Gestational Weight Gain Goals Research Articles

Effect of Gestational Weight Gain on Overweight and Obese Pregnant Women

Objective: To examine the adherence of gestational weight gain (GWG) recommendations and pregnancy outcomes among overweight and obese pregnant women.Materials and Methods: The medical records of 405 overweight or obese pregnant women who delivered at Siriraj Hospital between September 2018 and June 2019 were reviewed. The adherence to GWG recommendations according to pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) was examined. The characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of the overweight and obese pregnancies as well as between the adherence and non-adherence to the GWG recommendations groups were studied and compared between the groups.Results: Adherence to the GWG recommendations between the overweight and obese pregnancy groups were significantly different at 60.2% and 44% respectively (p-value = 0.002), although the average GWG was significantly lower in the obese than overweight pregnancies (p-value = 0.003). Pre-pregnancy BMI was significantly higher in the non-adherence group compared with the adherence group (p-value = 0.025). Pregnancy outcomes as well as the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus between these two groups were comparable. Also, adverse pregnancy outcomes were not statistically significantly different among the adherence and non-adherence groups.Conclusion: The adherence to gestational weight gain recommendations in obese and overweight pregnancies is still a challenge. Obese pregnant women are less likely to control weight gain during pregnancy. Pre-pregnancy BMI is an important factor for overweight and obese pregnant women to achieve the GWG goal. Ensuring a proper GWG alone might not improve most adverse pregnancy outcomes in overweight and obese pregnancies.

Helping Individuals Achieve a Healthy Weight Gain During Pregnancy: A Multipronged Approach

Approximately half of pregnant individuals in the United States exceed recommendations for gestational weight gain (GWG). Excessive GWG is associated with negative outcomes for maternal and infant health. In this article, we provide guidance to nurses who counsel patients about GWG. Because of negative bias toward persons with obesity, nurses need to understand their own attitudes toward obesity to provide supportive GWG counseling. The use of words such as weight is preferred to obese, and recommended GWG goals should be consistent with established guidelines. The setting of specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and trackable behavioral goals can help translate a goal for GWG into practical actions in daily living. Mobile phone apps, if carefully chosen, may help individuals learn about and track GWG.

343 Evaluating compliance with a remote self-monitoring weight program in low risk women and perinatal outcomes

To compare gestational weight gain (GWG), postpartum weight retention (PPWR) and other perinatal outcomes according to compliance with a remote self-monitoring weight program in low-risk women. Women were recruited in the first trimester for the Babyscripts program, which provided a mobile application, educational resources and an internet-connected digital scale during 2016-2018 from a single hospital-based clinic. Women with pre-gravid BMI ≤ 38, single gestation and without pre-existing diabetes or hypertension were invited to participate. Participants were instructed to weigh themselves weekly from initiation of the program to delivery. Demographics, GWG, PPWR and other outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical records. Compliance was defined as weights recorded for ≥ 50% of weeks during participation. GWG and PPWR were analyzed as weight differences from first prenatal visit to delivery and 4-12 weeks postpartum, respectively. GWG goals were calculated using the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines for GWG per pre-gravid body mass index (BMI). Of the 442 women who participated, 298 (69%) were compliant (median of 22.5 weeks of weight measurements) and 135 (31%) were noncompliant (median of 7 weeks of weight measurements). There were significantly more nulliparas in the compliant group (68% vs. 54%, p=0.005) and more normal weight, less overweight, and less obese women in the compliant group (p=0.03). Mean GWG (13.4 kg ± 8.6 vs. 13.3 kg ± 5.3, p=0.91) and mean PPWR (3.0 kg ± 3.7 vs. 3.5 kg ± 4.6, p=0.46) were similar in compliant compared to noncompliant groups. There were no differences in GWG goals of inadequate (28% vs. 19%), adequate (40% vs. 44%), or excessive (33% vs. 36%), p=0.18. There were no differences in gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery or birthweight between the groups, p>0.05 for all comparisons. Compliance with a remote self-monitoring program of perinatal weight was higher among nulliparous, normal weight low-risk women, but there were no differences in GWG, PPWR, or other perinatal outcomes.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)

Suggested Gestational Weight Gain for Chinese Women and Comparison with Institute of Medicine Criteria: A Large Population-Based Study

