Gustatory Axons Research Articles

Drosophila gustatory projections are segregated by taste modality and connectivity.

Gustatory sensory neurons detect caloric and harmful compounds in potential food and convey this information to the brain to inform feeding decisions. To examine the signals that gustatory neurons transmit and receive, we reconstructed gustatory axons and their synaptic sites in the adult Drosophila melanogaster brain, utilizing a whole-brain electron microscopy volume. We reconstructed 87 gustatory projections from the proboscis labellum in the right hemisphere and 57 from the left, representing the majority of labellar gustatory axons. Gustatory neurons contain a nearly equal number of interspersed pre- and postsynaptic sites, with extensive synaptic connectivity among gustatory axons. Morphology- and connectivity-based clustering revealed six distinct groups, likely representing neurons recognizing different taste modalities. The vast majority of synaptic connections are between neurons of the same group. This study resolves the anatomy of labellar gustatory projections, reveals that gustatory projections are segregated based on taste modality, and uncovers synaptic connections that may alter the transmission of gustatory signals.

Structure and development of the subesophageal zone of the Drosophila brain. II. Sensory compartments.

The subesophageal zone (SEZ) of the Drosophila brain processes mechanosensory and gustatory sensory input from sensilla located on the head, mouth cavity and trunk. Motor output from the SEZ directly controls the movements involved in feeding behavior. In an accompanying paper (Hartenstein et al., ), we analyzed the systems of fiber tracts and secondary lineages to establish reliable criteria for defining boundaries between the four neuromeres of the SEZ, as well as discrete longitudinal neuropil domains within each SEZ neuromere. Here we use this anatomical framework to systematically map the sensory projections entering the SEZ throughout development. Our findings show continuity between larval and adult sensory neuropils. Gustatory axons from internal and external taste sensilla of the larva and adult form two closely related sensory projections, (a) the anterior central sensory center located deep in the ventromedial neuropil of the tritocerebrum and mandibular neuromere, and (b) the anterior ventral sensory center (AVSC), occupying a superficial layer within the ventromedial tritocerebrum. Additional, presumed mechanosensory terminal axons entering via the labial nerve define the ventromedial sensory center (VMSC) in the maxilla and labium. Mechanosensory afferents of the massive array of chordotonal organs (Johnston's organ) of the adult antenna project into the centrolateral neuropil column of the anterior SEZ, creating the antenno-mechanosensory and motor center (AMMC). Dendritic projections of dye back-filled motor neurons extend throughout a ventral layer of the SEZ, overlapping widely with the AVSC and VMSC. Our findings elucidate fundamental structural aspects of the developing sensory systems in Drosophila.

The neurotrophin receptor p75 regulates gustatory axon branching and promotes innervation of the tongue during development.

BackgroundBrain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and neurotrophin-4 (NT4) regulate the survival of gustatory neurons, axon growth and branching, and innervation of taste buds during development. These actions are largely, but not completely, mediated through the tyrosine kinase receptor, TrkB. Here, we investigated the role of p75, the other major receptor for BDNF and NT4, in the development of the taste system.ResultsWe found that p75−/−mice showed delayed axon outgrowth and reduced branching of gustatory axons at embryonic day (E)13.5. From E14.5 to E18.5, gustatory neurons innervated fewer papillae and completely failed to innervate the mid-region of the tongue in p75−/−mice. These early effects of the p75 mutation on gustatory axons preceded the loss of geniculate ganglion neurons starting at E14.5 and also contributed to a loss of taste buds at and after birth. Because knockouts for the TrkB receptor (TrkB−/−) do not lose as many taste buds as hybrid knockouts for its two ligands (BDNF and NT4), we asked if p75 maintains those additional taste buds in the absence of TrkB. It does not; hybrid TrkB−/−/p75−/−mice had more taste buds than TrkB−/−mice; these additional taste buds were not due to an increase in neurons or innervation.Conclusionsp75 regulates gustatory neuron axon branching and tongue innervation patterns during taste system development. This function is likely accomplished independently of BDNF, NT4, and TrkB. In addition, p75 does not support the remaining neurons or taste buds in TrkB−/−mice.

