Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Analogue Research Articles

What Is an L-Cell and How Do We Study the Secretory Mechanisms of the L-Cell?

Synthetic glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues are effective anti-obesity and anti-diabetes drugs. The beneficial actions of GLP-1 go far beyond insulin secretion and appetite, and include cardiovascular benefits and possibly also beneficial effects in neurodegenerative diseases. Considerable reserves of GLP-1 are stored in intestinal endocrine cells that potentially might be mobilized by pharmacological means to improve the body’s metabolic state. In recognition of this, the interest in understanding basic L-cell physiology and the mechanisms controlling GLP-1 secretion, has increased considerably. With a view to home in on what an L-cell is, we here present an overview of available data on L-cell development, L-cell peptide expression profiles, peptide production and secretory patterns of L-cells from different parts of the gut. We conclude that L-cells differ markedly depending on their anatomical location, and that the traditional definition of L-cells as a homogeneous population of cells that only produce GLP-1, GLP-2, glicentin and oxyntomodulin is no longer tenable. We suggest to sub-classify L-cells based on their differential peptide contents as well as their differential expression of nutrient sensors, which ultimately determine the secretory responses to different stimuli. A second purpose of this review is to describe and discuss the most frequently used experimental models for functional L-cell studies, highlighting their benefits and limitations. We conclude that no experimental model is perfect and that a comprehensive understanding must be built on results from a combination of models.

Effect of Various Dosing Conditions on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Semaglutide, a Human Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Analogue in a Tablet Formulation.

IntroductionOral semaglutide is a novel tablet formulation of the human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue semaglutide. In two trials, the effects of prior food ingestion (food effect), post-dose fasting period and water volume with dosing (dosing conditions) on oral semaglutide pharmacokinetics were investigated.MethodsSubjects received once-daily oral semaglutide for 10 days. In the food-effect trial, 78 healthy subjects were randomised 1:1:1 to fed (meal 30 min pre-dose; 240 mL water with dosing), fasting (overnight until 4 h post-dose; 240 mL) or reference (fasting overnight until 30 min post-dose; 120 mL) arms. In the dosing conditions trial, 161 healthy men were randomised into eight dosing groups (overnight fasted with 50/120 mL water and 15/30/60/120 min post-dose fasting). Semaglutide plasma concentrations were measured frequently until 504 h after the 10th dose.ResultsIn the food-effect trial, limited or no measurable semaglutide exposure was observed in the fed arm, while all subjects in the fasting arm had measurable semaglutide exposure. Area under the semaglutide concentration–time curve (AUC0–24h,semaglutide,day10) and maximum semaglutide concentration (Cmax,semaglutide,day10) were numerically greater by approximately 40% for the fasting versus reference arm (p = 0.082 and p = 0.080, respectively). In the dosing conditions trial, AUC0–24h,semaglutide,day10 and Cmax,semaglutide,day10 were not different between water volumes (p = 0.541 and p = 0.676), but increased with longer post-dose fasting (p < 0.001).ConclusionAdministration of oral semaglutide in the fasting state with up to 120 mL water and at least 30 min post-dose fasting results in clinically relevant semaglutide exposure. These dosing conditions have been used in the oral semaglutide phase 3 trials and are part of the approved label.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT02172313, NCT01572753.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-021-01078-y.

227-LB: GLP-1 Activation of HCN Channels Increases Glucose-Stimulated β- and δ- Cell Ca2+ Oscillation Frequency

Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels control human β-cell insulin secretion. Here, we examined if HCN channels impact glucagon-like-peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor modulation of islet Ca2+ handling. We found that Liraglutide (100nM LIRA), a GLP-1 analog, increased mouse β-cell Ca2+ oscillation frequency and cAMP levels in high (11 mM) but not low glucose. Similarly, a subset of human β-cells (65%) show LIRA-induced elevations in Ca2+ oscillation frequency (by 70%, P&amp;lt;0.001) under stimulatory glucose (7 mM) conditions. While mouse islet HCN inhibition (20 μM ivabradine) did not alter glucose-stimulated (9 mM) Ca2+ oscillation frequency, it prevented LIRA-induced changes of islet Ca2+ fluctuations. As LIRA is used to treat type-2-diabetes, we examined and demonstrated that islets from high fat diet-fed, glucose intolerant mice also responded to LIRA with increased Ca2+ oscillation frequency (by 93%, P&amp;lt;0.01). These changes in β-cell Ca2+ handling may contribute to LIRA-mediated increased insulin secretion, which could also play a role in LIRA inhibition of glucagon secretion. However, as somatostatin also inhibits glucagon secretion, we next investigated the influence of LIRA on &amp;#120575;;-cells. Interestingly, LIRA increased Ca2+ oscillation frequency equivalently in β- and &amp;#120575;;-cells (by 85%, P&amp;lt;0.0001), which showed synchronized Ca2+ fluctuations. To establish the origin of synchronization cues, we ablated either β- or δ-cells and determined the LIRA-mediated effect on Ca2+ handling in remaining δ- or β-cells, respectively. Although δ-cell ablation did not affect the LIRA-mediated elevations in β-cell Ca2+ oscillation frequency, β-cell ablation interfered with glucose- and LIRA-mediated δ-cell Ca2+ fluctuations. As the kinetics of pulsatile insulin secretion dictate insulin sensitivity, the data presented here suggests that GLP-1 stimulation of islet HCN channels may improve peripheral insulin sensitivity in diabetics treated with LIRA. Disclosure K. E. Zaborska: None. K. L. Jordan: None. P. Dadi: None. M. Dickerson: None. S. M. Graff: None. D. Jacobson: None.