Objective: To establish suggested gestational weight gain (GWG) using several distinct methods in a Chinese population. Methods: This study analyzed data from the medical records of singleton pregnancy women during 2011–2017 in Beijing, China. Suggested GWG was calculated using four distinct methods. In method 1, suggested GWG was identified by the interquartile method. Subsequently, risk models for small for gestational age (SGA) and large for gestational age (LGA) with respect to GWG were constructed. GWG was treated as a continuous variable in method 2, and as a categorized variable in methods 3 and 4. Results: An average GWG of 15.78 kg with a prevalence of LGA at 19.34% and SGA at 2.12% was observed among the 34,470 participants. Methods 1 and 2 did not yield clinically applicable results. The suggested GWGs were 11–17/11–16 kg, 9–19/9–15 kg, 4–12/4–10 kg, and 0–12/0–6 kg by method 3/method 4 for underweight, normal-weight, overweight, and obese women, respectively. The GWG range suggested by method 3 resulted in a larger proportion of participants (62.03%) within range, while the suggested GWG range by method 4 was associated with a lower risk of LGA compared to that conferred by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) criteria. Conclusion: This study suggests a modest GWG goal compared to IOM recommendations based on a large Chinese cohort.

A Personalized Bayesian Approach for Early Intervention in Gestational Weight Gain Management Toward Pregnancy Care

Pre-pregnancy body mass index and weight gain management are associated with pregnancy outcomes in expecting women. Poor gestational weight gain (GWG) management could increase the risk of adverse complications. These risks can be alleviated by lifestyle based interventions if undesired GWG trend is detected early on in the pregnancy. Current literature lacks analysis of gestational weight gain data and tracking the pregnancy over time. In this work, we collected longitudinal gestational weight gain data from women during their pregnancy and model their weight measurements to predict the end-of-pregnancy weight gain and classify it in accordance with the medically recommended guidelines. The measurement frequency of the weights is often very variable such that segments of data can be missing and the need to predict early utilising few data points complicates data modelling. We propose a Bayesian approach to forecast weight gain while effectively dealing with the limited data availability for early prediction. We validate on diverse populations from Europe and China. We show that utilising individual’s data only up to mid-way through the pregnancy, our approach produces mean absolute errors of 2.45 kgs and 2.82 kgs in forecasting end-of-pregnancy weight gain on these populations respectively, whereas the best of state-of- the-art yields 8.17 and 6.60 kgs on respective populations. The proposed method can serve as a tool to keep track of individual’s pregnancy and achieve GWG goals, thus supporting the prevention of excessive or insufficient weight gain during pregnancy.

The impact of setting a pregnancy weight gain goal on total weight gain.

Expert groups recommend that women set a pregnancy weight gain goal with their care provider to optimise weight gain. Our aim was to describe the concordance between first-trimester personal and provider pregnancy weight gain goals with the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations and to determine the association between these goals and total weight gain. We used data from 9353 women in the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: monitoring mothers-to-be. In the first trimester, women reported their personal pregnancy weight gain goal and their provider weight gain goal, and we categorised personal and provider weight gain goals and total weight gain according to IOM recommendations. We used log-binomial or linear regression models to relate goals to total weight gain, adjusting for confounders including race/ethnicity, maternal age, education, smoking, marital status and planned pregnancy. Approximately 37% of women reported no weight gain goals, while 24% had personal and provider goals, 31% had only a personal goal, and 8% had only a provider goal. Personal and provider goals were outside the recommended ranges in 12%-23% of normal-weight women, 31%-41% of overweight women and 47%-63% of women with obesity. Women with both personal and provider pregnancy weight gain goals were 6%-14% more likely than their counterparts to have a goal within IOM-recommended ranges. Having any goal or a goal within the IOM-recommended ranges was unrelated to pregnancy weight gain. Excessive weight gain occurred in approximately half of normal-weight or obese women and three-quarters of overweight women, regardless of goal setting group. These findings do not support the effectiveness of early-pregnancy personal or provider gestational weight gain goal setting alone in optimising weight gain. Multifaceted interventions that address a number of mediators of goal setting success may assist women in achieving weight gain consistent with their goals.

