IN THIS essay I wish to examine the proposition that the main function of the Dravidian kinship categories is to regulate marriage and sexual relations inside bilateral and largely endogamous 'kindreds. The proposition is discussed mainly in the context of Sinhalese kinship, but the argument has bearing upon the kinship systems of other groups in South India and Ceylon, and the comparative evidence is examined in the last section of the essay.1 The Dravidian terminology we are here concerned with has been noted for its connection with a prescriptive, bilateral, cross-cousin marriage rule. In this respect, the terminology is highly systematic, and all the terms imply bilateral cross-cousin marriage, and such marriage is essential if the categories of kinship are to be kept in order (Dumont 1953). While the kinship categories are thus highly systematic, Sinhalese society, in particular, has been referred to as loosely (Ryan 1953:21). I suggest in this essay that the apparently loose kinship structure, while certainly permissive in many important respects, is very highly structured with regard to marriage and sexual relations. In the Sinhalese context, the kindred is not simply an amorphous group, which differs from individual to individual, but has an identity as a kin group and exhibits considerable solidarity in diverse contexts. It is the most important social group as far as the individual Sinhalese is concerned. And thus, the systematic kinship categories organize the vital relations of marriage and sex within these small groups. This argument regarding Dravidian kinship categories is supported by the relevant material from other groups in South India and Ceylon as well. If the kindred type explanation of systematic Dravidian categories, and prescriptive marriage rules, stands up to analysis, our conclusions will have implications for the Australian material. For, as is well known, the Dravidian terminology is almost identical with the Kariera type, and what is true for South India and Ceylon may also apply to some features of the kinship systems of Australia.
Read full abstract