Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index Research Articles

Navigating 'grey areas' and challenges during evaluation of transplant eligibility in specific myelofibrosis populations: a perspective on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT.

Significant efforts have been made to effectively select myelofibrosis (MF) patients who can benefit from allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), the only current cure for MF. The recent EBMT/ELN 2024 recommendations offer valuable guidance for hematologists and transplant physicians. However, several grey areas remain in day-to-day clinical practice regarding the feasibility and optimal preparation for transplantation in patients with this disease. Effective spleen size reduction, often achieved with JAK inhibitors, appears crucial for transplant success. For resistant cases, switching JAK inhibitors, splenectomy, or spleen irradiation may be considered, taking into account patient profiles, treatment availability and center preferences. Managing splanchnic vein thromboses, portal, and pulmonary hypertension is critical as these conditions may affect transplant outcomes. Cytopenias, particularly transfusion-dependent anemia and thrombocytopenia, complicate treatment and impact on outcomes, though new drugs show promise. Comorbidities play a significant role and tools like the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) and frailty assessments are useful for evaluating transplant risks while allowing the implementation of corrective measures. Especially in low- and medium-income countries where access to novel therapies may be challenging, allo-HCT still represents an attractive therapeutic option for MF. Future directions include integrating new therapeutics into the transplant algorithm and leveraging artificial intelligence for more informed risk assessment, highlighting the need for tailored approaches to improve allo-HCT outcomes in such a setting.

Midostaurin added to 10-day decitabine, for patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy with AML and higher risk MDS, irrespective of FLT3 mutational status, does not improve outcome.

The treatment of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) considered unfit for receiving intensive chemotherapy is challenging. Based on the hypothesis that addition of the broad tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) midostaurin could improve the response to hypomethylating agents, irrespective of FLT3 gene mutational status, we conducted a randomized phase II multicenter study to assess the tolerability and efficacy of the addition of midostaurin to a 10-day schedule of decitabine in unfit (i.e. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) ≥ 3) AML and higher risk myelodysplasia (MDS) patients (HOVON155 trial). In total, 140 eligible patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to treatment with 10-days of decitabine alone (N = 70) or combined with midostaurin (50mg bid;starting the day following the last dose of decitabine), (N = 70). Addition of midostaurin was well tolerated and the number of AEs was comparable for both treatment arms. Early death rates (< 30 days) were similar as well (10%). In the decitabine plus midostaurin arm 24% reached CR/CRi, the median OS was 4.8 months and 1-yrs OS was 31% which compared with 34% CR/CRi, median OS of 7.4 months and 1-yrs OS of 37% for the decitabine alone group (NS). Thus, while the addition of midostaurin appears safe, it does not enhance therapeutic efficacy of decitabine in unfit AML patients.

A novel prognostic scoring system for AML patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with real world validation

ObjectivesThis study aims to develop a robust predictive model for survival in AML patients undergoing allo-HSCT. MethodsIt was performed a retrospective analysis of 336 AML patients who underwent allo-HSCT at Peking University First Hospital between September 2003 and March 2023. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival. A predictive model was developed based on multivariable analysis results. Internal validation was carried out through bootstrap resampling, and the model’s performance was assessed using the Concordance Index (C-index), Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve, calibration plots, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). ResultsOur prognostic model, which includes age, disease stage, donor/recipient gender, mononuclear cell counts, and the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI), effectively stratified patients into low-risk and high-risk groups. The two groups showed significant differences in overall survival (P<0.0001), disease-free survival (P<0.0001), non-relapse mortality (NRM) (P<0.0001), and relapse rates (P=0.08). The model achieved a C-index of 0.71. Calibration plots and DCA confirmed strong alignment between predicted and observed outcomes. Subgroup analysis revealed that overall survival was significantly lower in the high-risk group compared to the low-risk group in both measurable residual disease (MRD) negative and MRD positive subgroups (P=0.015 for both). ConclusionThe developed prognostic model, which integrates comprehensive disease and patient characteristics, enhances risk stratification for AML patients undergoing allo-HSCT. This model effectively stratifies risk in both MRD-negative and MRD-positive subgroups and may facilitate more informed MRD-based treatment decisions.

