Guidelines For Preventive Services Research Articles

Practice Facilitation Improves Adolescent Reproductive Health Preventive Services in Primary Care.

Provision of reproductive health preventive services to adolescents is critical given their high rates of sexually transmitted infections and unintended pregnancies. Pediatricians are well positioned to provide these services but often face barriers. With this project, we aimed to build quality improvement (QI) capacity within pediatric practices to improve adherence to national guidelines for adolescent reproductive health preventive services. In 2016, an accountable care organization overseeing health care delivery for low-income children in the Midwestern United States used practice facilitation, a proven approach to improve health care quality, to support pediatric practices in implementing reproductive health QI projects. Interested practices pursued projects aimed at providing (1) sexual risk reduction and contraceptive counseling (reproductive health assessments [RHAs]) or (2) etonogestrel implants. QI specialists helped practices build key driver diagrams and implement interventions. Outcome measures included the proportion of well-care visits with RHAs completed and number of etonogestrel insertions performed monthly. Between November 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019, 6 practices serving >7000 adolescents pursued QI projects. Among practices focused on RHAs, the proportion of well-care visits with completed RHAs per month increased from 0% to 65.8% (P < .001) within 18 months. Among practices focused on etonogestrel implant insertions, overall insertions per month increased from 0 to 8.5 (P < .001). Practice facilitation is an effective way to increase adherence to national guidelines for adolescent reproductive health preventive services within primary care practices. Success was driven by practice-specific customization of interventions and ongoing, hands-on support.

Electronic Health Risk Behavior Screening With Integrated Feedback Among Adolescents in Primary Care: Randomized Controlled Trial.

BackgroundHealth risk behaviors are the most common sources of morbidity among adolescents. Adolescent health guidelines (Guidelines for Preventive Services by the AMA and Bright Futures by the Maternal Child Health Bureau) recommend screening and counseling, but the implementation is inconsistent.ObjectiveThis study aims to test the efficacy of electronic risk behavior screening with integrated patient-facing feedback on the delivery of adolescent-reported clinician counseling and risk behaviors over time.MethodsThis was a randomized controlled trial comparing an electronic tool to usual care in five pediatric clinics in the Pacific Northwest. A total of 300 participants aged 13-18 years who attended a well-care visit between September 30, 2016, and January 12, 2018, were included. Adolescents were randomized after consent by employing a 1:1 balanced age, sex, and clinic stratified schema with 150 adolescents in the intervention group and 150 in the control group. Intervention adolescents received electronic screening with integrated feedback, and the clinicians received a summary report of the results. Control adolescents received usual care. Outcomes, assessed via online survey methods, included adolescent-reported receipt of counseling during the visit (measured a day after the visit) and health risk behavior change (measured at 3 and 6 months after the visit).ResultsOf the original 300 participants, 94% (n=282), 94.3% (n=283), and 94.6% (n=284) completed follow-up surveys at 1 day, 3 months, and 6 months, respectively, with similar levels of attrition across study arms. The mean risk behavior score at baseline was 2.86 (SD 2.33) for intervention adolescents and 3.10 (SD 2.52) for control adolescents (score potential range 0-21). After adjusting for age, gender, and random effect of the clinic, intervention adolescents were 36% more likely to report having received counseling for endorsed risk behaviors than control adolescents (adjusted rate ratio 1.36, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.78) 1 day after the well-care visit. Both the intervention and control groups reported decreased risk behaviors at the 3- and 6-month follow-up assessments, with no significant group differences in risk behavior scores at either time point (3-month group difference: β=−.15, 95% CI −0.57 to −0.01, P=.05; 6-month group difference: β=−.12, 95% CI −0.29 to 0.52, P=.57).ConclusionsAlthough electronic health screening with integrated feedback improves the delivery of counseling by clinicians, the impact on risk behaviors is modest and, in this study, not significantly different from usual care. More research is needed to identify effective strategies to reduce risk in the context of well-care.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02882919; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02882919

Abstract PO-262: Achieving health equity in cancer preventive services: NIH Workshop insights on barriers and the effectiveness of evidence-based interventions and strategies

