Global Evaluation Of Treatment Effectiveness Research Articles

Effective omalizumab treatment influenced eosinophil function in severe allergic asthmatics.

Omalizumab is an effective anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) treatment for allergic asthma. Eosinophil plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of allergic airway inflammation. This study aimed to explore the influence of effective omalizumab treatment on circulating eosinophils. Allergic asthmatics enrolled in the study were treated with omalizumab for at least 16 weeks and exhibited a good or excellent response according to the global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE) assessed by each patient and specialist physician. For eosinophil functional evaluation, peripheral blood eosinophils were separated; and examined the expression of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR and co-stimulatory molecules cluster of differentiation (CD) 80, CD86 and CD40 by Flow Cytometry and serum were to measure the concentration of eotaxin-1 before and after 16 weeks of omalizumab treatment. Totally 32 allergic asthma patients who responded positively to omalizumab treatment were included. Omalizumab responders showed a significant decline in the expression of co-stimulatory molecules CD40, CD80, and CD86 on peripheral eosinophils and in serum eotaxin-1 concentration after treatment. Negative correlations (r=-0.61, P=0.048) were observed between the change in CD80+ eosinophils and the change in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC)% predicted and maximal expiratory flow (MEF) 25% after omalizumab treatment. Omalizumab improved FEV1/FVC% predicted (3.88, P=0.033), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO, -22.24, P=0.028), asthma control test (ACT, 4.22, P<0.001), mini asthma quality of life questionnaire (mini-AQLQ, -14.44, P=0.019), Leicester cough questionnaire (LCQ, 3.03, P=0.009) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for allergic symptoms (-13.00, P=0.001) in patients with severe allergic asthma statistically; reduced mini rhino-conjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (mini-RQLQ, -8.50, P=0.047), and self-rating anxiety scale (SAS, -5.08, P=0.040) in allergic asthmatics with concomitant allergic rhinitis (AR) or anxiety, respectively. Our findings show a unique role of omalizumab in reducing co-stimulatory molecules expression on eosinophil and serum eotaxin-1 levels in severe allergic asthmatics accompanied by improvement of multiple clinical parameters of allergic diseases.

A real world study of anti-IgE monoclonal antibody in the treatment of allergic united airway disease

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of anti-IgE monoclonal antibody (omazumab) in the treatment of allergic united airway disease (UAD) in the real-wold. Methods: Retrospective cohort study summarizes the case data of patients with allergic united airway disease who were treated with anti IgE monoclonal antibody (omalizumab) for more than 16 weeks from March 1, 2018 to June 30, 2022 in the Peking University First Hospital.The allergic UAD is defined as allergic asthma combined with allergic rhinitis (AA+AR) or allergic asthma combined with chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps (AA+CRSwNP) or allergic asthma combined with allergic rhinitis and nasal polyps (AA+AR+CRSwNP). The control of asthma was evaluated by asthma control test (ACT), lung function test and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). The AR was assessed by total nasal symptom score (TNSS). The CRSwNP was evaluated by nasal visual analogue scale (n-VAS), sino-nasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22), nasal polyps score (TPS) and Lund-Mackay sinus CT grading system. The global evaluation of omalizumab for the treatment of allergic UADwas performed by Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness(GETE).The drug-related side effects were also recorded. Matched t test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare the score changes of IgE monoclonal antibody (omazumab) before and after treatment, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the influencing factors of IgE monoclonal antibody (omazumab) response. Results: A total of 117 patients with UAD were enrolled, ranging in age from 19 to 77 years; The median age of patients was 48.7 years; Among them, 60 were male, ranging from 19 to 77 years old, with a median age of 49.9 years; There were 57 females, ranging from 19 to 68 years old, with a median age of 47.2 years. There were 32 cases in AA+AR subgroup, 59 cases in AA+CRSwNP subgroup, and 26 cases in AA+AR+CRSwNP subgroup. The total serum IgE level was 190.5 (103.8,391.3) IU/ml. The treatment course of anti IgE monoclonal antibody was 24 (16, 32) weeks. Compared with pre-treatment, omalizumab increased ACT from 20.0 (19.5,22.0) to 24.0 (23.0,25.0) (Z=-8.537, P<0.001), increased pre-bronchodilator FEV1 from 90.2 (74.8,103.0)% predicted value to 95.4 (83.2,106.0)% predicted value (Z=-5.315,P<0.001), increased FEV1/FVC from 80.20 (66.83,88.38)% to 82.72 (71.26,92.25)% (Z=-4.483,P<0.001), decreased FeNO from(49.1±24.8) ppb to (32.8±24.4) ppb (t=5.235, P<0.001), decreased TNSS from (6.5±2.6)to (2.4±1.9) (t=14.171, P<0.001), decreased n-VAS from (6.8±1.2) to (3.4±2.0)(t=14.448, P<0.001), decreased SNOT-22 from (40.0±7.9) to (21.3±10.2)(t=15.360, P<0.001), decreased TPS from (4.1±0.8) to (2.4±1.0)(t=14.718, P<0.001) and decreased Lund-Mackay CT score from (6.0±1.3) to (3.1±1.6)(t=17.012, P<0.001). The global response rate to omalizumab was 67.5%(79/117). The response rate in AA+AR (90.6%,29/32) was significantly higher than that in AA+CRSwNP (61.0%,36/59) and AA+AR+CRSwNP (53.8%,14/26) subgroups (χ2=11.144,P=0.004). Only 4 patients (3.4%,4/117) had mild side effects. Conclusion: The real-world study showed favorable effectiveness and safety of anti-IgE monoclonal antibody for treatment of allergic UAD. To provide basis for preventing the progress and precise treatment of allergic UAD.

