Graft Fixation Techniques Research Articles

The Arthroscopically Guided Bristow-Latarjet Procedure With Cortical Button Fixation: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-up

Background: Despite improved visualization, the use of arthroscopic surgery to perform the Latarjet procedure has not decreased the rates of complications and glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) in the long term. Many of the reported complications are related to the use of screws for bone block fixation with freehand drilling. Purpose: To evaluate the long-term (at a minimum 10-year follow-up) clinical and radiological outcomes of the arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet procedure using a posterior guided drilling technique and suture button for coracoid bone graft fixation. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent the arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet procedure with suture button fixation between 2011 and 2013 were reviewed by 2 independent evaluators. Complications and revision surgery were recorded, and we evaluated patient-reported outcomes including subjective scores, recurrence of shoulder instability (dislocation or subluxation), range of motion limitations, and return to sports. Patients had radiographs taken at least 10 years after surgery to assess glenohumeral OA according to the Samilson-Prieto classification system and computed tomography scans to assess bone block positioning and healing. Results: A total of 65 consecutive patients (68 shoulders) with a mean follow-up of 135 months (range, 120-156 months) were included. The mean age at the time of surgery was 25 ± 8 years; 7 patients had previous failed Bankart repair. At follow-up, 94% (64/68) of the shoulders had no recurrence of instability. The 4 cases of instability recurrence were traumatic and occurred at 3 weeks (a fall), 4 months, 2 years, and 7 years after surgery. No hardware failures, coracoid fractures, or neurological complications were observed. Overall, 61 patients (94%) were still participating in sports, with 44 (68%) at the same or higher level. Range of motion showed nonsignificant restrictions in external rotation with the arm at the side (7° ± 9°) and with the arm at 90° of abduction (9° ± 10°) compared with the contralateral side. Additionally, 11 shoulders (16%) had some residual anterior apprehension on clinical examination. At last follow-up, 77% (47/61) of the shoulders had no OA development or progression. Previous failed Bankart repair was a risk factor for the development of OA. Patients with OA had significantly lower Subjective Shoulder Value scores (79% vs 91%, respectively; P = .01) and decreased external rotation with the arm at the side (40° vs 65°, respectively; P = .001) compared with patients with no or little OA. Conclusion: The arthroscopically guided Bristow-Latarjet procedure with suture button fixation is a safe and durable surgical treatment method for recurrent anterior shoulder instability, allowing a high rate of return to sports without significant motion restrictions and no or little OA in the long term.

Whipstitch and Locking Stitch Show Equivalent Elongation and Load to Failure Across 3 Suture Systems in a Biomechanical Model of Quadriceps Tendon Grafts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of quadriceps tendon (QT) graft stitch methods using three different suture systems for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. MethodsA total of 48 QTs were harvested from cadaveric knee specimens (age: 73 ± 7 years; range 66-86 years). Samples were randomly divided into three groups where different suture needle systems were used to create two stitch methods: whip stitch (WS) and locking stitch (LS). Surgeons performed each technique to five stitches, each 0.5cm apart. Stitching time was recorded. Samples were pre-conditioned then underwent cyclic loading, followed by load-to-failure. Stiffness (N/mm), ultimate failure load (N), peak-to-peak displacement (mm), elongation (mm), and failure displacement (mm) were recorded. ResultsWS and LS were equivalent across stiffness, ultimate load and peak to peak displacement within Groups 2 and 3. In Group 1, the LS was stiffer than the WS, however the WS achieved a higher ultimate load. For all Groups, the LS achieved lower elongation and failure displacement than the WS, with significant differences in Group 1 and 2. Within each stitching method, equivalence was determined for total elongation and ultimate failure load for all three suture system groups. For WS samples, Group 1 all failed from suture breakage, and both Groups 2 and 3 had instances of failure from suture pull through. All LS samples failed from suture breakage. ConclusionBoth LS and WS provide adequate mechanical properties in each of the three suture systems. Differences in performance do exist; however, each method shows equivalent total elongation and ultimate failure load for all three suture systems. LS may be preferred versus WS due to lower mean elongation and failure displacement. Clinical RelevanceThere is an increased use of a quadriceps tendon (QT) grafts in ACL reconstruction. However, there has been a limited number of studies comparing various stitching methods and optimizing techniques for QT graft fixation. This study may provide important information to surgeons about which suture techniques have better biomechanical profiles.

