Green Firebreaks Research Articles

Can green firebreaks help balance biodiversity, carbon storage and wildfire risk?

Green firebreaks (strategically placed plantings of low-flammability vegetation) are designed to reduce the rate of fire spread and thereby increase the suppressibility of fires. Successful examples have led to some fire-prone regions investing heavily in the establishment of green firebreaks as a method of reducing fire risk while improving biodiversity and carbon storage. However, beyond small-scale case studies there has been little research quantitatively exploring the interactions among biodiversity, carbon, and wildfire risk in relation to green firebreaks. Here, we combine a Bayesian Network (BN) analysis, and fire simulations in PHOENIX RapidFire (hereafter Phoenix), to identify planting designs that reduce wildfire risks while also providing positive biodiversity and carbon outcomes. Using a BN analysis, we prioritised optimal planting designs as the combination of elements (e.g., stem density, distance from houses, shrub design, age etc.) that delivered the greatest increase in biodiversity and carbon while reducing fire risk to people and property for eight sites across south-eastern Australia. We ranked combinations of planting designs, prioritising house, and life loss first, to identify optimal designs. Optimal planting designs varied among sites, although the design elements that best reduced risk to houses and lives were consistent. These elements included ‘scattered’ shrubs and planting densities of trees consistent with an open forest structure. Estimated fuel loads for the optimal planting design at each site were used to create a simulated revegetation area in Phoenix. We simulated fire behaviour in Phoenix across a grid of ∼1000 ignitions for each site, and for up to 54 historic weather conditions for a 'current fuel’ scenario (no green firebreaks present) compared with a ‘green firebreak fuel’ scenario. We found that the establishment of a green firebreak did not result in significant changes to fire behaviour at most sites. In some cases, it reduced risk to people and property, and where fire behaviour did change in terms of intensity, frequency, ember attack and overall risk, the differences relative to the current fuel scenario were less than two percent. Overall, simulated green firebreaks in most cases were found to provide biodiversity and carbon benefits without increasing fire risk. These findings illustrate their potential as an effective nature-based solution for managing multiple priorities; however, further testing of real plantings is required to evaluate this potential as an at-scale solution.

Fire traps in the wet subtropics: New perspectives from Hong Kong

Abstract Fires undermine efforts to restore degraded forests in the wet tropics and subtropics. Grasslands and shrublands established after fires are more fire susceptible than forests and tend to be set alight more often, creating a positive feedback loop that curbs succession (i.e. create a fire trap). Understanding the factors that underpin the strength of these fire traps could transform restoration programmes by identifying the steps needed to escape them. Fire traps are notoriously challenging to quantify because multiple factors influence fire occurrence and vegetation recovery. Here we used multi‐decadal satellite imagery from Landsat to create a 34‐year time series of burn areas and vegetation dynamics in wet subtropical Hong Kong. These dynamic maps were then used to characterise (1) the influence of successional stage on fire occurrence, having accounted for topographical and ignition source imbalances using neighbourhood analyses and entropy balancing (EBAL) weights, and (2) recovery time to the next successional stage by survival analysis with EBAL weights. Our analyses revealed that fire regimes in the wet subtropics are defined by strong fire‐vegetation feedbacks. Grasslands and shrublands were 20 and 9 times more susceptible to fires than forests in similar topographic positions. Human activities compounded these differences by disproportionally introducing more ignition sources to grasslands (2.3 times) and shrublands (2.0 times) than to forests. Burnt shrublands recovered to forests faster (19 years) than grasslands (40 years). Proximity to forest patches had strong positive effects on recovery rates, highlighting the importance of seed sources. Post‐fire recovery was faster on wetter northwest‐facing sites and valleys. Overall, topography strongly influenced recovery processes but hardly affected fire occurrence. Synthesis and applications. Our study provides the first quantification of fire trap processes in the wet subtropics, which provides new opportunities for evidence‐based fire suppression and post‐fire restoration. Our results suggest that (1) fire traps could be mitigated by fire suppression programmes as the traps are currently exacerbated by ignition source imbalance; (2) establishing green fire breaks represents an effective fire suppression measure in the wet subtropics; and (3) active restoration could target areas where models predict sluggish post‐fire natural regeneration.

