Goal-directed Fluid Therapy Group Research Articles

The effect of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in patients under anesthesia for gastrointestinal surgery.

Intraoperative fluid management is an important aspect of anesthesia management in gastrointestinal surgery. Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) is a method for optimizing a patient's physiological state by monitoring and regulating fluid input in real-time. To evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative GDFT in patients under anesthesia for gastrointestinal surgery. This study utilized a retrospective comparative study design and included 60 patients who underwent gastrointestinal surgery at a hospital. The experimental group (GDFT group) and the control group, each comprising 30 patients, received intraoperative GDFT and traditional fluid management strategies, respectively. The effect of GDFT was evaluated by comparing postoperative recovery, complication rates, hospitalization time, and other indicators between the two patient groups. Intraoperative blood loss in the experimental and control groups was 296.64 ± 46.71 mL and 470.05 ± 73.26 mL (P < 0.001), and urine volume was 415.13 ± 96.72 mL and 239.15 ± 94.69 mL (P < 0.001), respectively. The postoperative recovery time was 5.44 ± 1.1 days for the experimental group compared to 7.59 ± 1.45 days (P < 0.001) for the control group. Hospitalization time for the experimental group was 10.87 ± 2.36 days vs 13.65 ± 3 days for the control group (P < 0.001). The visual analogue scale scores of the experimental and control groups at 24 h and 48 h post-surgery were 3.38 ± 0.79 and 4.51 ± 0.86, and 2.05 ± 0.57 and 3.51 ± 0.97 (P < 0.001), respectively. The cardiac output of the experimental and control groups was 5.99 ± 1.04 L/min and 4.88 ± 1.17 L/min, respectively, while the pulse pressure variability for these two groups was 10.87 ± 2.36% and 17.5 ± 3.21%, respectively. The application of GDFT in gastrointestinal surgery can significantly improve postoperative recovery, reduce the incidence of complications, and shorten hospital stays.

Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in adult patients undergoing craniotomies under general anaesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has conflicting evidence regarding outcomes in neurosurgical patients. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effect of GDFT and conventional fluid therapy on various perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, Cochrane and preprint servers. The search was conducted up until 16 October 2023, following PROSPERO registration. The search strategy included terms related to GDFT, neurosurgery and perioperative outcomes. Only randomised controlled trials involving adult humans and comparing GDFT with standard/liberal/traditional/restricted fluid therapy were included. The studies were evaluated for risk of bias (RoB), and pooled estimates of the outcomes were measured in terms of risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD). No statistically significant difference was observed in neurological outcomes between GDFT and conventional fluid therapy [RR with 95% confidence interval (CI) was 1.10 (0.69, 1.75), two studies, 90 patients, low certainty of evidence using GRADEpro]. GDFT reduced postoperative complications [RR = 0.67 (0.54, 0.82), six studies, 392 participants] and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay [MD (95% CI) were -1.65 (-3.02, -0.28) and -0.94 (-1.47, -0.42), respectively] with high certainty of evidence. The pulmonary complications were significantly lower in the GDFT group [RR (95% CI) = 0.55 (0.38, 0.79), seven studies, 442 patients, high certainty of evidence]. Other outcomes, including total intraoperative fluids administered and blood loss, were comparable in GDFT and conventional therapy groups [MD (95% CI) were -303.87 (-912.56, 304.82) and -14.79 (-49.05, 19.46), respectively]. The perioperative GDFT did not influence the neurological outcome. The postoperative complications and hospital and ICU stay were significantly reduced in the GDFT group.

