GPER Agonist Research Articles

LNS8801: An enantiomerically pure agonist of the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor suitable for clinical development.

Estrogen effects in tissue are mediated in part through activation of the surface estrogen receptor GPER, a broadly expressed G protein-coupled receptor that impacts a wide range of normal and pathologic processes, including metabolism, vascular health, inflammation, and cancer. A commonly used synthetic and specific GPER agonist, named G-1, antagonizes tumors by promoting cellular differentiation and enhancing tumor immunogenicity. G-1 is a racemic compound, and since its discovery, the question of whether both enantiomers display agonist activity or the agonist activity resides primarily in a single enantiomer has never been fully resolved. Herein, we disclose the isolation of the pure enantiomers of G-1 and determine that the desirable activity resides exclusively in 1 enantiomer, named LNS8801, whose configuration we have unambiguously determined by single crystal x-ray structure analysis. Using preclinical models, we show that LNS8801 suppresses cancer in a GPER-dependent manner and that LNS8801 is efficacious when administered orally. Further, we show that GPER is widely, but not ubiquitously, expressed in both normal and malignant human tissues. In addition, an attenuated response to LNS8801 is observed in a common germline coding variant in human GPER. These findings support ongoing human cancer trials with LNS8801 and suggest that the germline GPER genotype may serve as a predictive biomarker of therapeutic response.

GPER1 activation by estrogenic compounds in the inflammatory profile of breast cancer cells

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent female neoplasm worldwide. Its establishment and development have been related to inflammatory cytokine expression. Steroid hormones such as estradiol (E2) can regulate proinflammatory cytokine secretion through interaction with its nuclear receptors. However, little is known regarding the activation of its membrane estrogen receptor (GPER1) and the inflammatory cytokine environment in BC. We have studied the synthesis and biological effects of molecules analogs to E2 for hormone replacement therapy (HRT), such as pentolame. Nevertheless, its interaction with GPER1 and the modulation of inflammatory cytokines in different BC types has been barely studied and deserves deeper investigation. In this research, the role of GPER1 in the proliferation and modulation of inflammatory cytokines involved in carcinogenesis and metastatic processes in different BC cell lines was assessed by binding to various compounds. To achieve this goal, the presence of GPER1 was identified in different BC cell lines. Subsequently, cell proliferation after exposure to E2, pentolame and GPER1 agonist, G1, was subsequently determined alone or in combination with the GPER1 antagonist, G15. Finally, the pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion derived from the supernatants of BC cells exposed to the previous treatments was also assessed. Interestingly, GPER1 activation or inhibition has significant effects on the cytokine regulation associated with invasion in BC. Notably, pentolame did not induce cell proliferation or increase the proinflammatory cytokine expression compared to E2 in BC cell lines. In addition, pentolame did not induce the presence of the cell adhesion molecule PECAM-1. In contrast, E2 treatment weakly induced the expression of PECAM-1 in MCF-7 and HCC1937 cells, and G1 treatment showed this effect only in MCF-7 cells. The results suggest that GPER1 might be a significant inflammatory modulator with angiogenic-related effects in BC cells. In addition, pentolame might represent an HRT alternative in patients with BC predisposition.

Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 is induced by tamoxifen and fulvestrant and modulates fulvestrant response in breast cancer cells.

Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) exerts varying effects on estrogen receptor alpha (ERα)-positive and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells. In ERα-positive cells, IGFBP-3 is antiproliferative and proapoptotic. In contrast, IGFBP-3 stimulates proliferation in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells via EGFR activation. To identify potential mechanisms that underlie the opposing effects of IGFBP-3 on these two breast cancer subtypes, IGFBP-3 expression was determined in cell line models of both ERα-positive breast cancer and TNBC, and cells were treated with antiestrogens tamoxifen and fulvestrant. MCF-7 and T-47D cells expressed low levels of IGFBP-3 when compared to MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells. MCF-7 cells with acquired resistance to the selective estrogen receptor degrader fulvestrant expressed high IGFBP-3 and MCF-7 cells with constitutive IGFBP-3 expression were fulvestrant resistant. IGFBP-3 expression was increased in all cell lines upon treatment with fulvestrant or the selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen and both fulvestrant and tamoxifen increased TNBC cell proliferation. Further, IGFBP-3 expression was increased by treatment with the GPER1 agonist G-1 and attenuated upon treatment with P17, a YAP/TAZ inhibitor. These data suggest that IGFBP-3 modulates breast cancer cells and is a mediator of breast cancer cell response to fulvestrant and tamoxifen.