Global characteristics and outcomes of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A study of the worldwide network for blood and marrow transplantation (WBMT).

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) is a commonly used treatment in multiple myeloma (MM). However, real-world global demographic and outcome data are scarce. We collected data on baseline characteristics and outcomes from 61 725 patients with newly diagnosed MM who underwent upfront AHCT between 2013 and 2017 from nine national/international registries. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), relapse incidence (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Median OS amounted to 90.2 months (95% CI 88.2-93.6) and median PFS 36.5 months (95% CI 36.1-37.0). At 24 months, cumulative RI was 33% (95% CI 32.5%-33.4%) and NRM was 2.5% (95% CI 2.3%-2.6%). In the multivariate analysis, superior outcomes were associated with younger age, IgG subtype, complete hematological response at auto-HCT, Karnofsky score of 100%, international staging scoring (ISS) stage 1, HCT-comorbidity index (CI) 0, standard cytogenetic risk, auto-HCT in recent years, and use of lenalidomide maintenance. There were differences in the baseline characteristics and outcomes between registries. While the NRM was 1%-3% at 12 months worldwide, the OS at 36 months was 69%-84%, RI at 12 months was 12%-24% and PFS at 36 months was 43%-63%. The variability in these outcomes is attributable to differences in patient and disease characteristics as well as the use of maintenance and macroeconomic factors. In conclusion, worldwide data indicate that AHCT in MM is a safe and effective therapy with an NRM of 1%-3% with considerable regional differences in OS, PFS, RI, and patient characteristics. Maintenance treatment post-AHCT had a beneficial effect on OS.

Pediatric adapted risk index to predict 2-year transplant-related mortality post-HSCT in children

AbstractSeveral attempts have been made to optimize pretransplant risk assessment to improve hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) decision-making and to predict post-HSCT outcomes. However, the relevance of pretransplant risk assessment to the pediatric population remains unclear. We report the results of revalidation of the hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI) in 874 children who received 944 HSCTs for malignant or nonmalignant diseases at a single center. After finding the HCT-CI invalid in our patient population, we proposed a modified pediatric adapted scoring system that captures risk factors (RFs) and comorbidities (CoMs) relevant to pediatrics. Each RF/CoM was assigned an integer weight based on its hazard ratio (HR) for transplant-related mortality (TRM): 0 (HR < 1.2), 1 (1.2 ≥ HR < 1.75), 2 (1.75 ≥ HR < 2.5), and 3 (HR ≥ 2.5). Using these weights, the pediatric adapted risk index (PARI) for HSCT was devised, and patients were divided into 4 risk groups (group 1: without RF/CoM; group 2: score 1-2; group 3: score 3-4; and group 4: score ≥5). There was a linear increase in 2-year TRM from group 1 to 4 (TRM, 6.2% in group 1, 50.9% in group 4). PARI was successfully validated on an internal and external cohort of pediatric patients. Comparing models using c-statistics, PARI was found to have better performance than HCT-CI in predicting 2-year TRM in children, with Akaike and Schwarz Bayesian information criteria values of 1069.245 and 1073.269, respectively, using PARI, vs 1223.158 and 1227.051, respectively, using HCT-CI. We believe that PARI will be a valuable tool enabling better counseling and decision-making for pediatric patients with HSCT.