The association between personal weight gain goals, provider recommendations, and appropriate gestational weight gain

Nearly half of all women exceed the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines for gestational weight gain. Excess gestational weight gain is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Our objective was to determine whether having a personal gestational weight gain goal consistent with the Institute of Medicine's recommendations for appropriate gestational weight gain and whether having a discussion with one's obstetrical provider regarding that goal were associated with appropriate gestational weight gain. This is a secondary analysis of the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-To-Be study, a prospective cohort study of nulliparous women. We asked women at their first study visit (between 6 and 13 weeks' gestation) whether they had a gestational weight gain goal and what that goal was. Furthermore, we asked whether their provider discussed a gestational weight gain goal and what that goal was. We classified personal and provider-recommended gestational weight gain goals as consistent or inconsistent with the Institute of Medicine guidelines, taking into account a woman's initial body mass index category (underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese). We included women with live singleton term deliveries (between 37 and 43 weeks' gestation) in this analysis. We classified the primary outcome, which was gestational weight gain (defined as the difference between first visit weight and final weight before delivery), as inadequate, appropriate, or excessive, based on the Institute of Medicine guidelines and initial body mass index category. We used Student t, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and chi-square tests for bivariable analyses, and multinomial logistic regression was performed to control for confounding variables. Of 6727 eligible women, 3799 (56.5% of all eligible women) stated they had a gestational weight gain goal. Of the 3799 women with a stated goal, 2589 (38.5% of all women) had a goal consistent with the Institute of Medicine's recommendations. In addition, of the 6727 eligible women, 2188 (32.5%) reported that they discussed gestational weight gain with their provider, and 1548 of these (23.0% of all women) recalled that their provider gave a gestational weight gain goal in accordance with the Institute of Medicine guidelines. Although having any gestational weight gain goal was not associated with appropriate gestational weight gain, having a gestational weight gain goal that was consistent with the Institute of Medicine's recommendations was associated with a reduced risk of excessive (adjusted relative risk ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.92) and inadequate weight gain (adjusted relative risk ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.82). Conversely, discussing gestational weight gain goals with a provider was not associated with either inadequate or excessive gestational weight gain even if the provider's recommendations for gestational weight gain were consistent with the guidelines. Nulliparas who delivered singleton pregnancies at term who had a personal gestational weight gain goal consistent with the Institute of Medicine's recommendations were less likely to have excessive or inadequate gestational weight gain. Further study is required to evaluate the most effective way to communicate this information to patients.

Gestational Weight Gain Video Module Improves Patient Knowledge of Weight Gain in Pregnancy [12D

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 70% of pregnant women gain weight outside of the National Academy of Medicine's established guidelines for gestational weight gain (GWG) in pregnancy. We set out to determine if a GWG video module improves patient knowledge of GWG goals. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed from January 2019 through August 2019 with Institutional Review Board approval. Women were allocated to routine care versus a video arm after informed consent was obtained. Both arms completed a baseline GWG knowledge questionnaire. Those undergoing routine care received provider counseling. Those in the video arm underwent routine counseling and viewed a 5-minute video module based on the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and National Academy of Medicine approved material on body mass index (BMI) specific GWG goals. The GWG knowledge questionnaire was repeated in 4 weeks. Maternal demographics and baseline characteristics were collected from the electronic medical record. Independent sample t-tests, chi square analyses and Fisher exact tests were used to compare arms, with a P<.05 deemed statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 52 women were included in the study, 26 in the routine counseling arm and 26 in the video module arm. Maternal demographics and baseline characteristics including BMI were similar between groups. Compared to routine counseling, women in the video module arm had a statistically significant increase in GWG knowledge (10.0±2.0 versus 12.5±2.3, P<.001). CONCLUSION: Compared to routine provider counseling, a GWG video module significantly improves patients' knowledge of GWG goals. Utilization of a GWG video enhances provider counseling.

