Global Assessment Score Research Articles

Fixed-Combination Halobetasol Propionate 0.01% and Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion and Halobetasol Propionate 0.01% Lotion for Plaque Psoriasis on Areas With Body Hair: Maintenance of Treatment Effect

Background: Psoriasis on hair-bearing body areas may be difficult to treat with topical therapy, as hair may reduce penetration of active ingredients.1 Patients may also experience disease rebound following cessation of corticosteroid therapy.2,3 An appropriate vehicle for hair-bearing areas may increase penetration, and a combination of corticosteroid and tazarotene may improve maintenance of treatment effect following cessation.4-6 Fixed-combination halobetasol propionate (0.01%) and tazarotene (0.045%) lotion (HP/TAZ) and HP 0.01% lotion are indicated for treatment of plaque psoriasis in adults7,8 and contain a vehicle optimized for penetration.6,9 Previously, a post hoc analysis demonstrated the efficacy and safety of HP/TAZ and HP in treating men with plaque psoriasis on the leg, a representative area with body hair.10 Here, we expand on the previous study by reporting maintenance of efficacy following treatment cessation in this population. Methods: In phase 3 trials, participants with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were randomized to treatment or vehicle once daily for 8 weeks (HP/TAZ, n=276; vehicle, n=142; HP, n=285; vehicle, n=145). Participants were assessed at 2-week intervals and at 4 weeks after treatment cessation (week 12).11,12 In this post hoc analysis, treatment success (≥2-grade improvement in investigator’s global assessment score and score of clear or almost clear); erythema, plaque elevation, and scaling success (≥2-grade improvement for each); and safety were assessed in men with psoriasis on the leg treated with HP/TAZ (n=87) or HP (n=91). Maintenance of effect was defined as the proportion of participants who achieved treatment, erythema, plaque elevation, or scaling success at week 8 and maintained success at week 12. Men were assumed to have leg hair. Treatment comparisons were indirect. Results: Four weeks after treatment cessation, HP/TAZ–treated participants exhibited increased rates of treatment success (week 8, 35.3%; week 12, 37.2%) and erythema success (week 8, 37.4%; week 12, 48.4%), whereas HP-treated participants exhibited decreased rates (treatment success: week 8, 35.5%; week 12, 23.1%; erythema success: week 8, 50.6%; week 12, 36.5%). HP/TAZ–treated participants exhibited less attrition in plaque elevation and scaling success after treatment cessation (week 8, 57.4% and 56.3%; week 12, 55.1% and 55.8%, respectively) versus HP-treated participants (week 8, 53.1% and 61.7%; week 12, 39.8% and 41.6%, respectively). For all outcomes, a greater proportion of participants receiving HP/TAZ achieved maintenance of effect from weeks 8 to 12 compared with participants receiving HP (range: HP/TAZ, 74%-85%; HP, 56%-62%). No new safety signals were identified. Conclusions: Following treatment cessation of HP/TAZ, men with plaque psoriasis on the leg experienced further disease improvement and maintained treatment effects at greater rates than those treated with HP, suggesting that tazarotene combined with HP provides prolonged efficacy in hair-bearing areas.

Dupilumab Demonstrates a Higher Likelihood of Achieving Improvements in Signs, Symptoms, and Quality of Life vs. Tralokinumab at Week 16: Results from a Bucher Indirect Treatment Comparison

