Optic Nerve Regeneration In Goldfish Research Articles

Involvement of retinoic acid signaling in goldfish optic nerve regeneration

Recently, we identified a retina-specific retinol-binding protein, purpurin, as a trigger molecule in the early stage of goldfish optic nerve regeneration. Purpurin protein was secreted by photoreceptors to injured ganglion cells, at 2–5 days after optic nerve injury. Purpurin bound to retinol induced neurite outgrowth in retinal explant cultures and retinoic acid (RA) had a comparable effect on neurite outgrowth. These results indicate that purpurin acts as a retinol transporter and facilitates conversion of retinol to RA. Intracellularly, RA is transported into the nucleus with cellular retinoic acid-binding protein IIb (CRABPIIb) and binds with retinoic acid receptor α (RARα) as a transcriptional regulator of target genes. Here, we investigated the RA signaling through RA synthesis to RARα in the goldfish retina during optic nerve regeneration by RT-PCR. Retinaldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (RALDH2; an RA synthetic enzyme) mRNA was increased by 2.7-fold in the retina at 7–10 days and then gradually decreased until 40 days after nerve injury. In contrast, cytochrome P450 26a1 (CYP26a1; an RA degradative enzyme) mRNA was decreased to less than half in the retina at 5–20 days and then gradually returned to the control level by 40 days after nerve injury. CRABPIIb mRNA was increased by 1.5-fold in the retina at 10 days after axotomy, RARαa mRNA was increased by 1.8-fold in the retina at 10 days after axotomy. The cellular changes in the RA signaling molecules after optic nerve injury were almost all located in the ganglion cells, as evaluated by in situ hybridization. The present data described for the first time that RA signaling through RALDH2 and CRABPIIb to RARα was serially upregulated in the ganglion cells at 7–10 days just after the purpurin induction. Therefore, we conclude that the triggering action of purpurin on optic nerve regeneration is mediated by RA signaling pathway.

Upregulation of retinal transglutaminase during the axonal elongation stage of goldfish optic nerve regeneration

Fish CNS neurons can repair their axons following nerve injury, whereas mammalian CNS neurons cannot regenerate, and become apoptotic within 1–2 weeks after the nerve lesion. One explanation for these differences is that one, or several molecules are upregulated in fish CNS neurons during nerve regeneration, and this same molecule is downregulated in mammalian CNS neurons before the development of apoptosis caused by nerve injury. A molecule satisfying these criteria might successfully rescue and repair the mammalian CNS neurons. In this study, we looked for such a candidate molecule from goldfish retinas. Transglutaminase derived from goldfish retina (TG R) was characterized as a regenerating molecule after optic nerve injury. A full-length cDNA for TG R was isolated from the goldfish retinal cDNA library prepared from axotomized retinas. Levels of TG R mRNA and protein increased only in the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) between 10 and 40 days after optic nerve transection. Recombinant TG R protein enhanced neurite outgrowth from adult fish RGCs in culture. Specific interference RNA and antibodies for TG R inhibited neurite outgrowth both in vitro and in vivo. In contrast, the level of TG R protein decreased in rat RGCs within 1–3 days after nerve injury. Furthermore, the addition of recombinant TG R to retinal cultures induced striking neurite outgrowth from adult rat RGCs. These molecular and cellular data strongly suggest that TG R promotes axonal elongation at the surface of injured RGCs after optic nerve injury.

CAMP regulates axon outgrowth and guidance during optic nerve regeneration in goldfish

Increased cAMP improves neuronal survival and axon regeneration in mammals. Here, we assess cAMP levels and identify activated pathways in a spontaneously regenerating central nervous system. Following optic nerve crush in goldfish, almost all retinal ganglion cells (RGC) survive and regenerate retinotectal topography. Goldfish received injections of a cAMP analogue (CPT-cAMP), a protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor (KT5720), both compounds combined, or PBS (control). RGC survival in experimental groups was unaffected at any stage. The rate of axon regeneration was accelerated by the activator and decelerated both by the inhibitor and by combined injections, suggesting a PKA-dependent pathway. In addition, errors in regenerate retinotectal topography were observed when agents were applied in vivo and RGC response to the guidance cue ephrin-A5 in vitro was altered by the inhibitor. Our results highlight that therapeutic manipulation of cAMP levels to enhance axonal regeneration in mammals must ensure that topography, and consequently function, is not disrupted.

