Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Research Articles

Robotic living donor nephrectomy is associated with reduced post-operative opioid use compared to hand-assisted laparoscopic approach.

Robotic donor nephrectomy (RDN) has emerged as a safe alternative to laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). Having previously demonstrated comparable efficacy, this study aims to examine postoperative analgesia use (opioid and non-opioid) in the two groups. We conducted a retrospective review of 300 living donor nephrectomies performed at our center, comparing 150 RDN's with a contemporary cohort of 150 hand-assisted LDN's. In addition to clinical and demographic information, data on postoperative inpatient opioid and non-opioid analgesia (from patient's arrival to the surgical floor after surgery till the time of discharge) was collected. Opioid dosages were standardized by conversion to morphine milligram equivalents (MME). All patients were managed post-operatively under a standardized ERAS pathway for living donor nephrectomy patients. There were no significant differences in donor age, gender, and BMI between RDN and LDN groups. Total post-operative opioid use (MME's) was significantly lower in RDN patients (RDN 27.1 vs. LDN 46.3; P < 0.0001). Breakdown of opioid use with post-operative (POD) day demonstrated significantly lower use in RDN group on POD1 (RDN 8.6 vs. LDN 17.0; P < 0.05), and POD2 (RDN 3.9 vs LDN 10; P < 0.05). RDN patients had a shorter post-operative length of stay (LOS) (RDN 1.69days vs. LDN 1.98; P = 0.0003). There were no differences between groups in non-opioid medication use, complications, and readmission rates. RDN has comparable safety to hand-assist LDN and offers additional benefits of lower postoperative opioid requirement and a shorter hospital LOS.

Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy in the Republic of North Macedonia.

Introduction: Hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy has become the technique of choice for living donor kidney donations. Since 2018, 30 procedures have been performed at our clinic using this technique. The goal of this comparative analysis was to determine how surgical technique, specifically, hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy with hand assistance may affect early graft function when compared to open classical nephrectomy. Material and methods: Retrospective analyses were performed, comparing the two techniques of kidney donation. Kidney transplantation was performed with the open standard technique in both groups. The primary outcome was early graft function, and levels of urine output, and plasma creatinine were analyzed at three time points. A secondary outcome was the quality of the operative technique, which was determined by the time of warm ischemia, blood loss, and duration of surgery. Additionally, we noted all complications, length of hospital stay, and patient satisfaction. Results: In terms of warm ischemia time, there was no statistically significant difference between donors in both groups. It is important to note that in 2 recipients from Group II we did not observe diuresis at the conclusion of the operation. The recipients' diuresis was 515 ml ± 321SD in group I and 444 ml ± 271SD in group II. At 3, 12, and 36 hours postoperatively, there were statistically significant differences in the average serum creatinine values (p 0.05) in favor of group I. Similar results were observed in the second time measurement at 12 h and the third time measurement at 36 h for serum urea levels in recipients. The difference in serum urea values between the recipients in the groups at the first measurement (3h) following surgery was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is recognized as a safe and effective treatment. Donors in this situation have a different profile from other surgical patients; hence, they do not undergo surgery due to their own medical condition but for an altruistic reason, and with hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy. Such patients receive all the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. The two main objectives of a donor nephrectomy are to give the recipient the best possible kidney and to ensure the donor's complete safety.

Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Single Center Comparison of Three Different Techniques.

In this study, we compare three different surgical approaches at a single institution. Pure laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with Pfannenstiel incision (PLDN) was compared with hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy via midline hand port (HALDNM) and hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy via left iliac hand port (HALDNL). This study included all laparoscopic left donor nephrectomies performed at our institution between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021. Donor characteristics including age, sex, body mass index, number of renal arteries, duration of surgical procedure, warm ischemia time (WIT), and length of hospital stay were compared. Cosmetic scores were calculated by totaling the length of all incisions placed. Postoperative complications within 90 days were compared. During the study period 71 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies were performed of which 26 were HALDNM, 24 were HALDNL, and 21 were PLDN. Donor characteristics were similar in all three groups. Total operative time was significantly lower in HALDNM (181 minutes) than PLDN (233 minutes) and HALDNL (242 minutes) (p < 0.001). The WIT was comparable in all three groups: HALDNL (7.2 minutes), PLDN (4.1 minutes), and HALDM (4.9 minutes) (p = 0.913). Median cosmetic score was significantly better in the PLDN group (8.2 cm) when compared to HALDNM (11.1 cm) and HALDNL (9.9 cm) (p < 0.001). Our results show that all three technical modifications of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy are safe and feasible with good postoperative outcomes. HALDNM has the added benefit of decreased operative time while PLDN has a cosmetic advantage.

