Graduate Medical Education Curricula Research Articles

Components of an Updated Disaster Medicine Curriculum Included in Emergency Medicine Residency and Emergency Medical Services Fellowship in the United States.

Disaster medicine (DM) is a unique field that has undergone significant development as disaster events become increasingly complicated to respond to. However, DM is not recognized by the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) or Accreditation Committee of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), and therefore lacks board certification. Furthermore, prior studies have shown that there is unique body of DM knowledge not being addressed in emergency medicine (EM) residency or Emergency Medical Services (EMS) fellowship, resulting in fundamental DM topics not being covered amongst graduate medical education (GME) programs most prepared to produce DM physicians. A recently published DM core curriculum addresses this knowledge gap and seeks to promote standardization of DM training. The objective of this study is to analyze EM residency and EMS fellowship curricula for the inclusion of DM major curriculum topics and subtopics, using the most recently published DM core curriculum as a control. Both EM residency and EMS fellowship curricula were analyzed for inclusion of DM curriculum topics and subtopics, using the DM curriculum recommendations published by Wexler, et al as a control. A major curriculum topic was deemed covered if at least one related subtopic was described in the curricula. The included and excluded DM topics and subtopics were analyzed using descriptive statistics. While all the DM major curriculum topics were covered by either EM residency or EMS fellowship, EMS fellowship covered more major curriculum topics (14/15; 93%) than EM residency (12/15; 80%) and EMS fellowship covered more DM curriculum subtopics (58/153; 38%) than EM residency (24/153; 16%). Combined, EM residency and EMS fellowship covered 65 out of 153 (42%) of the DM curriculum subtopics. Although this study finds that all the DM major curriculum topics will be covered in EM residency followed by EMS fellowship, over one-half of the subtopics are not covered by either program (16% and 38%, respectively) or both programs combined (42%). Increasingly relevant subtopics, such as climate change, droughts, and flooding, are amongst those not covered by either curriculum. Even amongst the DM topics included in GME curricula, an emphasis on themes such as mass treatment, preparedness, and mitigation is likely under-represented. Accreditation from ACGME for DM fellowship would further promote uniform implementation of the updated core curriculum and ensure optimal training of disaster-ready physicians.

"A Fifty-Year Review of Congressional Membership by Healthcare Professionals: Is Surgical Representation Adequate for Informed Legislation?"

Whereas 100% of Congressional legislators vote on healthcare policy, only a minority have a background in healthcare. A review of the participation of healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Congress, highlighting participation by surgeons, is critical to the future policy-making endeavors in healthcare. This article seeks to better understand the characteristics of HCPs that engage in advocacy and describe the trends in their representation in Congress, with commentary on participation by surgeons and its impact on current health advocacy efforts.A search of Congress.gov and the Biographical Directory of the United States Congress was performed to identify professional healthcare history for each Congressperson, followed by review of official campaign websites for health advocacy work. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM® SPSS® Statistics Software for changes in representation of healthcare professionals, physicians, and surgeons in Congress over time.While there has been increasing representation of HCPs in Congress in the last 25 years, surgeons have the lowest increase in Congressional membership. For healthcare reform to optimally address high costs, variable insurance coverage and reimbursement rates, and equal access to care, more physicians must make healthcare advocacy efforts an integral part of their careers. Incorporation of education in areas of healthcare advocacy and/or reform into undergraduate and graduate medical education curricula may help address deficiencies in knowledge of current healthcare-related events to further encourage involvement in healthcare legislation.