Characterisation of tectal ephrin-A2 expression during optic nerve regeneration in goldfish: implications for restoration of topography

EphA receptors and their ligands the ephrin-As, expressed as retinal and tectal gradients, are required for the development of retino-tectal topography [Neuron 25 (2000) 563] and its restoration during goldfish optic nerve regeneration [Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 25 (2004) 56]. We have reported previously that, during regeneration, a transient EphA3/A5 gradient is formed by differential expression across the entire retinal ganglion cell (RGC) population [Neurosci. Abs. 33 (2003) 358.2; Exp. Neurol. 183 (2003) 593]. In retino-recipient tectal layers, ephrin-A2 is normally expressed by only a sub-population of cells, but during regeneration, there is a graded increase with more expressing cells caudally than rostrally [Exp. Neurol. 166 (2000) 196]. Here, we examine the characteristics of tectal ephrin-A2 expression during regeneration. We report that the level of ephrin-A2 expression is comparable for all ephrin-A2-positive cells in normal animals and during regeneration. Using double-labelling immunohistochemistry for ephrin-A2 and specific cell markers (NeuN for neurons, GA5 for astrocytes, NN-1 for microglia/endothelial cells and 6D2 for oligodendrocytes), we demonstrate that ephrin-A2-expressing cells, as in normal animals, are exclusively neuronal. Moreover, double labelling with BrdU showed that ephrin-A2 is expressed in resident cells and not those generated during optic nerve regeneration [Brain Res. 854 (2000) 178, 153 (1978) 345].

Axonal regeneration of fish optic nerve after injury.

Since Sperry's work in the 1950s, it has been known that the central nervous system (CNS) neurons of lower vertebrates such as fish and amphibians can regenerate after axotomy, whereas the CNS neurons of mammals become apoptotic after axotomy. The goldfish optic nerve (ON) is one of the most studied animal models of CNS regeneration. Morphological changes in the goldfish retina and tectum after ON transection were first researched in the 1970s-1980s. Many biochemical studies of neurite outgrowth-promoting substances were then carried out in the 1980s-1990s. Many factors have been reported to be active substances that show increased levels during fish ON regeneration, as shown by using various protein chemistry techniques. However, there are very few molecular cloning techniques for studying ON regeneration after injury. In this review article, we summarize the neurite outgrowth-promoting factors reported by other researchers and describe our strategies for searching for ON regenerating molecules using a differential hybridization technique in the goldfish visual system. The process of goldfish ON regeneration after injury is very long. It takes about half a year from the start of axonal regrowth to complete restoration of vision. The process has been classified into three stages: early, middle and late. We screened for genes with increased expression during regeneration using axotomized goldfish retinal and tectal cDNA libraries and obtained stage-specific cDNA clones that were upregulated in the retina and tectum. We further discuss functional roles of these molecules in the regeneration processes of goldfish ON.

Transient up-regulation of retinal EphA3 and EphA5, but not ephrin-A2, coincides with re-establishment of a topographic map during optic nerve regeneration in goldfish

Eph tyrosine kinase receptors and their ligands, the ephrins, play a key role in the establishment of retinotectal topography during development. Tectal up-regulation of ephrin-A2 in goldfish, coincident with the reestablishment of a retinotectal map, suggests a similar role during optic nerve regeneration (Rodger et al., 2000). Here we report a complementary study of EphA3, EphA5 and ephrin-A2 expression in the retina. EphA3 and EphA5 are transiently up-regulated as ascending naso-temporal gradients, whereas ephrin-A2 remains uniform. The expression profiles differ from those in developing chick and mouse, suggesting that different combinations of retinal Eph receptors and ligands can generate topographic guidance information.

Sequential recovery of sensitivity to negative and positive contrasts during optic nerve regeneration in goldfish.