Specific IgE Response and Omalizumab Responsiveness in Severe Allergic Asthma.

Omalizumab has demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with severe allergic asthma sensitized to perennial allergens and/or severe pollinosis through inhibition of IgE-dependent allergic response. When considering the "one airway, one disease" concept, sensitization to pollen could predict responsiveness to omalizumab. This study aimed to assess whether the pretreatment specific IgE response could be a predictor of responsiveness to omalizumab in severe allergic asthma sensitized to perennial allergens. In this retrospective study, 41 adult patients with severe allergic asthma sensitized to perennial allergens (27 females; mean age 59 years) who had completed 52-week omalizumab treatment were enrolled. The Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness was performed, and demographic characteristics and the positive ratios of specific IgE responses classified into five subgroups (pollen, dust mite, house dust, mold, and animal dander) were compared between responders and non-responders. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of responsiveness to omalizumab. Thirty-one patients (76%) were identified as responders. The number of sensitized aeroallergen subgroups and sensitization to pollens were significantly higher in responders than in non-responders (both p<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that sensitization to pollen (OR = 8.41, p = 0.02) was independently associated with the effectiveness of omalizumab. Pretreatment serum pollen-specific IgE could be a predictor of responsiveness to omalizumab.

Residual Dyspnea May Predict Small Airways Dysfunction and Poor Responsiveness to Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy in Asthmatic Patients.

Recently, single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) has demonstrated efficacy in patients with uncontrolled asthma who were symptomatic despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2 agonists. However, the characteristics of patients who benefit from SITT remain unclear in the real-world. The aim of this study was to examine the predictors of responsiveness to SITT in patients with asthma. A total of 45 patients with asthma who had regularly visited our respiratory clinic and were started on SITT from March 2019 to March 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients' demographic characteristics, residual respiratory symptoms, type 2 biomarkers, and lung function before SITT were assessed from the patients' medical records. Predictors of responsiveness to four-week SITT were evaluated in these patients. The definition of responders was based on the physician-assessed global evaluation of treatment effectiveness. Thirty-four (75%) of 45 patients were identified as responders to SITT. Non-responders showed significantly lower forced vital capacity (FVC) (%predicted) values, and complained of dyspnea more frequently than responders before SITT (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics and type 2 biomarkers between responders and non-responders. Clinical predictors of poor response to SITT were residual dyspnea (OR = 0.14, p = 0.02), low FVC (%predicted) values (OR = 1.05, p = 0.01), and FVC (%predicted) <80% (OR = 0.11, p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis showed that poor response to SITT was associated with residual dyspnea before SITT (OR = 0.14, p = 0.02). On the other hand, patients with residual dyspnea had significantly lower FEF25-75 (%predicted) values than patients without residual dyspnea before SITT (p = 0.04). Residual dyspnea, reflecting small airways dysfunction, may predict poor responsiveness to short-term SITT in patients with asthma.