Targeting pregnancy-related weight gain to reduce disparities in obesity: Baseline results from the Healthy Babies trial

BackgroundObesity affects African American women more than any other group in the US. Pregnancy represents a critical life stage of heightened vulnerability for new or persistent obesity, yet few interventions have been effective in reducing excessive gestational weight gain among African American women. We describe the design and baseline findings of Healthy Babies, a two-arm randomized controlled trial testing a mobile health intervention to minimize excessive gestational weight gain versus usual care in this high risk group. MethodsAfrican American women in early pregnancy were recruited from two large obstetric practices as well as Philadelphia Women, Infants, and Children's clinics. Participants randomized to the intervention received behavior change goals, daily text messages with feedback, web-based weight gain graphs, health coaching, and a Facebook support group. Data collection included baseline (<22 weeks' gestation), 36-38 weeks' gestation, and 6-month postpartum anthropometric measures and assessments of demographics, contextual factors and behavioral targets. The primary outcome was prevalence of excessive gestational weight gain. ResultsAmong participants at baseline (n = 262), the majority met criteria for obesity (63%), were multiparous (62%), single (77%), and were on average 25.6 ± 5.4 years old with a gestational age of 13.9 ± 4.1 weeks. While 82% completed high school, 61% met criteria for inadequate health literacy. Nearly 20% were food insecure. Eighty-eight percent reported a gestational weight gain goal discordant with Institute of Medicine guidelines. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between study arms. ConclusionsParticipants represent a high-risk group for excessive gestational weight gain with demonstrated need for intervention.

Gestational weight gain and group prenatal care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundGroup visits for chronic medical conditions in non-pregnant populations have demonstrated successful outcomes including greater weight loss compared to individual visits for weight management. It is plausible that group prenatal care can similarly assist women in meeting gestational weight gain goals. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of group vs. traditional prenatal care on gestational weight gain.MethodsA keyword search of Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of s of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar was performed up to April 2017. Studies were included if they compared gestational weight gain in a group prenatal care setting to traditional prenatal care in either randomized controlled trials, cohort, or case-control studies. The primary and secondary outcomes were excessive and adequate gestational weight gain according to the Institute of Medicine guidelines. Heterogeneity was assessed with the Q test and I2 statistic. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and confidence intervals (CI) were reported with random-effects models from the randomized controlled trials (RCT) and cohort studies.ResultsOne RCT, one secondary analysis of an RCT, one study with “random assignment”, and twelve cohort studies met the inclusion criteria for a total of 13,779 subjects. Thirteen studies used the CenteringPregnancy model, defined by 10 sessions that emphasize goal setting and self-monitoring. Studies targeted specific populations such as adolescents, African-Americans, Hispanics, active-duty military or their spouses, and women with obesity or gestational diabetes. There were no significant differences in excessive [7 studies: pooled rates 47% (1806/3582) vs. 43% (3839/8521), RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.97–1.23] or adequate gestational weight gain [6 studies: pooled rates 31% (798/2875) vs. 30% (1410/5187), RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.79–1.08] in group and traditional prenatal care among the nine studies that reported categorical gestational weight gain outcomes in the meta-analysis.ConclusionsGroup prenatal care was not associated with excessive or adequate gestational weight gain in the meta-analysis. Since outcomes were overall inconsistent, we propose that prenatal care models (e.g., group vs. traditional) should be evaluated in a more rigorous fashion with respect to gestational weight gain.

Testing the Feasibility of Remote Patient Monitoring in Prenatal Care Using a Mobile App and Connected Devices: A Prospective Observational Trial.

BackgroundExcessive weight gain and elevated blood pressure are significant risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes such as gestational diabetes, premature birth, and preeclampsia. More effective strategies to facilitate adherence to gestational weight gain goals and monitor blood pressure may have a positive health benefit for pregnant women and their babies. The impact of utilizing a remote patient monitoring system to monitor blood pressure and weight gain as a component of prenatal care has not been previously assessed.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of monitoring patients remotely in prenatal care using a mobile phone app and connected digital devices.MethodsIn this prospective observational study, 8 women with low risk pregnancy in the first trimester were recruited at an urban academic medical center. Participants received a mobile phone app with a connected digital weight scale and blood pressure cuff for at-home data collection for the duration of pregnancy. At-home data was assessed for abnormal values of blood pressure or weight to generate clinical alerts to the patient and provider. As measures of the feasibility of the system, participants were studied for engagement with the app, accuracy of remote data, efficacy of alert system, and patient satisfaction.ResultsPatient engagement with the mobile app averaged 5.5 times per week over the 6-month study period. Weight data collection and blood pressure data collection averaged 1.5 times and 1.1 times per week, respectively. At-home measurements of weight and blood pressure were highly accurate compared to in-office measurements. Automatic clinical alerts identified two episodes of abnormal weight gain with no false triggers. Patients demonstrated high satisfaction with the system.ConclusionsIn this pilot study, we demonstrated that a system using a mobile phone app coupled to remote monitoring devices is feasible for prenatal care.