A psychophysical procedure, classical conditioning of respiration, was used to measure contrast sensitivity to positive- and negative-contrast discs (8-deg diameter) in goldfish after crushing one optic nerve intraorbitally. In five out of six fish, sensitivity recovered to normal. Recovery times for negative contrasts were significantly shorter than for positive contrasts. The average times postcrush of initial responding to negative and positive contrasts were 23.8 and 30.6 days, and for threshold to come within 0.5 log unit of control values was 29.8 and 39.8 days, respectively. Thereafter, recovery to normal sensitivity was significantly faster for positive contrasts. These results parallel prior observations of neural activity in tectum after optic nerve crush: an early phase of OFF responding followed by a more sudden recovery of ON responding.

Transient Up-Regulation of the Rostrocaudal Gradient of Ephrin A2 in the Tectum Coincides with Reestablishment of Orderly Projections during Optic Nerve Regeneration in Goldfish

During development, a graded expression of ephrin A2 has been implicated in retinotectal map formation. Here we have examined ephrin A2 expression during optic nerve regeneration in the mature goldfish. In the tecta of normal animals, a gradient of ephrin A2 expression is detected in cell bodies within the stratum fibrosum et griseum superficiale with more immunopositive cells caudally than rostrally. The gradient in the mature animal presumably reflects the plasticity associated with continued retinal and tectal neurogenesis. During optic nerve regeneration, expression throughout the tectum is increased by 1 month as a strong rostrocaudal gradient. The gradient declines to normal by 3 months. The up-regulation of ephrin A2 during optic nerve regeneration is likely to be instrumental in reestablishing the retinotectal map.

A vulnerable period of colchicine toxicity during goldfish optic nerve regeneration

The effects of intraocular (i.o.) administration of the alkaloid colchicine on visual recovery following axotomy of the goldfish optic nerve were investigated. Under the experimental conditions used, control goldfish recovered vision, measured behaviorally, within 5-7 weeks of retro-orbital optic nerve crush. Fish injected i. o. with 0.1 microg of colchicine within 3 days of optic nerve crush (post-crush; PC) recovered vision after some delay relative to control fish, while injection with colchicine between 7 and 14 days PC produced a much more profound inhibition of recovery of vision, in most cases a complete block for the duration of the study (98 days). Further evidence for a delayed susceptibility of the regenerating optic nerve to colchicine following crush was reflected in a suppression of neurite outgrowth normally seen in explanted retinal tissue taken from PC goldfish. In addition, retrograde transport of the fluorescent dye 4-(4-didecylaminostyryl)-N-methylpyridinium iodide from the optic tectum to the retina as a measure of axonal continuity revealed substantially less labeling following i.o. administration of colchicine 1 week PC when compared to retinas from fish receiving colchicine at the time of optic nerve crush. Histological sections of the retina showed no evidence of residual retinal damage resulting from the colchicine injections or from interactions of axotomy and the drug administration. These results indicate a period of increased vulnerability of the regenerating visual system to the toxic effects of i.o. administered colchicine, beginning 3-5 days PC, and remaining until regenerating optic nerve fibers have begun to reach the tectum. While colchicine has many known effects on nerve function, it is proposed that the delayed susceptibility to disruption of regeneration observed in these experiments is largely, if not entirely, attributable to a colchicine-induced accumulation of tubulin heterodimers, which are known to block microtubule assembly and to participate in a feedback inhibition of tubulin synthesis. Thus, it is during the maximal induction of tubulin synthesis and of microtubule formation which normally occurs several days following axotomy that colchicine has its greatest effect. The results suggest that colchicine may be especially neurotoxic during neural development and regeneration.

Cloning and characterization of zRICH, a 2',3'-cyclic-nucleotide 3'-phosphodiesterase induced during zebrafish optic nerve regeneration.