Shoot flammability differences between forest and savanna trees are driven by leaf dry matter content

Climate change has led to increased fire risk in many tropical regions, with concerning implications for fire-sensitive forests. Understanding the comparative fire ecology of co-occurring fire-prone and fire sensitive habitats and the drivers of canopy fires is paramount for recognizing fire risk and for selecting plants that may be planted in green firebreaks that could mitigate wildfire damage to these habitats. However, baseline plant flammability data is needed from both habitats. To accomplish this, we compared three flammability measures (maximum temperature, total burn time and burnt biomass) by burning branches of 35 species in a fire-protected forest and fire-prone savanna in tropical northeast Australia. We also measured a set of leaf functional traits (leaf area, leaf mass per unit area and leaf dry matter content) on these species and examined their relationship with shoot flammability. We found that maximum temperature, burnt biomass, and burn time were significantly higher in savanna compared to forest species. Leaf area and leaf mass per unit area did not influence flammability measures, but species with higher leaf dry matter content had a higher percentage of biomass burnt, burnt for longer and hotter. Underpinning these observations, savanna species had significantly higher leaf dry matter content than forest species. Our results enable us to recommend species with low flammability that could be used in the green firebreaks in the study area to mitigate fire risk in sensitive forest habitats. Future studies should look experimentally at the effectiveness of green firebreaks using low flammability species, and examine their post fire recovery.

The effect of broadleaf forests in wildfire mitigation in the WUI – A simulation study

The increasing occurrence of large wildfires in Southern European countries calls for the adoption of more effective measures of fire prevention, to protect people and infrastructures, namely in the Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI). Previous research suggests that broadleaf forests could mitigate the effects of these wildfires due to their lower flammability. However, few attempts have been made to investigate the possibility of using broadleaf-based green firebreaks to protect infrastructures, as an alternative to current less ecologically and economically sustainable fuel reduction techniques. Here, we assess the relevance of a broadleaves fuel model in reducing fire hazard in the WUI, by analyzing a set of six Industrial Zones (IZs) in Central Portugal, severely affected by wildfires during the catastrophic fire season of 2017. We developed alternative scenarios for the spatial simulation of fire behavior, using a factorial combination of weather conditions (standard and extreme), buffer around each IZ (distances of 100 m and 500 m) and land cover (current and broadleaves fuel model). The simulations were grounded on real-world data obtained from reconstructed fire front isochrones and fieldwork. Our results suggest that replacing the flammable vegetation present in the WUI with broadleaf forests could reduce fireline intensity by up to five times, even under extreme weather conditions. This reduction occurs subtly as the broadleaf cover interface is expanded from 100 m to 500 m. Our results show that fires that exceed the suppression capacity in pine and eucalypt forests (>4 m flame length) can be effectively suppressed in broadleaf forests under extreme fire weather (1.4 m flame length) and easily suppressed in broadleaf forests in standard weather (0.8 m flame length). Due to significant changes in land use and extreme weather events, future large wildfires could occur again in Portugal. In this regard, our results corroborate the urgent need to discuss forest management in the country, which has already proven to be insufficient to prevent fire disasters in the WUI.