A qualitative study of gestational weight gain goal setting.

BackgroundGestational weight gain (GWG) is an important predictor of short and long-term pregnancy outcomes for both mother and child, and women who set a GWG goal are more likely to gain within recommended ranges. Little information is available regarding potentially modifiable factors that underlie a woman’s GWG goals. Our aims were to explore women’s perceptions regarding factors that affect GWG, their understanding of appropriate GWG, their goal-setting experiences including patient-health care provider (HCP) conversations, and supportive interventions they would most like to help them achieve the recommended GWG.MethodsWe conducted nine in-depth interviews and seven focus groups with a total of 33 Boston, Massachusetts (MA) area women who were pregnant and had delivered within the prior 6 months. We recorded and transcribed all interviews. Two investigators independently coded resulting transcripts. We managed data using MAXQDA2 and conducted a content analysis.ResultsPerceived factors that contributed to GWG goal-setting included the mother’s weight control behaviors concerning exercise and diet—including a “new way of eating for two” and “semblance of control”, experiences during prior pregnancies, conversations with HCPs, and influence from various information sources. Women focused on behaviors with consistent messaging across multiple sources of information, but mainly trusted their HCP, valued one-to-one conversations with them about GWG, preferred that the HCP initiate the conversation about GWG goals, and would be open to have the conversation started based on visual aid based on their own GWG progression.ConclusionsPregnant women highly value discussions with their HCP to set GWG goals. Pregnant women view their clinicians as the most reliable source of information and believe that clinicians should open weight-related discussions throughout pregnancy.

A Qualitative Study to Examine Perceptions and Barriers to Appropriate Gestational Weight Gain among Participants in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women Infants and Children Program.

Women of reproductive age are particularly at risk of obesity because of excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) and postpartum weight retention, resulting in poor health outcomes for both mothers and infants. The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine perceptions and barriers to GWG among low-income women in the WIC program to inform the development of an intervention study. Eleven focus groups were conducted and stratified by ethnicity, and each group included women of varying age, parity, and prepregnancy BMI ranges. Participants reported receiving pressure from spouse and family members to “eat for two” among multiple barriers to appropriate weight gain during pregnancy. Participants were concerned about gaining too much weight but had minimal knowledge of weight gain goals during pregnancy. Receiving regular weight monitoring was reported, but participants had inconsistent discussions about weight gain with healthcare providers. Most were not aware of the IOM guidelines nor the fact that gestational weight gain goals differed by prepregnancy weight status. Results of these focus groups analyses informed the design of a pregnancy weight tracker and accompanying educational handout for use in an intervention study. These findings suggest an important opportunity for GWG education in all settings where pregnant women are seen.

Obesity Before, During, and After Pregnancy: A Review and Comparison of Five National Guidelines.

This study aims to compare how national guidelines approach the management of obesity in reproductive age women. We conducted a search for national guidelines in the English language on the topic of obesity surrounding the time of a pregnancy. We identified six primary source documents and several secondary source documents from five countries. Each document was then reviewed to identify: (1) statements acknowledging increased health risks related to obesity and reproductive outcomes, (2) recommendations for the management of obesity before, during, or after pregnancy. All guidelines cited an increased risk for miscarriage, birth defects, gestational diabetes, hypertension, fetal growth abnormalities, cesarean sections, difficulty with anesthesia, postpartum hemorrhage, and obesity in offspring. Counseling on the risks of obesity and weight loss before pregnancy were universal recommendations. There were substantial differences in the recommendations pertaining to gestational weight gain goals, nutrient and vitamin supplements, screening for gestational diabetes, and thromboprophylaxis among the guidelines. Stronger evidence from randomized trials is needed to devise consistent recommendations for obese reproductive age women. This research may also assist clinicians in overcoming one of the many obstacles they encounter when providing care to obese women.

Gestational weight gain information: seeking and sources among pregnant women.