We previously reported cloning of cDNAs encoding both components of a protein doublet induced during goldfish optic nerve regeneration. The predicted protein sequences showed significant homology with the mammalian 2',3'-cyclic-nucleotide 3'-phosphodiesterases (CNPases). CNPases are well-established markers of mammalian myelin; hence, the cDNAs were designated gRICH68 and gRICH70 (for goldfish Regeneration-Induced CNPase Homologues of 68 and 70 kDa). Homologous cDNAs have now been isolated from zebrafish encoding a highly related protein, which we have termed zRICH. RNase protection assays show that zRICH mRNA is induced significantly (fivefold) in optic nerve regenerating zebrafish retinas 7 days following nerve crush. Western blots show a single band in zebrafish brain and retina extracts, with immunoreactivity increasing three-fold in regenerating retinas 21 days postcrush. Immunohistochemical analysis indicated that this increase in zRICH protein expression is localized to the retinal ganglion cell layer in regenerating retina. We have characterized and evaluated the relevance of a conserved beta-ketoacyl synthase motif in zRICH to CNPase activity by means of site-directed mutagenesis. Two residues within the motif, H334 and T336, are critical for enzymatic activity. A cysteine residue within the motif, which corresponds to a critical residue for beta-ketoacyl synthase, does not appear to participate in the phosphodiesterase activity.

GRICH68 and gRICH70 Are 2′,3′-Cyclic-nucleotide 3′-Phosphodiesterases Induced during Goldfish Optic Nerve Regeneration

Biochemical characterization of changes in gene expression that accompany optic nerve regeneration has led to the identification of proteins that may play key roles in the regeneration process. In this report, a cDNA encoding gRICH70, a novel isoform of the regeneration-induced gRICH68 protein, has been identified and characterized in goldfish. Both gRICH68 and gRICH70 show significant homology (34-36%) to mammalian 2',3'-cyclic-nucleotide 3'-phosphodiesterases (CNPases), hence the name goldfish regeneration-induced CNPase homolog (gRICH). The predicted 431-amino acid gRICH70 protein is 88% homologous to gRICH68, and the retinal mRNA for gRICH70 is coordinately induced with gRICH68 mRNA during optic nerve regeneration. Enzymatic analysis of recombinant proteins confirms that both gRICH proteins possess CNPase activity. Despite the relatively limited sequence homology, the kinetic constants obtained suggest that both gRICH proteins are at least as efficient as recombinant mouse CNP1 in catalyzing the hydrolysis of 2',3'-cAMP. Immunoprecipitation studies indicate that gRICH proteins are responsible for the majority of the CNPase activity detected in regenerating goldfish retinas. The evidence presented demonstrates that gRICH68 and gRICH70 correspond to a previously described doublet of acidic proteins that are selectively induced in the goldfish retina during optic nerve regeneration. Thus, CNPase enzyme activity is implicated for the first time in the process of nerve regeneration.

Down-regulation of AMPA-type glutamate receptor gene expression during goldfish optic nerve regeneration.

An AMPA-type glutamate receptor cDNA, GFGR52, was cloned from a goldfish retinal cDNA library. GFGR52 is highly homologous to the AMPA D-FLOP-type glutamate receptor. In situ hybridization revealed GFGR52 gene expression in both retinal ganglion cells and optic tectum. This expression was reduced during optic nerve regeneration and this decreased level of gene expression lasted until the reinitiation of synaptogenesis. These findings suggest that interactions between optic nerve and its target, the optic tectum are necessary for maintaining AMPA D-type glutamate receptor gene expression in both retinal and tectal neurons.

Activity-dependent retinotopic refinement in a low-density retinotectal projection in the goldfish: evidence favoring synaptic cooperation over competition

