Southeast Asian independent cinema: Essays, documents, interviews Edited by TILMAN BAUMGARTEL Singapore: NUS Press, 2012. Pp. 273, Notes, Bibliography, Index. Glimpses of freedom: Independent cinema in Southeast Asia Edited by MAY ADADOL INGAWANIJ and BENJAMIN MCKAY Ithaca, NY: Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications, 2012. Pp. 239, Illustrations, Bibliography. doi: 10.1017/S0022463413000131 Given the heterogeneous geographies and disjunctive histories of Southeast Asia, any attempt at discussing the region's cinema must always err on the side of the plural. In turn, discourses on its independent cinema must attend to contesting notions of independence. Through what forms of relationality can cinema become independent? And independent of what? Such questions are posed by both Southeast Asian independent cinema and Glimpses of freedom: Independent cinema in Southeast Asia, the first two published collections of literature devoted exclusively to the study of the field. The appearance of the two titles within the same year marks a milestone not only for the region's independent cinema, but also its screen culture as a whole, considering that previous discussions of Southeast Asian films were mostly framed within the larger context of Asian cinema. Comparing the two collections to earlier titles such as Being & becoming: The cinemas of Asia (ed. Aruna Vasudev, Latika Padgaonkar and Rashmi Doraiswamy, Macmillan India, 2002) and Contemporary Asian cinema: Popular culture in a global frame (ed. Anne Tereska Ciecko, Berg, 2006) also reveals the shifts in approach, for their chapters are titled not after countries but issues and ideas--a reflection of the post-national paradigm in which Southeast Asian independent cinema operates today. Southeast Asian independent cinema is divided into three sections: 'Essays', 'Documents' and 'Interviews'. The first two essays by John A. Lent and editor Tilman Baumgartel give a broad overview of the region, foregrounding the affinities shared by the independent filmmaking practices of its different countries. Lent's 'Southeast Asian independent cinema: Independent of what?' identifies three forms of independence: of government control, of the studio system and of traditional film aesthetics. While his arguments are mostly cogent, the attempt at designating aesthetic independence as a category in itself is questionable, for it obscures the social realities and economy of means from which 'independent' aesthetics often emerge. Meanwhile, Baumgartel's 'Imagined communities, imagined worlds: Independent film from Southeast Asia in the global mediascape' takes as its key theoretical reference Arjun Appadurai's concept of 'imagined worlds'. Theorised by Appadurai as transnational relational fields through which people, media, technologies, finances and ideas circulate, these 'imagined worlds' are insightfully posited by Baumgartel as 'zones of territorial and cultural disjuncture' (p. 31) in which independent films in the region are made, challenging the Andersonian 'imagined communities' formed through mainstream, state-sanctioned cinema. Another notable essay is Alfian bin Sa'at's 'Hinterland, heartland, home: Affective topography in Singapore films'. Analysing films such as 12 Storeys (1997), Eating Air (1999) and Singapore Dreaming (2006), Alfian puts forth a compelling thesis on how the heartland, referring to the neighbourhoods of high-rise public flats where most Singaporeans live, operates as an imperfect hinterland for a country with none to call its own. Less convincing is the added claim that such images of the Singaporean heartland bear the traces of the kampungs as depicted in Malay films of the sixties, which smacks of romanticism and retroactive rationalisation. Intan Paramaditha's 'Cinema, sexuality and censorship in post-Soeharto Indonesia' also offers keen insights. Through a historical examination of the uneasy relationship between cinema and public morality in Indonesia, Paramaditha illustrates how the shift towards a post-Soeharto institutional environment did not ease censorship laws concerning cinematic depictions of gender and sexuality, but merely transferred the power to oppress from a paternalistic regime to a social climate governed by revived Islamic values. …
Read full abstract