G protein-coupled estrogen receptor activation attenuates cisplatin-induced CKD in C57BL/6 mice: An insight into sex-related differences

Gender contributes to differences in incidence and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) post-cisplatin therapy. This study aims at investigating the potential effect of G1 compound, a GPER agonist, on attenuating cisplatin-induced CKD. To induce CKD in male, intact female, and ovariectomized (OVX) mice, CKD was induced by injecting two cycles of 2.5 mg/kg cisplatin with a 16-day recovery period between cycles). G1 (50 or 100 μg/kg was administered daily for 6 weeks. Severity of renal damage was more pronounced in males than females. Interestingly, OVX resulted in renal damage that is non-significant compared to males and significantly higher than females. G1 improved renal function and blood flow as evidenced by reduction of serum creatinine and elevation of creatinine clearance, NO production, and reduction of ET1. This renoprotective effect could be attributed to its immunomodulatory effect regulated by TGF-β that shifted the balance to favor anti-inflammatory cytokine production (increased IL-10) rather than pro-inflammatory cytokines (decreased Th17 expression). Reduction of TGF-β activation also inhibited epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition that eventually ameliorated CKD development. Antioxidant potential of G1 has been demonstrated by upregulation of Nrf2 and subsequent antioxidant enzymes. These data suggest that G1 could be a promising therapeutic tool to attenuate CP-induced CKD.

Cardioprotective effects of GPER agonist in ovariectomized diabetic rats: reversing ER stress and structural changes

Cardioprotective effects of GPER agonist in ovariectomized diabetic rats: reversing ER stress and structural changes

GPER Stimulation Attenuates Cardiac Dysfunction in a Rat Model of Preeclampsia.

Preeclampsia poses a substantial clinical challenge, characterized by maternal hypertension, cardiac dysfunction, and persistent cardiovascular risks for both the mother and offspring. Despite the known roles of the estrogen receptor (GPER [G protein-coupled estrogen receptor]) in placental development, its impact on cardiovascular aspects within a preeclampsia animal model remains unexplored. We propose that G-1, a GPER agonist, could have the potential to regulate not only hypertension but also cardiac dysfunction in rats with preeclampsia. To explore the influence of G-1 on preeclampsia, we used the reduced uterine perfusion pressure (RUPP) model. RUPP rats were administered either G-1 (100 µg/kg per day) or hydralazine (25 mg/kg per day). We conducted echocardiography to probe the intricate cardiac effects of G-1. The RUPP rat model revealed signs of hypertension and cardiac dysfunction and alterations in gene and protein expression within placental and heart tissues. G-1 treatment reduced blood pressure and reversed cardiac dysfunction in rats with preeclampsia. In contrast, administration of the vasodilator hydralazine reduced blood pressure without an improvement in cardiac function. In addition, while G-1 treatment restored the levels of sFLT-1 (soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1) in RUPP rats, hydralazine did not normalize this antiangiogenic factor. The therapeutic intervention of G-1 significantly mitigated the cardiovascular dysfunction observed in the RUPP rat model of preeclampsia. This discovery underscores the broader significance of understanding GPER's role in the context of preeclampsia-related cardiovascular complications.

Activation of G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor 1 (GPER) Attenuates Obesity-Induced Asthma by Switching M1 Macrophages to M2 Macrophages.