During optic nerve regeneration in goldfish, the label from a small retinal spot injection of WGA-HRP has been previously reported to be initially widely dispersed in the tectum and subsequently to condense into a small patch in the retinotopically appropriate location of tectum. This refinement involves two separate processes: one is activity independent and generates gross retinotopy; the other is activity dependent and mediates the formation of fine retinotopy. Since the number of synapses remains constant during this refinement, one or both of these processes may involve some form of competition for a limited number of synaptic sites. To clarify the role of synaptic competition, we created a low-density retinotectal projection in goldfish by deflecting about 20% of the optic fibers from one tectum into the opposite tectum, which was denervated of all other optic fibers. Under this condition, it was previously shown that less than half the normal density of synapses is formed. If competition for synaptic sites is a requirement of refinement, refinement should be prevented or significantly hindered. To monitor refinement during regeneration, 2 nl spot injections of WGA-HRP were made into the retina at various times after deflection. To distinguish between activity-dependent and activity-independent refinement, retinal impulse activity was blocked in some fish with repeated injections of TTX into the eye for the duration of the experiment. It was found that considerable activity-independent refinement occurred under continuous TTX blockade although the fibers remained more dispersed than in previous TTX studies when normal numbers of fibers were present. Surprisingly, in fish with normal impulse activity, the degree of activity-dependent refinement was almost normal. Labeled fibers condensed into a small area roughly comparable in size to that observed when the full complement of fibers was regenerating into tectum. These results suggest that competition for limited synaptic sites is not essential for activity-dependent refinement, which may, instead, be mediated by a cooperative process that actively promotes convergence. The findings further suggest that if synaptic competition plays a role in this system, it is in regulating activity-independent mechanisms that determine the large-scale distribution of fibers within tectum.

Cues intrinsic to the retina induce nAChR gene expression during development.

Recent studies of optic nerve regeneration in goldfish have indicated that the optic tectum plays an important role in modulating the induction of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) gene expression in regenerating retinal ganglion cells (Heiber, Agranoff, and Goldman, 1992, J. Neurochem. 58:1009-1015). These observations suggest that induction of these genes is regulated by brain target regions. The appearance of nAChR mRNA in the developing rat retina coincides with a time when ganglion cells are sending axons to their brain targets (Hoover and Goldman, 1992, Exp. Eye Res. 54:561-571). Might a mechanism similar to that seen during goldfish optic nerve regeneration also mediate induction of nAChR gene expression during development of the mammalian retina? This possibility was tested by either transplanting embryonic rat retina to different brain regions, or explanting it to organ culture and assaying for nAChR gene expression. These studies showed that induction of the nAChR genes in developing rat retina is independent of the environment in which the retina develops. These results indicate that either the retinal microenvironment or a signal intrinsic to the retinal ganglion cell is responsible for this induction.

Changes in the retinal ganglion cell during goldfish optic nerve regeneration

Changes in the retinal ganglion cell during goldfish optic nerve regeneration

Relationship between Tubulin Delivery and Synapse Formation during Goldfish Optic Nerve Regenerationa

Relationship between Tubulin Delivery and Synapse Formation during Goldfish Optic Nerve Regeneration^a

Expression of neuronal intermediate filament proteins ON 1 and ON 2 during goldfish optic nerve regeneration: Effect of tectal ablation

Goldfish retinal explants were used to study optic tectum participation in the regulation of intermediate filament protein synthesis in retinal ganglion cells during optic nerve regeneration. Retinas were explanted at various times after removal of the contralateral optic tectum. The synthesis of the intermediate filament proteins ON 1 and ON 2 in the cultures was quantitated by labeling with [ 35S]methionine, followed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, autoradiography, and densitometry. Neuritic growth from the explants was quantitated based on fiber length and density. In retinal explants placed in culture after 23 days of optic nerve regeneration, the synthesis of ON 1, and ON 2 was reduced when the tectum had been ablated. In contrast, synthesis of these proteins in explants placed in culture at an earlier stage of regeneration was not affected by tectal ablation. At all time points tested, neuritic outgrowth from retinal explants was stimulated by tectal ablation. These findings indicate that the synthesis of the ON 1 and ON 2 intermediate filament proteins during regeneration is not directly regulated by axonal volume. Further, our findings suggest that interaction between growing axons and tectum is important for sustained expression of these proteins during the later stages of optic nerve regeneration.

