HCV-monoinfected Patients Research Articles

Treatment with directly acting antivirals (DAAs) in HCV mono-infected and HIV-HCV co-infected patients

Treatment with directly acting antivirals (DAAs) in HCV mono-infected and HIV-HCV co-infected patients

Real-life effectiveness of antiviral therapy for HCV infection with pangenotypic regimens in HIV coinfected patients

ABSTRACT Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-life efficacy of pangenotypic antivirals in HIV-HCV-positive patients. Research design and methods The analysis included 5650 subjects who were treated with pangenotypic anti-HCV drugs: 5142 were HCV-positive and 508 were HIV-HCV-positive. Results Patients with HCV-monoinfection were older (p < 0.0001), however patients with HCV-monoinfection had a higher proportion of advanced fibrosis F4 (p < 0.0001). There were no differences between the study groups in the rate of SVR12 in ITT-analysis (87,6% versus 93,9% in coinfection and monoinfection group, respectively; p > 0.05). However, there was a difference between study groups in PP-analysis, HIV/HCV and HCV, respectively 95.9% vs 97.9%, p = 0.0323. Additionally, there were a higher rate of patients who did not apply for follow-up (SVR12) in coinfected patients (7,9% vs 3,6% respectively p = 0.0001). In multivariante analysis, factors associated with worse response to the pangenotypic anti-HCV therapy included male sex, HCV genotype 3, stage of fibrosis and decompensation of liver function and HIV coinfection. Conclusions The real-life results of pangenotypic anti-HCV treatment are veryeffective in the group of HIV-HCV-coinfected patients. However, the finaleffectiveness is slightly lower than that obtained in HCV monoinfectedpatients.

Screening and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with advanced fibrosis after hepatitis C virus eradication.

the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after eradication of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) is highly variable in patients with advanced fibrosis (F3). Long-term surveillance for HCC after sustained virological response (SVR) is controversial in these patients. The objective of this study was to describe the post-SVR follow-up in clinical practice in patients with F3 and determine the predictive factors for the development of HCC. a multicenter, observational and retrospective study was performed, which included HCV-monoinfected patients with F3 fibrosis determined by transient elastography who achieved SVR between 2015 and 2022, with follow-up until May 2023. Clinical-demographic, laboratory, elastography, and ultrasound variables were recorded before and after treatment. A descriptive and inferential analysis, Cox regression analysis and survival analysis were carried out with the R statistical software. two hundred and nineteen patients were included in the study (65.3 % males, median age 57 years), and 175 (79.9 %) received ultrasound screening after SVR for 62 (6-90) months. The prescribing service was the only independent variable related to performing ultrasound surveillance (p = 0.004). Eight patients developed HCC. In multivariate analysis adjusted for sex, age, presence of diabetes and alcohol consumption, a post-SVR FIB-4 ≥ 3.25 was associated with a 12-fold increase in HCC risk. The cumulative probability of HCC was higher in the group of patients with FIB-4 ≥ 3.25 after SVR (p < 0.001). post-SVR follow-up of patients with F3 fibrosis is variable in clinical practice. Using the FIB-4 after SVR allows us to identify those patients with a higher risk of HCC who benefit from biannual ultrasound screening.

Response to glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients in clinical practice.

HIV infection has been associated with lower rates of sustained viral response (SVR) with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). There are few data on glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) in HIV/HCV coinfection outside clinical trials. The HEPAVIR-DAA cohort, which recruits HIV/HCV-coinfected patients (NCT02057003) and the GEHEP-MONO cohort (NCT02333292), including HCV-monoinfected individuals, are two concurrent ongoing multicentre cohorts of patients receiving anti-HCV treatment. Patients starting G/P included in those cohorts were analysed. Overall SVR (ITT), discontinuations due to adverse effects, and dropouts were evaluated and compared between both cohorts. Of the 644 patients who started G/P with evaluable SVR, 132 were HIV/HCV coinfected. Overall SVR rates were 487/512 (95.1%) in HCV-monoinfected patients versus 126/132 (95.5%) in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients (P = 1.000). One patient (0.8%) relapsed, and another (0.8%) discontinued treatment due to side effects. SVR to 8 or 12 weeks of treatment with G/P was similar in HIV/HCV-coinfected versus HCV-monoinfected patients. The main reason for not reaching SVR among HIV/HCV-coinfected patients was premature dropout linked to active drug use. G/P in HIV/HCV coinfection was highly effective and tolerable in clinical practice. SVR to 8 or 12 weeks of treatment with G/P was similar in HIV/HCV-coinfected compared with HCV-monoinfected patients but active drug use is still a barrier to reach HCV microelimination.

