Gluteal Augmentation Research Articles

Long Term Follow-Up in Gluteal Augmentation Using Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid: Up to 20 Months Ultrasound Follow-Up

Long Term Follow-Up in Gluteal Augmentation Using Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid: Up to 20 Months Ultrasound Follow-Up

Sciatic Nerve Transection Following Prosthetic Buttock Augmentation: First Reported Case and Review of the Literature

Abstract Gluteal augmentation is typically carried out by implant placement or autologous fat grafting. Over recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of gluteal augmentations being performed. However, as the number of procedures has increased, so too have the number of complications. We present a case of a 33-year-old female with an implant infection with concomitant sciatic nerve transection following bilateral gluteal augmentation with implants leading to a permanent foot-drop. While transient sciatica due to compression has been described as a complication of gluteal augmentation, this is the first reported case, to our knowledge, of transection. The many unusual management decisions that had to be made when faced with this rare and devastating complication are highlighted and the relevant literature on gluteal augmentation is discussed. Patients and surgeons alike need to take particular care when considering this procedure.

#BrazilianButtLift: The Reel Problem Regarding Gluteal Augmentation Surgery.

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Analysis of 4725 Cases of Gluteal Augmentation with Intramuscular Fillers: A Clinical Cohort Study.

In recent years, the aesthetic market has become more prominent for being not only a tool to correct unwanted features but also a social means for improving quality of life. The use of 30% polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) as a gluteal filler has grown in popularity all over the world, being sought after by men and women for body remodeling because it provides a natural look as well as significant long-lasting results. A retrospective, multicenter study analyzed the medical records of 2801 patients who underwent a total of 4725 gluteal filler procedures between January 2009 and December 2021 at the different locations of Clínica Leger. The study protocol was approved by the Brazilian National Research Ethics Commission. The medical records of 2801 patients (2666 women and 135 men) who underwent 4725 gluteal filler injections were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 922,776 mL of PMMA was used (average = 329 mL/patient). The occurrence of 101 adverse events (2.1%) was observed, and no statistically significant relationship between the mean injected volume and the incidence of complications could be found. According to the data presented in this study, the use of PMMA injections with the appropriate volumes for aesthetic treatments and corrections is safe and effective.

Implant-Based Gluteal Augmentation:Comparing Complications Between Single- and Double-Incision Techniques.

Gluteal implants are gaining popularity as an alternative to fat grafting for gluteal augmentation. This study aims to compare complication rates between single- and double-incision techniques for implant placement in gluteal augmentation from a single surgeon's experience. Retrospective analysis of a single surgeon's implant-based gluteal augmentations was conducted between October 2018 and August 2022. Consecutive patient cases were reviewed at the beginning and end of the designated period to compare both incision techniques after switching from the single- to double-incision technique in September 2020. Demographics and postoperative complications were compared. Statistical comparisons were made using the independent sample t-test for quantitative variables and the Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. The study included 134 single-incision patients (247 implants) and 47 double-incision patients (91 implants). Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups were similar. Overall complication rate per implant was higher in the single-incision group (16.6% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.02). The most common complication per implant was delayed wound healing (single incision: 9.7%, double incision: 5.5%). The odds ratio of developing at least one complication in the double compared to the single-incision group was 0.44 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.92). The double incision techniquedemonstrates a lower complication rate than the single-incision technique for implant-based gluteal augmentation. The most common complication in both groups was delayed wound healing which responded in most patients to conservative wound care. These results support using the double-incision technique for implant-based gluteal augmentation. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Enhancing Buttock Contours: A Safer Approach to Gluteal Augmentation with Ultrasonic Liposuction, Submuscular Implants, and Ultrasound-Guided Fat Grafting.

Background: The global popularity of gluteal augmentation has risen significantly, driven by the desire for enhanced buttocks size and shape to align with individual patient preferences. This increased demand has prompted extensive research into diverse techniques and their safety. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of a gluteal augmentation technique involving ultrasound-assisted liposuction, submuscular implants, and ultrasound-guided fat grafting. Our study involved a review of the medical records of 50 consecutive patients who underwent this procedure between February 2020 and July 2023. Results: Data related to patient demographics, the quantity of fat grafts, and any complications were analyzed. Additionally, a brief survey was conducted to evaluate patient satisfaction. The Polytech implants were used in forty-four patients, and Sebbin implants in six. The implant size varied from 285 to 560. Most of the Polytech implants were 390 cc (25/44; 56.8%). Two patients had a minor infection at the incision sites and subsequent wound dehiscence. No revision surgeries were needed. Conclusions: The presented technique incorporates ultrasonic liposuction, submuscular silicone implants, and ultrasound-guided fat grafting to achieve safe and aesthetic gluteal enhancements. This method is especially suitable for patients looking to augment both the central and lateral areas of the buttocks, particularly when they lack adequate fat tissue for augmentation through fat grafting. With the addition of ultrasound guidance, the fat grafting step is significantly safer.

