Guttman Split-half Coefficient Research Articles

Adaptation and validation of the Parents’ Self-stigma Scale into Turkish and its association with parenting stress and parental self-efficacy

ObjectivesIn the present era, parents frequently stigmatize themselves for their children’s negative behaviors and inadequate social skills. Parents’ self-stigma (PSS) may lead to a decrease in parental self-efficacy and quality of marital and family life. In light of these reasons, the principal objective of this study to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the PSS Scale (PSSS) as developed by Eaton et al. (2019) and to investigate the indirect effect that parenting stress has on the relationship between PSS and parental self-efficacy.MethodsWe collected data from a total of 1,118 parents via random sampling, with the first part of the study involving 645 participants (Mage = 32.64 ± 7.28) and the second part of the study involving 473 participants (Mage = 27.43 ± 9.87). In the first part of the study, we employed structural equation modeling for the confirmatory factor analysis and Pearson’s correlation coefficient for the criterion-related validity, average variance extracted, and composite reliability analyses. Moreover, we calculated Cronbach’s alpha, McDonald’s omega, and Guttman split-half coefficients for the reliability analyses. In the second part of the study, we utilized Hayes’ bootstrapping method to assess the indirect effect of parenting stress on the relationship between PSS and parental self-efficacy.ResultsThe first part of the study confirms the PSSS’s 11-item, 3-factor structure, showing the Turkish form to have acceptable goodness-of-fit indices, and found Cronbach’s alpha for the PSSS to be 0.89. Furthermore, the first part of the study demonstrates a significant negative correlation between marital life satisfaction and PSS. Meanwhile, the second part of the study has determined PSS to be positively related to parenting stress and negatively related to parental self-efficacy. The second part of the study also indicates parenting stress to have an indirect effect on the association between PSS and parental self-efficacy.ConclusionsThe study indicates the Turkish version of the PSSS to be a valid and reliable instrument in Turkish culture for measuring parents’ PSS levels regarding their children, with higher scores indicating greater PSS. The scale can be effectively used in both research and clinical settings. The study also suggests parental stress to have a possible impact on the association between PSS and parental self-efficacy. Furthermore, addressing the variables of PSS and parenting stress in family-focused interviews and therapeutic interventions may contribute to increasing parental self-efficacy.

Validity and Reliability of a Simplified Chinese Version of Cancer Survivors' Unmet Needs Scale (CaSUN).

To translate Cancer Survivors' Unmet Needs scale (CaSUN) into Simplified Chinese, and to assess the validity and reliability of this translated version among Chinese cancer survivors. Following the cross-cultural adaptation guidelines, the original CaSUN scale was translated from English into Simplified Chinese. To enhance the readability and comprehension of each item, a pilot study involving 40 cancer patients was carried out. Subsequently, 324 cancer survivors participating in follow-up appointments at a cancer hospital in Beijing, China completed the Simplified Chinese version of the CaSUN. The scale's validity was assessed through factor analysis. Indices including Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square to degree of freedom ratio (χ2/df), comparative fit index (CFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) were employed for construct validity. Average variance extracted (AVE) of each category reflected the convergent validity. Reliability was confirmed with both Cronbach's α and Guttman split-half coefficient. Factor analysis suggested that a three-level hierarchical structure of the CaSUN with four first-order factors, nine second-order factors and all the 35 items assessing unmet need could fit our data well (χ2/df=2.833, CFI=0.902, RMSEA=0.076, SRMR=0.066), indicating sufficient construct validity for this model. For convergent validity, AVE of each second-order category were greater than 0.5. Regarding reliability, Cronbach's α of the 35 items was 0.968, and the Guttman split-half coefficient was 0.984. Both of these coefficients were higher than 0.8. The present Simplified Chinese version of CaSUN had good cultural adaptability, appropriate validity and reliability for assessing unmet needs in different cancer survivor groups in Chinese mainland. This Simplified Chinese version of CaSUN can assist health professionals in addressing individual survivor needs and bridge the gap between patients' experiences and their expectations, thereby improving the quality of cancer survivorship care.

Reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Chinese Life Attitude Self-rating Questionnaire for Breast Cancer.