Integrating Telemedicine Training into the Graduate Medical Education Curriculum

Objectives The primary objective of this study was to examine current emergency medicine resident knowledge of telemedicine, expose residents to standardized telemedicine patients virtually, and analyze the effectiveness of telemedicine training on completing a successful encounter. Methods emergency medicine residents first underwent a virtual standardized telemedicine encounter using the ZoomTM telecommunications application without prior training in telemedicine. Standardized patients were then queried on resident success during this untrained encounter using a survey with aspects of a successful telemedicine encounter. The following session involved a lecture by a telemedicine physician. After this intervention, the residents underwent a repeat virtual encounter, with standardized patients responding to the same questions on the fundamental aspects of a successful interview. Residents also underwent a post-survey on their experiences with the training. Results Statistically significant differences were noted on aspects of the encounter related to obtaining informed consent (0% vs. 61%, p = 0.00012), asking about privacy in the patient’s environment (6% vs. 87%, p <0.00001), verifying name and/or date of birth (29% vs. 94%, p =0.00014), explaining the telehealth process and expectations to the patient (0% vs. 94%, p <0.00001). No statistical significance was seen with: resident introducing themselves (94% vs. 100%, p =.31732), asking focused questions about medical condition (100% vs. 100% p = 1), closing the encounter by explaining care plan (94% vs. 94%, p = 1). Conclusions Overall, emergency medicine residents had significant improvement on aspects of an encounter with a standardized patient that were unique to telemedicine after undergoing training from an expert in the field. Similar training could easily be utilized across the country in emergency medicine residencies. This training could prove to be essential in the future because of the global health crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic, but also for rural emergency patient care and remote educational programs.

Teaching Frailty to Medical Residents: A Needs Assessment Among Geriatrics Faculty.

Knowledge of frailty is essential for meeting the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies for US trainees. The UK General Medical Council requires that frailty be included in undergraduate and graduate medical education curricula. Trainees are expected to appropriately modify care plans and help make patient-centered decisions, while incorporating diagnostic uncertainty, such as frailty, in older adults. Little is known about current needs for frailty instruction in graduate medical education in the US and beyond. We sought to capture faculty perceptions on how frailty should be defined and identified, and what aspects and level of detail should be taught to residents. The authors developed a 4-item short response questionnaire, and faculty had the option to respond via electronic survey or via semi-structured interviews. Respondents included 24 fellowship-trained geriatricians based at 6 different academic medical centers in a single urban metropolitan area. An invitation to participate in either an electronic survey or semi-structured virtual interview was e-mailed to 30 geriatricians affiliated with an academic multi-campus Geriatric Medicine fellowship. Responses were transcribed and coded independently by two authors. Responses were received from 24 geriatricians via a combination of digital questionnaires (n=18) and semi-structured online interviews (n=6), for a response rate of 80%. Responses revealed significant diversity of opinion on how to define and identify frailty and how these concepts should be taught. As frailty is increasingly incorporated into clinical practice, consensus is needed on how to define and teach frailty to residents.

Cross-border contextualisation of family medicine curriculum: an examination of the process.

This study explores a method of transferring a post graduate medical education curriculum internationally and contextualising it to the local environment. This paper also explores the experiences of those local medical educationalists involved in the process. Several methods were implemented. Firstly, a modified Delphi process for the contextualisation of learning outcomes was implemented with a purposefully sampled expert group of Malaysian Family Medicine Specialists. Secondly a small group review for supporting materials was undertaken. Finally, qualitative data in relation to the family medicine specialists' experiences of the processes was collected via online questionnaire and analysed via template analysis. Descriptive statistics were used. Learning outcomes were reviewed over three rounds; 95.9% (1691/1763) of the learning outcomes were accepted without modification, with the remainder requiring additions, modifications, or deletions. Supporting materials were extensively altered by the expert group. Template analysis showed that Family Medicine Specialists related positively to their involvement in the process, commenting on the amount of similarity in the medical curriculum whilst recognising differences in disease profiles and cultural approaches. Learning outcomes and associated material were transferable between "home" and "host" institution. Where differences were discovered this novel approach places "host" practitioners' experiences and knowledge central to the adaptation process, thereby rendering a fit for purpose curriculum. Host satisfaction with the outcome of the processes, as well as ancillary benefits were clearly identified.