Effect of Direct Antiviral Therapy Against HCV on CD4+ T Cell Count in Patients with HIV-HCV Coinfection.

HCV-related liver disease is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with HIV infection. It is well known that the response rates to HCV therapy are similar between HCV-monoinfected patients and HIV-HV coinfected ones. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of HCV eradication on CD4 + T cell count in a population of HIV-HCV coinfected patients. We enrolled patients with HIV-HCV coinfection attending the Infectious Diseases Unit of the A.O.U. Federico II of Naples, from January 2016 to February 2019, treated with ART (AntiRetroviral Therapy) and DAAs (Direct Antiviral Agents). For each patient, we evaluated HIV and HCV viral load and CD4+ T cell count before starting therapy with DAAs, by SVR12 time and by SVR48 time. Fibrosis was evaluated by the mean of Fibroscan®. Fifty-two patients were enrolled, 40 males. Fibrosis score was F0-F3 in 15 patients and cirrhosis in the remaining 11 (all in Child-Pugh class A). All had been receiving ART, and all were treated with DAAs. Only patient who had not achieved HIV viral suppression for non-compliance also experienced a relapse of HCV infection after the end of DAAs. In all patients, we observed that the CD4+ T cell count at baseline did not show significant variations compared to SVR12 and SVR48 time. We also assessed CD4 count in relation to HIV categories and stage of liver disease, see Table 1. Also, based on the assessments of the subclasses considered, there were no significant changes in the CD4 + T cell count. Our study shows that HCV viral eradication obtained with DAAs in patients with HIV-HCV coinfection is not associated with significant changes in the CD4 + T cell count, regardless of CDC category and stage of liver disease.

A Comprehensive Hepatitis C Treatment Program—An Observational Study of Collaboration Between Infectious Disease Specialists and General Internal Medicine Provider Serving a Majority Black Population

Background Hepatitis C (HCV) is a global health problem with a significant economic burden. The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy of oral direct acting antiviral HCV treatment in patients managed by infectious disease (ID) specialists and general internal medicine (GM) provider. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study on patients with HCV seen at the ID clinics at an academic medical center (January 2015–March 2021). Patients were managed either exclusively by ID specialists, comanaged by ID and GM practitioner (ID/GM), or independently managed by GM provider. Results A total of 532 patients (median age, 65 years (interquartile range, 58–68 years), 67.3% males, 87.2% Blacks) were seen for HCV treatment. There were 170 HIV-HCV coinfected patients and 362 HCV monoinfected patients. Almost 60% of the patients (n = 318) were seen by ID, 18.6% (n = 99) were comanaged by ID/GM, and 21.6% (n = 115) were seen by GM. Sustained virologic responses at 12 weeks after treatment completion were similar among the patients seen by different providers, 95.9% in ID versus 96.9% in ID/GM versus 100% in GM group (P = 0.33). In the multivariable regression model, sustained virologic response at 12 weeks had no significant association with the type of provider who treated the patients for HCV treatment (P = 0.78). Conclusions These findings support the high efficacy of HCV treatment, irrespective of whether the treatment was administered by ID or GM providers. More primary care providers trained in treating HCV can assist in the expansion of treatment initiatives aimed toward HCV elimination.

PrEP Indications and PrEP Knowledge, Access, and Interest Among Individuals With HCV.

