, even when the refluxing GSV was left untreated. These findings emphasize the potential impact of GSV treatment on the management of VLUs in individuals with PTS. Further investigation is needed to validate these results and explore alternative therapeutic strategies to optimize outcomes for this patient population.

Satisfactory result of great saphenous vein endovenous laser ablation until below the knee on active venous leg ulcer: a case series

Background Active venous leg ulcer (VLU) is the most severe manifestation of chronic venous disease which not only affects patients’ health, but also decreases the quality of life, and delivers economic burdens. Treatment of superficial venous reflux with early endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) has been associated with reducing ulcer recurrence levels and promoting faster VLU healing. We reported three cases of patients with active VLU undergoing EVLA with different approaches. Case illustration Three patients came with complaint of leg ulcer, diagnosed with C6sEpAsdPr, with venous clinical severity scores (VCSS) of 15, 23, and 22 respectively. Severe great saphenous veins (GSV) reflux was found in all patients by duplex ultrasound examination. The second patient had undergone above-the-knee EVLA. All patients underwent EVLA using 1470-nano meter wavelength laser device and ELVeS radial fiber (Biolitec, Bonn, Germany). The laser energy protocol used was 6 W linear endovenous energy density (LEED) 50 J/cm for proximal until media ATK GSV ablation, 5 W LEED 40 J/cm for media ATK until proximal below-the-knee (BTK) GSV, and 2 W LEED 20 J/cm for proximal until distal BTK GSV. The third patient was also treated with EVLA for small saphenous vein severe reflux. Follow-up until 6 months post-EVLA showed significant healing of the ulcer with 14, 16, and 17 VCSS reduction consecutively without any complication. Conclusion We’ve reported three cases of patients with active VLU undergoing EVLA until BTK with significant results. The EVLA of GSV until BTK where there is still significant reflux is safe and provides satisfactory results in patients with VLU.

A simple index to predict healing in venous leg ulcers: a secondary analysis from four randomised controlled trials.

To investigate whether the use of a simple baseline measurement predicts venous leg ulcer healing at 12 and 24 weeks. This was a secondary analysis of a cohort of four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of treatments adjuvant to compression. Self-reported ulcer duration, and measured ulcer length and width, to calculate estimated ulcer area, were used to obtain a Margolis index score. The score created three prognostic strata for likelihood to heal within 24 weeks, and the number of participants healed and time-to-healing were compared. There were a total of 802 participants across the four RCTs-408 (50.9%) in two 12-week trials and 394 (49.1%) in two 24-week trials. The mean age of participants was 63.7±17.6 years, and 372 were female (46.4%). The Margolis index score at baseline was 0 for 320 participants (predicted normal healing); 1 for 334 participants; and 2 for 148 participants (both 1 and 2 predicted slow-to-heal). Overall, 248 (77.5%) of those participants who scored 0 at baseline healed within 24 weeks, compared with 182 (54.5%) of participants who scored 1, and 30 (20.3%) participants who scored 2. The median time-to-healing was 40 (24-62) days, 57 (35-100) days and 86.5 (56-151) days, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.69 and 0.77, respectively, for the 12 and 24 week trials. A simple baseline index identifies participants with normal or slow-to-heal wounds and could be used to demonstrate prognostic balance between treatment groups in trials. This approach could also be used in clinical practice to assist with managing expectations and for early identification of patients who may best benefit from adjuvant treatments.

A Systematic Review Network Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression on Surgical and Endovenous Interventions for the Treatment of Lower Limb Venous Ulcer Disease.