Abstract Background: Evidence-based guidelines for preventive services are developed by expert groups such as the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) to help Americans stay healthy. Despite the proven value of evidence-based preventive services (e.g., screenings, provider counseling, and preventive medications), implementation by providers and uptake by patients vary, contributing to disparities in disease burden and life expectancy. The NIH convened a workshop with multidisciplinary and multisector participants in June 2019 to assess the available scientific evidence on achieving health equity in the use of clinical preventive services for three leading causes of death: diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. Methods: The workshop was framed around five key questions (KQ) and included a systematic evidence review, speaker presentations, and public discussion. KQ 1-2 considered the effects of barriers on the part of providers and patients to adopting and implementing evidence-based preventive services, and how they contribute to health disparities. KQ 3-5 addressed the effectiveness of health information technology and health care organization interventions to reduce disparities in preventive services use. An unbiased, independent panel of experts considered the scientific evidence in addition to speaker and audience perspectives to develop a report of findings and recommendations for addressing disparities in the use of ten clinical preventive services recommended by the USPSTF. Results: Overall, the need for more research on the effects of barriers was identified. However, compared with heart disease and diabetes, the barriers to adopting preventive services for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening have received greater attention. While patient navigation was shown to be effective in increasing cancer screening rates, strategies for bundling preventive services and implementing health information technologies require more study. The importance of addressing unmet basic needs related to health and enhancing community resources to reduce disparities were recurring themes throughout the workshop. Lastly, there were implications for more research in cancer dissemination and implementation. Conclusion: Chronic diseases, including heart disease, cancer, and diabetes, are responsible for seven of every ten deaths in the U.S. each year. Greater use of proven clinical preventive services could avert the loss of millions of life-years. Achieving health equity in preventive services is feasible, but requires efforts at the patient, provider, healthcare organization, and community levels, and greater attention to addressing social determinants of health. Citation Format: Antoinette Percy-Laurry, Richard Berzon, Jennifer Croswell, Carrie Klabunde, Melissa Green Parker, LeShawndra Price, Pamela Thornton, Kate Winseck, Xinzhi Zhang. Achieving health equity in cancer preventive services: NIH Workshop insights on barriers and the effectiveness of evidence-based interventions and strategies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: Thirteenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2020 Oct 2-4. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(12 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-262.

Implementation of Evidence-Based Recommendations for Preventive Services in the Veterans Health Administration.

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is the largest integrated health care system in the United States. To date, there has been scant research on how VHA adopts clinical preventive services guidelines and how U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations factor into the process. Researchers conducted semistructured interviews with eight VHA leaders to examine how they adopt, disseminate, and measure adherence to recommendations. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and aggregated into a database to enable sorting and synthesis. Themes were identified across the key informant interviews. The development of VHA clinical prevention guidelines is coordinated by the National Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. A VHA Advisory Committee discusses and votes to approve or disapprove each guideline. Several factors can impact the ability of a veterans affairs medical center to implement a guideline, such as local system capacity and priorities for quality improvement. Methods to promote implementation include electronic reminders, educational events, and a robust performance measurement system. Provision of evidence-based clinical preventive services is an important part of VHA's effort to provide high-quality care for Veterans. Recent achievements in lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and Hepatitis C screening highlight VHA's successful approach to implementation of preventive services guidance.

Variation of preventive service utilization by state Medicaid coverage, cost-sharing, and Medicaid expansion status

Preventive services can help reduce costs associated with chronic conditions. Medicaid beneficiaries have high rates of chronic conditions, but state Medicaid coverage and cost-sharing of preventive services varies widely. States that chose to expand Medicaid under the ACA were incentivized to cover recommended preventive services at no cost-sharing. This study evaluates whether state Medicaid policy and Medicaid expansion were associated with overall utilization, and disparities in utilization of preventive services among vulnerable populations.We used Medicaid policy data from Kaiser Family Foundation and MEPS data (2009–2014, n = 15,610), collected and analyzed in 2017. We used multivariable logistic regression, difference-in-differences, and difference-in-difference-in-differences models to examine the association between state Medicaid preventive service policy and Medicaid expansion on overall utilization, and disparities in utilization among race/ethnicity and income groups for blood pressure check, cholesterol screening, and flu shot.Medicaid coverage of flu shot was significantly associated with utilization (p < 0.001). Medicaid expansion significantly increased flu shot utilization among near-poor individuals (p < 0.01), Asians, and Latinos and blood pressure screening among African Americans (p < 0.05).For flu shot, the ACA is reaching its target audience: those in the coverage gap between Medicaid and private insurance. Increasing access to preventive services may not be enough to increase utilization, especially for vulnerable populations and/or the previously uninsured. Focusing on provider adherence to preventive service guidelines and education around who is eligible for what service and when could help increase utilization of preventive services in the future.