Background: Dupilumab and tralokinumab are biologics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), aged ≥6 months and ≥12 years, respectively. Dupilumab and tralokinumab have demonstrated efficacy and safety in clinical trials. However, no direct head-to-head trials have been performed to compare the efficacy of dupilumab vs tralokinumab. The Bucher indirect treatment comparison (ITC) is a robust, placebo-adjusted, and accepted method to evaluate the relative efficacy of drugs in the absence of direct comparisons. The objective of this analysis was to report results from a Bucher ITC comparing the efficacy of dupilumab+topical corticosteroid (TCS) vs tralokinumab+TCS at Week 16. Methods: The placebo-adjusted Bucher ITC included published data from the two similarly designed phase 3 trials, LIBERTY AD CHRONOS (NCT02260986) and ECZTRA 3 (NCT03363854). For both studies, data from the 16-week period were used, employing non-responder imputation, with the following doses: 300mg dupilumab every 2 weeks (q2w)+TCS or placebo+TCS, and 300mg tralokinumab q2w+TCS or placebo+TCS. The evaluated endpoints included the proportions of patients achieving an Investigator’s Global Assessment score 0/1 (IGA 0/1; clear/almost clear), 75% and 90% improvements from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75 and EASI-90), ≥4-point improvement from baseline in the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale score (PP-NRS >4), and ≥4-point improvement from baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI >4). The Bucher ITC with the frequentist approach was performed using R software (v 4.20; netmeta package) with a fixed-effect model. Results were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: A total of 801 patients (LIBERTY AD CHRONOS: placebo+TCS: 315; dupilumab+TCS: 106; ECZTRA 3: placebo+TCS: 127; tralokinumab+TCS: 253) were included in the Bucher ITC. Baseline disease characteristics indicated comparable severity between the two trial populations based on IGA and PP-NRS. However, CHRONOS showed slightly higher baseline EASI scores (median [Q1, Q3] score 30.9 [22.3, 41.6] vs. ECZTRA 3: 24.7 [18.4, 35.9]), while ECZTRA 3 showed slightly higher DLQI scores (median [Q1, Q3] score 18.0 [12.0, 23.0] vs. CHRONOS: 13.5 [8.0, 20.0]). Patients treated with dupilumab+TCS had a significantly higher likelihood of achieving IGA 0/1 (OR=2.49, 95%CI 1.24–5.00), EASI-75 (OR=3.21, 95%CI 1.66–6.19), EASI-90 (OR=2.92, 95%CI 1.41–6.02), PP-NRS ≥4 (OR=3.62, 95%CI 1.87–7.00), and DLQI ≥4 (OR=2.16, 95%CI 1.03–4.54) at Week 16 vs those treated with tralokinumab+TCS. Conclusions: A placebo-adjusted Bucher ITC showed that the likelihood of achieving improvements in signs, symptom, and quality of life is significantly higher for patients treated with dupilumab+TCS vs tralokinumab+TCS at Week 16.

The Efficacy of Topical Cosmetic Containing Alpha‐Arbutin 5% and Kojic Acid 2% Compared With Triple Combination Cream for the Treatment of Melasma: A Split‐Face, Evaluator‐Blinded Randomized Pilot Study

ABSTRACTBackgroundWhile the gold standard treatment for melasma is triple combination cream (TCC), arbutin and kojic acid demonstrate their benefits and may be used as an alternative.AimsTo investigate the efficacy of cream containing alpha‐arbutin 5% and kojic acid 2% (AAK) compared with TCC for melasma treatment.Patients/MethodsA split‐faced, randomized study was conducted among 30 participants with melasma, and all were randomized to receive AAK or TCC on each side of their face for 12‐week along with 4‐week follow‐up period. The melanin index (MI), modified Melasma Area Severity Index (mMASI), and physician global assessment (PGA) scores were used to measure the effectiveness of interventions. Recurrence of melasma after treatment discontinuation was evaluated by MI and mMASI. Patient satisfactions and adverse effects were also evaluated. In the analysis, the mean difference (MD) was used for MI and mMASI, while Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was for the PGA scores, adverse effects, and patient satisfaction.ResultsThe MD of MI and mMASI scores were not different between groups (mMASI [p = 0.344] and MI [p = 0.268]). The PGA scores only showed improvement on the TCC‐treated side (p = 0.032). Compared to the AKK group, the subjects with TCC showed higher severity of recurrence (MI [p = 0.004] and mMASI [p = 0.045]). No difference in patient satisfaction score between the groups, but erythema and stinging were higher in the TCC group.ConclusionsThe AAK cream appeared to be effective for melasma treatment, highlighting a lower recurrent rate and fewer adverse events than standard therapy.Trial Registration: thaiclinicaltrials.org: TCTR20230124004

Persistent Inadequate Disease Control and Therapeutic Inertia in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A 12-month Longitudinal Analysis of Real-world Outcomes from the TARGET-DERM AD registry