BackgroundPromoting healthy gestational weight gain (GWG) is important for preventing obstetric and perinatal morbidity, along with obesity in both mother and child. Provision of GWG guidelines by health professionals predicts women meeting GWG guidelines. Research concerning women’s GWG information sources is limited. This study assessed pregnant women’s sources of GWG information and how, where and which women seek GWG information.MethodsConsecutive women (n = 1032) received a mailed questionnaire after their first antenatal visit to a public maternity hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Recalled provision of GWG guidelines by doctors and midwives, recalled provided GWG goals, and the obtaining of GWG information and information sources were assessed.ResultsParticipants (n = 368; 35.7 % response) averaged 32.5 years of age and 20.8 weeks gestation, with 33.7 % speaking a language other than English. One in ten women recalled receiving GWG guidelines from doctors or midwives, of which half were consistent with Institute of Medicine guidelines. More than half the women (55.4 %) had actively sought GWG information. Nulliparous (OR 7.07, 95 % CI = 3.91–12.81) and obese (OR 1.96, 95 % CI = 1.05–3.65) women were more likely to seek information. Underweight (OR 0.29, 95 % CI = 0.09–0.97) women and those working part time (OR 0.52, 95 % CI = 0.28–0.97) were less likely to seek information. Most frequently reported GWG sources included the internet (82.7 %), books (55.4 %) and friends (51.5 %). The single most important sources were identified as the internet (32.8 %), general practitioners (16.9 %) and books (14.9 %).ConclusionMore than half of women were seeking GWG guidance and were more likely to consult non-clinician sources. The small numbers given GWG targets, and the dominance of non-clinical information sources, reinforces that an important opportunity to provide evidence based advice and guidance in the antenatal care setting is currently being missed.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0600-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Obesity in Pregnancy: A Qualitative Approach to Inform an Intervention for Patients and Providers

To investigate perceptions of minority pregnant women and providers about obesity and gestational weight gain (GWG), and to explore strategies to improve management of obesity in pregnancy with an emphasis on group prenatal care. Sixteen primarily non-Hispanic black pregnant women with a body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m(2) and 19 prenatal care providers participated in focus groups. Discussion topics included GWG goals, body image, health behaviors, and group prenatal care with additional emphasis on provider training needs. Women frequently stated a GWG goal >20 lbs. Women described a body image not in line with clinical recommendations ("200 pounds is not that big."). They avoided the term "obese". They were interested in learning about nutrition and culturally-acceptable healthy cooking. Women would enjoy massage and exercise in group settings, though definitions of "exercise" varied. Family members could help, but generational differences posed challenges. Most had to "encourage myself" and "do this for me and the baby". Providers expressed discomfort discussing GWG and difficulty finding the right words for obesity, which was partially attributed to their own weight. They noted the challenges they faced during prenatal care including time constraints, cultural myths, and system issues. Providers considered a group setting with social support an ideal environment to address health behaviors in obese women. Culturally-tailored programs that use acceptable terms for obesity, provide education regarding healthy eating and safe exercise, and encourage support from social networks may be effective in addressing GWG in obese minority women. Provider training in communication skills is necessary to address obesity in pregnancy.

The influence of gestational weight gain on the development of gestational hypertension in obese women.

The objective of this study was to examine the influence of gestational weight gain on the development of gestational hypertension/preeclampsia (GHTN/PE) in women with an obese prepregnancy body mass index (BMI). Obese women with a singleton pregnancy enrolled at < 20 weeks were studied. Data were classified according to reported gestational weight gain (losing weight, under-gaining, within target, and over-gaining) from the recommended range of 11 to 9.7 kg and by obesity class (class 1 = BMI 30-34.9 kg/m(2), class 2 = 35-39.9 kg/m(2), class 3 = 40-49.9 kg/m(2), and class 4 ≥ 50 kg/m(2)). Rates of GHTN/PE were compared by weight gain group overall and within obesity class using Pearson chi-square statistics. For the 27,898 obese women studied, rates of GHTN/PE increased with increasing class of obesity (15.2% for class 1 and 32.0% for class 4). The incidence of GHTN/PE in obese women was not modified with weight loss or weight gain below recommended levels. Overall for obese women, over-gaining weight was associated with higher rates of GHTN/PE compared with those with a target rate for obesity classes 1 to 3 (each p < 0.001). Below recommended gestational weight gain did not reduce the risk for GHTN/PE in women with an obese prepregnancy BMI. These data support a gestational weight gain goal ≤ 9.7 kg in obese gravidas.