Total Body Irradiation and Fludarabine with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Mismatched Related or Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the sole curative treatment for most patients with hematologic malignancies. A well-matched donor (related or unrelated) remains the preferred donor for patients undergoing allogeneic HCT; however, a large number of patients rely on alternative donor choices of mismatched related (haploidentical) or unrelated donors to access HCT. In this retrospective study, we investigated outcomes of patients who underwent mismatched donor (related or unrelated) HCT with a radiation-based myeloablative conditioning MAC regimen in combination with fludarabine, and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as higher-intensity graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. We retrospectively assessed HCT outcomes in 155 patients who underwent mismatched donor HCT (related/haploidentical versus unrelated [MMUD]) with fractionated-total body irradiation (fTBI) plus fludarabine and PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis at City of Hope from 2015 to 2021. Diagnoses included acute lymphoblastic leukemia (46.5%), acute myelogenous leukemia (36.1%), and myelodysplastic syndrome (6.5%). The median age at HCT was 38 years, and 126 patients (81.3%) were an ethnic minority. The Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index was ≥3 in 36.1% of the patients, and 29% had a Disease Risk Index (DRI) of high/very high. The donor type was haploidentical in 67.1% of cases and MMUD in 32.9%. At 2 years post-HCT, disease-free survival (DFS) was 75.4% and overall survival (OS) was 80.6% for all subjects. Donor type did not impact OS (hazard ratio [HR], .72; 95% confidence interval [CI], .35 to 1.49; P = .37) and DFS (HR, .78; 95% CI, .41 to 1.48; P = .44), but younger donors was associated with less grade III-IV acute GVHD (HR, 6.60; 95% CI, 1.80 to 24.19; P = .004) and less moderate or severe chronic GVHD (HR, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.70 to 7.34; P < .001), with a trend toward better survival (P = .099). The use of an MMUD was associated with significantly faster neutrophil recovery (median, 15 days versus 16 days; P = .014) and platelet recovery (median, 18 days versus 24 days; P = .029); however, there was no difference in GVHD outcomes between the haploidentical donor and MMUD groups. Nonrelapse mortality (HR, .86; 95% CI, .34 to 2.20; P = .76) and relapse risk (HR, .78; 95% CI, .33 to 1.85; P = .57) were comparable in the 2 groups. Patient age <40 years and low-intermediate DRI showed a DFS benefit (P = .004 and .029, respectively). High or very high DRI was the only predictor of increased relapse (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.32 to 6.34; P = .008). In conclusion, fludarabine/fTBI with PTCy was well-tolerated in mismatched donor HCT, regardless of donor relationship to the patient, provided promising results, and increased access to HCT for patients without a matched donor, especially patients from ethnic minorities and patients of mixed race.

A Tender Reduced-Intensity Conditioning for the Unfit: A Novel 4 Gy Total Body Irradiation-Based Conditioning Followed by Two-Step Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplant, Results of a Prospective Trial

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) remains the only potentially curative treatment for many hematologic malignancies (HM). We previously developed a two-step approach that separates the lymphoid and myeloid portions of the graft, allowing a consistent T cell dosing and sparing the stem cells from the effect of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (CY). The two-step approach demonstrated safety and efficacy in patients treated with myeloablative and reduced-intensity conditioning. Here, we extended our two-step platform to older and less fit patients and explored the effects of using a high dose of T cells on disease relapse and transplant outcomes. Thirty-four patients with HM were treated. Median age was 68 years old and included a minority population constituting 32%. Eighty-two percent had a hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index score ≥3. Ninety-one percent were haploidentical, and the rest were matched-related donor HSCT. Following administration of fludarabine and 2 Gy total body irradiation (TBI) (13 patients) or 4 Gy TBI (21 patients) conditioning regimen, a fixed dose of 2 × 108/kg CD3+ T cells was given, followed 2 days later by CY, then infusion of CD34-selected stem cells. Overall survival (OS) was 70% at 1 year and 48% at 3 years. The cumulative incidence (CI) of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse were 22% and 33% at 3 years. However, the CI of relapse was much lower for patients treated with 4 Gy TBI versus those treated with 2 Gy TBI (11% versus 54%, P = .045), while NRM was similar (23% versus 15%, P = .399). This contributed to a high OS of 64% in patients who received 4 Gy TBI-based conditioning at 3 years, with median OS not reached, although this was not statistically significant (P = .68). The median time to neutrophil and platelet recovery was 12 and 17 days, respectively. The CI of grade II acute graft-versus-host-disease (aGVHD) was 22% and 26% at 100 days and 6 months, respectively. The CI of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 7.5% at 3 years. There was no grade III or IV aGVHD, no severe cGVHD, and no deaths attributable to GVHD. In conclusion, the two-step approach HSCT demonstrated a low disease relapse rate and high survival in patients treated with 4 Gy TBI-based conditioning, despite a generally older and more medically compromised patient population.