Lateral femoral tunnel preparation and graft fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-A discussion.

This article provides a discussion and commentary around the recent advances in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), with a focus on the aspects of lateral femoral tunnel preparation and graft fixation techniques. The paper explores and comments on a recently published review by Dai et al, titled "Research progress on preparation of lateral femoral tunnel and graft fixation in ACLR", while providing insight into its relevance within the field of ACLR, and recommendations for future research.

The Periosteum–Patellar Tendon–Bone Autograft for Anatomic, Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Press-Fit Tibial Fixation

Optimal graft choice and fixation technique are still ongoing topics of debate for primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Interference screws are frequently used as graft fixation devices but can sometimes lead to tunnel widening, cyst formation, chronic inflammation, screw breakage, and persistent pain. Tibial tunnel widening is of special concern because it is often associated with graft failure. This technical note introduces a graft technique with a periosteum–patellar tendon–bone autograft and a press-fit tibial fixation approach that could be a viable option for secure anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction while offering the possibility of a quicker postoperative recovery, less pain, and a quicker return to everyday activities.

Revision Patellar Tendon Reconstruction Using Hamstring Tendon Autograft

Background: Patellar tendon ruptures presenting in a chronic setting are rare events that impose technical surgical challenges due to proximal retraction of the patella, quadriceps muscle atrophy and contracture, and peripatellar adhesions. Various reconstruction techniques have been described using different grafts and fixation methods; however, there is a paucity of reported outcomes and there is no consensus on standard of care. Indications: The patient is a 36-year-old man who presented with a failed patellar tendon reconstruction 14 months after his initial surgery (performed 1 year after the initial injury) with functional weakness and loss of extension. The patient was indicated for a revision patellar tendon reconstruction due to persistent functional limitations. Technique Description: The revision patellar tendon reconstruction was performed with gracilis and semitendinosus tendon autografts harvested from the ipsilateral limb. Hardware was removed from the initial graft tunnels in the tibial tubercle and patella. Patellar height was estimated using fluoroscopic measurement of the contralateral patellar tendon length. The graft is first passed through the patellar tunnel, and the individual limbs of the graft are then both placed through the tibial tubercle tunnel. A sternal wire in a figure-of-eight configuration was used to progressively distalize the patella to match the native patellar height, and the graft was then tensioned and secured together. Results: The patient regained full range of motion at 2-year follow-up and was able to return to work and activities without functional limitations. Recent case series also using ipsilateral hamstring tendon autograft for chronic patellar tendon reconstruction report improved patient outcome scores, normal Insall-Salvati index, improved quadriceps strength, and high levels of patient satisfaction. Discussion/Conclusion: Chronic patellar tendon ruptures are technically challenging to treat, especially in the context of revision of a failed reconstruction. The technique presented in this video may aid orthopaedic surgeons in treating this rare but debilitating injury. Given the lack of high-quality evidence, future studies are needed to explore graft choices, graft fixation techniques, and postoperative protocols. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Triple Hybrid Tibial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Fixation

Optimal graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is critical. Several direct and indirect methods of graft fixation exist, each with advantages and disadvantages. This Technical Note describes a tibial hybrid anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation technique combining direct and indirect fixation methods, including autologous bone augmentation of the drill tunnel using cancellous bone fragments.

Outcomes of scapulothoracic fusion in patients with facioscapulohumeral dystrophy: a comparison of allograft versus autograft bone grafting.