The prevalence of obesity-induced asthma increases in women after menopause. We hypothesized that the increase in obese asthma in middle-aged women results from estrogen loss. In particular, we focused on the acute action of estrogen through the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER), previously known as GPR30. We investigated whether GPER activation ameliorates obesity-induced asthma with a high-fat diet (HFD) using G-1, the GPER agonist, and G-36, the GPER antagonist. Administration of G-1 (0.5 mg/kg) suppressed HFD-induced airway hypersensitivity (AHR), and increased immune cell infiltration, whereas G-36 co-treatment blocked it. Histological analysis showed that G-1 treatment inhibited HFD-induced inflammation, fibrosis, and mucus hypersecretion in a GPER-dependent manner. G-1 inhibited the HFD-induced rise in the mRNA levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the gonadal white adipose tissue and lungs, whereas G-36 co-treatment reversed this effect. G-1 increased anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages and inhibited the HFD-induced rise in pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages in the lungs. In addition, G-1 treatment reversed the HFD-induced increase in leptin expression and decrease in adiponectin expression in the lungs and gonadal white adipose tissue. The results suggest that activation of GPER could be a therapeutic option for obesity-induced asthma.

G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor-Mediated Anti-Inflammatory and Mucosal Healing Activity of a Trimethylpyridinol Analogue in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is characterized by abnormal immune responses, including elevated proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. This study presents the synthesis and anti-inflammatory evaluation of 2,4,5-trimethylpyridin-3-ol analogues, which exhibit dual inhibition of TNFα- and IL-6-induced inflammation. Analysis using in silico methods, including 3D shape-based target identification, modeling, and docking, identified G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER) as the molecular target for the most effective analogue, 6-26, which exhibits remarkable efficacy in ameliorating inflammation and restoring colonic mucosal integrity. This was further validated by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) assay results, which showed direct binding to GPER, and by the results showing that GPER knockdown abolished the inhibitory effects of 6-26 on TNFα and IL-6 actions. Notably, 6-26 displayed no cytotoxicity, unlike G1 and G15, a well-known GPER agonist and an antagonist, respectively, which induced necroptosis independently of GPER. These findings suggest that the GPER-selective compound 6-26 holds promise as a therapeutic candidate for IBD.

The G-Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor Selective Agonist G-1 Attenuates Cell Viability and Migration in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines.

The G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER; G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor 30, also known as GPR30) is a novel estrogen receptor and has emerged as a promising target for ovarian cancer. GPER, a seven-transmembrane receptor, suppresses cellular viability and migration in studied ovarian cancer cells. However, its impact on the fallopian tube, which is the potential origin of high-grade serous (HGSC) ovarian cancer, has not been addressed. This study was conducted to evaluate the relationship of GPER, ovarian cancer subtypes, i.e., high-grade serous cell lines (OV90 and OVCAR420), as well as the cell type that is the potential origin of HGSC ovarian cancer (i.e., the fallopian tube cell line FT190). The selective ligand assessed here is the agonist G-1, which was utilized in an in vitro study to characterize its effects on cellular viability and migration. As a result, this study has addressed the effect of a specific GPER agonist on cell viability, providing a better understanding of the effects of this compound on our diverse group of studied cell lines. Strikingly, attenuated cell proliferation and migration behaviors were observed in the presence of G-1. Thus, our in vitro study reveals the impact of the origin of HGSC ovarian cancers and highlights the GPER agonist G-1 as a potential therapy for ovarian cancer.

G protein-coupled estrogen receptor agonist G-1 decreases ADAM10 levels and NLRP3-inflammasome component activation in response to Staphylococcus aureus alpha-hemolysin.

The G protein-coupled estrogen receptor, also known as GPER1 or originally GPR30, is found in various tissues, indicating its diverse functions. It is typically present in immune cells, suggesting its role in regulating immune responses to infectious diseases. Our previous studies have shown that G-1, a selective GPER agonist, can limit the pathogenesis mediated by Staphylococcus aureus alpha-hemolysin (Hla). It aids in clearing bacteria in a mouse skin infection model and restricts the surface display of the Hla receptor, ADAM10 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease 10) in HaCaT keratinocytes. In this report, we delve into the modulation of GPER in human immune cells in relation to the NLRP3 inflammasome. We used macrophage-like differentiated THP-1 cells for our study. We found that treating these cells with G-1 reduces ATP release, decreases the activity of the caspase-1 enzyme, and lessens cell death following Hla intoxication. This is likely due to the reduced levels of ADAM10 and NLRP3 proteins, as well as the decreased display of the ADAM10 receptor in the G-1-treated THP-1 cells. Our studies, along with our previous work, suggest the potential therapeutic use of G-1 in reducing Hla susceptibility in humans. This highlights the importance of GPER in immune regulation and its potential as a therapeutic target.