Advances in second hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a widely used treatment for malignant hematological diseases; however, some patients inevitably experience relapse. Therefore, for patients who relapse after the first HSCT (HSCT1), a standard treatment regimen must be developed. A second hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT2) is a possible treatment option. Several studies have analyzed the feasibility of HSCT2. Previous studies have shown that various factors may affect the efficacy of HSCT2, including the hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index, duration of remission after HSCT1, occurrence of chronic graft-versus-host disease, and disease status before HSCT2. However, the selection of donors for HSCT2 does not affect the transplantation efficacy. HSCT2 also presents a risk of relapse, and the prognosis of patients after relapse is poor. Further research on the treatment of patients after relapse is warranted.

The predictive value of HCT-CI and CCI comorbidity indices in predicting survival and mortality before allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute leukemia patients: A single-centre experience

Objective: Acute leukemia often involves comorbidities, impacting treatment decisions and patient outcomes. Clinicians commonly use the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) to assess their influence. However, their effectiveness in predicting survival and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in acute leukemia patients under 65 undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains unclear. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis on adults diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The study included 35 patients, comprising 16 AML and 19 ALL cases. Patients were categorized based on age-adjusted HCT-CI and CCI scores. Results: The 2-year NRM rate was determined to be 51.4%. Statistical analysis found no significant associations between age-adjusted CCI (p=0.217) and age-adjusted HCT-CI (p=0.102) with NRM. However, median overall survival significantly varied based on risk levels (p=0.003), HCT-CI groups (p=0.009), and CCI groups (p=0.011). Conclusion: Using age-adjusted HCT-CI and CCI for comorbidity scoring in initial assessment of acute leukemia patients and those under 65 shows promise. However, these indices were ineffective in predicting NRM, emphasizing the importance of considering other significant pre-transplant factors like genetic risk, conditioning regimens, and donor type.

Impact of body mass index and karyotype on clinical outcomes in adolescents and young adults (AYA) with acute myeloid leukemia.

6551 Background: Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) represents 15%–20% of leukemias in children and approximately 33% in adolescents and young adults (AYA) (1). Obesity has been associated with worse outcome in acute lymphoblastic leukemia in AYA patients (pts). To date, however, the relationship between weight and clinical outcomes in AYA pts diagnosed with AML has not been established. We investigated the impact of body mass index (BMI) along with other prognostic factors on outcomes of AYA AML pts receiving intensive chemotherapy and/or allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT). Methods: This retrospective chart review included pts 18-39 yrs newly diagnosed with AML between 01/2006-12/2023. All pts received intensive chemotherapy with cytarabine- and anthracycline-based induction followed by consolidation chemotherapy +/- SCT. BMI was calculated using height and weight at AML diagnosis. Pts were classified by BMI into under, normal, overweight, or obese categories. AML risk classification (ELN 2022) and HCT co-morbidity index (HCT-CI) were performed. Outcomes included complete response (CR), CR with incomplete counts (CRi), overall response rates (CR+CRi), event free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Eighty-seven pts (median age 25 yrs, range 18-38) were identified. 44 (51%) were male; 85% were Caucasian. Per ELN 2022, 27 (31%) had favorable, 40 (46%) intermediate, and 20 (23%) adverse risk. Overall response rate to chemotherapy was 92% (CR 80%, CRi 12%). CR rate by ELN was 96%, 72% and 58%, respectively. Median OS for all pts was 788 days and per ELN risk was 1379, 569, and 595 days, respectively. Co-morbidity indices (HCT-CI) ranged from 0-5. Sixty-two percent underwent SCT. 29% relapsed. The percentage of pts alive at 2 and 5 years was 54% and 29%. Pts were categorized by BMI: underweight (BMI &lt; 18.5, 6%), normal weight (NW) (BMI 18.5-24.9) (37%), overweight (OW)(BMI 25-29, 26%), and obese (OB) (BMI &gt; 30, 31%) pts. Overall, there was a trend to improved outcomes in NW vs OW and OB pts. Median OS was 1006 (NW) vs 748 (OW) vs 678 (OB) days (p=0.0036 for NW vs OW/OB). Two-year OS was 63%, 52%, and 48%; 5-year OS was 38%, 26%, and 19%. The impact of BMI was dependent on AML karyotype. In favorable risk AML AYA pts, the relapse rate was 4%, 4% and 12%. Median OS was 1982 (NW), 1169 (OW), and 1256 (OB) days (p=0.0525 NW vs OW/OB). Five-year OS was 50%, 25% and 18%. The most common causes of death were GVHD-induced multi-organ failure and respiratory failure which did not correlate with HCT-CI. In intermediate and adverse risk AML, there was no difference in outcomes by BMI. Conclusions: Outcomes of favorable risk AYA AML pts following intensive chemotherapy +/- SCT was influenced by BMI with increased mortality and shorter OS in pts with high BMI (overweight and obese) as compared to normal BMI. Additional studies to confirm this finding and elucidate the underlying reasons are warranted.