Background: Therapeutic inertia refers to the delay or failure in treatment escalation in patients not achieving adequate disease control; it is a challenge in the management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Despite the availability of conventional (CST) and advanced systemic therapies (AST) utilized for the treatment of moderate to severe AD, many patients do not achieve treatment success. However, the extent of this inadequacy in real-world clinical practice remains underexplored. Objectives: This study evaluates the occurrence of therapeutic inertia and the proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe AD who continue to show inadequate response after receiving systemic therapies for a duration from 3 to 12 months Methods: We conducted a longitudinal analysis of patients with moderate-to-severe AD (vIGA-AD≥3) from the TARGET-DERM AD registry, including 3,457 participants from 39 centers in the U.S. and Canada. Eligible patients had documented outcomes at the initiation of systemic therapy and after 3 months up to 12 months of follow up. We assessed clinician- and patient-reported outcomes to identify the proportion of patients not meeting treatment targets based on expert consensus. An inadequate response was defined as not achieving a validated Investigator Global Assessment (vIGA-AD) score ≤2, a 50% improvement in Body Surface Area (BSA), and a ≥4-point reduction in the Worst Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (WP-NRS). An optimal response was defined as a vIGA-AD score ≤1 (clear or almost clear skin), BSA ≤2%, and WP-NRS itch score of 0/1 (complete or almost complete skin resolution). Results: Out of 2,107 patients with moderate-to-severe AD, 445 met the inclusion criteria. The majority were adults (63.8%), female (62.0%), and Non-Hispanic White (45.4%), with an average age of 31 years. Most patients (88.8%) initiated treatment with AST, with dupilumab being the most common (86.5%). The mean vIGA-AD was 3.3 for AST and 3.6 for CST at initiation (P<0.01). At 6 months, 37% and 67% of AST-treated patients had inadequate responses in terms of skin clearance and itch outcomes, respectively, while 82% and 79% did not achieve optimal responses. At 12 months, these figures were approximately 30% and 66% for inadequate responses and 85% and 88% for not achieving optimal responses, respectively. CST-treated patients showed a similar trend. Conclusions: The study reveals that a significant portion of moderate-to-severe AD patients fail to achieve adequate disease control with systemic therapies over 12 months, indicating substantial presence of therapeutic inertia. These findings suggest a need for more proactive management strategies in AD treatment.

Impact of Therapeutic Inertia on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A 12-Month Longitudinal Study from the TARGET-DERM AD Registry

Background: Therapeutic inertia, the delay or reluctance to modify treatment when goals are unmet, is a significant challenge in managing chronic diseases, including atopic dermatitis (AD). This inertia can lead to suboptimal disease control and affect patient outcomes. Objectives: This study evaluates the effect of therapeutic inertia on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in moderate-to-severe AD patients undergoing systemic treatment over 3 to 12 months. Methods: We analyzed longitudinal data from the TARGET-DERM AD registry, which includes 3,457 patients with moderate-to-severe AD from 39 centers across the U.S. and Canada. Eligible patients had documented patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at the initiation of systemic therapy and at subsequent 3-month intervals up to 12 months of follow-up. We assessed the proportion of patients not meeting treatment targets based on expert consensus. Patients had a validated Investigator Global Assessment (vIGA-AD) score of 3 or more at initiation of either an advanced systemic therapy (AST) such as biologics or JAK inhibitors or a conventional systemic therapy (CST) such as cyclosporine, methotrexate, or prednisone. PROs were evaluated at 3-month intervals up to 12 months, assessing achievement against the predefined treatment targets. PRO measures included Worst-Itch (PROMIS Itch-Severity), POEM, PO-SCORAD, NRS-sleep, and NRS-pain with specific moderate and optimal target levels established for each. Itch-Severity (range: 0–10; moderate target: ≥4-point reduction, optimal target: score ≤1), POEM (range: 0-28; moderate target: ≥4-point reduction, optimal target: score ≤2), PO-SCORAD (range: 0-103; moderate target: score ≤24; optimal target: score ≤10), NRS-sleep and NRS-pain (range: 0-10; moderate target: reduction ≥3-points; optimal target: score ≤1). Results: Out of 2107 patients with moderate-to-severe AD, 445 qualifying participants were included (63.8% adult, 62.0% female, 45.4% Non-Hispanic White, mean age of 31 years). Most patients (88.8%) initiated AST, with dupilumab being the most common (86.5%). At 6 months, significant proportions of AST-treated patients failed to reach moderate and optimal targets for itch (67% and 79%, respectively), POEM (46% and 69%), and NRS-sleep (59% and 47%). By 12 months, these figures were similar, with 66% and 88% failing to meet itch targets, 53% and 73% failing to meet POEM targets, and 62% and 45% failing to meet NRS-sleep targets, respectively. A similar pattern was observed for other PROs. CST-treated patients exhibited similar trends. Conclusions: The study highlights the profound impact of therapeutic inertia on the quality of life of patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Despite systemic therapy, a considerable proportion failed to meet treatment targets over a 12-month period, underscoring the need for more proactive and responsive treatment strategies in AD management.

Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib Cream by Anatomic Region in Children Aged 2 to 11 Years With Atopic Dermatitis: Results From TRuE-AD3

