Graphene Family Nanomaterials Research Articles

Comparative evaluation of the effect of 2% graphene oxide and 5% hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in isolation and in combination on micro tensile bond strength of 5th generation adhesive

Background Graphene is the thinnest, strongest, and stiffest imaginable material. The biocompatible property of graphene oxide can initiate and facilitate cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation of periodontal ligament, osteogenic, and oral epithelial cells. Furthermore, the antibiofilm and anti-adhesion properties of graphene oxide in the prevention of dental biofilm infections, dental caries, and dental erosion as well as for implant surface modification and as an anti-quorum sensing agent. Composites are the most often utilized materials for restoration in the field of dentistry due to adhesive resins' improved mechanical and cosmetic properties. To safeguard the dentin and prevent dental cavities, dentin adhesives are utilized to affix hydrophobic resin composites to hydrophilic dentin tissue. Materials and Method Dental adhesives have a harder time adhering to dentin because it contains more water and is less mineralized than enamel. This makes the method more sensitive. Result As a result, it was chosen to assess and contrast the impact of 5% Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and 2% Graphene oxide nanoparticles, both separately and together, on the Micro tensile bond strength of 5th generation adhesive. Conclusion Graphene oxide is the most versatile form of Graphite in structural and functional configuration. Graphene oxide possesses extraordinary physical, chemical, optical, electrical and mechanical properties. Among the graphene family nanomaterials, the reduced form of Graphite adding the oxygenated functional group to the structure increases the surface area and therefore exhibits enviable excellent interaction ability with metal and ions as well as organic species. Graphene oxide in dentistry has provided outstanding results in antimicrobial action, regenerative dentistry, bone tissue engineering, drug delivery, physicochemical properties, enhancement of dental biomaterials and oral cancer treatment.

Comparative evaluation of the effect of 2% graphene oxide and 5% hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in isolation and in combination on micro tensile bond strength of 5th generation adhesive

Graphene is the thinnest, strongest, and stiffest imaginable material. The biocompatible property of graphene oxide can initiate and facilitate cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation of periodontal ligament, osteogenic, and oral epithelial cells. Furthermore, the antibiofilm and anti-adhesion properties of graphene oxide in the prevention of dental biofilm infections, dental caries, and dental erosion as well as for implant surface modification and as an anti-quorum sensing agent. Composites are the most often utilized materials for restoration in the field of dentistry due to adhesive resins' improved mechanical and cosmetic properties. To safeguard the dentin and prevent dental cavities, dentin adhesives are utilized to affix hydrophobic resin composites to hydrophilic dentin tissue. Dental adhesives have a harder time adhering to dentin because it contains more water and is less mineralized than enamel. This makes the method more sensitive. As a result, it was chosen to assess and contrast the impact of 5% Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and 2% Graphene oxide nanoparticles, both separately and together, on the Micro tensile bond strength of 5th generation adhesive. Graphene oxide is the most versatile form of Graphite in structural and functional configuration. Graphene oxide possesses extraordinary physical, chemical, optical, electrical and mechanical properties. Among the graphene family nanomaterials, the reduced form of Graphite adding the oxygenated functional group to the structure increases the surface area and therefore exhibits enviable excellent interaction ability with metal and ions as well as organic species. Graphene oxide in dentistry has provided outstanding results in antimicrobial action, regenerative dentistry, bone tissue engineering, drug delivery, physicochemical properties, enhancement of dental biomaterials and oral cancer treatment.

EPS-corona formation on graphene family nanomaterials (GO, rGO and graphene) and its role in mitigating their toxic effects in the marine alga Chlorella sp.

GFNs have widespread applications but can harm marine systems due to excessive use and improper disposal. Algae-secreted EPS can mitigate nanomaterial harm, but their impact on GFN toxicity is understudied. Hence, in the present study, we investigated the toxicity of three GFNs, graphene oxide (GO), reduced graphene oxide (rGO), and graphene, in pristine and EPS-adsorbed forms in the marine alga Chlorella sp. At an environmentally relevant concentration of 1 mgL−1, all three GFNs induced considerable oxidative stress and impeded growth and photosynthetic activity of the algae. The order of the toxic potential followed GO > rGO > graphene. The various facets of adsorption of EPS (1:1 mixture of loosely bound, and tightly bound EPS) on GFNs were investigated through microscopy, surface chemical analyses, fluorescence quenching studies, and isotherm and kinetics studies. Amongst the pristine GFNs treated with algal cells, GO was found to exert the maximum negative effects on algal growth. Upon adsorption of EPS over the GFNs, a significant decline in growth inhibition was observed compared to the respective pristine forms which strongly correlated with reduced oxidative stress and enhanced photosynthetic parameters in the cells. The formation of a layer of eco-corona after interaction of GFNs with EPS possibly caused a barrier effect which in turn diminished their toxic potential. The findings from the present investigation offer valuable insights into the environmental toxicity of GFNs and show that the eco-corona formation may lessen the risk posed by these materials in the marine environment.