Scapulothoracic (ST) fusion for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is an established treatment that corrects scapular instability, although it has high reported complication rates. The purpose of our study was to characterize the outcomes of ST fusion for FSHD in a large patient cohort and compare the outcomes based on bone graft type and fixation technique. Our hypothesis was that union rates would not differ by bone graft type during ST fusion. A retrospective chart review was undertaken to identify patients who underwent ST fusion at multiple institutions performed by a single surgeon between 2013 and 2019 with minimum 2-year follow-up. Patient demographic characteristics, surgical technique, time to union, complications, and clinical outcomes including patient-reported outcome measures were recorded. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses including regression analyses were performed to compare preoperative and postoperative outcomes. A total of 50 patients with 54 ST fusions (bilateral in 4 patients) and an average follow-up period of 5.8 years (standard deviation, 1.6 years) were included for analysis. Active forward elevation (77° vs. 124°, P<.00001) and abduction (60° vs. 90°, P<.00001) both improved significantly after fusion. Average internal rotation after fusion was at spinal level L3-L4. The visual analog scale pain score (2.6 vs. 1.2, P<.00001), Subjective Shoulder Value score (33 vs. 76, P<.00001), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score (41.8 vs. 76.1, P<.00001) all improved significantly postoperatively. Of the shoulders, 50% (27 of 54) received treatment with cerclage wires and 50% (27 of 54) received treatment with Luque wires. Femoral head allograft was used in 53.7% of shoulders (29 of 54), whereas iliac crest autograft was used in 46.3% (25 of 54). Average radiographic time to healing was 11.1 weeks (standard deviation, 3.2 weeks), with no incidence of nonunion, and did not significantly differ by bone graft type (P=.26) or technique (P=.20). The complication rate was 24.1%, including seroma (n=3), superficial infection (n=2), transient neurologic injury (n=2), hemothorax (n=1), rib fracture (n=1), pneumothorax (n=1), and shortness of breath (n=1), although none requiring reoperation. There was no significant difference in the rate of postoperative complications when compared by surgical technique (P=.81) and bone graft type (P=.93). There were no independently predictive factors influencing the rate of postoperative complications by multivariate regression. Regression analysis showed that the postoperative ASES score was independently associated with the preoperative ASES score (P<.0001), use of iliac crest autograft (P<.011), and presence of complications (P<.043). Patients receiving ST fusion for FSHD demonstrate globally improved active motion and patient-reported outcome measures. Fusion construct or type of bone graft does not affect time to union or complication rates. Surgeons should be aware of a relatively high complication rate in the early postoperative period.

Acromion and Distal Clavicle Grafts for Arthroscopic Glenoid Reconstruction.

We intended to determine if an acromion or distal clavicle bone graft could restore large glenoid defects using two novel, screw-free graft fixation techniques. Twenty-four sawbone shoulder models were divided into four groups (n = 6 per group) according to fixation technique and bone graft: (1) modified buckle-down technique with clavicle graft, (2) modified buckle-down technique with acromion graft, (3) cross-link technique with acromion graft, (4) cross-link technique with clavicle graft. Testing was performed sequentially in (1) intact models, (2) after creation of a 30% by-width glenoid defect and (3) after repair. The shoulder joint was translated anteriorly, and glenohumeral contact pressures and load were measured to quantify the biomechanical stability. Maximum contact pressures were restored to 42-56% of intact glenoid using acromion and clavicle grafts with novel fixation techniques. Acromion grafts attained higher maximum contact pressures than clavicle grafts in all groups. Peak translational forces increased by 171-368% after all repairs. This controlled laboratory study on sawbone models found that both the acromion and distal clavicle are suitable autologous bone graft options for treating large anterior glenoid defects, having appropriate dimensions and contours for reconstructing the glenoid arc. The modified buckle-down and cross-link techniques are two graft fixation techniques that restore stability to the shoulder joint upon repairing a large glenoid defect and are advantageous in being screw-free and simple to execute.

Patellar dislocation recurrence after pediatric MPFL reconstruction: Bone tunnels and soft tissues versus suture anchors and interference screw