Financial Leadership Skills Training: Can a Hybrid Didactic/Interactive Exercise Model Fill a Gap in Graduate Medical Education?

Background With recent healthcare changes, competition for financial resources is increasing. Graduate medical education (GME) programs do not routinely prepare residents to understand the complexity of financial decisions that affect their practice. At our institution, we designed new sessions to explore personal and departmental financial education in our yearly Radiation Oncology (RO) leadership course. Methods Over the past five years, we have been piloting a longitudinal leadership course for our RO medical and physics residents, integrating a hybrid didactic/interactive exercise approach. The core RO faculty consists of the course director, the residency directors, and department leadership. The course structure includes an introduction to understanding how resource allocation is determined at the institutional level as well as a personal finance component. We recruited the RO Vice Chair, RO Department Administrator, and the MD, MBA Chair of the Vacancy Review Committee at our institution to teach these concepts over three sessions. The first was a didactic introduction to departmental finance by our Vice Chair to prepare attendees for the second interactive session, in which residents worked through a pro forma to determine the feasibility of hiring a new departmental faculty member. The final session was led by our MD, MBA colleague who taught residents how hiring decisions are made and explained what happens to the pro forma at the institutional level. The third session integrated an interactive exercise focusing on personal finance skills. Results At the end of the series, the ten resident attendees were informally surveyed regarding how effective and worthwhile the three finance sessions were. The verbal feedback regarding the curriculum was uniformly positive. All ten residents, including the physics resident, indicated that these classes were helpful and filled a gap in the current GME curriculum. Further feedback analysis noted that additional interactive exercises should be prioritized to reinforce understanding of these financial concepts. Discussion Financial education is lacking in most GME training programs. Targeted instruction for both personal and departmental financial decisions was well received in this novel course at our institution. Further studies are needed to determine effectiveness and optimal integration of financial leadership skill development in the GME setting. Future directions could be to determine the best balance of didactic instruction and interactive exercises to enhance resident understanding of these financial topics. With recent healthcare changes, competition for financial resources is increasing. Graduate medical education (GME) programs do not routinely prepare residents to understand the complexity of financial decisions that affect their practice. At our institution, we designed new sessions to explore personal and departmental financial education in our yearly Radiation Oncology (RO) leadership course. Over the past five years, we have been piloting a longitudinal leadership course for our RO medical and physics residents, integrating a hybrid didactic/interactive exercise approach. The core RO faculty consists of the course director, the residency directors, and department leadership. The course structure includes an introduction to understanding how resource allocation is determined at the institutional level as well as a personal finance component. We recruited the RO Vice Chair, RO Department Administrator, and the MD, MBA Chair of the Vacancy Review Committee at our institution to teach these concepts over three sessions. The first was a didactic introduction to departmental finance by our Vice Chair to prepare attendees for the second interactive session, in which residents worked through a pro forma to determine the feasibility of hiring a new departmental faculty member. The final session was led by our MD, MBA colleague who taught residents how hiring decisions are made and explained what happens to the pro forma at the institutional level. The third session integrated an interactive exercise focusing on personal finance skills. At the end of the series, the ten resident attendees were informally surveyed regarding how effective and worthwhile the three finance sessions were. The verbal feedback regarding the curriculum was uniformly positive. All ten residents, including the physics resident, indicated that these classes were helpful and filled a gap in the current GME curriculum. Further feedback analysis noted that additional interactive exercises should be prioritized to reinforce understanding of these financial concepts. Financial education is lacking in most GME training programs. Targeted instruction for both personal and departmental financial decisions was well received in this novel course at our institution. Further studies are needed to determine effectiveness and optimal integration of financial leadership skill development in the GME setting. Future directions could be to determine the best balance of didactic instruction and interactive exercises to enhance resident understanding of these financial topics.

