Graft Dislocation Research Articles

Endothelial Keratoplasty Following Glaucoma Filtration Surgery: A UK Tertiary Eye Care Referral Centre Experience.

Purpose: To compare the postoperative complications and clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in eyes with previous glaucoma filtering surgery. Methods: In this retrospective comparative case series, we analysed postoperative visual acuity and intraocular pressure, graft survival, rate of graft detachment and/or dislocation, number of rebubbling and/or graft repositioning procedures, and graft rejection or failure (primary and secondary). Results: Sixteen eyes with DMEK and 80 eyes with DSAEK with previous glaucoma surgery were studied. The results were recorded at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. No statistically significant differences in postoperative visual acuity were found between the two groups at any stage of the follow-up. Intraocular pressure was lower in the DMEK group at the follow-up stage of 3 (p = 0.0022) and 12 months (p = 0.0480). Visually significant graft detachment was recorded in 31.3% and 22.5% of DMEK and DSAEK cases, respectively (p = 0.4541). All DMEK detachments (n = 5) were managed with slit-lamp rebubbling. Out of 18 graft detachments in the DSAEK group, 2 grafts were observed due to small graft detachment, 6 large graft detachments underwent rebubbling performed in the operating theatre, and 10 eyes needed primary graft repositioning for graft dislocation. Conclusions: DMEK is a feasible option to treat endothelial failure in complex eyes with previous glaucoma surgery. In the DMEK group, visual acuity outcomes and possibly postoperative intraocular pressure control were better compared with the DSAEK group.

Comparison of the therapeutic effects of lens capsular flap transplantation and autologous retinal transplantation in the management of refractory macular holes.

To report the comparison of the therapeutic effects of lens capsular flap transplantation (LCT) and autologous retinal transplantation (ART) in refractory macular hole (MH) treatment. Thirty-one patients (31 eyes) with refractory MH were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical procedures: the LCT group (13 eyes) and the ART group (18 eyes). Patients were monitored for a minimum of 6months. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), hole closure rate, postoperative central foveolar thickness (CFT), and some complications (e.g. graft loss or dislocation, postoperative retinal detachment, or postoperatively elevated intraocular pressure) were the primary outcome measures. The mean preoperative MH diameter was 1104 ± 287μm in the LCT group and 1066 ± 297μm in the ART group (t = 0.353, P = 0.727). The MH was closed in 12 patients (92.3%) of the LCT group and 17 patients (94.4%) of the ART group (χ2 = 0.057, P = 0.811); the MHs of 10 patients (76.9%) in the LCT group and 11 patients (61.1%) in the ART group were completely closed (χ2 = 0.864, P = 0.353). The BCVA improved from 2.3 ± 1.0 logMAR preoperatively to 1.3 ± 0.9 logMAR postoperatively in the LCT group and 2.3 ± 0.9 logMAR preoperatively to 1.0 ± 0.6 logMAR postoperatively in the ART group (postoperative BCVA vs preoperative BCVA in the LCT group: t = 4.374, P = 0.001; postoperative BCVA vs preoperative BCVA in the ART group: t = 5.899, P = 0.000018). The visual improvement was 1.3 ± 0.9 logMAR in the ART group and 1.0 ± 0.8 logMAR in the LCT group (t = - 1.033, P = 0.310). The postoperative CFT was 139.7 ± 48.3μm in the LCT and 199.2 ± 25.1μm in the ART group (t = - 4.062, P = 0.001). Graft dislocation emerged in 2 patients (15.4%) in the LCT group and 1 patient (5.6%) in the ART group. Applications of LCT and ART may both enhance anatomical and visual outcomes in refractory MH cases. The ART group exhibited a more optimal postoperative CFT than the LCT group one.

PRETREATED LYOPHILIZED HUMAN AMNIOTIC MEMBRANE GRAFT COVERING FOR RETINAL DETACHMENT WITH POSTERIOR RETINAL BREAKS ABOVE CHORIORETINAL ATROPHY IN PATHOLOGIC MYOPIA.