Fluid therapy and pulmonary complications in abdominal surgeries: randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThere is no consensus on the most effective strategy for Postoperative Pulmonary Complication (PPC) reduction. This study hypothesized that a Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy (GDFT) protocol of infusion of predetermined boluses reduces the occurrence of PPC in patients undergoing elective open abdominal surgeries when compared with Standard of Care (SOC) strategy. MethodsRandomized, prospective, controlled study, conducted from May 2012 to December 2014, with ASA I, II or III patients undergoing open abdominal surgeries, lasting at least 120 min, under general anesthesia, randomized into the SOC and the GDFT group. In the SOC, fluid administration was according to the anesthesiologist's discretion. In the GDFT, the intervention protocol, based on bolus infusion according to blood pressure and delta pulse pressure, was applied. Patients were postoperatively evaluated by an anesthesiologist blinded to the group allocation regarding PPC incidence, mortality, and Length of Hospital Stay (LOHS). ResultsForty-two patients in the SOC group and 43 in the GDFT group. Nineteen patients (45%) in the SOC and 6 in the GDFT (14%) had at least one PPC (p = 0.003). There was no difference in mortality or LOHS between the groups. Among the patients with PPC, four died (25%), compared to two deaths in patients without PPC (3%) (p = 0.001). The LOHS had a median of 14.5 days in the group with PPC and 9 days in the group without PPC (p = 0.001). ConclusionThe GDFT protocol resulted in a lower rate of PPC; however, the LOHS and mortality did not reduce.

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients with colorectal cancer: A randomized controlled study comparing goal-directed and conventional fluid therapy.

To investigate the impact of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) on postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in elderly patients with colorectal cancer, we conducted a randomized controlled trial. Eighty elderly patients who underwent elective laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to either the GDFT group or the conventional fluid therapy group. The primary outcome was the incidence of POCD during the initial 7 postoperative days, while secondary outcomes included inflammatory marker levels such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and S100β protein, hemodynamics, level of lactic acid, postoperative functional recovery, and complications. Among 88 randomized patients, 80 were evaluable for the primary outcome. The incidence of POCD was significantly lower in the GDFT group (15.0%) compared to the conventional fluid therapy group (30.0%), with the highest occurrence observed on day 3 postoperatively in both groups (P < 0.05). IL-6 and S100β concentrations were consistently lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional fluid therapy group at the corresponding time points (P < 0.05). The GDFT group exhibited more stable perioperative hemodynamics and lower lactate levels (P < 0.05). Moreover, patients in the GDFT group exhibited better postoperative functional recovery indicators and a lower incidence of postoperative complications (P < 0.05). In summary, GDFT appears to reduce the incidence of early POCD, accelerate postoperative recovery, and enhance overall prognosis.

Goal-directed fluid therapy guided by plethysmographic variability index versus conventional liberal fluid therapy in neonates undergoing abdominal surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Intraoperative fluid therapy maintains normovolemia, normal tissue perfusion, normal metabolic function, normal electrolytes, and acid-base status. Plethysmographic variability index has been shown to predict fluid responsiveness but its role in guiding intraoperative fluid therapy is still elusive. The aim of the present study was to compare intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy based on plethysmographic variability index with liberal fluid therapy in term neonates undergoing abdominal surgeries. A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted in a tertiary care centre, over a period of 18 months. A total of 30 neonates completed the study out of 132 neonates screened. Neonates with tracheoesophageal fistula, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, congenital heart disease, respiratory disorders, creatinine clearance <90 mL/min and who were hemodynamically unstable were excluded. Neonates were randomized to goal-directed fluid therapy group where the plethysmographic variability index was targeted at <18 or liberal fluid therapy group. Primary outcome was comparison of total amount of fluid infused intraoperatively in both the groups. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative arterial blood gas parameters, biochemical parameters, use of vasopressors, number of fluid boluses, complications and duration of hospital stay. There was no significant difference in total intraoperative fluid infused [90 (84-117.5 mL) in goal-directed fluid therapy and 105 (85.5-144.5 mL) in liberal fluid therapy group (p = .406)], median difference (95% CI) -15 (-49.1 to 19.1). There was a decrease in serum lactate levels in both groups from preoperative to postoperative 24 h. The amount of fluid infused before dopamine administration was significantly higher in liberal fluid therapy group (58 [50.25-65 mL]) compared to goal-directed fluid therapy group (36 [22-44 mL], p = .008), median difference (95% CI) -22 (-46 to 2). In postoperative period, the total amount of fluid intake over 24 h was comparable in two groups (222 [204-253 mL] in goal-directed fluid therapy group and 224 [179.5-289.5 mL] in liberal fluid therapy group, p = .917) median difference (95% CI) cutoff -2 (-65.3 to 61.2). Intraoperative plethysmographic variability index-guided goal-directed fluid therapy was comparable to liberal fluid therapy in terms of total volume of fluid infused in neonates during perioperative period. More randomized controlled trials with higher sample size are required. Central Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2020/02/023561).

Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in neurosurgical patients: A systematic review.

Perioperative fluid management is critical in neurosurgery as over perfusion can lead to brain edema whereas under perfusion may lead to brain hypoperfusion or ischemia. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) in patients undergoing intracranial surgeries. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane, and PubMed databases and forward-backward citations for studies published between database inception and February 22, 2024. Randomized controlled trials where intraoperative GDFT was performed in neurosurgery and compared to the conventional regime were included in the study. GDFT was compared with the conventional regime as per primary outcomes - total intraoperative fluid requirement, serum lactate, hemodynamics, brain relaxation, urine output, serum biochemistry, and secondary outcomes - intensive care unit and hospital length of stay. The quality of evidence was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. This study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024518816). Of 75 records identified, eight were eligible, the majority of which had a low to moderate risk of overall bias. In four studies, more fluid was given in the control group. No difference in postoperative lactate values was noted in 50% of studies. In the remaining 50%, lactate was more in the control group. Three out of four studies did not find any significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative hypotension, and four out of six studies did not find a significant difference in vasopressor requirement. The majority of studies did not show significant differences in urine output, brain relaxation, and length of stay between both groups. None found any difference in acid base status or electrolyte levels. GDFT, when compared to the conventional regime in neurosurgery, showed that the total volume of fluids administered was lesser in the GDFT group with no increase in serum lactate. There was no difference in the hemodynamics, urine output, brain relaxation, urine output, length of stay, and biochemical parameters.

Restrictive versus goal-directed fluid replacement strategy in ovarian cancer cytoreductive surgery (RiGoROCS): A randomised controlled trial.

Although goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) is associated with reduced morbidity and length of stay (LOS) in the hospital after major surgery, it has not been widely studied in ovarian cancer cytoreductive surgery (CRS). The primary objective of the study was post-operative LOS. In this double-blind, randomised controlled trial, ovarian cancer patients undergoing elective CRS were randomised to receive either GDFT or restrictive fluid therapy after pre-randomisation stratification for primary debulking surgery or interval debulking surgery. The primary objective was to measure post-operative LOS in the hospital. Secondary outcome measures were the cost of surgical treatment episode and post-operative morbidity assessed by post-operative morbidity survey (POMS) on the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 7th post-operative day and at discharge. Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification was used to assess the 30-day morbidity/mortality rate. Median LOS was 7 days (interquartile range (IQR): 5-10; P = 0.282) in both groups. Median POMS at day 3 was 3 (IQR: 2-5) in the GDFT and 4 (IQR: 2.25-2.75) in the control groups (P = 0.625). The cost of treatment was INR 310907 (IQR: INR 211,856-427,490) in the GDFT group and INR 342,468 (IQR: INR 270,179-454,122) in the control group (P = 0.100). Grade 3-5 CD morbidity was 7 (12%) in GDFT and 9 (16%) in the control group (P = 0.790). GDFT did not confer significant benefit over restrictive fluid therapy in ovarian cancer CRS regarding hospital LOS.

Goal-directed fluid therapy compared to liberal fluid therapy in patients subjected to colorectal surgery