645-P: Mobile Health Application as a Real-World Data Resource: Self-Recorded Weight Reduction with Once-Weekly Semaglutide

A mobile health application (mHealth app) with treatment planning, body weight and dose tracking features has been developed to support patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating once-weekly (OW) semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analog. Here, we assess app users’ self-recorded weight loss (WL) data.Of 2,820 active users (≤3 consecutive weeks without interacting with [opening] the app over the 12-week initiation period), 1,506 had at least four recorded weight entries and were included in the analysis. Baseline weight was defined as the first weight reported between weeks 1 and 2 after initiating treatment; subsequent reported weights were averaged over 2-week intervals. Mean weight over time (up to 18 weeks) was estimated using a mixed model for repeated measurement. Of 1,506 users, 1,090 had baseline measurements (mean 102.0 kg), and 907 had week 17-18 measurements (mean 97.3 kg).The mean self-reported WL was 4.55% (4.65 kg; p<0.0001) from baseline to week 18 (Figure). A sensitivity analysis for users reporting a baseline weight (n=1,090), showed similar mean WL (4.53% [4.60 kg]). The results are in line with those from real-world evidence (RWE) studies like SPARE (retrospective) and SURE (prospective).These findings suggest that mHealth app data can complement OW semaglutide RWE programs in T2D treatment.View largeDownload slideView largeDownload slide DisclosureU. Bodholdt: None. S. Birot: Employee; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. A. Catarig: Employee; Self; Novo Nordisk. U. Erhan: Employee; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. F. K. Knop: Advisory Panel; Self; MSD Corporation, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk A/S, Pharmacosmos, Zealand Pharma A/S, Research Support; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S, Zealand Pharma A/S, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, MSD Corporation, Novo Nordisk A/S.FundingNovo Nordisk A/S

660-P: Greater Proportions of Subjects Achieved Composite Endpoints with Once-Weekly Semaglutide vs. Comparators in SUSTAIN Trials

Achieving HbA1c targets, weight loss (WL) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) reductions lowers micro- and macrovascular risk in type 2 diabetes (T2D). In SUSTAIN clinical trials, once-weekly (OW) semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analog, significantly reduced HbA1c and body weight (BW) and reduced SBP (except in SUSTAIN 8) vs. comparators. This post hoc analysis evaluated composites of these endpoints with semaglutide vs. comparators in SUSTAIN 1-5 and 7-10.Trials were analyzed individually to determine the proportion of subjects achieving composite endpoints A (HbA1c <7.0%, WL ≥5%, SBP reduction ≥5 mmHg) and B (HbA1c ≤6.5%, WL ≥10%, SBP reduction ≥5 mmHg). On-treatment-without-rescue-medication data were used.Across the trials, mean baseline HbA1c, BW and SBP ranges were 8.0-8.4%, 89.5-96.9 kg and 127.9-136.4 mmHg, respectively. Greater proportions of subjects achieved the composite endpoints with semaglutide vs. comparator (A: 12.4-19.1% [0.5 mg]; 18.9-36.7% [1.0 mg] vs. 0.8-15.7% [comparator]; B: 2.5-8.0% [0.5 mg]; 5.0-14.8% [1.0 mg] vs. 0.2-3.0% [comparator]; p<0.05 for both endpoints; Figure).Significantly greater proportions of subjects achieved clinically relevant composite endpoints with OW semaglutide vs. comparators, including more stringent endpoint of HbA1c ≤6.5% and WL ≥10%. These data may assist clinicians in their decision-making in T2D care.View largeDownload slideView largeDownload slide DisclosureP. Gæde: None. A. Catarig: Employee; Self; Novo Nordisk. K. M. Dungan: Advisory Panel; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Tolerion, Inc., Consultant; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Elsevier, Novo Nordisk, Other Relationship; Self; UpToDate, Research Support; Self; Abbott, Sanofi-Aventis, Viacyte, Inc. C. Hindsberger: Consultant; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S, Stock/Shareholder; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S, Stock/Shareholder; Spouse/Partner; Novo Nordisk A/S. J. Øllgaard: Employee; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. S. C. Bain: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Lilly Diabetes, Napp Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Consultant; Self; ADOCIA, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Bayer AG, Medscape, WebMD LLC.FundingNovo Nordisk A/S