To compare the surgical results of vitrectomy with untreated or pretreated lyophilized human amniotic membrane grafts covering in treating retinal detachment related to posterior retinal breaks above chorioretinal atrophy in pathologic myopia. Nineteen patients with retinal detachment related to macular hole (MH) located above macular atrophy and/or posterior paravascular retinal breaks (PRBs) located above patchy chorioretinal atrophy in pathologic myopia were included. The eyes of these patients underwent vitrectomy with untreated lyophilized human amniotic membrane covering (n = 10) or perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL)-assisted pretreated lyophilized human amniotic membrane covering (n = 9; grafts were pretreated in 0.125% indocyanine green and 50% hypertonic glucose solution for 15-20 minutes). The closure of the MH or PRBs, reattachment of the retina, and best-corrected visual acuity were measured postoperatively. Postoperatively, graft dislocation or shift was only found in two eyes (20%) in the untreated group. The closure rate of the MH or PRBs was 80% (8/10) and 100% (9/9) in the untreated group and the pretreated group, respectively. The occurrence rate of excessive gliosis was 40% and 11% in the untreated group and the pretreated group, respectively. In both groups, best-corrected visual acuity was improved and the retinal reattachment rate was 100% at the final visit. Perfluorocarbon liquid-assisted pretreated lyophilized human amniotic membrane graft covering was effective in treating retinal detachment related to MH and/or PRBs situated above macular atrophy or patchy chorioretinal atrophy in pathologic myopia. This technique appeared to reduce graft dislocation or shift, promote the closures of MHs/PRBs, and reduce the occurrence of gliosis.

Evaluating the forces involved in bubble management in DMEK surgery: mathematical and computational model with clinical implications.

To model postoperative forces involved in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) tissue adherence and bubble management, including the impact of surface tension on graft support, with a view towards clinical applications. Tennent Institute of Ophthalmology, Glasgow, and James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom. Mathematical modelling and computer simulation. Theoretical modelling of biphasic flow and interaction of gas, liquid and tissue within the anterior chamber for static horizontal scenario A (adherent DMEK with mobile bubble) and dynamic vertical scenario B (release of bubble due to pupil block following DMEK). The model assumed incompressibility for both fluids within realistically achievable pressure ranges. Cahn-Hilliard Navier-Stokes equations were discretised through the application of the Finite Element Method. Mathematical modelling and computer simulation showed bubble size, corneal curvature and force intensity influences surface tension support for DMEK tissue in scenario A. Scenario B demonstrated complex, uneven distribution of surface pressure on the DMEK graft during uncontrolled bubble release. Uneven pressure concentration can cause local tissue warping, with air/fluid displacement via capillary waves generated on the fluid-air interface adversely impacting DMEK support. We have quantitatively and qualitatively modelled the forces involved in DMEK adherence in normal circumstances. We have shown releasing air/gas can abruptly reduce DMEK tissue support via generation of large pressure gradients at the liquid/bubble/graft interfaces, creating negative local forces. Surgeons should consider these principles to reduce DMEK graft dislocation rates via optimised bubble size to graft size, longer acting bubble support and avoiding rapid decompression where possible.

A Comprehensive Investigation Into the Outcomes of Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK) as a Treatment for Corneal Endothelial Disorders.

Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) has emerged as the preferred method for posterior lamellar keratoplasty, as it enables the replacement of the compromised host endothelium with a viable donor lamella. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of DSEK on surgical outcomes and visual acuity. The research was carried out from November 2019 to October 2021, encompassing a sample of 18 patients (18 eyes) who satisfied the inclusion criteria for DSEK. The pre-operative evaluation was performed once before the surgery, while post-operative evaluations were conducted at one, three, and six months after the surgical intervention. The main variables assessed in this study encompassed demographic characteristics, visual acuity, surgical techniques, and surgical complications employed during the surgical procedure. The collected data were statistically analyzed using IBM SPSS software version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Patients in the study ranged in age from 25 to 70, with a mean age of 53.16 ± 14.19 years. The participants were 61% male and 39% female. The main reasons for DSEK use were pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (61%) and post-penetrating keratoplasty (PK) graft failure (17%). The other indications were aphakic bullous keratopathy (11%), bullous keratopathy with cataracts (5%), and Fuchs's endothelial dystrophy (5%). The study included 18 eyes: 14 eyes underwent DSEK, two underwent DSEK with small-incision cataract surgery (SICS) and posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) implantation, and two underwent DSEK with scleral-fixated FIL. A significant improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was observed at six-month follow-up (0.73 ± 0.37 vs. 1.73 ± 0.59 logMAR pre-operatively). During donor cornea dissection, buttonholing was the main concern, occurring 11% of the time. Descemet's perforation and donor preparation thickness variations were also observed. Reverse donor unfolding, incomplete DM stripping, and donor button displacement were quickly addressed and managed. Post-operative graft failure occurred in 22% of cases, while acute graft rejection occurred in 11%. Graft dislocation, pupillary block, and secondary glaucoma each had a 5% prevalence. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty is a safe and effective treatment for corneal endothelial disorders, particularly in cases where scarring is not present. Surgical skills are essential to achieving the desired results. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty is favored over conventional keratoplasty for endothelial dysfunction due to its technical advantages and manageable risks. Our research demonstrates a significant improvement in visual acuity through DSEK. Despite manageable post-operative complications, it is vital to educate patients and medical professionals on surgical complexities. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty appears promising for the treatment of endothelial disorders, but its long-term implications must be studied.

Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: A National Registry-Based Comparison

To compare the outcome between posterior lamellar corneal transplant procedures for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, taking preoperative patient characteristics in consideration. Surgical methods compared were Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), and DSAEK with concomitant cataract surgery (phacoemulsification plus DSAEK). Registry-based study with propensity score matching. One thousand six hundred seventy-seven patients from all Swedish corneal transplantation units treated from 2012 through2019. All patients undergoing endothelial keratoplasty performed from 2012 through 2019 with completed 2-year follow-up data reported to The Swedish Corneal Transplant Register were included, totaling 1677 patients. Three comparable groups (DMEK, DSAEK, and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK) with 216 patients in each group were generated with propensity score matching based on preoperative visual acuity, age, sex, year of surgery, and preoperative risk factors such as inflammation, vascularization, and glaucoma. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the 2-year follow-up, frequency of graft dislocation, graft rejection episodes, and graft failure within 2 years including primary graft failure. The preoperative corneal status was affected more severely in the DSAEK group before matching. In the matched groups, the median BCVA 2 years after surgery was 0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in both the DMEK and the phacoemulsification plus DSAEK groups and 0.15 logMAR in the DSAEK group (P= 0.001). The frequency of graft dislocation was higher among the patients undergoing phacoemulsification plus DSAEK, but the frequency of graft failure and primary graft failure was higher in the DMEK group. Visual acuity improved in most patients (90%) with all 3 surgical methods. However, DMEK and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK reached higher levels of visual acuity 2 years after surgery, and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK was superior considering graft survival rate. All 3 surgical procedures showed both strengths and weaknesses, suggesting that the choice of surgical method should be individualized, taking into consideration not only the cornea, but each patient's complete medical status as well as the entire course of postoperative medical care. The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Graft dislocation into the vitreous cavity

Graft dislocation into the vitreous cavity

Clinical Outcomes of the Intraocular Lens Injector and Busin Glide for Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients with Iridocorneal Endothelial Syndrome.

Purpose: To report the outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) performed in iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome patients using the intraocular lens injector (injector), in comparison with those using the Busin glide. Methods: In this retrospective, interventional comparative study, we evaluated the outcomes of DSAEK performed using the injector (n = 12) or the Busin glide (n = 12) for patients with ICE syndrome. Their graft position and postoperative complications were recorded. Their best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and endothelial cell loss (ECL) were monitored over a 12-month follow-up period. Results: DSAEK was conducted successfully in the 24 cases. The BCVA improved from the preoperative 0.99 ± 0.61 to 0.36 ± 0.35 at 12 months after operation (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between the two groups (the injector group and the Busin group) (p = 0.933). ECL at 1 month after DSAEK was 21.80 ± 15.01% in the injector group, which was significantly lower than 33.69 ± 9.75% of the Busin group (p = 0.031). No surgery-related complications were observed in the 24 cases intraoperatively or postoperatively except that one case suffered from postoperative graft dislocation, without statistical difference between the two groups. Conclusions: At 1 month after surgery, the use of graft injector for delivering DSAEK-based endothelial graft may cause significantly less endothelial cell damage than the pull-through technique used in the application of Busin glide. The injector allows safe endothelial graft delivery without the need of anterior chamber irrigation, which increases the ratio of successful graft attachment.

