T “Grain for Green Program” (GGP) is the largest and most acclaimed ecological program since the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949. The program is intended to increase vegetation cover, combat land desertification, and improve the eco-environment. The Loess Plateau is experiencing the most extensive soil erosion in China and is the top-priority area for implementation of the GGP. Based on rigorous scientific research, Loess Plateau croplands that have a slope greater than 15° are the target areas for the GGP and include an area of 2.52 million ha. Based on a per capita arable land demand of 1.5 mu (0.1 ha), the potential area for GGP implementation is limited to 2.36 million ha. However, 4.83 million ha of cropland have been converted to forest and grassland on the Loess Plateau between 2000 and 2008, which is double the limitation area for GGP. Although the GGP on the Loess Plateau has been met with a chorus of praise for its successes, which include increased vegetation cover, decreased soil erosion, and an improved eco-environment, the program has also resulted in socioeconomic problems, such as a substantial decrease in farmland and a critical grain shortage. Currently, balancing the population’s needs, grain supply needs, and environmental needs requires greater consideration. In recent years, Chinese scientists and government officials have noticed problems induced by the large-scale implementation of the GGP on the Loess Plateau. Shaanxi province, a province in northern China that includes 12.68% of the Loess Plateau area, developed a program titled “Plan for filling gullies to create farmland on the Loess Plateau” in 2010. The project aims to create 4.0 million ha of farmland in gully channels between 2011 and 2020, and the total investment has reached 30 billion Renminbi. Currently, the project is performing experiments in Yan’an city, the so-called Red Capital of China. Briefly, the approach of filling gullies to create farmland involves removing soil from the surrounding hills and using this material to fill gully channels. The flat fields created in the channels are used for cultivation and ultimately increase the farmland area within the Loess Plateau. Although the gully filling project has received support from the Chinese central government and recently Liu et al. analyzed its benefits, the project is controversial among Chinese geological, ecological, and environmental scientists. The focus of this controversy includes four aspects. First, the feasibility of the gully filling project has been questioned. The gullies of the Loess Plateau are generally deep, with depths of 100−300 m; filling soils in the deep channels and building dams to retain the sediments require huge amount of work, and therefore many geo-engineering scientists doubt the feasibility of the project construction. Second, it is possible that gully filling will lead to more significant disasters. The Loess Plateau is formed by Quaternary loessial dust deposits that are poorly structured and highly susceptible to erosion by water; thus, gully filling can increase the frequency of significant disasters, such as dam breaks and landslides. Third, gully filling projects require significant investments, and it is unclear whether the investment for filling gullies can be balanced by the income from farming the cropland created by the project. Fourth, it has been questioned whether gully filling will damage the environment and result in more extensive soil erosion; the filling of gullies requires the excavation of soil from the surrounding hills and will likely damage the vegetation and stability of hill slopes. I believe that gully filling to create farmland on the Loess Plateau is a double-edged sword. The Loess Plateau is now facing the dilemma of GGP expansion and grain shortage. The filling of gullies to create farmland might serve as an important measure to solve certain problems. However, gully filling is likely to create many types of environmental problems, such as geological disasters, ecosystem disruption, and soil erosion. At present, we must find a balance between the positive and negative impacts, eliminate the negative effects as much as possible, and evaluate case studies to improve the gully filling project.
Read full abstract