Psychometrics of the Chinese Life Attitude Self-rating Questionnaire for Breast Cancer (LASQ-BC) has not yet been conducted in a larger sample of women with breast cancer. This study aimed to examine the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the LASQ-BC in Chinese mainland female breast cancer patients. This is a cross-sectional study. Reliability was determined by Cronbach's α and Guttman split-half coefficient. Convergent and discriminant validity were evaluated via item-subscale and item-total score correlations. Factorial validity was estimated using a principal component analysis with varimax rotation. Sensitivity was identified via Cohen's effect size (ES) and an independent sample t-test between the new and recurrent cases. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to further examine sensitivity of the LASQ-BC under the influence of newly diagnosed breast cancer (yes vs. no). A total of 429 patients completed the questionnaire. Cronbach's α of the LASQ-BC was 0.96, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 for the four subscales (i.e., choice and responsibility, life meaning, benevolence, and life experiences). The Guttman split-half coefficient was 0.90. The hypothesised item-subscale and item-total score correlations were higher than the critical value of 0.50. Four factors were extracted from the 23 items, explaining 69.29% of the total variance. Eligible ES (range: 0.38-0.48) was found in the four subscales and total score between the new and recurrent cases (independent sample t-test), and under the influence of newly diagnosed breast cancer (yes vs. no; multiple linear regression analysis). The Chinese LASQ-BC has acceptable reliability, validity, and sensitivity in women with breast cancer of mainland China. It can be used to female breast cancer patients as an invaluable metric and a crucial instrument for assessing and discerning those grappling with a suboptimal life attitude, and in gauging the efficacy of psychological interventions tailored to enhance this perspective.

ASSESSMENT OF AGRICULTURAL INFORMATION NEEDS OF FARMERS: TRIANGULATING RELIABILITY OF STANDARDIZED INFORMATION NEED INDEX

Agriculture, pivotal to India's economy, hinges on timely and relevant information for sustainable practices and rural livelihoods. This study delves into the intricate fabric of farmers' information needs across diverse demographics and regions to craft targeted strategies for information dissemination and capacity building. Employing an ex-post facto research design, this study surveyed 90 respondents from Sitapur district, Uttar Pradesh. Utilizing a structured interview schedule, respondents' information needs were assessed using a modified information need index. Reliability testing via reliability triangulation using Spearman-Brown, Guttman split-half coefficients and Cronbach's alpha affirming the robustness standardised information need index (SINI). The prioritized information needs unveiled Integrated Disease/Pest Management as paramount (SINI = 91.94), reflecting concerns about crop health and yield preservation. Market-related information (SINI = 87.22) and credit accessibility (SINI = 84.44) followed closely, underscoring the importance of profitability and financial support. Weather forecasting and government schemes, placed at fourth and fifth ranks with the SINI score 78.61 and 73.33 respectively, signifying risk mitigation and support avenues for farmers. These findings offer critical insights for policymakers and extension services to tailor interventions, enabling informed decision-making, fostering sustainable agricultural practices, and advancing rural development.

Psychometric Properties of the Metacognitions About Online Gaming Scale in the Chinese Population and Its Relationship With Internet Gaming Disorder: Cross-Sectional Study.

Metacognitions about online gaming have been shown to be correlated with Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD). Knowledge of metacognitions about online gaming can help to understand IGD. The Metacognitions about Online Gaming Scale (MOGS) is a reliable and valid tool to measure specific metacognitions about online gaming in both adults and adolescents, which is lacking in China. This study was conducted to assess the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the MOGS (C-MOGS) and its relationship with IGD in the Chinese population. A total of 772 Chinese individuals (age: mean 21.70, SD 8.81 years; age range: 13-57 years; 458/772, 59.3% male) completed a web-based questionnaire survey, including the C-MOGS and a battery of validated scales measuring IGD, gaming motives, depression, and anxiety. Through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, the 3-factor structure was confirmed to have adequate model fit and internal consistency reliability (Cronbach α≥.799, Guttman split-half coefficients≥0.754). Concurrent validity of the C-MOGS was supported by its correlations with IGD (P<.001), gaming motives (P<.001), depression (P<.001), and anxiety (P<.001). Furthermore, the incremental validity analysis showed that the C-MOGS predicted 13% of the variance in IGD while controlling for gender, age, weekly gaming hours, gaming motives, depression, and anxiety. This study provides evidence that the psychometric properties of the C-MOGS are appropriate and emphasizes its positive association with IGD. The C-MOGS is a reliable and valid instrument for mental health workers to assess metacognitions about online gaming in the Chinese population.