103-OR: The Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Analog, Liraglutide Is a Safe and Effective Treatment of Bile Acid Malabsorption: A Proof of Concept Study

Bile acid malabsorption (BAM) is caused by excessive spill-over of bile acids to the colon and is estimated to affect ∼1% of the general population. It is a socially debilitating disease with watery diarrhea and high stool frequency as main symptoms. BAM is diagnosed by the 75selenium homotaurocholic acid test (SeHCAT) measuring the retention of bile acids. Bile acid sequestrant (BAS) treatment, which is the only recommended treatment of BAM, is associated with poor effect and low compliance. Case reports suggest that the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor analog (GLP-1RA) liraglutide may be an effective treatment of BAM. In this double-blind, double-dummy, non-inferiority study, nondiabetic individuals with SeHCAT-verified BAM, age 18-75 years and BMI 18.5-40 kg/m2 were randomized to receive the GLP-1RA liraglutide (uptitrated to 1.8 mg per day) or the BAS colesevelam (1.875 mg × 2 per day) for 6 weeks prior to a 7-day run-in period without treatment. SeHCAT was made at baseline, week 3 and week 6. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients experiencing a reduction in stool frequency of ≥25% per day. Of 52 randomized subjects (18 males, 34 females, mean age 50.2 years and BMI 29.9 kg/m2), one patient from each group dropped out due to gastrointestinal side effects. At end-of-treatment, 20 (77%) individuals on liraglutide had experienced a reduction in stool frequency of ≥25% per day vs. 13 (50%) on colesevelam treatment, corresponding to a statistically superior risk difference of -0.27 (one-sided 95% CI: -1; -0.06). In contrast to the colesevelam-treated group, the liraglutide-treated group exhibited a significant increase in SeHCAT values resulting in significantly higher values at end-of-treatment (mean (SD) 8.9 (7.3) vs. 0.9 (2.0) %, P&amp;lt;0.0001). In conclusion, we show that liraglutide enhances the reabsorption of bile acids and constitutes a safe and effective treatment of BAM which is superior compared to current standard of care (colesevelam). Disclosure M. L. Kårhus: None. A. Brønden: None. J. Forman: None. A. Haaber: None. E. Langholz: None. T. Vilsbøll: Consultant; Self; Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Lilly Diabetes, Merck Sharp &amp; Dohme Corp., Mundipharma International, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. D. P. Sonne: None. F. K. Knop: Advisory Panel; Self; MSD Corporation, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk A/S, Pharmacosmos, Zealand Pharma A/S, Research Support; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S, Zealand Pharma A/S, Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, MSD Corporation, Novo Nordisk A/S. Funding Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF17OC0029710); A.P. Møller and Chastine Mc-Kinney Møller Foundation (19-L-0002)

Exendin-4 differentially modulates essential functions of human dermal fibroblasts under normoglycemic and hyperglycemic conditions.

Evidence that exendin-4, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analog, might be used to treat poorly healing wounds under diabetic and nondiabetic conditions has gained increasing interest. Little is known, however, about the effects of the drug on the production by dermal fibroblasts of key extracellular matrix and regulatory compounds. Therefore, we used human skin fibroblasts cultured in normo- (1 g/l = 5.6 mmol/l glucose) or hyperglycemic (4.5 g/l = 25 mmol/l glucose) culture medium to test the effects of exendin-4 (0 - 100 nmol/l) on fibroblast functions crucial for the wound healing process. Exendin-4 increased the proliferative and metabolic activities, as measured by the BrdU (bromodeoxyuridine) and MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) assays, respectively, of fibroblasts cultured in normoglycemic medium. Under hyperglycemic conditions, the drug had no effect on proliferation and reduced metabolic fibroblast activity. Exendin-4 decreased metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) secretion in the normoglycemic milieu only and increased tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) concentration in fibroblast colonies under both normo- and hyperglycemic experimental conditions. Exendin-4 increased the fibroblast growth factor-1 (FGF-1) concentration in cell colonies maintained in the normoglycemic milieu but decreased FGF-1 release when fibroblasts were grown in hyperglycemic medium. High glucose caused lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) leakage when compared with normoglycemic conditions, and exendin-4 was not able to prevent this effect, although it reduced LDH release from fibroblasts cultured in normoglycemic medium. Finally, exendin-4 increased glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content under both experimental conditions. Our results indicate that exendin-4 effects on the production of the extracellular matrix and regulatory proteins differ in human skin fibroblasts exposed to either normal or high glucose. In general, the beneficial effects of the drug, which may be important for the improvement of wound healing, are more pronounced under normoglycemic conditions, thus indicating that hyperglycemia attenuates the positive effects of exendin-4 on fibroblasts.