Roles of estrogen receptors during sexual reversal in Pelodiscus sinensis.

The Chinese soft-shelled turtle, Pelodiscus sinensis, exhibits distinct sexual dimorphism, with the males growing faster and larger than the females. During breeding, all-male offspring can be obtained using 17β-estradiol (E2). However, the molecular mechanisms underlying E2-induced sexual reversal have not yet been elucidated. Previous studies have investigated the molecular sequence and expression characteristics of estrogen receptors (ERs). In this study, primary liver cells and embryos of P. sinensis were treated with ER agonists or inhibitors. Cell incubation experiments revealed that nuclear ERs (nERs) were the main pathway for the transmission of estrogen signals. Our results showed that ERα agonist (ERα-ag) upregulated the expression of Rspo1, whereas ERα inhibitor (ERα-Inh) downregulated its expression. The expression of Dmrt1 was enhanced after ERα-Inh + G-ag treatment, indicating that the regulation of male genes may not act through a single estrogen receptor, but a combination of ERs. In embryos, only the ERα-ag remarkably promoted the expression levels of Rspo1, Wnt4, and β-catenin, whereas the ERα-Inh had a suppressive effect. Additionally, Dmrt1, Amh, and Sox9 expression levels were downregulated after ERβ inhibitor (ERβ-Inh) treatment. GPER agonist (G-ag) has a significant promotion effect on Rspo1, Wnt4, and β-catenin, while the inhibitor G-Inh does not affect male-related genes. Overall, these results suggest that ERs play different roles during sexual reversal in P. sinensis and ERα may be the main carrier of estrogen-induced sexual reversal in P. sinensis. Further studies need to be performed to analyze the mechanism of ER action.

G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 promotes peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer through nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide kinase 1-mediated redox modulation.

Adipose tissue is the second most important site of estrogen production, where androgens are converted into estrogen by aromatase. While gastric cancer patients often develop adipocyte-rich peritoneal metastasis, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. In this study, we identified the G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER1) as a promoter of gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis. Functional invitro studies revealed that β-Estradiol (E2) or the GPER1 agonist G1 inhibited anoikis in gastric cancer cells. Additionally, genetic overexpression or knockout of GPER1 significantly inhibited or enhanced gastric cancer cell anoikis invitro and peritoneal metastasis invivo, respectively. Mechanically, GPER1 knockout disrupted the NADPH pool and increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. Conversely, overexpression of GPER1 had the opposite effects. GPER1 suppressed nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide kinase 1(NADK1) ubiquitination and promoted its phosphorylation, which were responsible for the elevated expression of NADK1 at protein levels and activity, respectively. Moreover, genetic inhibition of NADK1 disrupted NADPH and redox homeostasis, leading to high levels of ROS and significant anoikis, which inhibited lung and peritoneal metastasis in cell-based xenograft models. In summary, our study suggests that inhibiting GPER1-mediated NADK1 activity and its ubiquitination may be a promising therapeutic strategy for peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer.

GPER Acts Through the cAMP/Epac/JNK/AP-1 Pathway to Induce Transcription of Alpha 2C Adrenoceptor in Human Microvascular Smooth Muscle Cells.