An Internal Consistency Reliability Study of the Catalyst Datafinch Applied Behavior Analysis Data Collection Application With Autistic Individuals.

Introduction Many psychometric studies have scrutinized the dependability of different instruments for evaluating and treating autism using applied behavior analysis (ABA). However, there has been no exploration into the psychometric attributes of the Catalyst Datafinch Applied Behavior Analysis Data Collection Application, namely, internal consistency reliability measures. Materials and methods Four datasets were extracted (n=100, 98, 103, and 62) from published studies at The Oxford Center, Brighton, MI, ranging from March 19, 2023, through January 8, 2024, using Catalyst Datafinch as the data collection tool. All data were gathered by Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBAs) and behavioral technicians and designed to replicate how practitioners collect traditional paper and pencil data. SPSS Statistics (v. 29.0) computed internal consistency reliability measures, including Cronbach's alpha, inter-item, split-half, and interclass correlation coefficients. Results Dataset #1: Cronbach's alpha was 0.916 with seven items, indicating excellent reliability. Cronbach's split-half reliability for Part 1 was 0.777, indicating good reliability, and for Part 2 was 0.972, indicating excellent reliability. Guttman split-half coefficient was 0.817, indicating good reliability. Inter-item correlation coefficients ranged from0.474 to0.970. The average measures interclass correlation (ICC) was 0.916, indicating excellent reliability. Single measures (ICC) reliability was 0.609, indicating acceptable reliability. Dataset #2: Cronbach's alpha was 0.954 with three items, indicating excellent reliability. Cronbach's split-half reliability for Part 1 was 0.912, indicating excellent reliability, and for Part 2 was 0.975, indicating excellent reliability. Guttman split-half coefficient was 0.917, indicating excellent reliability. Inter-item correlation coefficients ranged from0.827to0.977. Average measures (ICC) was 0.954, indicating excellent reliability. Single measures (ICC) reliability was 0.875, indicating good reliability. Dataset #3: Cronbach's alpha was 0.974 with three items, indicating excellent reliability. Cronbach's split-half reliability for Part 1 was 0.978, indicating excellent reliability. Split-half reliability for Part 2 was 0.970, indicating excellent reliability. Guttman split-half coefficient was 0.935, indicating excellent reliability. Inter-item correlation coefficients ranged from0.931to0.972. The average measures (ICC) was 0.974, indicating excellent reliability. Single measures (ICC) reliability was 0.926, indicating excellent reliability. Dataset #4: Cronbach's alpha was 0.980 with 12 items, indicating excellent reliability. Cronbach's split-half reliability for Part 1 was 0.973, indicating excellent reliability. Split-half reliability for Part 2 was 0.996, indicating excellent reliability. Guttman split-half coefficient was 0.838, indicating good reliability. Inter-item correlation coefficients ranged from0.692to0.999. The average measures (ICC) was 0.980, indicating excellent reliability. Single measures (ICC) reliability was 0.804, indicating good reliability. Conclusions These results suggest that Catalyst Datafinch demonstrates high internal consistency reliability when used with individuals with autism. This indicates that the application is reliable for collecting and analyzing behavioral data in this population. The ratings ranged from good to excellent, indicating a high consistency in the measurements.

