Half-dose Images Research Articles

Imaging Characteristics and Clinical Utility of Half-Dose versus Full-Dose Ultrawidefield Fundus Fluorescein Angiography

PurposeIn early 2022, a fluorescein shortage occurred in the United States. To meet the standard of care for patients who required ultra-wide fundus fluorescein angiography (UWFFA), a regimen of half-dose (250mg) sodium fluorescein (10%) was adopted instead of the full-dose (500mg) at the Cole Eye Institute (CEI). In this paper, we compare the image quality, clinical utility, and the side effect profile of half-dose vs full-dose fluorescein in UWFFA for a cohort of stable patients. DesignRetrospective chart review. Subjects, Participants, and/or ControlsPatients with retinal vascular disease were included if they received half-dose and full-dose UWFFA (Optos California, Dunfermline, UK) within 6 months at the CEI. Eyes were excluded if they received intraocular injections, laser procedures, new immunosuppression, and worsened or improved inflammation on clinical examination. Methods, Intervention, or TestingQuantitative assessment of vascular leakage was performed using a machine-learning enhanced automated segmentation platform. Leakage from late-phase UWFFA images was compared between half-dose and full-dose images. Qualitative assessment of image quality and relative vascular leakage was performed by 2 masked independent reviewers. Side effects after fluorescein administration were recorded for each patient. Main Outcome MeasuresMasked leakage grading and automated leakage scores. ResultsThere were 52 eyes of 35 patients, 42 (81%) uveitic, 5 (9%) diabetic, and 4 (8%) normal controls. Patients had no change to their visual acuity (LogMAR mean 0.3±0.6), anterior chamber and vitreous cell between UFFWA’s. UWFFA images were deemed of equal quality and leakage by both masked reviewers (78-87% agreement, kappa 0.642). Automated leakage analysis showed mildly increased leakage in half-dose images overall (3.8% vs 2.8%, p=0.01), and in the macula (1.5% vs 0.6%, p=0.01). Side effects included nausea (half (n=3, 9%) vs full (n=2, 6%), p=0.69) and urticaria (n=0, 0% vs n=1, 2%, p=0.99) and were not different between doses. ConclusionsIn this cohort, half dose UWFFA produced images that were of similar quality, clinical utility and with a similar side effect profile compared to full dose. Half dose UWFFA can be used to accurately assess the retinal vasculature and could be used primarily as a method to save cost and prevent waste.

Task-based assessment of digital mammography microcalcification detection with deep learning denoising algorithmss using in silico and physical phantom studies.

Recent research suggests that image quality degradation with reduced radiation exposure in mammography can be mitigated by postprocessing mammograms with denoising algorithms based on convolutional neural networks. Breast microcalcifications, along with extended soft-tissue lesions, are the primary breast cancer biomarkers in a clinical x-ray examination, with the former being more sensitive to quantum noise. We test one such publicly available denoising method to observe if an improvement in detection of small microcalcifications can be achieved when deep learning-based denoising is applied to half-dose phantom scans. An existing denoiser model (that was previously trained on clinical data) was applied to mammograms of an anthropomorphic physical phantom with hydroxyapatite microcalcifications. In addition, another model trained and tested using all synthetic (Monte Carlo) data was applied to a similar digital compressed breast phantom. Human reader studies were conducted to assess and compare image quality in a set of binary signal detection 4-AFC experiments, with proportion of correct responses used as a performance metric. In both physical phantom/clinical system and simulation studies, we saw no apparent improvement in small microcalcification signal detection in denoised half-dose mammograms. However, in a Monte Carlo study, we observed a noticeable jump in 4-AFC scores, when readers analyzed denoised half-dose images processed by the neural network trained on a dataset composed of 50% signal-present (SP) and 50% signal-absent regions of interest (ROIs). Our findings conjecture that deep-learning denoising algorithms may benefit from enriching training datasets with SP ROIs, at least in cases with clusters of 5 to 10 microcalcifications, each of size .

Evaluation of pediatric malignancies using total-body PET/CT with half-dose [18F]-FDG.