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, pruritic inflammatory skin disease. Ruxolitinib (Janus kinase [JAK]1/JAK2 inhibitor) cream has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients aged ≥2 years with AD. In adolescents (aged ≥12 y) and adults with AD, application of ruxolitinib cream resulted in significant improvements across all anatomic regions vs vehicle. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib cream by anatomic region in the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 TRuE-AD3 study (NCT04921969). Children aged 2–11 years with AD for ≥3 months and an Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 2/3 were randomized 2:2:1 to apply 0.75% or 1.5% ruxolitinib cream twice daily (BID) or vehicle BID for 8 weeks. Efficacy was evaluated using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) subscores for head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Of 330 patients in TRuE-AD3, the mean (SD) age was 6.5 (2.9) years, and 179 patients (54.2%) were female; the mean (SD) EASI score was 8.6 (5.4). Improvements in EASI score were demonstrated with 0.75% and 1.5% ruxolitinib cream vs vehicle at first observation (Week 2), with statistically significant differences (at 0.05 alpha level and all P values below are nominal) at Week 8 in the head and neck (−0.63 [P=0.0108] and −0.70 [P=0.0011] vs −0.41), trunk (−0.98 [P=0.0310] and −1.18 [P=0.0003] vs −0.70), upper limbs (−1.81 [P<0.0001] and −2.06 [P<0.0001] vs −1.18), and lower limbs (−2.91 [P<0.0001] and −3.23 [P<0.0001] vs −1.43). Improvements in induration/papulation/edema, erythema, excoriation, and lichenification were observed for both strengths of ruxolitinib cream vs vehicle in all regions at Week 2, with statistical significance (at 0.05 alpha level) in nearly all AD signs and regions at Week 8. Ruxolitinib cream was well tolerated in both treatment groups (n=264), with 4.5% of patients experiencing application site reactions, which was similar to the frequency of application site reactions (4.3%) among patients with head/neck involvement (n=161) . In conclusion, ruxolitinib cream demonstrated significant improvements in AD vs vehicle in children with AD across anatomic regions, including on the head/neck, and was well tolerated. (Funding, Incyte Corporation)

Skin health promoting effects of a proprietary nutraceutical ingredient (SesZen-BioTM): a placebo controlled, double-blind, and randomized clinical study

Background: This study evaluated the skin health benefits of SesZen-BioTM, a 0.5% natural biotin supplement derived from Sesbania grandiflora, previously linked to hair growth, in healthy adults aged 30-55 with mild skin ageing. Methods: In a single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, participants between ages 30-55 years with mild skin ageing received either SesZen-BioTM or a placebo, with assessments conducted on days 0, 28, and 56. Parameters measured included facial wrinkles, fine lines, skin elasticity, hydration, skin barrier function and overall skin health. Results: Significant reduction (p<0.01) in crow’s feet area by 27.11% (day 28) and 48.14% (day 56) and 17.95% and 51.17% reduction in fines lines were observed in the treatment group as compared to 12.1% reduction for placebo group at day 56. Physician global assessment (PGA) scores showed improvement in skin condition by 14.07% (day 28) and 20.58% (day 56) for SesZen-BioTM treatment group. The facial skin tone assessment described by individual typology angle (ITA) showed lighter skin tone by 30.55% (day 28) and 58.23% (day 56) (p<0.01). Treatment group showed decrease in retraction time for skin elasticity on day 56, decreased skin roughness and increased skin hydration. Both groups showed decreased transepidermal water loss (TEWL) on both visits (days 28 and 56) as compared to baselines (p<0.01). The placebo group showed no improvement in PGA score, skin tone lightness (L*) and ITA score, skin hydration, or skin elasticity. Conclusions: SesZen-BioTM appears to effectively promote skin health, reducing fine lines and improving skin tone, elasticity, and hydration, suggesting a viable strategy for combating skin aging and enhancing overall skin appearance.

Real-world safety and effectiveness of adalimumab in patients with pyoderma gangrenosum: Interim analysis of a post-marketing observational study in Japan.

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rapidly progressive disease characterized by deep ulcers, predominantly in the lower extremities. Adalimumab, a monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor alpha, is the first drug approved for PG treatment in Japan, ahead of other countries. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, post-marketing observational study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of adalimumab in Japanese patients with PG. Of 67 patients enrolled, 37 in the safety analysis set and 32 in the effectiveness analysis set were included in this interim analysis. (Nineteen patients whose case report forms were not collected and 11 whose data were not fixed by the data cut-off date were excluded from the study). In the safety analysis set, the mean age was 62.9 years and 86.5% of patients had comorbidities, including ulcerative colitis (21.6%), diabetes mellitus (18.9%), and hypertension (10.8%); subtypes of PG included ulcerative (n = 33), vegetative (n = 2), and pustular (n = 2). Mean exposure duration to adalimumab was 185.5 days. Systemic steroids were used before (70.3%) and during (56.8%) adalimumab treatment. The incidence proportion of overall adverse drug reactions was 18.9%. The incidence proportions of all infections and serious infections reported as adverse drug reactions were 13.5% and 10.8%, respectively. The proportion of patients with a Physician Global Assessment score (total lesions) of 0/1 at weeks 12, 26, and 52 was 42.9%, 36.8%, and 50.0%, respectively. This interim analysis revealed the characteristics of Japanese patients with PG treated with adalimumab in the actual clinical setting and the real-world safety and effectiveness of adalimumab. At the time of the interim analysis, adalimumab treatment was generally well tolerated, and no new safety concerns were detected. Further follow-up of this study will provide a more detailed understanding of the long-term safety and effectiveness of adalimumab in patients with PG refractory to conventional treatments.

