Guidelines For Adjuvant Chemotherapy Research Articles

Benefits of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Clinical T3-4N0 Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy.

While the guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for colon cancer are relatively standardized, those for early rectal cancer are still lacking. We therefore evaluated the role of AC in clinical stage II rectal cancer treatment after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Patients diagnosed with early rectal cancer (defined by clinical stage T3/4, N0) who completed CRT followed by surgery were enrolled in this retrospective study. To evaluate the role of AC, we analyzed the risk of recurrence and survival based on clinicopathologic parameters and adjuvant chemotherapy. Of the 112 patients, 11 patients (9.8%) experienced recurrence and five patients (4.8%) died. In a multivariate analysis, circumferential resection margin involvement (CRM+) on magnetic resonance imaging at diagnosis, CRM involvement following neoadjuvant therapy (ypCRM+), tumor regression grade (≤G1) and no-AC were considered poor prognostic factors for recurrence free survival (RFS). In addition, ypCRM+ and no-AC were associated with poor overall survival (OS) in the multivariate analysis. AC including 5-FU monotherapy demonstrated the benefits of reduced recurrence and prolonged survival in clinical stage II rectal cancer, even in pathologic stage following neoadjuvant therapy (ypStage) 0-I. Further prospective studies are needed to verify the benefit of each regimen of AC and the development of a method that can accurately predict CRM status before surgery, and a vigorous treatment that can induce CRM non-involvement (CRM-) should be considered even in early stages of rectal cancer.

Effectiveness of chemotherapy on prognosis of elderly breast cancer: A retrospective cohort study based on SEER database.

e12525 Background: The estimated population of breast cancer older than 70 years is over 80,000 new onset cases in 2019 and keep increasing. Currently, the proportion of standard chemotherapy for elderly patients was much lower than that for young patients, due to shorter life expectancy, more comorbidities, and concerns over increased toxicities and reduced tolerance. Till now, few evidences from clinical trials could support the use of chemotherapy for elderly patients, as also indicated by current guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy. The effectiveness of chemotherapy for elderly breast cancer remains to be further verified. Methods: We identified 75,525 female breast cancer patients aged 70 years and older in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2016, and excluded those patients with secondary, metastatic, or bilateral breast cancer, not confirmed by pathology, lacking of key information, dead or loss to follow-up in 6 months after diagnosis. Propensity score matching (PSM) (PSM ratio: 1:1, caliper: 0.2* standard deviation of propensity score) was applied to construct balanced cohorts with or without chemotherapy based on demographic and pathophysiological characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analysis, multivariable Cox proportional model, and subgroup analysis were performed to evaluate the effectiveness of chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Results: A total of 33,177 eligible patients were included, of them, 5273 (15.89%) received chemotherapy. Through PSM, 8360 patients were successfully matched and almost reached balances between groups. In matched dataset, patients receiving chemotherapy exhibited a better prognosis on OS and BCSS (the 5-year survival rate, OS: 0.80 [0.78-0.82] with chemotherapy vs. 0.71[0.69-0.73] control; BCSS: 0.88 [0.87-0.89] with chemotherapy vs. 0.85 [0.84-0.86]; both log-rank test, P < 0.001); in multivariable Cox analysis, chemotherapy was associated with a 35% and 21% risk reduction on OS (HR [95%CI]: 0.65[0.59-0.72]) and BCSS (0.79[0.69-0.91]), respectively. Furthermore, subgroups with HER-2 positive, or more lymph nodes involved, were inclined to benefit more from chemotherapy. Conclusions: Our study provided additional evidences that chemotherapy may improve the prognosis of elderly breast cancer, especially for those subpopulations benefit more from chemotherapy treatment.

Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in Uruguay: A population-based study.

