Conflict over issues of land use in northern Madagascar reveals that political is situational and that rights to resources are ambiguous. In two cases, local farmers, regional royal indigenous leader, and international conservationists struggled to establish and maintain ability to use and manage forested land to west of Ankarana massif. Political provides a theoretical framework for exploring complex political negotiations that are an integral part of all ecological interactions. In recognizing complexity of such interactions, applied attempts to address issues of environmental degradation and disenfranchisement may also become more effective. (Madagascar, political ecology, conservation, conflict) The protected forest of Ankarana Special Reserve, in northern Madagascar, has a history of local tensions over who possesses rights to land use and under what circumstances. Effective over land use is situational more than it is predetermined or consistently executed according to a set standard. The cases reported here reveal land- and resource-use rights to be ambiguous, overlapping, and even contradictory. Examining cases of conflict shows theoretical interdependence of political and ecological analyses by considering how people with different interests and access to power continuously negotiate rights to manage and use environment of Ankarana region. Political ecology, an interdisciplinary approach that incorporates political economy and cultural into one frame of analysis, provides a useful perspective for studying complex dynamics of human interactions with environment. By focusing on links between local, national, and international contexts, scholars have shown that ecological relationships extend beyond local geographical and political boundaries (Campbell and Olson 1991; Grossman 1993; Moore 1993; Jarosz 1993; Sanabria 1993) and that social differentiation is an important factor in resource management, as some possess greater rights to access and manage resources than others (Carney 1993; Schroeder 1993; Johnston 1994; Bryant 1995; Rocheleau et al. 1996). This article contributes to political by focusing on textured analyses of multilevel political interactions and processes, showing their relationship to regulation of and use of biophysical environment. While quantitative analyses have frequently been considered benchmark of studies in ecological anthropology, detailed qualitative analyses of micropolitics and sociocultural processes also reveal important aspects of patterns of human interaction with biophysical environment. Geographers Richard Peet and Michael Watts (1994:240) note the absence of serious treatment of politics in political ecology and call for qualitative studies integrating political action--whether everyday resistance, civic movements, or organized party politics--into questions of resource access and control (Peet and Watts 1994:240). Vayda (1983:271) also points out limitations of quantitative methodologies and advocates methods with a fluidity or flexibility to match that of things and processes we were trying to understand. The following analysis examines cases of conflict to gain insight into how different actors and authorities (the politicoreligious leader, people living on periphery of forest, and conservation organization in tandem with government of Madagascar) vie for access to forested land. Understandings in political go beyond theoretical relevance in their ability to suggest forms of resource management which take into account complexity of political and economic interactions. As Vayda (1983) suggests, ecological writings are most useful if they address some of concerns of policymakers as well as those of academics. …
Read full abstract