Trends and Factors Related to Quality of Life in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) score is strongly correlated with HRQoL in IBD patients. This study aimed to assess the factors influencing HRQoL in IBD patients. In this prospective study, all patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) completed the SIBDQ at enrollment; some patients also completed a second SIBDQ at follow-up. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine associations between SIBDQ scores and clinical factors. A total of 1,020 patients participated (UC, 67%; CD, 33%). The median SIBDQ score was 52 (interquartile range, 44 to 59). In UC patients, the stool frequency (β=-2.333, p<0.001), Physician Global Assessment score (β=-3.950, p<0.001), fecal calprotectin level (β=-4.014, p<0.001), and corticosteroid use (β=-4.809, p=0.006) were negatively correlated with the SIBDQ score. In CD patients, the number of diarrhea episodes per day (β=-1.467, p=0.024) and Crohn's Disease Activity Index score (β=-0.045, p<0.001) were negatively correlated with the SIBDQ score. A total of 202 patients completed the second SIBDQ within a mean of 3.4 years. The distributions of SIBDQ score changes were as follows: decrease >10%, 28%; -10%<change<10%, 29%; and increase >10%, 43%. In both the initial SIBDQ and follow-up SIBDQ, scores for items pertaining to systemic symptoms (tension and fatigue) were relatively low. Bowel movement-related problems significantly affect the HRQoL of both UC and CD patients. IBD patients scored lower on SIBDQ items related to general well-being. After 3 years of follow-up at the IBD clinic, 43% of patients showed a significant improvement in HRQoL.

Successful treatment of refractory palmoplantar pustulosis by upadacitinib: report of 28 patients

BackgroundUpadacitinib, a specific JAK1 inhibitor, has minimal effect on other JAK subtypes. It influences the inflammatory process in various ways. Upadacitinib has been approved for conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, atopic dermatitis, and ulcerative colitis in various countries. The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with refractory palmoplantar pustulosis who have not responded to conventional treatments (e.g., Acitretin, Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F, cyclosporine, methotrexate).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective collection of clinical data from 28 patients who received upadacitinib treatment at the Department of Dermatology, First Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University, from July 2022 to December 2023. We evaluated the Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) scores, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores, and Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) scores before and after treatment. We also recorded any adverse events during the treatment process.ResultsA total of 28 patients were diagnosed with PPP, including 10 males and 18 females, and 8 patients (3 males and 5 females) were diagnosed with SAPHO syndrome. The mean age was (36.3 ± 10.5) years. After 12 weeks of treatment, PPPASI scores decreased from baseline (13.86 ± 2.76) to (5.56 ± 1.08), with a statistically significant difference (p &amp;lt; 0.05). DLQI scores decreased from (12.55 ± 4.56) to (2.03 ± 1.13), also showing a statistically significant difference (p &amp;lt; 0.05). Additionally, 20 patients achieved a PGA score of 0/1. No severe adverse events were reported during the treatment and follow-up period.ConclusionUpadacitinib could be an additional safe and effective treatment for treating refractory palmoplantar pustulosis with a potential benefit on patients’ quality of life. Further studies are needed to assess its short-and long-term efficacy and safety in larger sample sizes in randomized double-blind controlled trials.

Association of nutritional counselling with the severity of radiation-induced oral mucositis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective study

BackgroundRadiation oral mucositis (RIOM) is one of the most common side effects of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The nutritional status of the body is an important factor affecting the efficacy of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, as well as the prognosis of patients. The aim of the study was to explore the relationship between nutrition counseling (NC) and radiation-induced oral mucositis (RIOM), and to provide a reference for the prevention and treatment of RIOM in clinical practice. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the data among 147 NPC patients who received radical radiotherapy. Patients were divided into NC group and control group and radiation-induced Oral Mucositis (RIOM) classification i.e. mild RIOM (grade 0–1 group) and severe RIOM (grade≥2 group). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to analyze the association between baseline data of the patients and severity of RIOM. ResultsOf the 147 patients with NPC, there were 46.9% (69/147) patients who received NC, while control group accounted for 53.1% (78/147). There was no statistically significant difference in age, gender, stage, smoking, drinking, body mass index (BMI) before RT, Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) score and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score between NC group and control group. However, there was a significant difference in the incidence of severe RIOM patients between NC group and control group (40.6% vs. 69.2%). Univariate analysis showed that NPC patients had PG-SGA score≥4 (P<0.001; HR : 0.14; 95% CI: 0.04–0.45), the amplitude of weight loss (WL) ≥3% (P<0.001; HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.50–0.77), lower hemoglobin (P=0.01; HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95–0.99) and patients with NC (P<0.001; HR: 3.24; 95% CI: 1.64–6.40) were significantly associated with severe RIOM. Multivariate analysis showed that PG-SGA≥4 (P=0.23; HR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.06–0.86) and WL≥3% (P<0.001; HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.50–0.80) were risk factors for severe RIOM, whereas receiving nutrition consultation was a protective factor (P=0.03; HR: 2.49; 95% CI: 1.09–5.66). ConclusionNC was beneficial in reducing severe RIOM and PG-SGA≥4. WL≥3% exacerbate severe RIOM.

