Event-free Survival Hazard Ratio Research Articles

Randomized Phase III SIERRA Trial of 131I-Apamistamab Before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Versus Conventional Care for Relapsed/Refractory AML

PURPOSE Older patients with relapsed or refractory AML (RR AML) have dismal prognoses without allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). SIERRA compared a targeted pretransplant regimen involving the anti-CD45 radioconjugate 131I-apamistamab with conventional care. METHODS SIERRA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02665065 ) was a phase III open-label trial. Patients age ≥55 years with active RR AML were randomly assigned 1:1 to either an 131I-apamistamab–led regimen before alloHCT or conventional care followed by alloHCT if initial complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) occurred. Initial response was assessed 28-56 days after alloHCT in the 131I-apamistamab group and 28-42 days after salvage chemotherapy initiation; patients without CR/CRp or with AML progression could cross over to receive 131I-apamistamab followed by alloHCT. The primary end point was durable complete remission (dCR) lasting 180 days after initial CR/CRp. Secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS), assessed hierarchically in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. RESULTS The ITT population included 153 patients (131I-apamistamab [n = 76]; conventional care [n = 77]). In total, 44/77 conventional care arm patients crossed over and 40/77 (52%) received 131I-apamistamab and alloHCT, with six patients (13.6%) experiencing a dCR. In the ITT population, the dCR rate was significantly higher with 131I-apamistamab (17.1% [95% CI, 9.4 to 27.5]) than conventional care (0% [95% CI, 0 to 4.7]; P < .0001). The OS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.70 to 1.41; P = .96), and the EFS HR was 0.23 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.34), with HR <1 favoring 131I-apamistamab. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 59.7% and 59.2% of the 131I-apamistamab and conventional care groups, respectively. CONCLUSION The 131I-apamistamab–led regimen was associated with a higher dCR rate than conventional care in older patients with RR AML. 131I-apamistamab was well tolerated and could address an unmet need in this population.

Abstract PO4-20-03: HIPEx: Adjuvant palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in ER-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer with high recurrence score according to GenesWellTM BCT; a multi-center single arm phase II clinical trial (KCSG BR 19-13)

Abstract Background: In estrogen receptor (ER)-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer (EBC) patients, NCCN treatment guideline recommend 21-gene tests for decision of adjuvant chemotherapy if tumor size is over 0.5cm or node positive disease. In addition, GenesWellTM BCT is a prognostic assay that predict the risk of recurrence in patients with ER-positive HER2-negative and nodal stage 0-1 EBC. According to gene tests, EBC patients with high recurrence risk would have help from adjuvant chemotherapy to increase the rate of disease free survival but toxicities of chemotherapy are not negligible. Therefore, the effort for escaping adjuvant chemotherapy has been performed and currently CDK4/6 inhibitor would be considered as the substitute for cytotoxic chemotherapy in ER-positive HER2-negative EBC patients. Methods: HIPEx trial is a multi-center, phase II clinical trial to determine the efficacy of adjuvant palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in ER-positive HER2-negative EBC with high recurrence score according to GenesWellTM BCT (NCT04247633). Eligible patients are women who received curative surgery and diagnosed as ER-positive, HER2-negative and pathologic stage T1b-T2 and/or N0-1. Clinical recurrence risk is high according to the modified Adjuvant! Online guideline and GenesWellTM BCT score is 4 or more which being genomic high risk. Other criteria include ECOG performance status ≤1, adequate organ functions and availability of an archival surgical specimens. Patients receive palbociclib 125mg once daily for 21 days of 28-day cycle plus tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor (anastrozole, letrozole or exemestane) once daily for every day. Palbociclib would be taken for two years and endocrine therapy for five years or more. If adjuvant radiotherapy is required, palbociclib should be taken two weeks after the end date of radiotherapy. If patients are premenopausal status, GnRH agonist is allowed. Primary endpoint is 3-year event free survival (EFS) rate of high clinical and genetic risk ER-positive EBC. Secondary endpoints include 3-year overall survival, quality of life, safety and tolerability of palbociclib with endocrine therapy as an adjuvant setting, exploratory analysis of predictive and prognostic biomarkers and the performance of GenesWellTM BCT for 3-year EFS rate. In total, 578 patients would be enrolled in this trial. Based on the previous results of GenesWell™ BCT in Korea, the 3-year EFS rate for the past control group (chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy) is 87.0% and the treatment group in this clinical trial is assumed to be 90.5%.(hazard ratio for EFS = 0.717). Null hypothesis is the 3year-EFS rate in patients received adjuvant palbociclib and endocrine therapy is not less than that of the past control group. Alternative hypothesis is the 3year-EFS rate of this trial is less than that of the past control group (one-sided). Significance level is 0.025, power is 0.80. Considering 10% drop out rate, 4-years of accrual patient enrollment and 3-years of follow up period, 578 patients were required in this clinical trial. Citation Format: Ji-Yeon Kim, Sung Hoon Sim, Jieun Lee, In Hae Park, Kyong Hwa Park, Seock-Ah Im, Jee Hung Kim, Kyoung Eun Lee, Jeong Eon Lee, Jai Min Ryu, Young Kee Shin, Yeon Hee Park. HIPEx: Adjuvant palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in ER-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer with high recurrence score according to GenesWellTM BCT; a multi-center single arm phase II clinical trial (KCSG BR 19-13) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-20-03.