Graphene family nanomaterials as emerging sole layered nanomaterials for wastewater treatment: Recent developments, potential hazards, prevention and future prospects

Graphene family nanomaterials as emerging sole layered nanomaterials for wastewater treatment: Recent developments, potential hazards, prevention and future prospects

Comparative evaluation of the effect of 2% graphene oxide and 5% hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in isolation and in combination on micro tensile bond strength of 5th generation adhesive

Graphene is the thinnest, strongest and stiffest imaginable material. The biocompatible property of graphene oxide can initiate and facilitate cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation of periodontal ligament, osteogenic and oral epithelial cells. Furthermore, the antibiofilm and anti-adhesion properties of graphene oxide in prevention of dental biofilm infections, dental caries, dental erosion as well as for implant surface modification and as anti-quorum sensing agent. Composites are most often utilised materials for restoration in the field of dentistry due to adhesive resins' improved mechanical and cosmetic properties. To safeguard the dentin and prevent dental cavities, dentin adhesives are utilised to affix hydrophobic resin composites to hydrophilic dentin tissue. Dental adhesives have a harder time adhering to dentin because it contains more water and is less mineralized than enamel. This makes the method more sensitive. As a result, it was chosen to assess and contrast the impact of 5% Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and 2% Graphene oxide nanoparticles, both separately and together, on the Micro tensile bond strength of 5th generation adhesive. Graphene oxide is the most versatile form of Graphite in structural and functional configuration. Graphene oxide possess extraordinary physical, chemical, optical, electrical and mechanical properties. Among the graphene family nanomaterials, the reduced form of Graphite adding the oxygenated functional group to the structure increases the surface area and therefore exhibits enviable excellent interaction ability with metal and ions as well as organic species. Graphene oxide in dentistry has provided outstanding results in antimicrobial action, regenerative dentistry, bone tissue engineering, drug delivery, physicochemical property, enhancement of dental biomaterials and oral cancer treatment.

Potential Biomedical Limitations of Graphene Nanomaterials.

Graphene-family nanomaterials (GFNs) possess mechanical stiffness, optical properties, and biocompatibility making them promising materials for biomedical applications. However, to realize the potential of graphene in biomedicine, it must overcome several challenges that arise when it enters the body's circulatory system. Current research focuses on the development of tumor-targeting devices using graphene, but GFNs accumulated in different tissues and cells through different pathways, which can cause toxic reactions leading to cell apoptosis and body dysfunction when the accumulated amount exceeds a certain limit. In addition, as a foreign substance, graphene can induce complex inflammatory reactions with immune cells and inflammatory factors, potentially enhancing or impairing the body's immune function. This review discusses the biomedical applications of graphene, the effects of graphene materials on human immune function, and the biotoxicity of graphene materials.

Pulmonary hazard identifications of Graphene family nanomaterials: Adverse outcome pathways framework based on toxicity mechanisms.

Graphene-family nanomaterials (GFNs) are revolutionary new nanomaterials that have attracted significant attention in the field of nanomaterials, but the ensuing problems lie in the potential threats to public health and the ecosystem caused by these nanomaterials. From the perspective of GFN-related health risk assessments, this study reviews the current status of GFN-induced pathological lung events with a focus on the damage caused to different biological moieties (molecular, cellular, tissue, and organ) and the mechanistic relationships between different toxic endpoints. These multiple sites of damage were matched with existing adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) in an online knowledge base to obtain available molecular initiation events (MIEs), key events (KEs), and adverse outcomes (AOs). Among them, the MIEs were discussed in combination with the structure-activity relationship due to the correlation between toxicity and physical and chemical properties of GFNs. Based on the collection of information regarding MIEs, Kes, and AOs in addition to upstream and downstream causal extrapolation, the AOP framework for GFN-induced pulmonary toxicity was developed, highlighting the possible mechanisms of GFN-induced lung damage. This review intended to combine AOP with classic toxicological methods with a view to rapidly and accurately establishing a nanotoxicology infrastructure so as to contribute to public health risk assessment strategies through iteration from and animal models up to the population level.

Is graphene the rock upon which new era continuous glucose monitors could be built?