Liraglutide (Saxenda®) for the treatment of obesity: a commentary on NICE Technology Appraisal 664

Saxenda, Liraglutide 3.0 mg, is a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue that is licensed for the treatment of adults with overweight and obesity. In this commentary we review the NICE technology appraisal (TA664) on the use of Saxenda in the National Health Service (NHS) and its implication in clinical practice.

Approach to Obesity in the Older Population.

Until recently, weight loss in older obese people was feared because of ensuing muscle loss and frailty. Facing overall increasing longevity, high rates of obesity in older individuals (age ≥ 65 years) and a growing recognition of the health and functional cost of the number of obesity years, abetted by evidence that intentional weight loss in older obese people is safe, this approach is gradually, but not unanimously, being replaced by more active principles. Lifestyle interventions that include reduced but sufficient energy intake, age-adequate protein and micronutrient intake, coupled with aerobic and resistance exercise tailored to personal limitations, can induce weight loss with improvement in frailty indices. Sustained weight loss at this age can prevent or ameliorate diabetes. More active steps are controversial. The use of weight loss medications, particularly glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs (liraglutide as the first example), provides an additional treatment tier. Its safety and cardiovascular health benefits have been convincingly shown in older obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In our opinion, this option should not be denied to obese individuals with prediabetes or other obesity-related comorbidities based on age. Finally, many reports now provide evidence that bariatric surgery can be safely performed in older people as the last treatment tier. Risk-benefit issues should be considered with extreme care and disclosed to candidates. The selection process requires good presurgical functional status, individualized consideration of the sequels of obesity, and reliance on centers that are highly experienced in the surgical procedure as well as short-term and long-term subsequent comprehensive care and support.

Comparative effects of incretin-based therapy on early-onset diabetic nephropathy in rats: Role of TNF-α, TGF-β and c-caspase-3

AimsDiabetic nephropathy, a major threat to diabetic patients, is considered as the main reason for end-stage renal disease. Fortunately, incretin-based therapy has been aroused as considerable source to attenuate diabetic renal damage. This study aimed to investigate whether superior protective effects on the progression of diabetic kidney are exerted by glucagon-like peptide-1 analog, exenatide, or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin. Materials and methodsMale Wistar rats were fed high-fat diet for 2 weeks followed by injection of low dose streptozotocin to induce type 2 diabetes mellitus. Four weeks after induction of diabetes, diabetic rats were administered vehicle, exenatide (5 μg/kg/day, SC) or sitagliptin (10 mg/kg/day, orally) for 4 weeks. Key findingsDifferent incretin mimetic agents improved renal function as evident by significant decreases in serum creatinine and urea levels with decline in urinary microalbuminuria and marked improvement in histological alterations. Both treated diabetic rats also exhibited a significant improvement in metabolic intolerance with more pronounced effect of exenatide on glucose regulation. Ameliorated renal oxidative stress alongside significant downregulation in transforming growth factor-beta, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and cleaved-caspase-3 protein expressions in renal tissues were recorded in treated diabetic rats. SignificanceAdministration of either exenatide or sitagliptin showed ameliorative effects on early diabetic nephropathy without notable differences between their renal protective effects. However, further clinical studies are still required to ensure their comparative promising effects on the management of renal complication of diabetes.

Intensive management of obesity in people with severe chronic kidney disease: A review

Obesity is highly prevalent worldwide, including among people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The presence of severe and/or end-stage kidney disease complicates the treatment of obesity for several reasons, including restrictions on protein and fluid intake and renal excretion of several medications indicated for the treatment of obesity. The aim of this review is to assess the safety of intensive obesity treatments, such as very-low-energy diets (VLEDs), obesity pharmacotherapy and/or bariatric surgery, in people with end-stage kidney disease. A literature search was conducted to identify studies reporting safety outcomes for VLEDs, liraglutide, phentermine, phentermine-topiramate, naltrexone-bupropion and bariatric surgery in people with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 30 mL/min/1.73m2 or on dialysis. Limited data were insufficient to recommend VLEDs but highlighted their potential efficacy and the need for close clinical and biochemical monitoring. There were no data regarding centrally acting obesity pharmacotherapy in this population, although some glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues appear to safely induce weight loss at doses used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Some studies suggest an increased rate of complications of bariatric surgery in individuals with severe or end-stage CKD. Further prospective evaluation of intensive obesity management in the growing population with obesity and severe, end-stage and dialysis-dependent CKD is required.

