Geosynthetic-encased Stone Column Research Articles

Liquefaction Mitigation of Saturated Sand Using Ordinary, Filtered, and Geosynthetic-encased Stone Columns in Shaking Table Tests

Liquefaction Mitigation of Saturated Sand Using Ordinary, Filtered, and Geosynthetic-encased Stone Columns in Shaking Table Tests

Numerical Stability Analysis of Sloped Geosynthetic Encased Stone Column Composite Foundation under Embankment Based on Equivalent Method

As an effective technology for the rapid treatment of soft-soil foundations, geosynthetic encased stone column (GESC) composite foundations are commonly used in various embankment engineerings, including those situated on sloped soft foundations. Nevertheless, there is still a scarcity of stability studies for sloped GESC composite foundations. Several 3D numerical models for sloped GESC composite foundations were established using an equivalent method. The influences of the area replacement ratio and the tensile strength of geosynthetic encasement on the stability were investigated. The results showed that the stability increased nonlinearly with the area replacement ratio, and there existed an optimal area replacement ratio (e.g., 24.56% in this study) to balance the safety and economic requirements. The stability increased linearly with the tensile strength of geosynthetic encasement at low tensile strength levels (lower than 105 kN/m in this study), and the impact was relatively limited compared with that of the area replacement ratio. In addition, the stability generally decreased nonlinearly as the foundation slope decreased, and high-angle (foundation slope close to 30°) sloped GESC composite foundations are recommended to be treated with multiple reinforcement techniques. The relationship between the minimum area replacement ratio and the foundation slope was further quantified by an exponential function, allowing for the determination of the area replacement ratio of various sloped GESC composite foundations and providing theoretical guidance for engineering practice.

Cyclic response of floating geosynthetic-encased steel slag columns in soft clay

Geosynthetic-encased stone column (GESC) technology for strengthening soft clay offers significant advantages in terms of cost-effectiveness, environmental sustainability, and engineering applicability. It is widely applied in treating soft foundations for railways, bridges, and embankments. This study evaluates the cyclic response of the geosynthetic-encased steel slag column (GESSC) composite foundation employing three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis. A numerical study is conducted to assess the cyclic response of floating GESSC considering the influence of key design variables, including cyclic load amplitude, loading frequency, geosynthetic encasement stiffness, and length-to-diameter ratio. Results show that both cyclic load amplitude and frequency affect the cumulative settlement and excess pore pressure within the GESSC foundation. Within specified limits, increasing the encasement stiffness and column length can significantly improve the GESSC load-bearing characteristics. The parametric study suggests an optimal geosynthetic encasement stiffness for the field prototype columns within the range of 4480–5760 kN/m and a critical steel slag column length of 10 times the column diameter.

Numerical Simulation of the Load Transfer Mechanism of a Geosynthetic Encased Stone Column Unit Cell under Embankment Loading

Numerical Simulation of the Load Transfer Mechanism of a Geosynthetic Encased Stone Column Unit Cell under Embankment Loading

Shear Strength of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns in Unsaturated Soils

Shear Strength of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns in Unsaturated Soils

Effect of Column Material Internal Angle of Friction and the Geotextile Stiffness on the Behavior of Group of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Column

Effect of Column Material Internal Angle of Friction and the Geotextile Stiffness on the Behavior of Group of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Column

Numerical simulation of bending characteristics of geosynthetic encased stone column

A numerical model of the cantilever bending structure of a geosynthetic encased stone column (GESC) of length 3 m and diameter 0.3 m was established using Z-Soil. The aim was to analyze the stress distribution and bending characteristics of the GESC under a bending load and to investigate the impact of encasement strength, encasement stiffness, gravel friction angle, and diameter on the bending characteristics of the GESC. The maximum bending moment of the GESC under bending conditions occurs at the anchored end. The dividing line of tensile and compressive stresses on the gravel in the anchored end section after bending failure appears at a radius of 0.5 of the column above the section centerline. The geosynthetic sleeve exhibits good resistance to tensile stress. The dividing line between the tensile and compressive stresses is located at the centerline of the section. The mechanical properties of the encasements and gravel has a significant impact on bending characteristics of the GESC. Increasing the strength of the encasement and friction angle of the gravel may significantly improve the bending capacity of the GESC, whereas an increase in the stiffness of encasement and diameter of the column decreases the bending deformation of the GESC.

