Guideline-adherent Treatment Research Articles

Potential of a Telemedical, Inpatient-Outpatient Care Concept to Improve the Quality of Healthcare from the User's Perspective - An Acceptance Analysis of the TELnet@NRW Study

The aim of this study was to measure the acceptance of a telemedical, inpatient-outpatient care concept by physicians, patients and the relatives of patients. Based on a quantitative survey of acceptance, both the potential and success factors influencing the use of telemedicine were to be highlighted. The TELnet@NRW study is a national, multicenter, cluster-randomized study in stepped-wedge design conducted from February 2017 to January 2020 for the purpose of documenting changes in the quality of care through telemedicine in an inpatient-outpatient network. Consultations were focused on intensive care medicine and infectious diseases. This current study used questionnaires for specific groups of patients to determine acceptance of the telemedical care concept practiced in the main study. The survey was anonymously conducted once in either digital or paper-based form during the reporting period. The answers of 126 questionnaires from physicians and 1686 questionnaires from patients and their relatives were evaluated. The physicians of both sectors attributed high potential (up to 88.4%) for telemedicine to improve guideline-adherent treatment. A trustworthy and appreciative communication during the telemedical consultation represented a positively reinforcing success factor. The additional workload generated by telemedicine inhibited acceptance, especially in the inpatient sector. A continuation of telemedicine beyond the end of the project was supported by the majority of surveyed physicians (inpatient 60.6%, outpatient 82.1%) as well as in patients and their relatives (inpatient 79.7%, outpatient 57.4%) in both sectors. There is widespread acceptance of telemedical, inpatient-outpatient care concepts among physicians, patients and their relatives. Low-effort processes and user-centered technology are crucial to increase the rate of use. Telemedicine has the potential to improve the quality of care and can serve as a robust component of sustainable healthcare in Germany.

Identifying Opportunities to Deliver High-Quality Cancer Care Across a Health System: A Clinical Responsibility.

We examined process-related quality metrics for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) depending on treating facility type across a health system and region. Retrospective in accordance with Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Single health system and region. Patients with OSCC diagnosed between 2012 and 2018 were identified from tumor registries of 6hospitals (1 academic and 5 community) within a single health system. Patients were categorized into 3care groups: (1) solely at the academic center, (2) solely at community facilities, and (3) combined care at academic and community facilities. Primary outcome measures were process-related quality metrics: positive surgical margin rate, lymph node yield (LNY), adjuvant treatment initiation≤6 weeks, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-guideline adherence. A total of 499 patients were included: 307 (61.5%) patients in the academic-only group, 101 (20.2%) in the community-only group, and 91 (18.2%) in the combined group. Surgery at community hospitals was associated with increased odds of positive surgical margins (11.9% vs2.5%, odds ratio [OR]: 47.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.2-275.86, P < .001) and lower odds of LNY ≥ 18 (52.8% vs85.9%, OR: 0.15, 95%CI: 0.07-0.33, P < .001) relative to the academic center. Compared with the academic-only group, odds of adjuvant treatment initiation ≤6 weeks were lower for the combined group (OR: 0.30, 95%CI: 0.13-0.64, P = .002) and odds of NCCN guideline-adherent treatment were lower in the community only group (OR: 0.35, 95%CI: 0.18-0.70, P = .003). Quality of oral cancer care across the health system and region is comparable to or better-than national standards, indicating good baseline quality of care. Differences by facility type and fragmentation of care present an opportunity for bringing best in-class cancer care across an entire region.

The real-world selection of first-line systemic therapy regimen for metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm in Japan