Management of 10 Children With Inflammatory Rosacea With Topical Ivermectin.

Rosacea diagnosis and treatment in children are challenging, due to its rarity and to the lack of approved pharmacological agents for its treatment in this age group. In this case series, response to treatment with once daily applications of ivermectin (IVM) 1% cream for 12 weeks in 10 children affected by mild to severe inflammatory rosacea was evaluated clinically by Investigator Erythema Severity Assessment (IESA), Investigator Global Assessment of Severity (IGA-S), Investigator Global Assessment score of Global Efficacy (IGA-GE), and instrumentally by dermoscopy and Erythema-Directed Digital Photography (EDDP). Clinical improvement was achieved at the end of treatment compared to baseline (IESA: 2.3 vs. 0.5; IGA-S: 2.1 vs. 0.3) and confirmed by IGA-GE (0 = 55%, 1 = 33%, 3 = 11%) and instrumental monitoring (EDDP: 2.7 vs. 0.6). Once daily IVM application may be an effective therapeutic option for children with rosacea.

Dupilumab is Efficacious in Young Children with Atopic Dermatitis Regardless of Type2 Comorbidities.

Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) often have other comorbid type2 inflammatory conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of type2 comorbidities on the response to and safety of dupilumab in young children with AD. LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL partB was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in children aged 6months to 5years with moderate-to-severe AD. In this posthoc analysis, patients were stratified by the presence or absence of caregiver-reported selected type2 comorbidities at baseline: asthma, allergic rhinitis (AR), and food allergies (FAs). At week16, significantly more patients receiving dupilumab versus placebo, with or without asthma and AR, achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0/1 and a ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (all p < 0.05). Significantly more patients receiving dupilumab versus placebo with FAs and numerically more patients without FAs achieved an IGA score of 0/1 (p = 0.0007 and p = 0.06). Numerically more patients receiving dupilumab versus placebo with asthma and significantly more patients without asthma achieved a ≥ 4-point reduction in the weekly average of daily score on the Worst Scratch/Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WSI-NRS) (p = 0.6 and p < 0.0001). Additionally, significantly more patients receiving dupilumab versus placebo with or without AR (p = 0.008 and p < 0.0001) and with or without FAs (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.004) achieved a ≥ 4-point reduction in the weekly average of daily score on the WSI-NRS. Overall safety was consistent with the known dupilumab safety profile. Dupilumab treatment improves AD signs and symptoms in children aged 6months to 5years with and without type2 comorbidities such as asthma, AR, and FAs. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT03346434. Do type 2 comorbidities impact the response to dupilumab in children with atopic dermatitis? (MP4 103,451 KB).

The regulatory T cell-selective interleukin-2 receptor agonist rezpegaldesleukin in the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases: two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1b trials

Regulatory T cell (Treg) impairment is implicated in the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory diseases, but relatively little is known about the therapeutic potential of Treg restoration. Here we present clinical evidence for the Treg-selective interleukin-2 receptor agonist rezpegaldesleukin (REZPEG) in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1b trials in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) (NCT04081350) or chronic plaque psoriasis (PsO) (NCT04119557). Key inclusion criteria for AD included an Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥ 16 and a validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) ≥ 3, and for PsO included a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score of ≥ 12 and a static Physician’s Global Assessment (sPGA) score of ≥ 3. REZPEG is safe and well-tolerated and demonstrates consistent pharmacokinetics in participants receiving subcutaneous doses of 10 to 12 µg/kg or 24 µg/kg once every 2 weeks for 12 weeks, meeting the primary and secondary objectives, respectively. AD patients receiving the higher dose demonstrate an 83% improvement in EASI score after 12 weeks of treatment. EASI improvement of ≥ 75% (EASI-75) and vIGA-AD responses are maintained for 36 weeks after treatment discontinuation in 71% and 80% of week 12 responders, respectively. These exploratory clinical improvements are accompanied by sustained increases in CD25bright Tregs. REZPEG thus represents a homeostatic approach to cutaneous disease therapy and holds clinical potential in providing long-term, treatment-free disease control.