Optimizing ground improvement with encased stone columns: a 3D numerical analysis in very soft clay

Purpose This study aims to investigate the behavior of different types of stone columns, including the short and floating columns, as well as the ordinary and the geosynthetic encased stone columns (OSC and GESC). The effectiveness of the geosynthetic encasement and the impact of the installation using the lateral expansion method on the column performance is evaluated through a three-dimensional (3D) unit cell numerical analysis. Design/methodology/approach A full 3D numerical analysis is carried out using the explicit finite element code PLAXIS 3D to examine the installation influence on settlement reduction (ß), lateral displacement (Ux) and vertical displacement (Uz) relative to different values of lateral expansion of the column (0% to 15%). Findings The findings demonstrate the superior performance of GESC, particularly short columns outperforming floating counterparts. This enhanced performance is attributed to the combined effects of geosynthetic encasement and increased lateral expansion. Notably, these strategies contribute significantly to decreasing lateral displacement (Ux) at the column’s edge and reducing vertical displacement (Uz) under the rigid footing. Originality/value In contrast to previous studies that examined the installation effect of OSC contexts, this paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the effect of geosynthetic encasement and the installation effects using the lateral expansion method in very soft soil, using 3D numerical simulation. The study emphasizes the significance of the consideration of geosynthetic encasement and lateral expansion of the column during the design process to enhance column performance.

Model tests on ordinary and geosynthetic encased stone columns with recycled aggregates as filler material

PurposeSincethe availability of natural aggregates is very sparse, recycled industrial and construction waste provides a sustainable alternative to ground improvement using vibro replacement method. Utilizing recycled building waste caters the requirement for its disposal and offers an effective remedy for the scarcity of natural resources. The aim of this study was to give a sustainable alternative for the natural aggregates as the material for stone column.Materials and methodsA good stone column material should be hard, dense, chemically inert and must comply with the size requirement. The utilization of construction debris and spent railway ballast as column material has been the subject of numerous researches. This work focuses on finding the suitability of railway ballast and concrete debris as alternatives for stone column material. A detailed laboratory testing of these materials has been carried to judge their strength requirements as the material for both Ordinary Stone Columns (OSCs) and Geosynthetic Encased Stone Columns (GESCs). The improvement in capacity of both OSCs and GESCs is evaluated by performing California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test in laboratory by creating unit cell stone column models of different recycled aggregates and comparing their load settlement behavior with natural aggregates.Results and discussionRailway ballast, natural aggregates, concrete debris and virgin soil were found to show decreasing order in CBR test results. Loading required for causing settlement in both OSCs and GESCsshowed remarkable increase as compared to that of virgin clay and the maximum load settlement improvement was observed for railway ballast in both the types of stone columns. The CBR values for GESC made from railway ballast, natural aggregates and concrete debris were 54, 49 and 38% respectively. On the other hand, CBR for OSC made from railway ballast, concrete debris and natural aggregates were found to be 25.5, 20.4 and 24% respectively and CBR of virgin clay was found to be just 11%.ConclusionThe demonstrated application of sustainable sources in place of natural aggregates provides a crucial pathway for utilizing the recycled aggregates as stone column filler material. Up on encasing the OSC with geotextile the performance of stone columns has improved appreciably in terms of load capacity. Railway ballast and concrete debris can be adopted as an alternate for the natural stone column materials to improve the bearing capacity of site consisting mainly of soft clays.