Raynaud's phenomenon, which results from exaggerated cold-induced vasoconstriction, is more prevalent in females than males. We previously showed that estrogen increases the expression of alpha 2C-adrenoceptors (α 2C -AR), the sole mediator of cold-induced vasoconstriction. This effect of estrogen is reproduced by the cell-impermeable form of the hormone (E 2 :bovine serum albumin [BSA]), suggesting a role of the membrane estrogen receptor, G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor [GPER], in E 2 -induced α 2C -AR expression. We also previously reported that E 2 upregulates α 2C -AR in microvascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) via the cAMP/Epac/Rap/JNK/AP-1 pathway, and that E 2 :BSA elevates cAMP levels. We, therefore, hypothesized that E 2 uses GPER to upregulate α 2C -AR through the cAMP/Epac/JNK/AP-1 pathway. Our results show that G15, a selective GPER antagonist, attenuates the E 2 -induced increase in α 2C -AR transcription. G-1, a selective GPER agonist, induced α 2C -AR transcription, which was concomitant with elevated cAMP levels and JNK activation. Pretreatment with ESI09, an Epac inhibitor, abolished G-1-induced α 2C -AR upregulation and JNK activation. Moreover, pretreatment with SP600125, a JNK-specific inhibitor, but not H89, a PKA-specific inhibitor, abolished G-1-induced α 2C -AR upregulation. In addition, transient transfection of an Epac dominant negative mutant (Epac-DN) attenuated G-1-induced activation of the α 2C -AR promoter. This inhibitory effect of Epac-DN on the α 2C -AR promoter was overridden by the cotransfection of constitutively active JNK mutant. Furthermore, mutation of AP-1 site in the α 2C -AR promoter abrogated G1-induced expression. Collectively, these results indicate that GPER upregulates α 2C -AR through the cAMP/EPAC/JNK/AP-1 pathway. These findings unravel GPER as a new mediator of cold-induced vasoconstriction, and present it as a potential target for treating Raynaud's phenomenon in estrogen-replete females.

Estradiol mitigates stress-induced cardiac injury and inflammation by downregulating ADAM17 via the GPER-1/PI3K signaling pathway

Stress-induced cardiovascular diseases characterized by inflammation are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in postmenopausal women worldwide. Estradiol (E2) is known to be cardioprotective via the modulation of inflammatory mediators during stress. But the mechanism is unclear. TNFα, a key player in inflammation, is primarily converted to its active form by 'A Disintegrin and Metalloprotease 17' (ADAM17). We investigated if E2 can regulate ADAM17 during stress. Experiments were performed using female FVB wild-type (WT), C57BL/6 WT, and G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 knockout (GPER-1 KO) mice and H9c2 cells. The study revealed a significant increase in cardiac injury and inflammation during isoproterenol (ISO)-induced stress in ovariectomized (OVX) mice. Additionally, ADAM17’s membrane content (mADAM17) was remarkably increased in OVX and GPER-1 KO mice during stress. However, in vivo supplementation of E2 significantly reduced cardiac injury, mADAM17, and inflammation. Also, administering G1 (GPER-1 agonist) in mice under stress reduced mADAM17. Further experiments demonstrated that E2, via GPER-1/PI3K pathway, localized ADAM17 at the perinuclear region by normalizing β1AR-Gαs, mediating the switch from β2AR-Gαi to Gαs, and reducing phosphorylated kinases, including p38 MAPKs and ERKs. Thus, using G15 and LY294002 to inhibit GPER-1 and its down signaling molecule, PI3K, respectively, in the presence of E2 during stress resulted in the disappearance of E2’s modulatory effect on mADAM17. In vitro knockdown of ADAM17 during stress significantly reduced cardiac injury and inflammation, confirming its significant inflammatory role. These interesting findings provide novel evidence that E2 and G1 are potential therapeutic agents for ADAM17-induced inflammatory diseases associated with postmenopausal females.

The G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor, a gene co-expressed with ERα in breast tumors, is regulated by estrogen-ERα signalling in ERα positive breast cancer cells

