[1] In the paper ‘‘Flow angle dependence of 1-m ionospheric plasma wave turbulence for near-threshold radar echo electric fields’’ by E. E. Timofeev, M. K. Vallinkoski, P. Pollari, J. Kangas, T. Virdi, P. J. S. Williams, and E. Nielsen (Journal of Geophysical Research, 107(A10), 1286, doi:10.1029/2000JA005023, 2002), several errors appeared in the text. [2] The authors’ affiliations were not set correctly. The correct affiliations for each author are as follows: E. E. Timofeev V. A. Fock Institute of Physics, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia M. K. Vallinkoski Sodankyla Geophysical Observatory, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland P. Pollari Department of Physics, University of Oulu, Finland Now at Computer Services Center, University of Oulu, Finland J. Kangas Department of Physics, University of Oulu, Finland Now at Sodankyla Geophysical Observatory, Sodankyla, Finland T. Virdi Department of Physics, University of Aberystwyth, UK P. J. S. Williams Department of Physics, University of Aberystwyth, UK E. Nielsen Max-Planck-Institut fur Aeronomie, Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany [3] The correct complete address for P. Pollari is Computer Services Centre, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 7600, Oulu, FIN-90014, Finland (paivio.pollari@oulu.fi). [4] The captions for Figures 8 and 9 were incorrect. The correct captions for Figures 8 and 9 are as follows: Figure 8. The near-threshold STARE radar echo Doppler shifts versus the ionospheric electric field strength. Figure 9. The near-threshold STARE radar echo Doppler shifts versus the EISCAT plasma velocity component along the STARE radar line of sight. [5] The first sentence of paragraph 16 should read as follows: The special ERRRIS (E-region Rocket and Radar InstabilityStudy)campaign inthe twospringseasonsin1988– 1989 gives enough STARE andEISCATdata to study the 1-m ionospheric plasma wave turbulence for practically all possible flow angles within the eastward and westward electrojets. [6] The first sentence in paragraph 20 should read as follows: The experimental setup in the ERRRIS campaign intervals includes the STARE radars and the EISCAT facility, which allowed simultaneous coherent and incoherent scatter measurements along the geomagnetic flux tube intersected by the two STARE beams in the E-region over Tromso. [7] The last sentence in paragraph 62 should read as follows: According to Table 3, the ratio of jet averaged currents is between 1.6 and 1.8 for the D models, whereas for model C the ratio is about 1.5. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 107, NO. A12, 1450, doi:10.1029/2002JA009771, 2002
Read full abstract