IMPROVEMENTS IN SELECT PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES ARE SIMILAR ACROSS DIFFERENT OMALIZUMAB DOSING REGIMENS

<h3>Introduction</h3> For patients with asthma, the dose/frequency of omalizumab is determined by bodyweight and pretreatment IgE levels. Since patients who fall outside the dosing table are treated with omalizumab, we assessed patient-reported outcomes (Asthma Control Test [ACT], Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness [GETE], Work Productivity and Activity Impairment [WPAI-Asthma]) stratified by where they fell on the omalizumab dosing table. <h3>Methods</h3> This post hoc analysis examined data from the open-label, 48-week, PROSPERO study (NCT01922037; N=801, ≥12 years with asthma initiated on omalizumab by physician-assessment). For this analysis, subgroups are those who (i) fall within the recommended dosing table (n=506), (ii) fall into the section of the approved dosing table where not enough clinical data was available to make dose recommendations (defined as ‘insufficient data to recommend a dose'; n=72), or (iii) fall outside the dosing table (not in (i) or (ii) and with IgE <30 or >700IU/mL and/or weighing <30 or >150kg; n=209). <h3>Results</h3> Patient characteristics were similar between groups, with the expected exception of total IgE. Improvement in ACT was similar for all groups (mean±SD CFB Month 12: (i) 4.3±5.3, (ii) 5.5±4.9, (iii) 4.5±4.9). At Month 12, GETE was rated by most patients as good/excellent ((i) 76.4% (ii) 82.1% (iii) 75.3%). Improvement in WPAI % activity impairment was similar for all groups (mean±SD CFB Month 12 (i) -20.4±33.0 (ii) -26.1±34.6) (iii) -20.1±30.6). Overall safety in Casale JACI:IP 2019;7(1):156-64. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Select patient-reported outcomes improved regardless of whether patients fell inside or outside the omalizumab dosing table for asthma.

Real-life Effectiveness of Omalizumab in Patients with Severe Allergic Asthma: RELIEF Study.

Patients with severe allergic asthma (SAA) are at risk of severe exacerbations. Omalizumab is recommended as an add-on treatment for patients with uncontrolled SAA, despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long acting β2-agonist combination therapy (standard therapy).RELIEF was a prospective, open label, multicenter study conducted to assess the real-life effectiveness of omalizumab co-administered with standard therapy in patients with SAA for 24 months. A total of 347 patients aged ≥ 6 years with SAA were enrolled, 285 of whom (8 pediatrics and 277 adolescents and adults) completed this 24-month study. Compared with the 12 months prior to baseline, the mean number of exacerbations was reduced in the overall population at any time interval during the study. Proportion of patients with no exacerbations increased to 77.7% at 24 months from 32.6% at 12 months prior to baseline. A reduction in healthcare resource utilization was also observed. The mean number of specialist visits reduced from baseline (5.8 visits) to 2.4 visits at Month 24. The mean asthma control test score was >19 at every time-point during the study. The rate of Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE) for asthma response significantly increased at Months 18 and 24 (P <0.05) compared to baseline. Pulmonary function remained relatively stable for the overall study population. There were no new or unexpected safety findings in the study. RELIEF study showed that add-on therapy with omalizumab is effective in reducing exacerbations, healthcare utilization, and improving GETE score in patients with SAA uncontrolled by standard therapy.

Otitis media in severe asthma associated with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a new therapeutic target for biologics

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNPs) is associated with otitis media with effusion (OME) in about 25% of cases. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy of the 4 biologic agents currently available in France for severe asthma (omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab and dupilumab) in 17 patients followed for both asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and presenting otitis media with effusion (OME) on otoscopy. Methods: It was a multicenter retrospective study performed in 4 academic ENT and respiratory departments in Paris, France, with assessment of the clinical evolution of 17 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and with chronic refractory OME and CRSwNPs treated by biologic agents. Global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE) on asthma, CRSwNP and OME was classified on a 5-point scale as 1, excellent; 2, good; 3, moderate; 4, poor; or 5, symptoms worsening. Response was defined as an excellent/good score (1 or 2). Results: 17 patients were prescribed a total of 30 biologics. The evolution of OME did not follow that of asthma and CRSwNPs in 15 (88%) and 12 (70%) cases, respectively. Concerning OME, 19/30 (63%) patients were non-responders. Among the 10 patients who successively received ≥ 2 biologic agents, the OME response differed, depending on the considered agent Dupilumab had the highest response rate. Conclusions: Resistant OME, associated with asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, can present a disconnected evolution under biologics. CRSwNP-associated OME requires a specific evaluation to define the best treatment.