To explore the impact of a true half dose of [18F]-FDG on image quality in pediatric oncological patients undergoing total-body PET/CT and investigate short acquisition times with half-dose injected activity. One hundred pediatric oncological patients who underwent total-body PET/CT using the uEXPLORER scanner after receiving a true half dose of [18F]-FDG (1.85MBq/kg) were retrospectively enrolled. The PET images were first reconstructed using complete 600-s data and then split into 300-s, 180-s, 60-s, 40-s, and 20-s duration groups (G600 to G20). The subjective analysis was performed using 5-point Likert scales. Objective quantitative metrics included the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), SUVmean, standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and SNRnorm of the background. The variabilities in lesion SUVmean, SUVmax, and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) were also calculated. The overall image quality scores in the G600, G300, G180, and G60 groups were 4.9 ± 0.2, 4.9 ± 0.3, 4.4 ± 0.5, and 3.5 ± 0.5 points, respectively. All the lesions identified in the half-dose images were localized in the G60 images, while 56% of the lesions could be clearly identified in the G20 images. With reduced acquisition time, the SUVmax and SD of the backgrounds were gradually increased, while the TBR values showed no statistically significant differences among the groups (all p > 0.1). Using the half-dose images as a reference, the variability in the lesion SUVmax gradually increased from the G180 to G20 images, while the lesion SUVmean remained stable across all age groups. SNRnorm was highly negatively correlated with age. Total-body PET/CT with a half dose of [18F]-FDG (1.85MBq/kg, estimated whole-body effective dose: 1.76-2.57mSv) achieved good performance in pediatric patients, with sufficient image quality and good lesion conspicuity. Sufficient image quality and lesion conspicuity could be maintained at a fast scanning time of 60s with half-dose activity.

Dose Reduction in Molecular Breast Imaging With a New Image-Processing Algorithm

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine whether application of a proprietary image-processing algorithm would allow a reduction in the necessary administered activity for molecular breast imaging (MBI) examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Images from standard-dose MBI examinations (300 MBq 99mTc-sestamibi) of 50 subjects were analyzed. The images were acquired in dynamic mode and showed at least one breast lesion. Half-dose MBI examinations were simulated by summing one-half of the dynamic frames and were processed with the algorithm under study in both a default and a preferred filter mode. Two breast radiologists independently completed a set of two-alternative forced-choice tasks to compare lesion conspicuity on standard-dose images, half-dose images, and the algorithm-processed half-dose images in both modes. RESULTS. Relative to the standard-dose images, the half-dose images were preferred in 4, the default-filtered half-dose images in 50, and preferred-filtered half-dose images in 76 of 100 readings. Compared with standard-dose images, in terms of lesion conspicuity, the half-dose images were rated better in 2, equivalent in 6, and poorer in 92 of 100 readings. The default-filtered half-dose images were rated better, equivalent, or poorer in 13, 73, and 14 of 100 readings. The preferred-filtered half-dose images were rated as better, equivalent, or poorer in 55, 34, and 11 of 100 readings. CONCLUSION. Compared with that on standard-dose images, lesion conspicuity on images obtained with the algorithm and acquired at one-half the standard dose was equivalent or better without compromise of image quality. The algorithm can also be used to decrease imaging time with a resulting increase in patient comfort and throughput.

Low kV versus dual-energy virtual monoenergetic CT imaging for proven liver lesions: what are the advantages and trade-offs in conspicuity and image quality? A pilot study.

Single-energy low tube potential (SE-LTP) and dual-energy virtual monoenergetic (DE-VM) CT images both increase the conspicuity of hepatic lesions by increasing iodine signal. Our purpose was to compare the conspicuity of proven liver lesions, artifacts, and radiologist preferences in dose-matched SE-LTP and DE-VM images. Thirty-one patients with 72 proven liver lesions (21 benign, 51 malignant) underwent full-dose contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT (DECT). Half-dose images were obtained using single tube reconstruction of the dual-source SE-LTP projection data (80 or 100kV), and by inserting noise into dual-energy projection data, with DE-VM images reconstructed from 40 to 70keV. Three blinded gastrointestinal radiologists evaluated half-dose SE-LTP and DE-VM images, ranking and grading liver lesion conspicuity and diagnostic confidence (4-point scale) on a per-lesion basis. Image quality (noise, artifacts, sharpness) was evaluated, and overall image preference was ranked on per-patient basis. Lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was compared between techniques. Mean lesion size was 1.5±1.2cm. Across the readers, the mean conspicuity ratings for 40, 45, and 50keV half-dose DE-VM images were superior compared to other half-dose image sets (p<0.0001). Per-lesion diagnostic confidence was similar between half-dose SE-LTP compared to half-dose DE-VM images (p≥0.05; 1.19 vs. 1.24-1.32). However, SE-LTP images had less noise and artifacts and were sharper compared to DE-VM images less than 70keV (p<0.05). On a per-patient basis, radiologists preferred SE-LTP images the most and preferred 40-50keV the least (p<0.0001). Lesion CNR was also higher in SE-LTP images than DE-VM images (p<0.01). For the same applied dose level, liver lesions were more conspicuous using DE-VM compared to SE-LTP; however, SE-LTP images were preferred more than any single DE-VM energy level, likely due to lower noise and artifacts.