Shaking table tests on the influence of geosynthetic encasement stiffness on the shear reinforcement effect of GESC composite foundation

This paper presents an experimental study of shaking table tests on two geosynthetic encased stone columns (GESC) composite foundation models with different geosynthetic encasement stiffness to investigate the influence of geosynthetic encasement stiffness on the shear reinforcement effect. The reduced-scale GESC composite foundation models were designed according to the similitude relationships by scaling the model geometry, geosynthetic encasement stiffness, and input motions for shaking table tests in a 1 g gravitational field. The GESC composite foundation models were constructed using poorly graded sand, gravel, and geotextile encasement, and then were excited using a series of sinusoidal input motions with increasing peak acceleration. The acceleration amplification factors for the GESC composite foundation model with higher geosynthetic encasement stiffness are larger than those of the lower geosynthetic encasement stiffness model due to the increased stiffness of the composite foundation. The higher geosynthetic encasement stiffness composite foundation has smaller settlements and lateral displacements under the same input motions compared to the lower geosynthetic encasement stiffness composite foundation. The incremental geosynthetic encasement tensile strains increase with increasing input acceleration for both models. The longitudinal tensile effect of geosynthetic encasement plays an important role on the shear reinforcement mechanism of GESC.

Field tests on partially geotextile encased stone column-supported embankment over silty clay

Various researchers have highlighted that geosynthetic-encased stone columns could be used in place of stone columns (SCs) in very soft soil. In this study, field load tests are performed on individual partially geotextile-encased stone columns (pESCs), individual stone columns (SCs), and a field embankment reinforced with pESCs and SCs in silty clay. Although the material cost of pESCs is designed to be comparable to that of SCs, the tests reveal that pESCs display a higher allowable bearing capacity and stress concentration ratio and less residual settlement than SCs. The embankment reinforced by pESCs is found to incur fewer lateral displacements, while there is no improvement in the drainage performance during the construction period compared to the SCs. For the pESCs, 51–66% of the pressure acting on the top of the column propagates to a depth of z = 1.2 m, wheras, for the SCs, it is only 21–55%. Furthermore, to estimate group behaviour, the ultimate bearing capacity of an individual pile composite ground can be extrapolated. However, individual pESCs achieve much higher stress concentration ratios than the pESC group.

Centrifuge investigation on behavior of geosynthetic-encased stone column supported embankment under freeze-thaw cycles

In this paper, two centrifuge tests were conducted on geosynthetic-encased stone column (GESC) supported embankment to investigate the behavior under freeze-thaw cycles considering the effects of initial degree of consolidation and number of freeze-thaw cycles. The embankments with a height of 4.5 m supported by GESC-reinforced foundation with a thickness of 9 m in prototype were first consolidated to initial degrees of consolidation of 30% and 60%, respectively, and then subjected to three freeze-thaw cycles. The results showed that the foundation soil under the embankment toe experienced a higher degree of freezing than the soil outside the embankment with non-uniform frozen depths observed at different positions in soil under the embankment, and that multiple freeze-thaw cycles contributed to extra settlement in the foundation. Both the frost heave and thaw settlement appeared on GESCs prior to soil. During freezing, the stress on GESC increased first, while decreased rapidly when soil began freezing. The stress concentration ratio (SCR) reached nearly 1.0 before complete freezing. After the complete thawing of GESCs, the stress on GESC increased significantly. As the number of freeze-thaw cycles grew, the variation in settlement, stress and pore pressure was reduced. The final settlement on soil was greater in the foundation with lower initial degree of consolidation, as well as the SCR. The GESCs had larger deformation and showed outward bending under lower initial degree of consolidation, but inward bending appeared on GESCs under higher one.

Numerical Analysis on the Behavior of Floating Geogrid-Encased Stone Column Improved Foundation

The ordinary (OSC) and geosynthetic-encased stone column (ESC) with different bearing strata significantly influenced its behavior. The paper established seven models for studying the behavior of floating stone columns using the finite difference method (FDM). The effect of geogrid and column length on the load-settlement behavior, bulging deformation, failure mode, and load transfer coefficient were also analyzed based on proposal models. The results showed that the bearing capacity of F-OSCs and F-ESCs increased with the increase in column and encasement length, respectively, and a critical length (i.e., 4D, where D was the column diameter) was found in settlement improvement. The bulging deformation was significant in F-OSCs and was observed at the top of a long column and the full length of a short column. The geogrid encasement could constrain the OSC to decrease the bulging deformation. The failure mode in F-OSCs was mainly a punching failure with bulging deformation for a short column (e.g., less than 4D), and was relative to the vertical pressure for a long column. The failure mode in F-ESCs was a punching failure, and the punching degree increased with an increase in encasement length. The load transfer coefficient of F-OSCs or F-ESCs was relatively stable as the column length increased to a critical value (e.g., 4D) or the encasement length increased to a critical value (e.g., 4D).

