Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation Research Articles

Retraction: Comparison of the efficacy of genicular nerve phenol neurolysis and radiofrequency ablation for pain management in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Retraction: Comparison of the efficacy of genicular nerve phenol neurolysis and radiofrequency ablation for pain management in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation practice patterns: A survey study of the International Pain and Spine Interventional Society

IntroductionChronic knee pain often results from degenerative conditions such as knee osteoarthritis (OA) and can worsen after surgical interventions like total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Knee OA affects approximately 86 million individuals globally, leading to decreased function, mobility limitations, and disability. While TKA is a common surgical treatment for refractory knee OA, though up to 20 % of patients experience chronic post-operative knee pain worse than their pre-operative pain. Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GnRFA) has emerged as a promising intervention for knee OA pain unresponsive to conservative management and for chronic post-TKA pain. GnRFA is an evidence-based technique supported by multiple prospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, practice patterns and GnRFA techniques vary, and no peer-reviewed publication has yet quantified these variations in real-world clinical practice. ObjectiveThis study aims to understand the practice patterns of interventional pain physicians regarding patient selection, use of prognostic blocks, imaging, nerve targets, GnRFA types, and GnRFA techniques in treating knee pain secondary to OA or persistent post-TKA pain. MethodsAn anonymous 29-question survey was distributed via electronic mail to members of the International Pain and Spine Intervention Society (IPSIS) from January 16, 2024, to February 29, 2024. The survey assessed practice patterns related to patient selection, prognostic block use, and GnRFA techniques. Data were collected and stored using REDCap software, with descriptive statistics calculated. ResultsA total of 150 completed surveys were analyzed, representing a completion rate of 2.0 % of surveys sent, 3.5 % of emails opened, and 56.8 % of those who clicked on the survey link. Respondents generally use common selection protocols regarding OA grade (Kelgren-Lawrence 3 and 4), duration of failed conservative care (3–6 months), a single anesthetic block paradigm, and use of fluoroscopic guidance for the GnRFA procedure. More variability was reported between respondents regarding the volume of anesthetic used during prognostic blocks, the threshold to consider a prognostic block “positive,” the technology used, and nerves targeted during the GnRFA procedure. ConclusionThe study provides valuable insights into the current practice patterns of GnRFA among interventional pain physicians. While there is consensus on some aspects of patient selection and procedural techniques, significant variability exists in prognostic block protocols and nerve targets for GnRFA. These findings highlight the need for further research to explore the long-term efficacy and safety of GnRFA and to standardize techniques and protocols across different practice settings, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life. The low response rate may limit generalizability, and the survey did not include data on active tip sizes used for ablation or whether other procedures should be exhausted before resorting to GnRFA. Additionally, a survey to IPSIS membership only may not fully represent a diverse cohort of pain management specialists, potentially introducing sampling bias. Future studies should include members from a broader range of professional organizations to enhance representativeness.

Effect of radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves on the isokinetic muscle strength of knee joint in patients with osteoarthritis knee: A randomized double-blind sham controlled clinical trial.

This randomised controlled trial evaluated the effect of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of genicular nerve on muscle strength in osteoarthritis knee patients with chronic pain. Fifty-four patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis, experiencing significant pain (VNRS > 50) and moderate to severe disease (KL grade ≥ 2) were enrolled. Group 1 received RFA of genicular nerves of the affected knee while Group 2 received a sham procedure. The primary outcome was change in knee muscle strength evaluated using isokinetic peak torque(IPT) using IsoforceTM isokinetic dynamometer at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included changes in pain scores, function, perceived effect of the treatment and compliance to physiotherapy. At 3 months, significant difference was observed between IPT of flexor muscle at 60 and 180 degrees between the treatment and the Sham control (p-value = 0.01). No significant difference was observed in the extensor muscle strength. Within-group analysis revealed a significant increase in the IPT values for both extension and flexion at 60 and 180 degrees/sec evident across various time intervals. Group1 consistently reported lower VNRS scores at all time points. WOMAC scores of both groups were significantly different at all timepoints, with higher scores indicating reduced functionality in Group2. The GPE and compliance to physiotherapy were higher in Group1 patients at all times of follow up albeit decreasing trend in later periods. Application of RFA to genicular nerves in chronic OA knee patients resulted in better pain relief, improved functionality and increased muscle strength at extension and flexion at 3 months follow-up.