Performance of Half-dose Chest Computed Tomography in Lung Malignancy Using an Iterative Reconstruction Technique

Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of half-dose chest CT using an iterative reconstruction technique in patients with lung malignancies. Methods The Dual-source CT scans were obtained and half-dose datasets were reconstructed with 5 different strengths in 38 adults with lung malignancies. Two radiologists graded subjective image quality; noise, contrast and sharpness at the central/peripheral lung, mediastinum and chest wall of the reconstructed half-dose images, compared with those of standard-dose images, using a three-point scale. A lesion assessment; lesion conspicuity and diagnostic confidence, was also performed. The quantitative image noises; contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were measured and compared with those of standard-dose images. Results The subjective image noise in the half-dose images was less than that of the standard-dose images. The contrast in strengths 2 to 5 was superior, the sharpness of the lung parenchyma in strengths 3 to 5 was inferior, and the CNR/SNR in all strengths were higher than those of standard-dose images ( P &amp;lt; 0.05). The improvement of subjective image noise and contrast, the decrease in sharpness, were correlated with strength level ( P &amp;lt; 0.05). The lesion conspicuity in half-dose images of strengths 4 and 5 was decreased. The diagnostic confidence of the half-dose images of all strengths was comparable to that of the standard-dose images ( P &amp;lt; 0.05). Conclusions Half-dose chest CT images using an iterative reconstruction technique show decreased image noise, increased contrast, and diagnostic confidence comparable to standard-dose images. Images reconstructed with strength 2 and 3 appear to be the optimal choice in clinical practice.

Ferumoxytol as an off-label contrast agent in body 3T MR angiography: a pilot study in children.

Ferumoxytol is an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) nanoparticle agent used to treat iron deficiency anemia in adults with chronic kidney disease. We aim to determine the feasibility of using ferumoxytol for clinical pediatric cardiac and vascular imaging. We retrospectively identified 23 consecutive children who underwent MRI with ferumoxytol (11 males; mean age: 7.4years, range: 3days-18years), yielding 12 abdominal MR angiography and 15 cardiac MRI studies. Medical records were reviewed for the clinical indication, ferumoxytol dose, injection rate, sedation and any complication. A two-reader consensus scored the images on a five-point scale for overall image quality and delineation of various anatomical structures. Signal-to-background ratios for abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava for abdominal cases and blood pool-myocardium contrast ratios for cardiac cases were calculated. The confidence intervals for obtaining a score of three or above for each image parameter were calculated by using adjusted Wald method. For abdominal MR angiography, average scores for overall image quality, as well as delineation of the hepatic artery, superior mesenteric artery, renal artery and veins were 4.5, 4.3, 4.3, 3.7 and 4.7, respectively. For cardiac exams, the average scores for overall image quality, systemic arteries, pulmonary arteries, pulmonary veins, valves and ventricles were 4.4, 4.6, 4.1, 4.8, 4.1 and 4.7, respectively. For all parameters, the lower bound for the proportion of cases to have a score of 3 or above was 65%. Signal-to-background ratios for aorta and abdominal veins averaged 86 +/- 74 and 86 +/- 77 for full-dose images, and 23 and 18 for half-dose images, respectively. Mean blood pool to myocardium contrast ratio was 3:3. Ferumoxytol can provide excellent image quality for pediatric body MR angiography/MR venography at a dose of 1.5 or 3mg Fe/kg. Further investigation should be directed toward understanding the lowest dose that can be administered.

Half-dose non-contrast CT in the investigation of urolithiasis: image quality improvement with third-generation integrated circuit CT detectors.