Hand port-site infection after hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for living-donor kidney transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.

BackgroundHand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN) is widely performed to minimize burden on living kidney donors. However, hand port-site infections after HALDN may occur. This study aimed to assess the impact of donor characteristics including preoperative comorbidities and operative factors on hand port-site infection after HALDN.MethodsIn this single-center, retrospective cohort study, 1,260 consecutive HALDNs for living-donor kidney transplantation performed between January 2008 and December 2021 were evaluated. All living donors met the living kidney donor guidelines in Japan. Hand port-site infections were identified in 88 HALDN cases (7.0%). To investigate risk factors for hand port-site infection, donor characteristics including preoperative comorbidities such as hypertension, glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia, obesity, and operative factors such as operative duration, blood loss, preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, and prophylactic subcutaneous suction drain placement at the hand port-site were analyzed using logistic regression analysis.ResultsIn the multivariate analysis, significant differences were identified regarding sex (P = 0.021; odds ratio [OR], 1.971; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.108–3.507), preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (P < 0.001; OR, 0.037; 95% CI [0.011–0.127]), and prophylactic subcutaneous suction drain placement at the hand port-site (P = 0.041; OR, 2.005; 95% CI [1.029–3.907]). However, a significant difference was not identified regarding glucose intolerance (P = 0.572; OR, 1.148; 95% CI [0.711–1.856]). Preoperative comorbidities may not cause hand port-site infections within the donors who meet the living kidney donor guidelines. Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis is crucial in preventing hand port-site infection, whereas prophylactic subcutaneous suction drain placement may increase the risk of hand port-site infection.

Two- and three-dimensional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparative study of a single-center experience.

BackgroundThis is the first report on three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic donor nephrectomy performed in the Central Asian region and Commonwealth of Independent States countries. This study presents the results of our initial experiences of 3D hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (3D-HALDN) in comparison with the outcomes of two-dimensional hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (2D-HALDN) at a single center.MethodsFrom 2015 to 2019, 19 3D-HALDN and 19 2D-HALDN procedures were performed at the same center by two surgeons. All 38 procedures used identical techniques. Between-group differences were considered statistically significant at P<0.05.ResultsThe baseline characteristics in both groups were statistically comparable (P>0.05). All donors underwent left nephrectomy. Donors who underwent 3D-HALDN had better outcomes than those who underwent 2D-HALDN, as shown by a shorter warm ischemic time (P<0.05), a shorter operative time (P<0.05), and less blood loss (P<0.05). There were no conversions or major complications (according to the Clavien-Dindo classification) in either group. The average drainage duration and postoperative hospitalization were significantly shorter in the 3D-HALDN group (P<0.05). The between-group differences in the mean postoperative creatinine level and glomerular filtration rate were not significant.ConclusionsThe 3D-HALDN approach is more beneficial than traditional 2D-HALDN by providing a shorter warm ischemic time, less blood loss, and shorter durations of drainage and postoperative hospitalization. Postoperative complications and the functional condition of the kidney in donors in the early and late postoperative periods did not depend on the type of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: 1864 cases in 15 years of experience.

To evaluate hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN) in terms of intraoperative and postoperative results. After institutional review board approval was obtained, a total of 1864 HALDN operations performed between March 2007 and January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), status of smoking and presence of previous abdominal surgery, laterality, operative time, transfusion requirement, port counts, length of extraction incision, time until mobilization, time until oral intake, donor serum creatinine levels before and one week after the surgery, length of postoperative hospital stay, intraoperative complications, and postoperative recovery and complications were recorded and statistically analyzed. Multiple renal arteries, BMI, right nephrectomy and male sex were also separately evaluated as risk factors for complications and operative time. A total of 825 (44.26%) male and 1039 (55.74%) female patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the patients was 45.79 ± 12.88 years. There were a total of 143 complications (7.67% of the total 1864 cases) consisting of 68 (3.65%) intraoperative and 75 (4.02%) postoperative complications. Open conversion was necessary for 10 patients (0.53%) to manage intraoperative complications. Reoperation was needed for 1 patient due to bleeding 6 h after the operation. Multiple renal arteries were a risk factor for intraoperative complications and prolonged operative time. Right nephrectomy and male sex were also related with longer operative times. HALDN is a safe procedure associated with low complication rates.