Effects of Glucagon-Like-Peptide-1 Analogue Treatment in Genetic Obesity

Introduction: Obesity is highly prevalent, comes with serious health burden and is difficult to treat. In a minority, there is a genetic cause for the obesity. In these patients, therapy-resistant obesity is often observed despite intensive lifestyle treatment. Moreover, it is still unclear whether bariatric surgery is less successful in genetic obesity. Liraglutide is a Glucagon-Like-Peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist or GLP-1 analogue, showing positive effects on metabolic parameters, satiety and weight loss in lifestyle-induced obesity. We present our experiences of GLP-1 analogue treatment in patients with genetic obesity disorders. Methods: Adults with overweight or severe obesity and a molecularly proven genetic cause were treated with liraglutide 3,0 mg daily, in addition to ongoing intensive supportive lifestyle treatment. Anthropometrics, metabolic parameters, resting energy expenditure (REE), side effects, and subjectively reported satiety and quality of life were assessed. Results: Two patients with a heterozygous pathogenic melanocortin 4 recepter variant and two patients with 16p11.2 deletion syndrome, ranging in age between 21 and 32 years and in BMI between 28.1 and 55.7 kg/m2 at baseline, were treated. At end of follow-up, ranging between 33 weeks and 12 years, a mean change in BMI and waist circumference was observed of -5.7 ± 3.8 kg/m2 and -15.2 ± 21.1 cm, respectively. All patients reported better quality of life, three of them also reported improved satiety. Moreover, improvement of metabolic parameters was seen. No clear effect on REE was observed. Two patients experienced mild side effects, e.g. nausea and stomach pain, for a brief period. Conclusion: We here show beneficial effects of GLP-1 analogues on weight, metabolic parameters, and quality of life in four patients with genetic obesity. Satiety improved in three of the four patients. All patient achieved at least the clinically relevant 5–10% weight loss. Our findings suggest that GLP-1 analogue treatment might be an effective treatment option, in addition to a healthy lifestyle, for patients with genetic obesity.

Challenges in Implementing Evidence Based Cross-Disciplinary Therapies: Are Cardiovascular Specialists Ready to Claim SGLT-2 Inhibitors and GLP-1 Analogs?

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity, mortality and financial burden to the United States health system. A change in focus towards preventive medicine along with advances in pharmacologic and invasive therapies, has led to improved cardiac death rates. These benefits however, come with increased prevalence of heart failure and soaring readmission rates. Reducing burden of hospitalizations has therefore, been a focus of clinicians and researchers over the years. An improvement in clinical outcomes has been demonstrated in multiple trials investigating HF therapies, however, execution of guideline recommendations has been trailing. Over the past decade, 2 classes of hypoglycemic agents, the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have been recognized for their cardiovascular morbidity and mortality benefits. Studies have shown that there has been a steady increase in prescription rates of these medications, however, overall usage remains quite low. Various patient, physician and system-based factors have been identified that cause barriers to translation of trial data to real-world clinical outcomes. A strategy focused on physician and patient education, quality improvement, multi-disciplinary team approach, and patient centered care is essential to meet treatment goals.

Impact of Semaglutide on Body Composition in Adults With Overweight or Obesity: Exploratory Analysis of the STEP 1 Study

Background: Central obesity is associated with increased risk of cardiometabolic disease. Weight loss reduces lean muscle mass, potentially impacting resting energy expenditure and/or physical functioning. This analysis of the STEP 1 trial evaluated the impact of subcutaneous (s.c.) semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, on body composition in adults with overweight/obesity using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Methods: In STEP 1, 1961 adults aged ≥18 years with body mass index (BMI) ≥27 kg/m2 with ≥1 weight-related comorbidity or BMI ≥30 kg/m2, without diabetes, were randomized to s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg once-weekly or matched placebo (2:1) for 68 weeks, plus lifestyle intervention. Participants with BMI ≤40 kg/m2 from 9 sites were eligible for the substudy. Total fat mass, total lean body mass and regional visceral fat mass were measured using DEXA at screening and week 68; visceral fat mass was calculated in the L4 region (both males/females), android region (males), or gynoid region (females), depending on site scanner methodology. Proportions of total fat and lean body mass are shown relative to total body mass; proportion of visceral fat mass is expressed relative to region assessed. Results: This analysis included 140 participants (semaglutide n=95; placebo n=45) (mean weight 98.4 kg, BMI 34.8 kg/m2; 76% female). Baseline body composition was similar in those receiving semaglutide and placebo (total fat mass proportion: 43.4% vs 44.6%; regional visceral fat mass proportion: 33.8% vs 36.3%; total lean body mass proportion: 53.9% vs 52.7%; respectively). Percentage change in body weight from baseline to week 68 was -15.0% with semaglutide vs -3.6% with placebo. This resulted in reductions from baseline with semaglutide in total fat mass (-19.3%) and regional visceral fat mass (-27.4%), leading to 3.5%-point and 2.0%-point reductions in the proportions of total fat mass and visceral fat mass, respectively. Total lean body mass decreased from baseline (-9.7%); however, the proportion relative to total body mass increased by 3.0%-points. An increasing improvement in lean body mass:fat mass ratio was seen with semaglutide with increasing weight loss from baseline to week 68 (continuous data). Overall, the ratio increased from baseline (1.34 [95% CI: 1.22, 1.47]) to week 68 by 0.23 [0.14, 0.32], with greater improvement in those with ≥15% weight loss (n=44; 0.41 [0.28, 0.53]) vs <15% weight loss (n=39; 0.03 [-0.05, 0.12]) (observed, dichotomized data; no imputation for missing data). There were no major changes in body composition with placebo from baseline to week 68. Conclusion: In adults with overweight/obesity, semaglutide 2.4 mg was associated with reduced total fat mass and regional visceral fat mass, and an increased proportion of lean body mass. Greater weight loss was associated with greater improvement in body composition (lean body mass:fat mass ratio).