GPER is a seven transmembrane G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor that mediates rapid estrogen actions. Large volumes of data have revealed its association with clinicopathological variables in breast tumors, role in epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like effects of estrogen, potential as a therapeutic target or a prognostic marker, and involvement in endocrine resistance in the face of tamoxifen agonism. GPER cross-talks with estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in cell culture models implicating its role in the physiology of normal or transformed mammary epithelial cells. However, discrepancies in the literature have obfuscated the nature of their relationship, its significance, and the underlying mechanism. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between GPER, and ERα in breast tumors, to understand the mechanistic basis, and to gauge its clinical significance. We mined The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-BRCA data to examine the relationship between GPER and ERα expression. GPER mRNA, and protein expression were analyzed in ERα-positive or -negative breast tumors from two independent cohorts using immunohistochemistry, western blotting, or RT-qPCR. The Kaplan-Meier Plotter (KM) was employed for survival analysis. The influence of estrogen in vivo was studied by examining GPER expression levels in estrus or diestrus mouse mammary tissues, and the impact of 17β-estradiol (E2) administration in juvenile or adult mice. The effect of E2, or propylpyrazoletriol (PPT, an ERα agonist) stimulation on GPER expression was studied in MCF-7 and T47D cells, with or without tamoxifen or ERα knockdown. ERα-binding to the GPER locus was explored by analysing ChIP-seq data (ERP000380), in silico prediction of estrogen response elements, and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay. Clinical data revealed significant positive association between GPER and ERα expression in breast tumors. The median GPER expression in ERα-positive tumors was significantly higher than ERα-negative tumors. High GPER expression was significantly associated with longer overall survival (OS) of patients with ERα-positive tumors. In vivo experiments showed a positive effect of E2 on GPER expression. E2 induced GPER expression in MCF-7 and T47D cells; an effect mimicked by PPT. Tamoxifen or ERα-knockdown blocked the induction of GPER. Estrogen-mediated induction was associated with increased ERα occupancy in the upstream region of GPER. Furthermore, treatment with 17β-estradiol or PPT significantly reduced the IC50 of the GPER agonist (G1)-mediated loss of MCF-7 or T47D cell viability. In conclusion, GPER is positively associated with ERα in breast tumors, and induced by estrogen-ERα signalling axis. Estrogen-mediated induction of GPER makes the cells more responsive to GPER ligands. More in-depth studies are warranted to establish the significance of GPER-ERα co-expression, and their interplay in breast tumor development, progression, and treatment.

G protein-coupled estrogen receptor in GtoPdb v.2023.1

The G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER, nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor [26]) was identified following observations of estrogen-evoked cyclic AMP signalling in breast cancer cells [2], which mirrored the differential expression of an orphan 7-transmembrane receptor GPR30 [6]. There are observations of both cell-surface and intracellular expression of the GPER receptor [29, 34]. Selective agonist/ antagonists for GPER have been characterized [26]. Antagonists of the nuclear estrogen receptor, such as fulvestrant [11], tamoxifen [29, 34] and raloxifene [25], as well as the flavonoid 'phytoestrogens' genistein and quercetin [18], are agonists of GPER. Reviews of GPER pharmacology have been published [26]. The roles of GPER in (patho)physiological systems throughout the body (cardiovascular, metabolic, endocrine, immune, reproductive) and in cancer have also been reviewed [26, 27, 20, 17, 9]. The GPER-selective agonist G-1 is currently in Phase I/II clinical trials for cancer (NCT04130516).

The GPER Agonist LNS8801 Induces Mitotic Arrest and Apoptosis in Uveal Melanoma Cells.

Current treatments against metastatic uveal melanoma have shown limited clinical activity and there is an urgent need for effective therapies. Here, we demonstrate that the GPER agonist LNS8801 induced both GPER-dependent and GPER-independent effects and elicited potent anticancer activities in vitro and in vivo. Our results complement and support the ongoing clinical trial of LNS8801 in advanced uveal melanoma.

Bisphenol A and bisphenol S both disrupt ovine granulosa cell steroidogenesis but through different molecular pathways