Venous leg ulcer (VLU) disease constitutes the most severe form of chronic venous insufficiency. We performed a network meta-analysis and meta-regression to investigate the efficacy and safety of the various available interventions in the treatment of VLU. We conducted a systematic research corresponding to the instructions by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement for studies reporting on surgical or endovenous interventions for the treatment of VLU. Following data extraction, we performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis and meta-regression. Primary endpoints included VLU healing and recurrence. The secondary endpoint was postintervention complications. Seventeen studies evaluating the impact of compression monotherapy, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), sclerotherapy, and saphenous vein surgery on VLU treatment, consisting of 2156 patients (2186 VLU) were included. When compared to compression monotherapy, RFA was the only treatment displaying a statistically-significant impact on ulcer healing, odds ratio (OR) 5.80 (95% credibility interval (CI): 1.08-35.07), while EVLA, RR 0.06 (95% CI: 0.00-0.57), sclerotherapy, RR 0.07 (95% CI: 0.00-0.68) and RFA, RR 0.12 (95% CI: 0.01-0.91) were the 3 interventions reducing VLU recurrence. EVLA (SUCRA, 69.65) ranked as the most efficient intervention concerning ulcer recurrence reduction. Regarding postintervention complications, EVLA was the only intervention displaying a statistically-significant increased risk compared to compression monotherapy, RR 14.3 (95% CI: 2.03-172.56). Meta-regression analysis exploring the impact of perforator treatment on VLU failed to predict healing, β = -0.27 (95% CI: -2.55 to 1.85), recurrence, β = -0.02 (95% CI: -2.96 to 2.75) and complication outcomes, β = -0.089 (95% CI: -3.13 to 2.85). During sensitivity analysis, RFA and sclerotherapy failed to sustain their effects on ulcer healing and ulcer recurrence, respectively. In addition, sclerotherapy displayed statistically-significant inferior outcomes compared to both EVLA and RFA regarding ulcer recurrence. This is the first network meta-analysis examining the effect of various interventions on VLU disease. While we have demonstrated the efficacy of RFA and ELVA in ulcer recurrence prevention, our results regarding the impact of RFA and sclerotherapy on VLU healing and recurrence, respectively, should be interpreted with caution. In addition, this review raises questions concerning the value of surgery and perforator interventions in the treatment of VLU. Further research through randomized controlled trials is required. Our review has revealed the significant efficacy of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in effectively reducing the incidence of ulcer recurrence when compared to compression monotherapy. These outcomes hold the potential to provide relevant insights to both medical practitioners and patients, thereby informing a more prudent and enlightened decision-making approach. Such informed decisions, aimed at mitigating the recurring occurrence of venous leg ulcers, carry profound significance given the considerable socioeconomic implications associated with this medical condition.

Endovenous ablation for venous leg ulcers.

Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are a serious manifestation of chronic venous disease affecting up to 3% of the adult population. This typically recalcitrant and recurring condition significantly impairs quality of life, and its treatment places a heavy financial burden upon healthcare systems. The longstanding mainstay treatment for VLUs is compression therapy. Surgical removal of incompetent veins reduces the risk of ulcer recurrence. However, open surgery is an unpopular option amongst people with VLU, and many people are unsuitable for it. The efficacy of the newer, minimally-invasive endovenous techniques has been established in uncomplicated superficial venous disease, and these techniques can also be used in the management of VLU. When used with compression, endovenous ablation aims to further reduce pressure in the veins of the leg, which may impact ulcer healing. To determine the effects of superficial endovenous ablation on the healing and recurrence of venous leg ulcers and the quality of life of people with venous ulcer disease. In April 2022 we searched the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE (including In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid Embase and EBSCO CINAHL Plus. We also searched clinical trials registries for ongoing and unpublished studies, and scrutinised reference lists of relevant included studies as well as reviews, meta-analyses and health technology reports to identify additional studies. There were no restrictions on the language of publication, but there was a restriction on publication year from 1998 to April 2022 as superficial endovenous ablation is a comparatively new technology. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing endovenous ablative techniques with compression versus compression therapy alone for the treatment of VLU were eligible for inclusion. Studies needed to have assessed at least one of the following primary review outcomes related to objective measures of ulcer healing such as: proportion of ulcers healed at a given time point; time to complete healing; change in ulcer size; proportion of ulcers recurring over a given time period or at a specific point; or ulcer-free days. Secondary outcomes of interest were patient-reported quality of life, economic data and adverse events. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for eligibility, extracted data, carried out risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane RoB 1 tool, and assessed GRADE certainty of evidence. The previous version of this review found no RCTs meeting the inclusion criteria. In this update, we identified two eligible RCTs and included them in a meta-analysis. There was a total of 506 participants with an active VLU, with mean durations of 3.1 months ± 1.1 months in the EVRA trial and 60.5 months ± 96.4 months in the VUERT trial. Both trials randomised participants to endovenous treatment and compression or compression alone, however the compression alone group in the EVRA trial received deferred endovenous treatment (after ulcer healing or from six months). There is high-certainty evidence that combined endovenous ablation and compression compared with compression therapy alone, or compression with deferred endovenous treatment, improves time to complete ulcer healing (pooled hazard ratio (HR) 1.41, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.47; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 466 participants). There is moderate-certainty evidence that the proportion of ulcers healed at 90 days is probably higher with combined endovenous ablation and compression compared with compression therapy alone or compression with deferred endovenous treatment (risk ratio (RR) 1.14, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.30; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 466 participants). There is low-certainty evidence showing an unclear effect on ulcer recurrence at one year in people with healed ulcers with combined endovenous treatment and compression when compared with compression alone or compression with deferred endovenous treatment (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.48; I2 = 78%; 2 studies, 460 participants). There is also low-certainty evidence that the median number of ulcer-free days at one year may not differ (306 (interquartile range (IQR) 240 to 328) days versus 278 (IQR 175 to 324) days) following combined endovenous treatment and compression when compared with compression and deferred endovenous treatment; (1 study, 450 participants). There is low-certainty evidence of an unclear effect in rates of thromboembolism between groups (RR 2.02, 95% CI 0.51 to 7.97; I2 = 78%, 2 studies, 506 participants). The addition of endovenous ablation to compression is probably cost-effective at one year (99% probability at GBP 20,000/QALY; 1 study; moderate-certainty evidence). Endovenous ablation of superficial venous incompetence in combination with compression improves leg ulcer healing when compared with compression alone. This conclusion is based on high-certainty evidence. There is moderate-certainty evidence to suggest that it is probably cost-effective at one year and low certainty evidence of unclear effects on recurrence and complications. Further research is needed to explore the additional benefit of endovenous ablation in ulcers of greater than six months duration and the optimal modality of endovenous ablation.