Weight Loss Maintenance With Once-Weekly Semaglutide 2.4 MG in Adults With Overweight or Obesity Reaching Maintenance Dose (STEP 4)

Background: In people with overweight or obesity, long-term maintenance of weight loss is challenging. Subcutaneous (s.c.) semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, has shown clinically-relevant weight loss in a phase 2 trial in people with obesity. STEP 4 investigated the impact of continued semaglutide 2.4 mg treatment, vs switching to placebo, on maintenance of weight loss in participants who reached 2.4 mg of semaglutide during a run-in period. Methods: This was a 68-week withdrawal trial (NCT03548987) in 902 subjects aged ≥18 years with body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 (or BMI ≥27 kg/m2 with ≥1 weight-related comorbidity), without diabetes. Following a 20 week run-in period, 803 subjects who reached the maintenance dose of once-weekly (OW) s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg were randomized 2:1 to continue treatment with semaglutide 2.4 mg or switch to placebo for 48 weeks, both as adjunct to lifestyle intervention. The primary endpoint was percentage change in body weight between randomization (week 20) and week 68. Confirmatory secondary endpoints included change in waist circumference and systolic blood pressure. Two estimands were defined: treatment policy and trial product; results are presented for the treatment policy estimand, unless stated otherwise. Results: Mean body weight (±SD) was 107.2 ±22.7 kg at week 0 and 96.1 ±22.6 kg at randomization (week 20; mean change -10.6%). Randomized participants were mostly female (79%) and white (84%); mean age was 46 years and mean BMI was 34.4 kg/m2. Between weeks 20–68, estimated mean body weight change was −7.9% vs +6.9% for semaglutide 2.4 mg vs placebo (estimated treatment difference [ETD]: −14.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −16.0, −13.5; p<0.0001), and -8.8% vs 6.5%, respectively, for the trial product estimand (ETD: -15.3%; 95% CI: -16.5, -14.1; p<0.0001). For participants randomized to continue semaglutide, the estimated change in body weight from week 0–68 was -17.4% (-18.2% for trial product estimand). Continued semaglutide treatment (weeks 20–68) led to clinically-relevant improvements in waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, BMI, HbA1c, FPG, and lipids (total cholesterol, LDL, VLDL, and triglycerides) vs switching to placebo (p<0.0001 for all). During the run-in period, 5.3% of participants discontinued treatment due to adverse events; during the randomized period, 2.4% (semaglutide) and 2.2% (placebo) discontinued. Nausea, diarrhea and constipation (mostly transient and mild-to-moderate) were the most frequent adverse events with semaglutide. Conclusion: In adults with overweight or obesity, continued treatment after dose escalation with OW s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg until week 68 led to clinically-relevant weight loss, while switching to placebo led to significant weight regain; these data underscore the chronicity and relapsing nature of obesity, and the need for continued treatment.

Clinically-Relevant Weight Loss is Achieved Independently of Early Weight Loss Response to Once-Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide 2.4 MG (STEP 4)

Background: Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, is being investigated in people with overweight or obesity. A post-hoc analysis of the STEP 4 trial was conducted to identify whether early weight loss is predictive of later weight loss with maintenance once-weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) semaglutide 2.4 mg. Methods: STEP 4 was a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 withdrawal trial (NCT03548987). Adults aged ≥18 years with either body mass index (BMI) ≥27 kg/m2 with ≥1 weight-related comorbidity or BMI ≥30 kg/m2, without type 2 diabetes, underwent a 20-week run-in period. Participants reaching the maintenance dose of once-weekly s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg at week 20 (regardless of weight loss achieved) were randomized 2:1 to semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo, as adjunct to lifestyle intervention, for an additional 48 weeks. Percent change in body weight from week 0 to 68 was estimated using a mixed model for repeated measurements analysis with treatment, week 20 responder status, and the interaction between treatment and week 20 responder status as factors, and baseline body weight as a covariate, all nested within visit (based on the trial product estimand [treatment effect assuming treatment adherence and without use of rescue intervention] for the on-treatment period). Participants were considered responders if they achieved ≥5% weight loss at week 20. Whether the week 20 response to semaglutide predicted the achievement of clinically-relevant weight loss (≥5%) by week 68 was also assessed. Results: In STEP 4, 902 participants initiated semaglutide at week 0, of whom 803 were randomized at week 20 (semaglutide: n=535, placebo: n=268; characteristics at week 0 for all randomized participants: mean age 46 years, body weight 107.2 kg, BMI 38.4 kg/m2; 79.0% female; 83.7% white). For the 88.0% of participants randomized to semaglutide and who were responders at week 20, mean body weight change from week 0 to 68 was -19.7%. For non-responders at week 20, mean body weight change was -6.4% with continued semaglutide vs -0.3% with switch to placebo. Of all participants randomized to semaglutide, 86.2% achieved a clinically-relevant weight loss (≥5%) at week 68. Being a responder at week 20 was highly predictive of achieving this outcome (positive predictive value: 96.4%), whereas being a non-responder at week 20 had limited predictive value (negative predictive value: 42.9%). Conclusion: In the STEP 4 trial, the vast majority of participants who were randomized to the maintenance dose of once-weekly s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg at week 20 had lost ≥5% body weight by week 68, with most achieving this by week 20. Overall weight loss with semaglutide was greater among early responders, but non-responders also achieved a clinically-relevant weight loss by week 68 if semaglutide treatment was continued.