Growth form and functional traits influence the shoot flammability of tropical rainforest species

Canopy fires are increasing globally with anthropogenic climate and land-use changes, even in fire-sensitive rainforest ecosystems. Identifying the ecological drivers that may be aiding canopy fires, such as species or growth form flammability, is crucial to recognising and mitigating fire risks. To address this, we quantified the shoot-flammability of 124 rainforest plant species using an experimental approach. We compared three flammability measures (burnt biomass, total burn time and maximum temperature reached) with plant functional traits across seven different growth forms (i.e., canopy, pioneer, and understory trees; pioneer, understory and invasive shrubs, and vines) and nine common plant families and other higher-level clades, such as conifers, hereafter abbreviated to families. From burning > 600 sun-exposed shoots, we found trees were higher in flammability than shrubs and vines, and the plant families: Sapindaceae, Proteaceae, Fabaceae, and Lauraceae, had especially high flammability, whereas Moraceae was very low. Of the functional traits examined, leaf dry matter content was consistently and significantly positively associated with species flammability. Invasive shrubs as a group were not particularly flammable, although there were exceptions, e.g., wild tobacco (Solanum mauritianum) was highly flammable. This study has two important implications for the management of fire in rainforests. First, we have demonstrated that many tropical rainforest trees may readily burn under severe fire conditions if fire were to reach the rainforest canopy. Second, a large proportion of the > 1 million rainforest trees planted in the Wet Tropics under restoration planting schemes are from our most flammable rainforest plant families, as these families are often recommended for their carbon sequestration potential. Hence, these plantings may be highly vulnerable to fire and if planted along the borders of primary forest they may carry fire into their canopies. Therefore, where fire risk is high, we recommend planting species with low flammability along borders of plantings and forests to act as ‘green firebreaks’ to reduce the risk of fire incursions.

Relationships between Burn Severity and Environmental Drivers in the Temperate Coniferous Forest of Northern China

Burn severity is a key component of fire regimes and is critical for quantifying fires’ impacts on key ecological processes. The spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of forest burn severity are closely related to its environmental drivers prior to the fire occurrence. The temperate coniferous forest of northern China is an important part of China’s forest resources and has suffered frequent forest fires in recent years. However, the understanding of environmental drivers controlling burn severity in this fire-prone region is still limited. To fill the gap, spatial pattern metrics including pre-fire fuel variables (tree canopy cover (TCC), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and live fuel moisture content (LFMC)), topographic variables (elevation, slope, and topographic radiation aspect index (TRASP)), and weather variables (relative humidity, maximum air temperature, cumulative precipitation, and maximum wind speed) were correlated with a remote sensing-derived burn severity index, the composite burn index (CBI). A random forest (RF) machine learning algorithm was applied to reveal the relative importance of the environmental drivers mentioned above to burn severity for a fire. The model achieved CBI prediction accuracy with a correlation coefficient (R) equal to 0.76, root mean square error (RMSE) equal to 0.16, and fitting line slope equal to 0.64. The results showed that burn severity was mostly influenced by flammable live fuels and LFMC. The elevation was the most important topographic driver, and meteorological variables had no obvious effect on burn severity. Our findings suggest that in addition to conducting strategic fuel reduction management activities, planning the landscapes with fire-resistant plants with higher LFMC when possible (e.g., “Green firebreaks”) is also indispensable for lowering the burn severity caused by wildfires in the temperate coniferous forests of northern China.

Flammability of urban ornamental species for use in green firebreaks

-

An Integrated Approach to Identify Low-Flammability Plant Species for Green Firebreaks

With recent and predicted increases in the frequency and intensity of wildfires, there is a pressing need for mitigation strategies to reduce the impacts of wildfires on human lives, infrastructure and biodiversity. One strategy involves the use of low-flammability plants to build green firebreaks at the wildland–urban interface. It is common, however, to encounter uncertainty in a diverse range of stakeholders about the concept of flammability as it applies to plants, which may impede efforts to identify suitable low-flammability plant species. Here, we provide an approach to identify low-flammability plant species that integrates three fundamental and relatively easy-to-measure plant-flammability attributes – ignitibility, sustainability and combustibility – in a way that removes confusion about the concept of plant flammability. These three intrinsic flammability attributes relate to each other such that an ideal low-flammability species is one that is slow to ignite, sustains burning for a short period of time and combusts with low intensity. Consideration is then given to secondary attributes of plants critical to the selection of low-flammability plants, including attributes that influence the volume of fuel available for fires and the vertical and horizontal spread of fires. More work is urgently needed across the world to identify low-flammability plant species using standardised measurement protocols, and our integrated approach provides a transparent way to ensure we are selecting the right species, for the right location, in green firebreaks.