BackgroundSeveral Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) reconstruction techniques have been developed, and those with soft tissue fixation are often preferred in children because they allow the growth cartilage to be preserved. Nevertheless, the recurrence rate of patellar dislocation varies widely from one series to another, with no clear superiority of one technique in the pediatric setting. The objectives of this study were to compare the results of two tendon graft fixation techniques (tendon-tendon fixation and anchor-screw fixation) by analyzing: 1) the rate of patellar dislocation recurrence, 2) clinical outcomes, 3) tourniquet time and 4) complication rate. HypothesisThe two tendon graft fixation techniques used in MPFL reconstruction are equivalent in terms of the patellar dislocation recurrence rate. Patients and methodsThis is a retrospective comparative study including 57 patients with a median age of 14 years (12–15 years) who underwent MPFL reconstruction between 2016 and 2020. The tendon graft was fixed upon itself, after passing through a patellar tunnel (Group A: tendon-tendon fixation; n=29) or by two anchors and an interference screw (Group B: anchor-screw fixation; n=28). The preoperative radiographic data were comparable in the two groups: patellar height [A: 1.3 (interquartile range (IQR): 1.2–1.4) / B: 1.2 (IQR: 1–1.4) (p=0.21)], tibial tuberosity to trochlear groove (TTTG) distance [A: 16 (IQR: 13–19) / B: 13.5 (IQR: 11.5–18.8) (p=0.12)], patellar tilt [A: 25 (IQR: 20–35) / B: 24.5 (IQR: 21–32) (p=0.93)]. For each technique, the rate of patellar dislocation recurrence, clinical and functional results (Kujala score, Marx activity score, Lille patellofemoral score), complications (pain, stiffness, revision) were analyzed. In addition to MPFL repair, 13 patients (2 in Group A, 11 in Group B) underwent additional orthopedic procedures to enhance patellar stability. Resultsno patients were lost to follow-up and the median follow-up was 30 months (IQR: 20–38). The dislocation recurrence rate was higher in Group A, 6.9% (2/29) compared to none in Group B. The clinical results were comparable for the two groups with a Kujala score [A: 94 (IQR: 89–100) / B: 92 (IQR: 87.5–94.5) (p=0.12)]; Marx score [A: 10 (IQR: 7–11) / B: 9.5 (IQR: 7.5–12) (p=0.89)] and Lille patellofemoral score [A: 97 (IQR: 91–100) / B: 94 (IQR: 90–98) (p=0.21)]. The tourniquet time was shorter in Group A than in Group B, 61minutes (IQR: 52-71) versus 85minutes (IQR: 55-115) (p=0.024) excluding additional orthopedic procedures. The complication rate was 17.2% (5/29) in Group A (dislocation n=2, stiffness n=2, ATT (anterior tibial tuberosity) revision with screw removal n=1) and 10.7% (3/28) in B (pain n=1, ATT revision with screw removal n=2) (p=0.35). ConclusionClinically, anchor-screw fixation appears to reduce the risk of patellar dislocation recurrence but this could not be statistically tested. On the other hand, the two techniques are comparable in terms of the functional results. Level of evidenceIII; retrospective case-control study.

Graft Intra-Articular Remodeling and Bone Incorporation in ACL Reconstruction: The State of the Art and Clinical Implications.

The knee is one of the most frequently affected joints in sports trauma, and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and meniscal tears are the most common lesions. ACL reconstruction (ACLR) remains the treatment of choice for patients willing to return to their previous activity. There are different surgical techniques and different possible usable grafts. The graft used for ACLR surgery undergoes a bone incorporation process and an intra-articular remodelling named ligamentization until it reaches characteristics similar to the native ligament. After the first incorporation stage, the remodelling process is divided into an early stage that could last 4 weeks, a proliferative stage that lasts 4 to 12 weeks, and a final stage of ligamentization that could last over 1 year. The period of return to sport (RTS) after ACLR, which is becoming shorter and shorter, can be a high-risk period for athletes due to the risk of graft failure. This systematic review aims to define the phases of the ligamentization process considering graft type and fixation techniques, as well as the graft's anatomopathological and biomechanical characteristics, to evaluate a criterion-based rehab progression and maximize patient outcomes for an RTS respecting graft biology. The rehabilitative program has to promote and optimize the graft remodelling and incorporation processes; moreover, it has to accommodate physiological graft healing and avoid overloading. An early RTS and noncompliance with the biological characteristics of the graft in the various phases are associated with a high incidence of re-injury.

Navigation-Guided Trans-glenoid Flexible Fixation Technique for Arthroscopic Autologous Iliac Crest Grafting Treatment of Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation

Recurrent anterior shoulder dislocations accompanied by severe glenoid bone defects are typically treated with arthroscopy. Until now, autologous iliac grafting has been reported with excellent results, and different techniques of bone fixation have been introduced by numerous scholars. In this article, we introduce a specially designed guide that can achieve accurate positioning of the bone graft and a nonrigid graft fixation technique with a single EndoButton (Smith & Nephew). Using this technique, we greatly simplify the arthroscopic procedure and avoid the use of screws.