Nonsurgical Gluteal Volume Correction with Hyaluronic Acid: A Retrospective Study to Assess Long-term Safety and Efficacy

Background: Augmentation and reshaping of body volume, particularly in the gluteal area, presents a significant challenge in aesthetic surgery. Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers have emerged as an effective and safe tool for such indications, but literature examining nonsurgical gluteal reshaping with HA remains limited. This study aims to evaluate the long-term safety of using recommended volumes of HA body fillers for nonsurgical gluteal augmentation. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was carried out across multiple centers in Italy and the United Arab Emirates. The study involved participants between 22 and 53 years of age who underwent gluteal augmentation using HA body filler (HYAcorp MLF1/2) between 2017 and 2021, with up to 4 years and 7 months of follow-up. Participants and investigators independently evaluated the procedure’s effectiveness by comparing pre- and posttreatment photographs. The Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale was used to assess posttreatment satisfaction by both participants and investigators. All adverse effects (AEs) were recorded. Results: The study included a diverse group of 91 participants. No serious adverse events were reported, with the majority of AE occurring shortly after treatment and resolving in 1 week. AEs were more frequently observed in participants with previous treatments using different substances in the treatment area. Conclusions: The real-world application of HA body filler (HYAcorp MLF1/2) for gluteal augmentation in the participants of this study showed the treatment’s effectiveness, with no severe adverse events reported among the participants. High levels of satisfaction were reported among both participants and investigators.

B-ultrasound-assisted gluteal fat grafting in Asians: A prospective study of quantitative results from three-dimensional imaging and B-ultrasound analysis

BackgroundThe increasing number of fatalities caused by gluteal fat grafting is concerning; thus, there is a need to determine ways to obtain the ideal aesthetic effect while ensuring a safe operation. In this study, three-dimensional (3D) measurements combined with B-ultrasound were used to evaluate the effect of gluteal fat augmentation in Asians, whose safety and effectiveness were confirmed using quantitative data. MethodsThirty-five consecutive female patients were evaluated in this prospective clinical study. All patients underwent B-ultrasound-assisted gluteal fat augmentation on the subcutaneous plane alone. 3D imaging and B-ultrasound analysis of the adipose tissue thickness in the gluteal region were performed preoperatively and at 1 week, 3 months and 6 months post-operatively. ResultsThe waist circumference of the patients decreased, gluteal circumference and length of the gluteal crease increased and average waist-to-hip ratio improved from 0.78 to 0.74. At 3 months and 6 months post-operatively, the adipose tissue thickness decreased by 5.1% and 15.1%, respectively. The fat retention rates calculated using 3D imaging measurements at 3 months and 6 months post-operatively were 77.9% and 64.7%, respectively. According to the BODY-Q scale scores, patients reported a high level of satisfaction post-operatively. ConclusionsB-ultrasound guidance can effectively prevent the occurrence of fatal fat embolism during gluteal fat grafting and maximise the augmentation effect. The quantitative data obtained using 3D measurements and B-ultrasound confirmed the safety and effectiveness of fat injections for gluteal augmentation under B-ultrasound guidance.

The Classification of Gluteal Augmentation.

Gluteal enhancement is a major growing trend within aesthetic surgery practice. Patient needs include volume augmentation and enhancement of the roundness of buttocks. In this letter we suggest a classification of gluteal augmentation procedures. The classification helps to analyze the case easier and applying the most adaptable procedure for each patient. Our classification of gluteal augmentation is divided to Pseudo-augmentation (illusionary) and Real (true) augmentation which is subdivided to Non-surgical and Surgical.

Buttock Augmentation with Ultrasonic Liposuction and Ultrasound-Guided Fat Grafting: A Retrospective Analysis Based on 185 Patients.