The Current State of Antiracism Curricula in Undergraduate and Graduate Medical Education: A Qualitative Study of US Academic Health Centers

We undertook a study to evaluate the current state of pedagogy on antiracism, including barriers to implementation and strengths of existing curricula, in undergraduate medical education (UME) and graduate medical education (GME) programs in US academic health centers. We conducted a cross-sectional study with an exploratory qualitative approach using semistructured interviews. Participants were leaders of UME and GME programs at 5 institutions participating in the Academic Units for Primary Care Training and Enhancement program and 6 affiliated sites from November 2021 to April 2022. A total of 29 program leaders from the 11 academic health centers participated in this study. Three participants from 2 institutions reported the implementation of robust, intentional, and longitudinal antiracism curricula. Nine participants from 7 institutions described race and antiracism-related topics integrated into health equity curricula. Only 9 participants reported having "adequately trained" faculty. Participants mentioned individual, systemic, and structural barriers to implementing antiracism-related training in medical education such as institutional inertia and insufficient resources. Fear related to introducing an antiracism curriculum and undervaluing of this curriculum relative to other content were identified. Through learners and faculty feedback, antiracism content was evaluated and included in UME and GME curricula. Most participants identified learners as a stronger voice for transformation than faculty; antiracism content was mainly included in health equity curricula. Inclusion of antiracism in medical education requires intentional training, focused institutional policies, enhanced foundational awareness of the impact of racism on patients and communities, and changes at the level of institutions and accreditation bodies.

Graduate Medical Education Training and the Health of Indigenous Peoples.

Graduate Medical Education Training and the Health of Indigenous Peoples.

Graduate medical education curriculum regarding the health and healthcare of older lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) adults

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) adults experience a wide variety of unique challenges accessing healthcare. These barriers may be exacerbated among older LGBTQ+ people due to intersecting, marginalized identities. To prepare physicians to address the healthcare needs of older LGBTQ+ adults, graduate medical education (GME) must include training about the specific needs of this population. Prior studies demonstrate a lack of LGBTQ+ training in GME curricula. Here, we investigated the presence of LGBTQ+ curricula in internal medicine residencies and geriatrics fellowships through a national survey. Over 62.0% of internal medicine (n = 49) and 65.6% (n = 21) of geriatric medicine fellowship program directors, responding to the survey, reported content relevant to the health of older LGBTQ+ adults. Education about LGBTQ+ health in internal medicine residencies and geriatrics fellowships is vital for the provision of culturally-competent healthcare and to create an inclusive environment for older LGBTQ+ patients.

Quality of ICU Discharge Summaries Produced by Pediatric Residents: The Memorial Health University Medical Center Experience.

Discharging intensive care unit (ICU) patients directly home is becoming more common. High-quality ICU discharge summaries are crucial in the transition of patient care. Currently, at Memorial Health University Medical Center (MHUMC), there exists no standardized ICU discharge summary template or consistency when discharge documentation is completed. Investigators evaluated the timeliness and completeness of ICU discharge summaries at MHUMC produced by pediatric residents. A single-center retrospective chart review of pediatric patients discharged directly from a 10-bed Pediatric ICU to home was conducted. Charts were evaluated pre- and post-intervention. The intervention included the implementation of a standardized ICU discharge template, formal resident training in writing discharge summaries, and a new policy mandating documentation completion within 48 hours of patient discharge. Timeliness was based on documentation completion within 48 hours. Completeness was evaluated on the presence of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations' (JCAHO) recommendations of specific components that should be included in all discharge summaries. Results were reported as proportions, with differences calculated using Fisher's exact and chi-square tests. Patient descriptive characteristics were recorded. Thirty-nine total patients, 13 pre-intervention and 26 post-intervention were included in the study. In the pre-intervention group, 38.5% (5/13) had discharge summaries completed in less than 48 hours from patient discharge compared to 88.5% (23/26) in the post-intervention group (P=.002). Post-intervention discharge documentation was more likely than pre-intervention to contain the discharge diagnosis (100% vs. 69.2%, P=.009) and to provide follow-up care instructions for the outpatient physician (100% vs. 75%, P=.031). Standardizing discharge summary templates and encouraging stricter institutional policies regarding the timely completion of discharge summaries can improve the ICU discharge process. Formal resident training in medical documentation is important and should be incorporated into graduate medical education curricula.