Framework for Using Risk Stratification to Improve Clinical Preventive Service Guidelines

People should only receive a preventive service if the potential benefits of the service outweigh the potential harms. Both benefits and risks may vary for different populations. Thus, it is clinically important to understand when and how guidelines for preventive services should be stratified according to the underlying risk of the population. For example, preventive services may be risk stratified with specific clinical recommendations based on age, sex, race/ethnicity, family history, genotype, behavior risks, or comorbidities. This paper articulates the conceptual approach and practical tools that were developed for consideration by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force to determine if and how risk stratification should be incorporated into clinical guidelines. This approach is described in an algorithm with six sequential questions: (1) Are there clinically relevant subpopulations? (2) Are there credible subgroup analyses for these subpopulations? (3) Do subgroup analyses show clinically important differences? (4) Do these differences result in variation of net benefit, or does the evidence only exist in persons with a narrow spectrum of risk? (5) Can the subpopulations be easily identified? and (6) Does a well-validated multivariate risk tool improve identification of clinically relevant subpopulations compared with a simpler approach? This framework allows for a systematic approach to determine if and how to incorporate evidence for specific populations, a consistent application of critical thinking about this evidence, and transparent communication about the derivation of risk-stratified recommendations or evidence gaps.

Large Health Systems’ Prevention Guideline Implementation: A Qualitative Study

Health systems now employ more than half of U.S. physicians. They have the potential to affect primary care through decision support and financial incentives around clinical prevention guidelines. The processes by which they respond to and implement clinical guidelines remain largely unexplored. In 2015, the research team conducted and analyzed interviews with quality leaders from eight hospital-based systems and one physician organization which together employ >33,000 physicians and serve >15 million patients. Executives explained organizational processes to adapt, adopt, disseminate, and incentivize adherence to preventive services guidelines. Nearly all have a formal process for reviewing and refining guidelines, developing clinician support, and disseminating the approved guidelines. Internal and external factors like organizational structure, patient demographics, and payer contracts affect the review processes and resulting guideline adaptations. Challenges to guideline uptake include competing demands on clinician time and the absence of accurate and timely patient data in accessible and user-friendly formats. Interviewees reported that engaging clinicians in guideline review is critical to successful implementation. Electronic health record reminders represent the primary tool for guideline dissemination and reinforcement. Interviewees reported widespread use of performance monitoring and feedback to clinicians, with varying levels of success. Most organizations use financial incentives tied to performance for some of their clinicians, although details vary widely depending on network structures and contractual arrangements. Health systems play a critical intermediary role between guideline-developing organizations and practicing clinicians. Strengthening the adoption of guidelines requires attention to many factors beyond care delivery.

Association Between Adolescent Preventive Care and the Role of the Affordable Care Act

Despite decades of adolescent preventive well visit and services promotion (Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services and Bright Futures), rates are below recommended levels and little is known of the effect of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) implementation on these care rates. To use Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data to determine (1) whether adolescent well visit rates increased from the pre-ACA period to post-ACA period, and (2) whether caregivers' reports of past-year preventive services delivery increased from the pre- to post-ACA period among adolescents with any past-year health care visit. Secondary data analysis of 2007-2009 (before ACA implementation) and 2012-2014 (after ACA implementation) Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data on the differences in well visits and preventive services. Data were collected through computer-assisted personal interviews of caregivers of a nationally representative sample of a noninstitutionalized US population (n = 25 695 10- to 17-year-old adolescents). For objective 1, pre- to post-ACA period differences in past-year well visits: (1) stratified bivariable logistic regressions identifying subgroup rate differences and (2) multivariable analyses controlling for demographic factors. For objective 2, pre- to post-ACA period differences in caregiver reports of preventive services receipt, including time alone with clinician: (1) bivariable (year differences) and (2) multivariable logistic regressions controlling for demographic variables. A total of 6279 (50.9%) and 6730 (50.8%) participating adolescents in the pre- and post-ACA period data were male, respectively. Under objective 1, we found that well-visit rates increased from 41% to 48% post-ACA implementation (odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2-1.5); minority and low-income groups had the greatest increases. Under objective 2, we found that among those with any past-year visit, most preventive services rates (8 of 9) increased post-ACA implementation (range, 2%-9%, absolute), with little or no change when controlling for demographic variables. Time alone with clinicians increased 1%, significant only when covariates were controlled (adjusted odds ratio, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.3). Despite modest to moderate increases, with greatest gains for underserved youth, adolescent preventive care rates remain low, highlighting the need for increased efforts to bring adolescents into well care and improve clinician delivery of preventive care within their practices.