The objective of this study is to establish the effect of third-generation integrated circuit (IC) CT detector on objective image quality in full- and half-dose non-contrast CT of the urinary tract. 51 consecutive patients with acute renal colic underwent non-contrast CT of the urinary tract using a 128-slice dual-source CT before (n = 24) and after (n = 27) the installation of third-generation IC detectors. Half-dose images were generated using projections from detector A using the dual-source RAW data. Objective image noise in the liver, spleen, right renal cortex, and right psoas muscle was compared between DC and IC cohorts for full-dose and half-dose images reconstructed with FBP and IR algorithms using 1 cm(2) regions of interest. Presence and size of obstructing ureteric calculi were also compared for full-dose and half-dose reconstructions using DC and IC detectors. No statistical difference in age and lateral body size was found between patients in the IC and DC cohorts. Radiation dose, as measured by size-specific dose estimates, did not differ significantly either between the two cohorts (10.02 ± 4.54 mGy IC vs. 12.28 ± 7.03 mGy DC). At full dose, objective image noise was not significantly lower in the IC cohort as compared to the DC cohort for the liver, spleen, and right psoas muscle. At half dose, objective image noise was lower in the IC cohort as compared to DC cohort at the liver (21.32 IC vs. 24.99 DC, 14.7% decrease, p < 0.001), spleen (19.33 IC vs. 20.83 DC, 7.20% decrease, p = 0.02), and right renal cortex (20.28 IC vs. 22.98 DC, 11.7% decrease, p = 0.005). Mean obstructing ureteric calculi size was not significantly different when comparison was made between full-dose and half-dose images, regardless of detector type (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). Third-generation IC detectors result in lower objective image noise at full- and half-radiation dose levels as compared with traditional DC detectors. The magnitude of noise reduction was greater at half-radiation dose indicating that the benefits of using novel IC detectors are greater in low and ultra-low-dose CT imaging.

Intraindividual Comparison of Diagnostic Performance in Patients With Hepatic Metastasis of Full-Dose Standard and Half-Dose Iterative Reconstructions With Dual-Source Abdominal Computed Tomography

The objectives of the study were to evaluate the image quality and diagnostic performance of sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) for detecting hepatic metastasis and to estimate the potential radiation dose reduction at abdominal computed tomography (CT). Fifty-nine consecutive patients (mean age, 59.2 years; range, 42-81 years) who had hepatic metastasis and who underwent dual-source abdominal CT were enrolled in this study. The image noise of the liver was compared between full-dose filtered back projection images (FD-FBP) and simulated half-dose images, which used only single-source projection data, and reconstructed with different strengths of SAFIRE (HD-SAFIRE(1-5)) by 1-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. The diagnostic performance for hepatic metastasis was compared by logistic regression with the weighted least squares method and noninferiority test between the FD-FBP images and the half-dose sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (HD-SAFIRE) images. As the SAFIRE strength increased, image noise decreased (P < 0.001). The images of HD-SAFIRE(2) showed similar image noise for liver parenchyma (13.4 Hounsfield unit [HU]), signal-to-noise ratio for liver parenchyma (9.2), and lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (4.5), compared with the FD-FBP images (12.6 HU, P = 0.668; 9.6, P > 0.999; and 4.5, P > 0.999, respectively). The diagnostic accuracy for hepatic metastasis with the HD-SAFIRE(2) images (87.5%) was not different from that of the FD-FBP images (87.5%, P > 0.999). The diagnostic performance of the HD-SAFIRE(2) images was also noninferior to that of the FD-FBP images (95% confidence interval lower limit difference [-9.16%] excluding the -10% clinical noninferiority limit). The mean (SD) volume CT dose index of FD-FBP was 11.26 (2.66) mGy, and the mean (SD) radiation dose equivalent associated with HD-SAFIRE was estimated to be 5.63 (1.33) mGy. By applying SAFIRE2, the radiation dose could be reduced by up to 50% compared with the standard-of-care abdominal CT protocol without increasing image noise and without deteriorating diagnostic performance for the detection of hepatic metastasis.