Renal pedicle control in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: Evaluation of a single-center experience.

Introduction and Study Purpose:Renal pedicle control is a crucial period in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). Till now, there is no standardized technique for renal pedicle control. Proper evaluation and investigation of the different ways of renal vessel control have to be done to avoid any calamitous event. We aim to prove the safety and reliability of the Hem-o-Lok clips for the renal vascular control in transperitoneal LDN.Methods:All LDNs or hand-assisted LDNs done between January 2016 and December 2018 were collected. The primary outcome was the safety of the Hem-o-Lok clips. The secondary outcomes were blood loss, ischemia time, hospital stay, cost, and operative time. The data were analyzed using SPSS 20, and a statistical package was conducted.Results:The data showed that 238 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies were done. The renal pedicle control during the 1st year was done using a vascular stapler for the artery (63 cases) and two polymer self-locking clips extra-large (XL) for the vein. Two events were reported in the form of mechanical failure. In the following 2 years, the artery was controlled using polymer self-locking clips large (L) few millimeters distal to the aorta and two metallic clips distal to it to increase the safety and stability of the vascular stump (175 cases). However, the vein was controlled by the two polymer self-locking clips XL. There was no reported intraoperative complications or events related to this way of pedicle control; there was no open conversion or blood transfusion required. There was no postoperative complication or collection in ultrasound.Conclusion:Using a combined polymer self-locking clip few millimeters distal to the aorta and two metallic clips distal to it for renal artery control in laparoscopic donor nephrectomies is cost-effective and safe. However, further and broader evidenced base studies are still needed to establish a standard technique for renal pedicle control.

Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy with Terminal Hand Assisted Technique: Experience in 60 Donors and Recipients

Introduction: The limitation of cadaveric organ donations and the rapidly increasing number of patients with end stage renal disease awaiting kidney transplantation made living kidney donation indispensable. An important contribution to the revolution in living nephrectomy technique is hand assisted donor nephrectomy. Herein, we report our experience in hand assisted donor nephrectomy technique and its effect on the graft outcome. Methods: During the period from January 2012 till December 2015, 60 cases of hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies were performed including 35 females and 25 males with a median age of 46.3±11.6 years. Results: Our mean operative donors' time was 93±21.8 minutes, and mean warm ischemia time was 48±9.1 seconds. Donor hospitalization time was between 3 and 5 days (mean 4 days). Follow up of the graft function after one year revealed mean serum creatinine of 1.56±1.03 mg/dl, mean GFR of 39.8±10.9 ml/min/1.73m and renal Doppler resistive index of 0.62±0.15. Conclusion: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with terminal hand assisted technique is a minimally invasive surgery that may improve donor acceptance and can become the procedure of choice in the near future. Also this technique has a good outcome concerning both warm ischemia time and graft outcome.

Laterality in laparoscopic hand assisted donor nephrectomy - Does it matter anymore? Outcomes of a large retrospective series

This retrospective study was performed to analyse if laterality of the retrieved living donor kidney had any effect on donor and recipient outcomes after hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN). 739 donors who underwent HALDN between January 2006 and January 2018 at a large tertiary transplant centre in the United Kingdom were included. Donor outcomes in individuals undergoing right versus left HALDN were compared with respect to conversion rates, morbidity, warm and cold ischaemia times and recipient failure rates, vascular and ureteric complications.604 (81.7%) underwent left HALDN and 135 (18.3%) underwent right HALDN, mean age was 47.1 years and 46.8 years respectively with comparable gender distribution. The operative time was shorter for the left side (p = 0.003) and improved during the study for the left but not the right side. In recipients who received left kidneys there were more early technical failures observed (8 versus 1) though not statistically significant.Most centres prefer performing a left nephrectomy and recipient surgeons prefer a left kidney for transplantation primarily because of having a longer vein. This large study provides reassurance that right HALDN nephrectomy is a safe procedure with similar outcomes to left HALDN.

Predicting Operation Time and Creating a Difficulty Scoring System in Donor Nephrectomy.

