Genetic Studies Of Bipolar Disorder Research Articles

Progress and Implications from Genetic Studies of Bipolar Disorder.

With the advancements in gene sequencing technologies, including genome-wide association studies, polygenetic risk scores, and high-throughput sequencing, there has been a tremendous advantage in mapping a detailed blueprint for the genetic model of bipolar disorder (BD). To date, intriguing genetic clues have been identified to explain the development of BD, as well as the genetic association that might be applied for the development of susceptibility prediction and pharmacogenetic intervention. Risk genes of BD, such as CACNA1C, ANK3, TRANK1, and CLOCK, have been found to be involved in various pathophysiological processes correlated with BD. Although the specific roles of these genes have yet to be determined, genetic research on BD will help improve the prevention, therapeutics, and prognosis in clinical practice. The latest preclinical and clinical studies, and reviews of the genetics of BD, are analyzed in this review, aiming to summarize the progress in this intriguing field and to provide perspectives for individualized, precise, and effective clinical practice.

Familial traits of bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Genetic studies of bipolar disorder (BD) have shown varied results, which is in part because of the heterogeneity of the disorder. Identifying clinical phenotypes of BD could reduce variability and benefit research. Since BD has a robust genetic component, studies can investigate clinical traits that cluster in families to identify phenotypes with a probable genetic basis. We conducted a systematic review of the current literature on familial clinical traits of BD. Text screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers, and random effects meta-analysis was used. Of 1117 unique records, 16 studies met inclusion criteria. These studies indicated 14 potentially familial traits of BD: age of onset (OR: 4.50; 95% CI: [3.25, 6.22]), bipolar type (OR: 2.05 [1.50, 2.79]), lithium response (OR: 3.71 [1.28, 10.82]), polarity at onset (OR: 1.17 [1.03, 1.34]), psychotic features (OR: 2.20 [1.51, 3.20]), mood-incongruent psychosis (OR: 2.52 [1.66, 3.83]), puerperal psychosis (OR: 6.54 [2.55, 16.77]), rapid cycling (OR: 4.95 [0.96, 25.40]), suicide attempt (OR: 1.04 [0.65, 1.67]), alcoholism (OR: 1.53 [1.09, 2.16]), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OR: 3.10 [1.31; 7.09]), panic disorder (OR: 2.69 [1.12; 6.48]), social anxiety disorder (OR: 1.00 [0.39, 2.55]), and specific phobia (OR: 1.94 [0.95; 3.96]). For most traits, tests of heterogeneity were significant and publication bias was likely. The results of our review and meta-analysis highlight the lack of studies investigating familial clinical traits of BD, despite the need to address heterogeneity. The large degree of variability between studies must be reduced for future research.

Genetic substrates of bipolar disorder risk in Latino families.

Genetic studies of bipolar disorder (BP) have been conducted in the Latin American population, to date, in several countries, including Mexico, the United States, Costa Rica, Colombia, and, to a lesser extent, Brazil. These studies focused primarily on linkage-based designs utilizing families with multiplex cases of BP. Significant BP loci were identified on Chromosomes 18, 5 and 8, and fine mapping suggested several genes of interest underlying these linkage peaks. More recently, studies in these same pedigrees yielded significant linkage loci for BP endophenotypes, including measures of activity, sleep cycles, and personality traits. Building from findings in other populations, candidate gene association analyses in Latinos from Mexican and Central American ancestry confirmed the role of several genes (including CACNA1C and ANK3) in conferring BP risk. Although GWAS, methylation, and deep sequencing studies have only begun in these populations, there is evidence that CNVs and rare SNPs both play a role in BP risk of these populations. Large segments of the Latino populations in the Americas remain largely unstudied regarding BP genetics, but evidence to date has shown that this type of research can be successfully conducted in these populations and that the genetic underpinnings of BP in these cohorts share at least some characteristics with risk genes identified in European and other populations.

De novo variation in bipolar disorder.