BackgroundIndividuals with hepatitis C (HCV) represent a population that may benefit from pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), given the overlapping risk factors and transmission networks of HCV and HIV. This analysis assesses the prevalence of PrEP indications among individuals with HCV monoinfection and PrEP awareness, interest, and access in this population.MethodsGRAVITY was an observational study for the collection of epidemiologic data from individuals with HCV and/or HIV in Washington DC and Baltimore, with the present analysis limited to HCV-monoinfected patients. The prevalence of PrEP indications was determined using epidemiologic survey responses. Bivariate and multivariable analyses assessed for associations between PrEP indications and PrEP awareness, access, and interest.ResultsAmong 314 HCV-monoinfected participants, 109 (35%) had an indication for PrEP. Forty-eight (44%) had a drug use indication alone, 40 (37%) had a sexual indication alone, and 21 (19%) had both drug use and sexual indications. Eighty-five (27%) participants had heard of PrEP, 32 (10%) had been offered PrEP by a provider, 114 (38%) were interested or maybe interested in PrEP, and 6 (2%) were currently taking PrEP. On bivariate analysis, PrEP awareness was significantly associated with study site (P < .0001), race (P = .0003), age (P < .0001), and sexual PrEP indication (P = .04). However, only study site remained significant (P = .0002) on regression analysis.ConclusionsThough indications for PrEP were prevalent among individuals with HCV in this cohort, most patients were unaware of PrEP, had never been offered PrEP, and were not using PrEP. These data support the need for improved PrEP implementation among people with HCV.

Characterization of the Intestinal Fungal Microbiome in HIV and HCV Mono-Infected or Co-Infected Patients.

Intestinal mycobiome dysbiosis plays an important role in the advancement of HIV- and HCV-infected patients. Co-infection with HCV is an important risk factor for exacerbating immune activation in HIV-infected patients, and gut fungal microbial dysbiosis plays an important role. However, no systematic study has been conducted on the intestinal fungal microbiome of HIV/HCV co-infected patients to date. Patients infected with HIV and HCV, either alone or in combination, and healthy volunteers were included. Stool samples were collected for fungal ITS sequencing and for further mycobiome statistical analysis. We found that the abundance of fungal species significantly decreased in the HIV/HCV co-infection group compared to in the healthy control group, while no significant differences were found in the mono-infection groups. Low-CD4 + T-cell patients in the HIV group and high-ALT-level patients in the HCV group were discovered to have a more chaotic fungal community. Furthermore, the opportunistic pathogenic fungal profiles and fungal inter-correlations in the co-infection group became less characteristic but more complicated than those in the mono-infection groups. Intestinal fungal dysregulation occurs in HIV- and HCV-infected patients, and this dysregulation is further complicated in HIV/HCV co-infected patients.

Impact of HIV-1 Infection on the Natural Progress of an Anti-HCV Positive Population in an Impoverished Village in China from 2009 to 2017.

Our study aimed to determine the impact of HIV coinfection on the natural progression of liver disease in treatment-naive HCV-infected patients. From 2009 to 2017, we tracked non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis and end-stage liver disease (ESLD)-associated mortality among HCV mono-infected and HIV/HCV coinfected patients in an impoverished village in China. The study cohort consisted of 355 HBsAg-negative and anti-HCV (+) or anti-HIV (+) patients recruited in July 2009, 164 of whom were diagnosed with HIV-1 infection. The surviving patients were re-evaluated in August 2017. During the follow-up, the disease status, liver biochemical, and non-invasive indicators of liver fibrosis (APRI and FIB-4) were measured. The transaminases ALT and AST were significantly higher in HIV-positive HCV resolvers (HIV+ HCVr) than in HIV-negative HCV resolvers (HCVr) (p = 0.019 and p < 0.0001, respectively). APRI and FIB-4 scores of HIV-positive chronic HCV carriers (HIV+ HCVc) were significantly higher than in HIV-negative chronic HCV carriers (HCVc) (p < 0.001). Similarly, APRI and FIB-4 scores were higher in the HIV+ HCVr group than in the HCVr group (ps < 0.001). From 2009 to 2017, the levels of ALT (p = 0.006), AST (p = 0.003), APRI (p = 0.015), and FIB-4 (p = 0.025) were significantly elevated in the HIV/HCV coinfected patients with CD4+ T counts below 500 cells/l. ESLD-related mortality was significantly greater in HIV/HCV-infected cases than in HCV mono-infected patients (73.3% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.009) among patients (n = 45) who died between 2009 and 2017 during follow-up. These findings suggest a higher risk of ESLD-related death and rapid progression of liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV coinfected individuals compared with HCV mono-infected patients. During HIV/HCV coinfection, HIV infection may aggravate HCV-associated liver injury.