Diabetes mellitus' (DM) prevalence worldwide is estimated to be around 10% and is expected to rise over the next decades. Monitoring blood glucose levels aims to determine whether glucose targets are met to minimize the risk for the development of symptoms related to high or low blood sugar and avoid long-term diabetes complications. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGMs) systems emerged almost two decades ago and have revolutionized the way diabetes is managed. Especially in Type 1 DM, the combination of a CGM with an insulin pump (known as a closed-loop system or artificial pancreas) allows an autonomous regulation of patients' insulin with minimal intervention from the user. However, there is still an unmet need for high accuracy, precision and repeatability of CGMs. Graphene was isolated in 2004 and found immediately fertile ground in various biomedical applications and devices due to its unique combination of properties including its high electrical conductivity. In the last decade, various graphene family nanomaterials have been exploited for the development of enzymatic and non-enzymatic biosensors to determine glucose in biological fluids, such as blood, sweat, and so on. Although great progress has been achieved in the field, several issues need to be addressed for graphene sensors to become a predominant material in the new era of CGMs.

Tackling COVID-19 Using Antiviral Nanocoating's-Recent Progress and Future Challenges.

In the current situation of the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there is a worldwide demand for the protection of regular handling surfaces from viral transmission to restrict the spread of COVID-19 infection. To tackle this challenge, researchers and scientists are continuously working on novel antiviral nanocoatings to make various substrates capable of arresting the spread of such pathogens. These nanocoatings systems include metal/metal oxide nanoparticles, electrospun antiviral polymer nanofibers, antiviral polymer nanoparticles, graphene family nanomaterials, and etched nanostructures. The antiviral mechanism of these systems involves depletion of the spike glycoprotein that anchors to surfaces by the nanocoating and makes the spike glycoprotein and viral nucleotides inactive; however, the nature of the interaction between the spike proteins and virus depends on the type of nanostructure and a surface charge over the coating surface. In this article, the current scenario of COVID-19 and how it can be tackled using antiviral nanocoatings from the further transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), along with their different mode of action, are discussed. Additionally, it isalso highlighted different types of nanocoatings developed for various substrates to encounter transmission of SARS-CoV-2, future research areas along with the current challenges related to it, and how these challenges can be resolved.

Graphene Family Nanomaterials for Stem Cell Neurogenic Differentiation and Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.

Stem cells play a critical role in peripheral nerve regeneration. Nerve scaffolds fabricated by specific materials can help induce the neurogenic differentiation of stem cells. Therefore, it is a potential strategy to enhance therapeutic efficiency. Graphene family nanomaterials are widely applied in repairing peripheral nerves. However, the mechanism underlying the pro-regeneration effects remains elusive. In this review, we first discuss the properties of graphene family nanomaterials, including monolayer and multilayer graphene, few-layer graphene, graphene oxide, reduced graphene oxide, and graphene quantum dots. We also introduce their applications in regulating stem cell differentiation. Then, we review the potential mechanisms of the neurogenic differentiation of stem cells facilitated by the materials. Finally, we discuss the existing challenges in this field to advance the development of nerve biomaterials.

The design, construction and application of graphene family composite nanocoating on dental metal surface.

Enhancement of the biological and mechanical properties of dental metals is important for accommodation with therapeutic schemes in different stomatological disciplines. Nanocoatings based on graphene family nanomaterials (GFNs) improve the topological structure and physicochemical properties of metal surfaces, endowing them with new properties while maintaining inherent mechanical properties. Nano-composite coatings, composed of GFNs with one or more type of polymer, metal, oxide, and inorganic nonmetallic compound, offer more matching modification schemes to meet multifunctional oral treatment requirements (e.g., anti-bacterial and anti-corrosive activity, osteogenesis and angiogenesis). This review describes recent progress in the development of GFN composite nanocoatings for the modification of dental metals, focus on biological effects in clinical settings. Underlying molecular mechanisms, critical modification schemes, and technical innovation in preparation methods are also discussed. The key parameters of GFN composite nanocoating surface modification are summarized according to effects on cellular responses and antibacterial activity. This review provides a theoretical reference for the optimization of the biological effects and application of GFN composite nanocoatings for dental metals, and the promotion of the environmentally friendly large-scale production of high-quality multifunctional GFN-based nanocoatings in the field of oral science.