The "real-world" effectiveness and safety of omalizumab in patients with uncontrolled persistent allergic asthma in Slovakia: a subgroup analysis of the eXpeRience study.

Omalizumab was proven to be effective and safe in patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma. However, there is no direct evidence of the benefits of add-on omalizumab in real-life practice in the Slovakian population. This subgroup analysis assessed the real-life effectiveness and safety of omalizumab in Slovakian patients with severe allergic asthma enrolled in the eXpeRience registry. Patients who commenced omalizumab 15 weeks prior to inclusion were assessed for the physicians' global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE), exacerbation rate, asthma symptoms, lung function, oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, rescue medication, hospitalizations, and school/work absenteeism at 16 weeks and 12 and 24 months. Of 204 patients, 159 (77.9%) completed 2-year follow-up. As per GETE, 69.5% of patients treated with omalizumab achieved excellent/good response at 16 (±1) weeks. The proportion of patients with no severe clinically significant asthma exacerbations increased from 17.3% at pre-treatment to 82.4% and 92.0% at months 12 and 24, respectively. Maintenance OCS use was reduced to 17.0% and 15.3% of patients at 12 and 24 months, respectively, compared with 34.7% at baseline (BL). From BL until month 24, asthma control test scores improved from 11.6 to 20.3; rescue medication use/week decreased from 5.5 to 1.6 days; mean total number of days of asthma-related medical healthcare use decreased from 7.7 to 0.3 days and missed workdays decreased from 16.8 to 0.3 days. No new safety signals were observed. Add-on omalizumab was effective and well-tolerated in Slovakian patients, complementing the results observed in the overall population of eXpeRience.

Are serum immunoglobulin concentrations a predictive biomarker of response to anti-IL5/IL5Rα therapies?

BackgroundApproval of biologics has recently revolutionized T2 severe asthma management. However, predictive biomarkers remain highly needed to improve patient's selection. ObjectiveThis study aims to determine whether serum immunoglobulins (Igs) levels might be predictive biomarkers of response to anti-interleukin-5 (IL5)/IL5Rα therapies. MethodsSevere asthma patients eligible for mepolizumab or benralizumab were included herein. Serum immunoglobulin quantification was performed at baseline before mepolizumab or benralizumab initiation. After a 6-month treatment of mepolizumab or benralizumab, patients presented a second serum immunoglobulin quantification. The treatment response was evaluated by the GETE (Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness) score at 6 months. ResultsA total of 50 patients were included. Median age was 56 [IQR 48.8–65.3] and 50% were females. Compared to baseline, a significant increase in IgG was observed at 6 months (9.2 [7.8–10.2] g/l vs 10.1 [8.8–11.1] g/l, p = 0.04). The area under the ROC curve was 0.58 [95%IC 0.40–0.77] for blood eosinophil count (p = 0.37), 0.75 [95%IC: 0.58–0.92] for serum IgG concentration (p = 0.009) for predicting the treatment response. According to the Youden index, serum IgG concentration ≥ 9.2 g/l predicts the response to anti-IL5 therapies with a sensitivity of 76.9% and a specificity of 75.7%. ConclusionBaseline serum IgG concentrations may be a useful tool to predict the response to anti-IL5/IL5Rα therapies but should be confirmed in larger clinical trials. Interestingly, anti-IL5/IL5Rα therapies are associated with a significant increase in serum IgG concentrations at 6 months.

Differing perceptions of asthma control and treatment effectiveness by patients with severe asthma and treating subspecialists in the United States