Utility of On-Treatment Viral Loads During Treatment With Direct-Acting Antivirals in Patients Infected With Chronic Viral Hepatitis C.

Background: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents have revolutionized the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Current data regarding the utility of on-treatment HCV viral load (VL) monitoring are conflicting and limited data are available in HIV-coinfected patients. Objective: The objective of the study was to determine whether on-treatment VLs are predictive of HCV cure in a real-world population. Method: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted using patients who received a prescription for DAA therapy for HCV treatment at a large, tertiary ambulatory care clinic. Results: A total of 219 patients were included in the final analysis. The average age was 56 years. Most patients were male (64.4%), African American (73.1%), and insured by Medicaid (61.6%). Most patients were treatment-naive, noncirrhotic, and infected with HCV genotype 1a (73.1%). About 22.4% of patients were coinfected with HIV. The most common regimen was 12 weeks of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (53.9%). On-treatment VLs were most commonly obtained at treatment week 4 (42.5%), of which 45.2% of patients were detectable. Sustained virologic response (SVR) was achieved in 96.8% of the total population and 95.9% of HIV-coinfected patients. Of the 7 patients who did not achieve SVR, 3 patients had undetectable on-treatment VLs in the first 8 weeks of therapy. Conclusion: Sustained virologic response rates were similar between HCV-monoinfected patients and HCV-HIV-coinfected patients. This research further supports that on-treatment VLs may not be a valuable indicator of treatment failure but may be helpful to engage patients in care and ensure treatment adherence and ultimately cure.

Negative impact of HIV infection on broad-spectrum anti-HCV neutralizing antibody titers in HCV-infected patients with advanced HCV-related cirrhosis.

The current study aimed to assess the impact of HIV on the production of anti-HCV antibodies in HCV-infected individuals with advanced HCV-related cirrhosis before and 36 weeks after the sustained virological response (SVR) induced by direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) therapy. Prospective study on 62 patients (50 HIV/HCV-coinfected and 12 HCV-monoinfected). Plasma anti-E2 and HCV-nAbs were determined respectively by ELISA and microneutralization assays. At baseline, the HCV-group had higher anti-E2 levels against Gt1a (p=0.012), Gt1b (p=0.023), and Gt4a (p=0.005) than the HIV/HCV-group. After SVR, anti-E2 titers against Gt1a (p<0.001), Gt1b (p=0.001), and Gt4a (p=0.042) were also higher in the HCV-group than HIV/HCV-group. At 36 weeks post-SVR, plasma anti-E2 titers decreased between 1.3 and 1.9-fold in the HIV/HCV-group (p<0.001) and between 1.5 and 1.8-fold in the HCV-group (p≤0.001). At baseline, the HCV-group had higher titers of HCV-nAbs against Gt1a (p=0.022), Gt1b (p=0.002), Gt2a (p<0.001), and Gt4a (p<0.001) than the HIV/HCV-group. After SVR, HCV-nAbs titers against Gt1a (p=0.014), Gt1b (p<0.001), Gt2a (p=0.002), and Gt4a (p=0.004) were also higher in the HCV-group. At 36 weeks post-SVR, HCV-nAbs decreased between 2.6 and 4.1-fold in the HIV/HCV-group (p<0.001) and between 1.9 and 4.0-fold in the HCV-group (p≤0.001). HIV/HCV-coinfected patients produced lower levels of broad-spectrum anti-HCV antibodies than HCV-monoinfected patients.