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a common, highly heritable disorder that affects 1-2% of the world's population. To date, most genetic studies of BD have focused on common gene variation, and while robustly associated loci have been identified, a substantial proportion of the heritability remains missing and could be partially attributable to rare variation. In this study, we apply a de novo paradigm in BD to identify newly arisen variants that have yet to undergo natural selection and may represent highly pathogenic variants. We performed whole genome sequencing of 97 trios of Ashkenazi Jewish descent, selecting "simplex" families with no family history of BD and an early age of onset. We found a total of 6882 de novo variants (an average of 70.9 ± 12.9 S.D. variants per trio), including 107 variants within protein-coding genes. We combined our exonic variations with the results of 79 previously published BD trios, identifying 20 loss-of-function (LoF) and 77 missense damaging de novo variants in BD. These variants showed significant enrichment for constrained genes and for genes located to the postsynaptic density (PSD) (all Bonferroni corrected p < 0.05). Pathway analyses showed enrichment in several pathways, including "Phosphoinositides (PI) and their downstream targets" (Bonferroni p = 4.2 × 10-6), a pathway prominently featured in lithium's hypothesized mechanism of action. In addition, while we found overall evidence for transmission of common variant polygenic risk of BD in our full sample (pTDT p = 2.21 × 10-4), specific trios with LoF variants showed no evidence of polygenic transmission. In sum, our findings support the de novo paradigm as a contributor to the genetic architecture of BD and provide evidence that constrained genes, as well as genes within the PSD and PI pathway harbor rare variation associated with BD.

Thought Disorder in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder Probands, Their Relatives, and Nonpsychiatric Controls.

Thought disorder (TD) has long been associated with schizophrenia (SZ) and is now widely recognized as a symptom of mania and other psychotic disorders as well. Previous studies have suggested that the TD found in the clinically unaffected relatives of SZ, schizoaffective and bipolar probands is qualitatively similar to that found in the probands themselves. Here, we examine which quantitative measures of TD optimize the distinction between patients with diagnoses of SZ and bipolar disorder with psychotic features (BP) from nonpsychiatric controls (NC) and from each other. In addition, we investigate whether these same TD measures also distinguish their respective clinically unaffected relatives (RelSZ, RelBP) from controls as well as from each other. We find that deviant verbalizations are significantly associated with SZ and are co-familial in clinically unaffected RelSZ, but are dissociated from, and are not co-familial for, BP disorder. In contrast, combinatory thinking was nonspecifically associated with psychosis, but did not aggregate in either group of relatives. These results provide further support for the usefulness of TD for identifying potential non-penetrant carriers of SZ-risk genes, in turn enhancing the power of genetic analyses. These findings also suggest that further refinement of the TD phenotype may be needed in order to be suitable for use in genetic studies of bipolar disorder.

Genome-Wide Association Study of Temperament in Bipolar Disorder Reveals Significant Associations with Three Novel Loci

The many attempts to identify genes for bipolar disorder (BD) have met with limited success, which has generally been attributed to genetic heterogeneity and small gene effects. However, it is also possible that the categorical phenotypes used in genetic studies of BD are not the most informative or biologically relevant. Although quantitative phenotypes provide an alternative to categorical phenotypes based on diagnosis, they have not been fully exploited in BD genetics due to the lack of accessible biological measures. We have explored aspects of temperament as quantitative phenotypes that might define subtypes of BD with different clinical features and courses of illness. Temperament is a heritable personality factor that establishes the baseline level of reactivity, mood, and energy of a person. We have performed a genome-wide association study with genotype data from the Bipolar Genome Study and 1263 bipolar subjects that had completed the Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and San Diego Autoquestionnaire (TEMPS-A). The TEMPS-A is designed to assess lifelong, milder aspects of bipolar symptomatology and defines five temperaments: hyperthymic, dysthymic, cyclothymic, irritable, and anxious. The irritable temperament produced the most significant result with a genome-wide significant p value of 1.7 × 10(-8) on chromosome 1. The hyperthymic temperament produced additional genome-wide significant p values of 4.1 × 10(-8) and 2.1 × 10(-8) on chromosomes 12 and 22, respectively. These results suggest that aspects of temperament might define subtypes of BD that are more clinically and genetically homogenous, which might aid in the identification of predisposing genetic variants.