Background: To determine predictive formulas for operation time and surgical difficulty in laparoscopic living-donor kidney transplantation. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data for 222 living donors aged >20 years and recorded factors affecting operation time from patients' CT images and medical records. We used the factors significantly affecting operation time to create a formula to predict operation time and designed a model to predict surgical difficulty based on the standardized partial regression coefficient, β. We also analyzed the relationship between surgical difficulty (high vs low) and operation time. Results: This study involved 111 pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomies (PRDN) and 111 hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies (HALDN). Patients' mean age was 55.7 years, and 59.5% were women; 5.0% underwent right nephrectomy, and 77.0% vs 23.0% had single- vs multiple renal arteries. The average estimated kidney graft weight was 160.0 g, and actual average graft weight was 155.3 g. The following factors were significantly correlated with operation time in the regression analysis: number of renal arteries, Mayo adhesive probability score, estimated kidney graft weight, right nephrectomy, and operation type (PRDN). These five factors were used to create the operation time prediction equation and difficulty scoring system. The multiple r2 value was 0.40 for the operation time prediction equation. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the difficulty scoring system revealed the following: sensitivity: 78.0%, specificity: 64.9%, and c-statistic: 0.76 (95% confidence interval: 0.70 to 0.83). Conclusions: The equation to predict operation time and the surgical difficulty prediction model created in this study are easy to calculate and are accurate. Both may help in selecting an appropriately skilled surgeon and in improving safety in living-donor kidney transplantation.

Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy in Living Donors with a History of Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundHand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN) is frequently performed in living kidney transplantation donors. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of HALDN for living donors with abdominal surgical histories.Material/MethodsA total of 573 living kidney donors underwent donor nephrectomies for living donor kidney transplantation between January 2008 and May 2015. Eighteen donors underwent open donor nephrectomy and were excluded from analyses. Left HALDN was performed in 533 donors, including 44 donors with abdominal surgical histories and 489 donors without abdominal surgical histories. Right HALDN was performed in 22 donors, including 11 donors with abdominal surgical histories and 11 donors without abdominal surgical histories. Graft quality including the lengths of arteries, veins and ureters, time to initial urination, recipient complications, and recipient estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and operation quality including warm ischemic time, blood loss, operation duration, donor complications and donor eGFR, were compared between donors with and without abdominal surgical histories in the left and right HALDN groups.ResultsThe metrics of graft and operation quality were similar between living kidney donors with and without a history of abdominal surgery who underwent left or right HALDN.ConclusionsThe efficacy and safety of HALDN were not impaired by abdominal surgical histories.

Impact of the introduction of pure retroperitoneoscopic living‐donor nephrectomy on perioperative donor outcomes: A propensity score matching comparison with hand‐assisted laparoscopic living‐donor nephrectomy

We previously reported that the outcomes of pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy are superior to those of hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy. Consequently, we introduced pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy in our hospital. Here, we compared perioperative outcomes between hand-assisted intra-abdominal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy. We retrospectively reviewed data from 315 living-donor kidney transplantation procedures performed between October 2015 and December 2020 (213 involving hand-assisted intra-abdominal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, October 2015 to June 2019; 102 involving pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy, May 2019 to December 2020). After propensity score matching, 90 transplantations were included in each group (n=180 overall). Donors in the pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy group had longer warm ischemia times (P< .001), lower serum C-reactive protein concentrations and white blood cell counts on postoperative day 1 (P< .001 and P< .001, respectively), and shorter postoperative stays (P< .001) than donors in the hand-assisted intra-abdominal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy group. Five (5.6%) modified Clavien-classifiable complications occurred in the hand-assisted intra-abdominal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy group; no complications occurred in the pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy group (P= 0.008). One recipient in the hand-assisted intra-abdominal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy group had donor-related delayed graft function. There were no significant differences between groups in recipient estimated glomerular filtration on postoperative day 7. The introduction of pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy was safe and effective. Moreover, it was less invasive and less harmful for donors, compared with hand-assisted intra-abdominal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy; recipient outcomes were equivalent.

Comparison of the effects of intravenous propofol and inhalational desflurane on the quality of early recovery after hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a prospective, randomised controlled trial

ObjectivesWe compared early recovery outcomes between living kidney donors who received total intravenous (IV) propofol versus inhalational desflurane during hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy.DesignA single-centre, prospective randomised controlled trial.SettingUniversity hospital.ParticipantsStudy participants were...

Outcomes and surgical complications following living-donor renal transplantation using kidneys retrieved with trans-peritoneal or retro-peritoneal hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy.