Prediction of 5-year overall survival of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma on the pola-R-CHP regimen based on 2-year event-free survival and progression-free survival.

This study aimed to predict the 5-year overall survival (OS) benefit of pola-R-CHP versus R-CHOP in the POLARIX trial based on the 2-year event-free survival (EFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We identified randomized controlled trials (RCT) published before 31 May 2023. The correlation between the logarithmic (log) hazard ratio (HR) for EFS (HREFS) or PFS (HRPFS) and the HR for OS (HROS) was estimated at the trial-level. Correlation analysis was performed between 2-year PFS or EFS and 5-year OS rates at the treatment arm-level. Linear regression models were used to calculate the 5-year OS of pola-R-CHP and R-CHOP. In the included 20 RCTs, a linear correlation between HREFS (r = 0.765) or HRPFS (r = 0.534) and HROS was observed at the trial- level. Two-year EFS (r = 0.918) or 2-year PFS (r = 0.865) correlated linearly with 5-year OS. Linear regression analysis between 2-year EFS/PFS and 5-year OS gave estimated 5-year OS rates between pola-R-CHP and R-CHOP of 6.4% and 6.3%, respectively. Two-year EFS and PFS are feasible early endpoints in patients with DLBCL treated primarily with immunochemotherapy. The pola-R-CHP regimen is expected to improve 5-year OS.

Outcomes in progressive systemic sclerosis treated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation compared with combination therapy.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has been shown to improve long-term survival for early diffuse progressive SSc compared with CYC. CYC, however, does not provide a long-term benefit in SSc. The combination of MMF and rituximab is a potent alternative regimen. We aimed to retrospectively compare the outcomes of SSc patients who underwent AHSCT to patients who met the eligibility criteria for AHSCT but received upfront combination therapy with MMF and rituximab. Repeated assessments of modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS), forced vital capacity (FVC), and diffusing capacity (DLCO) values were conducted. Clinical improvement was defined as an mRSS decrease >25% or an FVC increase >10%. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined in the absence of persistent major organ failure or death. Twenty-one SSc patients in the combination therapy group were compared with 16 in the AHSCT group. Age, sex and disease duration were similar between the two groups. Clinical improvement at 12 months was seen in 18 (86%) patients in the combination group compared with 13 (81%) in the AHSCT group (P = 0.7). The hazard ratio for EFS at 24 months favoured the combination group (HR = 0.09, P = 0.04). During follow-up, both groups exhibited a significant and comparable reduction in mRSS and an increase in FVC values at each time interval up to 24 months. MMF and rituximab compared with AHSCT in SSc patients eligible for AHSCT resulted in similar skin and lung clinical improvement with a better safety profile at 24 months.

