Guidelines For Drug Testing Research Articles

Association of Official Racing Chemists guidelines for drug testing in animal hair for doping control.

The Association of Official Racing Chemists (AORC) guidelines for drug testing in animal hair provide animal sport doping control laboratories with a framework for the implementation of a robust and legally defensible program for the analysis, both screening and confirmatory, of animal hair samples. The guidelines were compiled by the AORC Hair Analysis Committee, which is comprised of experts from animal sport doping control laboratories around the world, before being ratified by the AORC membership. They provide guidance on all stages of animal hair analysis, from sample collection, through sample pre-treatment and extraction and onto instrumental analysis.

Urinary Excretion Profile of Cannabinoid Analytes Following Acute Administration of Oral and Vaporized Cannabis in Infrequent Cannabis Users.

Traditionally, smoking has been the predominant method for administering cannabis, but alternative routes of administration have become more prevalent. Additionally, research examining urinary cannabinoid excretion profiles has primarily focused on 11-nor-9-carboxy-∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆9-THC-COOH), a metabolite of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆9-THC), as the primary analyte. The aim of the current study was to characterize the urinary excretion profile of ∆9-THC-COOH, ∆9-THC, ∆8-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆8-THC), 11-hydroxy-∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (11-OH-∆9-THC), ∆9-tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV), 11-nor-∆9-tetrahydrocannabivarin-9-carboxlic acid (THCV-COOH), cannabidiol (CBD), cannabinol (CBN) and 8,11-dihydroxytetrahydrocannabinol (8,11-diOH-∆9-THC) following controlled administration of both oral and vaporized cannabis. Participants (n = 21, 11 men/10 women) who were infrequent cannabis users ingested cannabis-containing brownies (0, 10 and 25 mg ∆9-THC) and inhaled vaporized cannabis (0, 5 and 20 mg ∆9-THC) across six double-blind outpatient sessions. Urinary concentrations of ∆9-THC analytes were measured at baseline and for 8 h after cannabis administration. Sensitivity, specificity and agreement between the three immunoassays (IAs) for ∆9-THC-COOH (cutoffs of 20, 50 and 100 ng/mL) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) analyses (confirmatory cutoff concentrations of 15 ng/mL) were assessed. Urinary concentrations for ∆9-THC-COOH, ∆9-THC, 11-OH-∆9-THC, THCV, CBN and 8,11-diOH-∆9-THC all peaked at 5-6 h and 4 h following oral and vaporized cannabis administration, respectively. At each active dose, median maximum concentrations (Cmax) for detected analytes were quantitatively higher after oral cannabis administration compared to vaporized. Using current recommended federal workplace drug-testing criteria (screening via IA with a cutoff of ≥50 ng/mL and confirmation via LC-MS-MS at a cutoff of ≥15 ng/mL), urine specimens tested positive for ∆9-THC-COOH in 97.6% of oral sessions and 59.5% of vaporized sessions with active ∆9-THC doses. These data indicate that while ∆9-THC-COOH may serve as the most consistent confirmatory analyte under the current drug-testing guidelines, future work examining 11-OH-∆9-THC under similar parameters could yield an alternative analyte that may be helpful in distinguishing between licit and illicit cannabis products.

Urinary Pharmacokinetic Profile of Cannabinoids Following Administration of Vaporized and Oral Cannabidiol and Vaporized CBD-Dominant Cannabis.

