Hand Bone Mineral Density Measurements Research Articles

Is hand bone mineral density a marker for hand function in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis? The correlation among bone mineral density of the hand, radiological findings and hand function

The objective of this study is to assess the role of hand bone mineral density (BMD) as a prospective marker for hand function and the correlation of hand BMD with X-ray findings and hand functioning in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Eighty-three female patients diagnosed with RA were enrolled. All BMD measurements were performed on both hands. The radiological evaluation was conducted according to the van der Heijde modification of the Sharp method (Sharp/van der Heijde). Duruöz Hand Index (DHI) was used to establish the disability in the hands. Furthermore, handgrip strength (HGS), pinch strength (PS), lateral pinch (LP), tip-to-tip pinch (TTP) and three-fingered pinch (TFP) on both the dominant and the non-dominant hands was measured. A significant positive correlation between hand BMD and HGS as well as all PSs with p < 0.05 was observed, while no statistically significant relation was observed between BMD and DHI (p > 0.05). The hand BMD and the Sharp/van der Heijde scores were significantly in reverse correlation (p < 0.05). As for other DHI-related variants, HGS and PS and the total DHI scores were reversely correlated, while there was a positive significant association with radiological scores (p < 0.05). HGS and TTP were found significant (p < 0.05) as a result of a multivariant linear stepwise regression analysis among the sub-groups of DHI, HGS, LP, TTP, TFP and radiographic total scores. Our study demonstrated that a one-off hand BMD measurement failed to adequately indicate a loss in hand function as measured by DHI. Ultimately, HGS and TTP were shown to be the most effective indicators for measuring hand functions.

Quantification of periarticular demineralization and synovialitis of the hand in rheumatoid arthritis patients

The bone mineral density (BMD) measurement of the hand in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients is no standard measurement method as yet. The aim was to contribute to the standardization of the hand BMD measurement, especially of periarticular regions. As results, we found best precision values for the wrist and a significant correlation between hand and spine/femur BMD depending on disease activity and disease duration. This study was conducted to investigate (i) the precision of periarticular hand BMD measuring, (ii) the periarticular demineralization of the hand, (iii) the correlation between periarticular hand BMD and spine/femur BMD, and (iv) the correlation of hand BMD to hand synovitis. A number of 52 RA patients were examined by BMD measurement of the femoral neck, spine, whole hand, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints II-V, personal identity profile (PIP) joints II-V, and wrist using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Synovitis of the hand was examined by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Three subgroups were further analyzed: early RA, established RA with moderate and with high disease activity. Early RA and established RA patients with high disease activity were Followed up after 12 months. We found (1) best precision of BMD measurement for the wrist, (2) BMD in RA significantly reduced if compared to normal controls, (3) a highly significant positive correlation between hand and spine/femur BMD and the power of correlation to depend on disease activity and disease duration (high correlation in RA with moderate disease activity and early RA, very high correlation in RA with high disease activity), (4) a negative correlation between hand BMD and hand synovitis in RA with high disease activity, and (5) a significant reduction of synovitis but no change in hand BMD after 12 months, respectively. This study shows a highly significant correlation between hand BMD and spine/femur BMD in RA patients depending on disease activity and disease duration. We conclude to measure BMD at different sites including hands in order to quantify bone loss in RA patients most properly.

Measurement of hand bone mineral density in early rheumatoid arthritis using dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry

The earliest radiological change in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is periarticular osteopenia, which occurs prior to the appearance of erosions and clinically apparent deformities. The aim of the study was to measure periarticular bone mineral density (BMD) in the hands of patients with early RA, using dual energy X-ray absorptiomentry (DEXA) and to correlate this with markers of disease activity and radiological progression. The study population (n = 50) of patients with RA of < 3 years duration underwent measurement of BMD of the non-dominant hand, femoral neck and lumbar spine and clinical assessment at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Hand radiographs were performed at baseline and 12 months. Thirty age- and sex-matched controls also underwent measurement of BMD of the non-dominant hand, femoral neck and lumbar spine. Hand BMD correlated strongly with sex, height, weight and lumbar and femoral neck BMD in both RA subjects and controls. Baseline hand BMD in RA subjects correlated with baseline serum C-reactive protein (r = -0.36, P = 0.01) and 12-month radiographic score (r = 0.36, P = 0.02). There were small non-significant decreases in hand, femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD over the 12-month period. Hand BMD measurement using DEXA is a reproducible, well-tolerated procedure that warrants further investigation as a component of routine assessment in early RA.