Prognostic and Therapeutic Utility of Variably Expressed Cell Surface Receptors in Osteosarcoma

Background Six cell surface receptors, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (Her-2), platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β (PDGFR-β), insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R), insulin receptor (IR), c-Met, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 (VEGFR-3), previously demonstrated variable expression across varying patient-derived and standard osteosarcoma (OS) cell lines. The current study sought to validate previous expression patterns and evaluate whether these receptors offer prognostic and/or therapeutic value. Methods Patient-derived OS cell lines (n = 52) were labeled with antibodies to Her-2, PDGFR-β, IGF-1R, IR, c-Met, and VEGFR-3. Expression was characterized using flow cytometry. The difference in geometric mean fluorescent intensity (geoMFIdiff = geoMFIpositive − geoMFInegative) was calculated for each receptor across all cell lines. Receptor expression was categorized as low (Q1), intermediate (Q2, Q3), or high (Q4). The event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival for the six cell surface receptors were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Differences in hazard for EFS event and overall survival event for patients in each of the three expression levels in each of the six cell surface receptors were assessed using the log-rank test. Results All 6 receptors were variably expressed in the majority of cell lines. IR and PDGFR-β expressions were found to be significant predictors for EFS amongst patients with nonmetastatic disease (p=0.02 and 0.01, respectively). The hazard ratio for EFS was significantly higher between high IR and intermediate IR expression (HR = 2.66, p=0.02), as well as between high PDGFR-β and intermediate PDGFR-β expression (HR = 5.68, p=0.002). Her-2, c-Met, IGF-1R, and VEGFR-3 were not found to be significant predictors for either EFS or overall survival. Conclusion The six cell surface receptors demonstrated variable expression across the majority of patient-derived OS cell lines tested. Limited prognostic value was offered by IR and PDGFR-β expression within nonmetastatic patients. The remaining receptors do not provide clear prognostic utility. Nevertheless, their consistent, albeit variable, surface expression across a large panel of patient-derived OS cell lines maintains their potential use as future therapeutic targets.

Quizartinib in FLT3-ITD-Mutated Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: QuANTUM-R Trial Results

Abstract Background FLT3-ITD mutations occur in about 25% of patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and are associated with poor outcomes. Pts with relapsed/refractory (R/R) FLT3-ITD AML have worse prognosis and high unmet medical need. Quizartinib (Q) is a potent and selective FLT3i with promising activity and a manageable safety profile. QuANTUM-R was a global, phase 3, randomized trial of Q vs chemotherapy (SC) in pts with R/R FLT3-ITD AML (NCT02039726). Methods Pts with R/R FLT3-ITD AML w/wo hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) were randomized to receive Q or a preselected investigator choice SC: low-dose cytarabine; mitoxantrone, etoposide, and intermediate-dose cytarabine (MEC); or fludarabine, cytarabine, and G-CSF with idarubicin (FLAG-IDA). Prior midostaurin was allowed. Pts receiving HSCT after Q could resume Q after HSCT. Primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS), respectively. Exploratory endpoints included response rate, time to and duration of response, and transplant rate. Results 367 pts were randomized; 245 to Q and 122 to SC. Median follow-up was 23.5 mo. OS hazard ratio (HR) of Q relative to SC was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.58-0.98; P=.0177). Median OS was 6.2 (95% CI, 5.3-7.2) vs 4.7 (95% CI, 4.0-5.5) mo in Q and SC arms, respectively. EFS HR was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.70-1.16; P=.1071); median EFS was 1.4 (95% CI, 0.0-1.9) vs 0.9 (95% CI, 0.4-1.3) mo, respectively. Sensitivity analyses and OS subgroup analyses supported Q vs SC. Composite complete response (CRc) was 48% and 27% in Q and SC arms, respectively. Transplant rate was 32% (Q) and 12% (SC). Median time to first CRc was 4.9 wk for Q. The most common grade ≥ 3 TEAEs in both arms were infections and those associated with cytopenia. Conclusion OS benefit was observed with single-agent Q vs SC in pts with R/R FLT3-ITD AML with a favorable Q safety profile, providing evidence of meaningful clinical benefit in pts with limited treatment options.

Prognostic significance of the EVI1 gene expression in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a meta-analysis.