Cannabis products in which cannabidiol (CBD) is the primary chemical constituent (CBD-dominant) are increasingly popular and widely available. The impact of CBD exposure on urine drug testing has not been well studied. This study characterized the urinary pharmacokinetic profile of 100-mg oral and vaporized CBD, vaporized CBD-dominant cannabis (100-mg CBD; 3.7-mg ∆9-THC) and placebo in healthy adults (n = 6) using a within-subjects crossover design. Urine specimens were collected before and for 5 days after drug administration. Immunoassay (IA) screening (cutoffs of 20, 50 and 100 ng/mL) and LC-MS-MS confirmatory tests (cutoff of 15 ng/mL) for 11-nor-9-carboxy-∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆9-THCCOOH) were performed; urine was also analyzed for CBD and other cannabinoids. Urinary concentrations of CBD were higher after oral (mean Cmax: 776 ng/mL) versus vaporized CBD (mean Cmax: 261 ng/mL). CBD concentrations peaked 5 h after oral CBD ingestion and within 1 h after inhalation of vaporized CBD. After pure CBD administration, only 1 out of 218 urine specimens screened positive for ∆9-THCCOOH (20-ng/mL IA cutoff) and no specimens exceeded the 15-ng/mL confirmatory cutoff. After inhalation of CBD-dominant cannabis vapor, nine samples screened positive at the 20-ng/mL IA cutoff, and two of those samples screened positive at the 50-ng/mL IA cutoff. Four samples that screened positive (two at 20 ng/mL and two at 50 ng/mL) confirmed positive with concentrations of ∆9-THCCOOH exceeding 15 ng/mL. These data indicate that acute dosing of pure CBD will not result in a positive urine drug test using current federal workplace drug testing guidelines (50-ng/mL IA cutoff with 15-ng/mL confirmatory cutoff). However, CBD products that also contain ∆9-THC may produce positive urine results for ∆9-THCCOOH. Accurate labeling and regulation of ∆9-THC content in CBD/hemp products are needed to prevent unexpected positive drug tests and unintended drug effects.

Urinary 11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol elimination in adolescent and young adult cannabis users during one month of sustained and biochemically-verified abstinence.

Despite adolescents and young adults being the most frequent users of cannabis, all information on cannabis drug testing interpretation is based on data from adults. This study aimed to define the time course of urinary 11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol (THCCOOH) excretion among 70 adolescent and young adult cannabis users during 1 month of biochemically-verified cannabis abstinence. Urine specimens were collected at non-abstinent baseline and after 2, 3, 8, 15, 21 and 28 days of abstinence. Specimens were tested for THCCOOH with a 'rapid' immunoassay drug test and a confirmatory assay using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, with a 5 ng/mL limit of quantitation. Elimination rate was tested using a population pharmacokinetics model. Participants had an average of 26 days of abstinence (SD = 6). Initial creatinine-adjusted THCCOOH concentration (CN-THCCOOH) was 148 ng/mg (SD = 157). Half-life was 2 days (SD = 5), with a 10-day window of detection (estimated range: 4-80 days). At the final timepoint and among those with > 25 days of abstinence (n = 62), 40% (n = 25) had THCCOOH concentrations > 5 ng/mL (i.e. detectable on confirmatory assay) and 19% (n = 12) were 'positive' per federal drug testing guidelines (i.e. values greater than 50 ng/mL on the screening immunoassay and 15 ng/mL on the confirmatory assay). More frequent past month cannabis use was associated with higher baseline CN-THCCOOH concentrations, but not with rate of elimination. Nested five-fold cross-validation suggested high model reliability and predictive validity. Findings underscore that, as with adults, detectable cannabinoid metabolites do not necessarily indicate recent use in adolescents and young adults. Algorithms that account for THCCOOH levels, assessed longitudinally and time between specimen collections are best equipped to confirm abstinence. NCT03276221; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03276221?term=Randi+Schuster&rank=1.

European guidelines for workplace drug and alcohol testing in hair.

Guidelines for Legally Defensible Workplace Drug Testing have been prepared and updated by the European Workplace Drug Testing Society (EWDTS). They are based on the 2010 version published by Pascal Kintz and Ronald Agius (Guidelines for European workplace drug and alcohol testing in hair. Drug Test. Anal. 2010, 2, 367) and in concordance with the Society of Hair Testing guidelines (Society of Hair Testing guidelines for drug testing in hair. Forensic Sci. Int. 2012, 218, 20-24). The European Guidelines are designed to establish best practice procedures whilst allowing individual countries to operate within the requirements of national customs and legislation. The EWDTS recommends that all European laboratories that undertake legally defensible workplace drug testing use these guidelines as a template for accreditation. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Utility of ELISA screening for the monitoring of abstinence from illegal and legal drugs in hair and urine