Dose Reduction in Computed Tomography of the Chest: Image Quality of Iterative Reconstructions at a 50% Radiation Dose Compared to Filtered Back Projection at a 100% Radiation Dose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of iterative reconstruction (IR) in chest computed tomography (CT) to reduce radiation exposure. The qualitative and quantitative image quality of standard reconstructions with filtered back projection (FBP) and half dose (HD) chest CT data reconstructed with FBP and IR was assessed. 52 consecutive patients underwent contrast-enhanced chest CT on a dual-source CT system at 120 kV and automatic exposure control. The tube current was equally split on both tube detector systems. For the HD datasets, only data from one tube detector system was utilized. Thus, FD and HD data was available for each patient with a single scan. Three datasets were reconstructed from the raw data: standard full dose (FD) images applying FBP which served as a reference, HD images applying FBP and IR. Objective image quality analysis was performed by measuring the image noise in tissue and air. The subjective image quality was evaluated by 2 radiologists according to European guidelines. Additional assessment of artifacts, lesion conspicuity and edge sharpness was performed. Image noise did not differ significantly between HD-IR and FD-FBP (p = 0.254) but increased substantially in HD-FBP (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found for the reproduction of anatomical and pathological structures between HD-IR and FD-FBP, subsegmental bronchi and bronchioli. The image quality of HD-FBP was rated inferior because of increased noise. A 50 % dose reduction in contrast-enhanced chest CT is feasible without a loss of diagnostic confidence if IR is used for image data reconstruction. Iterative reconstruction is another powerful tool to reduce radiation exposure and can be combined with other dose-saving techniques. • Iterative reconstructions allow for image noise and artifact reduction.• Comparable image data can thus be attained even at 50 % radiation dose.• Diagnostic confidence remains unaffected.

Raw-data-based iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection: image quality of low-dose chest computed tomography examinations in 87 patients

ObjectiveThe objective was to compare standard-dose chest computed tomography (CT) reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) versus low-dose images with FBP and raw-data-based iterative reconstruction. MethodsEighty-seven consecutive patients (46 male; mean age, 54.54±16.12; mean body mass index, 24.58±4.07) referred for initial chest CT with full-dose examinations [mean dose–length product (DLP), 183.37±44.13 mGy·cm] and follow-up chest CT with half-dose examinations (mean DLP, 91.08±23.81 mGy·cm) were included. The full-dose protocol was reconstructed with FBP; the half-dose protocol was reconstructed with FBP and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE). Noise and signal-to-noise ratio were compared using a paired Student’s t test; subjective image quality and lesion conspicuity were compared using Wilcoxon signed ranks test. ResultsActual radiation dose of follow-up CT was about 50% (49.26%±2.62%) of standard-dose protocol. Compared to full-dose images with FBP, there was no significant difference in half-dose images with SAFIRE in the objective noise (ascending aorta: P=.38, descending aorta: P=.70, trachea on mediastinal images: P=.37) and SNR (ascending aorta: P=.14, descending aorta: P=.72, trachea on mediastinal images: P=.06) on mediastinal images. Noise was significantly lower (P<.001) and SNR was significantly higher (P<.001) in half-dose images with SAFIRE on lung images. Noise was significantly higher (P<.001) and SNR was significantly lower (P<.001) in half-dose images with FBP. Subjective image quality was similar on both mediastinal images (P=.317) and lung images (P=.614) of half-dose SAFIRE images versus full-dose FBP images. Lesion conspicuity was also similar. Subjective image quality was significantly lower on both mediastinal images (P<.001) and lung images (P<.001) of half-dose FBP images versus full-dose FBP images. The conspicuity of some lesions was significantly lower (ground-glass opacity, P<.0001; ill-defined micronodule, P<.0001; lung cyst, P<.0001; emphysematous lesion, P=.003) on half-dose FBP versus full-dose FBP images. ConclusionCompared to full-dose CT images reconstructed with the conventional FBP algorithm, SAFIRE with three iterations could provide similar or better image quality at 50% less dose.

Assessment of a Model-Based, Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm (MBIR) Regarding Image Quality and Dose Reduction in Liver Computed Tomography