Design and implementation of a health systems science curriculum at a large teaching hospital

BackgroundPhysicians must increasingly lead change for improvement in the value of health care for individuals and populations. Leadership, stewardship, and population health competencies are not explicitly part of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requirements and are best appreciated in the context of Health Systems Science (HSS).HSS education is best approached at the institutional level, yet almost all graduate medical education (GME) curriculum is at the program level. We describe the process of designing and implementing an institutional HSS GME curriculum in a hospital-based sponsoring institution.MethodsA group of diverse stakeholders drafted a curriculum to build competencies in leadership, stewardship, and population health, which was further refined by our Graduate Medical Education Committee (GMEC) and Resident Forum in the academic years 2015–2017. The refined curriculum was implemented at the institutional level of a large urban teaching hospital with over 80 ACGME accredited programs in the 2017–2018 academic year, participation was tracked and impact surveys were conducted.ResultsAll programs participate in at least parts of the curriculum with sustained use. Annual surveys show a progression in assessment of our target competencies and/or opportunities to reflect and provide feedback. The annual program review meeting and GMEC meetings are used to troubleshoot and identify new curricular opportunities.ConclusionThis innovative institutional curriculum has been sustained for over four years and we believe that other training institutions with similar goals will find our experience implementing an institutional curriculum translatable to their clinical learning environment.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Commitment to excellence in obstetrical care, research, and education for people with diverse sexual and gender identities

The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine seeks to ensure excellence in obstetrical outcomes for all people who desire or experience pregnancy, including people with diverse sexual and gender identities. The Society commits to the use of practices in clinical and research settings that affirm the sexual and gender identities of all people, encourages the development of undergraduate and graduate medical education curricula and training programs that address diverse pathways to pregnancy and support clinicians with diverse sexual and gender identities, and promotes the use of inclusive language that is accurate and, when possible, specific.

Action in Healthcare Sustainability is a Surgical Imperative: This is a Novel Way to Do It

The healthcare system accounts for 8%-10% of all greenhouse gas emissions in the United States and hospital buildings are significant contributors. Operating rooms account for 20%-33% of all hospital waste. This may contribute to significant climate change and negatively affect public health. Physicians and surgeons must act to reduce our collective carbon footprint to improve the health of our patients. The traditional graduate medical education curriculum does not routinely train future generations of physicians in healthcare sustainability. We describes a fellowship program designed to change this. The Cleveland Clinic surgical residency has implemented a unique educational program. Here we describe the 5-year results of our novel fellowship program in health care sustainability, primarily focused on greening the operating room. Selected General Surgery residents interested in healthcare sustainability and greening the operating room. We have successfully implemented a novel resident focused fellowship program in healthcare sustainability. Fellowship projects have led to significant reductions in our hospitals' collective carbon footprint. Surgeons have a unique responsibility to reduce the carbon footprint of the Operating Room. Implementing a dedicated fellowship program or similar intensive educational experience in healthcare sustainability within the framework of a graduate medical education curriculum will help to ensure future generations of surgeons are thoughtful leaders in environmental stewardship.

Empathy Can Be Taught, and Patients Teach it Best.