Effect of target removal on goldfish optic nerve regeneration: analysis of fast axonally transported proteins

How is axonal transport in regenerating neurons affected by contact with their synaptic target? We investigated whether removing the target (homotopic) lobe of the goldfish optic tectum altered the incorporation of 3H-proline into fast axonally transported proteins in the regenerating optic nerve. Regeneration was induced either by an optic tract lesion (to reveal the changes in the original axon segment that remained connected to the cell body) or by an optic nerve lesion (to reveal the changes in the newly formed axon segment). Of 26 proteins analyzed by 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis and fluorography, all but one showed increased labeling as a result of tectal lobe ablation. By 2 d after the lesion, significantly increased labeling of some proteins was seen with a 6-hr labeling interval, but not with a 24-hr labeling interval. This is probably indicative of an increased velocity of transport, which may have been a nonspecific consequence of the surgery. Otherwise, tectal lobe removal had relatively little effect until 3 weeks, when there was a transitory increase in labeling of transported proteins in the new axon segments of the tectum-ablated animals. Beginning at 5 weeks, tectal lobe ablation caused considerably higher labeling of many of the proteins in the original axon segments. Because this was seen with both 6-hr and 24-hr labeling intervals, it is probably indicative of increased protein synthesis. The increased synthesis lasted until at least 12 weeks, though some proteins were beginning to show a diminished effect at this time. In the late stages of regeneration (8-12 weeks), there was also increased labeling of proteins in the new axon segments as a result of the absence of the target tectal lobe. This included a disproportionately large increase in the relative contribution of cytoskeletal proteins and of protein 4, which is the goldfish equivalent of the growth-associated protein GAP-43 (neuromodulin). We conclude that, after the regenerating axons begin to innervate the tectum, the expression of most of the proteins in fast axonal transport is down-regulated by interaction between the axons and their target. However, the changes in expression may be preceded by a modulation of the turnover and/or deposition of proteins in the newly formed axon segment.

Protein phosphorylation: Localization in regenerating optic axons

A number of axonal proteins display changes in phosphorylation during goldfish optic nerve regeneration (Larrivee and Grafstein, 1989). (1) To determine whether the phosphorylation of these proteins was closely linked to their synthesis in the retinal ganglion cell body, cycloheximide was injected intraocularly into goldfish whose optic nerves had been regenerating for 3 weeks. Cycloheximide reduced the incorporation of [3H]proline and 32P orthophosphate into total nerve protein by 84% and 46%, respectively. Of the 20 individual proteins examined, 17 contained less than 15% of the [3H]proline label measured in corresponding controls, whereas 18 proteins contained 50% or more of the 32P label, suggesting that phosphorylation was largely independent of synthesis. (2) To determine whether the proteins were phosphorylated in the ganglion cell axons, axonal transport of proteins was blocked by intraocular injection of vincristine. Vincristine reduced [3H]proline labeling of total protein by 88% and 32P labeling by 49%. Among the individual proteins [3H]proline labeling was reduced by 90% or more in 18 cases but 32P labeling was reduced only by 50% or less. (3) When 32P was injected into the cranial cavity near the ends of the optic axons, all of the phosphoproteins were labeled more intensely in the optic tract than in the optic nerve. These results suggest that most of the major phosphoproteins that undergo changes in phosphorylation in the course of regeneration are phosphorylated in the optic axons.

A plasminogen activator is induced during goldfish optic nerve regeneration.

The use of purified piscine plasminogen in a chromogenic solution assay enabled us to detect plasminogen activator (PA) activity in crude homogenates of goldfish optic nerve following nerve injury. In contrast, no activity was detected in the homogenates of uninjured nerve. Under conditions allowing regeneration of the optic axons (optic nerve crush), PA activity peaked 8 days after crush, and decreased to undetectable levels by 60 days. Under conditions allowing only degeneration of the axons (enucleation), the activity peaked at 8 days but decreased more rapidly. Casein zymography of samples after fractionation in SDS-PAGE showed that PA activity migrated as a doublet at Mr = 60-65 kd. Using this assay, activity was also observed in uninjured control nerves. This plasminogen-dependent activity migrated as three bands of higher molecular weight (Mr = 75, 95 and 120 kd) and was undetectable in solution assays of unfractionated extracts, suggesting complex formation with an inhibitor(s). Fibrin overlay assay of retinal explants and isolated primary cells in culture suggest that the goldfish PA is associated with the glial cells of the goldfish visual pathway.