53 Background: Despite surgery, the 5-year risk of systemic recurrence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the absence of any further therapy is approximately 50 % for those with lymph node involvement and 20 ─ 30 % if the lymph nodes are negative. Adjuvant chemotherapy contributes to improved disease-free and overall survival for node-positive (stage III) or high-risk node negative (stage IIB) colon cancer. Similar benefits are observed for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. Previous research shows varied rates of adherence to published adjuvant chemotherapy Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) for CRC, although population-based data is scarce. Purpose: The aim of this analysis was to assess adherence rates to adjuvant chemotherapy prescription within 16 weeks of surgery according to local and international CPGs for CRC patients treated with curative intent between 2008 and 2019 at the Uruguayan National Cancer Institute. Data regarding factors associated with chemotherapy receipt beyond 16 weeks from surgery and chemotherapy non receipt was also retrieved and analysed. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical and pathology reports of 833 patients diagnosed with CRC at our institution. Patients with stages IIB or III CRC who underwent curative-intent surgery were identified and included in the present analysis. A 16-week benchmark timeline for treatment initiation from date of surgery was considered. Fisher’s exact test was used to determine factors independently associated with receipt of chemotherapy and meeting the 16-week benchmark (p 0.05). Results: A total of 400 patients were identified of which 72% had peritoneal colorectal tumors and 28% had sub-peritoneal rectal tumors. Approximately 70% of the latter group received neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. Considering the total cohort, 61% received adjuvant chemotherapy. Factors predicting chemotherapy receipt in the peritoneal colorectal group were age ≤ 70 and stage III disease. In the sub-peritoneal rectal group no significant effect was found. The 16-week benchmark was met in 72% (175) of those receiving chemotherapy and 70.6% (167) completed 6 months of systemic adjuvant treatment. A total of 156 patients (39%) did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. The factors predicting chemotherapy non receipt were age > 70 and stage IIB in the peritoneal colorectal group. Conclusions: This analysis of adherence to CPGs identified several factors associated with chemotherapy non receipt and chemotherapy receipt outside of timeline benchmarks from date of curative-intent surgery in Montevideo, Uruguay. The two main factors significantly associated with chemotherapy non receipt were advanced age and lower disease stage. To our knowledge, our data is the first to elucidate these specific factors in the Uruguayan CRC patient population.

Italian survey on the clinical management of non-small cell lung cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A lesson for the second wave.

This study investigated the clinical management of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients during the first wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in Italy. A 29-questions survey was sent to 95 Italian thoracic oncologists, with 77 % of them declaring significant changes in the outpatients management and treatment. The results of this survey pointed out a significant delay of lung cancer diagnosis along with a relevant reduction of patients' accrual within clinical trials. Telemedicine emerged as a valid support for patient-healthcare interactions. Therapeutic indications followed the guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemo-radiation. Clinical indications to first-line therapies were largely confirmed, while major changes regarded the selection of second line treatment options as well as the management of elderly population. This work may represent a valid source of information to improve the clinical management of NSCLC patients during second wave of COVID-19 pandemic.

Predictors of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer patients with an intermediate Oncotype-DX score: A SEER-based population study.

e12014 Background: Oncotype-DX Assay is a 21-gene based recurrence score (RS) that helps stratify breast cancer patients based on their risk of recurrence. It is often used to help identify patients that may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). Prior to the TAILORx Trial results, there were no guidelines for AC in patients with an intermediate score (18-30). Management of these patients was often at the clinical judgement of the provider. We sought to determine predictors of AC among these patients, and measure treatment effect on survival. Methods: We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results database for breast cancer patients newly diagnosed between 2010-2015. We included patients with T1-T3, hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative, and lymph node-negative breast cancer with an intermediate RS. Male patients, those younger than 40 years, tumors 5 mm or less, and incomplete records were excluded. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to derive independent predictors of AC. Cox Proportional-Hazards Model was done to examine the effect of AC on survival. Results: We included 14,710 patients of whom 4,508 (30.6%) received AC. Patients that received AC were younger (55.4 years [8.8] vs 60.0 [9.7], p < 0.001), grade III or higher (29.8% vs 16.4%, p < 0.001), and had a higher RS (23.9 [3.6] vs 21.5 [3.1], p < 0.001). Higher T stage was associated with a higher rate of patients receiving AC (p < 0.001). Marital status was also associated with AC; a higher proportion of patients who received AC were married (67.9% vs 64.4%, p < 0.001). There was no significant association between race/ethnicity or insurance type with AC. Multivariate analysis showed that RS (OR: 1.24 [1.23-1.26], p < 0.001), T stage (OR: 1.67 [1.21-2.30], p < 0.001), and a grade III tumor (OR: 1.85 [1.64-2.09], p < 0.001) were the strongest predictors of AC. The age decile 80-89 years (OR: 0.05 [0.02-0.10], p < 0.001) was the most negative predictor of AC. AC did not have an effect on 5 year overall survival (97.6% vs 96.0%, p = 0.28). Conclusions: Between 2010-2015, our study shows 30.6% of breast cancers patients with an intermediate Oncotype-DX score were given AC. The decision to treat was largely based on tumor size, grade and age. AC had no effect on overall survival.