Biomechanical Comparison of Three Suspensory Techniques for all Soft Tissue Central Quadriceps Tendon Graft Fixation

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate three different methods of attachment of continuous loop suspensory cortical preparation of all soft tissue central quad tendon grafts compared to a bone block control for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on construct displacement and load to failure.MethodsThirty-two cadaveric central quadriceps tendon (CQT) specimens were harvested, using three clinical techniques for graft fixation: cortical button alone (BTB EB), BTB cortical button with rip-stop suture (BTB RS), and continuous loop cortical button (BTB CL). A control group was also included that consisted of a bone block secured within testing clamps (BTB CON). Specimens were preloaded to 150 N. Tendons were then cyclically loaded between 50 N and 250 N for 1,000 cycles at .5 Hz. Displacement was measured at the point of fixation of the CQT after the 150 N preload, 250 N initial load and every 100th cycle. The specimens were loaded to failure after 1,000 cycles.ResultsThere was a significant increase in displacement from .32 ± .56 mm for the BTB CON to 1.91 ± 1.13 mm for the BTB RS (P = .014) and 3.85 ± 2.32 mm for the BTB CL condition (P = .023). There was no significant increase in displacement for BTB EB (P = .182). Failure occurred for all of the BTB CL and 62.5% of the BTB EB specimens within the first 50 cycles. Twenty-five percent of the BTB CON specimens and 12.5% BTB RS failed at ∼400 and 500 cycles, respectively. Similar failure loads were observed for the BTB CON and the BTB RS (446.4 ± 151.46 N vs 505.74 ± 131.41 N; P = .99) Failure testing was not feasible for the BTB CL and BTB EB preparation methods.ConclusionIn response to cyclic loading, the three all-soft tissue suspensory conditions experienced significantly greater displacement compared to the bone block controls. None of the soft-tissue conditions appeared superior when compared to each other.Clinical RelevanceIt remains unknown which method of soft-tissue suspensory provides optimal fixation. As these autografts become more common, it is essential to evaluate which fixation methods provide superior outcomes

Bone transport combined with bone graft and internal fixation versus simple bone transport in the treatment of large bone defects of lower limbs after trauma

BackgroundBone transport has been successfully applied for the management of large segmental bone defects. However, its main shortcoming is the long-lasting consolidation period, which may cause lots of related complications. To overcome this shortcoming, we developed bone transport combined with bone graft and internal fixation technique. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effects of this modified technique with simple bone transport in the treatment of large segmental bone defects of lower limbs after trauma.MethodsEighty-four patients with large segmental bone defects treated in our institution from January 2014 to January 2017 were selected for retrospective study. A total of 77 cases were completely followed. Among them, 35 patients were treated by bone transport combined with bone graft and internal fixation technique (Group A), and 42 by simple bone transport technique (Group B). Patients with open injuries were classified according to Gustilo-Anderson (GA) classification. The general data of Group A and B were compared. The time in external fixator, total cure time and operation times of two groups were recorded. Ennecking score was used to evaluate the recovery of limb functions while self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) for the postoperative anxiety evaluation. In addition, the total complication incidence was compared between Group A and B.ResultsThere was no significant difference in demographic data between Group A and B (p > 0.05). The time in external fixator of Group A and B was (4.8 ± 1.6) and (18.2 ± 3.9) months, respectively (p < 0.05). The total cure time was (17.6 ± 2.2) and (20.4 ± 2.8) months in Group A and B (p < 0.05). The number of operations in Group A and B was (4.9 ± 1.2) and (4.8 ± 1.0) (p > 0.05). Ennecking score of Group A and B was 84.7 and 75.7% (p < 0.05). SAS score and total complication incidence in Group A were significantly lower than those in Group B (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThe clinical effects of bone transport combined with bone graft and internal fixation technique were better than that of simple bone transport technique, including shorter time in external fixator, shorter total cure time, lower anxiety score and better limb functions.

Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction With Distal Tibial Allograft and Hybrid Fixation

Glenoid grafting is the standard surgical treatment for recurrent shoulder instability with significant glenoid bone loss. Arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction using a distal tibial allograft for anatomic glenoid reconstruction has recently been gaining attention. This article describes the use of a hybrid graft fixation technique with 1 suture-EndoButton device and 1 compression screw in arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction using distal tibial allograft.

Continuous-Loop Tape Technique Has Greater Stiffness and Less Elongation Compared With Tied-Suture Fixation of Full-Thickness All-Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autografts.