In November 2013, the first edition of evidence-based guidelines for treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (GEP-NEN) was published in Japan. However, whether medical practitioners have adopted the first-line regimens recommended for metastatic GEP-NEN in clinical practice is not yet known. The purpose of this study was to identify which first-line systemic therapy regimens have been selected and the proportion of cases that are adherent to the guidelines (i.e., number of patients receiving recommended therapy/total number of patients). We combined hospital-based cancer registry data and insurance claims-equivalent data for patients with GEP-NEN treated between January 2013 and December 2014 and extracted those with metastatic GEP-NEN who received systemic therapy. The proportions that were adherent with the guideline were calculated according to tumor classification (neuroendocrine tumor [NET] or neuroendocrine carcinoma [NEC]), primary site (gastrointestinal or pancreatic), and hospital volume (high, medium, or low). The study included 109 patients with GEP-NET and 424 with GEP-NEC. Overall, guideline-adherent treatment was provided in only 54.8% of cases (58.1% for gastrointestinal NET, 63.6% for pancreatic NET, 56.6% for gastrointestinal NEC, and 44.9% for pancreatic NEC). The recommended therapy for GEP-NET was used in 16.5% of patients with GEP-NEC, and 21.5% received fluoropyrimidine-containing chemotherapy. This report is the first to describe real-world selection of first-line regimens for metastatic GEP-NEN. About half of all these patients received systemic therapy that was not recommended in the guidelines.

EP04.01-012 Sex and Age-Related Guideline-Adherence Disparities in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treatment Patterns: Real-World Data

Age-related disparities in lung cancer treatment have been observed with elderly patients being less likely to receive guideline-adherent treatment despite reported benefit. However, studies on the effect of sex in treatment disparity are few. Therefore, we aimed to address this knowledge gap by examining sex and age-related treatment patterns in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

An assessment of left-digit bias in the treatment of older patients with potentially curable rectal cancer

BackgroundPatient age is associated with poorer rectal cancer treatment compliance. However, it is unknown whether left-digit bias (disproportionate influence of leftmost age digit) influences this association. MethodsThe patients diagnosed with stage I–III rectal cancer between 2006 to 2017 in the National Cancer Database were identified. The association between age and receipt of guideline-adherent care was assessed using mixed-effects multivariable analyses. ResultsAmong 97,960 patients, 46.2% received guideline-adherent overall treatment and 73.3% underwent guideline-adherent surgical resection. Of those who underwent guideline-adherent surgery, 86.4% received guideline-adherent radiotherapy and 56.6% received guideline-adherent chemotherapy. After risk-adjustment, each decade increase in age was associated with 36% decreased odds of guideline-adherent therapy (odds ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval = 0.63–0.65). Patients aged 58 to 59 (odds ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval = 1.02–1.27) and 78 to 79 (odds ratio = 1.28, 95% confidence interval = 1.08–1.51) had higher odds of guideline-adherent overall treatment compared with patients aged 60 and 80, respectively. However, there were no significant differences in the receipt of guideline-adherent treatment between patients aged 60 vs 61–62 and 80 vs 81–82. ConclusionOlder patients with rectal cancer are less likely to receive guideline-adherent care, and a left-digit bias is present. Geriatric assessment-guided treatment decisions could help mitigate this bias.

Racial disparities in epithelial ovarian cancer survival: An examination of contributing factors in the Ovarian Cancer in Women of African Ancestry consortium.

Black women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer have poorer survival compared to white women. Factors that contribute to this disparity, aside from socioeconomic status and guideline-adherent treatment, have not yet been clearly identified. We examined data from the Ovarian Cancer in Women of African Ancestry (OCWAA) consortium which harmonized data on 1074 Black women and 3263 white women with ovarian cancer from seven US studies. We selected potential mediators and confounders by examining associations between each variable with race and survival. We then conducted a sequential mediation analysis using an imputation method to estimate total, direct, and indirect effects of race on ovarian cancer survival. Black women had worse survival than white women (HR=1.30; 95% CI1.16-1.47) during study follow-up; 67.9% of Black women and 69.8% of white women died. In our final model, mediators of this disparity include college education, nulliparity, smoking status, body mass index, diabetes, diabetes/race interaction, postmenopausal hormone (PMH) therapy duration, PMH duration/race interaction, PMH duration/age interaction, histotype, and stage. These mediators explained 48.8% (SE=12.1%) of the overall disparity; histotype/stage and PMH duration accounted for the largest fraction. In summary, nearly half of the disparity in ovarian cancer survival between Black and white women in the OCWAA consortium is explained by education, lifestyle factors, diabetes, PMH use, and tumor characteristics. Our findings suggest that several potentially modifiable factors play a role. Further research to uncover additional mediators, incorporate data on social determinants of health, and identify potential avenues of intervention to reduce this disparity is urgently needed.