Pangenotypic and Genotype-Specific Antivirals in the Treatment of HCV Genotype 4 Infected Patients with HCV Monoinfection and HIV/HCV Coinfection.

The introduction of the direct-acting antivirals (DAA) has substantially improved the effectiveness of the therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. We aimed to compare the efficacy of pangenotypic and genotype-specific DAA in the cohort of genotype (GT) four patients with HCV monoinfection and HIV coinfection. A total of 662 GT4-infected patients treated in 2015–2020—of whom 168 (25.3%) were coinfected with HIV, selected from the retrospective EpiTer-2 database—were enrolled in the analysis. Among HIV-coinfected patients, 54% (90) were treated with genotype-specific regimens and 46% (78) with pangenotypic options, while among HCV-monoinfected patients, the rates were 72% and 28%, respectively. Significantly higher rate of males (67.9% vs. 57.7%, p = 0.01), a lower rate of liver cirrhosis (10.2% vs. 18.1%, p = 0.02), and higher of treatment-naïve patients (87.5% vs. 76.7%, p = 0.003) were documented in the HIV coinfected population. The overall sustained virologic response after exclusion of non-virologic failures was achieved in 98% with no significant difference between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients, 96.2% vs. 98.5%, respectively. While the genotype-specific regimens resulted in a similar cure rate regardless of the HIV status, the pangenotypic options were more efficacious in patients with HCV monoinfection (99.3% vs. 94.4%, p = 0.05). Hereby, we demonstrated the high effectiveness and good safety profile of the DAA therapy in the population of HCV GT4 infected patients with HIV coinfection supporting the current recommendations to treat HCV/HIV coinfected patients with the same options as those with HCV monoinfection.

Baseline Plasma Metabotype Correlates With Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy Nonresponse for HCV in HIV-HCV Coinfected Patients.

Introduction: With the advent of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for HCV, the cure is achieved at similar rates among HIV–HCV coinfected patients as in HCV mono-infected patients. The present study evaluates host plasma metabolites as putative indicators in predicting the treatment response in baseline HIV–HCV patients. Methods: Non-cirrhotic HIV–HCV (N = 43) coinfected patients were treated with sofosbuvir and daclatasvir for 12 weeks. Plasma metabolite profiling of pre- and post-therapy was analyzed in 20/43 patients. Of the 20 selected, 10 (50%) attained the sustained viral response [(SVR) (responders)] as defined by the absence of HCV RNA at 12 weeks after the treatment, and 10 (50%) did not attain the cure for HCV (nonresponders). Results: A total of 563 features were annotated (metabolomic/spectral databases). Before therapy, 39 metabolites differentiated (FC ±1.5, p < 0.05) nonresponders from responders. Of these, 20 upregulated and 19 downregulated were associated with tryptophan metabolism, nicotinamide metabolism, and others. Post therapy, 62 plasma metabolites (12 upregulated and 50 downregulated, FC±1.5, p < 0.05) differentiated nonresponders from responders and highlighted a significant increase in the steroid and histidine metabolism and significant decrease in tryptophan metabolism and ascorbate and pyruvate metabolism in the nonresponders. Based on random forest and multivariate linear regression analysis, the baseline level of N-acetylspermidine (FC > 2, AUC = 0.940, Bfactor = −0.267) and 2-acetolactate (FC > 2, AUC = 0.880, Bfactor = −0.713) significantly differentiated between nonresponders from responders in HIV–HCV coinfected patients and was able to predict the failure of treatment response. Conclusion: Increased baseline levels of N-acetylspermidine and 2-acetolactate levels are associated with the likeliness of failure to attain the cure for HCV in HIV–HCV coinfected patients.

CCR5+ T-Cells Homed to the Liver Exhibit Inflammatory and Profibrogenic Signatures in Chronic HIV/HCV-Coinfected Patients.