Significance of absolute neutrophil count before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with aplastic anemia.

The impact of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) before allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) on the outcomes for patients with aplastic anemia (AA) remains unclear. We retrospectively evaluated the relationship between ANC before transplantation and patient outcomes, involving 883 adult Japanese patients with AA who underwent allogeneic HSCT as their first transplantation between 2008 and 2020. Patients were divided into three groups based on ANC: 0/µL (n = 116); 1-199 (n = 210); and ≥ 200 (n = 557). In the low ANC groups (ANC < 200), patient age was higher, previous anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) treatments were infrequent, duration from diagnosis to transplantation was shorter, hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index (HCT-CI) was higher, ATG-based conditioning was used infrequently, and peripheral blood stem cell from related donor and cord blood were used frequently. In multivariate analysis, patient age, previous ATG treatment, HCT-CI, stem cell source, and ANC before transplantation were significantly associated with 5-year overall survival (OS) ("ANC ≥ 200": 80.3% vs. "ANC 1-199": 71.7% vs. "ANC 0": 64.4%). The cumulative incidence of bacterial infection, invasive fungal disease, and early death before engraftment were significantly higher in the low ANC groups. Among patients with ANC of zero before transplantation, younger patient age, shorter duration from diagnosis to transplantation, HCT-CI of 0, and bone marrow from related donor as stem cell source were significantly associated with better OS. Consequently, ANC before allogeneic HSCT was found to be a significant prognostic factor in adult patients with AA. Physicians should pay attention to ANC before transplantation.

Prognostic impact of the conditioning intensity on outcomes after allogeneic transplantation for MDS with low blasts: a nationwide retrospective study by the adult MDS working group of the Japan Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.

Poor prognostic factors, such as transfusion dependency and chromosomal risk, need to be considered in the indication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for patients harboring myelodysplastic syndromes with less than 5% marrow blasts (MDS-Lo). We analyzed the post-transplant outcomes of 1229 MDS-Lo patients who received myeloablative (MAC)(n = 651), reduced-intensity (RIC)(n = 397), and non-myeloablative conditioning (NMAC) regimens (n = 181). The multivariate analysis revealed that the RIC group had better chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)- and relapse-free survival (CRFS) (P = 0.021), and GVHD- and relapse-free survival (GRFS) than the MAC group (P = 0.001), while no significant differences were observed between the NMAC and MAC groups. In the subgroup analysis, the MAC group has better overall survival (P = 0.008) than the RIC group among patients with an HCT-comorbidity index (HCT-CI) score of 0, while the RIC group had better overall survival (P = 0.029) than the MAC group among those with an HCT-CI score ≥3. According to the type of conditioning regimen, total body irradiation 12 Gy-based MAC regimen showed better OS and CRFS than the other MAC regimen, and comparable outcomes to the RIC regimen. In conclusion, the RIC and NMAC regimens are promising options for MDS-Lo patients in addition to the MAC regimen.