Ecotropic virus integration site-1 (EVI1) is frequently expressed in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Many studies have reported the potential poor prognostic impact of EVI1 higher expression (EVI1H) in the AML patients; however, the conclusions previously reported have not been fully assessed and are still controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic significance of EVI1H in patients with AML. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the event-free survival (EFS) was selected as the secondary endpoint. We extracted the hazard ratio (HR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) for the OS and EFS from the multivariate COX proportional hazard models. A total of 4767 AML patients from 11 studies up to 23 February 2019 were subjected to our meta-analysis. Pooled HRs suggested that EVI1H had an adverse impact on OS (HR = 1.52, 95%CI 1.24-1.86) and EFS (HR = 1.41, 95%CI 1.14-1.74) in AML patients. EVI1H was also associated with a shorter OS (HR = 1.73, 95%CI 1.43-2.11) and EFS (HR = 1.17, 95%CI 1.05-1.31) in AML patients with the intermediate cytogenetic risk (ICR) according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), European leukemia network (ELN), or International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN). Furthermore, EVI1H appeared to be a poor prognosis indicator in patients with normal cytogenetics (NC) (HR for OS:2.01, 95%CI 1.32-3.05; HR for EFS 1.54, 95%CI 1.09-2.17) and young patients (HR for OS 1.30, 95%CI 1.09-1.55), respectively. This meta-analysis indicates EVI1H has an independent and significantly adverse prognostic impact on AML patients in the entire population, and this conclusion same applies to some subgroups like AML patients with ICR, NC, and young AML patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Single-Agent Quizartinib (Q), a Potent and Selective FLT3 Inhibitor (FLT3i), in Patients (pts) with FLT3-Internal Tandem Duplication (FLT3-ITD)-Mutated Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Enrolled in the Global, Phase 3, Randomized Controlled Quantum-R Trial

Efficacy and Safety of Single-Agent Quizartinib (Q), a Potent and Selective FLT3 Inhibitor (FLT3i), in Patients (pts) with FLT3-Internal Tandem Duplication (FLT3-ITD)-Mutated Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Enrolled in the Global, Phase 3, Randomized Controlled Quantum-R Trial

A Randomized Phase II Open-Label Multi-Institution Study of the Combination of Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Compared to Sorafenib in the First-Line Treatment of Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Objectives: To investigate the clinical efficacy and tolerability of the combination of bevacizumab (B) and erlotinib (E) compared to sorafenib (S) as first-line treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: A total of 90 patients with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh class A–B7 cirrhosis, and no prior systemic therapy were randomly assigned (1: 1) to receive either 10 mg/kg B intravenously every 14 days and 150 mg E orally daily (n = 47) (B+E) or 400 mg S orally twice daily (n = 43). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included event-free survival (EFS), objective response rate based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), time to progression, and safety and tolerability. Results: The median OS was 8.55 months (95% CI: 7.00–13.9) for patients treated with B+E and 8.55 months (95% CI: 5.69–12.2) for patients receiving S. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.57–1.47). The median EFS was 4.37 months (95% CI: 2.99–7.36) for patients receiving B+E and 2.76 months (95% CI: 1.84–4.80) for patients receiving S. The HR for EFS was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.42–1.07; p = 0.09), favoring B+E over S. When OS was assessed among patients who were Child-Pugh class A, the median OS was 11.4 months (95% CI: 7.5–15.7) for patients treated with B+E (n = 39) and 10.26 months (95% CI: 5.9–13.0) for patients treated with S (n = 38) (HR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.53–1.46). Conclusions: There was no difference in efficacy between the B+E and S arms, although the safety and tolerability profile tended to favor B+E over S based on competing risk analysis.