Amphetamines, cannabinoids, cocaine, opiates, methadone, and benzodiazepines in authentic hair samples with drug concentrations around the medical and psychological assessment (MPA) guidelines cut-offs were screened by LUCIO-direct ELISA kits. Following confirmation of all positive and a significant number of negatively screened samples with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) or liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods accredited for forensic purposes. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were plotted and the area under the curve (AUC) and overall misclassification rate (OMR) were calculated and compared to those obtained for the same drug classes in urine. While fulfilling the validation criteria of the German forensic guidelines, for almost all screening tests in hair and urine the AUC were greater than 0.8, indicating good to excellent performance. Moreover the AUC calculated for the detection of drugs in hair did not differ significantly to the AUC calculated for the detection of the same drug classes in urine, thus showing a comparable screening performance to the well accepted, previously published application of the same ELISAs for the detection of drugs at unconventionally low cut-offs in urine. For the first time, the validation of the immunoassay tests for the complete 6-drug panel MPA profile in hair and urine using a large population of authentic hair and urine samples with drug concentrations around MPA cut-offs, lower than conventional clinical or workplace drug testing guidelines cut-offs as well as those suggested by the Society of hair testing (SoHT) is presented.

Society of Hair Testing guidelines for drug testing in hair

The Society of Hair Testing (SoHT) Guidelines for Drug Testing in Hair provide laboratories with recommended best practice guidelines whether they are currently offering drug testing in hair, or plan to offer a hair testing service in the future. The guidelines include reference to recommended sample collection and storage procedures, through sample preparation, pre-treatment and analysis and the use of cut-offs.

Interpretation of GC–MS opiate results in the presence of pholcodine

Although the cross reactivity of pholcodine with opiate immunoassays has been well documented there is little published information the potential for pholcodine interference with chromatographic analyses. Wilson and Smith [Ann. Clin. Biochem. 36 (1999) 592] recently described the ‘misidentification’ of morphine in quality control specimens that had been spiked with pholcodine. This report describes a sensitive, rapid gas chromatography—mass spectrometry (GC–MS) method for the detection and quantitation of pholcodine and morphine, together with 6-monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM), codeine and dihydrocodeine in urine. This method was used to analyse urine specimens collected from volunteers given single and multiple doses of pholcodine to establish the significance this drug on the analytical results obtained when performing drug screening according to the proposed UK and EU legally defensible workplace drug testing guidelines. The maximum urinary free morphine concentration achieved following a single 10mg oral dose of pholcodine was 1.39mg/l at 2–4h post dose. Following multiple 10mg oral doses of pholcodine the maximum urinary free morphine concentration was determined as 0.4mg/l at 170h after the final dose was administered. This apparent anomaly in the morphine concentrations obtained following single and multiple pholcodine doses can be explained in part by differences in the concentration of the specimens, and may be overcome by applying a correction factor for specimen dilution using their creatinine concentration. The data from this study suggests that even following one single 10mg dose of pholcodine, free morphine concentrations greater than both the proposed UK workplace drug testing guidelines threshold of 0.3mg/l total morphine and the proposed European Union threshold of 0.2mg/l total morphine can be achieved. This highlights the need for caution when interpreting confirmatory opiate data, especially in medicolegal and clinical cases, and in cases where the use of pholcodine is suspected.

Survey on drugs-of-abuse testing in the European Union.

A survey on the quality of drugs-of-abuse testing in European laboratories was performed in 1993 (Part I) and 1994 (Part II). A total of 195 laboratories participated in Part I and 228 in Part II. There were 154 repeater laboratories. In each part of the survey, six urine samples were sent for analysis under routine conditions. A set of reference materials, including deuterated drug-standard solutions, was provided in Part II of the survey for optimization of analytical procedures. Screening for groups of substances was mainly performed by immunological techniques. Rates of false-positive (FP) results were 0 and 0.5%, respectively, in Parts I and II, and rates of false-negative (FN) results were 7.7% in Part I and 3.4% in Part II. Identification and quantitation of specific substances was mainly carried out by chromatographic methods, particularly gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Application of chromatographic methods showed a lack of sensitivity (14.9% and 16.7% FN in Parts I and II, respectively) and a lack of specificity (0.8% FP in Part I versus 1.1% in Part II). Repeater laboratories improved their results (17.4% FN in Part I versus 14.2% Part II). The improvement of repeater laboratories emphasizes the need of external quality control programs. The experience is being used as a basis for a recommendation on drug-testing guidelines by a group of European toxicologists.