A randomised controlled trial of compression therapies for the treatment of venous leg ulcers (VenUS 6): study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel-group, three-arm randomised controlled trial

BackgroundVenous leg ulcer(s) are common, recurring, open wounds on the lower leg, resulting from diseased or damaged leg veins impairing blood flow. Wound healing is the primary treatment aim for venous leg ulceration, alongside the management of pain, wound exudate and infection.Full (high) compression therapy delivering 40 mmHg of pressure at the ankle is the recommended first-line treatment for venous leg ulcers. There are several different forms of compression therapy available including wraps, two-layer hosiery, and two-layer or four-layer bandages.There is good evidence for the clinical and cost-effectiveness of four-layer bandage and two-layer hosiery but more limited evidence for other treatments (two-layer bandage and compression wraps). Robust evidence is required to compare clinical and cost-effectiveness of these and to investigate which is the best compression treatment for reducing time to healing of venous leg ulcers whilst offering value for money. VenUS 6 will therefore investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of evidence-based compression, two-layer bandage and compression wraps for time to healing of venous leg ulcers.MethodsVenUS 6 is a pragmatic, multi-centre, three-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Adult patients with a venous leg ulcer will be randomised to receive (1) compression wraps, (2) two-layer bandage or (3) evidence-based compression (two-layer hosiery or four-layer bandage).Participants will be followed up for between 4 and 12 months. The primary outcome will be time to healing (full epithelial cover in the absence of a scab) in days since randomisation. Secondary outcomes will include key clinical events (e.g. healing of the reference leg, ulcer recurrence, ulcer/skin deterioration, amputation, admission/discharge, surgery to close/remove incompetent superficial veins, infection or death), treatment changes, adherence and ease of use, ulcer related pain, health-related quality of life and resource use.DiscussionVenUS 6 will provide robust evidence on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the different forms of compression therapies for venous leg ulceration.VenUS 6 opened to recruitment in January 2021 and is currently recruiting across 30 participating centres.Trial registrationISRCTN67321719. Prospectively registered on 14 September 2020

Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy to remove post-thrombotic obstructions and manage post-thrombotic syndrome-associated venous leg ulceration