Association of adjuvant chemotherapy with overall survival in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma previously treated with neoadjuvant therapy.

404 Background: Guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy are equivocal. A lymph node ratio (LNR) ≥ 0.15 may predict lack of benefit, but conflicting results are reported. Methods: The National Cancer Database was searched to identify patients who were resected after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 2006-2013. Exclusions: metastases at surgery, 90-day postoperative mortality, adjuvant radiation, and outlier interval from diagnosis to surgery (<2.5 or >10 months). The association between adjuvant chemotherapy and overall survival (OS) from diagnosis was examined using multivariable Cox regression and inverse propensity of treatment weighted (IPTW) Cox regression. An IPTW based estimator of the average treatment effect (ATE) was used to quantify the population average survival benefit of treatment. Outcomes were examined in all patients and in those with LNR < 0.15 and ≥ 0.15. Results: 681/2488 patients (27%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. In multivariable Cox regression, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in the overall cohort and in patients with LNR < 0.15. A trend towards improved OS was also observed for those with LNR ≥ 0.15. After accounting for indication bias using IPTW, a significant survival benefit for was observed only for patients with LNR < 0.15. The ATE among LNR < 0.15 patients was 3.3 (95% CI 1.0, 5.7) months, indicating that the average survival of the population would be 3.3 months longer if all received treatment. Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy in resected PDAC patients who received neoadjuvant therapy appears to be beneficial in patients with negative lymph nodes or minimal nodal burden. High LNR after neoadjuvant therapy may be an indicator of adverse tumor biology that is less likely to derive a therapeutic benefit. [Table: see text]

Comorbidity-dependent adherence to guidelines and survival in breast cancer-Is there a role for guideline adherence in comorbid breast cancer patients? A retrospective cohort study with 2137 patients.

In the treatment of breast cancer, decisions on adjuvant treatment reflect individual patient characteristics like age and comorbidity. This study assessed the association between adherence to guidelines for adjuvant treatment and survival while taking into account age at diagnosis and comorbidities. We collected the Charlson comorbidity index at baseline for 2179 women treated for primary breast cancer from 1992 to 2008 who participated in a German retrospective multicenter cohort study. We assessed subsequent adjuvant therapy guideline adherence and survival in relation to baseline comorbidities. Guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were more often violated in patients with higher Charlson score. Patients with higher Charlson scores received chemotherapy and radiotherapy less often and had higher rates of mastectomy. Irrespective of comorbidity (Charlson score 0, 1-2, ≥3), patients with 100% guideline-adherent adjuvant treatment showed better overall and disease-free survival (DFS) compared to patients with guideline violations (GVs). Controlling for age, comorbidity and tumor characteristics, the hazard ratio for at least one GV was 1.65 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.33-2.07) for overall survival and 1.84 (95% CI: 1.53-2.22) for DFS. Guideline-adherent treatment was significantly less frequent in comorbid patients, although guideline adherence was strongly associated with improved survival, irrespective of severity, and number of comorbid diseases.