BDNF and NT4 play interchangeable roles in gustatory development

A limited number of growth factors are capable of regulating numerous developmental processes, but how they accomplish this is unclear. The gustatory system is ideal for examining this issue because the neurotrophins brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and neurotrophin-4 (NT4) have different developmental roles although both of them activate the same receptors, TrkB and p75. Here we first investigated whether the different roles of BDNF and NT4 are due to their differences in temporal and spatial expression patterns. Then, we asked whether or not these two neurotrophins exert their unique roles on the gustatory system by regulating different sets of downstream genes. By using BdnfNt4/Nt4 mice, in which the coding region for BDNF is replaced with NT4, we examined whether the different functions of BDNF and NT4 are interchangeable during taste development. Our results demonstrated that NT4 could mediate most of the unique roles of BDNF during taste development. Specifically, caspase-3-mediated cell death, which was increased in the geniculate ganglion in Bdnf−/− mice, was rescued in BdnfNt4/Nt4 mice. In BDNF knockout mice, tongue innervation was disrupted, and gustatory axons failed to reach their targets. However, disrupted innervation was rescued and target innervation is normal when NT4 replaced BDNF. Genome wide expression analyses revealed that BDNF and NT4 mutant mice exhibited different gene expression profiles in the gustatory (geniculate) ganglion. Compared to wild type, the expression of differentiation-, apoptosis- and axon guidance-related genes was changed in BDNF mutant mice, which is consistent with their different roles during taste development. However, replacement of BDNF by NT4 rescued these gene expression changes. These findings indicate that the functions of BDNF and NT4 in taste development are interchangeable. Spatial and temporal differences in BDNF and NT4 expression can regulate differential gene expression in vivo and determine their specific roles during development.

Epithelial-Derived Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Is Required for Gustatory Neuron Targeting during a Critical Developmental Period

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is expressed in epithelial targets of gustatory neurons (i.e., fungiform papillae) before their innervation, and BDNF overexpression in nontaste regions of the tongue misdirects gustatory axons to these sites, suggesting that BDNF is necessary for gustatory axons to locate and innervate their correct targets during development. To test this hypothesis, we examined the targeting of taste neurons in BDNF-null mice (bdnf(-/-)). Analysis of bdnf(-/-) mice using a combination of DiI labeling and electron microscopy revealed that taste regions were not innervated by gustatory axons. Instead, branching was increased and many nontaste regions were innervated. The increased branching by gustatory axons in these animals was facilitated by neurotrophin 4 (NT4), because branching was virtually eliminated in bdnf(-/-)/nt4(-/-) mice. No abnormalities in gustatory innervation patterns and targeting were observed in nt4(-/-) mice. Conditional removal of BDNF selectively in epithelial cells disrupted targeting at the tongue tip, where gene recombination removed bdnf by embryonic day 13.5 (E13.5). However, innervation patterns were normal in the midregion and caudal portions of the tongue, where gene recombination did not occur until E14.5. These findings demonstrate that BDNF derived from gustatory epithelia is required for gustatory axons to correctly locate and innervate fungiform papillae. In addition, they show that BDNF-mediated targeting is restricted to a critical period of development, on or before E13.5.