Association of Minimal Residual Disease With Clinical Outcome in Pediatric and Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Minimal residual disease (MRD) refers to the presence of disease in cases deemed to be in complete remission by conventional pathologic analysis. Assessing the association of MRD status following induction therapy in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with relapse and mortality may improve the efficiency of clinical trials and accelerate drug development. To quantify the relationships between event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) with MRD status in pediatric and adult ALL using publications of clinical trials and other databases. Clinical studies in ALL identified via searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, and clinicaltrials.gov. Our search and study screening process adhered to the PRISMA Guidelines. Studies that addressed EFS or OS by MRD status in patients with ALL were included; reviews, abstracts, and studies with fewer than 30 patients or insufficient MRD description were excluded. Study sample size, patient age, follow-up time, timing of MRD assessment (postinduction or consolidation), MRD detection method, phenotype/genotype (B cell, T cell, Philadelphia chromosome), and EFS and OS. Searches of PubMed and MEDLINE identified 566 articles. A parallel search on clinicaltrials.gov found 67 closed trials and 62 open trials as of 2014. Merging results of 2 independent searches and applying exclusions gave 39 publications in 3 arms of patient populations (adult, pediatric, and mixed). We performed separate meta-analyses for each of these 3 subpopulations. The 39 publications comprised 13 637 patients: 16 adult studies (2076 patients), 20 pediatric (11 249 patients), and 3 mixed (312 patients). The EFS hazard ratio (HR) for achieving MRD negativity is 0.23 (95% Bayesian credible interval [BCI] 0.18-0.28) for pediatric patients and 0.28 (95% BCI, 0.24-0.33) for adults. The respective HRs in OS are 0.28 (95% BCI, 0.19-0.41) and 0.28 (95% BCI, 0.20-0.39). The effect was similar across all subgroups and covariates. The value of having achieved MRD negativity is substantial in both pediatric and adult patients with ALL. These results are consistent across therapies, methods of and times of MRD assessment, cutoff levels, and disease subtypes. Minimal residual disease status warrants consideration as an early measure of disease response for evaluating new therapies, improving the efficiency of clinical trials, accelerating drug development, and for regulatory approval. A caveat is that an accelerated approval of a particular new drug using an intermediate end point, such as MRD, would require confirmation using traditional efficacy end points.

Prognostic nutritional index as apredictor of prognosis in patients with diffuse large Bcell lymphoma.

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), an indicator of nutritional status and systemic inflammation, is associated with short-term and long-term outcomes of various malignancies. The prognostic value of PNI in diffuse large Bcell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to determine the prognostic value of baseline PNI in DLBCL patients. We retrospectively analyzed data from 103DLBCL patients treated with R‑CHOP or R‑CHOP-like regimens. We evaluated the significance of PNI as apredictor of response to treatment, overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). Patients with a PNI≤ 44.55, where the cut-off was calculated by receiver operating characteristics (Youden index) and the same was obtained for response to treatment with 76.2 % sensitivity and aspecificity of 85.4 %, for OS with 72.4 % sensitivity and aspecificity of 90.5 % and for EFS with 65.6 % sensitivity and aspecificity of 90.1 %, had significantly worse 5‑year OS (18.3 % vs 86.4 %, P< 0.001, log rank test) and 5‑year EFS (15.1 % vs 82.3 %, P< 0.001, log rank test). Regression analysis showed that PNI≤ 44.55 was an independent prognostic factor for response to treatment with an odds ratio (OR) of 4.88 for treatment failure, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.077-22.105, OS hazard ratio (HR) 4.24, 95 % CI 1.451-12.392 and EFS HR 4.007, 95 % CI 1.48-10.852. Lower PNI levels were found in patients with advanced Ann Arbor clinical stage (46.6± 7.77 vs. 52.7± 5.43) and in those with poor response to therapy (40.58± 7.26 vs. 50.67± 6.26). The PNI is asimple and useful marker to predict long-term survival outcome in DLBCL patients. Low PNI predicted poor outcome. Alimitation of the study is its retrospective design in which the prognostic value was tested in the derivation cohort only. Notwithstanding, this is the first study suggesting that PNI is an important prognostic factor in DLBCL.

MAP plus maintenance pegylated interferon α-2b (MAPIfn) versus MAP alone in patients with resectable high-grade osteosarcoma and good histologic response to preoperative MAP: First results of the EURAMOS-1 “good response” randomization.