Liver fibrosis is accelerated in patients coinfected with hepatitis C virus and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), compared with HCV monoinfected patients, although the underlying mechanisms are unknown. We hypothesize that T cells expressing the HIV co-receptor, chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5), preferentially migrate to the inflamed liver and contribute to enhanced fibrogenesis. We compared the peripheral and intrahepatic CCR5 expression on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in 21 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with 14 chronic HCV monoinfected patients. Using 12-color flow cytometry, phenotypic and functional characterization of CCR5+ and negative cells pre- and post-stimulation with HCV genotype specific overlapping pooled peptides was conducted. Patients with HIV/HCV coinfection had significantly more CD4+CCR5+ and CD8+CCR5+ T cells in the liver as compared with peripheral blood (p = 0.0001 for both). Compared with patients with HCV monoinfection, patients with HIV/HCV coinfection also had fewer peripheral CD4+CCR5+ and CD8+CCR5+ T cells (p = 0.02, p = 0.001 respectively), but more intrahepatic CD4+CCR5+ and CD8+CCR5+ cells (p = 0.0001 for both). Phenotypic analysis of CCR5+ sorted cells demonstrated an increased expression of markers of exhaustion, senescence, immune activation and liver homing (PD1, CD57, CD38, HLADR, and CXCR3). Post-stimulation with HCV peptides, CCR5+ T cells secreted more proinflammatory and profibrogenic cytokines and chemokines rather than antiviral cytokines. Phenotypic and functional analyses of CCR5+ T cells in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients revealed a pathogenic role for CCR5+ T cells in hepatic fibrogenesis. These cells are functionally proinflammatory, pro-fibrogenic and preferentially accumulate in liver, accelerating fibrosis. These findings suggest that targeting CCR5 may be a therapeutic strategy for be ameliorating liver fibrosis.

HDV Seroprevalence in HBsAg-Positive Patients in China Occurs in Hotspots and Is Not Associated with HCV Mono-Infection.

HDV infection causes severe liver disease, the global health burden of which may be underestimated due to limited epidemiological data. HDV depends on HBV for infection, but recent studies indicated that dissemination can also be supported by other helper viruses such as HCV. We used a rapid point-of-care test and an ELISA to retrospectively test for antibodies against the Hepatitis Delta antigen (anti-HDV-Ab) in 4103 HBsAg-positive and 1661 HBsAg-negative, anti-HCV-positive sera from China and Germany. We found that the HDV seroprevalence in HBsAg-positive patients in China is limited to geographic hotspots (Inner Mongolia: 35/251, 13.9%; Xinjiang: 7/180, 3.9%) and high-risk intravenous drug users (HBV mono-infected: 23/247, 9.3%; HBV-HCV co-infected: 34/107, 31.8%), while none of the 2634 HBsAg carriers from other metropolitan regions were anti-HDV-Ab-positive. In Germany, we recorded an HDV seroprevalence of 5.3% in a university hospital environment. In a cohort of HBsAg-negative, anti-HCV-positive patients that were not exposed to HBV before (anti-HBc-negative), HDV was not associated with HCV mono-infection (Chinese high-risk cohort: 0/365, 0.0%; German mixed cohort: 0/263, 0.0%). However, 21/1033 (2.0%) high-risk HCV patients in China with markers of a previously cleared HBV infection (anti-HBc-positive) were positive for anti-HDV-Ab, with two of them being positive for both HDV and HCV RNA but negative for HBV DNA. The absence of anti-HDV-Ab in HCV mono-infected patients shows that HCV cannot promote HDV transmission in humans.

Direct, indirect and total effect of HIV coinfection on the risk of non-liver-related cancer in hepatitis C virus-infected patients treated by direct-acting antivirals: a mediation analysis.