Once-weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide 2.4 mg Reduces Body Weight in Adults with Overweight or Obesity Regardless of Baseline Characteristics (STEP 1)

Background: Semaglutide is a long-acting, subcutaneous (s.c.), glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue that is currently being investigated for obesity management in adults with overweight or obesity in the phase 3 STEP clinical trial program. Varying degrees of weight loss were observed with once-weekly s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg in STEP 1, and a post-hoc analysis was conducted to investigate weight loss in subgroups of participants based on their baseline characteristics. Methods: STEP 1 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (NCT03548935). Adults aged ≥18 years with either body mass index (BMI) ≥27 kg/m2 with ≥1 weight-related comorbidity or BMI ≥30 kg/m2, without type 2 diabetes, were randomized 2:1 to 68 weeks’ treatment with once-weekly s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo, as adjunct to lifestyle intervention. A descriptive evaluation of categorical weight loss with semaglutide from baseline to week 68 (≥20%, 15-<20%, 10-<15%, 5-<10%) by baseline characteristics (age, sex, race [White, Asian, Black or African American, other], body weight, BMI, waist circumference, and glycemic status [normo-glycemia, pre-diabetes]) was conducted. Mean percent weight loss with semaglutide from baseline to week 68 was analyzed separately by sex (male, female) and baseline body weight (≥115 kg, 100-<115 kg, 90-<100 kg, <90 kg) using a mixed model for repeated measurements analysis with treatment, subgroup (of sex or baseline body weight), and the interaction between treatment and subgroup as factors, and baseline body weight as a covariate, all nested within visit (based on the trial product estimand [treatment effect assuming treatment adherence and without use of rescue intervention] for the on-treatment period). Results: STEP 1 included 1,961 randomized participants (mean age 46 years, body weight 105.3 kg, BMI 37.9 kg/m2; 74.1% female). For categorical weight loss, the observed proportions of participants with ≥20%, 15-<20%, 10-<15%, and 5-<10% weight loss at week 68 were 34.8%, 19.9%, 20.0%, and 17.5% with semaglutide vs 2.0%, 3.0%, 6.8%, and 21.2% with placebo, respectively. The distribution of participants across weight loss groups did not appear to be affected by any baseline characteristics, except sex and baseline body weight. Mean percent weight loss at week 68 with semaglutide was greater among females than males, and in participants with lower vs higher baseline body weight. Sex and baseline body weight were independently associated with weight loss with semaglutide vs placebo at week 68 (p<0.001 for both tests for subgroup interactions). Conclusion: In STEP 1, weight loss with once-weekly s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg was seen in all subgroups evaluated, and was generally not influenced by baseline characteristics. The exception was sex and baseline body weight; female sex and a low baseline body weight were associated with a greater response to semaglutide.

Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide 2.4 MG in Adults With Overweight or Obesity (STEP 1)