The Impact of Pretransplant Respiratory Virus Detection on Posttransplant Outcomes in Children Undergoing Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Pretransplant respiratory virus (RV) infections have been associated with negative transplant outcomes in adult hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. In the era of HCT delay because of high-risk RVs, we examined the impact of pretransplant RV detection on transplant outcomes in pediatric HCT recipients. This retrospective cohort study included pediatric myeloablative allogeneic HCT recipients from 2010 to 2019. All patients were screened for RV at least once within 90 days before HCT using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR), regardless of symptoms. Posttransplant outcomes included days alive and out of hospital and progression to lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). Among 310 patients, 134 had an RV detected in the 90 days before HCT. In univariable analysis, transplant factors including younger age, total body irradiation, umbilical cord blood transplantation, lymphocyte count <100/mm3, HCT comorbidity index score ≥3, and viral factors including symptomatic infection, human rhinovirus as a virus type, and symptomatic pretransplant upper respiratory tract infection were associated with fewer days alive and out of hospital. In multivariable analysis, transplant factors remained significant, but not viral factors. There was a higher incidence of progression to posttransplant LRTI with the same pretransplant RV if the last positive PCR before HCT was ≤30 days compared with >30 days (P = .007). In the setting of recommending HCT delay for high-risk RVs, symptomatic upper respiratory tract infection, including human rhinovirus infections, may lead to increased duration of hospitalization and early progression to LRTI when transplantation is performed within 30 days of the last positive PCR test.

Treosulfan- Versus Busulfan-based Conditioning in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Single-center Retrospective Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study

Treosulfan has shown promise in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for its myeloablative properties and low toxicity. In this single-center retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study we compared treosulfan- and busulfan-based conditioning in allogeneic HCT for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). This study included 138 adults who underwent allogeneic HCT for MDS or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) at Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto 2015-2022. Using propensity score matching, we compared transplant outcomes between two well-matched cohorts who received conditioning with either fludarabine-treosulfan (FT) (n=46) or fludarabine-busulfan with total body irradiation (FBT200) (n=92). A scoring system based on patient age, Karnofsky performance score and hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index was used to assign patients based on fitness to low-dose (30 g/m2) or high-dose (42 g/m2) treosulfan: 32 (69.6%) received high-dose treosulfan. The racial composition of the two groups was similar, with 27.2% and 21.7% of FBT200 and FT recipients, respectively, identifying as non-Caucasian (P=0.61). Primary outcomes were analyzed at a median follow-up of 747 days. Of all participants, 116 (84.0%) received graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) . Patients who received FT had a superior 2-y overall survival (OS) compared to those who received FBT200: 66.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 46.1-81.2) vs. 44.5% (95% CI: 34-54.4), hazards ratio (HR): 0.43, 95% CI: 0.22-0.84 (P=0.013). In multivariate analysis (MVA), only the use of fresh grafts (P=0.02) and FT (P=0.01) were associated with improved OS. FT was associated with superior 2-y relapse-free survival (RFS) compared to FBT200: 63.1% (95% CI: 42.6-77.9) vs. 39.1% (95% CI: 29.1-49.1), HR: 0.44 (95% CI: 0.24-0.81), P=0.008. In MVA, the use of fresh grafts (P=0.03) and FT (P=0.009) were associated with improved RFS. Recipients of FT demonstrated superior 2-y graft versus host disease relapse-free survival (GRFS) compared to those who received FBT200: 57.4% (95% CI: 37.8-72.8) vs. 35.1% (95% CI: 25.5-45). In MVA, only FT was associated with superior GRFS (P=0.02). FT recipients exhibited markedly superior 1-y event-free survival (EFS) compared to recipients of FBT200 in univariate analysis (40.3% (95% CI: 25.9-54.2) vs. 9.2% (95% CI: 4.4-16.3), HR: 0.47 (95%CI: 0.30-0.72), P<0.001) and MVA (P=0.004). FT was associated with lower 1-y non-relapse mortality (NRM) compared to FBT200 in univariate analysis (9.9% (95% CI: 3.0-21.8) vs. 29.7% (95% CI: 20.6-39.3), HR: 0.41 (95% CI: 0.17-0.96), P=0.04) and MVA (P=0.04). Our study utilized propensity score matching to demonstrate superiority of treosulfan- over busulfan-based conditioning in stem cell transplantation of patients with MDS and is the first to evaluate the performance of treosulfan-based conditioning in combination with ATG and PTCY. As such, it contributes to the increasing body of evidence supporting the safety of treosulfan, even at the dose of 42 g/m2.