ABSTRACT Background The best technique to manage intraoperative fluids during colorectal surgery has never been universally agreed upon. Key organ function is hampered by excessive intraoperative fluid administration: It lengthens and raises the expense of hospitalization by increasing the risk of heart failure that goes along with it, causing gastrointestinal membrane edema, and impeding the recovery of gastrointestinal functions. Aim and objectives Thestudy’s objective was to evaluate the impacts of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) and liberal fluid therapy (LFT) using cardiometry in candidates with colorectal abnormalities. Subjects and methods 100 patients were allocated into two equal groups in a random pattern for this prospective, randomized, controlled trial at the Mansoura oncology center; GDFT group) 50 patients): by using stroke volume optimization and the LFT group (50 patients): by using the traditional technique of fluid administration. Results Crystalloid and total fluids were significantly lower among GDFTgroup compared to LFT group. Both lactate and creatinine levels were slightly higher among the GDFT group than the LFT group but without a statistically significant difference. Postoperative complications were comparable between the studied groups. Conclusions However, GDFT needs lower total volume of fluids given to the patients it may not enhance patients’ postoperative outcomes after colorectal surgery compared to liberal fluid treatment. Moreover, both studied strategies did not affect organ perfusion, although serum lactate and serum creatinine were slightly higher with GDFT.

The effect of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy combined with enhanced recovery after surgery program on postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection: a prospective randomized controlled study

BackgroundTo investigate the effect of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) combined with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program on postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection.MethodsPatients, more than 60 years old, undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection for non-small cell lung cancer were randomly divided into GDFT group and restrictive fluid therapy (RFT) group. ERAS program was implemented in all patients. In GDFT group, the intraoperative fluid management was guided by stroke volume variation (SVV), cardiac index (CI), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) and maintained the SVV < 13%, CI > 2.5 L/min/m2, and MAP > 65 mmHg. In RFT group, fluid maintenance with 2 ml/kg/h of balanced crystalloid solution, norepinephrine was used to maintain MAP > 65 mmHg. The incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) and pulmonary and cardiac complications was compared.ResultsTwo-hundred seventy-six patients were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups (138 in each group). Compared to RFT group, the total intraoperative infusion volume, colloids infusion volume, and urine output were more; the dosage of norepinephrine was lower in GDFT group. Although there were no significant differences of postoperative AKI (GDFT vs RFT; 4.3% vs 8%; P = 0.317) and composite postoperative complications (GDFT vs RFT; 66 vs 70) between groups, but the postoperative increase degree of serum creatinine was lower in GDFT group than that in RFT group (GDFT vs RFT; 91.9 ± 25.2 μmol/L vs 97.1 ± 17.6 μmol/L; P = 0.048).ConclusionsUnder ERAS program, there was no significant difference of AKI incidence between GDFT and RFT in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection. But postoperative increase degree of serum creatinine was lower in GDFT group.Trial registrationRegistered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04302467 on 26 February 2020.

Intraoperative pleth variability index-based fluid management therapy and gastrointestinal surgical outcomes in elderly patients: a randomised controlled trial

BackgroundIntraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has been reported to reduce postoperative complications of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. The clinical benefits of pleth variability index (PVI)-directed fluid management for gastrointestinal (GI) surgical patients remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of PVI-directed GDFT on GI surgical outcomes in elderly patients.MethodsThis randomised controlled trial was conducted in two university teaching hospitals from November 2017 to December 2020. In total, 220 older adults undergoing GI surgery were randomised to the GDFT or conventional fluid therapy (CFT) group (n = 110 each). The primary outcome was a composite of complications within 30 postoperative days. The secondary outcomes were cardiopulmonary complications, time to first flatus, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and postoperative length of stay.ResultsThe total volumes of fluid administered were less in the GDFT group than in the CFT group (2.075 L versus [vs.] 2.5 L, P = 0.008). In intention-to-treat analysis, there was no difference in overall complications between the CFT group (41.3%) and GDFT group (43.0%) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.935; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.541–1.615; P = 0.809). The proportion of cardiopulmonary complications was higher in the CFT group than in the GDFT group (19.2% vs. 8.4%; OR = 2.593, 95% CI, 1.120–5.999; P = 0.022). No other differences were identified between the two groups.ConclusionsAmong elderly patients undergoing GI surgery, intraoperative GDFT based on the simple and non-invasive PVI did not reduce the occurrence of composite postoperative complications but was associated with a lower cardiopulmonary complication rate than usual fluid management.Trial registrationThis trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-TRC-17012220) on 1 August 2017.