Long term effect of ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves in chronic knee osteoarthritis

Long term effect of ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves in chronic knee osteoarthritis

Effectiveness of the Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of Genicular Nerves in Patients with Chronic Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Study.

Background: Increasing evidence supporting the clinical effectiveness of cooled radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy for genicular nerves in patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis (OA) exists. However, no study has been conducted to eliminate the potential influence of a placebo effect associated with this procedure. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of cooled RFA compared with a sham procedure in patients with painful knees due to OA. Methods: In this double-blind, randomized, controlled study, participants were randomly assigned to receive cooled RFA of the knee (cooled RFA group, n = 20) or a sham procedure (sham group, n = 20). The primary outcome was the proportion of successful responders at the three-month follow-up. The secondary outcomes were successful responders at one and six months; pain intensity of the knee; functional status; medication; and satisfaction at one, three, and six months after the procedures. Results: For the primary outcome, the successful responder rate was significantly higher in the cooled RFA group (76.5%) than in the sham group (33.3%) (p = 0.018). For the secondary outcome, more successful responders were observed in the cooled RFA group than in the sham group at one and six months after the procedure (p = 0.041 and 0.007, respectively). The decreased knee pain intensity was maintained throughout the six-month follow-up period in the cooled RFA group. No differences were observed in functional status, medication change, or satisfaction in both groups. Conclusions: The cooled RFA of genicular nerves offers significant pain relief and surpasses the effects attributable to a placebo.

Medial and Lateral Burns With Concomitant Infection After Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation: A Case Report

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis management might include medication, intraarticular injections, physical therapy, and surgical intervention. Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective therapy for patients who do not receive benefit from conservative medical management and are not surgical candidates (secondary to medical comorbidity, patient preference, and other factors). Genicular nerve RFA is generally safe and has a low complication rate. However, there have been case reports of minor and major complications after RFA. We report a case of burns after genicular nerve RFA. CASE REPORT: A 49-year-old man (92 kg; body mass index [kg/m2] 28.3), with a history of coronary artery disease and chronic tobacco use, presented with 20 years of chronic knee pain. He previously had short-term relief with an intraarticular steroid knee injection. He was found to be a suitable candidate for genicular nerve RFA and underwent the procedure successfully without any immediate complications. His pain decreased from 9/10 before the procedure to 5/10 after his RFA. On postprocedure day 33, a 1 cm circular lesion with drainage was noted on the medial aspect of his knee. A lateral lesion was discovered at a subsequent follow-up appointment. He was treated with antibiotics, chlorhexidine cleansing, and dressing changes which resolved the lesions without any long-term sequelae. CONCLUSION: Our case represents an instance of full thickness skin burns with concomitant infection post genicular RFA, uniquely in both the medial and lateral sites. Our patient’s risk factors of low body mass index, smoking, and vascular disease may have led to a delayed healing response. In addition, needle depth may also have contributed to his injury. Ensuring adequate needle depth and patient selection can minimize these complications. KEY WORDS: Radiofrequency ablation, knee pain, osteoarthritis, chronic pain, genicular nerve, RFA, adverse event, complication

Ultrasound-guided thermal radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves after total knee replacement

The rate of refractory chronic pain after total knee replacement (TKR) is 20–25%, with no identifiable etiology in 6% of cases. Without an etiologic diagnosis, the surgeon is unlikely to consider revision, but pain poses a therapeutic challenge for achieving satisfaction and an acceptable quality of life. Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) was recently developed as a non-drug analgesic option. It is minimally invasive and safe, with few adverse effects, opening a new perspective for management of refractory chronic pain after TKR. Level of evidenceIV.

Complications and opioid-prescribing patterns following genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation versus intra-articular injection: a matched cohort study.

Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) is an emerging procedure used to relieve pain from severe knee osteoarthritis. While there have been rare reports of significant complications, their incidence has not been well established. The objective of this study was to examine complication rates at 30 and 90 days post treatment as well as characterize opioid-prescribing patterns before and after treatment. A large national database was queried to identify patients undergoing GNRFA from 2015 to 2022 and matched to control cohorts composed of patients receiving either intra-articular corticosteroid (CSI) or hyaluronic acid injection (HAI) of the knee. Complication rates at 30 and 90 days were analyzed. Opioid utilization was assessed in the 6 months before and after treatment. Rates of infection (0.1%, CI 0.02% to 0.5% vs 0.2%, CI 0.05% to 0.6%), septic arthritis (<0.1%, CI 0.003% to 0.4% vs 0.1%, CI 0.02% to 0.5%), deep vein thrombosis (2.0%, CI 1.3% to 2.7% vs 1.6%, CI 1.0% to 2.2%), pulmonary embolism (1.2%, CI 0.6% to 1.7% vs 1.3%, CI 1.1% to 2.5%), bleeding (<0.1%, CI 0.003% to 0.4% vs 0%, CI 0% to 0.3%), seroma (<0.1%, CI 0.003% to 0.4% vs 0.2%, CI 0.05% to 0.6%), nerve injury (0%, CI 0% to 0.3% vs 0%, CI 0% to 0.3%) and thermal injury (0%, CI 0% to 0.3% vs 0%, CI 0% to 0.3%) were not different between CSI and GNRFA cohorts at 30 days. Rate of swelling was significantly greater in the GNRFA cohort (9.4%, CI 7.6% to 10.4% vs 6.4%, CI 4.8% to 7.2%, p=0.003) at 30 days. At 90 days, rates of septic arthritis (0.1%, CI 0.02% to 0.5% vs 0.3%, CI 0.08% to 0.7%), deep vein thrombosis (3.1%, CI 2.1% to 3.8% vs 3.1%, CI 2.2% to 3.9%), pulmonary embolism (1.5%, CI 0.9% to 2.1% vs 1.8%, CI 1.2% to 2.5%), and nerve injury (0%, CI 0% to 0.3% vs <0.1%, CI 0.003% to 0.4%) were not significantly different.Between HAI versus GNRFA cohorts, no significant differences were seen in rates of infection (0.3%, CI 0.08% to 0.07% vs 0.7%, CI 0.3% to 1.2%), septic arthritis (0.2%, CI 0.05% to 0.6% vs 0.4%, CI 0.2% to 0.9%), deep vein thrombosis (2.0%, CI 1.3% to 2.7% vs 1.9%, CI 1.2% to 2.7%), pulmonary embolism (1.5%, CI 0.9% to 2.2% vs 1.7%, CI 1.1% to 2.5%), bleeding (0.1%, CI 0.02% to 0.5% vs 0.2%, CI 0.05% to 0.6%), seroma (<0.1%, CI 0.03% to 0.4% vs 0%, CI 0% to 0.3%), nerve injury (0%, CI 0% to 0.3% vs 0%, CI 0% to 0.3%), swelling (14.0%, CI 11.6% to 15.1% vs 12.0%, CI 10.3% to 13.6%), and thermal injury (<0.1%, CI 0.03% to 0.4% vs <0.01%, CI 0.3% to 0.4%) at 30 days. Rates of infection (0.7%, CI 0.3% to 1.2% vs 1.4%, CI 0.9% to 2.1%), septic arthritis (0.3%, CI 0.1% to 0.8% vs 0.5%, CI 0.2% to 1.1%), deep vein thrombosis (3.6%, CI 2.6% to 4.4% vs 3.1%, CI 2.2% to 4.0%), pulmonary embolism (2.3%, CI 1.5% to 3.0% vs 2.1%, CI 1.4% to 3.0%) and nerve injury (0%, CI 0% to 0.3% vs 0.1%, CI 0.02% to 0.5%) were not significantly different at 90 days.There were no significant differences in level of pretreatment opioid utilization although overall consumption in mean daily morphine equivalents was greater in the GNRFA cohort. Opioid utilization significantly increased in the first 30 days after ablation in patients with no prior opioid use compared to controls. In patients with some and chronic prior opioid use, opioid requirements were generally decreased in all treatment groups at 6 months with no clearly superior treatment in reducing opioid consumption. Our study demonstrated that GNRFA possesses a safety profile similar to that of intra-articular injections although significant adverse events such as venous thromboembolism and septic arthritis may occur rarely. Although opioid utilization generally increased in the 30 days after ablation compared with intra-articular injection, similar reduction in opioid consumption at 6 months was seen in patients with prior opioid use in the ablation and control cohorts.

How I do it: implementing virtual reality for genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation

How I do it: implementing virtual reality for genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation

Bipolar radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves in chronic knee pain: A novel technique for more complete sensory denervation.