Long-term efficacy and safety of stapokibart for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: 52-week results from a phase 3 trial.

Management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) needs long-term therapy. Stapokibart is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-4 receptor α subunit (IL-4Rα), a shared receptor for IL-4 and IL-13 which are key pathogenic drivers of AD. In a pivotal phase 3 trial (NCT05265923), significant higher proportions of adult AD patients receiving stapokibart than placebo achieved ≥75% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75; 66.9% vs. 25.8%) and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0/1 with ≥2-point reduction (44.2% vs. 16.1%) at Week 16. Herein, we report long-term (52 weeks) efficacy and safety of stapokibart from this trial. After 16-week double-blind treatment completed, patients in both stapokibart and placebo groups entered a 36-week maintenance treatment period and received stapokibart 300 mg every 2 weeks. Concomitant use of topical medications for AD was permitted throughout the maintenance period. Of 476 patients entering maintenance period, 430 completed the treatment. At Week 52, EASI-75 was achieved in 92.5% of patients continuing stapokibart and 88.7% of those switching from placebo to stapokibart, respectively; an IGA score of 0 or 1 with a ≥2-point reduction was achieved in 67.3% and 64.2% of patients, respectively; a ≥4-point reduction in weekly average of daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) was achieved in 67.3% and 60.5% of patients, respectively. Over the 52-week treatment period, 88.1% of patients reported treatment-emergent adverse events, most were mild or moderate. Long-term treatment with stapokibart demonstrated a sustained efficacy and favorable safety profile in adults with moderate-to-severe AD.

Long-term management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with lebrikizumab and concomitant topical corticosteroids: a 68-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial in Japan (ADhere-J).

Moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) impacts patients' quality of life (QOL). More treatment options are urgently needed to manage this chronic disease. Lebrikizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to IL-13, a key mediator in AD pathogenesis. In Japanese patients, lebrikizumab has been evaluated through week (W) 16 in the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III ADhere-J study. To evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) in the ADhere-J study. Patients aged ≥12 years and weighing ≥40 kg with moderate-to-severe AD, and receiving either subcutaneous lebrikizumab 250 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W)/every 4 weeks (Q4W) or placebo during the 16-week induction period, were evaluated during the long-term maintenance period from W16 to W68. Responders achieved co-primary endpoints at W16: Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (IGA [0,1]) with ≥2-point improvement from baseline, and/or ≥75% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75). In this analysis, W16 responders received lebrikizumab 250 mg Q2W or Q4W combined with TCS during the maintenance period (maintenance primary population; MPP); W16 per-protocol nonresponders received lebrikizumab Q2W with TCS (maintenance escape population; MEP). Major endpoints included IGA (0,1) with ≥2-point improvement from baseline and EASI 75 through W68. Other outcomes included QOL, itch, and serum thymus and activation-regulated chemokine. At W68, 66-81% of 103 patients in the MPP and 32-38% of 168 patients in the MEP achieved IGA (0,1) with ≥2-point improvement from baseline. EASI 75 was maintained by 83-89% of patients in the MPP, while 71-80% of patients in the MEP achieved this outcome by W68. Across treatment arms, patients in the MPP tended to maintain improvements recorded at W16, while patients in the MEP steadily improved across the maintenance period. No new safety signals were reported, and most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate in severity in both populations. Safety outcomes were consistent with previous reports for lebrikizumab treatment in global studies. These results support the use of lebrikizumab in combination with TCS for moderate-to-severe AD in the Japanese population over the long term. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04760314).

Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, in patients from China mainland, Taiwan, and South Korea with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial.

Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, is approved in the United States, European Union, Japan, South Korea, China, and other countries for treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib in Asian patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. In the 52-week, blinded, phase 3 POETYK PSO-3 trial (NCT04167462), patients were randomized 1 : 2 to placebo (n = 74) or deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily (n = 146) for 16 weeks followed by deucravacitinib alone. Coprimary endpoints were achievement of ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) and static Physician Global Assessment score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) (sPGA 0/1) at Week 16. Efficacy and safety were evaluated throughout. At Week 16, significantly higher proportions of patients receiving deucravacitinib versus placebo achieved PASI 75 (68.8% vs. 8.1%; P < 0.0001) and sPGA 0/1 (55.6% vs. 6.8%; P < 0.0001). Response rates with deucravacitinib were maintained through Week 52. Common adverse events included upper respiratory tract infection and nasopharyngitis. Serious adverse event and discontinuation rates were low. Deucravacitinib was efficacious and well tolerated in Asian patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Real-World Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Dupilumab in Bullous Pemphigoid: An Ambispective Multicenter Case Series.