Relationships among leaf flammability attributes and identifying low-leaf-flammability species at the wildland–urban interface

Leaf flammability is a multidimensional plant functional trait with emerging importance for wildfire risk management. Understanding relationships among leaf flammability attributes not only provides information about the properties of leaves as fuels in the wildland–urban interface (WUI), it can also offer an effective way to identify low-leaf-flammability species. We examined relationships between leaf ignitibility, sustainability and combustibility among 60 plant species of the WUI of eastern Australia. We found that leaf ignitibility and sustainability worked in opposition to each other as dimensions of flammability. Species with leaves that were slow to ignite were those with leaves that sustained burning for the longest, whereas species with leaves that were fast to ignite had leaves that burned for the shortest periods of time. Low leaf combustibility was related to short leaf burning sustainability but not to ignitibility. We created an overall leaf flammability index (OLFI) to rank species on emergent properties of ignitibility, sustainability and combustibility attributes in combination. We found that low-leaf-flammability species with low OLFI values had small leaf area, high leaf mass per area and high leaf water content. Our findings have implications for species selection for green firebreaks in the WUI.

Green firebreaks as a management tool for wildfires: Lessons from China

Wildfire is a widespread natural hazard that is expected to increase in areal extent, severity and frequency with ongoing changes in climate and land-use. One tool that has been used in an effort to reduce the damage caused by wildfires is green firebreaks: strips of low-flammability vegetation grown at strategic locations in the landscape. Green firebreaks are increasingly being recommended for wildfire management and have been implemented in many countries. The approach is particularly widely used in China, where more than 364,000 km of green firebreaks have been planted and a further 167,000 km are planned for construction before 2025. China is not only a world leader in the implementation of green firebreaks but has also led the way in testing the effectiveness of green firebreaks and in providing guidelines for green firebreak construction. However, most of this research has been reported in the non-English literature, and so is inaccessible to many readers. Here we review the extensive research on the construction and effectiveness of green firebreaks in China and examine how the lessons learned from this research could contribute to the effective implementation of green firebreaks globally. Chinese studies suggest that the ideal species for green firebreaks should meet trait requirements from three perspectives: ecological, silvicultural and economic. Green firebreaks with a multi-layered structure and a closed canopy have the potential to be an effective, long-term, biodiversity-friendly and low-cost tool for fire suppression, although they complement rather than replace other more traditional fire suppression approaches.

Can Air Quality Management Drive Sustainable Fuels Management at the Temperate Wildland-Urban Interface?

Sustainable fire management has eluded all industrial societies. Given the growing number and magnitude of wildfire events, prescribed fire is being increasingly promoted as the key to reducing wildfire risk. However, smoke from prescribed fires can adversely affect public health and breach air quality standards. Here we propose that air quality standards can lead to the development and adoption of sustainable fire management approaches that lower the risk of economically and ecologically damaging wildfires while improving air quality and reducing climate-forcing emissions. For example, green fire breaks at the wildland-urban interface (WUI) can resist the spread of wildfires into urban areas. These could be created through mechanical thinning of trees, and then maintained by targeted prescribed fire to create biodiverse and aesthetically pleasing landscapes. The harvested woody debris could be used for pellets and other forms of bioenergy in residential space heating and electricity generation. Collectively, such an approach would reduce the negative health impacts of smoke pollution from wildfires, prescribed fires, and combustion of wood for domestic heating. We illustrate such possibilities by comparing current and potential fire management approaches in the environmentally similar landscapes of Vancouver Island in British Columbia, Canada and the island state of Tasmania in Australia.