ANÁLISIS DE LAS NECESIDADES PSICOSOCIALES Y FACTORES DE RIESGO ASOCIADOS AL ÉXITO O FRACASO ACADÉMICO DEL ALUMNADO DE EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR

Abstract:Both psychosocial needs and risk factors that affect academic performance in a sample of 2014 participants in higher education are described. The results may be generalised to students from Spanish universities and can provide guidelines for preventive actions and psychological services in the context of comprehensive providing services to graduate and undergraduate students.Keywords: psychosocial needs, counseling service, higher educationResumen:Se describen las necesidades psicosociales y los factores de riesgo que afectan al rendimiento académico en una muestra de estudiantes de educación superior. Los resultados obtenidos pueden ser generalizables al alumnado que cursa sus estudios en las universidades españolas y puede ofrecer pautas de acción para desarrollar actividades preventivas a los servicios universitarios de atención psicológica y psicopedagógica en el marco de la atención integral al alumnado universitario.Palabras claves: necesidades psicosociales, servicio de atención psicológica, educación superior.

Adherence to the Women's Preventive Services Guidelines in the Affordable Care Act

ObjectiveTo assess the adherence of women's health providers in New Mexico to the Women's Preventive Services Guidelines and to examine how providers' knowledge, attitudes, and external barriers are associated with adherence. DesignCross-sectional, descriptive survey. SettingNew Mexico. ParticipantsWomen's health providers in New Mexico, including nurse practitioners, certified nurse-midwives, and family practice and obstetrician-gynecologist physicians. MethodsParticipants completed a self-administered survey to measure knowledge, attitudes, external barriers, and adherence to each of the eight guidelines. Adherence was defined as following a guideline more than 90% of the time. ResultsThe response rate was 22% (399/1,798). Among the eight guidelines, participant adherence ranged from 17.2% to 88.4%. Only 39.7% of participants indicated adherence to most of the guidelines (four or more). Overall, provider adherence was directly associated with familiarity with the guidelines (odds ratio = 3.69; 95% confidence interval [1.96, 6.96]), self-efficacy to implement them (odds ratio = 4.25; 95% confidence interval [2.21, 8.20]), and younger age (odds ratio = 0.97; 95% confidence interval [0.94, 1.00]). ConclusionAdherence to the Women's Preventive Services Guidelines by providers in New Mexico is variable and, for many recommended practices, less than optimal. New targeted implementation strategies are needed to address barriers to adherence.

Making Health Changes: Following Preventive Service Guidelines and Changing Behavior Among Individuals With Serious Mental Illnesses

Making Health Changes: Following Preventive Service Guidelines and Changing Behavior Among Individuals With Serious Mental Illnesses

Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Evidence-Based Guidelines for and Against Clinical Preventive Services: Results from a National Survey.