Bullous pemphigoid affects elderly individuals with multiple comorbidities, making conventional treatments unsuitable. Evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of bullous pemphigoid. A multicenter ambispective cohort study was conducted in 34 hospitals. Patients with bullous pemphigoid treated with Dupilumab were included. Most of patients (97.1%) received an initial 600 mg dose followed by 300 mg every two weeks. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving complete remission within 4 weeks, defined as Investigator Global Assessment score of 0 or 1. Complete remission at weeks 16, 24, and 52, adverse events, reductions in peak pruritus numerical rating scale, and systemic glucocorticoid use were also assessed. The study included 103 patients with a median age of 77.3 years, 58.0% male. Complete remission was achieved by 53.4% within 4 weeks and 95.7% by week 52. Peak pruritus scale reduced by 70.0% by week 4 and was completely controlled by week 24. Thirteen patients presented adverse events, most of which were mild. Systemic glucocorticoid use reduced by 82.1% by week 52. Shorter disease duration and exclusive cutaneous involvement predicted better response at 16 weeks. No differences in response rates to dupilumab were observed between drug-associated bullous pemphigoid and idiopathic cases. No significant difference in response rates was observed between patients treated with dupilumab in monotherapy and those receiving dupilumab with concomitant treatments. Dupilumab is effective, rapid, and safe in managing bullous pemphigoid, reducing the need for corticosteroids and other treatments. Early initiation and exclusive skin involvement predict better outcomes.

Repeated intravesical injections of platelet-rich plasma are safe and effective in the treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome

ABSTRACT Objectives: Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) is a challenging chronic inflammatory condition affecting the urinary bladder, with limited treatment options. This study aims to assess the clinical efficacy of repeated intravesical platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections for promoting urothelial regeneration and reducing inflammation in patients with IC/BPS and investigate its correlation with subjective and objective treatment-related outcomes. Materials and Methods: Four monthly intravesical PRP injections were given to 98 patients with non-Hunner-type IC/BPS. Treatment outcomes were assessed using a global response assessment (GRA) score 3 months posttreatment. In addition, clinical symptom scores, pain severity, voiding diary data, uroflowmetry parameters, and GRA scores were compared before and after treatment and between different treatment outcome groups (satisfactory: GRA≥2 unsatisfactory: GRA&lt;2). Baseline urine biomarkers were analyzed to identify potential treatment outcome predictors. Results: After four PRP injections, 54 (55.1%) patients reported satisfactory outcomes. Lower urinary tract symptoms, bladder pain, urinary frequency, anxiety, and flow rate significantly improved from baseline (P &lt; 0.05) in all patients, regardless of the treatment outcome. All patients experienced improved treatment outcomes and increased maximum bladder capacity with successive PRP treatments, and no major complications were reported. Urine biomarkers indicated elevated inflammation and oxidative stress biomarkers in patients with IC/BPS compared to controls. Conclusion: Repeated PRP injections are safe and effective for reducing symptoms and bladder pain and improving bladder capacity in a majority of IC/BPS patients, with better outcomes observed in patients with a mild form of bladder inflammation. These results support PRP as a promising novel bladder therapy for IC/BPS.

A 3-Year Multicentric Study on Switching from Ustekinumab to Guselkumab in Partial Responders with Psoriasis-IL PSO (Italian Landscape Psoriasis).

Guselkumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeting the p19 subunit of interleukin-23 (IL-23), has shown efficacy in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. However, long-term real-world data on its effectiveness in patients with inadequate response to ustekinumab are limited. This study investigates guselkumab's long-term effectiveness and safety in patients with psoriasis with partial response to ustekinumab. We performed a retrospective multicentric study analyzing data of patients with psoriasis from seven Italian hospitals between January 2021 and May 2024. The study included 169 patients who switched from ustekinumab to guselkumab. Primary endpoints were Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75, PASI 90, PASI 100, and absolute PASI ≤ 2. Site-specific Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scores were also collected for difficult-to-treat areas. The study included 169 patients. After 3years of treatment, PASI 75, PASI 90 and PASI 100 were achieved by 88.4%, 55.8%, and 32.6% of patients, respectively. Site-specific PGA showed significant improvements, especially in the scalp and genital areas. After 3years of treatment, no significant impact of higher body mass index (BMI) or cardiometabolic comorbidities on guselkumab effectiveness was detected. No severe adverse events were reported during the study period. In our study, guselkumab provided significant long-term effectiveness and safety in patients partially responsive to ustekinumab, improving both PASI score and site-specific PGA and confirming its potential use for patients with psoriasis switching from ustekinumab.