Serum levels of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 and periarticular bone loss in early rheumatoid arthritis

We investigated the relationship between disease activity, serum biological mediators of joint damage, and periarticular bone loss in inflammatory arthritis. Patients with early inflammatory arthritis were recruited from a dedicated early arthritis clinic. At the time of recruitment, all had clinical evidence of synovitis. Patients were assessed at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. Periarticular and axial bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Serum levels of matrix metalloproteinase 1 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP-1) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A total 38 patients were included in the study. Twenty had rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 18 had a seronegative spondylarthropathy (SpA). At baseline, periarticular hand BMD measurements were similar in RA and SpA. At 1 year, the mean periarticular hand BMD was significantly lower in RA (p < 0.05). Significant inverse correlations between both the Ritchie articular index and C-reactive protein levels and the change in periarticular hand BMD at 1 year were observed in RA (r = -0.792, p < 0.001 and r = -0.478, p = 0.045, respectively). Baseline TIMP-1 levels correlated with the change in periarticular hand BMD at 1 year in RA (r = 0.519, p = 0.02). At 1 year, radiographic measures of joint damage were highest in RA. Inverse correlations between the change in periarticular hand BMD and the changes in erosion score (r = -0.90, p = 0.04) were observed in patients demonstrating significant periarticular bone loss. Persistent disease activity was associated with increased periarticular bone loss in the hands in patients with RA, consistent with synovitis-mediated periarticular bone loss. The correlation between baseline TIMP-1 levels and periarticular bone loss over 1 year suggests that TIMP-1 may have utility as a biomarker of periarticular bone loss in early RA.

Correlations Between Bone Mineral Density of the Hand and Other Skeletal Sites as Measured by DXA in Chinese Women and Men

This study was aimed at assessing the correlations between the bone mineral density (BMD) of the hand and other skeletal sites in Chinese women and men. We measured the BMD of the total body, the anteroposterior lumbar spine (L2-L4), bilateral proximal femurs (i.e., total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter), and bilateral total hands in 363 Chinese adults (96 males, 267 females) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, Student's t tests, and Pearson's correlation coefficients (r). We found that bilateral hand measurements reduced precision error by 36% as compared with a single hand measurement. Dominant hand BMD was significantly higher than nondominant hand BMD. For both the dominant and nondominant sides, hand BMD was significantly higher in males than in females. Hand BMD correlated significantly (p<0.001) with the BMD of all skeletal sites for all subjects (r=0.681-0.848), the male group (r=0.568-0.857), and the female group (r=0.687-0.859). After normal references for the Chinese population have been established, further investigations may determine the clinical usefulness of hand BMD measurement in the diagnosis of osteoporosis and the prediction of fracture risk.

Validation of the use of the hand for estimating bone mineral density in other skeletal sites by DXA in healthy and osteoarthritic women.

Hand bone mineral density (BMD) by DXA has mainly been used to assess bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Its use in healthy subjects is limited. The following study was conducted to determine if measurements of hand BMD could estimate ones risk of osteoporosis and predict BMD in other skeletal sites. Subjects consisted of 134 Caucasian females (57-88 yr, 46 with self-reported osteoarthritis and the rest healthy). BMD was measured in the hand, forearm, hip, spine, and total body with the Lunar DPX-MD instrument. Subjects were divided into those with osteoarthritis (OA) and those without and were examined separately, as well as together. Hand BMD correlated significantly with all skeletal sites for the whole population and for each group. Pearson r for the whole population ranged from 0.56 in the lumbar spine to 0.82 in the forearm. Subjects with OA had higher correlations for most sites. Subjects' T-scores, derived from the reference population of young normal adult women, for hip, spine, forearm, and whole body correlated highly with hand BMD. To test how accurately hand BMD could predict BMD in other skeletal sites, we generated regression models from three-fourth of our subjects (n = 102). Based on the resulting regression equations and measured hand BMD, we calculated the predicted values of the BMD in all other skeletal sites for the remaining one-fourth of the subjects (n = 32). The predictive mean square errors, calculated from the observed and predicted values for each skeletal site, were small and below the cutoff values in F-distribution. In conclusion, hand BMD has a potential to establish one's risk for osteoporosis as well as reasonably accurately predict BMD in other skeletal sites. The hand BMD measurement in general, whether a part of DXA or as a separate instrument, might have a potential to be used for mass screening and in prospective studies to determine risk of fractures.

Relationship between bone mineral density and radiologic scores of hands in rheumatoid arthritis.

This study proposed to assess the relationship between hand bone mineral density (BMD) and radiographic scoring methods, important measures to assess the course of rheumatoid arthritis. Hand, spine, and femur BMD of 49 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and 34 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects were measured using dual X-ray absorptiometry and the results were compared. Standard hand films of patients were scored according to five different scoring methods--Larsen method, modified Larsen method, Sharp/van der Heijde modified method, carpo:metacarpal ratio, and simple erosion narrowing score (SENS)--and were correlated with hand BMD. There was a moderate relationship between hand BMD measurements and radiologic scores. SENS was the method that correlated significantly with the highest correlation coefficient. Hand BMD correlated significantly with disease duration and c-reactive protein levels. Hand BMD in patients with rheumatoid arthritis was significantly lower than in control subjects, whereas there was no significant difference in axial BMD measurements. The advantages and disadvantages of hand BMD and radiographic scoring methods were determined. Our results indicate that hand BMD measurements may be as useful is assessing the course of rheumatoid arthritis as radiologic scoring methods. However to prove this, a well-designed reference population for hand BMD and longitudinal studies are required.