Factors that regulate embryonic gustatory development

Numerous molecular factors orchestrate the development of the peripheral taste system. The unique anatomy/function of the taste system makes this system ideal for understanding the mechanisms by which these factors function; yet the taste system is underutilized for this role. This review focuses on some of the many factors that are known to regulate gustatory development, and discusses a few topics where more work is needed. Some attention is given to factors that regulate epibranchial placode formation, since gustatory neurons are thought to be primarily derived from this region. Epibranchial placodes appear to arise from a pan-placodal region and a number of regulatory factors control the differentiation of individual placodes. Gustatory neuron differentiation is regulated by a series of transcription factors and perhaps bone morphongenic proteins (BMP). As neurons differentiate, they also proliferate such that their numbers exceed those in the adult, and this is followed by developmental death. Some of these cell-cycling events are regulated by neurotrophins. After gustatory neurons become post-mitotic, axon outgrowth occurs. Axons are guided by multiple chemoattractive and chemorepulsive factors, including semaphorins, to the tongue epithelium. Brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), functions as a targeting factor in the final stages of axon guidance and is required for gustatory axons to find and innervate taste epithelium. Numerous factors are involved in the development of gustatory papillae including Sox-2, Sonic hedge hog and Wnt-β-catenin signaling. It is likely that just as many factors regulate taste bud differentiation; however, these factors have not yet been identified. Studies examining the molecular factors that regulate terminal field formation in the nucleus of the solitary tract are also lacking. However, it is possible that some of the factors that regulate geniculate ganglion development, outgrowth, guidance and targeting of peripheral axons may have the same functions in the gustatory CNS.

Central gustatory projections and side-specificity of operant antennal muscle conditioning in the honeybee

Gustatory stimuli to the antennae, especially sucrose, are important for bees and are employed in learning paradigms as unconditioned stimulus. The present study identified primary antennal gustatory projections in the bee brain and determined the impact of stimulation of the antennal tip on antennal muscle activity and its plasticity. Central projections of antennal taste hairs contained axons of two morphologies projecting into the dorsal lobe, which is also the antennal motor centre. Putative mechanosensory axons arborised in a dorso-lateral area. Putative gustatory axons projected to a ventro-medial area. Bees scan gustatory and mechanical stimuli with their antennae using variable strategies but sensory input to the motor system has not been investigated in detail. Mechanical, gustatory, and electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral antennal tip were found to evoke short-latency responses in an antennal muscle, the fast flagellum flexor. Contralateral gustatory stimulation induced smaller responses with longer latency. The activity of the fast flagellum flexor was conditioned operantly by pairing high muscle activity with ipsilateral antennal sucrose stimulation. A proboscis reward was unnecessary for learning. With contralateral antennal sucrose stimulation, conditioning was unsuccessful. Thus, muscle activity induced by gustatory stimulation was important for learning success and conditioning was side-specific.

Gustatory neurons derived from epibranchial placodes are attracted to, and trophically supported by, taste bud-bearing endoderm in vitro

Taste buds are multicellular receptor organs innervated by the VIIth, IXth, and Xth cranial nerves. In most vertebrates, taste buds differentiate after nerve fibers have reached the lingual epithelium, suggesting that nerves induce taste buds. However, under experimental conditions, taste buds of amphibians develop independently of innervation. Thus, rather than being induced by nerves, the developing taste periphery likely regulates ingrowing nerve fibers. To test this idea, we devised a culture approach using axolotl embryos. Gustatory neurons were generated from cultured epibranchial placodes, and when cultured alone, axon outgrowth was random over 4 days, a time period coincident with axon growth to the periphery in vivo. In contrast, cocultures of placodal neurons with oropharyngeal endoderm (OPE), the normal taste bud-containing target for these neurons, resulted in neurite growth toward the target tissue. Unexpectedly, placodal neurons also grew toward flank ectoderm (FE), which these neurons do not encounter in vivo. To compare further the impact of OPE and FE explants on gustatory neurons, cocultures were extended and examined at 6, 8, and 10 days, when, in vivo, placodal fibers have innervated the epithelium but prior to taste bud formation, when taste buds have differentiated and are innervated, and when the mouth has opened and larvae have begun to feed, respectively. The behavior of placodal axons with respect to target type did not differ between OPE and FE cocultures at 6 days. However, by 8 days, differences in axonal outgrowth were observed with respect to target type, and these differences were enhanced by 10 days in vitro. Most clearly, exuberant placodal fibers grew in 10-day OPE cocultures, and numerous neurites had invaded OPE explants by this time, whereas gustatory neurites were sparse in FE cocultures, and rarely approached and almost never contacted FE explants. Thus, embryonic endoderm destined to give rise to taste buds specifically attracts its innervation early in development, as placodal neurons send out axons. Later, when gustatory axons synapse with differentiated taste buds in vivo, the OPE provides trophic support for cultured gustatory neurons.

