Predictions and understanding of runoff and soil loss could be improved if the effect of variable rainfall intensity during a storm were quantified. We quantified and compared effects of constant (Ic) and variable (Iv) rainfall intensity patterns on infiltration, runoff, soil loss, and interrill erodibilities (Ki) from a Tifton loamy sand (Plinthic Kandiudult) and a Greenville sandy clay loam (Rhodic Kandiudult). Each soil was air-dried, sieved (19 mm) and then placed in a 1.5-m2 stainless steel erosion pan (Tifton = 4% slope; Greenville = 7% slope). Simulated rainfall was applied for 70 min at a constant (57 mm h−1) and variable rainfall intensity patterns. The Ic event was determined from the statistical average of the Iv pattern; thus, total rainfall volume applied was the same for both patterns. Values for runoff (R), soil loss (E), splash water (Sw), and splash sediment (Ss) were measured at 5-min intervals throughout each simulation. Rainfall intensity patterns did not affect total runoff or infiltration, but they did influence Rmax values, when runoff occurred, and soil loss from each soil. Runoff curves for Iv events (peaks = 25–28 min) lagged intensity curves (peak = 20 min) by 5–8 min. Rmax values for Iv events were significantly (2 X) greater than those for Ic events and occurred 35–37 min before those for the Ic events. For the Tifton ls, Etot for Ic events was signficantly greater (2 X) than that for Iv events. Conversely, for the Greenville scl, Etot for Iv events was significantly greater (20%) than that for Ic events. For the Greenville scl, Emax for Iv events was significantly greater (3 X) than that for Ic events, whereas time to Emax for both soils was 16 min earlier for Iv events than for Ic events. Runoff and soil loss rates for Ic events increased gradually during the first 35–40 min before reaching steady-state conditions, whereas runoff and soil loss rates for Iv events increased sharply to a maximum at 25–29 min and then gradually declined to quasi-steady-state conditions. As a result, Iv events had about 28% more rainfall run-off and 32% more soil loss during the first 35 min of each event than for Ic events. Conversely, Ic events had about 28% more rainfall run-off and 32% more soil loss during the last 35 min of each event than for Iv events. For Ic events, capacity to transport sediment was limited by the lack of runoff during the first 35–40 min, whereas during the second half of each simulation event, runoff was well established at steady-state rates and able to transport sediment. Soil detachment was maintained or supplied at a constant or increased rate. R70 and E70 values were greater than R35 and E35 values. Greater r2 values were obtained for the R versus E relationship (r2 = 0. 98) than for the Ss versus E relationship (r2 = 0.28) on the Tifton ls, whereas relatively high r2 values were obtained for R versus E (r2 = 0. 99) and Ss versus E (r2 = 0.81) on the Greenville scl. For Iv events, there were detachment- and transport-limiting conditions, especially near the end of each event where capacity to detach soil and transport sediment decreased. R70, E70, and Ss70 values were less than R35, E35, and Ss35 values, and relatively high r2 values were obtained for R versus E (r2 = 0. 94–0. 99) and Ss versus E (r2 = 0.91–0.96). The Greenville scl was 75–97% more erodible than the Tifton ls. Kiq values were 16–30% larger than Kii values. Variable rainfall intensity causes problems, conceptually and mathematically, when calculating Ki. Ki values were not solely a property of the soil, were not constant, and did not increase as soil loss increased. Emax values were up to 13 times greater than steady-state soil loss values, yet Ki values for steady-state conditions were 3–5 times greater than those for maximum loss conditions. If Ki represents the susceptibility of a soil to erosional forces, and since rainfall intensity distributions, runoff, and soil loss within a rainfall event are not constant, then, according to our results, Ki distributions within the same event should not be assumed constant.
Read full abstract