Hydrophilic montmorillonite in tailoring the structure and selectivity of polyamide membrane

2D nanomaterials have been extensively studied for their superiority in desalination applications. For instance, the incorporation of Graphene-Family nanomaterials has been reported to enhance membrane separation performance significantly, yet the other important low-cost 2D nanomaterial, montmorillonite (MMT), is less studied. For the first time, we systematically studied the formation and performance of polyamide membranes with the modification of exfoliated MMT. The exfoliated MMT has overcome the classical membrane permeability-selectivity trade-off attributed to its uniformity, excellent dispersion and compatibility with monomer m-phenylenediamine (MPD). The effects of MMT charges on the perm-selectivity of resultant TFN membranes were also studied symmetrically. MMT can tailor the surface morphology, roughness, hydrophilicity, and crosslink density of polyamide due to tunable charges and ionic strength. In addition, it was found that MMT exhibited a positive effect on the chlorine resistance of the membrane. Taken together, our work provides fundamental insights into the formation and transport mechanisms in thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes.

Differential modulation of endothelial cytoplasmic protrusions after exposure to graphene-family nanomaterials

Engineered nanomaterials offer the benefit of having systematically tunable physicochemical characteristics (e.g., size, dimensionality, and surface chemistry) that highly dictate the biological activity of a material. Among the most promising engineered nanomaterials to date are graphene-family nanomaterials (GFNs), which are 2-D nanomaterials (2DNMs) with unique electrical and mechanical properties. Beyond engineering new nanomaterial properties, employing safety-by-design through considering the consequences of cell-material interactions is essential for exploring their applicability in the biomedical realm. In this study, we asked the effect of GFNs on the endothelial barrier function and cellular architecture of vascular endothelial cells. Using micropatterned cell pairs as a reductionist in vitro model of the endothelium, the progression of cytoskeletal reorganization as a function of GFN surface chemistry and time was quantitatively monitored. Here, we show that the surface oxidation of GFNs (graphene, reduced graphene oxide, partially reduced graphene oxide, and graphene oxide) differentially affect the endothelial barrier at multiple scales; from the biochemical pathways that influence the development of cellular protrusions to endothelial barrier integrity. More oxidized GFNs induce higher endothelial permeability and the increased formation of cytoplasmic protrusions such as filopodia. We found that these changes in cytoskeletal organization, along with barrier function, can be potentiated by the effect of GFNs on the Rho/Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) pathway. Specifically, GFNs with higher surface oxidation elicit stronger ROCK2 inhibitory behavior as compared to pristine graphene sheets. Overall, findings from these studies offer a new perspective towards systematically controlling the surface-dependent effects of GFNs on cytoskeletal organization via ROCK2 inhibition, providing insight for implementing safety-by-design principles in GFN manufacturing towards their targeted biomedical applications.

The Effects of Graphene-Family Nanomaterials on Plant Growth: A Review.

Numerous reports of graphene-family nanomaterials (GFNs) promoting plant growth have opened up a wide range of promising potential applications in agroforestry. However, several toxicity studies have raised growing concerns about the biosafety of GFNs. Although these studies have provided clues about the role of GFNs from different perspectives (such as plant physiology, biochemistry, cytology, and molecular biology), the mechanisms by which GFNs affect plant growth remain poorly understood. In particular, a systematic collection of data regarding differentially expressed genes in response to GFN treatment has not been conducted. We summarize here the fate and biological effects of GFNs in plants. We propose that soil environments may be conducive to the positive effects of GFNs but may be detrimental to the absorption of GFNs. Alterations in plant physiology, biochemistry, cytological structure, and gene expression in response to GFN treatment are discussed. Coincidentally, many changes from the morphological to biochemical scales, which are caused by GFNs treatment, such as affecting root growth, disrupting cell membrane structure, and altering antioxidant systems and hormone concentrations, can all be mapped to gene expression level. This review provides a comprehensive understanding of the effects of GFNs on plant growth to promote their safe and efficient use.

The sensitive energy band structure and the spiral current in helical graphenes

We theoretically investigate the electronic properties in helical graphenes of both the armchair and the zigzag edge types. The energy band structures, the quantum conductances and the microscopic currents are calculated by the tight-binding and Green’s function methods. The results indicate that the helical graphenes behave significantly different, but regular in many cases, physical characteristics which sensitively depend on the sizes and the edge types. With the width increasing, the zigzag-edge helical graphenes become metal quickly, while the armchair-edge ones transform alternately between semiconductors and metals and the bandgaps experience obviously periodic changes. The possible edge states can also be distinguished in the quantum conductances along the helical direction. The results of current distributions show that there are obvious current pathways at lower energies and that the presence of edge states accompanies with an inner ring current channel. This is a method to produce helical currents in the nanometer scale. The study of this kind of graphenes not only extends the knowledge of graphene-family nanomaterials, but also paves the way for realizing the nano-scale helical circuits with the prospective application in carbon-based integrated circuits such as inductors.

Principles and Biomedical Application of Graphene Family Nanomaterials.