The Validity and Reliability of the Postpartum Symptom Inventory in Turkish Women

Objective: Postpartum period is a significant period that covers approximately 6 weeks after childbirth, progresses with various symptoms, and affects the life of the woman. The study was conducted in order to test the validity and reliability of the Postpartum Symptom Inventory (PSI-20). &#x0D; Methods: The study was conducted on 310 participants with a descriptive, cross-sectional, and methodological design. The study data were collected through Identifying Information Form, Postpartum Symptom Inventory, and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as a parallel form. In the analysis of the data, factor analysis, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and item-total score correlations were used. &#x0D; Results: The scale consisted of 20 items under 6 subscales with a variance of 71%. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the Turkish version of the scale was 0.86. According to split-half test reliability, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of the first and second halves were found to be 0.71 and 0.73, respectively, Guttman split-half coefficient was 0.94, and the correlation coefficient between the halves was determined as 0.88. According to confirmatory factor analysis, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation Index (RMSEA) 0.072, Goodness of Fit index (GFI) value was 0.89, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) value was 0.94, Relative Fit Index (RFI) was 0.89, Incremental Fit Index (IFI) was 0.94, and Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) value was found as 0.93. &#x0D; Conclusion: As a result of the study, it was determined that the Turkish version of the Postpartum Symptom Inventory (PSI-20) was a valid and reliable tool in order to measure postpartum symptoms in Turkish women.

Development of stigma scale for women with mental illness in perinatal period, validity and reliability study

AimAlthough there are many scales that measure stigma, there is no scale with the necessary adequacy to measure stigma in the perinatal period. The study aims to develop the stigma scale for women with mental illness in the perinatal period and test its validity and reliability.Materials and methodsParticipants were reached via patients, visitors, and hospital staff who applied to Sakarya Training and Research Hospital between 01/06/2022 and 01/12/2022. Two hundred people (female n = 134, male n = 66) aged 18–65 participated in the study and "Sociodemographic data form," "Perinatal Mental Illness Stigma Scale (PMISS)," "Social Distance Scale," and "Beliefs Towards Mental Illness Scale" were used to collect data. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22 and the AMOS 26 program.ResultsThe Content Validity Index of the scale items was between 0.80–1. Cronbach's alpha coefficient score of the general scale was 0.94, the "Discrimination and Prejudice" sub-dimension was 0.93, and the "Labeling" sub-dimension was 0.88. It was determined that item-total score correlations varied between 0.410 and 0.799. P value calculated < 0.05 in Barlett's test and 0.94 in the Kaiser-Meyer Olkin test. These values show that factor analysis can be applied to the scale. According to the Exploratory Factor Analysis result, the scale has a 2-factor structure, explaining 60% of the total variance. The Guttman Split-Half coefficient of the scale was 0.882, and the Spearman-Brown coefficient was 0.883. The scale was reapplied to 30 participants with an interval of three weeks. The correlation coefficient between the two measurements was 0.91, indicating that the scale satisfies the invariance principle over time.ConclusionThe PMISS is a reliable measurement tool that can be used to investigate stigma towards mental illness during the perinatal period in the Turkish population.

The translation and validation of the MES for an Austrian sample.

Empathy plays an important role in midwifery care, not only for the women but also for midwives. The Midwifery Empathy Scale (MES) was developed to assess the empathy levels of midwives and midwifery students. The purpose of this study was the translation and validation of the MES for an Austrian sample. A total of 277 midwives working in Austria completed the questionnaire of the MES. The psychometric measurements that were performed included explanatory factor analysis using a varimax rotation and principal components analysis. Moreover, the internal consistency of the MES was assessed with reliability coefficients. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy and a Bartlett's test of sphericity were carried out. Principal components analysis showed seven orthogonal factors. KMO measure of sample adequacy = 0.724 and Bartlett's test of sphericity = 1058.904 (df=231, p<0.0001). The MES showed an acceptable overall internal consistency: Cronbach's alpha was found to be 0.721 and the Guttman split-half coefficient was 0.611. The findings of our study confirm the multidimensionality of MES, demonstrating a seven-factor structure which contained subscales reflecting empathy and emotional connection. The mean total score of Austrian midwives' responses to the MES was 44.80 with scores ranging from 24 to 81. This study shows that the German version of the Midwifery Empathy Scale is a reliable instrument for evaluating the empathy levels of midwives and midwifery students in Austria. The German MES could be used in the selection and education of future midwives as well as in connection with empathy trainings of midwives.