HIV-coinfected patients experience higher incidences of non-liver-related cancers than HCV-monoinfected patients. Chronic inflammation, immunosuppression, but also higher tobacco or alcohol consumption and metabolic dysregulation could explain this higher risk. We aimed to estimate the direct, indirect and total effects of HIV coinfection on the risk of non-liver-related cancers in HCV participants treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). Up to four HCV-monoinfected participants from the ANRS CO22 HEPATHER cohort were matched by age and sex to HIV/HCV-coinfected participants from the ANRS CO13 HEPAVIH cohort. Participants were followed from DAA initiation until the occurrence of a non-liver-related cancer. Counterfactual mediation analysis was carried out to estimate the direct (chronic inflammation and immunosuppression), indirect (tobacco and alcohol consumption and metabolic syndrome) and total effect of HIV coinfection on the risk of non-liver-related cancers. 548 HIV/HCV-coinfected and 2016monoinfected participants were included. Overall, HIV coinfection was associated with a 3.7-fold [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7-7.0] higher risk of non-liver-related cancers in HCV participants. This increased risk was explained by significant direct effect [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.7-6.6] but not indirect effect (HR = 1.1, 95% CI: 0.8-1.5) of HIV coinfection. In HCV participants treated with DAAs, the direct effect of HIV coinfection, reflecting chronic inflammation and immunosuppression, was associated with a 3.7-fold higher risk of non-liver-related cancer. By contrast, the indirect effect of HIV coinfection, reflecting higher tobacco and alcohol consumption and metabolic dysregulation, was not significantly associated with the risk of non-liver-related cancers.

Hepatitis C continuum of care: Experience of integrative hepatitis C treatment within a human immunodeficiency virus clinic in Indonesia.

Direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) have changed the paradigm of hepatitis C therapy for both HCV/HIV co-infected and HCV mono-infected patients. We aimed to describe the HCV continuum of care of HIV-infected patients treated in an HIV clinic after a free DAA program in Indonesia and identify factors correlated with sofosbuvir-daclatasvir (SOF-DCV) treatment failure. We did a retrospective cohort study of adult HIV/HCV co-infected patients under routine HIV-care from November 2019 to April 2020 in the HIV integrated clinic of Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia. We evaluated some factors correlated with sofosbuvir-daclatasvir treatment failure: gender, diabetes mellitus, previous IFN failure, cirrhosis, concomitant ribavirin use, high baseline HCV-RNA, and low CD4 cell count. Overall, 640 anti-HCV positive patients were included in the study. Most of them were male (88.3%) and former intravenous drug users (76.6%) with a mean age of 40.95 (SD 4.60) years old. Numbers and percentages for the stages of the HCV continuum of care were as follows: HCV-RNA tested (411; 64.2%), pre-therapeutic evaluation done (271; 42.3%), HCV treatment initiated (210; 32.8%), HCV treatment completed (207; 32.2%), but only 178 of these patients had follow-up HCV-RNA tests to allow SVR assessment; and finally SVR12 achieved (178; 27.8%). For the 184 who completed SOF-DCV treatment, SVR12 was achieved by 95.7%. In multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus remained a significant factor correlated with SOF-DCV treatment failure (adjusted RR 17.0, 95%CI: 3.28-88.23, p = 0.001). This study found that in the HCV continuum of care for HIV/HCV co-infected patients, gaps still exist at all stages. As the most commonly used DAA combination, sofosbuvir daclatasvir treatment proved to be effective and well-tolerated in HIV/HCV co-infected patients. Diabetes mellitus was significant factor correlated with not achieving SVR12 in this population.

Late presentation of chronic hepatitis C patients in the era of direct-acting antivirals-Data from the German Hepatitis C-Registry.

