Introduction: Temporary Gastric Electrical Stimulation (tGES) alleviates the symptoms of gastroparesis (GP) and most patients who have tGES undergo permanent (pGES) device implantation. We previously reported on the use of tGES via PEG or endoscopy (GIE, 2005 61: 455-6) as well as endoscopic tGES in a large number of pts (GIE, 2006:63; 5, AB103.). We now report on the use of mucosal EGG as a predictor of response to temporary and permanent GES. Patients: Of 394 consecutive patients (74 m, 274 f, mean age 43 years) from our regional database, we examined 150 patients who underwent tGES followed by pGES, and who also had mucosal EGG performed at the time of tGES: with diagnosis: idiopathic (I, 88), diabetic (D, 40), post surgical (PS, 22). Methods: Temporary GES was performed as previously reported (above) and if successful, was followed by permanent GES. During follow-up (10 months to 5 ½ years), of patients responding to tGES, symptom outcome was correlated with pGES. Patients were assessed by symptom scores [nausea (N), vomiting (V), and total symptom (TSS)] and IDIOMS (a HRQOL measure) at baseline (b), after tGES (t) and at the latest (L) available follow-up. The ratio of frequency to amplitude ratio in tGES mucosal electrogastrograms (Rt) was assessed in all patients undergoing tGES. Using linear regression, with latest vomiting score as the dependent variable, we determined the independent variables that predicted this outcome. Results: In subset analysis by etiology, virtually all patients I (p < 0.0001) DM (p ≤ 0.0001), and PS (p ≤ 0.001) had very good responses in all assessed scores and IDIOMS to both tGES and pGES. Among all categories of GP, linear regression analysis identified a low Rt derived by the use of mEGG as the single best predictor of response to tGES and pGES. Other predictors of improvement in vomiting score after pGES: patient age, [Age ALL: t (p) -2.49 (0.01); I: t (p)-1.86 (0.06); D: t (p) -1.2 (0.23); PS: t (p) 0.28 (0.78)] and baseline vomiting score [Vb ALL: t (p) 3.5 (< 0.001); I: t (p) 3.23 (0.001); D: t (p) 1.79 (0.08); PS: t (p) 1.04 (0.31)]. In subset analysis, the above predictors were most significant for ID. Conclusions: Endoscopic mucosal EGG derived Rt, may be predictive of response to GES, especially improvement in vomiting, for certain GP patients. The lack of significance in D and PS groups may be due to a smaller sample size. Further trials of this diagnostic test can refine its exact role in the selection of GP patients for stimulation therapies. Tabled 1 INDEPENDENT ALL IDIOPATHIC DIABETIC POST-SURGICAL t-stat. (p)value t- (p) t- (p) t- (p) Rt 2.87 (< 0.005) 2.76 (0.007) -0.44 (0.66) 1.08 (0.3) Open table in a new tab