Validating the Instrument, Egunjobi’s Child Response Style Scale (CReSS)

To test the reliability and validity of the Child Response Style Scale (CReSS) measuring responses to parenting, a cross-sectional online survey (20 items) was distributed via online networks: WhatsApp, email, Facebook to infinite population in Nigeria, Kenya and Ghana. Validity and reliability were tested. The internal consistency for items and the entire scale, and other measures of reliability were tested. Also, the construct validity and the criterion-referenced validity were also measured. The construct validity, criterion-referenced validity, internal consistency reliability, and split-half reliability showed good results. The CReSS achieved a correlation between Forms = .666; Spearman-Brown Coefficient rSB = .799; Guttman Split-Half Coefficient rsb = .798; Cronbach’ Alpha α = .840. CReSS is valid and reliable.

Visual, ocular surface, and extraocular diagnostic criteria for determining the prevalence of computer vision syndrome: a cross-sectional smart-survey-based study.

The American Optometric Association defines computer vision syndrome (CVS), also known as digital eye strain, as "a group of eye- and vision-related problems that result from prolonged computer, tablet, e-reader and cell phone use". We aimed to create a well-structured, valid, and reliable questionnaire to determine the prevalence of CVS, and to analyze the visual, ocular surface, and extraocular sequelae of CVS using a novel and smart self-assessment questionnaire. This multicenter, observational, cross-sectional, descriptive, survey-based, online study included 6853 complete online responses of medical students from 15 universities. All participants responded to the updated, online, fourth version of the CVS questionnaire (CVS-F4), which has high validity and reliability. CVS was diagnosed according to five basic diagnostic criteria (5DC) derived from the CVS-F4. Respondents who fulfilled the 5DC were considered CVS cases. The 5DC were then converted into a novel five-question self-assessment questionnaire designated as the CVS-Smart. Of 10 000 invited medical students, 8006 responded to the CVS-F4 survey (80% response rate), while 6853 of the 8006 respondents provided complete online responses (85.6% completion rate). The overall CVS prevalence was 58.78% (n = 4028) among the study respondents; CVS prevalence was higher among women (65.87%) than among men (48.06%). Within the CVS group, the most common visual, ocular surface, and extraocular complaints were eye strain, dry eye, and neck/shoulder/back pain in 74.50% (n = 3001), 58.27% (n = 2347), and 80.52% (n = 3244) of CVS cases, respectively. Notably, 75.92% (3058/4028) of CVS cases were involved in the Mandated Computer System Use Program. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the two most statistically significant diagnostic criteria of the 5DC were ≥2 symptoms/attacks per month over the last 12 months (odds ratio [OR] = 204177.2; P <0.0001) and symptoms/attacks associated with screen use (OR = 16047.34; P <0.0001). The CVS-Smart demonstrated a Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of 0.860, Guttman split-half coefficient of 0.805, with perfect content and construct validity. A CVS-Smart score of 7-10 points indicated the presence of CVS. The visual, ocular surface, and extraocular diagnostic criteria for CVS constituted the basic components of CVS-Smart. CVS-Smart is a novel, valid, reliable, subjective instrument for determining CVS diagnosis and prevalence and may provide a tool for rapid periodic assessment and prognostication. Individuals with positive CVS-Smart results should consider modifying their lifestyles and screen styles and seeking the help of ophthalmologists and/or optometrists. Higher institutional authorities should consider revising the Mandated Computer System Use Program to avoid the long-term consequences of CVS among university students. Further research must compare CVS-Smart with other available metrics for CVS, such as the CVS questionnaire, to determine its test-retest reliability and to justify its widespread use.

Development of a gestational diabetes risk assessment scale: a validity and reliability study.