Background: The popularity of gluteal augmentation has surged in recent decades, primarily due to satisfactory aesthetic results. Objectives: The primary goal of this retrospective analysis was to present the key characteristics of a large patient cohort from Europe, comprising 185 female patients who underwent gluteal augmentation with ultrasound-guided fat grafting. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 185 female patients who underwent gluteal augmentation with ultrasonic liposuction and fat grafting from February 2020 to July 2023. The procedures were performed in accordance with the latest safety recommendations. Results: Information concerning the patient demographic, volume of fat graft, and complications was analyzed. Additionally, patient satisfaction was evaluated through a questionnaire. The mean Body Mass Index (BMI) of the patients was 23.00 kg/m2 (SD = 2.62). Furthermore, the volume of transferred fat graft ranged from 500.00 mL to 800.00 mL, with a mean of 596.75 mL (SD = 67.29). The most frequent complication was the formation of seroma (5.41%). All complications were treated successfully. Conclusions: Using ultrasonic liposuction and ultrasound-guided fat grafting to enhance buttock contours is a reliable technique. Nevertheless, it is crucial to exert caution and take all necessary steps to reduce the risk of potentially life-threatening complications.

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Papers on Gluteal Augmentation.

Gluteoplasty or gluteal augmentation is a popular cosmetic procedure that is used to improve the volume, shape, and contour of the buttocks. This bibliometric analysis aims to characterize emerging research trends and to assess the methodological quality of the highest impact gluteoplasty research. The 100 most-cited publications in gluteoplasty were identified on Web of Science, across all available journal years (from Inception to August 2023). Study details, including the citation count, main content focus, and outcome measures, were extracted and tabulated from each publication. Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine level of evidence (LOE) of each study was assessed. The 100 most-cited publications regarding gluteoplasty were cited by a total of 2375 publications. Citations per publication ranged from 5 to 176 (mean 23.75 ± 25.86), with the highest-cited study being authored by Simonacci, discussing autologous fat grafting (n = 176). Most publications were LOE 5 (n = 55), representative of the large number of case series and reports. The number of publications for LOE 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 1, 9, 13, and 22, respectively. The main content focus was "surgical technique" in 38 publications, followed by "outcomes" (n = 34) and "risk factors/prognosis" (n = 10). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were used in 20 publications, and 33 publications reported aesthetic outcome measures. This analysis demonstrates a need for improvement in research methodologies regarding gluteoplasty research. This advancement would be facilitated by robust, high-quality research through randomized control trials and multicenter studies, as well as the further development of validated PROMs for gluteoplasty.

Challenging Gluteal Augmentation Due to Late Complication of Permanent Filler: Case Report and Literature Review

Challenging Gluteal Augmentation Due to Late Complication of Permanent Filler: Case Report and Literature Review

Augmented Safety Profile of Ultrasound-Guided Gluteal Fat Transfer: Retrospective Study With 1815 Patients.

Gluteal augmentation with autologous fat transfer is one of the fastest growing aesthetic surgical procedures worldwide over the past decade. However, this procedure can be associated with high mortality from fatal pulmonary fat embolism events caused by intramuscular injection of fat. Ultrasound-guided fat grafting allows visualization of the transfer in the subcutaneous space, avoiding intramuscular injection. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of gluteal fat grafting performed with ultrasound-guided cannulation. A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing ultrasound-guided gluteal fat grafting at the authors' center between 2019 and 2022 was performed. All cases were performed by board-certified and board-eligible plastic surgeons under general anesthesia in ASA Class I or II patients. Fat was only transferred to the subcutaneous plane when over the gluteal muscle. Patients underwent postoperative follow-up from a minimum of 3 months up to 2 years. Results were analyzed with standard statistical tests. The study encompassed 1815 female patients with a median age of 34 years. Controlled medical comorbidities were present in 14%, with the most frequent being hypothyroidism (0.7%), polycystic ovarian syndrome (0.7%), anxiety (0.6%), and asthma (0.6%). Postoperative complications occurred in 4% of the total cohort, with the most common being seroma (1.2%), local skin ischemia (1.2%), and surgical site infection (0.8%). There were no macroscopic fat emboli complications or mortalities. These data suggest that direct visualization of anatomic plane injection through ultrasound guidance is associated with a low rate of complications. Ultrasound guidance is an efficacious adjunct to gluteal fat grafting and is associated with an improved safety profile that should be considered by every surgeon performing this procedure.

Safety and Efficacy Study of the Application of Redensified Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid for Filling Gluteal Volume and Cellulite Depressions.