Empathy toward patients is an essential skill for a physician to deliver the best care for any patient. Empathy also protects the physician from moral injury and decreases the chances for malpractice litigations. The current graduate medical education curriculum allows trainees to graduate without getting focused training to develop empathy as a core competency domain. The tools to measure empathy inherently lack validity. The accurate measure of the provider’s empathy comes from the patient’s perspectives of their experience and their feedback, which is rarely reaching the trainee. The hidden curriculum in residency programs gives mixed messages to trainees due to inadequate role modeling by attending physicians. This narrative style manuscript portrays a teachable moment at the bedside vividly. The teaching team together reflected upon the lack of empathy, took steps to resolve the issue. The attending demonstrated role modeling as an authentic and impactful technique to teach empathy. The conclusion includes a proposal to include the patient’s real-time feedback to trainees as an essential domain under Graduate Medical Education core competencies of professionalism and patient care.

Expanding Training in Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Through a Multispecialty Graduate Medical Education Curriculum Designed for Fellows.

IntroductionAlthough the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires quality improvement and patient safety (QIPS) training for fellow-level trainees, this experience is often insufficient due to lack of faculty time and expertise within fellowship training programs. We developed a centralized GME curriculum targeted to an integrated, multispecialty audience of fellow-level trainees with the goal of promoting leadership and scholarship in QIPS.MethodsThe University of Colorado implemented the Fellows' Quality and Safety Academy, a three-seminar curriculum in patient safety and health systems improvement. As most participants had prior training in QIPS during medical school or residency, educational strategies emphasized application of QIPS concepts through focused didactic content review paired with small-group case-based exercises and coaching of experiential project work to promote content mastery as well as practice of leadership and scholarship strategies.ResultsSince the curriculum's inception in 2017, there have been 106 participants in the Foundations in Patient Safety seminar, 49 participants in the Adverse Events Into Quality Improvement seminar, and 48 participants in the Quality in Academics seminar. These participants represented 44 separate fellowship disciplines from both adult and pediatric subspecialties. Learners reported improved attitudes and confidence and demonstrated objective knowledge acquisition across QIPS content domains.DiscussionOur pedagogical approach of centralizing QIPS training and harnessing faculty expertise to teach fellow-level trainees across specialties through interdisciplinary collaboration and interactive project-based work is an effective strategy to promote development of QIPS competencies during fellowship training.

Post Graduate Education: Is Genomics Included on Board Certification Exams?

Integrating clinical genetic education in physician training is an important strategic approach in the era of genomic medicine. To understand how much the board examinations of the American Board of Medical Specialties contain genomics-related content, a descriptive analysis of 21 exam blueprints was performed. Topics in genomics were not included in 43% of specialty blueprints which shows underrepresentation of clinical genetics in graduate medical education curricula.

Leadership training programs in graduate medical education: a systematic review

BackgroundWith the increasing recognition that leadership skills can be acquired, there is a heightened focus on incorporating leadership training as a part of graduate medical education. However, there is considerable lack of agreement regarding how to facilitate acquisition of these skills to resident, chief resident, and fellow physicians.MethodsArticles were identified through a search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycNet, Cochrane Systemic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1948 to 2019. Additional sources were identified through contacting authors and scanning references. We included articles that described and evaluated leadership training programs in the United States and Canada. Methodological quality was assessed via the MERSQI (Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument).ResultsFifteen studies, which collectively included 639 residents, chief residents, and fellows, met the eligibility criteria. The format, content, and duration of these programs varied considerably. The majority focused on conflict management, interpersonal skills, and stress management. Twelve were prospective case series and three were retrospective. Seven used pre- and post-test surveys, while seven used course evaluations. Only three had follow-up evaluations after 6 months to 1 year. MERSQI scores ranged from 6 to 9.ConclusionsDespite interest in incorporating structured leadership training into graduate medical education curricula, there is a lack of methodologically rigorous studies evaluating its effectiveness. High-quality well-designed studies, focusing particularly on the validity of content, internal structure, and relationship to other variables, are required in order to determine if these programs have a lasting effect on the acquisition of leadership skills.