Central projections ofDrosophila sensory neurons in the transition from embryo to larva

Sensory axons of different sensory modalities project into typical domains within insect ganglia. Tactile and gustatory axons project into a ventral layer of neuropil and proprioceptive afferents, including chordotonal axons, into an intermediate or dorsal layer. Here, we describe the central projections of sensory neurons in the first instar Drosophila larva, relating them to the projection of the same sensory afferents in the embryo and to sensory afferents of similar type in other insects. Several neurons show marked morphologic changes in their axon terminals in the transition between the embryo and larva. During a short morphogenetic period late in embryogenesis, the axon terminals of the dorsal bipolar dendrite stretch receptor change their shape and their distribution within the neuromere. In the larva, external sense organ neurons (es) project their axons into a ventral layer of neuropil. Chordotonal sensory neurons (ch) project into a slightly more dorsal region that is comparable to their projection in adults. The multiple dendrite (md) neurons show two distinctive classes of projection. One group of md neurons projects into the ventral-most neuropil region, the same region into which es neurons project. Members of this group are related by lineage to es neurons or share a requirement for expression of the same proneural gene during development. Other md neurons project into a more dorsal region. Sensory receptors projecting into dorsal neuropil possibly provide proprioceptive feedback from the periphery to central motorneurons and are candidates for future genetic and cellular analysis of simple neural circuitry.

Localization of unmyelinated axons in rat skin and mucocutaneous tissue utilizing the isolectin GS-I-B

The a-D-galactose specific isolectin I-B4 from Griffonia simplicifolia (GS-I-B4) labels CNS microglia and certain peripheral neurons, including a subpopulation of small dark, type B dorsal root ganglion cells, some post-ganglionic sympathetic axons, and nearly all peripheral gustatory axons. The innervation patterns of GS-I-B4 reactive sensory ganglion cells are unknown for many peripheral target tissues, including their probable primary target, the skin. The present study describes the distribution of GS-I-B4 reactive axons in hairy and glabrous hindpaw skin and in the glans penis of rats, using both single and double-labelling histochemical techniques. Neuronal processes were identified using (1) histochemistry with horseradish peroxidase conjugated GS-I-B4 or (2) immunohistochemistry against PGP 9.5 to identify all axons, and biotinylated lectin histochemistry with avidin-FITC to identify the subpopulation of GS-I-B4 reactive axons. GS-I-B4 strongly labelled unmyelinated cutaneous sensory afferents, as well as some sympathetic efferents and visceral afferents. Lectin reactive axons were seen to innervate the upper hair shaft epidermis in hairy skin, and were abundant in the shallow dermis in hairy and glabrous skin and glans penis. Lectin reactive axons were also abundant in the lamina propria and distal urethral epithelium of the penis. These results provide new evidence for the cutaneous sensory role of GS-I-B4 reactive primary afferents, as well as evidence to support the contention that the lectin is a specific marker for a subpopulation of unmyelinated axons and not simply a marker for the myelination state of an axon.