Factors associated with non-guideline-adherent treatment for gonorrhea and chlamydia among outpatient prescriptions in the Unites States

Background: Patients at risk for sexually transmitted infections (STI) frequently receive care at non-specialized outpatient clinics staffed by physicians and advanced practice clinicians (APCs).Methods: Retrospective cohort study including adult patients diagnosed with chlamydia and/or gonorrhea at urgent care (UC), family medicine (FM), internal medicine (IM) or obstetrics and gynecology (Ob-Gyn) clinics. The effect of type of clinician on guideline-adherent treatment was estimated using logistic regression adjusted for age, type of clinic, type of infection, and (in female patients) pregnancy status.Results: A total of 1021 patients were identified, 654 (64.1%) females and 367 (35.9%) males. Overall, 12.8% (84/654) of female patients and 19.1% (70/367) of male patients received inadequate antibiotic therapy. Among females, 63.5% (415/654) were treated by APCs and 36.5% (239/654) by physicians. Odds of inadequate therapy did not differ when comparing APCs to physicians (OR 0.83 [95% CI 0.52-1.32; p = .42]). Variables independently associated with inadequate therapy were pregnancy (OR 3.80 [95% CI 1.55-6.10; p < .001]), infection with gonorrhea (OR 2.91 [95% CI 1.65-5.10; p < .0001]) and co-infection (OR 2.63 [95% CI 1.24-5.58; p = .01]) compared to infection with chlamydia alone. Compared to UC clinics, female patients treated at Ob-Gyn clinics had lower odds of inadequate therapy (OR 0.45 [95% CI 0.22-0.90; p = .02]). Among males, odds of inadequate therapy did not differ by clinician type.Conclusions: Inadequate antibiotic therapy for chlamydia and/or gonorrhea was not associated with type of clinician. These results can help guide educational strategies and resources towards the clinical settings with the greatest gaps in adequacy of management of chlamydia and gonorrhea.

Adherence to guidelines at the patient- and hospital-levels is associated with improved overall survival in patients with gastric cancer.

Adherence to evidence-based guidelines in gastric cancer is low. We aimed to evaluate adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines for gastric cancer at both patient- and hospital-levels and examine associations between guideline adherence and treatment outcomes, including overall survival (OS). We applied stage-specific, annual NCCN Guidelines (2004-2015) to patients with gastric cancer treated with curative-intent within the National Cancer Database and compared characteristics of patients who did and did not receive guideline-adherent care. Hospitals were evaluated by guideline adherence rate. We identified associations with OS through multivariable Cox regression. Of 37 659 patients included, 32% received NCCN Guideline-adherent treatment. OS was significantly associated with both guideline adherence (51 months for patients receiving guideline-adherent treatment vs. 22 for patients receiving nonadherent treatment, p < 0.001). Treatment at a hospital with higher adherence was associated with longer OS (21 months for patients treated at lowest adherence quartile hospitals vs. 37 months at highest adherence quartile hospitals, p < 0.001), regardless of type of treatment received. Guideline-adherent treatment was strongly associated with longer median OS. Guideline adherence should be used as a benchmark for focused quality improvement for physicians taking care of patients with gastric cancer and institutions at large.

The cost-effectiveness of the Dutch clinical practice guidelines for anxiety disorders