Selecting Low-Flammability Plants as Green Firebreaks within Sustainable Urban Garden Design

In response to an increasing risk of property loss from wildfires at the urban–wildland interface[…]

Managing Fire and Biodiversity in the Wildland-Urban Interface: A Role for Green Firebreaks

In the wildland-urban interface, the imperative is often to protect life and property from destructive fires, while also conserving biodiversity. One potential tool for achieving this goal is the use of green firebreaks: strips of low flammability species planted at strategic locations to help reduce fire spread by slowing or stopping the fire front, extinguishing embers or blocking radiant heat. If comprised of native species, green firebreaks also have biodiversity benefits. Green firebreaks have been recommended for use throughout the world, including the Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australasia. However, despite this widespread endorsement, there has been little empirical testing of green firebreaks, particularly with field experiments. This knowledge gap needs addressing. Green firebreaks should be considered as part of the revegetation strategy following recent extensive wildfires in places such as New Zealand and Chile.

Sediment yield and alternatives soil conservation practices of teak catchments

Quantifying sediment is essential to determine its sources and reduce its negative impacts. A study was conducted to quantify suspended sediments of catchments covering by teak plantation and to provide alternatives soil conservation practices. Five catchments with old teak coverages of 82; 82; 74; 70; and 53 % were chosen. At the outlet of each catchment was installed tide gauge to monitor stream water level (SWL). Water samples for sediment analyses were taken for every increament of SWL. Sediment yield was calculated based on rating curves of sediment discharge. The results showed that the sources of sediment in the streams were dryland agricultural and streambank erosion. The mean annual sediment yield during the study were 9.3; 10; 15; 53.3; and 22.5 t/ha for catchments covered by old teak plantation of 82, 82, 74, 70, and 53 %, respectively. To reduce sediment yield some soil conservation practices must be applied. Conservation of soil organic matter is important in order to stabilize soil aggregate and prevent clay dispersion which causes erosion and sedimentation. Green firebreaks or making channels are needed to prevent fire during dry season and organic matter loss. Stabilization of streambank is neccesary, either using vegetative method or civil technics.

A quantitative assessment of shoot flammability for 60 tree and shrub species supports rankings based on expert opinion

Fire is an important ecological disturbance in vegetated ecosystems across the globe, and also has considerable impacts on human infrastructure. Vegetation flammability is a key bottom-up control on fire regimes and on the nature of individual fires. Although New Zealand (NZ) historically had low fire frequencies, anthropogenic fires have considerably impacted indigenous vegetation as humans used fire extensively to clear forests. Few studies of vegetation flammability have been undertaken in NZ and only one has compared the flammability of indigenous plants; this was a qualitative assessment derived from expert opinion. We addressed this knowledge gap by measuring the flammability of terminal shoots from a range of trees and shrubs found in NZ. We quantified shoot flammability of 60 indigenous and exotic species, and compared our experimentally derived ranking with expert opinion. The most flammable species was the invasive exotic shrub Gorse (Ulex europaeus), followed by Manna Gum (Eucalyptus viminalis), Kūmarahou (Pomaderris kumeraho), Rimu (Dacrydium cupressinum) and Silver Beech (Lophozonia menziesii). Our experimentally derived ranking was strongly correlated with expert opinion, lending support to both methods. Our results are useful to ecologists seeking to understand how fires have and will influence NZ’s ecosystems, and for fire managers identifying high-risk landscapes, and low flammability species for ‘green firebreaks’.

Implications of fires on carbon budgets in Andean cloud montane forest: The importance of peat soils and tree resprouting