Nephrons and non-relapse mortality: simplified comorbidity index and acute kidney injury are associated with NRM in adults undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant.

The Simplified Comorbidity Index (SCI) is a recently published 5-component, pre-transplant tool to predict non-relapse mortality (NRM) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) patients. The SCI captures chronic kidney disease (CKD) using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on the CKD-EPI equation (KDIGO 2021 CKD-EPI), which may be more sensitive to predict risk of NRM than the creatinine cut-off in the 16-component, Hematopoietic Cell Transplant-Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI). We retrospectively assessed the ability of the SCI to risk-stratify patients and the impact of acute kidney injury (AKI) to NRM in adults who underwent alloHCT at the University of Minnesota. We included 373 patients who underwent their first alloHCT between 2015 and 2019. Through multivariate analysis, we found that patients with an SCI of greater than 4 had a higher risk of NRM. Additionally, we noted that AKIs stages 2-3 prior to day +100 was independently associated with a 3-fold greater NRM than patients who did not experience clinically significant AKI.

Treosulfan (Trecondyv)

&#x0D; CADTH recommends that Trecondyv in combination with fludarabine should be reimbursed by public drug plans as part of conditioning treatment before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) at increased risk for standard conditioning therapies if certain conditions are met.&#x0D; Trecondyv in combination with fludarabine should only be covered to treat adult patients with AML or MDS who are eligible for alloHSCT, are at least 50 years old at transplant, and/or have a Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Comorbidity Index score greater than 2. Patients should have good performance status.&#x0D; Trecondyv should only be reimbursed in combination with fludarabine if prescribed by clinicians with appropriate training and experience in transplant centres with alloHSCT programs and if the cost of Trecondyv is not more than the least costly alternative conditioning treatment.&#x0D;

Development and Validation of a Concise Objectifiable Risk Evaluation Score for Non-Relapse Mortality after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

We aimed to develop a concise objectifiable risk evaluation (CORE) tool for predicting non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). A total of 1120 adult patients who had undergone allo-HCT at our center between 2013 and 2020 were divided into training, first, and second validation cohorts. Objectifiable, patient-related factors impacting NRM in univariate and multivariate analyses were: serum albumin, serum creatinine, serum C-reactive protein (CRP), heart function (LVEF), lung function (VC, FEV1), and patient age. Hazard ratios were assigned points (0–3) based on their impact on NRM and summed to the individual CORE HCT score. The CORE HCT score stratified patients into three distinct low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups with two-year NRM rates of 9%, 22%, and 46%, respectively, and OS rates of 73%, 55%, and 35%, respectively (p &lt; 0.001). These findings were confirmed in a first and a second recently treated validation cohort. Importantly, the CORE HCT score remained informative across various conditioning intensities, disease-specific subgroups, and donor types, but did not impact relapse incidence. A comparison of CORE HCT vs. HCT Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) in the second validation cohort revealed better performance of the CORE HCT score with c-statistics for NRM and OS of 0.666 (SE 0.05, p = 0.001) and 0.675 (SE 0.039, p &lt; 0.001) vs. 0.431 (SE 0.057, p = 0.223) and 0.535 (SE 0.042, p = 0.411), respectively. The CORE HCT score is a concise and objectifiable risk evaluation tool for adult patients undergoing allo-HCT for malignant disease. External multicenter validation is underway.