• Until now economic evaluations of the provision of guideline concordant care for patients suffering from an anxiety disorder, were based on modelling only. • The guideline-adherent group showed greater symptom reduction and fewer costs. • Further investigation of the cost-effectiveness in a controlled design is warranted. • Given the design of the study caution should be taken when making causal inferences. To examine whether adhering to the Dutch clinical practice guidelines for anxiety disorders is associated with a higher efficiency of care (i.e. cost-effective) compared to guideline-non-adherence. After the Dutch practice guidelines for anxiety disorders were implemented, adult patients diagnosed with anxiety disorder or hypochondria were approached for participation. Using medical files patients’ treatment was classified as guideline-adherent (N=81) or guideline-non-adherent (N=56). Patients completed questionnaires about severity of symptoms (SCL-90-R) and quality of life (WHOQOL-Bref) before the start of treatment and again one year later. Medical costs and productivity losses were assessed at one-year follow-up. Data of 139 patients for whom the guidelines were applicable were analyzed. From a health care perspective, the guideline-adherent treatment group had lower costs (incremental costs: -€292) and higher effect on the SCL-90-R (incremental effect: 26.17), and therefore dominated guideline-non-adherent treatment on average. There was a 68% likelihood that guideline-adherent treatment was associated with more effects and lower costs. Furthermore, guideline-adherent treatment was associated with an additional 0.09 QALY, indicating that on average more QALYs were generated for fewer costs. This study employed an uncontrolled design. Caution should be taken when making causal inferences. Patients who received guideline-adherent treatment are more likely to experience larger symptom reduction and fewer costs during follow-up than patients who do not receive guideline-adherent treatment. The results justify further investigation of the effectiveness of implementing multidisciplinary guidelines.

Predictors for guideline-nonadherence with antithrombotic therapy in outpatients with chronic atrial fibrillation

Purpose: Our aims were to determine the prevalence of physicians’ adherence to antithrombotic guidelines in the management of outpatients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) and to identify risk factors for nonadherence to treatment guidelines.&#x0D; Methods: Data on drug treatment, stroke risk factors and psychosocial variables were analyzed descriptively in a cross-sectional communitybased multicentre study. Predictors for nonadherence with guidelines for antithrombotic prophylaxis of AF patients were identified using logistic regression.&#x0D; Results: Of 413 outpatients with chronic AF attending the offices of family physicians, 184 (44.6%) were treated according to the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) 2001 guidelines. In the group of patients with a high risk of stroke (n=387), 178 patients (46.0%) received guideline-adherent treatment. 31 of the high-risk patients received coumarin although they had at least one contraindication. Multivariate analysis showed the presence of absolute contraindications to coumarins to be an independent predictor of guidelinenonadherent treatment.&#x0D; Conclusion: To improve guideline-adherence in the antithrombotic treatment in AF outpatients, strategies involving individual assessment of the risks and benefits will need to be established and implemented.

Guidelines improve patient outcomes in specialised mental health care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ObjectiveThe uptake of evidence‐based guideline recommendations appears to be challenging. In the midst of the discussion on how to overcome these barriers, the question of whether the use of guidelines leads to improved patient outcomes threatens to be overlooked. This study examined the effectiveness of evidence‐based guidelines for all psychiatric disorders on patient health outcomes in specialist mental health care. All types of evidence‐based guidelines, such as psychological and medication‐focused guidelines, were eligible for inclusion. Provider performance was measured as a secondary outcome. Time to remission when treated with the guidelines was also examined.MethodSix databases were searched until 10 August 2020. Studies were selected, and data were extracted independently according to the PRISMA guidelines. Random effects meta‐analyses were used to pool estimates across studies. Risk of bias was assessed according to the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group criteria. PROSPERO:CRD42020171311.ResultsThe meta‐analysis included 18 studies (N = 5380). Guidelines showed a positive significant effect size on the severity of psychopathological symptoms at the patient level when compared to treatment‐as‐usual (TAU) (d = 0.29, 95%‐CI = (0.19, 0.40), p < 0.001). Removal of a potential outlier gave globally the same results with Cohen's d = 0.26. Time to remission was shorter in the guideline treatment compared with TAU (HR = 1.54, 95%‐CI = (1.29, 1.84), p = 0.001, n = 3).ConclusionsPatients cared for with guideline‐adherent treatments improve to a greater degree and more quickly than patients treated with TAU. Knowledge on the mechanisms of change during guideline‐adherent treatment needs to be developed further such that we can provide the best possible treatment to patients in routine care.

Treatment Realities of Headache Disorders in Rural Germany by the Example of the Region of Western Pomerania.

