Despite some measure of theoretical and predictive success of the electron-heated model of solar flares, observations of low levels of soft X-ray emission prior to the detection of hard X-rays in most flares present a problem for the paradigm, since it suggests some sort of preheating of the chromospheric plasma before electron acceleration. Particularly troublesome are assertions that plasma have been observed prior to hard X-ray emission, because they imply significant and rapid energy input by some agent without leaving a (currently) detectable hard X-ray signature. Given this challenge to a prevailing paradigm, it is imperative to investigate more comprehensively the existence of flows manifested in the asymmetry of X-ray spectral lines. In this paper, we examine a sample of 50 disk-center flares observed by the Yohkoh Bragg Crystal Spectrometer (BCS) between 1991 and 1993, and determine with the velocity differential emission measure the extent to which flows occur. We explore specifically the possibility that these flows are only apparent, arising from the existence of more than one emission region on the solar disk. The spatial separation between regions could cause the emission to be registered by the detector in a wavelength bin that is shifted relative to the line's nominal location, giving rise to line asymmetries. In our sample, we find that only five flares manifest flows, three of which can be explained definitively by the presence of other active regions. It also appears plausible that the remaining two events can be explained in terms of such spatial effects, although the evidence is more circumstantial. We conclude, therefore, that one can reasonably question the existence of flows in our sample and that the observations to date cannot contribute decisively to the electron versus proton debate. These results are contrasted with those of Plunkett & Simnett, who identified 14 events in a sample of 35 flares and hence concluded, without further analysis, that protons, rather than electrons, must be the primary energy carriers in flares. Our paper's sample included eight of Plunkett & Simnett's 14 events, and yet our analysis, which employed substantially different methods, identified only one of these eight as a precursor event. The remaining seven were either troubled by BCS data dropout or failed to exceed the 10% threshold required to classify a flare as aprecursor event.
Read full abstract