Objective For patients with severe asthma (SA), overestimation of asthma control may lead to poorer outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess concurrent patient and specialist assessments of asthma control and treatment effectiveness among a large US cohort of SA patients. Methods CHRONICLE is an ongoing observational study of patients with SA treated by US subspecialists. Asthma control was assessed using the patient-completed Asthma Control Test™ (ACT™) and specialist clinical assessment of control. Treatment effectiveness was measured using the Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE) completed by patients and specialists. Results 1109 patients who completed online surveys at enrollment were included. 14%, 28%, 25%, and 33% of patients had ACT™ scores of 5–9, 10–15, 16–19, and 20–25, respectively. Compared with 67% of patients with uncontrolled asthma by ACT™, 44% were uncontrolled by specialist assessment. 54% of patients who were uncontrolled according to the ACT™ were rated as controlled by specialists, demonstrating overestimation of asthma control. Based on ACT™ score, asthma control was more frequent among patients treated with biologics compared to other treatments. Using the GETE, 90% of patients reported treatment effectiveness compared with 71% of specialists. Patient and specialist treatment effectiveness categorizations agreed 73% of the time. Conclusion Specialists commonly overestimated asthma control relative to ACT™ scores. Patients reported treatment effectiveness more frequently than specialists. These findings emphasize the importance of validated instruments to assess asthma control and reduce potential treatment gaps associated with patient-specialist discordance. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03373045.

Omalizumab Effectiveness in Severe Allergic Asthma with Multiple Allergic Comorbidities: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the STELLAIR Study.

BackgroundImmunoglobulin (Ig) E-mediated pathophysiological mechanisms are common in allergic diseases including severe allergic asthma (SAA). The anti-IgE monoclonal antibody omalizumab may be particularly beneficial for patients with SAA and multiple allergic comorbidities (AC) including perennial/seasonal rhinitis, conjunctivitis, atopic dermatitis (AD), and food allergy.MethodsWe conducted a post-hoc analysis of the patients from the STELLAIR study (n=872, 149 minors and 723 adults). The patients were classified based on the presence of multiple AC (≥3 AC or <3 AC) or AD as assessed by questionnaire. Response to omalizumab was assessed after 4–6 months (T4–6) and after 12 months (T12). Asthma response at T4–6 was based on global evaluation of treatment effectiveness, reduction of ≥40% in annual exacerbation rate, and a combination of both. Asthma response at T12 was based on change in yearly exacerbation and hospitalization rates. AC improvement at T12 was based on patient perception.ResultsPatients with ≥3 AC demonstrated a higher combined response to omalizumab (74.7% vs 58.3%) at T4–6 and had reduced yearly exacerbation and hospitalization rates (88.9% vs 77.4% and −94.0% vs −70.5%, respectively). Patients with ≥3 AC were more likely to show an improvement in their AC (85.3% vs 51.9%) at T12. Results were similar in minors and adults. The presence of AD was associated with greater omalizumab effectiveness at T4–6 and a greater AC improvement at T12. Improvement of AD and food allergies at T12 were 73.2% and 38.7%, respectively, in the population overall.ConclusionThis post-hoc analysis of the STELLAIR study shows that omalizumab is beneficial for all SAA patients and especially for patients with multiple AC or AD. In patients with ≥3 AC, omalizumab also improved AC outcomes.

Blood eosinophil count and FeNO to predict benralizumab effectiveness in real-life severe asthma patients

Objective Benralizumab is a promising drug for severe uncontrolled asthma. This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness of benralizumab in a real-life setting. Methods Subjects included 24 patients with severe type 2 asthma who received benralizumab between April 2018 and July 2019. Changes in parameters, exacerbation frequency, and oral corticosteroid (OCS) use after 4 and 24 weeks of administration were examined. The parameters included the Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE) scale, Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Control Test (ACT), blood eosinophils, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), and spirometry. The response to treatment was defined as follows: for patients with exacerbations or OCS use before treatment initiation, a reduction of ≥50% in exacerbation frequency or OCS use; and for patients without exacerbations or OCS use, an improvement of ≥0.5 in ACQ scores and ≥3 in ACT scores, or of ≥10.38% in FEV1. Results Twenty-one patients completed the treatment for 24 weeks. Excellent and good GETE scales and ACQ and ACT improvement were found in 67% of the patients at 4 weeks, and the effect continued until 24 weeks. The patients’ rate with exacerbations was significantly reduced compared to the previous 24 weeks before administration. In 17 patients receiving OCS, the use could be reduced or quit in 14 patients. Overall, 16 patients (76.2%) met the responder definition and could be predicted by the baseline eosinophil count and FeNO levels with the best cutoff values of 100/μL and 40 ppb, respectively. Conclusions Blood eosinophil and FeNO could predict benralizumab effectiveness.

Omalizumab Restores Response to Corticosteroids in Patients with Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Severe Asthma.

Eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS), which is a subgroup of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, is characterized by eosinophilic airway inflammation extending across both the upper and lower airways. Some severe cases are refractory even after endoscopic sinus surgery, likely because of local steroid insensitivity. Although real-life studies indicate that treatment with omalizumab for severe allergic asthma improves the outcome of coexistent ECRS, the underlying mechanisms of omalizumab in eosinophilic airway inflammation have not been fully elucidated. Twenty-five patients with ECRS and severe asthma who were refractory to conventional treatments and who received omalizumab were evaluated. Nineteen of twenty-five patients were responsive to omalizumab according to physician-assessed global evaluation of treatment effectiveness. In the responders, the levels of peripheral blood eosinophils and fractionated exhaled nitric oxide (a marker of eosinophilic inflammation) and of CCL4 and soluble CD69 (markers of eosinophil activation) were reduced concomitantly with the restoration of corticosteroid sensitivity. Omalizumab restored the eosinophil-peroxidase-mediated PP2A inactivation and steroid insensitivity in BEAS-2B. In addition, the local inflammation simulant model using BEAS-2B cells incubated with diluted serum from each patient confirmed omalizumab’s effects on restoration of corticosteroid sensitivity via PP2A activation; thus, omalizumab could be a promising therapeutic option for refractory eosinophilic airway inflammation with corticosteroid resistance.

Effect of omalizumab as add-on therapy to Quality of Life Questionnaire for Korean Asthmatics (KAQLQ) in Korean patients with severe persistent allergic asthma.

Background/AimsOmalizumab is the first biologic known to be effective in patients with severe allergic asthma.MethodsThis study was conducted as a multicenter, single-group, open trial to evaluate the improvement in the quality of life with the additional administration of omalizumab for 24 weeks in Korean patients with severe persistent allergic asthma.ResultsOf the 44 patients, 31.8% were men and the mean age was 49.8 ± 11.8 years. A score improvement of 0.5 points or more in the Quality of Life Questionnaire for Korean Asthmatics (KAQLQ) was noted in 50.0% (22/44) of the patinets. In the improved group, the baseline total immunoglobulin E (IgE) level and the amount of omalizumab used were higher, and the day and night asthma symptoms were more severe, compared to those in the non-improved group. According to the Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness, favorable outcomes were found in 78.6% of patients. The Korean asthma control test (p < 0.005) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second % predicted (FEV1%; p < 0.01) improved significantly in patients who received omalizumab treatment, compared to that at week 0, and the total dose of rescue systemic corticosteroids significantly decreased (p < 0.05). The improved group on KAQLQ showed a significant improvement in FEV1% (p < 0.001).ConclusionsOmalizumab can be considered a biological treatment for Korean patients with severe allergic asthma. It is recommended to consider omalizumab as add-on therapy in patients with high baseline total IgE levels and severe asthma symptoms.

Real-world Safety and Efficacy of Indacaterol Maleate in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Evidence from the Long-term Post-marketing Surveillance in Japan.

Objective Evidence concerning the safety and efficacy of indacaterol maleate in a real-life setting is limited. The objective of this post-marketing surveillance was to evaluate the real-life safety and efficacy of indacaterol maleate in Japanese patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods This was a 52-week post-marketing surveillance conducted between April 2012 and December 2018. The safety endpoints included the incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The efficacy endpoints included the physician-reported global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE), change from baseline in the COPD assessment test (CAT) results, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and %FEV1 following 4, 12, 26, and 52 weeks of indacaterol administration. Results Of the 1,846 enrolled patients, 1,726 were included in the safety and efficacy analyses. The mean age of the patients was 72.5 years old. Cough, pneumonia and COPD worsening were the most common AEs reported, while pneumonia (1.04%) was the most common SAE, and cough (1.68%) was the most common ADR. GETE showed that 69.70% of patients achieved an excellent/good/moderate response following indacaterol treatment. The CAT score decreased, and lung function parameters (FVC, FEV1 and %FEV1) improved across all the COPD stages following treatment with indacaterol. Conclusion Indacaterol showed a favorable safety and tolerability profile in Japanese patients with COPD without new safety signals observed in real-life settings. These findings demonstrated that indacaterol is an effective maintenance treatment in real-life practice for Japanese patients with COPD.