Is ultra-thin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty a viable alternative to Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ultra-thin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) is a recently developed surgical procedure that has shown promising results for the management of various corneal endothelial diseases. To evaluate the outcomes of the UT-DSAEK to the Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). A systematic analysis of the studies comparing UT-DSAEK with DMEK by evaluating one or more outcomes (vision, complications, and post-operative endothelial cell counts) was performed. The meta-analysis was done if two or more studies reported a common outcome. We used PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases to identify articles comparing the outcomes of UT-DSAEK with DMEK and performed a meta-analysis using RevMan, version 5.4. A total of six studies were included in this review (two randomized clinical trials and four non-randomized comparative studies). Our analysis showed the patients who underwent DMEK cases showed better visual outcomes with a mean difference of 0.06 LogMAR (95% CI: 0.04-0.09) in BCVA, albeit with i 2 of 52% (heterogenous values). The evidence was weak, with the most weightage on retrospective studies. UT-DSAEK showed significantly fewer complications such as graft dislocations, with an odds ratio of 0.25 (95% CI: 0.13-0.48). There was no significant difference in the endothelial cell counts with a mean difference of 86.34 (95%CI: -133.09 to -305.77). Although the literature is limited on UT-DSAEK with post-operative visual acuity that could be practically at par with DMEK, lesser complication rates and comparable post-operative endothelial cells could be a suitable alternative to DMEK for corneal endothelial pathologies.

Graft dislocation following Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: a comparative cohort analysis of Optisol GS and organ culture preserved corneas.

Previous studies have suggested risk factors for graft dislocation after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). We aimed to investigate the influence of eye bank storage solution as a risk factor for graft dislocation, as this could have significant implications for eye banking practices. This retrospective analysis compared cohorts from the QEII Health Sciences Center, Halifax, Canada (donor corneas preserved in Optisol GS) and the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (donor corneas preserved in organ culture). Patient, surgical, and post-operative data were collected for consecutive DSAEK surgeries performed between 2012 and 2020. Risk factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression modeling. 654 DSAEK surgeries were performed during the study period: 271 in the Optisol GS storage cohort and 383 in the organ culture cohort. The most common indications were pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, and failed previous DSAEK. The incidence of graft dislocation requiring surgical repositioning was 9.6% (n = 26) in the Optisol GS cohort and 12.0% (n = 46) in the organ culture cohort (OR, 0.50, 95% CI, 0.20-1.13). Development of graft dislocation was associated with intraoperative venting incisions (OR, 2.50, 95% CI, 1.12-5.51) and a post-operative wound leak (OR, 55.24, 95% CI, 10.20-514.85). The incidence of DSAEK dislocation was similar between study sites using Optisol GS and organ culture, suggesting changes in eye bank storage solution would not mitigate this post-operative complication. Intraoperative creation of venting incisions and post-operative wound leaks and were factors associated with graft dislocation.

Commentary: To evaluate the functional and anatomical outcomes for autologous retinal autograft with Finesse™ Flex Loop for failed macular holes.

Commentary: To evaluate the functional and anatomical outcomes for autologous retinal autograft with Finesse™ Flex Loop for failed macular holes.

Clinical Outcomes of Nanothin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Korean Patients with Corneal Endothelial Dysfunction

PurposeTo evaluate the clinical outcomes of nanothin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in Korean patients with corneal endothelial dysfunction.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed medical records of the patients who underwent nanothin DSAEK (graft thickness ≤50 μm) due to corneal endothelial dysfunction and followed up more than 1 year. We evaluated best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness, and corneal endothelial cell density at preoperative and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.ResultsSixteen eyes of 16 patients with the mean follow-up period of 13.00 ± 0.96 months were included. The mean graft thickness after deswelling was 45.25 ± 4.59 μm (range, 38.0–50.0 μm). The mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution BCVA improved from 1.37 ± 0.53 preoperatively to 0.68 ± 0.46, 0.55 ± 0.35, 0.40 ± 0.25, and 0.39 ± 0.25 at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.005, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001), respectively. The mean central corneal thickness improved from 752.00 ± 129.11 to 555.75 ± 54.66 μm at 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.006). The mean graft endothelial cell density decreased from 2,859.62 ± 228.34 to 1,542.25 ± 627.34 cells/mm2 at 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.012). The postoperative complications included increased intraocular pressure (n = 3, 18.75%) and graft dislocation (n = 1, 6.25%), all of which were successfully managed by anterior chamber paracentesis or rebubbling. No other serious complications were encountered.ConclusionsNanothin DSAEK produced significant and stable visual improvements without severe postoperative complications in Korean patients with corneal endothelial dysfunction.