Two-dimensional graphene family nanomaterials (GFNs) are extensively studied by the researchers for their quantum size effect, large surface area, numerous reactive functional sites, and biocompatibility. The hybrid materials of GFNs exhibit an increased level of mechanical strength, optical, electronic, and catalytic activity due to their incorporation. The application of GFNs in the energy, environment, electric and electronic, personal care, and health sectors is abundant, which is not only by their unique physicochemical properties but also by their ease and large production by various synthetic approaches and economically inexpensiveness. Their general biomedical applications include bioimaging, biosensing, drug delivery, tissue engineering, killing the microbes, and demolishing the cancer tumor. The first chapter of this book describes definitions, synthetic methods, unique properties, and biomedical applications of GFNs, including graphene, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide.

Graphene for Nanobiosensors and Nanobiochips.

Graphene family nanomaterials have interesting electronic structures which determine their electrical, optical, and mechanical properties. Especially, their unique chemical properties enable interactions with biological substances and chemical reagents, and the interactions have further an influence on the observable properties of the graphene family nanomaterials. Such aspects render graphene family nanomaterials versatile for various types of biosensing as a target recognition unit and a recognition-to-signal transduction unit. In this chapter, we look over the recent progress on the graphene-based biosensors, which is categorized in terms of (1) the role of graphene family nanomaterials (target recognition, signal transduction), (2) the sensing mechanisms and modes (electrochemical, electrical, fluorescent, Raman scattering), and (3) the formats of sensing devices (paper, lab-on-a-chip, wearable devices).

Reflections and Outlook on Multifaceted Biomedical Applications of Graphene.

Two-dimensional nanomaterials have been widely explored by researchers due to their nanosized thickness and quantum size effect. They were layered double hydroxides, transition metal dichalcogenides, transition metal oxides, and synthetic silicate clays. Among the 2D nanomaterials, graphene and their derivatives were investigated extensively at first as they exhibited exceptional conductivity and a zero-band gap semimetal nature. Though graphene family nanomaterials (GFNs) were utilized for several physicochemical applications, including electronic, electric, mechanic, photonic, magnetic, and catalytic devices, their biomedical applications are still meritorious. Biosensor, bioimaging, drug delivery, tumor ablation, and tissue regeneration are some of them. The outlook of the present book chapters encompasses the preparation of GFNs, physicochemical properties, biomedical applications, biosafety, and their future directions.

Differential Toxicity of Graphene Family Nanomaterials Concerning Morphology.

Graphene family nanomaterials (GFNs) are well-known carbonaceous materials, which find application in several fields like optoelectronics, photocatalysis, nanomedicine, and tissue regeneration. Despite possessing many advantages in biomedical applications, GFNs exhibited toxicity depending on various parameters including dosage, size, exposure time, and kinds of administration. GFNS are majorly classified into nanosheets, quantum dots, nanoplatelets, and nanoribbons based on morphology. Understanding the toxic effects of GFNs would provide new suggestions as to how the materials can be utilized effectively. Hence, we are summarizing here some of the recent findings in cellular and animal level toxicity studies of GFNs on the perspective of their different morphologies. Notwithstanding, we highlight progress, challenges, and new toxicological approaches to ensure biosafety of GFNs for future directions.

Comparative evaluation of the mechanisms of toxicity of graphene oxide and graphene oxide quantum dots to blue-green algae Microcystis aeruginosa in the aquatic environment

Due to the diverse applications, graphene-family nanomaterials (GFNs) have a high probability of release into the aquatic system, potentially posing risks to the aquatic environment. The acute effects on single-celled Microcystis aeruginosa by graphene oxide (GO) or graphene oxide quantum dots (GOQDs) were compared in the present study. GOQDs dispersed more effectively in water than GO at all pH values tested. The 96-hour median effective concentration (EC50) of GO and GOQDs were determined to be 49.32 and 22.46 mg/L, respectively. Both GO and GOQDs were internalized by heteroagglomeration and envelopment processes, with GOQDs inducing stronger upregulation of cell permeability, plasmolysis and lipid bodies than GO. Cracking of thylakoid layers, disappearance of nucleoid, and disintegration of cell infrastructure were observed at higher concentrations. In comparison to GO, GOQDs induced higher reactive oxygen species (ROS) and malondialdehyde (MDA) and disrupted antioxidant enzymes, leading to the inhibition of cellular contents such as chlorophyll a and proteins. Furthermore, both GO and GOQDs adsorbed nutrients from the algal medium, resulting in nutrient depletion-induced indirect toxicity, with GOQDs depleting more nutrients than GO. The current study provides new understanding of nanotoxicity of GO and GOQD and aids in the potential risks of nanomaterials in aquatic environments.