This qualitative study describes midlife spiritual practices of 2 groups of minority women, 1 lesbian/bisexual group and 1 Black group. Each group attended 3 focus group meetings in New York City. Grounded theory was used for data analysis. Implications for counselors working with middle-aged women were discussed. ********** Existing literature on women's midlife development reflects substantial shifts in psychosocial paradigms. Three shifts are explored in this introduction: increased human life expectancy, emergence of gender-specific research, and focus on spirituality. In context of new paradigms for understanding women's midlife development, I then describe my prior research (Howell, 2001; Howell & Beth, 2002), which was used as baseline for current research. INCREASED LIFE EXPECTANCY OF HUMANS A rapidly changing figure, life expectancy now exceeds 80 years. Midlife has, therefore, become gateway to old age. As result, various definitions of midlife exist. Mansfield, Theisen, and Boyer (1992) used parameters of 35 and 55. Lacy (1986) and Levinson (1978, 1996) defined midlife as ages 40 to 60, and Borysenko (1996) used ages 42 to 62 to define midlife. In contrast, some researchers did not tie midlife to age at all. Rubin (1979) and England and Finch (1991), for instance, said that midlife began when women's children left home. Most recently, I (Howell, 2001) interviewed women from ages 35 to 60 and found that participants who were below age of 40 did not identify with what was being shared by older members of focus groups. In addition, members of groups strongly believed that midlife starred as late as 45 or 50 for most women. They did not argue with upper limit of 60. As life expectancy increased, attitudes about midlife occurrences such as menopause also changed. Sheehy's (1991) seminal book called menopause silent passage. With tone of dread and frustration, one section was titled, the need to know and fear of knowing. Another was titled the perimenopause panic. In contrast, 10 years later Northrup (2001) reflected more positive attitudes in her book, The Wisdom of Menopause: Creating Physical and Emotional Healing During Change. Likewise, Voda (1997) challenged popular conceptualization of menopause as disease requiring treatment, conceptualizing it instead as normal transition. The paradigm of women's midlife experience has shifted from senescence (de Beauvoir, 1989; Sheehy, 1991) to one of vitality; enthusiasm, and wisdom (Borysenko, 1996; Northrup, 2001; Voda, 1997). GENDER-SPECIFIC RESEARCH As result of work of Miller (1976) and Gilligan (1982), theorists challenged popular practice of applying classic androgynous psychological theories such as Erikson's (1978) to both men and women. Subsequently, two theorists (Borysenko, 1996; Levinson, 1996) created comprehensive developmental models for women. Other theorists (Doress & Siegal, 1987; Love, 1998; Northrup, 2001; Rubin, 1979; Sheehy, 1991; Voda, 1997) conducted research that focused on uniquely female experiences. SPIRITUALITY The third major shift in psychosocial paradigm for understanding midlife involved spirituality; Jungian practitioners Brewi and Brennan (1999) described psychological challenge of midlife as a call back to wholeness (p. 11). They described classical Jungian process of exploring shadow, or to contact and integrate neglected aspects of personal unconscious (p. 59). Another Jungian, Hollis (1996), described midlife process as one of re-imagin[ing] ourselves in order to live in present (p. 142). In final chapter of their book, Brewi and Brennan discussed importance of religion in process of exploring unconscious. Hollis said that, during midlife, he drew from Bible and the wisdom of great writers (p. 136). …