Pediatric endothelial keratoplasty: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

Recently, endothelial keratoplasty (EK) has been increasingly considered the first intervention in pediatrics with isolated corneal endothelial dysfunction. This systematic review aims to investigate the current evidence about the advantages, disadvantages, technical challenges, and clinical outcomes of EK in the pediatric group. All the English literature relevant to pediatric EK was searched in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases with appropriate keywords. Relevant data were pooled to conduct an individual participant data meta-analysis. Of 1646 articles found initially, 35 articles were finally eligible to be included in our study. A total of 154 eyes of 107 patients underwent Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED) was the most reported indication for pediatric DSAEK (108 eyes). Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) was performed in 2 eyes of 2 cases, one with PPCD and another one in a patient with Kearns-Sayre syndrome. Owing to some specific anatomical and physiological pediatric characteristics, some modifications in a standard procedure were suggested. The average follow-up period was 23.80 ± 20.18months (3months to 8.5years). Seventy-six eyes who had a mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 1.36 ± 0.70 (0.49 to 3) logMAR preoperatively found mean BCVA of 0.51 ± 0.33 (0.04 to 2) logMAR postoperatively. Graft dislocation was the most reported complication (26 eyes). The rate of other complications was low. Endothelial cell loss was reported from 8.3 to 63.7% after pediatric EK with follow-up duration from 3months to 8.3years. EK procedures, despite some technical challenges, are feasible surgical techniques with acceptable visual and anatomical outcomes in the management of pediatrics with corneal endothelial dysfunction and minimal stromal involvement.

Femtosecond laser semi-assisted Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty: 2-year outcomes of endothelial cell loss and graft survival

PurposeTo assess 2-year endothelial cell loss and graft survival after femtosecond laser semi-assisted Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (FLS-DSEK).MethodsIn this prospective and noncomparative study carried out at Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, 85 eyes (84 patients) with endothelial dysfunction receiving FLS-DSEK (n=62, 75.9%) or FLS-DSEK combined with phacoemulsification cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation (n=23, 27.1%) from 2013 through 2016 were included. The graft endothelial cell loss, endothelial graft thickness, visual acuity, and complications after surgery were evaluated.ResultsThin endothelial grafts were all successfully prepared, with no occurrence of perforation. The rate of endothelial cell loss was 17.4%, 18.8%, 19.9%, and 26.7%, and the central graft thickness was 113±54 μm, 102±40 μm, 101±28 μm, and 96±23 μm at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. The median best-corrected visual acuity was 0.4 logMAR (range, 0–2 logMAR) at 24 months, demonstrating a significant difference from that before surgery (2 logMAR; range, 0.2–3 logMAR) (T=187.5, P<.001). Partial graft dislocation was the most common postoperative complication, with an occurrence rate of 14% (n=12), and it was associated with an abnormal iris-lens diaphragm (r=.35, P<.001). The other complications included a high intraocular pressure (n=5, 6%), endothelial graft rejection (n=4, 5%), and pupillary block (n=1, 1%). Endothelial graft decompensation occurred in the two eyes, and 98% (n=83) of the grafts survived at 24 months.ConclusionsData of the study suggest that the treatment using FLS-DSEK seems to be promising and might be considered a feasible choice in patients with endothelial dysfunction.Trial registration1. Date of registration: 2021-02-182. Trial registration number: ChiCTR21000440913. Registration site: https://www.chictr.org.cn/

Postoperative supine position after primary Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty reduces graft detachment rate