Both the underuse and overuse of clinical preventive services relative to evidence-based guidelines are a public health concern. Informed consumers are an important foundation of many components of the Affordable Care Act, including coverage mandates for proven clinical preventive services recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force. Across sociodemographic groups, however, knowledge of and positive attitudes toward evidence-based guidelines for preventive care are extremely low. Given the demonstrated low levels of consumers' knowledge of and trust in guidelines, coupled with their strong preference for involvement in preventive care decisions, better education and decision-making support for evidence-based preventive services are greatly needed. Both the underuse and overuse of clinical preventive services are a serious public health problem. The goal of our study was to produce population-based national data that could assist in the design of communication strategies to increase knowledge of and positive attitudes toward evidence-based guidelines for clinical preventive services (including the US Preventive Services Task Force, USPSTF) and to reduce uncertainty among patients when guidelines change or are controversial. In late 2013 we implemented an Internet-based survey of a nationally representative sample of 2,529 adults via KnowledgePanel, a probability-based survey panel of approximately 60,000 adults, statistically representative of the US noninstitutionalized population. African Americans, Hispanics, and those with less than a high school education were oversampled. We then conducted descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify the prevalence of and sociodemographic characteristics associated with key knowledge and attitudinal variables. While 36.4% of adults reported knowing that the Affordable Care Act requires insurance companies to cover proven preventive services without cost sharing, only 7.7% had heard of the USPSTF. Approximately 1 in 3 (32.6%) reported trusting that a government task force would make fair guidelines for preventive services, and 38.2% believed that the government uses guidelines to ration health care. Most of the respondents endorsed the notion that research/scientific evidence and expert medical opinion are important for the creation of guidelines and that clinicians should follow guidelines based on evidence. But when presented with patient vignettes in which a physician made a guideline-based recommendation against a cancer-screening test, less than 10% believed that this recommendation alone, without further dialogue and/or the patient's own research, was sufficient to make such a decision. Given these demonstrated low levels of knowledge and mistrust regarding guidelines, coupled with a strong preference for shared decision making, better consumer education and decision supports for evidence-based guidelines for clinical preventive services are greatly needed.

Adherence to clinical preventive services guidelines: Population-based online randomized trial

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) addresses use of clinical preventive services relative to evidence-based guidelines by mandating that most health insurance plans provide coverage without cost-sharing for services that receive an A or B rating. However, knowledge about and positive attitudes towards guidelines are extremely low.This study was a population-based randomized experiment to examine beliefs about and intentions to adhere to screening guidelines for the Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) and Pap tests. The study had two objectives: (1) test reactions to and understanding of guidelines, and (2) experimentally compare receptivity to messages to promote PSA and Pap test recommendations. We first surveyed a population-based sample of (1) US adults age 18 and over, (2) subsample of women aged 65 or younger, (3) subsample of men aged 40 or older. A sample of 2923 completed an initial questionnaire. Next a subset of participants meeting eligibility criteria were recruited from the population-based sample into a message testing experiment: (1) women aged 65 or younger, (2) and men aged 40 or older. Participants meeting these eligibility requirements were randomized to gain, loss, or balanced PSA (men) or Pap test (women) message stimulus conditions and followed for 8 weeks. Data were collected through the GfK Custom Research panel. A total of 2401 were eligible, 2321 completed the baseline, and 1730 completed follow up.Mixed effect regression models revealed that higher receptivity to messages was associated with greater intentions to seek cancer information and to speak to a Doctor about PSA and Pap tests. The loss frame was associated with higher intentions to speak to friends and family about PSA and Pap tests. Finally, perceived importance and personal understanding of guidelines predicted intentions to seek more information about them.This study contributes to evidence on how best to inform and engage consumers regarding preventive services.

Do the Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services (GAPS) Facilitate Mental Health Diagnosis?

To determine if the Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services (GAPS) increases detection or shortens time to diagnosis of mental health (MH) disorders, particularly adolescent depression. Starting in May 1999, GAPS questionnaires were routinely administered at adolescent annual visits at 1 primary care clinic in a rural health network. Using an administrative database, we enumerated all MH diagnostic codes for outpatient visits of adolescents aged 13 to 15 years. Population based rates were derived using school enrollment data. Using time series, the rates of MH diagnoses were compared pre- and post-GAPS. Using survival analysis, the time to any MH diagnosis subsequent to index annual visits was also compared pre- and post-GAPS. Because the GAPS questionnaire includes questions for depressed mood, anhedonia, and suicidality, ICD-9-CM codes for depression and mood disorder were also analyzed separately. Time series analysis included 8112 adolescents. The rate of MH diagnosis did not change pre- and post-GAPS (P = .13). Time to any MH diagnosis was similar pre-GAPS (9.0 months) and post-GAPS (7.0 months, log rank P = .30). Time to any first diagnosis of depression or mood disorder was similar post-GAPS (12.2 months) versus pre-GAPS (11.0 months, log rank P = .34). Use of the GAPS was not associated with change in the rate of or time to MH diagnosis. Our results challenge the prevalent expectation that requiring mental health screening will reduce unmet need for MH treatment. Validated MH screening tools, primary care provider training, and access to MH services may also be needed but further study is required.