Teaching Health Policy in Graduate Medical Education: Proposed Curricular Components

This article was migrated. The article was not marked as recommended. IssueThe layers of systems affecting patient care, including that of clinic and hospital policy as well as state and federal laws, are the topic of one of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s six Core Competencies. Health policy, a key aspect of Systems Based Practice, often receives limited exposure in graduate medical education (GME).EvidenceA 15-point framework for teaching health policy in undergraduate medical education was published earlier this decade. At the GME level, several programs – both institutional and specialty-specific - have described their experience teaching health policy to their own learners. We therefore expand on the previously described framework adapting it for the development of a GME curriculum focused on U.S. domestic health policy. In addition, we analyze how well the currently employed Milestones address important health policy concepts.ImplicationsReview of the Milestones of across all specialties reveal that four components - health insurance, history and consequences of major health care legislation, health disparities, and U.S. healthcare system, financing, and payment – remain underrepresented in the current approach to teaching health policy in graduate medical education. We recommend a centralized approach from institutional GME programs to address shared curricular needs in health policy supplemented by tailored content designed to solidify these concepts with a specialty-specific focus.

ASSESSMENT OF RESIDENT KNOWLEDGE REGARDING ANAPHYLAXIS USING AN ELECTRONIC EDUCATIONAL MODULE AND PRE/POST QUESTIONNAIRE

Introduction Anaphylaxis is an acute, life-threatening systemic hypersensitivity reaction that is frequently underdiagnosed, underreported, and undertreated by medical professionals. There is limited graduate medical education (GME) curriculum dedicated to allergy/immunology (A/I) topics, including anaphylaxis. We hypothesized that providing an electronic educational learning module would improve resident knowledge regarding anaphylaxis diagnosis and treatment. Methods Participants included pediatric, internal medicine, family medicine, and emergency medicine residents of all training levels. Participants watched a pre-recorded 15-minute video module reviewing high yield topics regarding the diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis. General knowledge regarding the diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis was evaluated by a 10-point questionnaire before and 5 weeks following completion of the module. Results The pre-test questionnaire and educational module was completed by 78 residents, whose training level was either PGY-1, PGY-2, PGY-3 or higher. Over half of the participants (60%) had prior clinical experience diagnosing and treating anaphylaxis, yet only 15% had completed a rotation in A/I. Overall, the number of questions answered correctly in the post-test questionnaire (88%) was higher than the pre-test questionnaire (80%) (p-value Conclusions Residents from various levels of training and specialties improved their knowledge in diagnosis and treatment of anaphylaxis after participation in an electronic educational module.

Comprehensive Internal Medicine Residency Curriculum on Primary Care of Patients Who Identify as LGBT.

Graduate medical education curricula that provide training on LGBT healthcare are limited. The purpose of this study was to create and evaluate an LGBT curriculum for internal medicine (IM) residents. The implicit association test (IAT) measuring implicit bias toward gay individuals was administered as part of a needs assessment. The curriculum was developed by a multidisciplinary team, with objectives derived from the Association of American Medical Colleges' curricular recommendations and the Fenway Guide to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health. Surveys assessed residents' perceptions of the importance of primary care for LGBT patients, and their knowledge of and confidence in providing primary care to LGBT patients. Faculty also rated the usability of the curricular materials. The IAT showed a slight preference for straight people compared with gay people, with an average "D score" of 0.27 ± 0.42. The importance of receiving education about the primary care of LGB patients was rated as high across the pre- to postsurveys. Knowledge improved with participation in the curriculum (average overall score: 42% pre- vs. 66% postsurvey, p < 0.0001). Participants' confidence in their ability to provide information to LGBT patients about resources for community engagement and to implement gender-neutral practices in their clinics increased significantly (p < 0.05). This curriculum pilot demonstrated an improvement in IM residents' knowledge of and confidence in providing care to LGBT patients. Our results suggest that curricular materials can be developed by experts in LGBT health and utilized effectively by nonexpert faculty to increase residents' knowledge and confidence regarding LGBT healthcare.