ObjectiveTo characterize the association between prolonged supine postoperative positioning of patients undergoing Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and graft dislocation rate. MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, medical records of patients who underwent uncomplicated DSAEK surgery at Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center between 2010 and 2019 were reviewed. Nursing documentation of patients’ adherence to supine positioning during the postoperative hospitalization period was collected. A patient was considered compliant if he or she was documented as cooperative with supine positioning throughout the first 24 hours. ResultsA total of 170 eyes of 138 patients were found eligible. Main indications for surgery were pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (50.6%), previous graft failure (25.9%), and Fuch's endothelial dystrophy (FED; 20.6%). Twelve surgeries were combined with cataract extraction. Postoperative graft detachment occurred in 26 eyes (15.3%) after an average period of 1 day (range, 0–20 days). Compliance with supine positioning was documented in 84.1% (n = 143 patients). Noncompliance rates during the first 24 hours in the detached and nondetached groups were 26.9% (n = 7) and 14.4% (n = 20), respectively; after adjustment for possible confounders, the odds ratio (OR) was 1.44 (p = 0.249). Graft dislocation was observed in 13.3% (19 of 143) and 25.9% (7 of 27) of cooperative and noncooperative patients, respectively (p = 0.17). Subanalysis of 120 eyes with either BPK or FED for which it was the first transplantation demonstrated a protective effect of supine positioning (OR 3.42, confidence interval 1.095–10.700; p = 0.034). Findings for both groups remained unchanged in multivariate analysis. ConclusionsWe found a statistically significant protective effect of 24 hours of postoperative supine positioning against graft detachment after DSAEK in eyes with no prior transplantations.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Ocular Hypertension/Glaucoma After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PurposeTo evaluate the incidence, demographics, associated risk factors, management and clinical outcomes of ocular hypertension/glaucoma after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).MethodsA cohort review of 81 DSAEK cases was performed at Queen Victoria Hospital, United Kingdom. Patients with pre-existing glaucoma, transient increased IOP within the first 48 hours post-graft, additional post-transplant surgery, or failed to complete one year follow-up were excluded from the study. Ocular hypertension was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation >21mmHg or ≥6mmHg from baseline at any postoperative visit. The study looked at the incidence, risk factors, response to anti-glaucoma treatment, graft failure and best corrected visual acuity.ResultsThe incidence of post-DSAEK ocular hypertension and glaucoma was 51.9% and 13.6%, respectively. Steroid-induced IOP elevation was the most frequent cause, with an incidence of 38.3%. Risk factors such as pseudophakia (p=0.024) and preoperative IOP>16 (p=0.003) were found to be associated with post-DSAEK ocular hypertension. Preoperative IOP>16 had 5.27 times risk of IOP elevation. Eyes with graft dislocation and/or detachment were significantly associated with post-DSAEK glaucoma (p=0.038). There was no negative effect of OHT on visual acuity and graft status.ConclusionGlaucoma and OHT are common postoperative complications of DSAEK. Although steroid-induced IOP elevation was the most frequent cause, there are other reasons associated with development of post-DSAEK glaucoma, including graft dislocation and detachment. Eyes with preoperative IOP>16 mm Hg may require a close monitoring of IOP. In addition, management by medical treatment results in good visual acuity and graft clarity.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in vitrectomized eyes: a case series of outcomes and complications.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in vitrectomized eyes. A multi-surgeon, retrospective case series of previously vitrectomized eyes that underwent DMEK between 2013 and 2018 at Moorfields Eye Hospital. Patients' demographics, preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data were collected. In total, 14 eyes of 13 patients, aged 63 ± 14.6years were included. Three eyes had intraoperative posterior dislocation of the DMEK graft into the vitreous cavity, two of these were aphakic and one had an unstable PCIOL. Postoperatively, one graft had a total detachment and required repeat keratoplasty for primary failure, two grafts had visually significant partial detachment and needed rebubbling. Three patients developed high intraocular pressure (IOP) and one required an urgent glaucoma drainage device 1-month post-DMEK. The mean corrected distance visual acuity was 0.81 ± 0.42 logMAR preoperatively, and postoperatively was 0.6 ± 0.51 at 3 months (p = 0.414); 0.69 ± 0.81 at 6 months (p = 0.684); and 0.7 ± 0.8 at 12 months (p = 0.658). DMEK in vitrectomized eyes has unique challenges that necessitate careful preoperative planning. We observed a significant proportion of dislocated grafts in vitrectomized eyes with either unstable IOL or aphakic. Moreover, vitrectomized eyes with secondary glaucoma may be particularly vulnerable to uncontrolled IOP postoperatively and close monitoring is essential to prevent worsening of visual acuity. We recommend that DMEK may not be a feasible option in eyes that are prone to collapse, in particular aphakic vitrectomized eyes, as opposed to DSAEK or penetrating keratoplasty.