Principal domains of quantitative anxiety trait in subjects with lifetime history of mania

High comorbidity rates for anxiety have been documented in subjects with history of mania or hypomania. We explored the presence of latent constructs of quantitative anxiety in subjects who have a history of mania or hypomania. We conducted an exploratory factor analysis of anxiety trait in 212 subjects who have a lifetime history of at least one manic/hypomanic syndrome. Participants were originally recruited for a Costa Rican sibling pair genetic study of Bipolar Disorder. We used principal factors extraction method with squared multiple correlations (SAS/SAT Professional software) of the STAI (trait subscale). A three-factor solution with a good simple structure and statistical adequacy was obtained with a KMO of 0.84 (>0.6) and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity of 2.4668E-162 (p<0.05). Items were grouped into anxiety-absent factor and the anxiety-present symptoms in two additional factors based on the nature of the symptoms, worry and rumination. Comorbid disorders could affect the interaction of anxiety score with manic/hypomanic symptoms. Some statistical parameters (mood status independence, score distribution and correlation between trait score and quantitative mania/hypomania) were not taken into consideration to extract the factors. Because anxiety dimensions were explored on individuals with history of mania or hypomania and not in healthy subjects, comparison of our results with other studies can draw confusing conclusions. Two underlying constructs, worry and rumination may explain anxiety sub-syndromic symptoms in Costa Rican patients with history of mania or hypomania.

Ethnic disparities in the perception of ethical risks from psychiatric genetic studies

To examine if ethnic differences in concerns about unfavorable consequences from psychiatric genetic studies, existing between non-Hispanic Black and White populations, persist among participants in an actual genetic study of bipolar disorder. Historically, minority subjects have been less willing to participate in such studies. Participants in the US Bipolar Genome Study (BIGS) were assessed on six items of concerns in the Questionnaire on Genetic Risk (QGR). Each item had five response categories, ranging from "not at all" concerned to "very concerned." Responses from Black (N = 188) and White participants (N = 1,065) formed the base for this analysis. Concerns about unfavorable consequences of conducting psychiatric genetic studies were prevalent in the whole sample. Concern for medical insurance was most prevalent (63.4%), followed by job concern (58.8%) and stigma (57.4%). Racial discrimination was less prevalent (28.1%). Blacks endorsed significantly stronger concerns for all consequences except the medical insurance item (P < 0.008). The most significant ethnic disparity in concerns was for racial discrimination (P < 0.0001). Associations between levels of concern and ethnicity remained significant after adjustments for other factors in multivariate models. Ethnic differences (Blacks vs. Whites) in perceived concerns about unfavorable consequences from participation persist among participants in an actual psychiatric genetic study. This suggests that other factors may play a more critical role in the decision not to participate. Future studies should investigate more comprehensive sources of barriers to consenting for ongoing psychiatric genetic studies in representative samples, incorporating assessments from non-participants as well as participants.

Database of genetic studies of bipolar disorder

This study describes the construction and preliminary analysis of a database of summary level genetic findings for bipolar disorder from the literature. The database is available for noncommercial use at http://bioprogramming.bsd.uchicago.edu/BDStudies/. This may be the first complete collection of published gene-specific linkage and association findings on bipolar disorder, including genome-wide association studies. Both the positive and negative findings have been incorporated so that the statistical and contextual significance of each finding may be compared semi-quantitatively and qualitatively across studies of mixed technologies. The database is appropriate for searching a literature populated by mainly underpowered studies, and if 'hits' are viewed as tentative knowledge for future hypothesis generation. It can serve as the basis for a mega-analysis of candidate genes. Herein, we discuss the most robust and best replicated gene findings to date in a contextual manner.

Heritability of cognitive functions in families with bipolar disorder

Bipolar disorder is highly heritable. Cognitive dysfunctions often observed in bipolar patients and their unaffected relatives implicate that these impairments may be associated with genetic predisposition to bipolar disorder and thus fulfill the criteria of a valid endophenotype for the disorder. However, the most fundamental criterion, their heritability, has not been directly studied in any bipolar population. This population-based study estimated the heritability of cognitive functions in bipolar disorder. A comprehensive neuropsychological test battery and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV were administered to a population-based sample of 110 individuals from 52 families with bipolar disorder. Heritability of cognitive functions as assessed with neuropsychological test scores were estimated using the Solar package. Significant additive heritabilities were found in verbal ability, executive functioning, and psychomotor processing speed. Genetic contribution was low to verbal learning functions. High heritability, in executive functioning and psychomotor processing speed suggest that these may be valid endophenotypic traits for genetic studies of bipolar disorder.