Fire in tropical montane cloud forests (TMCFs) is not as rare as once believed. Andean TMCFs sit immediately below highly flammable, high-altitude grasslands (Puna/Páramo) that suffer from recurrent anthropogenic fire. This treeline is a zone of climatic tension where substantial future warming is likely to force upward tree migrations, while increased fire presence and fire impacts are likely to force it downwards. TMCFs contain large carbon stocks in their peat soils and their loss through fire is a currently unaccounted for regional source of CO 2. This study, conducted in the southern Peruvian Andes (>2800 m), documents differences in live tree biomass, fine root biomass, fallen and standing dead wood, and soil organic carbon in 4 paired-sample plots (burned versus control) following the severe ground fires that occurred during the 2005 Andean drought. Peat soils contributed the most to biomass burning emissions, with lower values corresponding to an 89% mean stock difference compared to the controls (mean ± SE) (54.1 ± 22.3 vs. 5.8 ± 5.3 MgC ha −1). Contrastingly, carbon stocks from live standing trees differed by a non-significant 37% lower value in the burned plots compared to the controls, largely compensated by vigorous resprouting (45.5 ± 17.4 vs. 69.2 ± 13.4 MgC ha −1). Both standing dead trees and fallen dead wood were significantly higher in the burned plots with a three-fold difference from the controls: dead Trees 45.2 ± 9.4 vs. 16.4 ± 4.4 MgC ha −1, and ca. a 2 fold difference for the fallen dead wood: 11.2 ± 5 vs. 6.7 ± 3.2 MgC ha −1 for the burned plots versus their controls. A preliminary estimate of the regional contribution of biomass burning emissions from Andean TMCFs for the period 2000–2008, resulted in mean carbon emission rates of 1.3 TgC yr −1 (max-min: 1.8–0.8 TgC yr −1). This value is in the same order of magnitude than South American annual fire emissions (300 TgC yr −1) suggesting the need for further research on Andean forest fires. On-going projects on the region are working on the promotion of landowner participation in TMCFs conservation through REDD+ mechanism. The heart of the proposed initiative is reforestation of degraded lands with green fire breaks enriched with economically valuable Andean plant species. The cultivation of these species may contribute to reduce deforestation pressure on the Amazonian cloud forest by providing an alternative income to local communities, at the same time that they prevent the spread of fire into Manu National Park and adjacent community-held forests, protecting forest and reducing CO 2 emissions.

Eficiência de um retardante de longa duração na redução da propagação do fogo

Os aceiros não naturais têm sido alternativa viável e de amplo uso no meio florestal, nas unidades de conservação e nas margens de rodovias para a redução na propagação do fogo. O seu principal objetivo é o de quebrar a continuidade do material combustível, compartimentalizando a área preferencialmente por grupo de material combustível homogêneo. Com o surgimento de novos produtos e de novos equipamentos de aplicação, os aceiros tradicionais têm sido substituídos por aceiros molhados, aceiros verdes ou aceiros químicos. Dentre as técnicas existentes, o presente trabalho teve por objetivo testar a melhor dosagem de um supressante de fogo, em uma área de pastagem formada pela gramínea Brachiaria decumbens. O supressante utilizado foi o phos-chek, um produto cujo princípio ativo é uma mistura de fosfato de amônio com sulfato de amônio na concentração de 0,134 kg/L. As dosagens aplicadas foram de 300, 600, 900 e 1.200 mL/m². A aplicação foi feita com bomba costal anti-incêndio, em parcelas de 2,0 x 5,0 m, com quatro repetições, utilizando-se o delineamento experimental de parcelas inteiramente ao acaso. Foram medidos o tempo gasto para o fogo queimar a parcela sem o produto; o tempo gasto para o fogo queimar a parcela com o produto; a distância que o fogo avançou na parcela com o produto; e a intensidade de queima, além do monitoramento do tempo, medindo-se a umidade relativa e a velocidade do vento em períodos de uma hora. A linha de fogo demorou cerca de 25 vezes mais tempo para queimar dentro da parcela com o produto, na dosagem de 1.200 mL/m², que na parte sem o produto. O fogo queimou toda a parcela na dosagem de 300 mL/m², mas o tempo de queima na parte com o produto foi maior que na sem produto. O phos-chek altera a reação da combustão, retardando o processo de queima e, quanto maior a dosagem, maior o efeito na inibição da reação. A melhor dosagem foi a de 1.200 mL/m², mas deve-se estudar o efeito de dosagens entre 900 e 1.200 mL/m², para melhorar a relação custo/benefício do uso desse produto.