Dr. Arora starts this book with the question on judicial independence and liberty of judicial expression on the bench and of the bench. Some judges are prone to make carping remarks about individuals and organizations during the hearing or in their judgments which get headlines in the media. The justification for such remarks has been the subject of academic discussion. A measure of aloofness from political controversy has to be an essential part of judges life. Judges are human beings and they cannot be expected from withholding their own opinions – sometimes strong which may or may not be warranted. What is not warranted is the expression of the same in the public. Judges, we should remember, are human beings, not disembodied spirits; they respond to human emotions. The great tides and currents which engulf the rest of mankind, in the words of Cardozo do not turn aside in their course and pass the judges idly by. Yes notwithstanding the human factor the courts operate in a setting that forces responsibility upon them. Judges are bound within the walls, lines, and limits that are often unseen by the laymen – walls, lines and limits built from the heritage of the law; the impact of the cases as they come down through the years; the regard for precedent, the self imposed practice of judicial restraint, in brief, the tradition of the law. It is also an essential requisite for a judge to acquire a certain amount of detachment and the discernment, so that he is not carried away by popular catch words and shibboleths. He must always beware of the danger which underlines the disposition to take the immediate for the eternal, the transitory for the permanent and the ephemeral for the timeless. This necessarily calls for a determined resistance to the hypothecation of the thinking process unwarranted remarks in the course of hearings have to be avoided, nor should a judge be given to over-speaking. If he does so, he lends himself to the charge of ill tuned symbol. (pp. ix-x) The book is very important collection of case law on the subject as it tells that the language to be used by the judge whether positively or negatively must be judicious. It tells judicious means which are required by the judicial function of a judge. It also tells that a judicial function is the due process and due process is a process which promotes dignity of mankind and mankind includes the judge and all actors in the process. This classic book is a primer which must be read, inter alia, by our students, our professors, our judges, our law professionals, and our social scientists. It will create a light within their hearts and will make it easy for them as to how much is useful to remain reasonable, logical, moderate, appropriate, cooperative, coordinating, and proving themselves as guards and security and guaranteeing safety throughout. When the object of all is to establish the truth and reality, no corner should be left to allow falsity in the society whether the level is individual, collective, international or even universal.