Group Of Reading Disabled Children Research Articles

The relations between reading and spelling: an examination of subtypes of reading disability

Three groups of reading-disabled children were found in studies of English, German, and French: a group with a double deficit in reading and spelling, a group with a single spelling deficit, and a more rarely reported group presenting a single reading deficit. This study set out to examine whether these groups can be found in adults, readers and spellers of Hebrew, which differs from the previously studied orthographies in many aspects. To this end, Hebrew-speaking adults with or without reading disability were administered various literacy and literacy-related tests. Results confirm the existence of the same three groups. While all shared a phonological deficit, subtle differences in phonological decoding ability and in speed of processing distinguished between the groups. The study therefore suggests that the previously reported associations and dissociations between reading and spelling are not restricted to English, German, or French and may not be only developmental in nature.

The development of phonemic awareness in reading-disabled children

Reading-disabled children display a phonemic awareness deficit when compared with normally achieving children matched for word reading ability. However, previous research has not examined phonemic awareness deficits in reading-disabled children when compared with children matched on pseudoword reading. This article examines phonemic awareness ability in both a traditional design and a pseudoword reading level match design. The results show that a group of reading-disabled children who show typical pseudoword reading and phonemic awareness deficits in the traditional reading level match design nonetheless have phonemic awareness skills commensurate with their level of pseudoword reading ability.

Prevalence of Reading Disability in Boys and Girls

We hypothesized that results of previous investigations indicating an increased prevalence of reading disability in boys compared with girls reflected a bias in subject selection. In an epidemiologic sample of 215 girls and 199 boys, we identified two groups of reading-disabled children: research identified and school identified. Results indicated no significant differences in the prevalence of reading disability in research-identified boys compared with research-identified girls in either second (17[8.7%] of 196 boys; 15[6.9%] of 216 girls) or third grade (18[9.0%] of 199 boys; 13[6.0%] of 215 girls). In contrast, school identification resulted in the classification of 27 (13.6%) of 198 boys and seven (3.2%) of 216 girls in second grade and 20 (10.0%) of 199 boys and nine (4.2%) of 215 girls in third grade. Our data indicate that school-identified samples are almost unavoidably subject to a referral bias and that reports of an increased prevalence of reading disability in boys may reflect this bias in ascertainment. These findings caution against relying solely on schools for identification of reading-disabled children.

A Comparison between the Neale Analysis of Reading Ability and the South African Scholastic Achievement Test

Two tests of reading ability, the Neale Analysis of Reading Ability and the South African Scholastic Achievement Test, were psychometrically compared. Both tests were administered to a group of reading disabled children and a statistical analysis of the results was undertaken. The correlation between the tests was found to be high, and a high degree of internal consistency was demonstrated for the Scholastic Achievement Test. These findings indicate that unless there is a special reason for using a relatively old test, and one which has not been standardized on a South African population, the South African Scholastic Achievement Test should be selected.

Reading disabled children are aware of their cognitive deficits.

A group of reading disabled children were compared with a control group on a battery of cognitive tests. Following each test, the children were asked to rate their own performance relative to how they thought other children of their own age would perform. The ratings showed that the reading disabled children had a surprisingly accurate awareness of their own deficits. It was concluded that this self-knowledge derived from the recognition of an operation common to reading (or perhaps spelling) and the tests on which they performed badly. Both the performance and the rating data provided a reasonable fit with the hypothesis that this operation involved phonological patterning or sound-blending.

Short-term memory deficits in reading disabled children, in the absence of opportunity for rehearsal strategies

Two groups of reading-disabled (RD) children were compared with controls (age- and IQ-matched competent readers), on a serial running memory task. The unknown (to the subject) length of the serial lists coupled with high rates of presentation, made it impossible for the children to use systematic rehearsal strategies in this task. Both groups of RD children performed reliably worse than their controls. From the data, it is argued that the short-term memory deficits exhibited by the RD children should not be attributed to an inability to rehearse, nor to an inability to encode (recognize) items, but rather to an inability to encode serial items in the form of serial phonological patterns.

An investigative study of the Bender-Gestalt: Clinical validation of its use with a reading disabled population

Investigated usefulness of the Bender-Gestalt in differentiating between primary and secondary reading disability. Research with 50 reading disabled Ss was carried out. The Ss were classified as having a primary or secondary reading disability according to selected criteria; then their Bender protocols were scored. It was hypothesized that developmental scores would differentiate the two diagnostic groups. A second hypothesis was that specific signs would differentiate between primary and secondary reading disabled children. The results supported the latter hypothesis, but not the former. Results also showed that those in the primary group were more reading retarded than secondary reading disability Ss and that Bender-Gestalt scores are not significantly related to reading level in such a group of reading disabled children.

Wisc Characteristics of Reading Disabled Children Identified by Three Objective Methods

The WISC and Spache Reading Diagnostic Scales were administered to 119 third-grade children. Groups of reading disabled children were selected by three objective methods (Below Grade Level, Bond and Tinker, and the Erickson Z-score Discrepancy). The Below Grade Level and Bond and Tinker methods tended to identify the same children whose IQs and reading achievement scores were below average. The Z-score method identified children with IQs at or above the group average. Comparison of the poor readers with control groups matched for IQ and sex gave only minimal evidence for WISC subtest patterns as characteristic of poor readers.