The purpose of this study was to assess the image quality of half-dose (HD) liver computed tomography (CT) using a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) compared with reference dose (RD) using filtered back projection (FBP) and the HD CT images using FBP and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR). A total of 103 patients suspected of having liver metastases underwent liver CT including HD portal venous phase imaging. Among these patients, 73 had undergone RD liver CT reconstructed using FBP, and the HD portal phase CT scans were separately reconstructed using FBP and MBIR. For the other 30 patients, the HD CT images were reconstructed using FBP, ASIR, and MBIR. The CT attenuation coefficients and the mean image noise of various sites, including the liver, the aorta, the main portal vein (MPV), and the subcutaneous fat, were measured, and the contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the metastatic lesion to the liver and the MPV to the liver were calculated. Two radiologists reviewed each image set with regard to image noise, image quality, lesion conspicuity, and diagnostic acceptability. Compared with RD CT, there was a 46.1% decrease in CT dose index volume with HD CT. Image noise was significantly lower in the HD images reconstructed with MBIR than in both the HD FBP images and the RD FBP images (P < 0.001). Compared with the RD FBP and HD FBP images, the CNRs of the metastatic lesion to the liver and the MPV to the liver were higher in the HD MBIR images (P < 0.001). Despite the presence of the unique whirling artifacts of the MBIR images, the HD MBIR images were of good to excellent quality and were not inferior to RD FBP images regarding the lesion conspicuity, the image quality, and the diagnostic acceptability (P > 0.05). Half-dose MBIR also showed less image noise, higher CNRs, and superior image quality compared with HD ASIR (P < 0.001). The HD MBIR images showed less noise, higher CNR, and better image quality than the HD ASIR and HD FBP images did; they also provided less image noise, higher CNR, and similar image quality compared with those of RD FBP images.

Pilot Study of Detection, Radiologist Confidence and Image Quality With Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction at Half–Routine Dose Level

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE) on radiological detection, diagnostic confidence, and image quality at half-dose, contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic computed tomography. Forty dual-source examinations were reconstructed using routine-dose with filtered back projection, half-dose filtered back projection, and half-dose SAFIRE. Three radiologists detected lesions in abdominopelvic organs, reporting findings of potential medical significance, diagnostic confidence, and image quality. There was greater than 78% concordance between full- and half-dose images ± SAFIRE, and no difference in the detection of lesions within organs between half-dose images ± SAFIRE (P = 0.22 - 1.0). Detection of potentially important findings varied by reader, but not between dose/reconstruction methods. Diagnostic confidence varied widely (P < 0.001 to P > 0.91). Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction significantly improved image quality in the pelvis (P ≤ 0.04). Half-dose images ± SAFIRE had organ-specific detections similar to routine-dose images. Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction improved image quality in the pelvis, but diagnostic confidence and image quality scores in the abdomen depended on the reader.

Validation of Dual-Source Single-Tube Reconstruction as a Method to Obtain Half-Dose Images to Evaluate Radiation Dose and Noise Reduction

To evaluate a method for obtaining half-dose CT images for observer studies evaluating lower-dose CT. Phantoms of varying sizes were scanned at multiple tube potentials using dose-matched dual-source (DS) and single-source (SS) protocols. Images from single-tube reconstruction of DS data were compared with SS images acquired at half-original CTDIvol. Thirty patients underwent supine SS and dose-matched prone DS CT colonography (CTC). Half-dose prone images were reconstructed with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE). Two radiologists scored image quality on 2-dimensional (2D) and 3D images. Image noise was similar between half-dose SS images and DS images reconstructed from one tube only with tube potential of 120 kV or more for phantoms 40 cm or smaller (P < 0.05). For both readers, the patients' CTC image quality scores were more than 84% concordant between SS or DS CTC images, and half-dose-prone CTC images with SAFIRE had 84% or more concordance with routine-dose CTC except for 3D image noise. In appropriately sized patients, DS acquisition with single-tube reconstruction can create half-dose images, permitting comparison to full-dose images. For CTC, there is comparable image quality for colonic evaluation between full-dose and half-dose images reconstructed with SAFIRE.

Radiation Dose Reduction of Chest CT with Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space - Part I: Studies on Image Quality Using Dual Source CT

ObjectiveTo determine whether the image quality (IQ) is improved with iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS), and whether IRIS can be used for radiation reduction in chest CT.Materials and MethodsStandard dose chest CT (SDCT) in 50 patients and low dose chest CT (LDCT) in another 50 patients were performed, using a dual-source CT, with 120 kVp and same reference mAs (50 mAs for SDCT and 25 mAs for LDCT) employed to both tubes by modifying a dual-energy scan mode. Full-dose data were obtained by combining the data from both tubes and half-dose data were separated from a single tube. These were reconstructed by using a filtered back projection (FBP) and IRIS: full-dose FBP (F-FBP); full-dose IRIS (F-IRIS); half-dose FBP (H-FBP) and half-dose IRIS (H-IRIS). Objective noise was measured. The subjective IQ was evaluated by radiologists for the followings: noise, contrast and sharpness of mediastinum and lung.ResultsObjective noise was significantly lower in H-IRIS than in F-FBP (p < 0.01). In both SDCT and LDCT, the IQ scores were highest in F-IRIS, followed by F-FBP, H-IRIS and H-FBP, except those for sharpness of mediastinum, which tended to be higher in FBP. When comparing CT images between the same dose and different reconstruction (F-IRIS/F-FBP and H-IRIS/H-FBP) algorithms, scores tended to be higher in IRIS than in FBP, being more distinct in half-dose images. However, despite the use of IRIS, the scores were lower in H-IRIS than in F-FBP.ConclusionIRIS generally helps improve the IQ, being more distinct at the reduced radiation. However, reduced radiation by half results in IQ decrease even when using IRIS in chest CT.