Impact of Frailty on Outcomes after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

The literature is limited regarding outcomes in older adults and frail patients receiving BCMA-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Here we describe the safety and efficacy of CAR-T in these clinically important subgroups treated in a real-world setting. Frailty was defined as a frail score ≥2 using the simplified frailty index (score based on age + Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] Performance Status + Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index [HCT-CI]). Of the 136 patients analyzed (age range, 41 to 81 years), 83 (61%) were considered frail at the time of CAR-T infusion. Compared to the nonfrail group, the frail group had higher proportions of patients with renal insufficiency (18% versus 6%), high-risk cytogenetics (45% versus 35%), extramedullary disease (51% versus 43%), and ECOG Performance Status ≥2 (18% versus 2%), and worse HCT-CI (3 versus 1). Although patients in the frail group had a higher incidence of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) (39% versus 17%), the incidences of all- grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS), as well as high-grade CRS and ICANS, were similar in the 2 groups. With a median follow-up of 7 months, the median progression-free survival was 6.9 months in the frail group versus 11.1 months in the nonfrail group (P = .028). The median overall survival was 14 months in the frail group and was not reached in the nonfrail group (P = .025). This study highlights the tolerable safety and reasonable efficacy of CAR-T for frail myeloma patients in a real-world practice. Although the frail patients did not experience any excessive high-grade toxicities, they did have inferior efficacy outcomes.

Analysis of risk factors for fatal renal complications after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Various complications can influence hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes. Renal complications can occur during the early to late phases of HCT along with various factors. However, studies focusing on fatal renal complications (FRCs) are scarce. Herein, we analyzed 36,596 first allogeneic HCT recipients retrospectively. Overall, 782 patients died of FRCs at a median of 108 (range, 0-3,440) days after HCT. The cumulative incidence of FRCs was 1.7% and 2.2% at one and five years, respectively. FRCs were associated with older age, male sex, non-complete remission (non-CR), lower performance status (PS), and HCT comorbidity index (HCT-CI) associated with renal comorbidity in multivariate analysis. The risk factors within 100 days included older age, multiple myeloma, PS, and HCT-CI comorbidities (psychiatric disturbance, hepatic disease, obesity, and renal disease). Older age and male sex were risk factors between 100 days and one year. After one year, HCT-CI was associated with the presence of diabetes and prior solid tumor; total body irradiation was identified as a risk factor. Non-CR was a common risk factor in all three phases. Furthermore, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, reactivation of cytomegalovirus, and relapse of underlying disease also affected FRCs. Systematic follow-up may be necessary based on the patients' risk factors and post-HCT events.

Impact of stem cell selection between bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cells for unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies: on behalf of the Donor/Source Working Group of the Japanese Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Background aimsThis study aimed to comprehensively assess the impact of stem cell selection between bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) in unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for hematological malignancies. Our objective was to identify specific factors associated with better transplant outcomes. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the Japanese HSCT registry. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 0–70 years who underwent their first unrelated HSCT with BM or PB, with an 8/8 or 7/8 allele HLA match for hematological malignancies between 2010 and 2020. ResultsAmong 10 295 patients, no significant difference was observed in overall survival, relapse, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) or non-relapse mortality between the groups. Patients who received PB showed no clear difference in acute GVHD but had a greater rate of chronic GVHD, resulting in poor chronic GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (CRFS). Subgroup analyses highlighted the importance of patient-specific factors in source selection. Patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and a greater hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index showed better CRFS and GRFS when BM was the preferred source. Similar trends were observed among patients with standard-risk disease for CRFS. However, no such trends were evident among patients aged 0–24 years, indicating that both sources are viable choices for young patients. ConclusionsThis real-world retrospective analysis showed similar basic outcomes for BM and PB in an unrelated setting. The results support that BM may still be preferred over PB, especially when the long-term quality of life is a major concern. A consideration of individual factors can further optimize transplant success. Further research is warranted to explore the long-term implications of stem cell source selection.