Informing maternity service development by surveying new mothers about preferences for nutrition education during their pregnancy in an area of social disadvantage.

A demonstrated link exists between maternal diet and maternal and infant health outcomes during and after pregnancy. A dietetic maternity service (0.6FTE for 3500 births) was introduced in 2012 at our hospital in a socially-disadvantaged area. We needed to develop evidence-based, patient-oriented improvements to nutrition services within resource limitations. This cross-sectional study gathered knowledge, eating behaviours, and nutrition-related needs of our women ante- and postnatally to inform this process. Women (≥ 18 years) admitted to the postnatal ward completed our survey. Data including dietary quality, nutritional knowledge and interest in nutrition education were collected. Analysis included descriptive, chi-squared and t-tests. Three hundred and nine eligible women responded (28 ± 6 years, 27 ± 7 kg/m(2) pre-pregnancy body mass index, 12% gestational diabetes). Two-fifths (42%) self-reported gaining excess weight during pregnancy. One quarter reported knowing their gestational weight gain goals, yet only 1.6% was correct. Half reported interest in receiving nutrition education during pregnancy and post-delivery (45%, n=134; 43%, n=123, respectively). Women had poor diet quality (daily serves - fruit: 1.8 ± 1.0; vegetables: 2.0 ± 1.2; dairy: 1.9 ± 1.2), despite identifying healthy eating as a personal priority. Nutrition topics requested included healthy eating for development of baby pre- and post-delivery and maternal weight management. Women attending our hospital have dietary issues and levels of interest in nutrition similar to women in tertiary maternity centres. Service changes planned will explore formats that meet higher and lower education levels; group workshops may be supplemented by formats such as internet and DVD-delivered education to overcome access and literacy issues, respectively.

Improving Gestational Weight Gain Counseling Through Meaningful Use of an Electronic Medical Record

The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of an intervention to improve the consistency and accuracy of antenatal gestational weight gain counseling through introduction of a "best practice alert" into an electronic medical record (EMR) system. A best practice alert was designed and implemented in the EMR. Based on each patient's pre-gravid body mass index (BMI), fetal number, and 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines, the alert provides an individualized total gestational weight gain goal, the weight gain goal per week of gestation, a template for scripted provider counseling and documentation, and a patient handout containing personalized gestational weight gain information. Retrospective chart reviews of 388 pre-intervention patients and 345 post-intervention patients were used to evaluate effectiveness. Introduction of a gestational weight gain best practice alert into the EMR improved the rate of antenatal gestational weight gain counseling that was consistent with current IOM guidelines (p < 0.001). Improvement in IOM-consistent gestational weight gain counseling was seen across all provider types, including obstetricians, family practice physicians, and certified nurse midwives. The intervention also resulted in significant improvement in documentation of pre-gravid weights and BMIs within the EMR. The EMR is an effective tool for improving the consistency and accuracy of antenatal gestational weight gain counseling in accord with 2009 IOM guidelines.

Behaviours of overweight and obese women during pregnancy who achieve and exceed recommended gestational weight gain

Excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) is associated with increased risk of pregnancy-related complications, postpartum weight retention, and long-term obesity. Little is known about the behavioural habits of pregnant women who achieve and exceed recommended GWG. In 2011, qualitative interviews were conducted in Pennsylvania with postpartum women who were overweight or obese prior to pregnancy to ascertain their behaviours and attitudes regarding dietary habits, physical activity, and self-monitoring during pregnancy. Thematic analysis identified the habits of women who achieved and exceeded recommended GWG guidelines. Of the 29 women interviewed, 11 had appropriate GWG and 18 had excessive GWG. Women achieving appropriate GWG reported modest increases in caloric intake if at all, with deliberate meal and snack planning, while women with excessive GWG described "eating-for-two." Nearly all women with excessive GWG reported exercising less during pregnancy (or remaining sedentary), while women with appropriate GWG largely increased or maintained pre-pregnancy physical activity levels. About half of the sample reported self-monitoring weight gain during pregnancy, but women achieving recommended GWG tied their weight monitoring with GWG goals consistent with recommended guidelines. Women who achieved appropriate GWG reported deliberate dietary habits and physical activity planning, with appropriate GWG goals during pregnancy. Women exceeding recommended GWG described "eating-for-two," were sedentary, and either had no goals for GWG or intended to gain more weight than recommended.