Singapore Cancer Network (SCAN) Guidelines for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The SCAN lung cancer workgroup aimed to develop Singapore Cancer Network (SCAN) clinical practice guidelines for the use of adjuvant systemic therapy for non-small cell lung cancer in Singapore. The workgroup utilised a modified ADAPTE process to calibrate high quality international evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to our local setting. Five international guidelines were evaluated- those developed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2014), European Society of Medical Oncology (2014), National Institute of Clinical Excellence (2012), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (2014), and the Cancer Care Council Australia (2012). Recommendations on the selection of patients, chemotherapy regimen, treatment for stage I disease, treatment for positive margins and treatment options for pN2 disease with negative margins were produced. These adapted guidelines form the SCAN Guidelines 2015 for adjuvant systemic therapy of non-small cell lung cancer.

Impact of guideline adherence on patient outcomes in early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer

AimThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines on survival outcomes in patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. MethodsOur institutional cancer registry data on 266 patients with Stage I epithelial ovarian cancer was reviewed retrospectively and compliance with treatment guidelines for surgery and adjuvant treatment was determined. Patients were categorized according to adherence or non-adherence. The primary endpoints were recurrence-free survival and disease-specific survival. Hazard ratios (HRs) for survival were estimated with a Cox proportional hazards model. ResultsOf the 266 patients, 71 (26.7%) underwent adequate surgical staging in accordance with the guidelines. The guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy were followed adequately in all 71 patients that were adherent to surgical staging and in 163 of the 195 patients with non-adherence to surgical staging (83.6%). Multivariate analysis, adjusted for prognostic factors, identified higher recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15–0.88) and disease-specific survival (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.16–1.12) among patients whose treatment adhered to both surgical and chemotherapy guidelines, although disease-specific survival was not statistically significant. When excluding clear cell histology from the cohort, the guideline-adherent group had significantly better disease-specific survival than the non-adherent group (HR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02–0.94). ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that adherence to NCCN guidelines may improve survival outcomes in patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer, particularly in cases other than clear cell histology.

21-gene Recurrence Score testing and subsequent treatment decisions in patients (pts) with estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+) early-stage breast cancer (ESBC).

30 Background: The utilization of the 21-gene Recurrence Score (Oncotype DX) in community settings is now well established for ER+, node negative (N-) pts with ESBC. The utility of the Recurrence Score result is to guide treatment decisions and spare exposure to chemotherapy (CT) in pts that have little likelihood of benefitting. To better understand physician behavior as it relates to OncotypeDX testing, we examined the characteristics of pts tested versus not tested, the Recurrence Score distribution and treatment patterns in approximately 160 pts with ESBC seen in 2010. In addition, provider utilization and treatment patterns were also assessed. Methods: Using data from 2010, the number of pts who were eligible to undergo OncotypeDX testing was compared to the number of pts who underwent testing. Pts were considered eligible for testing if they had node-negative, ER+, HER2-negative ESBC. We determined the number of pts with a Recurrence Score value in the low (RS <18), intermediate (int; RS 18-30), and high-risk (RS ≥31) groups along with the number of pts who subsequently received chemotherapy in each category. Results: Of the 233 pts identified with ESBC, 158 were eligible for OncotypeDX testing and 107 (67.7%) underwent testing. Fifty-five percent of pts were low, 37% int, and 7.7% high-risk, respectively. Nineteen percent of low, 56% of int, and 100% of high-risk pts received CT. In the 11 pts with a low Recurrence Score result that received CT, the reason cited was pt decision in 4 and young age in 3. Conclusions: Oncotype DX use in the community is well established. Recurrence Score-guided use of CT in the low- and int-risk groups was as expected based on adjuvant chemotherapy guidelines; however, there were still some physicians treating low Recurrence Score pts with CT-mostly based on younger age or larger tumors. Data from 2011 and 2012 will be included in the final presentation allowing greater insight into pt groups less represented in the single year experience.

Relationship between Oncotype DX testing and the use of chemotherapy in high-risk patients (pts).