The causes of Latarjet surgery failure and the revision surgeries

To review the causes of Latarjet surgery failure and various revision surgeries, in order to provide the reference for the revision of treatment options for Latarjet surgery failure. Literature on the causes of Latarjet surgery failure and revision surgeries was extensively reviewed and analyzed. Latarjet surgery is widely used in clinical practice for recurrent anterior dislocation of shoulder with glenoid defects, especially for the defects of more than 25%. The main reasons for its failure are ununion, bone resorption, graft dislocation, trauma, and graft fracture, etc. The revision surgeries are diverse, the standard treatment has not yet been formed. The revision surgeries include open iliac bone grafting, microscopic Eden-Hybinette surgery, soft tissue reconstruction, open or arthroscopic bone grafting, etc. The differences among the revisions are mainly reflected in grafts, complications, and their costs. Latarjet surgery is difficult to operate and requires high technical requirements for the surgeons. It is necessary to continuously improve the surgical technology to reduce the complications related to Latarjet surgery and its revision surgery.

Impact of fibrin glue versus suture closure on double-headed pterygia in Asian eyes – a 7-year study in a tertiary institution

Background To compare the recurrence rate and outcomes of double-headed pterygia using fibrin glue versus suture closure of conjunctival autograft. Methods All patients with double-headed pterygia who underwent pterygia excision with conjunctival autograft from January 2012 to January 2019 in the National University Hospital of Singapore were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether fibrin glue or sutures were used to secure the conjunctival autograft in place. All patients had a minimum of 6 months follow-up. Results A total (26 patients) of 22 eyes had fibrin glue, while eight eyes underwent suture closure of their conjunctival autograft. Fibrin glue group had 4.5% recurrence rate, while suture group had 37.5% recurrence rate (p = .021). There is statistically significant improvement for overall visual acuity (p = .009) and cylinder (p = .002). There is also statistically significant improvement for visual acuity in the glue group (p = .026), but not in the suture group. Fibrin glue group had a shorter operation duration time compared to suture group (p < .001). There were no cases of graft dislocation, contraction or limbal stem cell deficiency. Conclusions Low recurrence rates and good postoperative visual outcomes can be achieved with the split conjunctival autograft technique. Our study suggests that fibrin glue has an additional benefit over the use of sutures in the management of these complex cases.

Using fibrin sealant for skin graft fixation to avoid sedation in children with burns: a prospective study.

To investigate whether a fibrin sealant, Fitrix (Sanquin Blood Supply Foundation, The Netherlands), for fixation of skin grafts in children with burn wounds is less invasive and equally effective in comparison with skin staples. A single-centre prospective observational cohort study was conducted. Children requiring skin grafting after burns were included and received the fibrin sealant. This group was compared with a retrospective control group of children whose skin grafts were fixed with skin staples. Study outcomes were graft take, graft dislocation, other wound complications, healing and need for sedation. In the fibrin sealant and the control groups, 17 and 27 patients were included, respectively. The percentage of total body surface area (%TBSA) grafted was smaller (p=0.028) in the fibrin sealant group (median 1.0, interquartile range (IQR) 1.5 versus 2.0, IQR 2.5). There was no significant difference in graft take or wound healing. There were two graft dislocations in the fibrin sealant group and none in the control group. Other complications included a patient with graft failure in the fibrin sealant group, and another patient with a vanishing graft and wound infection in the control group. There were fewer sedations in the fibrin sealant group compared with the control group (one versus 20, p<0.0001). The fibrin sealant used in this study was non-inferior for the fixation of skin grafts in comparison with skin staples, and avoided sedation procedures.