To test the efficacy and safety of cross-linked hyaluronic acid application for filling buttocks and cellulite depressions and its permanence over time. For a period of a year, 25 patients were applied redensified cross-linked hyaluronic acid in the gluteal area. These patients were all 23-45-year-old women with little fat to be removed. The product used is composed of hyaluronic acid with high cross-linking and redensification which allows it to maintain shape and durability over time. All patients underwent tumescent anesthesia with neuroleptic sedation in the operating room. The procedure was regarded as minimal (container, sterile gloves, and surgical field). The amount applied for gluteal augmentation varied from 50 to 100 ml per application area and according to the patient's needs. For the filling of cellulite depressions, the application was up to 3 cc per depression and up to a total of 40 ml. The maximum volume used per patient in the buttocks did not exceed 200 ml, and it did not exceed 40 ml in cellulite depressions. A group of patients was treated in the upper and middle third of the buttocks in superficial and deep subcutaneous layers and in cellulite depressions. Very good results have been obtained without any major complications. The use of redensified cross-linked hyaluronic acid of non-animal origin is therefore an option for gluteal augmentation and cellulite depressions. Although the product degrades over time, after 12 months, 44% of treated patients rated their results as highly or very much improved, 36% as improved, 16% rated the improvement as poor, and one patient (4%) was dissatisfied. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Complications From Fat Grafting and Gluteal Augmentation in Outpatient Plastic Surgery: An Analysis of American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities (AAAASF, QUAD A) Data.

Gluteal augmentation with autologous fat grafting, colloquially referred to as Brazilian butt lift (BBL), is an increasingly common procedure with a highly reported complication profile. In this study we aimed to analyze the prevalence and characteristics of complications that accompanied these surgeries at ambulatory surgery facilities. Adults patients who experienced fat grafting complications from 2019 to 2021 were identified in QUAD A, formerly known as the American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities (AAAASF, Highland Park, IL, USA), database. Patients and complications were analyzed based on sociodemographic, surgery-, and facility-specific variables with descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Overall, 436 fat grafting procedures with complications were reported to QUAD A, with an overall complication rate of 0.94%. Of these complications, 164 (37.6%) were confirmed to be from gluteal augmentation procedures. Notably, the number of gluteal augmentation with fat grafting complications decreased from the year 2019 (48) to 2020 (36), then nearly doubled from 2020 to 2021 (69). The majority of patients were female (96.7%), with a mean age of 42.0 years and a mean BMI of 28.3 kg/m2. Wound infection was the most commonly documented complication (22.3%). Of the patients who experienced complications, 35.9% presented to a hospital for their complications and 12.6% required reoperation. Four deaths were described. There was no association between sociodemographic or surgical variables and increased odds of readmission or reoperation (P > .05), except for increasing surgeon number and reoperation (P = .02). Gluteal augmentation accounts for a large proportion of complications from fat grafting procedures. Increased reporting requirements may aid in future determination of incidences of complications and improve patient safety.

Injection of Silicone for Cosmetic Gluteal Augmentation Leading to Hypercalcemia

Injection of Silicone for Cosmetic Gluteal Augmentation Leading to Hypercalcemia

Gluteoplasty With Lumbar Gluteal Flap Associated With Liposuction and Fat Grafting: A Safe Technique for Massive Weight Loss Patients.

Weight loss leads to excessive flaccidity, volume loss, and tissue descent in the gluteal region. Translated autologous flaps during lower body lifting have been utilized in patients; they address sagging tissue and the lack of volume. However, sometimes use of these autologous flaps does not provide adequate gluteal projection, and a second procedure with fat injection may be required. The authors describe their technique of a lower body lift with a lumbosacral flap in association with liposuction and lipofilling for gluteoplasty. A prospective series of 23 post-bariatric surgery individuals who underwent a lower body lift with lumbosacral flap gluteal augmentation, liposuction, and lipofilling between January 2021 and September 2022 were described. The satisfaction rate and complications were assessed 6 months postoperatively with a validated questionnaire (BODY-Q scale). The patients had a mean age of 38.18 (range, 28-56 years) and median body mass index of 26. Four patients with dehiscence were diagnosed and treated conservatively. All wound breakdowns were observed in the paramedian plane of the torsoplasty. No reoperations were performed. The mean satisfaction percentage of the BODY-Q scale transformed score was 97.5. A technique for a lower body lift with buttock augmentation combined with liposuction and fat grafting was presented. In future studies other techniques to maximize gluteal contouring should be investigated.

