Ross Woodman with Joel Faflak, Revelation and Knowledge: Romanticism and Religious Faith (University of Toronto Press, 2011) xlix + 234 $65.00 In Revelation and Knowledge: Romanticism and Religious Ross Woodman and Joel Faflak display their vast reading, not only of Romantic-era texts, but also in theory, psychoanalysis, quantum physics, and a host of other fascinating topics. Revelation and Knowledge relates to other psychoanalytical studies on Romanticism, such as D. J. Moores' Dark Enlightenment: Jung, Romanticism, and the Repressed Other (2010), as well as recent studies on Romanticism, poetic expression, and Christian faith, such as George S. Williamson's monograph on German Romanticism, Longing for Myth in Germany: Religion and Aesthetic Culture from Romanticism to Nietzsche (2004) and J. Robert Barth's Romanticism and Transcendence: Wordsworth, Coleridge, and the Religious Imagination (2003). Woodman's book also relates to recent works on religion and English Romanticism, such as Mark Canuel's Religion, Toleration, and British Writing, 1790-1830 (2002) and Daniel E. White's Early Romanticism and Religious Dissent (2006). However, those monographs explore the political and social context of religious themes in British Romanticism, while Woodman's examines how religious belief, or faith, related to literary composition and the psycho-spiritual goals of Romanticism. Given the considerable focus on Shia Islam in Revelation and Knowledge, though, may also be said to contribute to critical work on Romanticism and Eastern religions, such as Mark Lussier's Romantic Dharma: Emergence of Buddhism into Nineteenth-Century Europe (2011) and John G. Rudy's Romanticism and Zen Buddhism (2004). What distinguishes Woodman's study from most other scholarly works, however, its autobiographical focus. In this respect, Revelation and Knowledge virtually in a category of its own. Woodman's Sanity, Madness, Transformation (2009) provides the most apt critical context. In this work, Woodman explored the connections between sanity and madness, contemporary literary theory (such as Jacques Derrida's), and modern psychoanalytic theory and literary criticism (particularly Carl Jung, Sigmund Freud, and Northrop Frye). Working with many of the same sources and towards a similar goal, Woodman illustrates in Revelation and Knowledge that the apparent fissure between religious and poetic faith in the works of the British Romantics does not illustrate the absence of meaning or the triumph of Enlightenment materialism, but, rather, a ground-swelling of psychic activity in the poets, who grapple with the task of representing the mystical through the fallen medium of language--and sometimes because what they have discovered in themselves transcendent, forbidden psychological terrain that must remain unrepresented in order to protect the self (51). To a certain extent, then, madness haunts this study too: The challenge confronting the creative imagination, Woodman claims, is not the mind's inability to know itself as the Cogito, but rather its ability to work creatively with madness by rationally absorbing madness without reducing it to a simplified and yet unknowable quantity (140-1). Woodman a leading authority on psychoanalytic criticism, and he demonstrates his mastery of the subject in Revelation and Knowledge. In a thirty-six page introduction, Beyond Belief/ Having Faith, Joel Faflak reflects on his experiences as Woodman's student at the University of Western Ontario, beginning with an undergraduate course on Romanticism in 1979. (Although we have never met, Woodman began teaching English literature at the University of Manitoba, 1972, where I work). In Woodman's class, Faflak writes, he glimpsed how delusion might be an acceptable, even fundamental, facet of one's relationship to the world (xiv), particularly a literary scholar's understanding of Romanticism. …