Real-life long-term safety and effectiveness of omalizumab in Japanese pediatric patients with severe allergic asthma: A post-marketing surveillance

BackgroundOmalizumab is approved as add-on therapy for pediatric asthma since 2013 in Japan, however, its data in clinical practice is limited. This post-marketing surveillance aimed to evaluate long-term safety and effectiveness of omalizumab in Japanese pediatric patients with severe allergic asthma in real-life setting. MethodsThis 104-week, multicenter surveillance was conducted from September 2013 to May 2019 by central registration method. Patients with severe allergic asthma aged ≥6 and < 15 years at initiation of treatment who were first-time omalizumab users were included. The primary endpoints included incidence of adverse drug reactions and physician's Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE). The secondary endpoints included incidence of serious adverse events, adverse events and adverse drug reactions of special interest and asthma exacerbation-related events. ResultsOf the 128 patients enrolled, 127 completed the surveillance and were included for safety and effectiveness analysis. Thirteen patients experienced 20 adverse drug reactions with an incidence rate of 10.2%. The most frequent adverse drug reactions were pyrexia (2.4%) and urticaria (1.6%). In total, adverse events and serious adverse events occurred in 60 (47.2%) and 30 patients (23.6%) respectively. Two patients experienced anaphylactic reaction and 1 patient experienced type 1 hypersensitivity. 77.2% had an effective response to omalizumab according to GETE at final assessment, and frequency of all asthma exacerbation-related events decreased in post-treatment versus pre-treatment. ConclusionsLong-term omalizumab treatment showed no new safety signals in pediatric patients with severe allergic asthma. The observed safety and effectiveness profile was consistent with previous studies.

Real-World Effectiveness of Omalizumab in Severe Allergic Asthma: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Assessment of clinical outcomes in the real-world corroborates findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This meta-analysis evaluated real-world data of omalizumab on treatment response, lung function, exacerbations, oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), health care resource utilization (HCRU), and school/work absenteeism at 4, 6, and 12 months after treatment. Observational studies in patients with severe allergic asthma (≥6 years) treated with omalizumab for ≥16 weeks, published from January 2005 to October 2018, were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. A random-effects model was used to assess heterogeneity. In total, 86 publications were included. Global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE) was good/excellent in 77% patients at 16 weeks (risk difference: 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.84; I2= 96%) and in 82% patients at 12 months (0.82, 0.73-0.91; 97%). The mean improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 160, 220, and 250 mL at 16 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months, respectively. There was a decrease in Asthma Control Questionnaire score at 16 weeks (-1.14), 6 months (-1.56), and 12 months (-1.13) after omalizumab therapy. Omalizumab significantly reduced annualized rate of severe exacerbations (risk ratio [RR]: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.30-0.56; I2= 96%), proportion of patients receiving OCS (RR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.47-0.75; I2= 96%), and number of unscheduled physician visits (mean difference:-2.34, 95% CI:-3.54 to-1.13; I2= 98%) at 12 months versus baseline. The consistent improvements in GETE, lung function, and PROs, and reductions in asthma exacerbations, OCS use, and HCRU with add-on omalizumab in real-life confirm and complement the efficacy data of RCTs.

Effectiveness of omalizumab in children and adolescents with uncontrolled allergic asthma: a case series from Poland.

IntroductionOmalizumab has been successfully used as a supplementary therapy to improve asthma control in children aged ≥ 6 years with moderate or severe persistent allergic asthma.AimTo evaluate effectiveness ofomalizumab in children and adolescents with uncontrolled allergic asthma.Material and methodsSeventeen children and adolescents aged 8–16, treated with omalizumab from 2011 until now, were enrolled into the retrospective, open, uncontrolled, observational study. The effectiveness of therapy, asthma control, quality of life, exacerbation rate, corticosteroid use, were assessed after 16, 52 and 104 weeks of treatment and after omalizumab cessation.ResultsThe response to treatment was assessed as excellent (9 patients) and good (6 patients), according to global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE). A statistically significant decrease in use of oral corticosteroids (OCS) and leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) was observed. The doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) decreased significantly (the mean dose of ICS converted to a dose of budesonide before treatment was 1503.53 μg/day versus 903.53 μg after discontinuation). The mean asthma control questionnaire (ACQ) value decreased from 2.10 to 0.84 points and the mean mini asthma quality of life questionnaire (miniAQLQ) outcome increased from 4.37 to 6.1 points. The mean number of exacerbations decreased from 5.59 to 0.53 per year.ConclusionsOur results are supportive of the existing evidence that omalizumab therapy improves asthma control, reduces OCS and ICS use, decreases exacerbations in children and adolescents with severe/moderate uncontrolled allergic asthma.