LBA10504 Background: EURAMOS-1 (NCT00134030) is an international randomized controlled trial investigating treatment optimization in osteosarcoma on the basis of histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy (CT). In patients (pts) with “good response” (GR; &lt;10% viable tumor at surgery) to induction CT, efficacy of maintenance therapy with pegylated interferon α-2b (Ifn) was investigated. Methods: Pts ≤40yrs with resectable localized or primary metastatic high-grade extremity or axial osteosarcoma were eligible for registration at diagnosis. Eligibility for randomization included: [a] receipt of two cycles pre-op methotrexate, doxorubicin, cisplatin (MAP); [b] complete macroscopic resection of primary tumor; and [c] no disease progression. GR pts were randomized (1:1) after surgery to four cycles MAP +/-Ifn. Ifn (0.5-1.0 μg/kg/wk) was given after CT until 2yr post registration. Primary endpoint: event free survival (EFS); secondary: overall survival, toxicity. The trial design sought improved 3yr EFS from 70% to 80% (80% power, 2-sided alpha 5%). The final analysis was planned after 147 EFS events. Results: 2,260 pts were registered (Apr 05 to Jun 11) from 17 countries (326 sites) making it the largest trial in this rare cancer. GR was reported in 1,034 pts and 715 consented to randomization (358 MAP, 357 MAPIfn) with baseline characteristics balanced by arm: median age 14yr, 59% male, 79% localized disease. 271/357 (76%) pts started Ifn; main reason for not starting was treatment refusal, 66/86. By Feb 13 234/271 had stopped Ifn. Median duration of Ifn if started was 455 days; grade 3+ toxicity during Ifn reported by 81pts (30%). Median follow-up is 3.1yr with 174 EFS events reported: 93 MAP, 81 MAPIfn. Hazard ratio for EFS from adjusted Cox model was 0.82 (95% CI 0.61-1.11; p=0.201) in favor of MAPIfn. Conclusions: With current follow-up, EFS for MAPIfn is not statistically superior to MAP alone in pts with high-grade osteosarcoma and good response to pre-op MAP. One-quarter of pts did not start Ifn, which may have influenced this finding. Further follow-up for events and survival continues. Clinical trial information: NCT00134030.

EBV(+) Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Is Infrequent in Upper Central United States and Lacks Unique Clinical Characteristics or Adverse Prognosis Compared to EBV (−) Counterparts: Results From University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic SPORE

AbstractAbstract 1604 BackgroundEBV (+) DLBCL of the elderly is a lymphoproliferative disorder recently included as a provisional entity in the 2008 WHO classification of lymphoid tumors. Defined as EBV (+) DLBCL in patients over the age of 50 years without known immunosuppression, information is evolving in this entity. To date, the true incidence of EBV (+) DLBCL in adults remains imprecisely determined and may vary regionally. This study sought to determine the incidence, presenting clinical characteristics, and outcome of EBV (+) in an unselected cohort of DLBCL patients enrolled in a prospective observational study. MethodsThe University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic SPORE Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) is a prospective, longitudinal observational study designed to collect information on patterns of care and outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma. Patients seen at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN and the University of Iowa within 9 months of their initial diagnosis of lymphoma are offered enrollment. HIV (+) patients are excluded. Baseline patient reported data, clinical data and initial management are collected using a standard protocol and a central pathology review is performed. After enrollment, patients are actively followed for events (disease progression, retreatment, and death) and disease related comorbidities. Tissue Micro Arrays (TMA) are constructed on available primary biopsy specimens. Epstein Barr Encoded RNA (EBER) EBV testing was performed by in-situ hybridization, and scored by an expert hematopathologist. EBER reactivity in more than 30% of malignant cells were required for EBV(+) designation. All DLBCL patients from the MER with available TMA excluding primary mediastinal DLBCL and post transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are included in the current analysis. Event free survival (EFS) was defined as time from diagnosis until recurrence, retreatment, or death due to any cause. Results184 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients with available TMAs were enrolled in the MER from 2002–2009. The median age at enrollment was 62 (range 18–89) and 57% were male. 89.7% were treated with immunochemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 66 months (range 1–116), 80 patients (43%) had an event which included 59(32%) deaths. TMA testing was positive for EBV in 13 (7 %) samples with an even distribution among age groups. There was a trend toward higher percentage of stage III/IV disease (85 vs 57%, p = 0.052), and BM involvement (46 vs 16%). EBV (+) was not associated with other extranodal disease or further identifiable differences in presenting clinical characteristics. Controlling for IPI, the hazard ratio for EFS among EBV+ in DLBCL pts over 50 was 0.41 (95% CI = 0.13–1.32) p = 0.14. EFS and OS curves for pts over 50 are shown below. There were no events or deaths in the 4 EBV+ pts under age 50. ConclusionsEBV+ DLBCL represents a small proportion of DLBCL patients presenting for care to our academic medical centers, consistent with reports from other regions. Substantial unique clinical characteristics at presentation for those pts with EBV+ disease were not identified, and outcomes were no worse than EBV (−) counterparts. Given the apparent regional differences in reports of EBV(+) DLBCL of the elderly, future clinical series will need to establish a more precise definition or determine more distinctive features to justify adoption of EBV(+) DLBCL of the elderly as a full entity in the WHO classification. [Display omitted] Disclosures:No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Tamoxifen versus tamoxifen plus octreotide LAR as adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer in postmenopausal women: Update of NCIC CTG MA14 trial.

