Phycologists have long recognized that there are algae which grow only in torrents, or at least grow best in rapidly running water. Among these are Lemanea, Hildenbrandtia, Audouinella, Batrachospermum spp., Hydrurus, and Cladophora spp. Microscopic types are represented by Gongosira, Lithoderma, Chamaesiphon, and several species of diatoms. (Butcher 1932, 1940, Fritsch 1935, Chapman 1941, Smith 1950, Tiffany 1951). In southern streams several other species such as Oedogonium kurzii, Vaucheria ornithocephala, and Compsopogon coeruleus are found only in rapids (Whitford 1956, Schumacher and Whitford 1959). For many years it was believed these rapids species grow in streams because lower water temperatures and better aerated water occur there. Evidence lacking to bear out these assumptions. There evidence, however, that some rapids species have a higher respiratory rate than corresponding lenitic species. Limnologists especially have come to recognize an inherent current demand for some species but offer no explanation (Welch 1952). As long ago as 1926 Ruttner partially explained the phenomenon. He pointed out that in quiet water a film deficient in vital materials forms at the surface of a plant or animal, and that in swift water this film swept away thereby bringing more vital materials close to the absorbing surfaces. Moving water, he said, is not absolutely, but rather physiologically, richer in oxygen and nutrients. This physiological richness can be explained on the basis of the laws of cohesion and diffusion. In quiet water a material diffusing inward lowest in concentration at the cell surface, and the concentration increases outward until full concentration reached at some distance away from the cell (Fig. 1). This distance one of the factors determining the gradient. In swift water some of the water low in concentration of the diffusing material swept away bringing water of full concentration closer to the cell surface, thus shortening the distance and steepening the gradient. This increases speed of exchange between the cell and the surrounding water. For the smaller inorganic molecules the gradient extends outward about f4 mm. Evidence for this as well as for the existence of a diffusion shell given in papers by Ferrell, Beatty, and Richardson (1955). They measured fluid-velocity profiles in small glass tubes using various colored and radio-active dissolved materials. In every case the profiles deviated from the expected theoretical figure near the tube wall. The deviation varied also with the size molecule of solute and the density of the solvent. Their conclusion, which seems entirely valid, that outward from the quiet water near the wall produced these deviations. The deviation occurred within }/oo inch (0.26 mm.) of the wall (Figs. 2, 3). Furthermore, the deviation could not be