Late presentation for care in chronic viral hepatitis has been estimated to occur in approximately 25% of patients initiating treatment with direct acting antivirals. We evaluated the extent of late presentation since the implementation of direct acting antivirals and established differences between HCV monoinfected and HIV/HCV coinfected patients. The German Hepatitis C Registry is a multicenter non-interventional registry study. We analysed patients enrolled between 02/2014 and 12/2018. Advanced liver disease was defined as an aspartate aminotransferase to platelet-ratio-index score ≥ 1.5, a FibroScan ≥ 9.5 kPa or a METAVIR stage ≥ F3. HCV monoinfected and HIV/HCV coinfected patients were analysed separately and baseline characteristics of both subgroups were compared. 8003 treatment naive patients were analysed. Overall, 2197/8003 (28%) patients presented late for care (HCV monoinfection: 2067/7452 (28%); HIV/HCV coinfection: 130/551 (24%)). Late presentation decreased comparing the year 2014 to the years 2015 (p≤0.001), 2017 (p≤0.001) and 2018 (p≤0.001) and was significantly lower in 2018 in HIV/HCV coinfected patients compared to HCV monoinfected patients (HIV/HCV: 15/89 (17%) vs. 415/1566 (27%); p=0.047). We observed a significant decrease of late presentation from 2014 to 2018. Despite the decrease during the observation period, approximately one in four patients continued to be affected in 2018, with a lower proportion of late presentation being seen in patients coinfected with HIV/HCV. This trend might indicate effects of a closer linkage to care and a more frequent detection of acute HCV infections of HIV+ patients.

Indications and waiting list priority for deceased donor liver transplantation in HIV/HCV co-infected hemophilic patients in Japan through contaminated blood product.

HIV/HCV co-infection from blood products for hemophilia has been a social problem in Japan. Liver transplantation (LT) is an important treatment option for hepatic failure and cirrhosis of the liver in co-infected patients, and appropriate indications for LT, especially organ form deceased donors, are required by society. The aim is to propose priority status for the waiting list for deceased donor (DD) LT in HIV/HCV co-infected patients in Japan based on medical and scientific considerations. Since 2009, we have been working on the subject in research projects under grants-in-aid for health and labour sciences research on AIDS measures provided by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (the Kanematsu project and Eguchi project). Our research showed that hepatic fibrosis is advanced in HIV/HCV co-infected Japanese patients, especially those with hemophilia who became infected from blood products at a faster rate than HCV mono-infected patients. In addition, those patients who developed portal hypertension had a poor prognosis at a young age. The results of our research contributed to increasing the priority score of those patients on the deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) waiting list in 2013 and to establishing a scoring system for DDLT corresponding to the Model for End-stage Liver disease (MELD) score in 2019. This paper introduces changes in priority and the current state of priority of the DDLT waiting list for HIV/HCV co-infected patients in Japan.

Clinical Relevance of Torque Teno Virus (TTV) in HIV/HCV Coinfected and HCV Monoinfected Patients Treated with Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy.

Torque Teno virus (TTV) is a ubiquitous virus that causes chronic infection in humans with unknown clinical consequences. Here, we investigated the influence of TTV infection on HCV direct-acting antiviral (DAA) efficacy in HIV/HCV coinfected and HCV monoinfected patients as controls. Of 92 study patients, 79.3% were TTV DNA positive; untreated patients exhibited a significantly higher proportion of TTV DNA-positivity vs. sustained virological response (SVR) patients (100.0% vs. 65.2%, p < 0.001), while TTV positivity was not significant in DAA failure patients vs. SVR patients despite HIV/HCV coinfection. TTV DNA viral load was higher among HCV monoinfected patients vs. HIV/HCV coinfected, although marginally significant (p = 0.074) and no significant viral load difference was detected between DAA failures and SVR patients, while untreated vs. SVR patients had a significantly higher viral load (19,884, IQR 5977–333,534, vs. 469, IQR 10–4124, p = 0.004). Alpha-genogroup 3 TTV was the most prevalent genetic group, and no specific strain or genogroup was observed in relapser patients. Among HIV/HCV patients with HCV RNA detectable at end of treatment (EOT), TTV DNA was detected in 9/17 treatment responder patients and 3/5 relapser patients, thus, TTV infection does not appear to influence the control HCV viremia after EOT. Levels of IL-6 IL-4, and CD14 were not significantly different between TTV PCR-positive and -negative patients. These results suggest no association between TTV DNA positivity or viral load and HCV DAA failure whether patients were HIV/HCV coinfected or HCV monoinfected.