BackgroundUp to one half of patients with a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis will develop post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Patients with PTS can develop venous leg ulcers (VLUs) due to post-thrombotic obstructions (PTOs) that contribute to prolonged ambulatory venous hypertension. The current treatments for PTS, which include chronic thrombus, synechiae, trabeculations, and inflow lesions, do not target PTOs, and such obstructions can affect stenting success. The aim of the present study was to determine whether removal of chronic PTOs using percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy would promote VLU resolution and positive outcomes. MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, the characteristics and outcomes for patients with VLUs secondary to chronic PTO who were treated using the ClotTriever System (Inari Medical) between August 2021 and May 2022 were assessed. Technical success was considered the ability to cross a lesion and introduce the thrombectomy device. Clinical success was defined as a decrease of ≥1 in the severity category for the ulcer diameter using the revised venous clinical severity score (score 0, no VLU; score 1, mild VLU [size <2 cm]; score 2, moderate VLU [size 2-6 cm]; score 3, severe VLU [size >6 cm]) at the latest follow-up visit. ResultsA total of 11 patients with 15 VLUs on 14 limbs were identified. Their mean age was 59.7 ± 11.8 years, and four patients (36.4%) were women. The median VLU duration was 11.0 months (interquartile range [IQR], 6.0-17.0 months), and 2 patients had VLUs secondary to a deep vein thrombosis event >40 years previously. All treatments were performed in a single session, with technical success achieved in 100% of the 14 limbs. A median of five passes (IQR, four to six passes) with the ClotTriever catheter were performed per limb. Chronic PTOs were successfully extirpated, and intraprocedural intravascular ultrasound showed effective disruption of venous synechiae and trabeculations. Stents were placed in 10 limbs (71.4%). The time to VLU resolution or the latest follow-up was 12.8 ± 10.5 weeks, and clinical success was achieved for all 15 VLUs (100%), with the revised venous clinical severity score for the ulcer diameter improving from a median of 2 (IQR, 2-2) at baseline to a median score of 0 (IQR, 0-0) at last follow-up. The VLU area had decreased by 96.6% ± 8.7%. Of the 15 VLUs, 12 (80.0%) had resolved completely, and 3 had demonstrated near-complete healing. ConclusionsAll patients showed complete or near-complete VLU healing within a few months after mechanical thrombectomy. Mechanical extirpation and interruption of chronic PTOs allowed for luminal gain and restoration of cephalad inflow. With additional investigation, mechanical thrombectomy with the study device could prove a vital component to the treatment of VLUs secondary to PTOs.

The Effect of Standard Compression Adjuvant with a Tailored Exercise Training Program on Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in Treating Adults with Venous Leg Ulcer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Exercise training adjuvant to standard compression is considered to improve calf muscle pump dysfunction in venous leg ulcer (VLU) and subsequent healing. The objectives of this trial were to assess the effectiveness of a tailored exercise training intervention in addition to standard compression therapy on health-related quality of life and anticipating wound healing. Twenty-four VLU participants were recruited and randomly divided into 2 groups. The control group was prescribed conventional compression, and the intervention group received compression plus progressive tailored exercise training. The 14-item chronic venous disease quality of life questionnaire (CIVIQ-14) was used to assess improvement after treatment over time (0, 6, and 12 weeks). Intervention and control groups achieved wound closure for 11 (92%) and 7 (58%) patients. After adjusting for age, sex, and wound size at baseline, the exercise intervention group had 2 times the probability of complete wound healing in 12 weeks than those in the control group (risk ratio = 1.98, 95% CI= 1.01-3.72, P = .047). The primary outcome was the difference in CIVIQ-14 score in 3 dimensions and global index score per visit. The outcomes were evaluated by independent assessors. Demographic, comorbidities, and wound assessments were collected on enrollment. The overall adherence to exercise protocol was 71%. After adjusting age, sex, size of VLU, and CIVIQ score at baseline, the participants in the intervention group had the average global index scores and psychological scores increase at week 12 than those in the control group (21.2; 95% CI= 7.1-35.2, P = .005, and 13.5; 95% CI = 2.9-24.2, P = .044, respectively). Both groups showed similar improvement in the mean change in physical and pain scores within-group over time. Patients with combined conventional compression therapy with exercise training appeared to have a higher quality of life score in psychological and global scores than those with compression therapy alone.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Exercise Therapy For Venous Leg Ulcer Healing and Recurrence

Objective: National guidelines recommend regular exercise for individuals with venous leg ulceration,1 yet data for the effect of exercise on ulcer healing and recurrence are sparse. This study aimed to quantify the evidence for exercise in venous ulcer healing with respect to the primary outcomes of proportion of healed ulcers and rate of ulcer recurrence. Secondary outcomes were improvement in ulcer symptoms, ulcer healing time, quality of life, compliance, and reported adverse events.