A DEM Study on Bearing Behavior of Floating Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Column in Deep Soft Clays

The use of geosynthetic-encased stone columns has been proven to be an economical and effective method for soft soil foundation treatment. This method is widely used in civil engineering projects at home and abroad. When the geosynthetic-encased stone columns are applied to deep soft clays, they are in a floating state. The load-bearing deformation mechanism of geosynthetic-encased stone columns has changed. The interaction between the aggregates, geogrid, and soil is worth studying, especially at the bottom of the column. In this paper, the discrete element method is used to simulate a floating geosynthetic-encased stone column with a 280 mm encasement depth in deep soft clays. The load-bearing deformation characteristics and mesoscopic mechanism of the floating geosynthetic-encased stone column are studied. The results show that there are large vertical and radial stresses in the top region. Moreover, the porosity and sliding fraction of aggregates in this region increase with settlement, and the coordination number decreases with settlement. The vertical and radial stresses of the soil near the column body are not affected much by the column body. When the encasement depth exceeds 280 mm, the bearing capacity of the FGESC does not increase much. The encasement depth controls the failure mode of the floating geosynthetic-encased stone column. As the encasement depth increases, the failure mode of the floating geosynthetic-encased stone column gradually transitions from swelling deformation to penetration failure.

Numerical Analysis of a Dual-Layer Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Column Installed in Soft Soil

Stone columns are being used to reduce soft soil settlement and increase load-carrying capacity. Since there is inadequate lateral support from the local native soil, soft soil undergoes excessive settlement under vertical loading. This issue is effectively resolved by suitably encasing stone column material by geosynthetic with significant axial stiffness, which provides the required additional confinement reported in the literature. In the current study, an effort has been made to examine the load settlement behaviour of the dual-layered geosynthetic-encased stone column (DL-GESC) under vertical loading. In order to simulate the behaviour of stone column-reinforced soft soil, a FEM analysis was performed using PLAXIS-3D and three-dimensional (3D) models made utilising the unit cell idealisation technique for a single column. The stone column diameter, spacing to diameter (s/d) ratio, and encasement layers were varied to determine their influence on load-settling behaviour. The vertical load-carrying capacity of the ground was significantly improved when an additional layer of geosynthetic encasement was inserted into the stone column as compared to SL-GESC. Improvement of 15–25% was observed for the analysis of a single column installed in soft clay, according to the result obtained. Improvement ratios have been discussed in detail for various encasement conditions.

Construction and Demolition Waste as Valuable Resources for Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns

Construction and Demolition Waste as Valuable Resources for Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns

Bearing Characteristics of Composite Foundation Reinforced by Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Column: Field Tests and Numerical Analyses

In order to study the bearing characteristic of the geosynthetic-encased stone column (GESC) on the composite foundation, a series of field tests and numerical simulation were carried out on the composite foundations reinforced by the traditional stone column and the GESC. The pile–soil stress ratio, excess pore water pressure and lateral displacement of two kinds of composite foundations were monitored. The effects of geotextile stiffness, geotextile wrapping length and gravel internal friction angle on the composite foundation with the GESC were analyzed by establishing different numerical models. The results show that the GESC can bear larger loading compared with the traditional stone column. The pile–soil stress ratio of the composite foundation with the traditional stone column gradually increases from 1.1 to 1.5 with the increasing of the embankment height. However, the pile–soil stress ratio of the composite foundation with the GESC reaches 1.5 at the initial filling stage and increases to 1.7 with the filling construction. The drainage effect of the GESC is better than that of the traditional stone column, and the GESC can effectively improve the overall stiffness of stone column, so as to reduce the lateral displacement of soil mass. The increases of geotextile stiffness, geotextile wrapping length and gravel internal friction angle can improve the bearing performance of the composite foundation with the GESC. However, after geotextile stiffness and wrapping length reach a certain value, the influence of its lifting amount on the composite foundation will be reduced.