Monopolar radiofrequency ablation (MRFA) of the genicular nerves has been considered the main interventional treatment for chronic knee pain. However, the variable locations of these nerves could suggest that traditional MRFA of genicular nerves may be insufficient to cover the area needed to provide complete sensory denervation. For these reasons, some alternatives have been proposed to achieve an increase in the lesion area that offers better outcomes such a bipolar radiofrequency ablation (BRFA). To describe the efficacy and safety of the bipolar radiofrequency ablation (BRFA) of the genicular nerves in the patients with chronic knee pain. A retrospective study was conducted in the Pain Medicine Department. Institutional review board approval from the Hospital Ethical Committee and informed consent were obtained. We reviewed our database for BRFA of genicular nerves from January 2018 to December 2021 for patients with chronic knee pain. The cannulas were placed using ultrasound guidance (10cm, 22-gauge and 10mm active curved tip), and each pair of cannulas were subjected to BRFA for 90 seconds at 80∘C. Data analysis was conducted using T-test for paired variables (Visual analogue scale and EuroQol, an instrument intended to complement other forms of quality-of-life measures). Twenty-five patients met inclusion criteria after excluding 7 based on the study design. The mean improvement of our patients according to the VAS was -3.98 (95%CI: -4.37 to -3.59) p< 0.0001 and EuroQol +0.416 (95%CI: 0.364 to 0.468) p< 0.0001. The mean duration of improvement was 8 (6-11) months after BRFA. There were no reported serious adverse events related to the procedure, only local pain for 24 to 48 hours in 3 patients. We can conclude that BRFA reduces procedural pain and increases the treatment area, providing more complete sensory denervation and improved clinical outcomes.

Cooled radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves for knee osteoarthritis.

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent and debilitating musculoskeletal condition that significantly affects the quality of life of millions of individuals worldwide. In recent years, cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) has become a viable treatment option for knee OA. This review thoroughly evaluated the existing literature on CRFA therapy for knee OA. It delved into the mechanisms behind CRFA, evaluated its clinical efficacy, and investigated potential avenues for future research and application. The insights gained from this review are crucial for healthcare professionals, researchers, and policymakers, offering an updated perspective on CRFA's role as a viable therapeutic option for knee OA.

Can ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves of the knee, be performed without locating corresponding arterial pulsations—a cadaveric study

IntroductionGiven the rising prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves (RFA) has emerged as a promising treatment option for knee pain. The knee has an extremely complex and variable innervation with nearly 13 genicular nerves described. The frequently ablated genicular nerves are the superomedial (SMGN), the superolateral (SLGN), and the inferomedial (IMGN) genicular nerves. Conventionally, under ultrasound guidance, these nerves are ablated near the corresponding arterial pulsations, but due to the rich vascular anastomosis around the knee joint, identifying the arteries corresponding to these constant genicular nerves can be tedious unless guided by some bony landmarks. In this study, we have evaluated whether it is possible to accurately target these three genicular nerves by just locating bony landmarks under ultrasound in human cadaveric knee specimens.MethodsFifteen formalin-fixed cadaveric knee specimens were studied. SMGN was targeted 1 cm anterior to the adductor tubercle in the axial view. For SLGN, in the coronal view, the junction of the lateral femoral condyle and shaft was identified, and at the same level in the axial view, the crest between the lateral and posterior femoral cortex was targeted. For IMGN in the coronal view, the midpoint between the most prominent part of the medial tibial condyle and the insertion of the deep fibers of the medial collateral ligament was marked. The medial end of the medial tibial cortex was then targeted at the same level in the axial view. The needle was inserted from anterior to posterior, with an in-plane approach for all nerves. Eosin, 2% W/V, in 0.1 ml was injected. Microdissection was done while keeping the needle in situ. Staining of the nerve was considered a positive outcome, and the percentage was calculated. The nerve-to-needle distance was measured, and the mean with an interquartile range was calculated.ResultThe accuracies of ultrasound-guided bony landmarks of SMGN, SLGN, and IMGN were 100% in terms of staining, with average nerve-to-needle distances of 1.67, 3.2, and 1.8 mm respectively.ConclusionIt is with 100% accuracy, that we can perform RFA of SMGN, SLGN, and IMGN under ultrasound guidance, by locating the aforementioned bony landmarks.

Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation Before and After Magnetic Resonance Imaging Anatomical Mapping: Case Study

Background: Chronic knee pain is a significant cause of morbidity for which radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of genicular nerves (GN) may be considered. However, treatment effectiveness depends on accurate placement of RFA probes, and there remains uncertainty on GN anatomical location. Case Report: A 21-year-old man presented with 2 months of severe knee pain following a canoe trip. Hoffa’s fat impingement was diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and a subsequent fat pad injection was unsuccessful. After GN blocks, RFA provided 90% relief for 4 weeks. At this time, RFA was performed with probe placement determined by the patient’s MRI-mapped GN neurovascular bundle location. At 8 weeks, the patient continues to have 100% left knee pain relief. Conclusion: This case suggests that MRI-mapped GNs may assist in planning genicular RFA to improve probe and nerve apposition. Key words: Genicular nerve, magnetic resonance imaging, radiofrequency ablation

Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of chronic knee joint pain: a real-world cohort study with evaluation of prognostic factors.

Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) is an effective treatment for chronic knee pain. However, there has been minimal investigation of real-world, long-term outcomes and factors that predict treatment success after GNRFA. To evaluate the effectiveness of GNRFA for chronic knee pain in a real-world population and identify predictive factors. Consecutive patients who underwent GNRFA at a tertiary academic center were identified. Demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics were collected from the medical record. Outcome data were numeric rating scale (NRS) pain reduction and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Data were collected by standardized telephone survey. Predictors of success were evaluated with logistic and Poisson regression analyses. Of the 226 total patients identified, 134 (65.6 ± 12.7; 59.7% female) were successfully contacted and analyzed, with a mean follow-up time of 23.3 ± 11.0 months. Of those, 47.8% (n = 64; 95%CI: 39.5%-56.2%) and 61.2% (n = 82; 95%CI: 52.7%-69.0%) reported ≥50% NRS score reduction and ≥2-point NRS score reduction, respectively, and 59.0% (n = 79; 95%CI: 50.5%-66.9%) reported "much improved" on the PGIC questionnaire. Factors associated with a greater likelihood of treatment success (P < .05) were higher Kellgren-Lawrence osteoarthritis grade (2-4 vs 0-1); no baseline opioid, antidepressant, or anxiolytic medication use; and >3 nerves targeted. In this real-world cohort, approximately half of the participants experienced clinically meaningful improvements in knee pain after GNRFA at an average follow-up time of nearly 2 years. Factors associated with higher likelihood of treatment success were more advanced osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2-4); no opioid, antidepressant, or anxiolytic medication use; and >3 nerves targeted.

Long-term Efficacy of Genicular Nerve Ablation for Chronic Osteoarthritic Knee Pain: A Prospective Observational Longitudinal Study

Objective: When patients with chronic osteoarthritis (OA) knee pain do not respond to conservative treatment and are not suitable for knee arthroplasty, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the genicular nerve is probably an alternative treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of genicular nerve ablation in severe osteoarthritic knee pain patients. Materials and Methods: Patients with severe chronic OA knee pain were recruited and performed a genicular nerve block (GNB). The patients’ demographic data, numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest and on movement, Thai Oxford knee score (Thai OKS), Thai knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score physical function short form (Thai KOOS-PS), timed up and go test, brief pain inventory, fall evaluation, and EuroQol 5D-5L were recorded. For the positive block patients (≥50% pain relief for 24 hours), genicular nerve RFA was performed under fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance. All patients were followed up at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th months. Results: 21 patients were included in the study, but only 17 were completely followed up for 12 months. At the 12th month, genicular nerve RFA reduced the mean NRS on movement from 7.9±1.6 to 4.0±2.6 (p=0.005), improved knee function (Thai OKS from 18.8±5.3 to 28.5±10.1; p=0.006), but did not significantly improve quality of life (EuroQol-5D-5L from 0.43±0.20 to 0.69±0.33; p=0.130). No adverse events were observed. Conclusion: Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation in severe chronic OA knee patients demonstrated significant pain relief and functional improvement for up to 12 months without serious adverse events.

The safety and efficacy of genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for pain in inferolateral quadrant of the knee

BackgroundGenicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective procedure to alleviate knee pain. This procedure has been proven to be safe, except in the inferior lateral quadrant (ILQ) due to its innervation being near the common fibular nerve (CFN). Given the complexity of this approach, pain physicians do not routinely perform RFA in the ILQ, leading to inadequate pain relief in this region. MethodsThis is a retrospective study of 54 patients who had undergone genicular nerve RFA. Thirty patients had genicular nerve RFA of the knee joint including the ILQ innervated by the inferolateral genicular and recurrent fibular nerves, while 24 patients had RFA of the knee joint without involvement of the ILQ. We compared the outcomes (pain relief, function, and complications) in the patients with and without ILQ RFA at 3 months and 6 months after RFA. ResultsThere was no significant difference in initial pain and functional level before RFA between these two groups. After RFA, the two groups had comparable pain relief at 3 months (p ​= ​0.06) and 6 months (p ​= ​0.20), and similar functionality at 3 months (p ​= ​0.29) and 6 months (p ​= ​0.12). There were no reported complications after RFA with or without ILQ RFA. ConclusionsRFA of the innervation to the ILQ of the knee is as safe and effective as all other anterior quadrants.