The aim of this study was to develop a gestational diabetes risk assessment scale (GEDRISK). This methodological study included 652 pregnant women who presented to six public health institutions in İstanbul between September 2021 and February 2022. Content validity was evaluated using the content validity index, while construct validity was assessed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Item discrimination was examined using Cronbach's alpha coefficients, Spearman-Brown and Guttman coefficients, item-total correlation tests, and 27% lower and upper quartile t tests. Reliability was determined through test-retest analysis methods. The scale-level content validity index demonstrated strong coherence at 0.83, confirming its robustness. In the EFA, the scale, comprising 18 items and 5 subdimensions, accounted for 57.48% of the variance (n = 652). The results of the confirmatory factor analysis were as follows: χ2/df = 2.28; RMR = 0.01; CFI, GFI, and IFI = 0.95; AGFI = 0.93; NFI = 0.92; RFI = 0.90; and RMSEA = 0.04. The Spearman-Brown and Guttman split-half coefficient equal length analysis produced a result of 0.826, Cronbach's alpha value was 0.756, and the temporal consistency of the scale was evaluated with the test-retest method (p = 0.184). The structure of the scale was evaluated with a validity and reliability analysis and was found to have acceptable, valid, and reliable properties. The mean total GEDRISK score of the pregnant women participating in the study was 33.57 ± 4.71. It was observed that the GEDRISK scale identified 51% of the respondents diagnosed with diabetes through an oral glucose tolerance test. The GEDRISK scale was found to be a valid and reliable tool for the measurement of gestational diabetes risk in a sample of the Turkish population.

Improving Learning Outcomes Through Interactive Learning Media Based on Macromedia Flash

In order to adapt to the curriculum changes from 2016 to 2020 in the Air Navigation Engineering D3 Program, an innovative approach utilizing interactive learning media is required. This aims to support curriculum transformation due to technological advancements and the needs of the professional world. Therefore, the objective of this research is to assess the improvement of learning outcomes through the use of interactive learning media in teaching about navigation aids. The research subjects are D3 Air Navigation Engineering 13th Alpha and Bravo cohorts. Data collection was obtained from learning outcomes through Evaluation and Interactive Learning Media on Flight Navigation Aids. This research is a quasi-experimental quantitative study using pretest-posttest design. The conclusion drawn from the review and data analysis, to assess the validity using SPSS, is that the calculated r-value (r) is greater than the critical r-value (r 0.30), indicating that the questionnaire items are valid. Meanwhile, for the reliability test results, a Guttman SplitHalf coefficient correlation value of 0.929 was obtained, which is ≥ 0.80. The Cronbach's Alpha value was 0.861. It can be concluded that all items of the ability variable (x) are valid. The pre-test and post-test scores in the control group were 40 and 75, respectively. Whereas in the experimental group, the class provided with interactive learning media obtained pre-test and post-test scores of 45 and 85, respectively. Therefore, this learning media can lead to increased student engagement and a significant improvement in their academic success

Assessment of the Attitudes Toward Childbirth in Health Sciences Students–Turkish Adaptation of the Questionnaire CAVE-ST-TR

Background: Developing and improving education and training programs for future health professionals as a way to enhance perinatal care and reduce obstetric traumas is a necessity. Objective: The goal of the current study is to adapt a questionnaire that evaluates health science students’ attitudes toward women’s childbirth experiences (CAVE-ST; acronym is for cuestionario de actitudes sobre vivencias y experiencias en el parto) into Turkish and assess its psychometric properties. Method: The sample comprised 950 undergraduate students in midwifery departments in Turkey aged between 20 and 41 years (M = 22.42, SD = 1.79). Participants filled out the Demographic Information Form as well as CAVE-ST-TR. Item and scale content validity index (I-CVI and S-CVI), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Pearson’s correlation coefficients, Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient, and Guttman split-half coefficient were used to examine psychometric properties. Results: The results revealed that the 52-item and four-factor CAVE-ST-TR is a valid and reliable tool to assess health science students’ attitudes toward women’s childbirth experiences. Conclusion: This study would enhance the cross-cultural utility of the questionnaire.

Determining the Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Nurses’ Alarm Fatigue Questionnaire

Objective: This study was conducted to examine the psychometric properties of the Nurses’ Alarm Fatigue Questionnaire. Materials and Methods: In this methodological study, the sample consisted of 142 nurses working in neonatal and pediatric intensive care. In order to test the psychometric properties of the scale, language equivalence, content and construct validity were used for validity analysis. The data were evaluated using descriptive and confirmative factor analyses, Cronbach's alpha, split-half, and item-total score correlation. Results: The total explained variance of the Turkish version of the Nurses' Alarm Fatigue Questionnaire consisting of a single sub-dimension and nine items was determined as 41%. The total factor loading was &amp;gt;0.30. In the confirmatory factor analysis, all the goodness of fit indexes were &amp;gt;0.90, and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) was &amp;lt;0.08. The correlation between the two halves was 0.71, and the Guttman split-half and Spearman-Brown coefficients were 0.83. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scale was found to be 0.80. Conclusion: The study’s findings suggest that the scale is a valid and reliable tool in determining the alarm fatigue of nurses working in newborn and pediatric intensive care units in Türkiye.