Effect of Goal-directed Fluid Therapy on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in Elderly Patients Undergoing Combined Lingual and Cervical Radical Surgery

Background: The intraoperative rehydration technique known as the effect of Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy (GDFT), which is guided by the dynamic monitoring of volume responsiveness, has received a lot of attention recently. According to a meta-analysis by Bene, GDFT can maintain intraoperative hemodynamic stability, which lowers the incidence of postoperative complications and reduces stay at the intensive care unit. Objectives: This study aimed to determine how GDFT affected elderly patients who underwent combined lingual and cervical radical surgery after an operation for postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). Methods: This interventional study was conducted between December 2021 and December 2022 in a medical center affiliated with Fujian Medical University on people undergoing radical neck and tongue surgery for tongue cancer. The samples (n=36) were selected using an availability sampling method and randomly divided into conventional fluid therapy (the Non-GDFT, n=18) and GDFT (n=18) groups. The Non-GDFT group was hydrated normally during anesthesia. A continuous infusion of 8 mL/(kg/h) of compounded sodium chloride was administered to the GDFT group to maintain basal hydration volume during the operation. Before and following surgery, Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale scores were completed, arterial blood lactate values and bilateral cerebral oxygen saturation levels were measured at various times following the stabilization of anesthesia, and the levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6) and S100 protein in venous blood were calculated. Results: The Non-GDFT group had a higher incidence of POCD than the GDFT group, the GDFT group had significantly lower levels of IL-6 and S100 than the Non-GDFT group, the GDFT group had significantly lower levels of serum lactate than the Non-GDFT group. The GDFT group experienced significantly lower rates of intraoperative hypotensive and intraoperative low rSO2 events than the Non-GDFT group, and this difference was statistically significant (P&lt;0.05). Conclusion: Assuring the balance of cerebral oxygen supply and demand, lowering the production of inflammatory mediators, and successfully reducing the incidence of POCD are all possible benefits of GDFT.

Early prediction of acute kidney injury with cell cycle arrest biomarkers using plethesmography directed fluid management in major abdominal surgery

ABSTRACT Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a known complication after major abdominal surgery. Use of the usual functional AKI biomarkers for detection shows delayed results, and so, the use of cell cycle arrest biomarker was proposed. Purpose The aim of the present study was to assess the arrest biomarker as an early tool for AKI prediction in major abdominal surgery. Methods After receiving approval from the Ethics Committee and taking informed written consent, a prospective randomized study was conducted. Forty adult patients were scheduled for major abdominal surgery. Patients were randomly categorized using closed-envelope technique into two equal groups (25 patients each): the control group (20 patients) with intraoperative standard fluid therapy and the goal-directed fluid therapy (GDT) (20 patients) using plethysmography. Urinary cycle arrest biomarkers were measured at 4 and 12 h after ICU admission. Results The mean value of the arrest biomarkers showed a significant increase in the control group only at 4 h period (p = 0.017). Moreover, there was a statistically significant increase in the number of positive patients in the control group at 4 h period only (p = 0.044). Urine arrest biomarkers were higher in AKI patients than in the non-AKI ones at 4 h (p = 0.003) and 12 h (p = 0.004). The arrest biomarker AUROC values at 4 and 12 h were 0.887 and 0.875, respectively. Conclusion From these results, we concluded that cell cycle arrest biomarkers can predict AKI after major abdominal surgery. In addition, AKI incidence showed no difference between the control group and the GDT group.

The Impact of Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Patients with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are at high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has been proven effective in improving postoperative gastrointestinal function in patients with obesity, but its effect on prevention of PONV remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the impact of GDFT on PONV in high-risk patients with LSG. In a randomized, single-blinded, two-arm trial, patients with an Apfel score ≥ 3 and scheduled for LSG were included. Patients in the GDFT group received stroke volume-guided fluid therapy. Patients in the control group received conventional fluid therapy. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV within 48h after LSG. The second outcome included intensity of PONV, use of rescue therapy, recovery of gastrointestinal function, and postoperative length of stay (LOS). A total of 137 patients were analyzed. The incidence of PONV in the GDFT group was lower than that in the control group (47.1% vs. 71.6%; odds ratio [95%CI], 0.35 [0.17-0.72]; P = 0.004). Fewer patients in the GDFT group received rescue therapy (30% vs. 58.2%; P = 0.001). Patients following GDFT protocol had a faster return of flatus (27.5 (19, 31) vs. 31 (20, 48) hours, P = 0.037) and shorter postoperative LOS (6.1 ± 1.0 vs. 6.6 ± 1.1days; P = 0.007). GDFT is conducive to deceasing PONV occurrence, restoring intestinal function, and shortening postoperative LOS in high-risk patients undergoing LSG.