BackgroundOvarian granulosa cells (GC) are essential for the development and maturation of a proper oocyte. GC are sensitive to endocrine disruptors, including bisphenol A (BPA) and its analogue bisphenol S (BPS), plasticisers present in everyday consumer products. BPA exhibits greater binding affinity for the membrane oestrogen receptor (GPER) than for the nuclear oestrogen receptors (ERα and ERβ). Here, we analysed the effects of BPA and BPS on the steroidogenesis of ovine GC in vitro, as well as their early mechanisms of action, the ovine being a relevant model to study human reproductive impairment. Disruption of GC steroidogenesis might alter oocyte quality and consequently fertility rate. In addition, we compared the effects of a specific GPER agonist (G-1) and antagonist (G-15) to those of BPA and BPS. Ewe GC were cultured with BPA or BPS (10 or 50 µM) or G-1 (1 µM) and/or G-15 (10 µM) for 48 h to study steroidogenesis.ResultsBoth BPA and BPS (10 µM) altered the secretion of progesterone, however, only BPS (10 µM) affected oestradiol secretion. RNA-seq was performed on GC after 1 h of culture with BPA or BPS (50 µM) or G-1 (10 µM), followed by real-time PCR analyses of differentially expressed genes after 12, 24 and 48 h of culture. The absence of induced GPER target genes showed that BPA and BPS did not activate GPER in GC after 1 h of treatment. These molecules exhibited mainly independent early mechanisms of action. Gene ontology analysis showed that after 1 h of treatment, BPA mainly disrupted the expression of the genes involved in metabolism and transcription, while BPS had a smaller effect and impaired cellular communications. BPA had a transient effect on the expression of CHAC1 (NOTCH signalling and oxidative balance), JUN (linked to MAPK pathway), NR4A1 (oestradiol secretion inhibition), ARRDC4 (endocytose of GPCR) and KLF10 (cell growth, differentiation and apoptosis), while expression changes were maintained over time for the genes LSMEM1 (linked to MAPK pathway), TXNIP (oxidative stress) and LIF (cell cycle regulation) after 12 and 48 h, respectively.ConclusionIn conclusion, although they exhibited similar effects, BPA and BPS impaired different molecular pathways in GC in vitro. New investigations will be necessary to follow the temporal changes of these genes over time, as well as the biological processes involved.

G-protein coupled estrogen receptor (GPER1) activation promotes synaptic insertion of AMPA receptors and induction of chemical LTP at hippocampal temporoammonic-CA1 synapses

It is well documented that 17β estradiol (E2) regulates excitatory synaptic transmission at hippocampal Shaffer-collateral (SC)-CA1 synapses, via activation of the classical estrogen receptors (ERα and ERβ). Hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons are also innervated by the temporoammonic (TA) pathway, and excitatory TA-CA1 synapses are reported to be regulated by E2. Recent studies suggest a role for the novel G-protein coupled estrogen receptor (GPER1) at SC-CA1 synapses, however, the role of GPER1 in mediating the effects of E2 at juvenile TA-CA1 synapses is unclear. Here we demonstrate that the GPER1 agonist, G1 induces a persistent, concentration-dependent (1–10 nM) increase in excitatory synaptic transmission at TA-CA1 synapses and this effect is blocked by selective GPER1 antagonists. The ability of GPER1 to induce this novel form of chemical long-term potentiation (cLTP) was prevented following blockade of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, and it was not accompanied by any change in paired pulse facilitation ratio (PPR). GPER1-induced cLTP involved activation of ERK but was independent of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signalling. Prior treatment with philanthotoxin prevented the effects of G1, indicating that synaptic insertion of GluA2-lacking α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors underlies GPER1-induced cLTP. Furthermore, activity-dependent LTP occluded G1‐induced cLTP and vice versa, indicating that these processes have overlapping expression mechanisms. Activity‐dependent LTP was blocked by the GPER1 antagonist, G15, suggesting that GPER1 plays a role in NMDA‐dependent LTP at juvenile TA‐CA1 synapses. These findings add a new dimension to our understanding of GPER1 in modulating neuronal plasticity with relevance to age-related neurodegenerative conditions.

Molecular Characterization of the Dual Effect of the GPER Agonist G-1 in Glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor in adults. Despite conventional treatment, consisting of a chirurgical resection followed by concomitant radio-chemotherapy, the 5-year survival rate is less than 5%. Few risk factors are clearly identified, but women are 1.4-fold less affected than men, suggesting that hormone and particularly estrogen signaling could have protective properties. Indeed, a high GPER1 (G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor) expression is associated with better survival, especially in women who produce a greater amount of estrogen. Therefore, we addressed the anti-tumor effect of the GPER agonist G-1 in vivo and characterized its molecular mechanism of action in vitro. First, the antiproliferative effect of G-1 was confirmed in a model of xenografted nude mice. A transcriptome analysis of GBM cells exposed to G-1 was performed, followed by functional analysis of the differentially expressed genes. Lipid and steroid synthesis pathways as well as cell division processes were both affected by G-1, depending on the dose and duration of the treatment. ANGPTL4, the first marker of G-1 exposure in GBM, was identified and validated in primary GBM cells and patient samples. These data strongly support the potential of G-1 as a promising chemotherapeutic compound for the treatment of GBM.