The best minimally invasive procedure for living-donor kidney retrieval remains debated. Our objective was to assess trans-peritoneal (TP) and retro-peritoneal (RP) hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN). In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed results from 317 living-donor renal transplants (RT) performed between 2008 and 2016. Donor and recipient outcomes were compared between TP-HALDN (n=235) and RP-HALDN (n=82). Conversion to open nephrectomy (0.4% vs 0%; P=1.000), intra-operative complications (1.7% vs 1.2%; P=1.000), and 1-year overall post-operative complications (11.9% vs 17.1%; P=.258) rates were similar in TP-HALDN and RP-HALDN. Overall surgical site infections were higher in RP-HALDN (6.1% vs 1.7%; P=.053), whereas incisional hernias were only recorded following TP-HALDN (3.4% vs 0%; P=.118). The duration of the procedure was 11-minute shorter for TP-HALDN than RP-HALDN (P<.001) but extraction time was equivalent (2, IQR 1.5-2.5minutes; P=1.000). RT following TP-HALDN and RP-HALDN showed comparable one-year death-censored allograft survival (97% vs 98.8%; P=.685), primary non-function (0.4% vs 0%; P=.290), delayed graft function (1.3% vs 4.9%; P=.077), and urological complications (2.6% vs 4.9%; P=.290) rates. In our series, donor and recipient outcomes were not substantially affected by the approach used for donor nephrectomy. TP-HALDN and RP-HALDN were both safe and effective.

Effect of rectus sheath block vs. spinal anaesthesia on time-to-readiness for hospital discharge after trans-peritoneal hand-assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: A randomised trial.

The role of spinal anaesthesia in patients having a transperitoneal hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in an enhanced recovery setting has never been investigated. We explored whether substituting a rectus sheath block (RSB) with spinal anaesthesia, as an adjunct to a general anaesthetic technique, influenced time-to-readiness for discharge in patients undergoing hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Prospective randomised open blinded end-point (PROBE) study with two parallel groups. Tertiary University Hospital. Ninety-seven patients undergoing a trans-peritoneal hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Patients (n=52) were randomly assigned to receive a general anaesthetic and a surgical RSB with 2 mg kg-1 of levobupivacaine at the time of surgical closure or a spinal anaesthetic with hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg and diamorphine 0.5 mg (n=45) before general anaesthesia. The primary outcome was the time-to-readiness for discharge following surgery. Median [IQR] times-to-readiness for discharge were 75 [56 to 83] and 79 [67 to 101] h for RSB and spinal anaesthesia and there was no significant difference in times-to-readiness for discharge (median difference 4 (95% CI, 0 to 20h; P = 0.07)). There were no significant differences in pain scores at rest (P = 0.91) or on movement (P = 0.66). Median 24-h oxycodone consumptions were similar (P = 0.80). Nausea and vomiting scores were similar (P = 0.57) and urinary retention occurred in one vs. four patients with RSB and spinal anaesthesia, respectively (P = 0.077). Substitution of RSB with spinal anaesthesia using 12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.5 mg diamorphine, together with a general anaesthetic failed to confer any benefit on time-to-discharge readiness following transperitoneal hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. RSB provided similar analgesia in the immediate postoperative period with a low frequency of side-effects in this cohort. ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT02700217.

Regional Report on Organ Transplantation in Trinidad and Tobago.

Regional Report on Organ Transplantation in Trinidad and Tobago.

Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score of non-donated kidney aids in predicting post-operative renal function following donor nephrectomy

BackgroundTo examine the association of preoperative Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) scores in the donor (MAPd) and non-donor kidneys (MAPnd) with post-donation renal function.MethodsThree hundred thirty-one patients undergoing hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN) were reviewed. MAPd and MAPnd were obtained. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was recorded preoperatively and at 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months postoperatively.ResultsTwo hundred females and 131 males were evaluated with median BMI 26.4 kg/m2 (range 17.1–39.6) and median age 45 years (range 19–78). MAPd score was 0 for 231 patients (69.8%) and > 0 for 100 patients (30.2%). MAPnd score was 0 for 234 patients (70.7%) and > 0 for 97 patients (29.3%). The median preoperative eGFR was 86.6 ml/min/1.73m2 (range 48.8–138.4). After adjusting for preoperative eGFR, BMI, ASA score, and kidney sidedness, postoperative eGFR was associated with MAP score in the non-donated kidney (p = 0.014) but not in the donated kidney (p = 0.24). Compared to donors with MAPnd = 0, donors with a MAPnd > 0, mean eGFR was − 2.33 ml/min/1.73m2 lower at postoperative day 1 (95% CI − 4.24 to − 0.41, p = 0.018), − 3.02 ml/min/1.73m2 lower at 1 month (95% CI − 5.11 to − 0.93, p = 0.005), and − 2.63 ml/min/1.73m2 lower at 6 months postoperatively (95% CI − 5.01 to − 0.26, p = 0.030).ConclusionsMAP score > 0 in the non-donated kidney is associated with worse renal function in the 6 months following HALDN.