Alterations in geniculate ganglion proteins following fungiform receptor damage

Previous anatomical studies in rat have shown that damage produced to fungiform receptors of the anterior tongue at postnatal age 2 (P2[ alters the growth and ramification of primary gustatory axons in the rostral nucleus of the solitary tract (NST). Studies employing artificial rearing (AR) procedures, which functionally deprive rat pups of orochemical stimulation during critical periods of postnatal life, produce similar alterations in the development of primary gustatory axons in the NST. Therefore, orochemical stimulation during rat's early postnatal life is necessary for normal development of primary gustatory axons in the rostral NST. One hypothesis concerning receptor-damage effects and AR effects is that receptor damage during critical periods of development may alter the regulation (i.e. transcription/ translation) and/or distribution (i.e. transport) of proteins in geniculate ganglion neurons, thereby affecting growth of primary gustatory axons in the rostra] NST. Specific aims of the present experiments were to comprehensively examine electrophoretic profiles of geniculate ganglion proteins following P2 receptor damage and late (> P40) receptor damage. Results show that concentrations of particular geniculate ganglion proteins are differentially altered following P2 receptor damage and late receptor damage, and that early receptor damage and late receptor damage produces distinct effects on the electrophoretic profiles of particular classes of proteins. Between the ages of P7-P38, P2 receptor damage lowers ganglion concentration of an acidic membrane glycoprotein designated as A1, with an apparent M r of 64–67 kDa and a pI of 4.8–5.2. P2 receptor damage also lowers ganglion concentrations of GAP-43. P2 receptor damage produces transient decreases in ganglion concentrations of NF-160, NF-200, and 8 additional acidic proteins. Three of these proteins may correspond to peripheral nerve sheath proteins analyzed in previous studies of the sciatic nerve, and one of these proteins may correspond to a 24 kDa growth-associated protein characterized in regenerating optic nerve. The time-course for changes observed in ganglion proteins following P2 damage was consistent with that observed for normal anatomical development of primary gustatory axons in both the lingual epithelium and NST. Receptor damage produced at P40 and later yielded different patterns of changes in geniculate ganglion proteins. Late receptor damage produced a transient increase in ganglion concentrations of NF-160, NF-200, GAP-43 and four additional acidic proteins within the 29–57 kDa M r range. Late receptor damage also produced a transient decrease in the concentrations of protein A1 and a 30 kDa protein that was not affected by P2 damage. Therefore, proteins that were preferentially affected by P2 damage may be involved in the regulation of initial axonal growth within the lingual epithelium and NST, as opposed to the structural repair or maintenance of extant axons. Relationships between normal anatomical development in peripheral and central components of primary gustatory axons are discussed in relation to availability of particular cytoskeletal and growth-associated proteins.

Effects of orochemical stimulation on postnatal development of gustatory recipient zones within the nucleus of the solitary tract

Previous receptor damage studies and artificial rearing (AR) studies in rat have demonstrated that orochemical stimulation between the postnatal ages of P2 and P14 is necessary for development of primary gustatory axons and terminal endings in the rostral nucleus of the solitary tract (NST). Objectives of the present experiment were to evaluate the qualitative nature of orochemical stimulation and amount of orochemical stimulation that is necessary to produce normal axonal and terminal development in gustatory recipient zones of the rostral and intermediate NST. To this end, ultra-pure water, 30,150, and 500 mM NaCl, 80 and 340 mM lactose, whole rat milk, and rat milk that had been subject to extensive dialysis (12–14 kD MWCO) was delivered to independent groups of rat pups during AR procedures. Unstimulated AR animals and matched mother-reared (MR) animals were used as controls. AR animals received experimental orochemical stimulation between the ages of P4 and P10, and were there-after returned to lactating dams until the time of weaning; MR animals received experimental orochemical stimulation during the course of normal nursing. Following maturation, anterograde fluorescent dual-labeling experiments were conducted to map the course and distribution of primary gustatory axons within the NST. Results show that experimental stimulation with water during AR procedures is not sufficient to produce normal development of primary gustatory axons and terminal endings in the gustatory NST. Stimulation with 30,150, and 500 mM NaCl produced normal axonal development in the NST, as did 80 and 340 mM lactose, whole rat milk, and hdialyzed rat milk. These results indicate that orochemical stimulation with qualitatively different tastants during critical periods of postnatal development is sufficient to produce normal development of primary gustatory axons within the rostral NST. In a second experiment, rat pups received either 1 day or 3 days of stimulation with 150 mM NaCl to determine the time-course of stimulation necessary to produce normal development of terminal fields in the rostral NST. Results indicated that 1 day of stimulation with NaCl was not sufficient to produce normal development of rostral NST axons, whereas 3 days stimulation with NaCl was effective in producing normal axonal development. Therefore, like other sensory systems, the gustatory system is susceptible to anatomical modification by taste stimulation during critical or sensitive periods of postnatal development.