6098 Background: CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield (CFBCBS) insurance network partnered with Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions (CHSS) to develop a cancer care pathway for network physicians in 2008. The program included a recommendation for molecular diagnostic testing with the Oncotype DX assay for pts with early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Based on NCCN guidelines, the pathway suggested adjuvant chemotherapy for all pts with Oncotype DX Recurrence Scores (RS) in the high-risk category. We aimed to determine the RS risk distribution among pts who received Oncotype DX testing and assess the patterns of care that followed. Methods: Using data from CFBCBS, CHSS proprietary claims software, and Genomic Health, we retrospectively identified a cohort of women with breast cancer who were treated on the CFBCBS clinical care pathways program from 8/2008 to 6/2011 and received Oncotype DX testing. We determined the number of pts with a RS value in the low- (RS <18), intermediate- (RS 18-30), and high-risk (RS ≥31) groups along with the number of pts who subsequently received chemotherapy in each category. Results: Of 1174 women who received Oncotype DX testing, 53% of pts were in the low-, 35% in intermediate-, and 12% in the high-risk groups. Five percent of low-, 41% of intermediate-, and 74% percent of pts in the high-risk category were treated with chemotherapy. Twenty-six percent of pts in the high-risk group did not receive chemotherapy. Conclusions: The proportionate use of chemotherapy in the low and intermediate risk groups was as expected based on adjuvant chemotherapy guidelines; however, the underuse of chemotherapy in 26% of high-risk pts was an unexpected finding. Further study is needed to determine: (1) why physicians avoided chemotherapy in 26% of high-risk pts; (2) the overall number of appropriate pts who underwent Oncotype DX testing; and, (3) the tumor characteristics that may have driven the underutilization of chemotherapy in the high-risk population.

Evaluation of Oncotype DX testing and subsequent patterns of care in patients (pts) with early-stage breast cancer (ESBC).

569 Background: Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions (CHSS) partners with payers to manage clinical care pathways in oncology and rheumatology. Observations from one such pathway with CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield revealed that pts with estrogen receptor-positive ESBC who underwent Oncotype DX testing and were found to have high-risk Recurrence Scores (RS) received less chemotherapy than expected. To better understand physician behavior as it relates to Oncotype DX testing, CHSS examined patterns of Oncotype DX use in a large private practice oncology group with a robust electronic medical record (EMR), Georgia Cancer Specialists (GCS). We aimed to determine the RS risk distribution among pts who received Oncotype DX testing and assess the patterns of care that followed. Methods: Using GCS EMR data from 2009 to 2011, the number of pts who were eligible to undergo Oncotype DX testing was compared to the number of pts who underwent testing. Pts were considered eligible for testing if they had node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative ESBC. We determined the number of pts with a RS value in the low- (RS <18), intermediate- (RS 18-30), and high-risk (RS ≥31) groups along with the number of pts who subsequently received chemotherapy in each category. Results: Of the 1908 patients identified with ESBC, 788 were eligible for Oncotype DX testing and 288 (37%) underwent testing. Fifty percent of pts were in the low-, 34% in intermediate-, and 16% in the high-risk groups. Six percent of low-, 41% of intermediate-, and 83% of high-risk pts received chemotherapy. Seventeen percent of pts in the high-risk group did not receive chemotherapy. Conclusions: The use of chemotherapy in the low- and intermediate-risk groups was as expected based on adjuvant chemotherapy guidelines; however, an under utilization of chemotherapy was found in high-risk pts. There also appears to be a noteworthy underuse of Oncotype DX testing in eligible pts. Further data analysis is needed to understand the low use of Oncotype DX testing in eligible pts and to explain the lower than expected use of chemotherapy in high-risk pts.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer: Guideline implementation, patterns of use and outcomes in daily practice in The Netherlands