(1) Background: Headache disorders are among the most disabling medical conditions but the supply with experienced providers is outpaced by the demand for service. It is unclear to what extent particularly patients in rural regions are affected by limited access to comprehensive care. Furthermore, it is unknown what role general practitioners (GPs) play in headache care. (2) Methods: First-time consultations to a specialised headache clinic at a tertiary care centre were asked to participate. Their socio-demographic background, general and headache-specific medical history, disability and quality of life (QoL) were assessed. Additionally, 176 GPs in neighbouring districts were contacted regarding headache management. (3) Results: We assessed 162 patients with first-time consultations (age 46.1 ± 17.0 years, 78.1% female), who suffered from migraine (72%), tension type, cluster and secondary headaches (each 5–10%). About 50% of patients received a new headache-diagnosis and 60% had treatment inconsistent with national guidelines. QoL was significantly worse in all domains compared to the general population. About 75% of GPs see headache patients at least several times per week, and mostly treat them by themself. (4) Conclusions: More than every second headache patient was neither correctly diagnosed nor received guideline adherent treatment. Headache-related disability is inferior to what is expected from previous studies. Access to specialised health care is more limited in rural than in urban regions in Germany and GPs request more training.

Racial-Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Guideline-Adherent Treatment for Endometrial Cancer.

To evaluate the association of race-ethnicity and neighborhood socioeconomic status with adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for endometrial carcinoma. Data are from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) cancer registry of women diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma for the years 2006-2015. The sample included 83,883 women after inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, univariate, and multivariate logistic regression models were performed to evaluate the association between race-ethnicity and neighborhood socioeconomic status with adherence to treatment guidelines. After controlling for demographic and clinical covariates, Black (odds ratio [OR] 0.89, P<.001), Latina (OR .92, P<.001), and American Indian or Alaska Native (OR 0.82, P=.034) women had lower odds of receiving adherent treatment and Asian (OR 1.14, P<.001) and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (OR 1.19 P=.012) women had higher odds of receiving adherent treatment compared with White women. After controlling for covariates, there was a gradient by neighborhood socioeconomic status: women in the high-middle (OR 0.89, P<.001), middle (OR 0.84, P<.001), low-middle (OR 0.80, P<.001), and lowest (OR 0.73, P<.001) neighborhood socioeconomic status categories had lower odds of receiving adherent treatment than the those in the highest neighborhood socioeconomic status group. Findings from this study suggest there are racial-ethnic and neighborhood socioeconomic disparities in National Comprehensive Cancer Network treatment adherence for endometrial cancer. Standard treatment therapies should not differ based on sociodemographics. Interventions are needed to ensure that equitable cancer treatment practices are available for all individuals, regardless of racial-ethnic or socioeconomic background.

Cervical Cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Multinational Population-Based Cohort Study of Care and Guideline Adherence

BackgroundCervical cancer (CC) is the most common female cancer in many countries of sub‐Saharan Africa (SSA). We assessed treatment guideline adherence and its association with overall survival (OS).MethodsOur observational study covered nine population‐based cancer registries in eight countries: Benin, Ethiopia, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Mali, Mozambique, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. Random samples of 44–125 patients diagnosed from 2010 to 2016 were selected in each. Cancer‐directed therapy (CDT) was evaluated for degree of adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (U.S.) Guidelines.ResultsOf 632 patients, 15.8% received CDT with curative potential: 5.2% guideline‐adherent, 2.4% with minor deviations, and 8.2% with major deviations. CDT was not documented or was without curative potential in 22%; 15.7% were diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IV disease. Adherence was not assessed in 46.9% (no stage or follow‐up documented, 11.9%, or records not traced, 35.1%). The largest share of guideline‐adherent CDT was observed in Nairobi (49%) and the smallest in Maputo (4%). In patients with FIGO stage I–III disease (n = 190), minor and major guideline deviations were associated with impaired OS (hazard rate ratio [HRR], 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36–8.37; HRR, 1.97; CI, 0.59–6.56, respectively). CDT without curative potential (HRR, 3.88; CI, 1.19–12.71) and no CDT (HRR, 9.43; CI, 3.03–29.33) showed substantially worse survival.ConclusionWe found that only one in six patients with cervical cancer in SSA received CDT with curative potential. At least one‐fifth and possibly up to two‐thirds of women never accessed CDT, despite curable disease, resulting in impaired OS. Investments into more radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgical training could change the fatal outcomes of many patients.Implications for PracticeDespite evidence‐based interventions including guideline‐adherent treatment for cervical cancer (CC), there is huge disparity in survival across the globe. This comprehensive multinational population‐based registry study aimed to assess the status quo of presentation, treatment guideline adherence, and survival in eight countries. Patients across sub‐Saharan Africa present in late stages, and treatment guideline adherence is remarkably low. Both factors were associated with unfavorable survival. This report warns about the inability of most women with cervical cancer in sub‐Saharan Africa to access timely and high‐quality diagnostic and treatment services, serving as guidance to institutions and policy makers. With regard to clinical practice, there might be cancer‐directed treatment options that, although not fully guideline adherent, have relevant survival benefit. Others should perhaps not be chosen even under resource‐constrained circumstances.