NCAM expression by subsets of taste cells is dependent upon innervation.

The expression of the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) and distinct carbohydrate groups by cells of the taste buds of the rat vallate papilla was investigated by immunohistochemical and biochemical techniques. We employed antibodies against 1) the extracellular (mAb 3F4) and cytoplasmic (mAb 5B8) portions of the NCAM polypeptide, 2) the highly sialylated form of NCAM (mAb 5A5), 3) carbohydrate epitopes associated with glycosylated NCAM forms in the rat (mAb 2B8) or frog (mAb 9-OE) olfactory system, and also 4) the Lewisb blood group carbohydrate epitope (mAb CO431). NCAM mRNA was demonstrated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in samples of the vallate papilla, suggesting the presence of NCAM in cells of the taste buds. Antibodies against NCAM (mAbs 3F4 and 5B8) recognized a subset (about 20%) of cells within the vallate taste buds; fibers of the glossopharyngeal nerve, including those innervating the gustatory epithelium, were NCAM immunoreactive. Taste bud cells did not express polysialic acid (mAb 5A5), but mAb 5A5 immunoreactivity was observed on fibers of the IXth nerve, including a few that entered the taste buds. All or nearly all of the cells within the vallate taste buds were immunoreactive to mAb 2B8, whereas mAbs 9-OE and CO431 reacted with subsets of cells. The carbohydrates recognized by mAbs 2B8 and 9-OE were also abundantly expressed in the ducts and acini of the lingual salivary glands. Bilateral crush of the IXth nerve resulted in the loss of expression of all of these molecules from the gustatory epithelium. If cells of the taste bud express NCAM during their final stage(s) of differentiation, then NCAM could play a role(s) in the growth of gustatory axons toward their target epithelial cells and in the recognition between the nerve fibers and mature taste receptor cells, or among the taste bud cells themselves.

Postnatal development of gustatory recipient zones within the nucleus of the solitary tract

Previous studies have examined pre- and postsynaptic development of the first-order central gustatory relay, located in the rostral nucleus of the solitary tract (NST). This region of the NST is innervated by primary gustatory axons arising from the facial-intermediate nerve. However, a large portion of the gustatory NST is innervated by axons arising from the glossopharyngeal nerve and although the time course for development of N.VII recipient zones has been defined development of glossopharyngeal afferent terminal fields has not been examined. Moreover, the time course for development of projection neurons located postsynaptic to gustatory afferent axons has not been examined in any portion of the NST. The objectives of the present study were to 1. 1) define the time course for development of N.VII and N.IX terminal fields and 2. 2) examine temporal relationships between development of afferent terminal fields and development of projection neurons located postsynaptic to gustatory afferent axons. To this end, triple fluorescent labeling procedures were used to simultaneously visualize developing axons and projection neurons. Results show that afferent terminal fields develop along the rostrocaudal axis of the NST. Axons of the N.VII terminal field are present in the rostral NST at P1 and develop to approximately P25. Axons and terminal endings of N.IX do not enter the NST until approximately P9-P10 and these terminal fields develop within the intermediate NST until approximately P45. Many NST neurons destined to project axons to the second-order central gustatory relay, located in the caudal parabrachial nucleus (PBN), do not possess axonal connections with the PBN during the first 2–3 weeks of postnatal life. As afferent terminal fields develop, these neurons establish connections with the PBN between the ages of approximately P7 and P45–P60. The delay between afferent terminal field development and development of PBN projection neurons in the N.VII terminal field is approximately 3 weeks. The delay between pre- and postsynaptic development in the N.IX terminal field is approximately 1 week. Potential relationships between pre- and postsynaptic development are discussed, in addition to relationships between anatomical development in the NST and the emergence of taste-guided behaviors.