A Public Health Framework for Developing Local Preventive Services Guidelines

In this article, we describe the San Francisco Department of Public Health's (SFDPH's) framework for developing evidence-based screening and vaccination recommendations. We first reviewed our local data using surveillance and syndemic data. We then compiled and compared existing federal, state, and local recommendations. Then we identified differences as compared with our local evidence; where more evidence was required to make a recommendation, we culled from additional data sources and conducted additional analyses. Lastly, we developed our guidelines by confirming existing recommendations or making new recommendations based on this process. In the end, we successfully developed evidence-based clinical screening and prevention guidelines that have been adopted by the SFDPH Health Commission. We encourage the use of this framework in other public health settings at the local level.

The Case for Creating a Model Insurance Policy: Payer Coverage of Breastfeeding Counseling Services, Pumps, and Supplies

With the implementation of the Health Resources and Services Administration Women's Preventive Services Guidelines, which went into effective August 1, 2012, under the Affordable Care Act, healthcare insurance companies across the country have interpreted the breastfeeding support provision in a variety of ways. In order to improve benefit design and promote transparency and accountability, the National Breastfeeding Center and the United States Breastfeeding Committee co-authored a model insurance policy that seeks to educate insurance executives about appropriately supporting breastfeeding medicine for purposes of improving population health.

Patient-Centered Communication With Adolescents and Young Adults

To evaluate patient-centered communication during adolescent and young adult health-promotion visits with the Event History Calendar (EHC) approach compared to the gold-standard Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services (GAPS) assessment approach.

Public health services provided in the framework of general practitioners' clusters

ARTICLE ARTICLE The public health focused operation of primary health care (PHC) is impeded by its reactive approach and old fashioned treatment-oriented organization in many countries, including Hungary. Our general practitioners’ (GPs’) cluster model, to solve the presently existing organizational problems, builds a new structure described by Adany et al. 1 The lack of adequate education in public health of the current PHC staff2 represents another crucial obstacle of the improvement of PHC performance, which is also handled by the Programme.3 An additional obstacle is that guidelines for PHC preventive services are generally lacking. Although certain countries have developed such kind of guidelines, their proposals are adopted by other countries to a limited extent. The Decree No. 51/1997 of the Minister of Welfare (on the compulsory health insurance-based health services, aimed to prevent and timely detect the diseases and the certification of screenings) defines the preventive tasks of GPs and health visitors. Although, the listed tasks are almost entirely in harmony with the international recommendations, due to the lack of organizational base, financing incentives, relevant training, detailed protocols and auditing, the interventions/screenings prescribed by the decree are hardly implemented. The performance indicators obtained in the preliminary studies in connection with the Swiss Contribution Programme are unacceptably low: 1. Assessment of family history, 36.2% 2. Assessment of dietary habit, 24.7% 3. Screening for alcohol misuse, 16.3% 4. Assessment of smoking …

Rural, Suburban, and Urban Differences in Factors That Impact Physician Adherence to Clinical Preventive Service Guidelines

Rural-urban disparities in provision of preventive services exist, but there is sparse research on how rural, suburban, or urban differences impact physician adherence to clinical preventive service guidelines. We aimed to identify factors that may cause differences in adherence to preventive service guidelines among rural, suburban, and urban primary care physicians. This qualitative study involved in-depth semistructured interviews with 29 purposively sampled primary care physicians (10 rural, 10 suburban, 9 urban) in Missouri. Physicians were asked to describe barriers and facilitators to clinical preventive service guideline adherence. Using techniques from grounded theory analysis, 2 coders first independently conducted content analysis then reconciled differences in coding to ensure agreement on intended meaning of transcripts. Patient epidemiologic differences, distance to health care services, and care coordination were reported as prominent factors that produced differences in preventive service guideline adherence among rural, suburban, and urban physicians. Epidemiologic differences impacted all physicians, but rural physicians highlighted the importance of occupational risk factors in their patients. Greater distance to health care services reduced visit frequency and was a prominent barrier for rural physicians. Care coordination among health care providers was problematic for suburban and urban physicians. Patient resistance to medical care and inadequate access to resources and specialists were identified as barriers by some rural physicians. The rural, suburban, or urban context impacts whether a physician will adhere to clinical preventive service guidelines. Efforts to increase guideline adherence should consider the barriers and facilitators unique to rural, suburban, or urban areas.

A Role for Government: An Observation on Federal Healthcare Efforts in Prevention

A Role for Government: An Observation on Federal Healthcare Efforts in Prevention