796. Improving Clostridioides difficile Infection Treatment and Outcomes Using a Web-based Tool to Support a Care Coordination Intervention

Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a highly burdensome disease, affecting 500,000 Americans each year. Despite extensive efforts to prevent and treat CDI, variability remains in the treatment guidelines, particularly as new medications are released. Treating CDI is particularly difficult, as approximately 25% of infected individuals experience recurrent CDI (rCDI).MethodsWe used a pre-post design to measure the impact of an intervention on rCDI, CDI readmission, and guideline-adherent treatment rates in adult patients who were admitted with or contracted CDI in the hospital. The intervention included the following:• Web-based performance platform delivering education and care coordination support• CDI care coordination for 8 weeks post-discharge (Figure 1)• Education and tools for addressing CDI guidelines, workflow needs, and patient engagement• Best practice sharing through peer-to-peer discussion callsPatient Contacts ResultsAmong the 77 patients consented in the Pre-Intervention period, 12 (15.6%) patients reported a recurrence of CDI, compared to 6 (15.4%) of the 39 Intervention patients who provided a response (P = 0.98). While a total of 55 patients were consented in the Intervention period, none reported a readmission for CDI, however 9 (11.7%) of Pre-Intervention patients reported a readmission for CDI (P = 0.03). There was a significant difference (P < 0.001) between the use of appropriate treatment, as defined by the 2018 SHEA/IDSA guidelines, between the Pre-Intervention and Intervention groups (55.8% vs. 94.3%).ConclusionA comprehensive multi-disciplinary team approach to preventing rCDI, including post-discharge care coordination, provides support to patients and caregivers. Future research is needed to evaluate how web-based tools, like those used in this study, could engage patients in the management of CDI and rCDI. Interventions aimed at improving the care of these patients may reduce recurrences and rehospitalizations.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Analysis of the impact of adherence to guidelines and expert advice in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

The European Leukemia Net (ELN) guidelines for treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) connect heterogeneous MDS subgroups with a number of therapeutic options ranging from best supportive care to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). However, it is currently unknown whether adherence to guideline recommendations translates into improved survival. The sizeable database of the Duesseldorf MDS Registry allowed us to address this question. We first performed a retrospective analysis including 1698 patients (cohort 1) to whom we retrospectively applied the ELN guidelines. We compared patients treated according to the guidelines with patients who deviated from it, either because they received a certain treatment though it was not recommended or because they did not receive that treatment despite being eligible. We also performed a prospective study with 381 patients (cohort 2) who were seen in our department and received guideline-based expert advice. Again, we compared the impact of subsequent guideline-adherent versus non-adherent treatment. For the majority of treatment options (best supportive care, lenalidomide, hypomethylating agents, low-dose chemotherapy, and intensive chemotherapy), we found that adherence to the ELN guidelines did not improve survival in cohort 1. The same was true when patient management was prospectively enhanced through guideline-based treatment advice given by MDS experts (cohort 2). The only exceptions were alloSCT and iron chelation (ICT). Patients receiving ICT and alloSCT as recommended fared significantly better than those who were eligible but received other treatment. Our analysis underscores the limited survival impact of most MDS therapies and suggests to pursue alloSCT in all suitable candidates.Graphical abstract

Ovarian cancer in California: Guideline adherence, survival, and the impact of geographic location, 1996–2014