Analysis of taste bud innervation based on glycoconjugate and peptide neuronal markers

Primary gustatory neurons and their peripheral and central processes were evaluated histochemically in the geniculate and petrosal cranial nerve ganglia, lingual fungiform taste buds, and the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST) using 1) the plant lectin Griffonia simplicifolia I-B4, which binds specifically to D-galactose residues and selectively labels primarily nonpeptide-containing peripheral somatosensory neurons, and 2) calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactivity (CGRP-IR), which labels most peptidergic somatosensory neurons. Lectin reactivity was expressed by the vast majority of geniculate and petrosal ganglion cells, while CGRP-IR labeled very few cells. Peripherally, gustatory intragemmal axons penetrating fungiform taste buds were labeled only by the lectin and were depleted following chorda tympani transection. However, both lectin-labeled and CGRP-IR subpopulations of somatosensory perigemmal axons surrounding the taste buds were observed and were eliminated by section of the lingual nerve. The differing brainstem projection patterns of lectin-reactive vs. CGRP-IR central axons reflected their distinct ganglionic origins and the differential distributions of lectin reactivity and CGRP-IR among taste buds. Central lectin-reactive terminals were found throughout the entire rostrocaudal extent of the NST, including its rostral lateral "gustatory" zone; the extensive lectin-reactive visceral afferent projection can be presumed to have originated mainly from the large proportion of lectin-labeled neurons in the nodose ganglion. The lectin also prominently and selectively labeled the area postrema. CGRP-IR central terminals, however, was relatively sparse and restricted primarily to the caudal and medial "visceral" divisions of the NST. The results are discussed with respect to the possible functional implications of cell surface glycoconjugate expression by gustatory axons innervating taste bud receptor cells of the tongue.

Genetic control of sexually dimorphic axon morphology in Drosophila sensory neurons

The mechanism by which orderly axonal projections are formed during development remains an important and largely unsolved problem in neurobiology. It may be possible to examine the control of axon growth in Drosophila and take advantage of genetic tools to better understand the phenomenon. We show here that some gustatory axons in Drosophila are sexually dimorphic and that genes involved in sex determination control the anatomy of these axons. Both males and females possess gustatory receptors on their legs but males possess more of these receptors than females. More significantly, the axons of the male receptors usually cross the midline and they never do so in females, indicating a central zone of bilateral input in the male but not in the female nervous system. In chromosomal females, expressing a tra or Sxl mutation, the gustatory system is transformed toward the male phenotype. Mutant XX adults resemble normal males externally, because they have more gustatory receptors, and internally, because their axons cross the midline. Gynandromorphs show that the sex of the sensory neuron, and apparently not the central nervous system, controls the growth of the axons. We conclude that the anatomical site of control for this dimorphism is the gustatory neurons.

Collateral reinnervation of taste buds after chronic sensory denervation: a morphological study.

Peripheral transganglionic transport of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was used to label afferent fibers in the taste buds and lingual epithelium 2-12 weeks after chronic chorda tympani or combined chorda tympani-lingual nerve lesions. From 4-12 weeks after a chronic chorda tympani lesion, taste buds could be found. These were innervated by fibers from the ipsilateral lingual nerve. From 8-12 weeks after a chronic chorda tympani-lingual nerve lesion, nerve fibers from the contralateral lingual nerve could be found in a few taste buds on the denervated side of the tongue. Thus, collateral sprouting took place over the midline in this instance. These findings indicate that intact gustatory axons do not sprout into denervated taste buds, but trigeminal fibers in the lingual nerve do have this ability.