Background: Despite the increasing global adverse health impact of obesity, there are few pharmacological options for effective weight management. STEP 1 investigated the efficacy and safety of the glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, subcutaneous (s.c.) semaglutide, for weight management in adults with overweight or obesity. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial was conducted at 129 sites across 16 countries (NCT03548935). Adults aged ≥18 years with either body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 or BMI ≥27 kg/m2 with ≥1 weight-related comorbidity, without type 2 diabetes, were randomized 2:1 to 68 weeks’ treatment with once-weekly s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo, both as adjunct to lifestyle intervention. The co-primary endpoints were percentage change in body weight and achievement of weight loss ≥5%. Cardiometabolic risk factors, patient-reported outcomes, and safety/tolerability were also assessed. Two estimands were defined: treatment policy (effect regardless of treatment adherence and use of rescue intervention) and trial product (effect assuming treatment adherence and without rescue intervention); results are presented for the treatment policy estimand, unless stated otherwise. P values for parameters marked with # were not controlled for multiplicity. Results: 1961 randomized participants (mean age 46 years, body weight 105.3 kg, BMI 37.9 kg/m2; 74.1% female) were included. Mean body weight change from baseline to week 68 was −14.9% in the semaglutide group vs −2.4% with placebo (estimated treatment difference [ETD]: −12.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI): −13.4, −11.5; p<0.0001). Similar results were obtained with the trial product estimand: mean body weight change# was -16.9% for semaglutide vs -2.4% for placebo (ETD: -14.4%; 95% CI: -15.3, -13.6; p<0.0001). Participants were more likely to achieve weight loss ≥5%, ≥10%, ≥15%, and ≥20%# with semaglutide vs placebo (86.4% vs 31.5%, 69.1% vs 12.0%, 50.5% vs 4.9%, and 32.0% vs 1.7%, respectively; p<0.0001 for all). Greater improvements were seen with semaglutide vs placebo in waist circumference, BMI#, systolic and diastolic# blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin#, fasting plasma glucose#, C-reactive protein#, fasting lipid profile#, and self-reported physical functioning (p<0.05 for all). No new safety signals with semaglutide were observed. The most frequent adverse events with semaglutide were gastrointestinal disorders (typically transient and mild-to-moderate). Conclusion: In adults with overweight or obesity, once-weekly s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg plus lifestyle intervention induced a mean weight loss of approximately 15% by week 68. Clinically beneficial weight loss of ≥10% was achieved by over two-thirds of participants and ≥20% by one-third of participants, along with associated improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors and physical functioning.

Fat-Secreted Ceramides Regulate Vascular Redox State and Influence Outcomes in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease

BackgroundObesity is associated with increased cardiovascular risk; however, the potential role of dysregulations in the adipose tissue (AT) metabolome is unknown. ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to explore the role of dysregulation in the AT metabolome on vascular redox signaling and cardiovascular outcomes. MethodsA screen was conducted for metabolites differentially secreted by thoracic AT (ThAT) and subcutaneous AT in obese patients with atherosclerosis (n = 48), and these metabolites were then linked with dysregulated vascular redox signaling in 633 patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. The underlying mechanisms were explored in human aortic endothelial cells, and their clinical value was tested against hard clinical endpoints. ResultsBecause ThAT volume was associated significantly with arterial oxidative stress, there were significant differences in sphingolipid secretion between ThAT and subcutaneous AT, with C16:0-ceramide and derivatives being the most abundant species released within adipocyte-derived extracellular vesicles. High ThAT sphingolipid secretion was significantly associated with reduced endothelial nitric oxide bioavailability and increased superoxide generated in human vessels. Circulating C16:0-ceramide correlated positively with ThAT ceramides, dysregulated vascular redox signaling, and increased systemic inflammation in 633 patients with atherosclerosis. Exogenous C16:0-ceramide directly increased superoxide via tetrahydrobiopterin-mediated endothelial nitric oxide synthase uncoupling and dysregulated protein phosphatase 2 in human aortic endothelial cells. High plasma C16:0-ceramide and its glycosylated derivative were independently related with increased risk for cardiac mortality (adjusted hazard ratios: 1.394; 95% confidence interval: 1.030 to 1.886; p = 0.031 for C16:0-ceramide and 1.595; 95% confidence interval: 1.042 to 2.442; p = 0.032 for C16:0-glycosylceramide per 1 SD). In a randomized controlled clinical trial, 1-year treatment of obese patients with the glucagon-like peptide-1 analog liraglutide suppressed plasma C16:0-ceramide and C16:0-glycosylceramide changes compared with control subjects. ConclusionsThese results demonstrate for the first time in humans that AT-derived ceramides are modifiable regulators of vascular redox state in obesity, with a direct impact on cardiac mortality in advanced atherosclerosis. (The Interaction Between Appetite Hormones; NCT02094183)

Use of non-insulin antidiabetic drugs in children and young adults - A Scandinavian drug utilization study from 2010-2019.

Knowledge on utilization patterns of non-insulin antidiabetic drugs in childhood and youth is limited. Therefore, we conducted a population-based drug utilization study using publicly available aggregate data on use of non-insulin antidiabetics from 2010 to 2019 in Scandinavia (Denmark, Norway and Sweden) in individuals aged up to 24 years. For each non-insulin antidiabetic drug, we calculated the annual prevalence proportion of users, overall and for specific age groups. From 2010 to 2019, the prevalence of non-insulin antidiabetic users in Scandinavia increased 37% from 0.43 to 0.59/1000 individuals. The prevalence proportions were highest among female adolescents and young adults, but the largest relative increase in use was seen among 10-14-year-olds (78%). Metformin was by far the most widely used non-insulin antidiabetic drug with a prevalence proportion of 0.51/1000 in 2019, followed by glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues, which, however, showed an eight-fold relative increase during the study period.