Ward based goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) in acute pancreatitis (GAP) trial: A feasibility randomised controlled trial

BackgroundGoal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) reduces complications in patients undergoing major general surgery. There are no reports of cardiac output evaluation being used to optimise the fluid administration for patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) in a general surgery ward. Method50 patients with AP were randomised to either ward-based GDFT (n = 25) with intravenous (IV) fluids administered based on stroke volume optimisation protocol or standard care (SC) (n = 25), but with blinded cardiac output evaluation, for 48-h following hospital admission. Primary outcome was feasibility. Results50 of 116 eligible patients (43.1%) were recruited over 20 months demonstrating feasibility. 36 (72%) completed the 48-h of GDFT; 10 (20%) discharged within 48-h and 4 withdrawals (3 GDFT, 1 SC). Baseline characteristics were similar with only 3 participants having severe disease (6%, 1 GDFT, 2 SC). Similar volumes of IV fluids were administered in both groups (GDFT 5465 (1839) ml, SC 5211 (1745) ml). GDFT group had a lower heart rate, blood pressure and respiratory rate and improved oxygen saturations. GDFT was not associated with any harms. There was no evidence of difference in complications of AP (GDFT 24%, SC 32%) or in the duration of stay in intensive care (GDFT 0 (0), SC 0.7 (3) days). Length of hospital stay was 5 (2.9) days in GDFT and 6.3 (7.6) in SC groups. ConclusionWard-based GDFT is feasible and shows a signal of possible efficacy in AP in this early-stage study. A larger multi-site RCT is required to confirm clinical and cost effectiveness.

Influence of different regimens of volumetric therapy on perioperative intestinal flora in the surgical patients with pancreas tumor, a randomized controlled trial study

BackgroundIt is not clear whether the perioperative intestinal microenvironment of patients undergoing pancreatic tumor surgery is affected by intraoperative fluid therapy.MethodFifty-eight patients who underwent a confined excision of pancreas mass at this center were enrolled. The patients were grouped according to the random number table in these two groups: the liberal fluid infusion (LFI) group and the goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) group. Perioperative anesthesia management was carried out by the same team of anesthesiologists according to a preset anesthetic protocol. Fecal samples were collected twice: within 2 days before the surgery and at 6 to 8 days postoperatively. The collected fecal samples were sequenced through microbial diversity high-throughput 16 s-rDNA; and the differential changes of intestinal flora were analyzed.ResultsMain components of flora in the sample were significantly different between LFI and GDFT groups. As shown by the difference in species, in GDFT group, more constituent bacteria participated in the metabolism inside human body and the restoration of coagulation function, including: prevotella, roseburia, lachnospiracea, dialister and clostridium (P < 0.05); in LFI group, more constituent bacteria were opportunistic pathogenic bacteria, including: enterococcus, pseudomonas aeruginosa, and acinetobacter baumannii (P < 0.05).ConclusionFor surgical patients with pancreas tumor, there are significant differences of intestinal flora in diversity between GDFT and LFI. GDFT seems to play a more important role in protection and restoration of intestinal flora.Clinical trial registrationChiCTR2000035187.

Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Enhances Gastrointestinal Recovery after Laparoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

(1) Background: Whether goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) provides any outcome benefit as compared to non-goal-directed fluid therapy (N-GDFT) in elective abdominal laparoscopic surgery has not been determined yet. (2) Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus. The main outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOHS), time to first flatus and stool, intraoperative fluid and vasopressor requirements, serum lactate levels, and urinary output. Pooled risks ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI for continuous outcomes. (3) Results: Eleven studies were included in the quantitative, and fifteen in the qualitative synthesis. LOHS (WMD: −1.18 days, 95% CI: −1.84 to −0.53) and time to first stool (WMD: −9.8 h; CI −12.7 to −7.0) were significantly shorter in the GDFT group. GDFT resulted in significantly less intraoperative fluid administration (WMD: −441 mL, 95% CI: −790 to −92) and lower lactate levels at the end of the operation: WMD: −0.25 mmol L−1; 95% CI: −0.36 to −0.14. (4) Conclusions: GDFT resulted in enhanced recovery of the gastrointestinal function and shorter LOHS as compared to N-GDFT.

Goal-Directed Intraoperative Fluid Therapy Benefits Patients Undergoing Major Gynecologic Oncology Surgery: A Controlled Before-and-After Study.

BackgroundFluid management during major gynecologic oncology surgeries faces great challenges due to the distinctive characteristics of patients with gynecologic malignancies as well as features of the surgical procedure. Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has been proven to be effective in reducing postoperative complications among major colorectal surgeries; however, the efficacy of GDFT has not been fully studied in gynecologic malignancy surgeries. This study aimed to discuss the influence of GDFT practice in patients undergoing major gynecologic oncology surgery.MethodsThis study was a controlled before-and-after study. From June 2015 to June 2018 in Peking Union Medical College Hospital, a total of 300 patients scheduled for elective laparotomy of gynecological malignancies were enrolled and chronologically allocated into two groups, with the earlier 150 patients in the control group and the latter 150 patients in the GDFT group. The GDFT protocol was applied by Vigileo/FloTrac monitoring of stroke volume and fluid responsiveness to guide intraoperative fluid infusion and the use of vasoactive agents. The primary outcome was postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery. The secondary outcome included length of stay and time of functional recovery.ResultsA total of 249 patients undergoing major gynecologic oncology surgery were analyzed in the study, with 129 in the control group and 120 patients in the GDFT group. Patients in the GDFT group had higher ASA classifications and more baseline comorbidities. GDFT patients received significantly less fluid infusion than the control group (15.8 vs. 17.9 ml/kg/h), while fluid loss was similar (6.9 vs. 7.1 ml/kg/h). GDFT was associated with decreased risk of postoperative complications (OR = 0.572, 95% CI 0.343 to 0.953, P = 0.032), especially surgical site infections (OR = 0.127, 95% CI 0.003 to 0.971, P = 0.037). The postoperative bowel function recovery and length of hospital stay were not significantly different between the two groups.ConclusionGoal-directed intraoperative fluid therapy is associated with fewer postoperative complications in patients undergoing major gynecologic oncology surgery.

Goal-directed fluid therapy in gastrointestinal cancer surgery

Objective: To investigate the effects of perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) on intraoperative fluid balance, postoperative morbidity, and mortality. Methods: This is a prospective randomized study, and 90 patients who underwent elective open gastrointestinal cancer surgery between April 2017 and May 2018 were included. Patients were randomized into 2 groups that received liberal fluid therapy (the LFT group, n=45) and goal-directed fluid therapy (the GDFT group, n=45). Patients’ Colorectal Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (CR-POSSUM) physiological score, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), perioperative vasopressor and inotrope use, postoperative AKIN classification, postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization, hospital stay, and 30-day mortality were recorded. Results: The volume of crystalloid used perioperatively and the total volume of fluid were significantly lower in the GDFT group compared to the LFT group (P&lt;0.05). CR-POSSUM physiological score and CCI were significantly higher in the GDFT group (P&lt;0.05). Although perioperative vasopressor and inotrope use was significantly higher in the GDFT group (P&lt;0.05), postoperative acute kidney injury development was not affected. Postoperative mortality was determined to be similar in both groups (P&gt;0.05). Conclusion: Although GDFT was demonstrated to be a good alternative method to LFT in open gastrointestinal cancer surgery, and it can prevent perioperative fluid overload, and the postoperative results are comparable in the two groups.