Trophic capacity of experimentally lengthened gustatory axons

Long nerve stumps will maintain end-organs for a longer period of time than short nerve stumps. However, longer maintenance might result not from a longer nerve stump per se but from uncontrolled factors such as less interference with the target's blood supply when transecting a nerve far from its target. To control for the site of nerve transection and to evaluate the trophic capacity of lengthened axons, we extended the gerbil's ( Meriones unguiculatus) IXth nerve (glossopharyngeal) by splicing in a 5.0 mm segment of the superior laryngeal nerve. Thus, when assessing nerve stump-length dependency 3–5 months later, both the control regenerated nerve and the lengthened experimental nerve could be transected at the same site on the IXth nerve trunk. The peak magnitude of the summated taste discharges of the experimentally lengthened IXth nerve declined at a rate exactly predicted by an earlier study of nerve stump-length dependency. We conclude that maintenance of synaptic transmission depends upon taste axon stump-length and not upon factors uncontrolled in conventional experimental designs of stump-length dependency which transect nerves at different locations. Control regenerated and experimentally lengthened nerves maintained similar numbers of taste buds. Thus, neither the added burden of maintaining longer axons nor the presence of Schwann cells of the superior laryngeal nerve splice degraded the IXth nerve's trophic performance.

Fetal development of primate chemosensory corpuscles. II. Synaptic relationships in early gestation.

Fungiform papillae contained well-developed chemosensory corpuscles in macaque monkey fetuses with crown-rump lengths of 5.0-9.0 cm. These fetuses corresponded to stages from the last part of the first and beginning of the second trimester of gestation. Chemosensory cells extended from the epithelial basal lamina to the taste pore anlage at the apex of the corpuscle and had typical afferent synaptic contacts with presumptive gustatory axons. Apical secretory granules, the distinctive cytologic feature of sustentacular cells, were absent. Cells with cytologic characteristics intermediate between chemosensory cells and basal extragemmal cells were considered to be differentiating chemosensory (DC) cells and appeared to arise from existing basal cells as well as undifferentiated postmitotic cells. Although extragemmal cells were extensively coupled by gap junctions which are apparent in electron micrographs of thin sections, similar junctions were absent from chemosensory and DC cells. While having minimal structural requirements for transduction and transmission of sapid stimuli (i.e., an intraoral surface and afferent synaptic contacts) chemosensory cells lacked efferent synapses and subsurface cisternae, which can be observed at later stages of gestation. Axoaxonic synapses, present between gustatory axons in the intragemmal and extragemmal epithelium and in the subgemmal connective tissue, were observed with greater frequency than at later stages of gestation. We conclude that the differentiation of chemosensory cells precedes the differentiation of sustentacular cells by several weeks. This fact lends support to the concept that chemosensory cells are a unique identifiable cells type in all chemosensory corpuscles.

The gustatory system in mammals

Taste buds occur in five distinct populations in the mammalian oral cavity. The chemical sensitivity of these receptors varies from one population to another and among species as well. Taste buds degenerate when denervated and reappear when gustatory axons reinvade an area. Branches of three cranial nerves--VII, IX, and X--convey gustatory information to the medulla, where they terminate in the rostral two thirds of the nucleus of the solitary tract. Individual gustatory afferent fibers normally respond to several classes of sapid chemicals; they are broadly tuned. The tuning, however, is not random. For a given neuron, the best stimulus predicts the order of effectiveness of other stimulus qualities. Taste neurons in the first and second central relays, in the medualla and pons, respectively, are even more broadly tuned than those on the periphery but maintain a similar orderliness in the effectiveness of different sapid qualities. Much less is known about the response properties of taste neurons in more rostral areas. Even the basic anatomy of the gustatory system in the forebrain remains in question, because its organization differs in rodents and primates.