ABSTRACT The paper investigates the predilection of Russian literature of the 1860s towards a critical representation of social reality, focusing on criticism aimed at the Russian Orthodox clergy. The author analyzes two novels written in the middle of the decade – Livanov (1864) by Mikhail Osokin and Na pogoste (At the churchyard, 1865) by Nikolai Blagoveshchenskii – to demonstrate both the objects of criticism and the literary devices used for this purpose. The analysis allows her to detect differences between two variants of criticism and place them within the literary and ecclesio-social context of the second half of the nineteenth century. She observes that a critical approach was characteristic of both journalists and writers who were deeply concerned about the state of the Church and were striving to revive it, and of those wishing to radically destroy the past. While the objects of their criticism were mainly identical, their literary texts differ in the way they employ plot, characterization, and stylistic devices to convey diverse ideological messages.
Read full abstract