542 Background: Early preclinical data involving insulin/IGF physiology suggested a potential role for the use of a somatostain analogue in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. In 1996, the NCIC CTG initiated a trial of tamoxifen (T) alone versus the combination of tamoxifen with LAR octreotide (oct) in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. The final analysis for event-free survival (EFS) was reported at ASCO in 2008; this is an update. Methods: This phase III trial randomized early- stage postmenopausal women to T 20 mg daily for 5 years with or without oct (90 mg depot injections monthly) initially prescribed for 5 years and then reduced to 2 years due to concerns over cholelithiasis. Patients were stratified by nodal status, adjuvant chemotherapy and ER. EFS, the primary endpoint, defined as time from randomization to recurrence, second malignancy, or death due to any cause, along with relapse free survival ( RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed with an adjusted log- rank statistic and step-wise forward adjusted Cox analyses. Results: 667 women were accrued (333 to T and 334 to T + oct). MA.14 now has a median follow-up of 9.8 years, and 252 EFS events (130 on T and 122 on T +oct). The EFS hazard ratio (HR) is 0.93 (95% CI 0.73, 1.20; p-value = 0.57). We saw significantly longer EFS for women under 60 (p = 0.003), who had less than T2 tumours (p = 0.03), with N0 disease (p = 0.01), median or lower BMI (p < 0.0001), and lower c-peptide levels (p < 0.0001). Relapse-free survival (RFS, 78 events on T and 70 on T + oct) likewise had a non-significant (p = 0.40) HR of 0.87 (0.63, 1.21) as did OS (86 deaths on T and 84 on T + oct) with a HR of 0.94 (0.69, 1.27; p = 0.69). The number of breast cancer specific deaths in this older population was 54 on T, 57 on T + oct. Conclusions: Attempted manipulation of the insulin/IGF pathway with somatostatin analogue did not result in the intended declines in IGF-I or insulin levels in this trial. Insulin secretion estimated by c-peptide level is confirmed as an important negative prognostic factor. Targeting the insulin/IGF axis with metformin and/or antireceptor antibodies and/or specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors in ongoing trials will be of interest. Author Disclosure Employment or Leadership Position Consultant or Advisory Role Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration Novartis, Pfizer

High Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in the Primary Therapy of Advanced Follicular Lymphoma in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Abstract 2314Poster Board II-291 Background:The impact of high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the upfront management of adults with advanced follicular lymphoma (FL) on overall survival remains uncertain. A number of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) compared ASCT to conventional dose chemotherapy regimens. We performed a systematic review to address this question. Objective:To compare the overall survival (OS), event free survival (EFS), treatment related mortality (TRM), incidence of secondary myelodysplasia/acute myeloid leukemia (t-MDS/AML) and secondary solid tumors within the ASCT strategy and chemotherapy. Methods:We performed a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, American Society of Hematology (ASH), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), BIOSIS, PAPERSFIRST, PROCEEDINGS, clinical trials registries (National Cancer Institute, clinicaltrials.gov) and bibliographies of relevant studies for randomized controlled trials comparing myelo-ablative chemotherapy with ASCT to any chemotherapy in adults with untreated advanced (Ann Arbor stage III-IV) FL. Two reviewers recorded study characteristics, methodology and outcomes. Disagreement was resolved by discussion. Results:Seven trials were identified and included in the systematic review but only four with available data reporting 941 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Three trials excluded: one was never reported; the second was stopped early due to the increased toxicities in the transplant arm; and the third showed no significant difference in EFS or OS at an interim analysis with insufficient data for the meta-analysis. None of these studies has been published. In one of the 7 trials patients in both arms received rituximab during the induction treatment. High dose therapy and ASCT did not result in improved OS compared to standard therapy, Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.15 (0.85, 1.55). The HR for EFS was 0.61 (0.34, 1.11) with substantial heterogeneity, I2 =91%, Chi2 p value <0.00001. Only the duration of the follow up could explain this heterogeneity with statistically significant subgroup interaction, P <0.00001. The incidence of t-MDS/AML ranged from 1% to 7% in the ASCT arms of the four studies, with a difference in favour of standard chemotherapy, Risk Difference (RD) 4% (95%CI: -1%, 8%), and significant heterogeneity (Chi2 p value of 0.008, I2=75%) due to difference in duration of follow up (p=0.005 for the subgroup differences).There was no increase in mortality directly attributable to treatment (RD 0%, 95%CI: -2%, 1%) nor in secondary solid tumors (RD 1%, 95%CI: -2%, 4%). Conclusions:High dose therapy and ASCT as part of initial does not improve overall survival despite a trend towards better disease control, likely because of the effectiveness of second and subsequent lines of treatment for FL. T-MDS/AML occurs more commonly following ASCT and represents a significant risk to patients. With one exception, these studies were conducted before the introduction of monoclonal B cell antibodies. Future trials of ASCT in the context of current chemo-immunotherapy approaches to FL would further inform this issue. Disclosures:No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Does quality of treatment-related harms reporting affect conclusions about superiority of treatment?

6607 Background: It is often not known if harms were considered in the overall benefit-risk evaluation in deciding about the superiority of treatments. Here we present a study examining the relationship between researchers’ conclusions about the superiority of treatment with quality of treatment-related harms reporting. Methods: We reviewed all consecutive phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) conducted by Southwest Oncology Group from 1960 to 2003 (117 RCTs involving 139 comparisons enrolling 58,908 patients). We extracted data on primary outcomes [overall survival (OS), event free survival (EFS)], and treatment-related mortality (TRM). We classified the quality of reporting as good, intermediate or poor. Association of superiority of treatment and harms reporting was evaluated using chi-square test and meta-analytic techniques. Results: 76% of studies (106/139) reported TRM. Of these, the quality of reporting of harms was considered as “good” in 36% (38/106) of studies, “intermediate” in 55% (58/106), and “poor” in 9% (10/106). Investigators judged experimental treatments to be superior in 34% of trials (48/139) while standard treatment was superior in 66% (91/139). TRM data was reported in 75% (36/48) of results favoring experimental treatments and 78% (70/91) of results favoring standard treatments. There was no association between superiority of a treatment and TRM reporting (p = 0.80) or quality of harms reporting (p = 0.83). The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for OS in RCTs reporting TRM was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.99) and for RCTs not reporting TRM was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.89, 1.09) (test of heterogeneity p = 0.06). The pooled HR for EFS among RCTs reporting TRM was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.94) and for RCTs not reporting TRM it was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.79, 1.29) (test of heterogeneity p = 0.07). Additionally, the pooled HR for OS and EFS did not show any bias in reporting of harms according to harms reporting quality. Conclusions: Investigators’ conclusion regarding the superiority of experimental or standard treatment does not appear to be associated with outcome reporting bias for harms. Investigators judge both harms and benefits when they draw conclusions about treatment superiority. No significant financial relationships to disclose.