Background. Little is known about how well guidelines about adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer are followed in daily practice. We evaluated the current guideline, which is based on the MOSAIC trial, by examining implementation, treatment patterns and disease-free survival. Material and methods. We analysed a population-based cohort of 391 patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer in 2005–2006. Data were gathered from the Dutch Cancer Registry and medical records of 19 hospitals. Patients were classified according to whether or not they fulfilled MOSAIC trial eligibility criteria. Results. The administered regimens were: fluorouracil-leucovorin (17 patients), capecitabine (93), fluorouracil-leucovorin plus oxaliplatin (145), and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (136). After its inclusion in national guidelines, oxaliplatin was prescribed in 16 hospitals within six months. Patients receiving oxaliplatin were younger and had less comorbidity than other patients. Dose schedules corresponded well with guidelines. Two-year disease-free survival probability of oxaliplatin patients meeting MOSAIC eligibility criteria was 78.4% (95% CI 72.5–84.3), which was comparable to MOSAIC trial results. Conclusion. Guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer are generally well followed in daily practice. However, uncertainty remains regarding the optimal treatment of elderly patients and patients with comorbidities, which underscores the need for practical clinical trials including these patients.

A critical appraisal of the adjuvant chemotherapy guidelines for patients with completely resected T3N0 non-small-cell lung cancer

Background. A Joint Expert Panel recently published guidelines for adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy, recommending routine use in patients with completely resected stage II (T1-2N1 and T3N0) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, these two tumor subgroups should be considered as different entities. While the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy has been established in patients with T1-2N1 NSCLC, its benefit in patients with T3N0 tumor remains questionable. Material and methods. We performed an extensive review of the literature using the Joint Expert Panel guidelines as a start point. Altogether, we identified 76 potentially relevant articles. Basing on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 23 of the 76 articles were eventually included in this review. Results. After careful evaluation of the selected articles, we found no information on the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T3N0 NSCLC. Discussion. In the absence of evidence-based data, we recommend that the lack of information on the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for T3N0 tumors be discussed with patients and propose chemotherapy as an individual option. While the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy will be difficult to assess prospectively through a large randomized clinical trial, a pooled-analysis of the existing data would quickly and with a limited effort provide a preliminary answer.

Predictors of adjuvant chemotherapy (AT) decision-making in referred patients (pts) with stage II and III colon cancer (CC)

e15070 Background: Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated a robust survival benefit of AT for node positive (stage III) CC patients; similar evidence for node-negative (stage II) patients is lacking. While guidelines recommend AT for stage III colon cancer but AT is not a routine recommendation for stage II. Actual practice of the evidence varies and suggests the interplay of additional variables. We sought to identify factors associated with practice patterns which vary from conventional AT guidelines, ie no AT in stage III CC and receipt of AT in.stage II CC. Methods: Data pertaining to pt demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment for pts with resected stage II (n=176) and III CC (n=235) referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency in 2004 was collected by retrospective chart review. One-sided Fisher's exact test was used to assess statistical significance (p<0.05) by univariate analysis. Results: 28% (n=49) of stage II pts received AT. Compared to untreated pts, stage II pts who received AT were significantly more often younger than 66 years (57% vs 21%), lived in a city with a regional cancer center (71% vs 51%), had T4 disease (33% vs 9%), vascular invasion (22% vs 5%), perineural invasion (10% vs 2%) and high grade (26% vs 2%). Marital status, ethnicity, lymphatic invasion and high CEA were not associated with AT in stage II. 29% (n=69) of stage III pts did not receive AT. Compared to treated pts, stage III pts who did not receive AT were significantly more often older than 65 years (91% vs 51%), had low grade disease (96% vs 84%) and presented for oncology consultation greater than 42 days from surgery (29% vs 11%). Marital status, ethnicity, residence, T4 status or N2 status were not associated with no AT in stage III. Conclusions: For pts with stage II CC, subgroups associated with high risk for relapse were more likely to receive AT although the majority of stage II pts in this cohort remained untreated. For stage III disease, almost one-third of referred pts did not receive AT. Older age and delayed presentation were strongly associated with failure to receive AT. Within the limitations of a retrospective review, these data highlight the significant and commonly observed implications of factors other than stage in AT decision-making for high risk resected CC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.