Study on Bearing Capacity and Failure Mode of Multi-Layer-Encased Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Column under Dynamic and Static Loading

The “method of overlap” replaces traditional welding to solve the problem of how the geosynthetic-encased stone column is limited by the welding frame during site construction, making the site construction simplified and economical, but its bearing mechanism is not clear. Therefore, the bearing mechanism and failure mode of the stone column was studied through the compression test of the multi-layer geosynthetic-encased stone column under dynamic and static loading. The research shows that the multi-layer encasement improves the modulus and lateral restraint of the stone column, which increases the stress transfer rate and reduces the damage degree of the stone column. The vertical ultimate bearing capacity increase in multi-layer geosynthetic-encased stone columns under dynamic and static loading is significantly different, and the difference can be up to 47.1%; the corresponding number of encasement layers should be selected according to the actual situation. The influence of the difference between dynamic and static loading on the location of the main radial strain of the stone column can be ignored, but the lateral restraint of the stone column under dynamic loading is weakened, the stress transfer rate is reduced, and the radial strain is reduced and more uniform along the stone column height. The vertical ultimate bearing capacity of the one- and two-layer geogrid-encased stone column under dynamic loading is lower than that of static loading. When treating soft foundations, the influence of traffic loads should be considered, and the bearing capacity of the geosynthetic-encased stone column should be appropriately increased in design value.

Contribution of geosynthetic to the shear strength of geosynthetic encased stone columns

This paper presents a numerical study to evaluate the contribution of geosynthetic to the shear strength of geosynthetic encased stone column (GESC) under direct shear loading conditions. The backfill soil was characterised using the linearly elastic–plastic Mohr–Coulomb model. The geosynthetic encasement was simulated using linearly elastic liner elements. The interaction between the geosynthetic encasement and soils on both sides was modelled through two interfaces. The three-dimensional numerical model was validated using experimental data from direct shear tests of GESC models. The shear stress–strain response and the development of longitudinal and circumferential strains of GESC during the shear process were first discussed, and then a parametric study was conducted to investigate the effects of various design parameters on the shear strength of GESC and the contribution of geosynthetic. Results indicate that the shear resistance provided by the geosynthetic encasement develops slowly, which depends on the mobilisation of tensile strains. At the failure condition, the longitudinal strains are larger than the circumferential strains, which indicates that the longitudinal tensile rupture is more critical for GESC under shear loading. The vertical stress, geosynthetic encasement stiffness and stone column diameter and spacing have the most important influences on the shear strength contribution of geosynthetic encasement.

Static and Dynamic Load Transfer Behaviors of the Composite Foundation Reinforced by the Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Column

An accurate description of the load transfer behaviors of the geosynthetic-encased stone column (GESC) is of great importance for revealing the bearing capacity of GESC. Static load tests and shake table model tests were performed to characterize the static and dynamic load transfer behaviors of the composite foundation reinforced by the GESC. Under static loading, static load tests were conducted on a fully geosynthetic-encased stone column (FGESC), partially geosynthetic-encased stone column (PGESC) and traditional stone column (TSC). The influence of length and stiffness of the encasement on the stone columns were investigated. Under seismic loading, the shake table model tests were performed to analyze the differences of the dynamic pile-soil stress responses between the composite foundations with the GESC and the TSC. The results show that the static pile-soil stress ratios of the composite foundation with the FGESC are about three to six times of those of the composite foundation with the TSC, and the difference increases with the increase in the stiffness or length of the encasement. The static vertical stress of 60% acting on the pile top can be transferred to the pile bottom for the FGESC, while only 27~45% for the TSC. The dynamic pile-soil stress ratios of the GESC and the TSC first decrease and then increase slightly with the increase of the input peak acceleration. The dynamic pile-soil stress ratio of the GESC is about three times that of the TSC under seismic excitation with the same type and peak acceleration. The attenuation rate of dynamic stress along the pile body under dynamic loading is much faster than that under the static loading. Under the static and dynamic conditions, the load transfer capacity and pile efficacy of the GESC are always better than those of the TSC.