Effect of post-operative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) on organ function after orthotopic liver transplantation: Secondary outcome analysis of the COLT randomised control trial

BackgroundGoal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has been shown to reduce the complications following a variety of major surgical procedures, possibly mediated by improved organ perfusion and function. We have shown that it is feasible to randomise patients to GDFT or standard fluid management following liver transplant in the cardiac-output optimisation following liver transplantation (COLT) trial. The current study compares end organ function in patients from the COLT trial who received GDFT in comparison to those receiving standard care (SC) following liver transplant. MethodsAdult patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation were randomised to GDFT or SC for the first 12 h following surgery as detailed in a published trial protocol. GDFT protocol was based on stroke volume (SV) optimisation using 250 ml crystalloid boluses. Total fluid administration and time to extubation were recorded. Hourly SV and cardiac output (CO) readings were recorded from the non-invasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM) device in both groups. Pulmonary function was assessed by arterial blood gas (ABG) and ventilatory parameters. Lung injury was assessed using PaO2:FiO2 ratios and calculated pulmonary compliance. The KDIGO score was used for determining acute kidney injury. Renal and liver graft function were assessed during the post-operative period and at 3 months and 1-year. Results60 patients were randomised to GDFT (n = 30) or SC (n = 30). All patients completed the 12 h intervention period. GDFT group received a significantly higher total volume of fluid during the 12 h trial intervention period (GDFT 5317 (2335) vs. SC 3807 (1345) ml, p = 0.003); in particular crystalloids (GDFT 3968 (2073) vs. SC 2510 (1027) ml, p = 0.002). There was no evidence of significant difference between the groups in SV or CO during the assessment periods. Time to extubation, PaO2: FIO2 ratios, pulmonary compliance, ventilatory or blood gas measurements were similar in both groups. There was a significant rise in serum creatinine from baseline (77 μmol/L) compared to first (87 μmol/L, p = 0.039) and second (107 μmol/L, p = 0.001) post-operative days. There was no difference between GDFT and SC in the highest KDIGO scores for the first 7 days post-LT. At 1-year follow-up, there was no difference in need for renal replacement therapy or graft function. ConclusionsIn this randomised trial of fluid therapy post liver transplant, GDFT was associated with an increased volume of crystalloids administered but did not alter early post-operative pulmonary or renal function when compared with standard care.

Effect of Goal-Directed Intraoperative Fluid Therapy on Duration of Hospital Stay and Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Excision of Large Supratentorial Tumors.

Optimal fluid management during neurosurgery is controversial. Evidences suggest that goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) can improve postoperative outcome. This study aimed to assess the intraoperative use of GDFT on the duration of hospital stay and postoperative complications in patients undergoing craniotomy for large supratentorial tumors. Forty patients of 18-65 years age undergoing large supratentorial tumor surgery were prospectively randomized into two groups. Control-group received fluid regimen based on routine hemodynamic monitoring, whereas patients belonging to GDFT group received fluid based on stroke volume variation (SVV)-guided therapy. A colloid bolus of 250 ml 6% hydroxyl ethyl starch was given, if the SVV was more than 12% in the GDFT group. Hemodynamic parameters, such as blood pressure and heart rate, and dynamic parameters, such as cardiac index, stroke volume index, and SVV, were recorded at different time intervals. The total amount of fluid required was significantly lower in GDFT (P = 0.003) group as compared to the Control group. Intraoperative complications were significantly lower in GDFT group (P = 0.005), but the incidence of tight brain was significantly higher in the control group. The duration of hospital stay (P = 0.07) and incidence of postoperative complications (P = 0.32) were lower in GDFT group. Neurological outcomes at-discharge were similar in both the groups. This study did not show any benefit of GDFT over conventional intraoperative fluid therapy in terms of incidence of postoperative complications, hospital and ICU stay, and Glasgow outcome scores at-discharge in patients undergoing craniotomy for excision of large supratentorial tumors. However, the use of GDFT leads to better perioperative fluid management and brain relaxation scores. CTRI/2016/10/007350.