A randomized controlled study of the long-term efficacy of cooled and monopolar radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of chronic pain related to knee osteoarthritis

BackgroundChronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) is expected to become more prevalent. Although conventional therapies may provide relief they are not long-lasting. Persistent pain may lead to total knee replacement, which is not free of adverse outcomes. Monopolar and cooled radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of genicular nerves is an effective option. However, either method may provide distinctive results depending on expected lesion size, a key aspect considering the anatomical variability of knee innervations. This prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and durability of knee RFA using a cooled probe or a monopolar probe of comparable diameter. MethodsThis investigator-initiated, post-market, double-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial was approved by the Western IRB. 79 subjects with chronic knee pain due to knee OA were enrolled in multiple locations of a single center. 75 subjects were randomized (1:1) into RFA treatment with either a 4 ​mm/17G cooled active tip (CRFA) or a 10 ​mm/16G monopolar active tip (MRFA) using conventional procedures. Primary endpoint was change in knee pain level (100 ​mm VAS score) from baseline at 24-week post-treatment. Other endpoints include change in functionality, global perceived effect, and frequency of adverse events. Evaluation spanned to 52-week post-treatment. Significance of results (p ​< ​0.05) was calculated using standard statistical analyses. ResultsBoth CRFA and MRFA provided significant reduction (41 ​mm and 39 ​mm, respectively) of chronic knee pain at 24-week. At the 52-week visit, reduction in pain level was sustained for CRFA (42 ​mm) but seems to decrease for MRFA (31 ​mm). Improvements in functionality were also significant and sustained with both treatments, although tend to decrease with MRFA at 52-week. Most patients also perceived a very good/good effect of treatments along the duration of the study. ConclusionRFA of knee genicular nerves for the treatment of OA chronic pain is effective for 52 weeks post-ablation when using a CRFA (4 ​mm/17G active tip) or MRFA (10 ​mm/16G active tip). The benefits of CRFA seems to be better sustained beyond 24 weeks than the ones of MRFA, although no significant differences were observed at 52 weeks.

Abstract No. 120 Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation: Is There a Predictor of Outcomes?

Abstract No. 120 Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation: Is There a Predictor of Outcomes?

The Role of Genicular Radiofrequency Ablation in the Management of Persistent Pain after Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Persistent pain is one of the most frequent complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and can be devastating for the patient's quality of life. The use of genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) is prevalent regarding non-surgical treatment of knee osteoarthritis. However, it is controversial when employed for the management of residual pain after TKA. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of GNRFA for the treatment of post-TKA chronic pain and to assess the potential benefits of its use. Twelve patients sustaining chronic pain after TKA underwent GNRFA treatment. The intervention included the superior medial genicular nerve, the superior lateral genicular nerve and the inferior medial genicular nerve. Visual analog scale (VAS) system was utilized for pain assessment at 1-week, 6-month, and 1-year follow-ups. Patients experiencing chronic knee pain derived from other or unspecified causes were excluded. Mean VAS score before the treatment was 8.3, while it ended up 2.3, 5.7, and 7.9 at the 1-week, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up, respectively. Some patients reported residual pain that they regarded more bearable than before the procedure at the 1-week evaluation, with no significant alterations in the 6-month reassessment. In 2 cases results at the 1-week follow-up were dissatisfying, however, this aided us in distinguishing the cause of the persistent pain. We were not able to conclude that GNRFA used for the treatment of chronic pain after TKA is as efficacious as in knee osteoarthritis pain. However, in some cases, it proved to be beneficial regarding discerning the etiology of the pain.

Cooled and traditional thermal radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves in patients with chronic knee pain: a comparative outcomes analysis

IntroductionGenicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) is a minimally invasive intervention for patients with chronic knee pain (CKP) not responding to conservative treatments. Few investigations have compared treatment outcomes of cooled-RFA...