Raw data-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: evaluation of radiation dose saving potential

To evaluate prospectively, in patients undergoing body CTA, the radiation dose saving potential of raw data-based iterative reconstruction as compared to filtered back projection (FBP). Twenty-five patients underwent thoraco-abdominal CTA with 128-slice dual-source CT, operating both tubes at 120 kV. Full-dose (FD) images were reconstructed with FBP and were compared to half-dose (HD) images with FBP and HD-images with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE), both reconstructed using data from only one tube-detector-system. Image quality and sharpness of the aortic contour were assessed. Vessel attenuation and noise were measured, contrast-to-noise-ratio was calculated. Noise as image quality deteriorating artefact occurred in 24/25 (96%) HD-FBP but not in FD-FBP and HD-raw data-based iterative reconstruction datasets (p < 0.001). Other artefacts occurred with similar prevalence among the datasets. Sharpness of the aortic contour was higher for FD-FBP and HD-raw data-based iterative reconstruction as compared to HD-FBP (p < 0.001). Aortoiliac attenuation was similar among all datasets (p > 0.05). Lowest noise was found for HD-raw data-based iterative reconstruction (7.23HU), being 9.4% lower than that in FD-FBP (7.98HU, p < 0.05) and 30.8% lower than in HD-FBP images (10.44HU, p < 0.001). Contrast-to-noise-ratio was lower in HD-FBP (p < 0.001) and higher in HD-raw data-based iterative reconstruction (p < 0.001) as compared to FD-FBP. Intra-individual comparisons of image quality of body CTA suggest that raw data-based iterative reconstruction allows for dose reduction >50% while maintaining image quality. Key Points • Raw data-based iterative reconstruction reduces image noise and improves image quality as compared to filtered back projection • At a similar radiation dose, raw data-based iterative reconstruction improves the sharpness of vessel contours • In body CTA a dose reduction of >50% might be possible when using raw data-based iterative reconstructions, while image quality can be maintained.

Dose Reduction in Abdominal Computed Tomography

We sought to evaluate the image quality of iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in half-dose (HD) datasets compared with full-dose (FD) and HD filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction in abdominal computed tomography (CT). To acquire data with FD and HD simultaneously, contrast-enhanced abdominal CT was performed with a dual-source CT system, both tubes operating at 120 kV, 100 ref.mAs, and pitch 0.8. Three different image datasets were reconstructed from the raw data: Standard FD images applying FBP which served as reference, HD images applying FBP and HD images applying IRIS. For the HD data sets, only data from 1 tube detector-system was used. Quantitative image quality analysis was performed by measuring image noise in tissue and air. Qualitative image quality was evaluated according to the European Guidelines on Quality criteria for CT. Additional assessment of artifacts, lesion conspicuity, and edge sharpness was performed. : Image noise in soft tissue was substantially decreased in HD-IRIS (-3.4 HU, -22%) and increased in HD-FBP (+6.2 HU, +39%) images when compared with the reference (mean noise, 15.9 HU). No significant differences between the FD-FBP and HD-IRIS images were found for the visually sharp anatomic reproduction, overall diagnostic acceptability (P = 0.923), lesion conspicuity (P = 0.592), and edge sharpness (P = 0.589), while HD-FBP was rated inferior. Streak artifacts and beam hardening was significantly more prominent in HD-FBP while HD-IRIS images exhibited a slightly different noise pattern. Direct intrapatient comparison of standard FD body protocols and HD-IRIS reconstruction suggest that the latest iterative reconstruction algorithms allow for approximately 50% dose reduction without deterioration of the high image quality necessary for confident diagnosis.