A Success at the End of an Era, and a Glimpse of Things to Come

A Success at the End of an Era, and a Glimpse of Things to Come

A Success at the End of an Era, and a Glimpse of Things to Come

A Success at the End of an Era, and a Glimpse of Things to Come

Genetics of bipolar disorder: a review

The present review provides a brief overview of both genetic epidemiological and molecular genetic studies of bipolar disorder. Twin studies have consistently shown an increased risk of bipolar disorder in monozygotic (identical) co-twins as compared to dizygotic (fraternal) co-twins of a proband with bipolar-I disorder, which indicates that a substantial proportion of the variance in the aetiology of bipolar disorder is likely to be attributable to genetic factors. The involvement of genetic factors in the development of bipolar disorder is also supported by the results of two adoption studies. According to family studies that included direct interviews of relatives as well as of a control group the risk ratio for bipolar disorder among relatives of bipolar patients has been estimated at around ten. However, family studies have revealed that the relatives of bipolar probands are not only at an increased risk for bipolar disorder, but also for unipolar depression. Regarding the morbidity risk for offspring of parents suffering from bipolar disorder, a meta-analysis revealed a 2.5-fold increased risk of developing any psychiatric disorder in children of bipolars as compared to those of non-psychiatric controls. Given the well-established familial aggregation of bipolar-I disorder as well as evidence that a substantial proportion of the variance in the aetiology of bipolar disorder is likely to be attributable to genetic factors, a series of linkage and association studies have attempted to identify the genes involved in the susceptibility to bipolar disorder. The findings of linkage studies are not consistent with the existence of a gene of major effect for the vulnerability for bipolar disorder, but several chromosomal regions have repeatedly been shown to be implicated. Two meta-analyses found evidence for susceptibility genes on chromosomes 8p22,9p22-21,10q21-22,13q32-34,14q24-32 and 22q11-22, as well as on regions on chromosome 18. Other regions of interest, identified by recent linkage studies are 6q16-22 and 12q23-24. Regarding candidate genes, for each of them there were usually some positive studies and generally an even greater number of negative replications. Meta-analyses of studies on these polymorphisms have provided some support for the implication of MAOA, COMT and 5HTT metabolism, all with modest effect sizes though. However, the strongest evidence currently supports the DAOA/G30 and the BDNF genes. The conflicting results obtained in psychiatry genetic research in the last decades are likely to be at least in part attributable to the heterogeneity of bipolar disorder. Therefore, the need to look for specific clinical indicators of bipolar disorder that could be used to identify more homogeneous subtypes of the disorder has frequently been highlighted. Recent studies that focused on early onset bipolar disorder or stratified the sample according to the age of onset have provided some interesting results. It is of interest that some of the regions identified in linkage studies of bipolar disorder overlap with regions implicated in schizophrenia and variations at the DAOA/G30 and the BDNF genes could predispose to both schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. The overlap in the biological basis between the two disorders could have implications for the classification of these major psychiatric disorders, which have been classified as distinct entities over the last 100 years.

A strategy for identifying phenotypic subtypes: Concordance of symptom dimensions between sibling pairs who met screening criteria for a genetic linkage study of childhood-onset bipolar disorder using the Child Bipolar Questionnaire