Background:Many graft fixation techniques are utilized for full-thickness soft tissue quadriceps tendon autografts during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).Purpose:To determine the tensile properties of all–soft tissue quadriceps tendon graft fixation using a tied-suture versus continuous-loop tape technique. It was hypothesized that the continuous-loop tape technique would have less cyclic elongation and greater ultimate load to failure and stiffness compared with a commonly used tied-suture technique.Study Design:Controlled laboratory study.Methods:Sixteen fresh-frozen human knee specimens were used to harvest a full-thickness all–soft tissue quadriceps tendon graft; half were secured using a Krackow suture technique with 2 braided sutures, and half were secured using a continuous-loop tape suspensory fixation button with a rip-stop stitch. Cyclic and permanent elongation, toe- and linear-region stiffness, and ultimate load were determined. Statistical analysis was performed at P <.05.Results:The tied-suture fixation group demonstrated significantly higher permanent elongation (11.7 ± 3.6 vs 4.2 ± 1.0 mm, P < .001) and cyclic elongation (5.9 ± 1.3 vs 2.0 ± 0.4 mm, P < .001) compared with the continuous-loop tape fixation group. There was a significantly higher linear-region stiffness with continuous-loop tape fixation compared with tied-suture fixation (98.8 ± 12.7 vs 85.5 ± 7.5 N/mm, P = .022). No significant difference in ultimate load between groups (517.1 ± 149.2 vs 465.6 ± 64.6 N) was found. The mode of failure was tendon pull-through for the continuous-loop tape group and suture breakage in the tied-suture group (P < .001).Conclusion:Continuous-loop tape fixation is superior to tied-suture fixation in regard to elongation and stiffness for all–soft tissue quadriceps tendon grafts, but there was no significant difference in ultimate load.Clinical Relevance:Continuous-loop tape fixation of all–soft tissue quadriceps tendon grafts for ACLR is a valid technique with superior tensile properties.

529 Safeguarding Skin Grafts: A 21st Century Algorithm for Fixation Techniques

Abstract Aim Effective skin graft fixation is fundamental in preventing sheering forces, seroma and haematoma from compromising graft take. However, determining the ideal method of graft fixation remains a contentious subject. Currently, there is significant variation in fixation techniques used, based not only on clinical requirement, but also surgeon preference. Evidence-based recommendations are necessary to guide the decision-making process. Method We undertook a PRISMA-based assessment of the literature to define all fixation techniques and analyse their outcomes. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were composed. A search of Medline and Embase was performed, yielding 399 articles. After abstract screening, 96 were included for qualitative data analysis. Results Nine fixation techniques were identified: ‘tie over bolster’, ‘staple fixation’, ‘simple dressings’, ‘quilting sutures’, ‘re-look methods’, ‘foam sponge bolster’, ‘adhesive glues’, ‘negative pressure wound therapy’ and ‘less common techniques. We analyse the available evidence for each technique, identifying 13 studies with level I/II evidence. We summarise the research that underpins these nine categories, proposing an algorithm to facilitate technique selection based on anatomical and patient-specific factors. Conclusions An array of skin graft fixation techniques are used in plastic surgery, without clear guidelines. To our knowledge, this is the first time all fixation techniques have been defined. Our suggested algorithm is intended to aid surgeons in selecting an appropriate fixation technique and should be challenged by future research, particularly randomised control trials.

Posterior Slope Reducing Osteotomy With Concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background: Modern techniques for graft choice, preparation, and fixation for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction demonstrate excellent longevity and return-to-play rates; however, up to 10% to 18% of cases continue to suffer reruptures, with even higher rates in specific subsets of patients. Indications: Normally, the posterior tibial slope is measured between 7° and 10°, with biomechanical and observational studies showing that posterior slope greater than 12° increases the risk of graft failure by 5× by allowing for increased anterior tibial translation, putting increased stress on the graft. The primary indication for a slope correction osteotomy with a revision ACL reconstruction is a patient with tibial slope greater than 12° who has failed prior ACL reconstruction. Technique Description: In our preferred technique, we illustrate a slope reducing anterior closing wedge proximal tibial osteotomy with concurrent revision ACL reconstruction rather than a staged ACL reconstruction. Results: The primary benefit of this technique is the ability to correct the tibial slope and reconstruct the ACL in one setting, which decreases recovery time, costs, and risks to the patients by eliminating an additional procedure. Discussion/Conclusion: In cases of ACL reconstruction failure, particularly in patients with multiple failures, an increased posterior tibial slope may be a contributing factor. Anterior closing wedge osteotomy has been shown to be an effective treatment, in patients with a native slope greater than 12°. A slope reducing anterior closing wedge proximal tibial osteotomy with concurrent revision ACL reconstruction rather than a staged ACL reconstruction has a wide array of benefits.