Right Kidney Mini-Invasive Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Safe and Efficient Alternative

Introduction: Right kidney living donor transplantation is considered more difficult and associated with more complications. The objective was to evaluate donor safety and graft function of right hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN). Methods: A total of 270 consecutive HALDN procedures have been performed in our institution up to April 2017. We retrospectively compared the outcomes of right-sided nephrectomy (R-HALDN) to left-sided nephrectomy (L-HALDN) to evaluate donor safety and graft function of R-HALDN. Results: Sixty-seven right kidneys were removed for functional asymmetry in favour of left kidney (35/67) or left kidney multiple arteries (28/67). Among the donors, neither conversion to open surgery nor preoperative blood transfusion was necessary. There was no significant difference in operative time, compared to L-HALDN group (170 ± 37 min vs. 171 ± 32 min; p value = 0.182). Warm ischaemia time was significantly longer for R-HALDN (4.0 ± 1.6 min vs. 3.0 ± 1.7 min; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in terms of post-operative complications and serum Cr levels. Among the recipients, there were no graft venous thrombosis. There was no significant difference in delayed graft function (3 for R-HALDN group and 8 for L-HALDN group; p value = 0.847), serum Cr levels, and graft survival. Conclusion: R-HALDN is a safe procedure for kidney donors, with excellent graft function for the recipients, compared to L-HALDN.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in kidneys with multiple renal arteries versus a single renal artery: An analysis of vascular complications from 1,350 cases.

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) has been shown to be a safe approach with better morbidity results. Impact of multiple renal arteries (MRAs) and anatomical variations has been reviewed by many authors. In our study, the relationship between the donors with MRAs and risk of perioperative vascular complications related to donor nephrectomy was investigated. Patients who underwent hand-assisted LDNs between January 2007 and February 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, side of donor nephrectomies, donors with MRAs, intraoperative vascular complications, conversion rates, hospitalization durations, and operative times were extracted. Risk factors for perioperative vascular complications were defined. There were MRAs in 288 kidney donors (21.3%). The number of patients who underwent a right donor nephrectomy was 113 (8.4%). BMI, waist circumference, and postoperative hospital stay were not significantly different between donors with one artery and those with MRAs (p>0.05). The renovascular complication rate and overall conversion rate to open surgery were significantly higher in donors with MRAs (p<0.05). Perioperative safety of the kidney donors is of crucial importance. Surgeons performing LDNs must be aware of the potential risks. Our analysis suggests that procurement of kidneys from donors with MRAs is a risk factor for renovascular complications.

Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic vs Hand-Assisted Retroperitoneoscopic Living-Donor Nephrectomy: A Retrospective, Single-Center, Propensity-Score Analysis of 840 Transplants Using 2 Techniques

IntroductionLiving-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is the most realistic option for patients with end-stage kidney disease because of a severe shortage of deceased donors. Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN) and hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (HARDN) have been undertaken at our institute. We compared these 2 surgical procedures with respect to donor outcome and the graft function of recipients. MethodsWe reviewed data from 840 consecutive live-donor kidney transplants from October 2003 to April 2019. Propensity scores were calculated for each patient using bivariate logistic regression. ResultsAfter propensity-score matching, the 2 groups each contained 205 patients. Donors in the HALDN group had a longer procedure time (217 minutes, P < .0001), less estimated blood loss (51 mL, P < .0001), lower serum levels of C-reactive protein at postoperative day (POD) 1 (7.9 mg/dL, P < .0001) than those in the HARDN group. There were 22 modified Clavien-classifiable complications among the study groups. A significantly higher conversion to open surgery was noted in the HARDN group (P = .0181) than in the HALDN group, but there was no significant difference in the prevalence of complications in either group. There was no significant difference in the estimated glomerular filtration rate of recipients at POD14 between the 2 groups. ConclusionsSafety and early graft function of HALDN in LDKT are comparable to or even better than that of HARDN.