Background Specific symptom dimensions have been used to establish phenotypic subgroups in recent genetic studies of bipolar disorder. In preparation for a genetic linkage study of childhood-onset bipolar disorder (COBPD), we conducted an exploratory analysis of the concordance of prominent symptom dimensions between sibling pairs ( N = 260) who screened positive for COBPD. This report presents data on the potential usefulness of these dimensions in genotyping. Method A principal components factor analysis was conducted on the symptoms of 2795 children who screened positive for COBPD on the Child Bipolar Questionnaire (CBQ). The resulting factors were used in a concordance analysis between 260 proband/sibling pairs and 260 proband/matched comparison pairs. Results Ten factors were extracted. The strongest concordance coefficients (rho) between probands and siblings, and the widest contrasts between proband/sibling vs. proband/comparison pairs, were for Factor 9 (Fear of harm), Factor 5 (Aggression), Factor 10 (Anxiety), Factor 4 (Sensory sensitivity), Factor 6 (Sleep–wake cycle disturbances), and Factor 2 (Attention/Executive function deficits). Based on factor loadings and multivariate analyses, CBQ items were selected for a “Core Index” subscale that had a robust concordance estimate in the sibpair group (rho = 0.514, 95% CI 0.450–0.577) as compared to the proband-matched comparison group (rho = 0.093, 95% CI 0.008 to 0.178). Limitations Research diagnostic interviews (K-SADS P/L) were conducted to confirm bipolar diagnosis in only a subsample ( N = 100) of the children whose data were used for the concordance analysis. Conclusions Our data suggest a profile of heritable clinical dimensions in addition to classic mood symptomatology in COBPD. These features may represent a more homogeneous phenotypic subtype of COBPD that may prove more useful for delineating the neurobiology and genetics of the disorder than standard diagnostic models.

Neurocognitive Function as an Endophenotype for Genetic Studies of Bipolar Affective Disorder

The genetic basis of bipolar affective disorder remains opaque despite years of intensive investigation. One of the most serious difficulties for genetic research is the enormous phenotypic heterogeneity of psychiatric illnesses. As a response to this problem, geneticists have searched for alternative strategies to identify those individuals at genetic risk for developing the disorder. One approach is to use endophenotypes or intermediate traits. Gottesman and Gould (2003), in their discussion of endophenotypes, suggest five criteria that should be characteristic of a trait in order for it to qualify as an endophenotype. These five criteria are used in order to assess the viability of using measures of neuropsychological dysfunction as endophenotypes for genetic studies of bipolar disorder. A review of the literature suggests that executive dysfunction is characteristic of people with bipolar disorder in both the acute and chronic stages of the illness, that neurocognitive function is influenced by genetic factors and that neuropsychological deficits have been reported in the nonaffected relatives of bipolar probands. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether neuropsychological dysfunction co-segregates with affectively ill individuals. We conclude that the use of neurocognitive markers of bipolar illness suffers from a number of serious drawbacks but given the absence of more appropriate endophenotypes, the neuropsychological profiling of probands and their relatives may nevertheless prove to be a worthwhile exercise.

Genetics of bipolar disorder

Many linkage loci and candidate genes have been reported in molecular genetic studies of bipolar disorder. However, none of these findings have been consistently replicated. Meta-analyses of linkage studies have also reported conflicting results. Among recently reported candidate genes, BDNF, G72, AKT1, GRIN2A, XBP1, GRK3, HTR4, IMPA2 and GABRA1 may have some importance. Study of the possible roles of epigenetics or analysis of genetic diseases, in which bipolar disorder is one of phenotypes, may also be promising. In addition to monoaminergic and intracellular signaling pathways, recent studies have revealed possible roles for mitochondrial dysfunction, for glutamatergic dysfunction and for the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway.

The feasibility of neuropsychological endophenotypes in the search for genes associated with bipolar affective disorder

Efforts to identify genetic loci for bipolar disorder (BPD) have thus far proved elusive. The identification of processes mediating between genotype and phenotype (endophenotypes) may help resolve the carrier status of family members in genetic studies of polygenetic disorders with imperfect penetrance, such as BPD. We reviewed the literature to determine if neuropsychological measures could be used as effective endophenotypes to aid molecular genetic studies searching for genes predisposing to BPD. Four prerequisites for endophenotypic markers are described, and a critical review of relevant literature was undertaken to determine if neurocognitive measures satisfy these four requirements in BPD. We found evidence that executive functions and declarative memory may be candidate neurocognitive endophenotypes for BPD. However, we cannot exclude other areas of cognition as being affected by BPD susceptibility genes, given the limits of the current knowledge of the neuropsychology of BPD. In particular, the paucity of studies measuring cognition in healthy relatives of BPD patient limits conclusion regarding familial aggregation of particular neurocognitive deficits (i.e. attention). Furthermore, the effects of clinical state and/or medication usage on cognitive functioning in BPD probands should be further explored. Molecular genetic studies of BPD may benefit from the application of select neuropsychological measures as endophenotypic markers. The use of these markers, once defined, may improve power for detecting genes predisposing to BPD and may help to better define diagnostic criteria.