Background: Evidence suggests that geographic location may independently contribute to ovarian cancer survival. We aimed to investigate how the association between residential location and ovarian cancer-specific survival in California varies by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.Methods: Additive Cox proportional hazard models were used to predict hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between geographic location throughout California and survival among 29,844 women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer between 1996 and 2014. We conducted permutation tests to determine a global P-value for significance of location. Adjusted analyses considered distance traveled for care, distance to closest high-quality-of-care hospital, and receipt of National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline care. Models were also stratified by stage, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.Results: Location was significant in unadjusted models (P = 0.009 among all stages) but not in adjusted models (P = 0.20). HRs ranged from 0.81 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.93) in Southern Central Valley to 1.41 (95% CI: 1.15, 1.73) in Northern California but were attenuated after adjustment (maximum HR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.27). Better survival was generally observed for patients traveling longer distances for care. Associations between survival and proximity to closest high-quality-of-care hospitals were null except for women of lowest socioeconomic status living furthest away (HR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.43).Conclusions:Overall, geographic variations observed in ovarian cancer-specific survival were due to important predictors such as receiving guideline-adherent care. Improving access to expert care and ensuring receipt of guideline-adherent treatment should be priorities in optimizing ovarian cancer survival.

Evaluation of the Management of Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Hospitalized Patients.

Background: Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) are estimated to cost $1.5 billion annually in Canada. Previous studies have shown that barely half of all patients receive ideal care in hospitals. Deviations from guideline-defined optimal care lead to longer hospital stays, readmissions, and increased mortality. Objective: To determine the proportion of patients admitted to hospital for AECOPD who received treatment adherent to guidelines. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with ethics approval from the University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board. Patients hospitalized for ≥24 hours with an AECOPD at a tertiary care center and a community hospital were assessed. Guideline-adherent treatment was defined as appropriate use of supplemental oxygen, inhaled bronchodilators, systemic corticosteroids, antibiotics, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, initiation/continuation of nicotine replacement therapy for current smokers, and vaccination optimization, reflecting international standards of care. Outcomes were assessed using descriptive statistics. Results: A random sample of 210 patients were selected of which 99 met inclusion criteria. Only 4% received therapy that met all recommendations. Differences in management were found between sites, specifically the appropriate use of bronchodilators, corticosteroids, antibiotics, and supplemental oxygen. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and smoking cessation rates were 97% and 94%, respectively, at the tertiary care center, compared with 73% and 100% at the community hospital. Additionally, less than half of all patients had their immunization history verified. Conclusion: Gaps in the inpatient management of AECOPD continue to exist. Initiatives must be targeted to optimize management and reduce the burden of the disease.

Human infections caused by Staphylococcus argenteus in Germany: genetic characterisation and clinical implications of novel species designation

We report a series of Staphylococcus argenteus infections from Saarland, Germany. Travel histories were unremarkable for extra-European sojourns, indicating an autochthonous transmission mode. Multilocus sequence typing revealed that all isolates were members of the clonal complex CC2250. In only one case, guideline-adherent treatment with an isoxazolyl penicillin was prescribed. Our report illustrates the perils of novel species designations, which may lead to misconceptions and suboptimal treatment choices among clinicians.

Cutting-edge Management of Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer in 2020 and a Glimpse into the Future

This case-based discussion describes the clinical course of a 63-yr-old patient who presented with gross hematuria and was diagnosed with a muscle-invasive bladder cancer at transurethral resection. Computed tomography revealed a locally advanced tumor, and the patient underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by open radical cystectomy with standard pelvic lymph node dissection. In a step-by-step fashion, we elaborate on diagnostic and therapeutic treatment options from two different vantage points: (1) guideline-adherent treatment with the state-of-the-art standard of care, and (2) a glimpse into the future discussing the evidence of potential additional or alternative approaches based on recent scientific advances. Patient summaryIn this case-based discussion, we follow the clinical course of a patient with advanced bladder cancer and elaborate how the state-of-the-art treatment looks like in 2020, based on the best available evidence. This is compared with potential future treatment strategies, which may change and alternate our understanding of optimal bladder cancer care.