Comparative Study cf Biosimilar Genolar® Clinical Efficacy оп the Randomized Phase III Study Results

There are results of a comparative phase III clinical study on the efficiency and safety of the biosimilar drug Genolar® (Generium JSC, Russia) and the reference drug Xolair® (Novartis Pharma AG, Switzerland) ((NCT04607629). The study is aimed to establish the clinical equivalence of the compared drugs for additional therapy of patients with moderate and severe bronchial asthma (BA) are considered in the article. Methods. The study enrolled 191 patients aged 18 to 75 years with a moderate to severe atopic asthma for ≥ 1 year, the symptoms of which were insufficiently controlled by therapy corresponding to the 4 th stage of treatment (GINA, 2017) for ≥ 2 months before the screening. Patients were divided into the two groups in a ratio of 2 : 1 with the block randomization. 127 patients of the Group 1 were administered Genolar® for 52 weeks ± 3 days; 64 patients of the Group 2 were administered Xolair® for 26 weeks ± 3 days. The dose and frequency of the compared drugs administration were determined based both the initial IgE concentration (IU/mL) measured before treatment and the current body weight (kg) of the patient. The recommended omal-izumab dose was 75 to 600 mg once every 2 or 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the patients’ percentage with a physician evaluation of “excellent” or “good” on the Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE) scale after 26 weeks of comparative treatment. Results. According to the data analysis results, the patients’ proportion with a GETE score of “excellent” or “good” after 26 weeks of therapy were no statistically significant differences between the groups in both investigated populations (PP-population (per protocol) and FAS-population (full analyses set)) (p &gt; 0.05). Primary efficacy endpoint data analysis showed that the patients’ proportion of the PP population with a GETE score of “excellent” or “good” was 57.4% of the Group 1 and 45.2% of the Group 2 (p = 0.132). The calculated one-sided 95% CI in order to test the study statistical hypothesis showed that the investigated drug Genolar® (Generium JSC, Russia) is “non-inferior” than the reference drug. The PP population onesided 95% CI was from -0.5 to 25.0% (p = 0.116), the FAS population one was from -1.1 to 24.2% (p = 0.134). According to the safety analysis results, the comparability of the investigated and reference drugs in terms of the frequency of the adverse events was demonstrated. The analysis results of the anti-drug antibodies to omalizumab detection revealed the antibody production absence in response to the administration of the studied drugs. Conclusion. The clinical study results have proved the equivalence of the biological analogue Genolar® (Generium JSC, Russia) and the reference drug Xolair® (Novartis Pharma AG, Switzerland).

Efficacy predictors of omalizumab in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma: Findings from a post-hoc analysis of a randomised phase III study

BackgroundOmalizumab has demonstrated efficacy as an add-on therapy in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma. This post-hoc analysis assessed the potential predictors for the efficacy of omalizumab in these patients. MethodsA post-hoc analysis was performed on a Phase III, randomised, controlled study conducted in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe persistent allergic asthma (NCT01202903). We evaluated if levels of pre-treatment serum total immunoglobulin-E (IgE) and blood eosinophil (EOS), asthma severity, allergen profile, history of perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR), and free IgE level during omalizumab treatment were predictive of omalizumab's efficacy. ResultsThis analysis included 608 patients (omalizumab, N = 306; placebo, N = 302). Improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), standardized Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), and Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE) scores with omalizumab treatment compared with placebo were observed in patients with baseline IgE levels ≥76 IU/mL (irrespective of the EOS count). Relatively greater improvements with omalizumab treatment was also noted in patients with both moderate or severe allergic asthma (regardless of asthma severity), and patients sensitised to >3 allergens and with a history of PAR. All patients who were treated with omalizumab achieved free IgE levels below 50 ng/mL by Week 1. Similar clinical outcomes were observed in the subset of patients who achieved free IgE levels of <25 and ≥ 25 ng/mL. ConclusionsIn Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma, baseline IgE and allergen profile (number/PAR history) are potential predictors of treatment response to omalizumab. Trial registrationNCT01202903 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).