Genome scan of a second wave of NIMH genetics initiative bipolar pedigrees: chromosomes 2, 11, 13, 14, and X.

As part of the on-going NIMH Genetics Initiative on Bipolar Disorder, we have ascertained 153 multiplex bipolar pedigrees and genotyped them in two waves. We report here the genome scan results for chromosomes 2, 11, 13, 14, and X in the second wave of 56 families. A total of 354 individuals were genotyped and included in the current analyses, including 5 with schizoaffective/bipolar (SA/BP), 139 with bipolar I disorder (BPI), 41 with bipolar II disorder (BPII), and 43 with recurrent unipolar depression (RUP). Linkage analyses were carried out with multi-point parametric and non-parametric affected relative pair methods using three different definitions of the affected phenotype: (model 1) SA/BP and BPI; (model 2) SA/BP, BPI, and BPII; and (model 3) SA/BP, BPI, BPII, and RUP. The best findings were on 11p15.5 (NPL = 2.96, P = 0.002) and Xp11.3 (NPL = 2.19, P = 0.01). These findings did not reach conventional criteria for significance, but they were located near regions that have been identified in previous genetic studies of bipolar disorder. The relatively modest but consistent findings across studies may suggest that these loci harbor susceptibility genes of modest effect in a subset of families. Large samples such as that being collected by the NIMH Initiative will be necessary to examine the heterogeneity and identify these susceptibility genes.

Psychiatric diagnoses in the context of genetic studies of bipolar disorder.

Precise definition of the phenotype is an issue of critical importance for the future success of genetic studies of bipolar disorders. So far, an uncertain phenotypic spectrum and genetic heterogeneity are realities that have hampered progress in genetic studies. While recognition of a broader spectrum of related illnesses is important for some applications, for genetic studies a narrow spectrum of illness closely tied to the genotype is paramount. This paper highlights current dilemmas and trends associated with phenotype specification and traces historical approaches. Finally, we explore a number of strategic directions in the diagnostic approach to bipolar disorders that may better serve genetic studies.

The familial aggregation of psychotic symptoms in bipolar disorder pedigrees.

Symptomatic overlap between affective disorders and schizophrenia has long been noted. More recently, family and linkage studies have provided some evidence for overlapping genetic susceptibility between bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. If shared genes are responsible for the psychotic manifestations of both disorders, these genes may result in clustering of psychotic symptoms in some bipolar disorder pedigrees. The authors tested this hypothesis in families ascertained for a genetic study of bipolar disorder. Rates of psychotic symptoms-defined as hallucinations or delusions-during affective episodes were compared in families of 47 psychotic and 18 nonpsychotic probands with bipolar I disorder. The analysis included 202 first-degree relatives with major affective disorder. Significantly more families of psychotic probands than families of nonpsychotic probands (64% versus 28%) contained at least one relative who had affective disorder with psychotic symptoms. Significantly more affectively ill relatives of psychotic probands than of nonpsychotic probands (34% versus 11%) had psychotic symptoms. An analysis of clustering of psychotic subjects across all families revealed significant familial aggregation. Clustering of psychosis was also apparent when only bipolar I disorder was considered the affected phenotype. Psychotic bipolar disorder may delineate a subtype of value for genetic and biological investigations. Families with this subtype should be used to search for linkage in chromosomal regions 10p12-13, 13q32, 18p11.2, and 22q11-13, where susceptibility genes common to bipolar disorder and schizophrenia may reside. Putative schizophrenia-associated biological markers, such as abnormal evoked response, oculomotor, and neuroimaging measures, could similarly be explored in such families.