Profile of complications in pterygium surgery - A retrospective analysis.

Purpose:Analysis of complication profile after pterygium excision, in primary and recurrent pterygia.Methods:Retrospective analysis of all the patients who had undergone pterygium excision in a tertiary center in South India from 2010 to 2018 was analyzed. A total of 2356 eyes in 2028 patients were included in the study. Patients who had undergone conjunctival autografting for primary pterygium, conjunctival limbal autografting for recurrent pterygium, vertical split conjunctival autografting for double head pterygium were included in the study. In all the surgical procedures fibrin glue was used for fixation of the autograft. The follow-up period ranged from 6 months to 75 months, with an average of 17 months. Patients with less than 6 months of follow-up were excluded from the study.Results:The following postoperative complications were noted, Sub-conjunctival hemorrhage in 912 eyes (38.7%), edema of the graft in 522 cases (22.15%), graft loss in 22 cases (0.93%), graft retraction in 692 cases (29.37%) and sliding of the graft was seen in 9 cases (0.38%). Granuloma was seen in 4 cases (0.16%) at the host site and 5 cases (0.21%) at the donor site. Recurrence was seen in 34 patients (1.44%). Other severe complications like corneal melt were seen in only 1 case (0.04%) who was operated on for recurrent pterygium. In comparison between primary and recurrent pterygia; subconjunctival hemorrhage, edema of the graft, graft loss, and recurrence was significantly (P < 0.05%) higher in recurrent pterygia.Conclusion:Various complications can occur post pterygium surgery as listed above. Selecting a proper procedure for a particular type of pterygium with a proper graft fixation technique will improve the outcome with minimal complications.

A review of bone grafting techniques for glenoid reconstruction.

Traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations can cause bony defects of the anterior glenoid rim and are often associated with recurrent shoulder instability. For large glenoid defects of 20-30% without a mobile bony fragment, glenoid reconstruction with bone grafts is often recommended. This review describes two broad categories of glenoid reconstruction procedures found in literature: coracoid transfers involving the Bristow and Latarjet procedures, and free bone grafting techniques. An electronic search of MEDLINE and PubMed was conducted to find original articles that described glenoid reconstruction techniques or modifications to existing techniques. Coracoid transfers involve the Bristow and Latarjet procedures. Modifications to these procedures such as arthroscopic execution, method of graft attachment and orientation have been described. Free bone grafts have been obtained from the iliac crest, distal tibia, acromion, distal clavicle and femoral condyle. Both coracoid transfers and free bone grafting procedures are options for reconstructing large bony defects of the anterior glenoid rim and have had similar clinical outcomes. Free bone grafts may offer greater flexibility in graft shaping and choice of graft size depending on the bone stock chosen. Novel developments tend towards minimising invasiveness using arthroscopic approaches and examining alternative non-rigid graft fixation techniques.

Functional Evaluation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction – Comparison of Two Graft Fixation Techniques in the Femoral Tunnel

Background. There are several fixation techniques and devices available for ACL reconstruction, which differ significantly in their efficacy. There are no studies in the literature comparing femoral transfixation pins (Rigidfix) and adjustable loop (Rigidloop) devices. We compared the outcomes of these devices in our study.Methods. A retrospective observational cohort study was done between November 2017 and June 2019. Of the total 95 cases, initial 47 patients had undergone graft fixation with Rigidfix and the subsequent 48 underwent fixation with Rigidloop. Clinical and functional evaluation of these patients was done at one-year follow-up and the results were compared.Results. The two groups were homogenous demographically. Though better outcome and functional scores were noted in the Rigidfix group, these observations were not statistically significant. Two Rigidloop cases had side to side difference in KT-1000 reading of > 5 mm with a fair outcome.Conclusions. Fixation of the hamstring autograft on the femoral side using Rigidfix cross pin and Rigidloop adjustable suspensory devices provide statistically comparable stability. The Lysholm grading and IKDC-2000 functional scores between both the groups were similar at one-year follow-up and hence can be used interchangeably intraoperatively if a need arises without any consequences