Environmental Risk Assessment of Low Back Pain in ICU Nurses: An Instrument Development Study

Aim. To develop a valid, reliable assessment tool to measure risk factors associated to low back pain (LBP) in intensive care unit (ICU) nurses. Background. LBP is defined as the pain extending from the 12th rib to the iliac crest and often coexists with buttock pain. Nursing has been identified among the top professions at risk of LBP. A mean of 70% prevalence per year in ICU nurses was reported, exceeding those employed in heavy industry. Environmental factors in workplace were also most important risks related to LBP in this population except factors including individual, physical, psychosocial, and lifestyle. However, there is lack of tools to assess environmental risk related to LBP for nurse managers currently. Methods. Focus group interviews, field research, and panel discussion were used to develop item pool. Two-round expert reviews and preinvestigation were carried out to form initial scale named Environmental Risk Assessing Instrument-Occupational Low Back Pain in Nurses (ERAI-N). A cross-sectional survey with 188 ICU participants in Hunan Province in China was implemented to collect data. Cronbach’s alpha, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability were used to test ERAI-N’s reliability. Expert review was performed to test ERAI-N’s content validity, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to assess its construct validity, being carried out in IBM SPSS Amos 26 Graphics. Results. Final version of ERAI-N scale had five dimensions with 18 items that were space, equipment, belief, guideline, and safe culture. ERAI-N scale’s score of Cronbach’s alpha, Guttman split-half, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.958, 0.927, and 0.994, respectively. Item-level content validity scores ranged from 0.89 to 1.0, and scale-level content validity was 0.983. Standardized factor loadings ranged from 0.567 to 0.974. Model adjusted fit statistics were as follows: the chi-square statistic and degrees of freedom (χ2/df) = 3.943, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.071, incremental fit index (IFI) = 0.905, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.904, parsimony normed fit index (PNFI) = 0.641, and parsimonious comparative fit index (PCFI) = 0.661. Conclusions. ERAI-N scale had moderate reliability, content validity, and construct validity. Implications for Nursing Management. Designers may use ERAI-N scale to plan the interior layout when design a new ICU. Nurse managers might utilize this instrument as a managing tool to assess whether there is environmental risk factors related to LBP in ICU.

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the fathers' fear of childbirth scale: A cross-sectional study.

Fear of childbirth (FOC) is one of the most common mental health concerns among expectant fathers, which can cause adverse consequences for themselves and their families. A valid and accurate tool is the key to the identification of FOC. This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the fathers' fear of childbirth scale (FFCS) into simplified Chinese and test the scale's psychometric properties among expectant fathers in mainland China. Researchers obtained translation permission and followed the multiphase translation guidelines to develop the Chinese version of the fathers' fear of childbirth scale (C-FFCS). Relevant psychometric properties were selected for the scale's psychometric validation on the basis of the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement Instruments checklist. In this cross-sectional study, two samples of expectant fathers were collected in a university-affiliated hospital in Hangzhou between September and October 2022. A total of 381 expectant fathers completed the C-FFCS, resulting in an effective response rate of 95.6%. The C-FFCS is a 3-factor structure consisting of 16 items, which explained 66.374% of the total variance. The content validity index of items ranged from 0.833 to 1.00, and the scale-level content validity index was 0.931. The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the scale's 3-factor structure. Evidence of convergent validity (average variance extracted = 0.508-0.780) as well as discriminant validity offered excellent psychometric support. The Cronbach's α coefficient, McDonald's ω coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient, Spearman-Brown coefficient, and Guttman split-half coefficient are within the satisfactory range (> 0.80). Significant correlations between the scores of the C-FFCS and Childbirth Attitude Questionnaire (r = 0.658, p < 0.01) and Fear of Birth Scale (r = 0.555, p < 0.01) both revealed good concurrent validity. The structure of C-FFCS was invariant across different parity groups, with no floor and ceiling effect. The C-FFCS was demonstrated to be a sound instrument with good reliability and validity for measuring Chinese expectant fathers' FOC levels. However, further studies are advocated to verify the C-FFCS among a larger sample that is more representative of the Chinese expectant father population.

