Reviewed by: Chasing Automation: The Politics of Technology and Jobs from the Roaring Twenties to the Great Society by Jerry Prout G. Pascal Zachary (bio) Chasing Automation: The Politics of Technology and Jobs from the Roaring Twenties to the Great Society By Jerry Prout. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2022. Pp. 275. Jerry Prout provides a valuable account of the policy debates and political tensions over technological unemployment from the 1920s to the 1960s. His subject is automation, and his detailed and nuanced study fills a gap in the literature about the politics and policy of labor, the workplace, and technological change in the twentieth century. Prout's aim is clear: people struggle with the "sheer unpredictability of technological progress," which turns "anticipating the next wave of job-eliminating machines" into a "formidable challenge" (p. 3). Although the forces Prout examines are global, his study makes only a single reference to important scholarship by the late David Noble and Amy Bix, whose Inventing Ourselves Out of Jobs? has widely been viewed as the standard work since its publication in 2000. Prout's narrow focus on U.S. politics and policy, chiefly at the federal level, limits the ability of Chasing Automation to present a nuanced sense of social and economic factors, especially with regard to the documented motives of large employers who embraced automation as much for control as productivity. Prout also studies only the U.S. experience of the global automation movement and maintains a sharp focus on the fitful efforts by successive presidential administrations—from Hoover to Johnson—and members of Congress to face the perils to workers of rapid innovation. These perils were keenly felt during the Depression of the 1930s and surfaced again in the 1950s and 1960s during a wave of automation that included the first spread of computers and digital networks. In Chasing Automation, Prout aims to explain the shifting politics arising from "worries about unemployment" and "the role that machines were playing in causing it" (p. 5). Prout presents two contending perspectives in the debates over the effects of automation on labor: those who argue that innovation will harm workers through eliminating entire classes of jobs (from those operating elevators to telephone switches), and those who insist optimistically that over time technological change will yield a net gain in employment. One side, "the most alarmed technophobes," predicted "a dystopian future with increasing joblessness," while their opponents, whom Prout describes as "ebullient technophiles," envisioned a future "where workers were not only fully employed but freed from drudgery." Prout ends his narrative in the 1960s, but the debates he thoroughly documents remain alive for Americans to this day, and he admits that there might be an "inability to ever entirely resolve" them (p. 10). Much of Chasing Automation recounts attempts in the 1930s and the 1960s to assist workers in coping with automation. Sharp divisions over the extent of the problem existed in both periods. In the 1930s, concerns [End Page 640] ran so high that one member of Congress advocated "taxing machines" to "slow the pace" of technological unemployment (pp. 52–53). Advocates for labor-saving devices, meanwhile, "either deny the existence of technological unemployment or regard it as of minor importance" (p. 54). In the mid-1960s, a major study of automation was undertaken by the federal government. The so-called Automation Commission, now long forgotten, receives extensive treatment, with Prout recounting internal debates among the best and the brightest who were chosen as members and well documenting how tensions between the promise and peril of innovation limited policy initiatives. Liberal "visionaries" driven by a certain fatalism, Prout reports, proposed a "guaranteed income" to ease the pain of too few jobs and to break the link between jobs and income (p. 149). In early 1965, Prout writes, "the commission seemed to represent the last best hope of realizing the liberal-labor vision of a more planned response to the growing onslaught of computerized operations." Although he expresses admiration for the commission, Prout concedes that its final report "received very limited press, and what few accounts there were ranged from indifferently informative to actively critical" (p. 203). In closing, Prout cautions against the "expectation...