Drug analysis for control purposes in forensic toxicology, workplace testing, sports medicine and related areas.

This MiniReview describes the present guidelines for drug testing in forensic toxicology, workplace testing and doping control of athletes. Such guidelines are established to secure the chain of custody, from sample collection through analysis with screening, confirmation methods and interpretation, to the final report of results. Specifications for good laboratory practice, facility maintenance and quality assurance programs are described. The advantages and limitation of immunological drug assays and the necessity of specific chromatographic confirmation methods are discussed. The importance of correct interpretation of positive test results is illustrated. The effect of drug testing on the prevalence of drug abuse, accident rates and effectivity at the workplace is discussed.

The Medical Review Officer's Guide to Drug Testing

Over the last decade, workplace drug testing has become increasingly common in the United States. In 1980, only the military and the nuclear industry tested routinely. Today, most large corporations require preemployment drug screens. Federal drug testing requirements apply to some 7 million Americans. While the manufacture of equipment and chemicals used in drug testing cost $300 million in 1990, more recent estimates suggest that drug testing is now a billion-dollar-a-year industry. The rapid growth of drug testing has given rise to a new role for physicians: medical review officer (MRO). First defined in the 1988 guidelines for drug testing in the federal workplace, an MRO is a physician who reviews the results of drug tests. The MRO offers the employee the chance to provide an explanation for a positive result, such as a prescription for a controlled substance. In addition, MROs have come to serve an important quality control

From the FDA: New drug testing guidelines include women

From the FDA: New drug testing guidelines include women

Considerations Regarding the Development of Individual Non-clinical Test Strategies in the European Community

The wish of pharmaceutical companies to be given the most binding possible preclinical test programmes for a new product, and the tendency of authorities to regulate to a great extent the preclinical testing of new drugs (especially at a multinational level), has led to differing requirements and practices in preclinical testing in different areas of the world. These differing requirements and practices have of necessity brought in their wake varying scientific criteria, with particular regard to animal protection, ethical standards, as well as imposing apparently unjustified extra financial costs. In order to improve this situation, the development of drug-specific preclinical test strategies is proposed in a drafted E. C. Note for Guidance, which incorporates already existing drug-testing guidelines and method recommendations. This draft Note for Guidance points to general methods of analysing problems and reaching decisions and thus appears to be worthy of recommendation as practical and desirable. It requires the co-operation of drug producers and supervisory authorities at a high scientific and ethical level. With regard to the state-of-the art and the socio-political background, the fulfillment of these requirements would appear not only to be appropriate but also imperative. To put them into practice would contribute enormously to the improvement of drug development and to de-emotionalization of the public debate. Therefore, comments on these draft guidelines from societies and associations are urgently sought and awaited with keen interest.

Consensus Conference Releases Drug Testing Guidelines

Consensus Conference Releases Drug Testing Guidelines

Guidelines for Drug Abuse Testing Labs

Guidelines to help organizations choose and monitor a drug testing laboratory have been adopted by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry (AACC). The group's goal is to help employers establish accurate and reliable programs for detecting drug abuse. The National Institute on Drug Abuse also has written guidelines for drug testing. Those guidelines—prepared in response to President Reagan's executive order issued last fall that all federal employees in sensitive jobs be screened for drug abuse—will apply only to federal employees. The federal guidelines are being reviewed within the Department of Health & Human Services and, once approved, will be published in the Federal Register. The potential for error and fraud in testing employees for illicit drug use was underscored recently by the conviction of a scientist who was found to have falsified test results (C&EN, June 29, page 19). AACC thinks such situations can be avoided if the testing laboratory is carefully selected and ...

Industry Perspective on Geriatric Drug Testing

Pharmaceutical manufacturers maintain a continued interest in proposals for geriatric drug testing. An industry poll indicates varying levels of activity in clinical testing in geriatric patients and varying types of study designs. Manufacturers appear to be almost uniform in supporting the need for some form of geriatric drug testing. Reviews of the proposals for drug testing guidelines developed by the Food and Drug Administration and American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapy are discussed.