Validity and reliability of the Professionalism Assessment Scale in Turkish medical students.

Medical professionalism is a basic competency in medical education. This study aimed to adapt the Professionalism Assessment Scale, which is used to evaluate the professionalism attitudes of medical students, into Turkish and to assess its validity and reliability. First, the scale's translation-back-translation was performed and piloted on 30 students. Then, the final scale was applied to medical students to ensure the scale's validity. The Penn State University College of Medicine Professionalism Questionnaire was used for external validation to assess criterion validity. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed for structure validity. Test-retest, item correlations, split-half analysis, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient were evaluated to determine the scale's reliability. SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 24.0 package programs were used for statistical analysis. The statistical significance level was accepted as P<0.05. The mean age of the participants was 21±2 years, and 50.5% (n = 166) were female. Three hundred thirty-five students were invited, and 329 participated in the study. The response rate was 98%. The mean total Professionalism Assessment Scale score was 96.36±12.04. The three-factor structure of the scale, "empathy and humanism," "professional relationship and development," and "responsibility," was confirmed. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.94, and both the Spearman-Brown and Guttman split-half coefficients were 0.89. The three-factor structure of the scale, consisting of 22 items, explained 59.1% of the total variance. The intraclass correlation coefficient between test-retest measurements was 0.81. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a model suitable for the original version of the scale (χ2/sd = 2.814, RMSEA = 0.074). The Turkish version of the Professionalism Assessment Scale is a valid and reliable tool to determine the professionalism attitudes of medical students in Turkey.

The preliminary development and psychometric properties of the Psychotherapy Side Effects Scale

Side effects in psychotherapy are common and have a negative impact on patients or clients. However, effective evaluation tools are still lacking and have not been fully studied. The present study aims to develop a scale with good reliability and validity to measure the side effects of psychotherapy. The 25 items in the Psychotherapy Side Effects Scale (PSES) were condensed and distributed to 420 subjects online to test its psychometric properties. The internal consistency of the PSES was satisfactory to excellent (Cronbach's ɑ coefficient was .95, and the Guttman split-half coefficient was 0.88). A statistically significant negative correlation between the satisfaction score and the total score of the PSES was shown (r=-0.51, p<.001). The PSES could effectively discriminate between two groups with and without side effects (F=250.95, p<.001) and was able to predict the occurrence of side effects in psychotherapy with an area under curve of 0.932 and a 95% confidence interval of 0.900-0.964 (p<.001). A cutoff was set at 36 points in total PSES score, from which the maximum Youden's index (=0.72) could be obtained. The positive rate of the PSES was 24% (101/420). The PSES showed good internal consistency, content validity, concurrent validity, discriminant validity and predictive validity in evaluating and identifying side effects in psychotherapy. More advanced reliability testing methods and structural validity testing for PESE need to be practiced in the future to better serve clinical practice.

A Tool to Measure the Attitude of Farmers Toward Conservation Agriculture

When assessing farmers’ predispositions and developing a strategy for extension work in the region, the attitude of farmers toward conservation agriculture is a crucial consideration. The purpose of this study was to develop a valid and reliable instrument for assessing farmers’ attitudes toward conservation agriculture. The scale product method is used to construct the scale. It is a hybrid of the Likert and Thurstone techniques. The study was conducted in March 2022. On a 5-point scale, 65 judges evaluated 25 statements. Finally, 18 statements including 14 positive statements and 4 negative statements were chosen to build a scale that would assess the attitude of farmers towards conservation agriculture. The scale was found reliable, with the reliability coefficient (r) (Guttman split-half Coefficient and Spearman-Brown Coefficient Equal Length) determined to be 0.917. The scale’s validity was evaluated using expert judgement. Employing the scale in research will aid in knowing farmers’ attitudes about conservation agriculture.