FRI695 Hypercalcemia Mediated By Granulomatous Disease Due To Polymethylmethacrylate (pmma) Injection Utilization For Gluteal Augmentation

Abstract Disclosure: T. Mishra: None. J. Craven: None. Introduction: While etiologies for hypercalcemia commonly include hyperparathyroidism, malignancy or vitamin D intoxication, unusual causes should also be considered. We present a case that describes a patient who presented with hypercalcemia in the setting of granulomatous reaction to PMMA filler for gluteal augmentation. Clinical case: A 52 year old female with a past medical history of hypertension, stage III chronic kidney disease, nephrolithiasis, depression was admitted to the hospital with a peak calcium of 15.8 mg/dl (n: 8.4-10.4mg/dl). Hypercalcemia was incidentally noted while she was undergoing workup for her chronic kidney disease. Initial testing revealed PTH of 22 pg/ml (n: 22-94). 25 hydroxy vitamin D 24ng/ml, (n: 30-80), 1, 25 dihydroxy D2 markedly elevated at 258 pg/ml (n: 19-79). SPEP/UPEP normal. PTHrp was found to be 5.9 pmol/L(n: 0-3.4pmol/L). High-resolution CT chest did not show evidence of granulomatous disease or lung masses. A PET scan was obtained which showed extensive hypermetabolic activity in the bilateral gluteus medius and maximus muscle consistent with her history of PMMA injection for buttock augmentation. She was placed on aggressive maintenance intravenous fluid hydration. In addition, Lasix, zoledronic acid and calcitonin were administered. With these measures her calcium improved to a level of 10.7mg/dl. She did not tolerate high dose glucocorticoids. With her treatment intolerance and progressive renal disease in mind, plastic surgery has been consulted to explore surgical options for PMMA debulking. Conclusion: This represents a case of hypercalcemia mediated by elevated levels of calcitriol due to granulomatous inflammation caused by a foreign body reaction to PMMA injection. Polymethylmethacrylate is primarily used in South/Central America as a synthetic filling agent in cosmetic procedures, but is not FDA approved for gluteal injection. To our knowledge, there is only one other case report of MMA mediated hypercalcemia in the US. Given the rise in cosmetic tourism and the lag time between PMMA injection and development of hypercalcemia (mean time to presentation of 7 years), this complication is likely to become increasingly prevalent in North America. Presentation: Friday, June 16, 2023

Accurate Plane Fat Grafting in Gluteal Augmentation: An Anatomic Study.

The safety of gluteal fat grafting is a global concern in plastic surgery. The goal of this study was to test whether fat grafting to the buttocks with Auto Stop Reach (ASR) technology prevents penetration from the subcutaneous space into the fascia and muscle layers of the buttocks. Fat transfer simulation was performed with blue dye on 8 fresh tissue cadaver buttocks by 3 board-certified plastic surgeons (S.S.K., S.C., B.W.). An open control was utilized to visualize the process in the different anatomic layers, and all of the other procedures were performed blindly, akin to live surgery. After blue dye transfer reached maximum capacity (ranging from 400-800 mL per buttock), dissection of the anatomical layers of the buttocks was performed to determine the plane(s) of injection. Blue dye fat transfer injection to the buttocks did not penetrate the gluteal fascia or muscle layers from the subcutaneous space while using ASR. Auto Stop Reach technology supports the safety of gluteal fat transfer in the subcutaneous space by board-certified plastic surgeons.

A Novel Two-Step Ultrasound-Guided Technique for Anesthesia and Postsurgery Analgesia in Gluteal Augmentation Surgery.

In recent years, there has been an increase in demand for gluteal augmentation and reshaping surgeries with intramuscular implants which are becoming increasingly popular. Until now, this surgery was mainly performed under general anesthesia, but recently locoregional anesthesia techniques, such as tumescent local anesthesia, are being applied more and more. Today, the use of ultrasound for locoregional anesthesia and analgesia allows us to perform techniques that are increasingly precise and burdened with lower risks. In this report, we present a novel two-step ultrasound-guided technique combining a botox injection in the gluteus maximus four weeks before surgery and tumescent anesthesia with a cluneal nerveblock.Furthermore, the combination of anesthetic and analgesic techniques can guarantee a better result both in terms of surgical execution of the interventionand in reducing pain and improving patient comfort in the postoperative period.